
|
|
|

|

|

| |  | |


|
FEATURES: US Election Irregularities
|
|


US tells Ukraine to recount votes on fradulent election!

By Dr. J. Alva Scruggs, November 27, 2004


Colin Powell (November 24, 2004), US Secretary of State tells the Ukraine to recount their resent election!! (Associated Press Published November 24, 2004) This is no joke. It seems that Powell was sent the Ukrane by our Commender and Thief to insist that the Nation recount the votes in their election because of suspected FRAUD.
It is a tragedy that Kerry has stood the role of a great leader, who would save our Democratic Republic from the grips of a corrupt and criminal machine, only to run away when things get really tuff. Kerry could have been a Gandhi, or Dr. King, or FDR, but he seem to have been playing an "ego game"? to get the glow of greatness without the substance to do the bidding of that position.
But now the Ukraine has given Americans a real example of a would-be-leader in Yanukovych, who is claimed to be the real winner of this election in the Ukraine. Yanukovych with the support of the US Administration, Bush, of all people, has chosen continue to stand with his supporters and fight for an honest look at the Fraud which is alleged to have been a part of this Ukraine election. Yanukovych has not left his millions of supporters strained, as has Kerry.
Kerry talked a good game but when the real step to power came under criminal attack he slid into some retreat where he sends his weak messages of surrender. But maybe he is doing a regrouping and the fifty million supporters will get his true leadership personality back in the position of activism.
Is this familiar? Here in the US we have just seen a flagrant committing of FRAUD in our Presidential Election 2004 and our unselected officials, Bush and company, are doing everything they can to stop any recounting of votes. The only thing really different between US and the Ukraine is that they are taking a more violent action by not allowing the criminal winners to peacefully sit down and start mis-running the peoples government.
The American public better grab this before the media and Rove cut off the coverage of this in real time! --
Dr. Scruggs writes in The Free Press. Courtesy of The Free Press

|


|


How a Republican election supervisor manipulated the 2004 central Ohio vote, in black and white

By Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman November 23, 2004

The Republican head of the Board of Elections in Franklin County, Ohio, manipulated the supply of voting machines on November 2, denying thousands of likely Democrats the right to cast their votes in a fair and timely manner. As indicated in the sworn testimony below, offered here for the first time, the election was engineered to make voting as difficult as possible for inner city residents, and to drive away those who could not afford to stay away from work or families, or whose health made it imprudent or impossible to endure the long, cold, wet lines.

|
Link to full text

|


|


Various editors

US election irregularities articles and commentary

How the Ohio election was rigged for Bush
Document reveals Columbus, Ohio voters waited hours as election officials held back machines
Amid Charges of Vote Suppression, Activists Look for Larger Fraud 
After the US elections, the Democratic leadership bows to the far right
Blame Kerry's DLC straight jacket 
And so the sorting and discarding of Kerry votes begins 
None dare call it voter suppression and fraud 
Web Media Links
Media Accused of Ignoring Election Irregularities
American Coup II
Evidence Mounts That The Vote May Have Been Hacked
The stolen election of 2004: welcome back to hell
An Examination of the Florida Elections
Kerry Won

|


|


|


OBL and twenty-year time bombs

By Ahmed Amr editor NileMedia.com November 1-7, 2004
Osama Bin Laden was destined to be a major factor in this election from the moment the first plane struck the World Trade Center. The memories of that assault are deeply etched in the collective American psyche.
Two days after the attack, George Bush assured a shaken nation that "The most important thing is for us to find Osama bin Laden. It is our number one priority and we will not rest until we find him."

|
Link to full text

|


|


Presidential Election Offers Little Choice for Israeli-Arab Peace

By Stephen Zunes, Foreign Policy In Focus November 1-7, 2004
 
Earlier last month, in a widely quoted interview in the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, Dov Weisglass--Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's senior adviser--acknowledged what most independent observers have known all along: that the Israeli government is not actually interested in a peace agreement with the Syrian government or the Palestinian Authority. Israel has occupied the Palestinian West Bank and Gaza Strip and the Syrian Golan Heights since these territories were seized by the Israeli armed forces in 1967, expelling thousands of Arabs and then colonizing these territories with Jewish settlers in contravention of international law.

|
Link to full text

|


|


Osama's surprise: Osama bin Laden as Global Shock Jock

By Tom Engelhardt November 1-7, 2004
Looked at realistically Osama bin Laden's intervention in our presidential election was undoubtedly an act of immediate organizational weakness, not strength. Had he had been capable of orchestrating the bringing down of another American tower or its equivalent, he certainly would have done so, but it was no less ingenious for that.
His last major intervention, his self-scripted action-adventure film in real time, The Humiliation of America, cost his organization hundreds of thousands of planning dollars and 19 suicidal believers (plus the price of airplane tickets, box-cutters, and mace).

|
Link to full text

|


|


Choose your Neo-Con Poison

By Ahmed Amr editor NileMedia.com November 1-7, 2004
 
"We're not going to beat George Bush by being Bush Lite. The way to beat George Bush is to give the 50% of Americans who quit voting because they can't tell the difference between the Democratic Party and the Republican Party - give them a reason to vote again." Howard Dean
If the polls are anywhere near the mark, George Bush has an even chance of polluting the White House for four more years. Given his record, the only reason Dubya remains a viable candidate is John Kerry.

|
Link to full text

|


|


Let Rupert Murdoch Appoint the President

By Ahmed Amr, Editor NileMedia.com October 25-31, 2004 What can one buy with 1.2 billion dollars? For starters, you might be able to afford a four-year lease on the White House. If you can spare a few extra billion, you have the luxury of running a slate of candidates for the available slots in Congress.
America is a free country with very expensive elections. Constructing a political machine for a single presidential race requires the investment of substantial resources by certain interested parties. The Financial Times just reported that "the presidential and congressional elections will cost $3.9bn, up 30 per cent from the $3bn spent on elections four years ago."

|
Link to full text

|


|


Both sides in debate about Kerry's Vietnam service ignore the truth of the war

By Robert Jensen October 25-31, 2004

It's ironic that John Kerry's character is under assault for the most courageous political act of his life -- his opposition to the Vietnam War. It's pathetic that instead of highlighting that part of his political history, Kerry is downplaying it. But the saddest aspect of the whole affair is that a campaign controversy that could help the United States come to terms with bigger truths about its brutal history of empire building is being used by both parties in ways that obscure the truth.

|
Link to full text

|


|


Polls, Damn Polls and Statistics

By Ahmed Amr, editor NileMedia.com October 25-31, 2004 One of the curious things about this election is that both candidates refuse to talk to the press. You would think both would be anxiously mugging for the cameras to land some free advertising. Yet, George Bush has spent his whole term dodging reporters. And John Kerry last held a press conference in August.

|
Link to full text

|


|


Election Day Fears

By Robert Jensen and Pat Youngblood October 18-24, 2004
We have two great fears about Election Day 2004: The first is that George W. Bush will be elected. The second is that John Kerry will be elected.
Those fears are rooted in an understanding that the threats to global justice and world peace come not from a single person or party but from systems, and that no matter who is elected, those systems -- empire and capitalism -- remain in place.

|
Link to full text

|


|


Bush debates Robin Cook in St. Louis

By Ahmed Amr
editor, NileMedia.com
October 11-17, 2004

The following is a partial transcript of the second presidential debate between President Bush (R) and Sen. John F. Kerry (D). The debate was held in Washington University in St. Louis and was moderated by Charles Gibson of ABC News. Because Kerry did such a miserable job of holding George accountable for the debacle in Iraq, we threw him out of the debating hall. In his place, we invited a worthier opponent to challenge the incumbent candidate, the honorable Robin Cook, the former foreign secretary of Great Britain.

|
Link to full text

|


|


Analysis : Most misleading foreign policy statements by candidates in VP debate

By Stephen Zunes,
Middle East editor, Foreign Policy In Focus
October 11-17, 2004
Listed here is what I consider to be the sixteen most misleading statements made by Vice-President Dick Cheney and Senator John Edwards during the foreign policy segment of their debate of October 5, followed by my critiques. This is a non-partisan analysis: eleven of the misleading statements cited are from Cheney and five are from Edwards. The quotes are listed in the order in which they appear in the transcript.

|
Link to full text

|


|
|

|
|


|