Shildt Financial Services
210 W. Hamilton Avenue
State College, PA 16801
800-211-7819 (Toll-Free)
234-1419 (Local Area)

shildtfs@aol.com



 



Home


Contact Info


Safety Alerts
and Save America News


Links


Files


Conference


 More Information



About Shildt Financial Services


Products & Services


"10 Reasons"
To Use Us


Proposal Requests







..

Safety Alerts And Save America News


SAFETY ALERTS: go to CPSC, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, to help keep your family and yourself safe by checking product recalls and safety news.

Or go to FDA, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, for recalls, market withdrawals and safety alerts.

 

wavingeagleV1X.gif 

SAVE  AMERICA  NEWS: 



View the index page


Which Brutal Disease Is More Toxic To America: Ebola Or Obama?
Ebola is a terrible threat. Obama is already terribly toxic. Obama has destroyed Americaís economy, healthcare system, national interests and reputation. Examples: Ebola: Threatens to damage the economy. Obama: already has destroyed the economy. More than 92 million working-age Americans are not working with 10 million fewer Americans working than on the day Obama took office. Ebola: The costs for Ebola are frightening but Ebola is with us for weeks or months. Then itís gone. Obama: The $7 trillion in debt added by Obama will cause decades of pain for Americans. Ebola: Might overwhelm the U.S. healthcare system and result in higher health insurance premiums. Obama: Obamacare has already wrecked the U.S. healthcare system with premiums up more in the past year than in the prior 8 years combined; even shockingly higher premiums are being intentionally delayed by Obama until after the November 2014 election.


Which Brutal Disease Is More Toxic To America: Ebola Or Obama?

Is Ebola Or Obama More Toxic To America?

October 23, 2014 By Wayne Allyn Root ó Personal Liberty Digest

Watch the video here ó http://personalliberty.com/ebola-obama-toxic-america/ ó or read the text of it below:

Hi. Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. From my commentaries the past few weeks, you know Iím concerned about a potential Ebola pandemic inside America. Nonetheless, Ebola is a worry about a potential problem, a theoretical problem. No one knows yet how much damage Ebola can do to America.

On the other hand, we have already experienced the damage, destruction and pain of Obama. Letís compare Ebola to Obama.

Ebola: So far, one dead and two nurses infected.

Obama: Almost 50 million Americans on food stamps, 108 million on welfare or other entitlement programs and an all-time record number on disability. More than $3.7 trillion has been spent on welfare over the past five years under Obama.

Ebola: The healthcare, decontamination and security costs for Ebola are frightening. Each patient could cost in excess of $1 million to treat. But so far, there are only a handful of patients. Ebola is with us for weeks or months. Then itís gone.

Obama: The $7 trillion in debt added by Obama (so far) will cause decades of pain for American consumers and taxpayers, damage middle-class quality of life and reduce U.S. economic growth for many generations to come.

Ebola: Threatens to damage various sectors of the economy, but no one knows how bad it might be.

Obama: already destroyed the economy. More than 92 million working-age Americans are not working. There are 10 million fewer Americans working than on the day Obama took office (even though the population is dramatically higher). We now have the lowest workforce participation rate in recorded history.

Ebola: This dreadful virus might overwhelm the U.S. healthcare system and result in higher health insurance premiums to pay for the massive cost.

Obama: No guesswork is needed. The facts are in. Obamacare has already wrecked the U.S. healthcare system and dramatically increased our premium costs. Premiums were up more in the past year than in the prior eight years combined. But the worst is yet to come. Rates are going even higher (more than 60 percent in Seattle, for example). And millions of cancellation notices are going out in the next few weeks.

Ebola: This virus has no known interaction with the Internal Revenue Service. It never came after me personally.

Obama: used the IRS to try to destroy conservative donors and critics. Iím a witness. The White House clearly ordered the IRS to try to destroy me not once, but twice. Judicial Watch demanded the IRS hand over all documents related to my case. The IRS had 30 days ó by law Ė to comply. That was 15 months ago. The IRS has broken the law of the United States for well over a year to cover up for the crimes of Obama.

Ebola: doesnít sell guns to anyone.

Obama: In the Fast and Furious scandal, the Obama administration sold guns to Mexican drug lords that killed more than 200 Mexican citizens, plus a U.S.

border agent. So far, thatís 200 more deaths than Ebola has caused in North America.

Ebola: doesnít trade deserters for five jihadi terrorist murderers.

Obama: demoralizes U.S. military by making that unimaginable trade, cuts the size of the military dramatically, sends 4,000 troops into the Ebola zone (with only four hours of Ebola training), and purges more generals than any president in history.

Ebola: never infected a single person at the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya.

Obama: allegedly traded arms to Muslim rebels that led to the deaths of four American heroes at Benghazi, ignored pleas from our ambassador for more security, denied a rescue mission while our heroes were under vicious attack and then covered up the tragedy by blaming it on obscure movie no one in Middle

Ebola: doesnít steal my money or regulate me out of business.

Obama: put in place the single biggest tax increase (Obamacare) in history. Worse, he has proposed the most tax increases in history that never passed: 442. Worst of all, Obama is the No. 1 regulator in U.S. history.

Ebola: so far has not affected the border.


Obama: has crippled border security. He has left our Southern border completely unsecured from:

Massive waves of illegal immigrants desperate for cradle-to-grave entitlements.
Diseases like TB, enteroviruses and, of course, Ebola.
And terrorist cells that could cross our wide-open border and unleash a devastating 9/11-style attack on U.S. soil.

Ebola: so far poses no threat to Israel and has left the Middle East untouched.


Obama: His policies have endangered the security of Israel and led to the "Arab Spring" that toppled dictators friendly to America, leaving the Middle East under attack from radical groups like ISIS.

Add it up.

Ebola is a terrible threat. But so far, it is only a threat.

Obama is toxic. Obama has had a devastating effect upon Americaís economy, healthcare system, national interests and reputation across the globe.

Ebola might give us a punch in gut.

Obama could be fatal.

Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. God bless America.





The Obamacare News Just Keeps Getting Worse: But donít expect the mainstream media to make much of a fuss over the latest bad news about Obamacare ó especially not in the days leading up to the midterm elections
Obamacare is turning out to be a costly disaster. And itís only going to get worse. Those 30,000 Wal-Mart employees who are losing their health insurance arenít alone. 13 states and the District of Columbia are canceling plans that are not in compliance with Obamacare. Virginia will be the hardest hit, with some 250,000 families losing their health insurance. More than 4 million people received notices last year that their healthcare plan was being canceled. Now, more cancellations are inevitable. Plus, a ton of people who will retain their health insurance are seeing staggering increases in what they have to pay. Beginning in January 2015, anyone who does not have health insurance that meets the Obamacare requirements will be subject to penalties.


The Obamacare News Just Keeps Getting Worse: But donít expect the mainstream media to make much of a fuss over the latest bad news about Obamacare ó especially not in the days leading up to the midterm elections.

The Obamacare News Just Keeps Getting Worse

October 23, 2014 By Chip Wood ó Personal Liberty Digest

Those 30,000 Wal-Mart employees who are losing their health insurance arenít alone. Thereís another huge wave of cancellations of health plans coming.

Fox News reported that 13 states and the District of Columbia are canceling plans that are not in compliance with the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, otherwise known as Obamacare. Virginia will be the hardest hit, with some 250,000 families losing their health insurance.

Of course, all of the plans being canceled now werenít in compliance a year ago. But back then, President Obama asked that they be granted a reprieve from enforcement. That is now coming to an end. As a result, hundreds of thousands more people will lose their health insurance.

Remember President Obamaís often-repeated promise, "If you like your health care plan, you can keep it?" PolitiFact labeled that one its "Lie of the Year" in 2013. More than 4 million people received notices last year that their healthcare plan was being canceled.

Now, more cancellations are inevitable. Plus, a ton of people who will retain their health insurance are seeing staggering increases in what they have to pay. The average increase is reported to be 8 percent, but some unlucky folks are getting hit with premium increases of 30 percent or more. Ouch!

No doubt, having your insurance canceled is worse than being hit with an increased premium. Earlier this month, Wal-Mart announced that it was dropping health insurance for some 30,000 part-time workers. But employees who get to keep their health coverage from the company will see increases in the premiums they pay.

Sally Welborn, a Wal-Mart vice president, said: "We canít take our eyes off costs." She said the company, the largest private employer in the country, has seen its healthcare costs rise by $500 million more than the company expected in its current fiscal year, which ends Jan. 31.

But the bad news about Obamacare doesnít end here. The fallout is being felt all over the place. For example, two dozen rural hospitals were forced to close their doors in 2013. Thatís double the normal rate. And you can expect the closures to increase, as rural communities shrink in population, while healthcare costs continue to climb.

And according to the top executive of H&R Block, the nationís largest tax preparer, Obamacare will add "significant complexity" to next yearís tax season. CEO William Cobb warned, "Depending on their situation, there are instances where filers may need to file multiple new tax forms and complete additional worksheets."

Beginning in January, anyone who does not have health insurance that meets the Obamacare requirements will be subject to penalties. While the law does provide for exemptions, Cobb said, "Depending on the type of exemption, the process to claim it could be quite cumbersome and time consuming."

Oh, and Cobb said people who received a subsidy for health insurance could be in for a shock, if calculations show they received a larger subsidy than they were entitled to. In theory, theyíll have to repay the federal government for any overage they got.

So, yes, Obamacare is turning out to be the costly disaster that many of us predicted it would be. And itís only going to get worse.

But donít expect the mainstream media to make much of a fuss over the latest bad news about Obamacare ó especially not in the days leading up to the midterm elections.

If Republicans win a majority in the Senate, theyíll finally be able to break the logjam on legislation that Harry Reid imposed while he was majority leader. And while Obama would be certain to veto any bill to repeal Obamacare that finally made it to his desk, at least the country would have taken a healthy first step toward getting this bureaucratic monstrosity off our backs.

As more and more Americans are learning, it canít happen soon enough.


Until next time, keep some powder dry.

ĖChip Wood





Obamaís Gutter Politics & Hate Campaign Deliver The Sleaziest November Election Ad Yet Against Republicans: ďDemocrats' Dirty Deceptive LieĒ Blames Republican Budget Cuts For Ebola Deaths
The truth, of course, is that the CDC doesnít suffer from a lack of funding. Its current budget comes to a staggering $6.9 billion, which is $300 million more than Obama requested in his budget proposal for fiscal year 2014. And even the rather minor cuts to its budget in the past canít be blamed on Republicans. The biggest reductions came about because of sequestration, a measure originally proposed by Obama. But sadly, there will be a whole lot of what are charitably called ďlow-information votersĒ who buy into this hate campaign. (ďLow-informationĒ means those dummies who canít name their senators or congressman or even the three branches of government, but can always be counted on to check the ďDĒ boxes when they mark their ballots.


Obamaís Gutter Politics & Hate Campaign Deliver The Sleaziest November Election Ad Yet Against Republicans: ďDemocrats' Dirty Deceptive LieĒ Blames Republican Budget Cuts For Ebola Deaths

The Democratsí Sleaziest Ad Yet

October 16, 2014 ó By Chip Wood ó Personal Liberty Digest

In a political season marked by some pretty vicious attack ads, the Democrats have just sunk to a new low. A left-wing group called the Agenda Project Action Fund boasted that it is launching "a multi-pronged blitzkrieg attack that lays blame for the Ebola crisis exactly where it belongs ó at the feet of the Republican lawmakers."

Erica Payne, the groupís founder and president, said in a statement: "In launching this effort, we will be the first major progressive group to directly blame GOP budget cuts for the nearly 4,000 deaths caused by the Ebola crisis."

Sounds absolutely absurd, doesnít it? But sadly, there will be a whole lot of what are charitably called "low-information voters" who buy into this hate campaign. ("Low-information" means those dummies who canít name their senators or congressman or even the three branches of government, but can always be counted on to check the "D" boxes when they mark their ballots.)

The group said its new ad, which is called "Republican Cuts Kill," will target Mitch McConnell in Kentucky, Pat Roberts in Kansas and more than a dozen other Republican politicians as well as their votes that cut the budgets of the National Institute of Health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and gutted foreign aid ó all programs that could have dealt with the epidemic.

By the way, this is the same sleazy organization that created the infamous TV ad where a Paul Ryan-look alike pushed an elderly woman in a wheelchair over a cliff. So you can bet they wonít let the truth get in the way of a headline-grabbing publicity campaign.

The truth, of course, is that the CDC doesnít suffer from a lack of funding. Its current budget comes to a staggering $6.9 billion, which is $300 million more than President Obama requested in his budget proposal for fiscal year 2014.

And even the rather minor cuts to its budget in the past canít be blamed on Republicans. The biggest reductions came about because of sequestration, a measure originally proposed by Obama.

No, the problem isnít how much money the CDC or the NIH receives from us beleaguered taxpayers, but how they decide to spend it. In the past, they have financed studying why lesbians are more obese than straight women, the dangers of having sex with Mexican prostitutes and even a cost/benefit analysis of the sex habits of snails.

By the way, donít hold your breath waiting for Allison Lundergan Grimes, the Democratic candidate running against McConnell in Kentucky, to denounce this example of gutter politics. Heck, sheís the same person who has refused to admit that she voted for Obama in 2008 and 2012. Not exactly a profile in courage.

The Senate race in Kentucky is so close that even a sleazy attack ad like this one could make a difference. Even before it appeared, Republican strategist Karl Rove put the election there in the toss-up category. While Iíve never been a big fan of McConnellís less-than-inspired leadership as Senate minority leader, his defeat this November would be a severe blow to Republican morale.

Will such despicable fear mongering work? Or will it actually backfire by energizing the Republican base? Weíll find out in three more weeks.

Until next time, keep some powder dry.

ĖChip Wood





Democrats Using ďPhony IndependentsĒ In November Election In Attempt To Steal Senate Majority: Democratic candidates are trying to fool voters into believing that they are independents and not the party hack/Obama rubber stamps they truly are
Failing to persuade voters to support their discredited agenda, Democrats are now determined to use a false flag strategy to advance their plan to steal a Senate majority this November. By pretending that they are Independents, they can take power and help Obama implement his plan to create a single ruling party government in the U.S. Were these "independent" Democrats true Independents, their presence in our national politics would be welcome. But they are not. If elected, they would each meekly cast their ballots for Harry Reid to be Majority Leader and form a tame part of his bloc that controls the Senate. Once in the Senate, all traces of their independence will vanish and they will fall in line with the Democratic Caucus.


Democrats Using ďPhony IndependentsĒ In November Election In Attempt To Steal Senate Majority: Democratic candidates are trying to fool voters into believing that they are independents and not the party hack/Obama rubber stamps they truly are

Democrats Using 'False Flag' Plan to Steal Senate

Newsmax ó Monday, October 13, 2014

By: Dick Morris

Failing to persuade voters to support their discredited agenda, Democrats are now determined to use a false flag strategy to advance their plan to steal a Senate majority this November.

Masquerading as independents in four key Senate races, Democratic candidates are embracing a wolf-in-sheep's-clothing tactic to fool voters into believing that they are not the party hack/Obama rubber stamps they truly are.

By pretending that they are Independents, they can take power and help Obama implement his plan to create a single ruling party government in the U.S.

I have been warning about Obama's plan in my new bestseller "Power Grab: Obama's Dangerous Plan for a One Party Nation."

As the Democratic campaigns unfold, my main thesis is backed up by the facts on the ground.

Were these "independent" Democrats true Independents, their presence in our national politics would be welcome. But they are not.

If elected, they would each meekly cast their ballots for Harry Reid to be Majority Leader and form a tame part of his bloc that controls the Senate.

In South Dakota, former Republican senator turned liberal Democrat Larry Pressler is running as an "independent" against former Governor Mike Rounds, the Republican candidate. The latest polling puts him only two points behind Rounds. Having served three terms as a GOP senator, Pressler backed Obama in 2008 and 2012 and supports Obamacare. His strategy is either to win or to take enough votes away from Rounds to elect Rick Weiland, the overt Democratic candidate. The South Dakota seat had been written off as a certain Republican pickup until Pressler implemented the false flag strategy.

In Kansas, Republican Pat Roberts was coasting to a fourth Senate term when Greg Orman jumped into the race as an independent. Orman, who voted for Obama in 2008 and 2012, backs Obamacare, embraces the Democratic platform in toto, and actually tried to run before as a Democrat. But now heís an "Independent." The fact that George Soros' son is reportedly hosting a fundraiser for Orman should make clear he's no independent.

In North Carolina, Republican Thom Tillis is locked in a close battle against Democratic Senator Kay Hagan. The only reason the race is close in this state Mitt Romney carried in 2012 is the presence of Sean Haugh, a pizza delivery man running as the Libertarian Party candidate. Haugh draws between 4 and 8 percent of the vote, in various polls, but all of it comes from Tillis, the Republican candidate. Where is Haugh getting his support? His money? Ask the Democrats.

In Kentucky, Alison Lundergan Grimes -- running against Republican Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell -- refuses to say if she voted for Obama in 2008 or 2012. Obviously, she did. And just as obviously, she is running away from it now. She says she will oppose Obamaís war on coal, but, if elected, it is clear she will toe the party line as Reid demands.

The Democrats first used false flag strategy in Maine in 2012 when Governor Angus King, running as an Independent, took the Republican seat formerly occupied by Olympia Snowe.

Once in the Senate, all traces of independence vanished and he fell in line with the Democratic Caucus.

Indeed, Independent Senator Bernie Sanders told his Vermont voters that he, too,  was not a Democrat.  But at least Bernie had the guts to call himself what he really is -- a Socialist.

The new Democrat "Independents" have no such courage.





A Majority Of Americans Now Believe That Obama Is A "Failed President"
The list of people who believe President Barack Obama is calling the right shots from the Oval Office appears to be shrinking daily. He's losing favor with American voters, former administration officials and even leftist pundits. A majority of Americans believe the president is a "failure". Only 43% say they would vote for Obama if the 2012 election were held today; 49% say they'd vote for Mitt Romney. Only 46% of those from states that Obama carried two years ago say they'd do so again, given another chance. Obama has spent 200 more hours whacking a golf ball than attending his daily intelligence briefings. He said he was really upset about ISIS's beheading of a journalist, and then seven minutes later he went to a golf course and was seen goofing around on the first tee. Maybe that's what Obama's true talent is: being a goofy out of whack ball whacker.


A Majority Of Americans Now Believe That Obama Is A "Failed President"

Obama Is A Failed President

October 7, 2014 By Sam Rolley -- Personal Liberty Digest

The list of people who believe President Barack Obama is calling the right shots from the Oval Office appears to be shrinking daily. He's losing favor with American voters, former administration officials and even leftist pundits.

A majority of Americans believe the president is a "failure."

An IBD/TIPP poll out this week finds that a 53 percent of Americans categorize Obama's tenure in the White House as a "failure," compared to 41 percent who rate the president a success. Six percent of those polled couldn't decide.

Among independents, Obama is viewed as a "failure" 58 percent of the time.

Young Americans 18 to 24 are the most likely to say Obama is a successful president at 77 percent. Obama does the poorest among the 25- to 44-year-olds currently battling economic troubles and a bad job situation; they call the president a failure 59 percent of the time.

The poll also finds that voter's remorse is on the rise.

IBD notes: "[O]nly 43% say they would vote for Obama if the 2012 election were held today; 49% say they'd vote for Mitt Romney. Only 46% of those from states that Obama carried two years ago say they'd do so again, given another chance."

Former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta thinks Obama has "given up."

Panetta, joining MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell Tuesday, said that Obama should be tackling the nation's problems head-on in the remaining years of his presidency. Instead, the former Defense and CIA official said, Obama has given up.

"He approaches things like a law professor in presenting a logic of his position. There is nothing wrong with that. We want to have a president who thinks through the issues. My experience in Washington is that logic alone doesn't work. Once you lay out a position, you are going to roll up your sleeves and you have to fight to get it done. That is key in Washington. In order for presidents to succeed, they cannot just -- when they run into problems, step back and give up."

"There is a feeling and I have a feeling that the leadership and the president have given up on the big issues facing this country whether it's immigration or a budget deal or infrastructure funding or trade or energy. there is a sense that you can't deal with that. This country needs that. They can't give up."

The Washington Posts' Dana Milbank, on Monday, noted that Panetta is one of many Obama "subordinates" currently lashing out at the president in a column titled, "Leon Panetta, other former Obama subordinates show stunning disloyalty."

"Whatever causes Obama's difficulty inspiring loyalty," Milbanks writes, "his failure is delighting conservatives and Republicans."

Indeed.

Even Piers Morgan wants to know: "What the hell is Obama Doing?­"

Morgan took Obama to task the "terrible imagery" provided to Americans due to the president's apparent aloofness in a recent exchange with Fox's Sean Hannity.

Morgan, like other administration critics, pointed to a lack of leadership in a discussion about ISIS.

Here's a partial transcript of the conversation:

MORGAN: And it's that lack of decision-making that I think leads to the issues we now face.

HANNITY: You know what frustrates me, Fort Hood is still officially in this country an example of workplace violence. What happened in Oklahoma, you've watched -- you've read this guy's Facebook page. It's all about jihad. They won't say it was an act of terrorism either. ISIS is not Islamic according to the president. And we're not at war with ISIS even though we're bombing them.

MORGAN: And this is all just nonsense rhetoric, because ISIS clearly is an Islamic fundamentalist organization. It's a terror group. And when they start beheading American and British citizens in these gruesome snuff movies that they're making and releasing them to the world taunting --

HANNITY: Horrible.

MORGAN: -- taunting these countries, it's not good enough to simply say, yes, I'm really upset about this beheading, and then seven minutes later, as Obama did, go to a golf course and be seen goofing around on the first tee. That really hit home to me. Someone did a survey this week. They counted up the number of hours that Obama has been playing golf since he was president. It was about 850 hours if you base it on a five-hour round.

HANNITY: More than the time he spent in his intelligence briefings.

MORGAN: He attended 42 percent of his daily briefings, total hours of that 650 or something. He spent 200 more hours whacking a golf ball than attending his daily briefings. Now, it's not as simplistic as that. Obviously he would get other briefings. But such terrible imagery to me, and I've basically been reasonably supportive of him. What the hell is he doing to groups like ISIS and others intent on causing America and Britain serious harm?

To answer Morgan's question, Obama spent Tuesday afternoon fundraising for Democrats.

Via USA Today:

After a morning of meetings at the White House, Obama will travel to Democratic Party fundraising events in New York and Connecticut.

Two afternoon events in New York City will benefit the Democratic National Committee.

After those, Obama heads to a private home in Greenwich, Conn., for a fundraiser on behalf of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee.

The president, it seems, is a better salesman than he is an executive.





The Obama Administration's Latest Jobs Report Is "Pure Fraud And Fantasy": Obama is creating a nation of desperate, government-dependent minimum wage workers who are more likely to vote Democrat
The reason unemployment dropped to the fantasy level of 5.9% is that 315,000 more Americans dropped out of the labor force last month. Most of them dropped off unemployment to get on welfare, food stamps or disability. The labor force participation rate just dropped to the lowest in 36 years; there are now 92.6 million working-age Americans not working. Monthly hiring plummeted 294,000 positions last month; the worst drop since 2010. What good are 248,000 new jobs, if they are all part-time or low-wage jobs in the lowest-quality categories. Only in the Obama economy is it good news that people stop working and join the welfare rolls because they are now more likely to vote Democrat. Obama is creating a nation of desperate, government-dependent minimum wage workers.


The Obama Administration's Latest Jobs Report Is "Pure Fraud And Fantasy": Obama is creating a nation of desperate, government-dependent minimum wage workers who are more likely to vote Democrat

Latest Jobs Report Is Pure Fraud And Fantasy

September 9, 2014 By Wayne Allyn Root -- Personal Liberty Digest

Watch the video here: http://personalliberty.com/latest-job-report-pure-fraud-fantasy/ or read the text of it below:

Hello. I'm Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. Here we go again. The latest jobs report came out last week, and it's pure fraud and fantasy -- lies and propaganda passed off as "good news." The reality is this new jobs report is a disaster for America and our middle class.

The "facts" released by our "honest and transparent government" report 248,000 new jobs created, beating expectations by a mile. The "facts" report unemployment dropping to 5.9 percent, the lowest rate since 2008.

It's as if President Obama is saying, "If you like your job, you can keep it."

But you can't. It's no more truthful or realistic than "If you like your insurance, you can keep it." Same fraud. Same lies. Same propaganda. Same banana republic mainstream media reporting lies, fantasy and propaganda as truth.

Here are the real facts about the latest jobs report.

First, the reason unemployment dropped to the fantasy level of 5.9 percent is that 315,000 more Americans dropped out of the labor force last month.

Where did they go? Most of them dropped off unemployment to get on welfare, food stamps or disability. Job categories used to be listed as policeman, fireman, scientist, butcher and baker. Now we should add "government dole." Millions of people get up late, watch Judge Judy and Dr. Phil and get off the couch for the first time all day to open the mail to find their government check. This is the Obama economy. Obama uses the fact that millions of Americans are not working as a reason to lower the unemployment rate.

Where will America get the money to pay for all these welfare, food stamp, disability and Social Security checks for citizens who will never work again? We're already broke. This just adds to the crushing unsustainable $18 trillion debt.

This isn't good news. It's a disaster.

Adding to the misery, the labor force participation rate just dropped to the lowest in 36 years. There are now 92.6 million working-age Americans not working.

This isn't good news. It's a disaster.

Like those late night infomercials say: "But wait. There's more!"

How can 248,000 new jobs be a good thing if average hourly wages are stagnant or dropping? Because they are. That fact was buried in the latest jobs report.

Even the Americans lucky enough to have a job are drowning in quicksand. As Democrat Bill Clinton just admitted, "The average family is making less, adjusted for inflation, than they were the day I left office."

The middle class isn't getting richer, it's getting poorer. Even Clinton understands that under Obama the middle class is struggling to survive and struggling to pay bills -- that's if they still have a job.

This isn't good news. It's a disaster.

The bad news is coming in waves. The media forgot to tell you that inside last week's jobs report was this nugget of reality: The only people being hired are your grandparents; 230,000 of the new jobs went to those in the 55- to 69-year-old age group. In the prime working-age group of 24 to 54 years old, 10,000 jobs were lost.

Holy freaking Batman! What is happening? It means grandma and grandpa are desperate and willing to take grandson's low-wage job to survive until Social Security kicks in. Or perhaps they need to work until the day they die to supplement Social Security. But that's very bad news. The U.S. workforce is now the oldest in history. If grandpa or grandma has to work (out of desperation) until the day he or she dies, there will never be any decent jobs for the grandkids.

This isn't good news. It's a disaster.

But I've saved the two worst bits of news for last. What good is the news of 248,000 new jobs, if they are all part-time or low-wage jobs? Four of the 5 new jobs were in the lowest-quality categories.

Obama is creating a nation of desperate, government-dependent minimum wage workers. If you lose your $100,000 job, get ready to clean toilets, flip burgers, mow lawns or work at The Gap -- because that's all that's available among the new jobs.

That's if there are any jobs at all. I believe the numbers of new jobs are pure fraud, made up out of thin air. Want proof? The government's own JOLT report came out on Tuesday. It says that monthly hiring has plummeted, dropped off a cliff.

It was down 294,000 positions last month. That's the worst drop since 2010 -- and the third worst number since the Lehman Brothers collapse in 2008.

So now I ask you: How could there be good news about jobs created at the same time the government's own report shows a severe halt to hiring? Somebody's cooking the books, folks.

And how come the mainstream media only reports on the fraudulent report showing jobs created but never mentions the other report showing plummeting hiring? Good question. The media is obviously in on the fix. The media has a conflict of interest. The media is big business. The media is owned by billion-dollar companies. Their advertisers are billion-dollar companies. Their own media companies are publicly traded on Wall Street. They are in on the fix. They desperately want you to believe all is well, so their advertisers keep spending and so their stock prices don't plummet. They need to keep the Ponzi scheme going. Can you spell "banana republic?

"Welcome to Obama's America: where up is down, where bad news is reported as good news, where old is the new young (because only old people work anymore), where minimum wage is this president's obsession because minimum wage jobs are the only jobs in the Obama economy, where it's good news that people stop working and join the welfare rolls because they are now more likely to vote Democrat and where, as Nancy Pelosi claims, "Food stamps, unemployment and welfare are the best ways to grow the economy."

Oh, my God! This, folks, is an unmitigated disaster. This, folks, is the murder of the middle class.

And this latest jobs report is pure fraud and fantasy.

I'm Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week for another dose of raw truth. God bless America.





Obamacare Taxes & Subsidies Dictate A "Massive & Disastrous Shift" To Part-Time, Low-Wage Workers By Penalizing Full-Time Workers
There will be 3 major employment disincentives resulting from the benefits Obamacare provides: (1) an explicit tax on full-time work, (2) an implicit tax on full-time work for those who are ineligible for the ACAís health insurance subsidies, and (3) an implicit tax that links the amount of available subsidies to workersí incomes. Nearly 1/2 of the U.S. labor force will experience ďsignificant changes,Ē under Obamacareís regressive incentives, to work less. ďObmacare may put millions of Americans in a position in which working part time yields more disposable income than working full time. This occurs when the generous assistance to part-time workers for health insurance premiums & out-of-pocket expenses offsets much of the income they forgo by working fewer hours. The lack of this insurance assistance for full-time workers amounts to a tax on full-time work.


Obamacare Taxes & Subsidies Dictate A "Massive & Disastrous Shift" To Part-Time, Low-Wage Workers By Penalizing Full-Time Workers

Study: Obamacare Incentivizes A Massive Shift To Part-Time Working Hours

October 8, 2014 By Ben Bullard ó Personal Liberty Digest

Obamacare will erode full-time employment and bolster the ranks of Americaís part-time employees, thanks to "implicit" and "explicit" taxes that entice both workers and their employers to follow or avoid the governmentís path of least resistance to qualifying for healthcare coverage.

Thatís the conclusion of a 47-page study released Tuesday by the Mercatus Center at George Mason University, a nonprofit that researches and advocates for free-market policy.

Titled "The Affordable Care Act and the New Economics of Part-Time Work," the study identifies several Obamacare features likely to drive a fundamental shift in labor demographics, as more people and businesses begin complying with the law:

"Starting this year, the United Statesí working population will face three major employment disincentives resulting from the very benefits the Affordable Care Act (ACA) provides: (1) an explicit tax on full-time work, (2) an implicit tax on full-time work for those who are ineligible for the ACAís health insurance subsidies, and (3) an implicit tax that links the amount of available subsidies to workersí incomes.

"The ACAís overall impact on employmentÖ will arguably be larger than that of any single piece of legislation since World War II," the authors assert. Mercatus expects nearly half of the U.S. labor force to experience "significant changes," under Obamacareís regressive incentives, to work less.

"The ACA may put millions of Americans in a position in which working part time yields more disposable income than working full time," the summary states. "This occurs when the ACAís generous assistance to part-time workers for health insurance premiums and out-of-pocket expenses offsets much of the income they forgo by working fewer hours. The lack of this insurance assistance for full-time workers amounts to a tax on full-time work."

In addition, the study forecasts a twofold increase over previously reported estimates of how dramatically Obamacare will affect U.S. productivity in terms of total hours worked.

"This analysis, combined with lessons from labor market history, leads to an estimate that the ACA will reduce employment and aggregate hours by slightly more than 3 percent, or about 4 million full-time-equivalent workers," the authors predict.

"This is nearly double the contraction indicated in prior studies, mainly because some previous work underestimated the size of the ACAís employer penalty and did not consider the full range of tax effects."

The full results of the Mercatus Center study can be viewed here. A synopsis of its findings is here.





Will Obama Use The Ebola Scare To Exercise The Governmentís Presumed Authority ďFor The Greater GoodĒ To Manipulate And Delay The November National Election?
Curious timing, this announcement that the U.S. now has Ebola patient No. 1. five weeks before a national election. And with perhaps thousands upon thousands being isolated; well, what about the Nov. 4 election? And is it not just a little curious that the government ordered 160,000 hazmat suits in response to a disease that is said not to be airborne? And is it not just a little curious that a large government supplier of emergency response products specializing in ďhigh risk eventsĒ said in a public tweet that Disaster Assistance Response Teams were told weeks or months ago to prepare to be activated in the month of October? The government has assumed the authority to lock down and/or quarantine areas at will. Donít think it wonít exercise that presumed authority ďfor the greater good.Ē


Will Obama Use The Ebola Scare To Exercise The Governmentís Presumed Authority ďFor The Greater GoodĒ To Manipulate And Delay The November National Election?

Is Ebola Obamaís October Surprise?

October 3, 2014 By Bob Livingston ó Personal Liberty Digest

Curious timing, this announcement that the U.S. now has Ebola patient No. 1.

Five weeks before a national election.

First case in Texas, where President Barack Obamaís de facto amnesty policy for illegals allowed for an influx of tens of thousands of immunity-compromised, disease-carrying, individuals from the Central American backwaters. People rife for "catching" the Ebola virus.

The first patient, Thomas E. Duncan, was allowed to travel freely into the U.S. from Liberia, despite, as we have learned, having hand-carried a convulsing 19-year-old woman to an Ebola clinic in Monrovia ó a woman who died from the disease the next day. And despite being told two times that Duncan had been to Liberia, hospital workers sent him home with antibiotics. Home to a residence with three children. Children who then went to school.

But itís worse. Much worse. Duncan traveled through Dulles International Airport, where he had a layover of nearly three hours, and then to Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport.

We were initially told that 12 to 18 people ó now including a total of five children who went to four different schools ó had come into contact with Duncan after he had become symptomatic. By the next day, that list had expanded to a total of 80 to 100. Those initial contacts are being isolated for 21 days.

"Itís a constant process of interviews and locating as many contacts as are out there," Dallas County health official Erikka Neroes said. "We expect daily that there could be more people added." Others could fall off the list as time passes and they show no symptoms. "Itís constantly evolving," she said.

Those initial contacts are being isolated for 21 days, the purported incubation period for the disease. Twenty-one days, and as another case pops up, those concentric circles grow until you have more being isolated for 21 days and more being isolated for 21 daysÖ

And with hundreds upon hundreds and perhaps thousands upon thousands being isolated; well, what about the Nov. 4 election?

And is it not just a little curious that the government ordered 160,000 hazmat suits in response to a disease that is said not to be airborne? And is it not just a little curious that a large government supplier of emergency response products specializing in "high risk events" said in a public tweet that Disaster Assistance Response Teams were told weeks ago to prepare to be activated in the month of October?

"What we are now hearing is just the tip of the iceburg as we enter October," noted the companyís Twitter spokesperson. "Ebola virus will cripple EMS and hospitals."

The government has assumed the authority to lock down and/or quarantine areas at will. Donít think it wonít exercise that presumed authority "for the greater good."

The fear hysteria will also lead to a public outcry for a vaccine. Itís a vaccine U.S. drug manufacturers hold the patent on. Millions of willing medical slaves ripe for the picking.

The masters in the dark rooms of the pharmas know exactly how to conjure up mass fear hysteria so that the people clamor for vaccinations. So we have another multibillion-dollar hoax ó like the great swine flu "pandemic" ó to bring in a demand for more vaccinations. Vaccinations that are worthless for peopleís health but that further enrich Big Pharma.

Now comes the great Ebola epidemic. Obamaís October surprise.

Hereís how you prepare for and avoid Ebola and any other disease. Load up on vitamin D3. The key to avoiding disease is immunity and the key to strong immunity is vitamin D3. The power of immunization protection comes from within. It is a healthy internal environment that protects the individual and the population.





New Damning Evidence Of Obamaís Contempt For America And Its Safety & Security: Obama has attended less than half of his daily intelligence briefings since taking office
A new report out from the Government Accountability Institute reveals why the president doesnít seem to know whatís going on: He has attended less than half of his daily intelligence briefings since taking office. First Term:. Obama had a 42.43% attendance rate for intelligence briefings. Second Term: Obama had a 41.26% attendance rate for intelligence briefings. The process of quizzing intelligence officials on matters of national security and global threats in intelligence briefings ďcannot be replicated on paperĒ by Obama just reading the reports. On Obamaís attempt to blame intelligence officials for the mess in the Middle East, a senior Pentagon official summed the presidentís claims up thusly: ďEither the president doesnít read the intelligence heís getting or heís bullshitting.Ē


New Damning Evidence Of Obamaís Contempt For America And Its Safety & Security: Obama has attended less than half of his daily intelligence briefings since taking office.

No Wonder Heís Clueless: Obama Has Attended Less Than Half Of Daily Intelligence Briefings

September 30, 2014 By Sam Rolley ó Personal Liberty Digest

President Barack Obama blamed intelligence community failures for his foreign policy ineptitude in a "60 Minutes" interview Sunday. But a new report out from the Government Accountability Institute (GAI) reveals another explanation for why the president doesnít seem to know whatís going on: He has attended less than half of his daily intelligence briefings since taking office.

"I think our head of the intelligence community, Jim Clapper, has acknowledged that I think they underestimated what had been taking place in Syria," Obama passed the buck on Monday.

In a study of Obamaís first 2,079 days in office, running from Jan. 20, 2009 through Sept. 29, 2014, compiled from the White House calendar and information gathered from POLITICO, GAI found that the president attended a total of 875 intelligence briefings over the course of 2,079 days in office.

That means Obama has attended only 42.09 percent of his Presidential Daily Briefs.

GAI also compared the presidentís briefing attendance during his first and second terms:

First Term: President Obama was inaugurated on January 20, 2009 and was re-elected in November 2012. Between January 20, 2009 and January 19, 2013, President Obama attended 620 PDBs over a possible 1,461 days for a 42.43% attendance rate.

Second Term: President Obama was inaugurated for his second term on January 20, 2013. Between January 20, 2013 and September 29, 2014, President Obama attended 255 PDBs over a possible 618 days for a 41.26% attendance rate.

This isnít the first time Obamaís intelligence briefing attendance has come under fire. In 2012, GAI reported that the president preferred to receive written versions of intelligence briefs over having face-to-face meetings with intelligence officials.

At the time, former White House press secretary Jay Carney laughed off questions about Obamaís attendance at the crucial daily meetings.

"He gets it every day, OK? The president of the United States gets the presidential daily briefing every day," Carney said. "There is a document that he reads every day when he is not ó well, he always reads it every day because heís a voracious consumer of all of his briefing materials."

But as the American Enterprise Instituteís Mark Thiessen pointed out in September 2012 (and Obamaís foreign policy aloofness has since proven), the process of quizzing intelligence officials on matters of national security and global threats "cannot be replicated on paper."

In a recent Daily Beast piece about Obamaís attempt to blame intelligence officials for the mess in the Middle East, a senior Pentagon official summed the presidentís claims up thusly: "Either the president doesnít read the intelligence heís getting or heís bullshitting."





Obamaís Bombing Campaign Is Not About A War On Terror and ISIS: It is about risking World War III with Russia, on behalf of Saudi Arabia and globalists, by cutting the legs from under Vladimir Putin
This battle has nothing to do with fighting terrorism and ISIS; it is to ensure Saudi Arabiaís regional dominance and open a natural gas pipeline that will ultimately supply gas to Eastern Europe, which currently gets most of its natural gas from Russia. This pipeline will cut off Vladimir Putinís trump card in his conflict with the West. This battle is to provide Qatar with a means to natural gas profits and to cut the legs from under Putin and destroy one of his last remaining allies in the region. Putinís not likely to take such a threat lying down, so Obama is risking World War III on behalf of Saudi Arabia and globalists with interests in the Qatar gas line. Once again the American people will lose blood and treasure and be further impoverished by a war paid for with more money printing


Obamaís Bombing Campaign Is Not About A War On Terror and ISIS: It is about risking World War III with Russia, on behalf of Saudi Arabia and globalists, by cutting the legs from under Vladimir Putin

Assad Is The Target; ISIS Is The Excuse

September 24, 2014 By Bob Livingston ó Personal Liberty Digest

The ultimate target of the new American bombing campaign is the regime of Bashar Assad. Attacking ISIS and the newly minted enemy du jour, the Korashans, is just an excuse.

The Wall Street Journal laid bare the backstage machinations required to get the Saudi Arabian kingdom ó one of the principal backers of ISIS ó on board.

Folks, the U.S. is not fighting a "war on terror." It is fighting a war to ensure Saudi Arabiaís dominance in the region and to open the way for a natural gas pipeline from the South Pars/North Dome Gas-Condensate field in Qatar to Turkey and then Eastern Europe. The American people have been lied to once again. And once again, the American people have fallen for it hook, line and sinker.

The New York Times reported Sept. 18 that the U.S. is paying "salaries to thousands of Ďvettedí rebels and has given them ammunition to boost their battlefield mettle." These rebels, according to The Times, hate ISIS, but their priority remains ousting Assad.

As for the Saudi involvement, "Syria had become a critical frontline in the battle for regional influence with Iran, an Assad ally. As Mr. Assad stepped up his domestic crackdown [on the opposition forces], the king decided to do whatever was needed to bring the Syrian leader down, Arab diplomats say," according to The WSJ.

"In the last week of August, a U.S. military and State Department delegation flew to Riyadh to lay the ground for a military program to train the moderate Syrian opposition to fight both the Assad regime and Islamic State ó something the Saudis have long requested. The U.S. team wanted permission to use Saudi facilities for the training. Top Saudi ministers, after consulting overnight with the king, agreed and offered to foot much of the bill," The WSJ reports.

In other words, the Saudis wanted the U.S. to train and equip the forces fighting Assad. The U.S. wanted Saudi Arabia to join a coalition against ISIS to give its attacks on ISIS "international legitimacy," and the U.S. military needed a base in Saudi Arabia to train opposition fighters. The Saudis agreed to supply the base and some fighter jets in exchange for a promise to equip the anti-Assad rebels.

In addition to stripping Iran of a key ally, taking out Assad will open a way for the coveted gas pipeline across Syria ó a pipeline Assad opposed. That pipeline will ultimately supply gas to Eastern Europe, which currently gets most of its natural gas from Russia. That pipeline will cut off Vladimir Putinís trump card in his conflict with the West.

So the U.S. trumped up an ISIS threat, pulled the Korashans out of their old playbook, polished them up to make them appear new, put a shiny cover on an old plan to use clothing as a terror weapon (remember the underwear bomber), and used them as the excuse to begin the campaign to bring down Assad.

This battle has nothing to do with fighting terrorism, and ISIS poses no threat to the U.S. This is a battle ensure Saudi Arabiaís regional dominance ó a Saudi Arabia that purports to be an ally of America but which played a key role in the 9/11 attacks and has been funding the very terrorists the regime is using to terrorize Americans into supporting this new war. This battle is to provide Qatar with a means to natural gas profits and to cut the legs from under Putin and destroy one of his last remaining allies in the region.

Putinís not likely to take such a threat lying down, so the "peace president" is risking World War III on behalf of Saudi Arabia and globalists with interests in the Qatar gas line.

But regardless, once again, the globalists will win and the American people will lose blood and treasure and be further impoverished by a war paid for with more money printing.





Does The GOP Have The Brains And Courage To Use This Immigration Message As A Golden Opportunity To Win A Historic Landslide In The November Elections?
The GOP message should be:†BET (bankruptcy, Ebola and terrorism). These three disasters, pouring across our Southern border, are the three biggest threats to Americaís future. An unsecured border is open to invasion by ISIS & al-Qaida terror cells. With our economy in such a weak state, any terrorist attack on U.S. soil would be catastrophic to the economy. The economy would plunge into depression. The same holds true for an Ebola pandemic. If illegal immigrants cross the border with Ebola, it will quickly spread and cause a pandemic. That would shut down commerce from coast to coast, as consumers stay home from shopping malls, theaters & restaurants. Economic collapse would ensue. Here is a short, simple, three-step plan to deal with illegal immigration. If only the GOP had the brains & courage to present this plan.


Does The GOP Have The Brains And Courage To Use This Immigration Message As A Golden Opportunity To Win A Historic Landslide In The November Elections?

The Immigration Message That Leads To A GOP Landslide

September 25, 2014 BY Wayne Allyn Root ó Personal Liberty Digest

Watch the video here óhttp://personalliberty.com/immigration-message-leads-gop-landslide/ ó or read the text of it below:

Hi Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. The GOP has a golden opportunity for a historic landslide in November, taking control of the Senate and expanding control of the House. But they must stay on message. There is no bigger winning issue than illegal immigration and our unsecured border.

Americaís Southern border is being invaded ó but not just by poor, desperate, government-dependent illegal aliens who will bankrupt Americaís middle class with their need for welfare, food stamps, housing, education, prison costs and free healthcare. The border issue has escalated far beyond that! Itís now a life-and-death issue.

Letís call it BET (bankruptcy, Ebola and terrorism). These three disasters, pouring across our Southern border, are the three biggest threats to Americaís future. They all intersect at the border. Our childrenís future is on the line. BET is the winning message the GOP must ensure Americaís voters hear.

An unsecured border is open to invasion by ISIS and al-Qaida terror cells. With our economy in such a weak state, any terrorist attack on U.S. soil would be catastrophic to the economy. The economy would plunge into depression.

The same holds true for an Ebola pandemic. If illegal immigrants cross the border with Ebola, it will quickly spread and cause a pandemic. That would shut down commerce from coast to coast, as consumers stay home from shopping malls, theaters and restaurants. Economic collapse would ensue.

The GOP message should be: "BET (bankruptcy, Ebola and terrorism). Obama is gambling with your childrenís life by leaving the border wide open. Thatís a bet the GOP is not willing to take ó for you, for your children or for our nation."

Thatís a winning message ó if itís backed up by a detailed plan. Blame alone is not enough. The GOP must provide solutions. Here is a short, simple, three-step plan to deal with illegal immigration. If only the GOP had the brains and courage to present this plan.

Step 1: Demand we secure the border before anything else gets done. There is no negotiation. Period. Barack Obama has lost the immigration issue. While they wonít admit it, Obama and his socialist cabal want millions of additional illegal immigrants to keep crossing the border simply because they see them as millions of poor, dependent, future Democrat voters. Of course, they canít admit that, so they distract voters by claiming a border wall is too expensive and canít work.

This is 2014. We donít need to build a real wall. We can build a virtual wall with high-tech surveillance: drones and cameras. No one can cross a border protected by thousands of drones with border patrol or National Guard positioned to swoop in the moment anyone reaches the border.

Obama has already created a Soviet-style surveillance state that snoops on its own law-abiding citizens. He directs the NSA to listen to all our communications without a warrant and tells the IRS to intimidate his political opponents. He wants our skies filled with drones. But when it comes to protecting our border, he conveniently forgets how to use the same high-tech tools. Drones and cameras can create an impenetrable virtual wall, quickly, and at a reasonable cost.

Step 2: After the border with Mexico is secured by a virtual wall, and only after, letís give illegal immigrants who are already here a path to become permanent legal residents (over a long period of time, meeting certain strict conditions), but never citizens.

Theyíve broken the law. Theyíve given up the right to become citizens (and, therefore, the right to vote). Millions apply to become legal citizens. Most wait a lifetime and never get in. So the compromise is that those immigrants already here get to stay. They never have to fear that knock on the door in the middle of the night ever again. They are free to work. They are not threatened with jail or deportation. They can sleep soundly at night.

What a gift. But they can never be citizens and they can never vote. Period. They gave up that privilege when they broke the law. But in return, the border is sealed forever. No other illegal immigrants will ever get in.

Step 3: The GOP is sadly disconnected from its own voters. Conservatives welcome immigrants who want to work and contribute (like the rest of us) to America. Unfortunately, immigration reform never differentiates between those who come here to work and those who donít. That must change.

No entitlements, no welfare, no food stamps, no free healthcare, must be a key requirement. Ever. Thatís the agreement. You can become a legal resident, but only if you came here to work, not to collect handouts. Thatís the key question we should be asking before we let anyone into America.

America is generous. But itís time to stop being stupid. Weíll let you in, but only if youíre here to work. We wonít let you in, if youíre here to mooch off us.

You can bet 90 percent of illegals would love this opportunity. This is the gift of a lifetime to work and create a better life for themselves and their children, while sleeping soundly without fear of deportation. Of course, 99 percent of Democratic politicians will oppose it because they donít really care about helping immigrants; they only care about more Democratic voters.

"BET (bankruptcy, Ebola and terrorism)" and the gamble Obama is taking with your childrenís life by leaving our southern border wide open ó should be the GOP immigration message to ensure a landslide victory in November. But the question remains: Does the GOP have the brains, courage or cajones to take this winning BET?

Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. God bless America.





Obama Should Be Impeached For Aiding And Abetting Arab Petro-Terrorists: "Muslims Like Obama" Spend Hundreds Of Billions Of Dollars Fighting For The Future Of Arab Oil
What we are doing in the Middle East isnít working. In fact, things are only getting worse. Why continue this terrible course and be good loyal subjects to Saudi Arabia, while Muslims like Obama spend hundreds of billions of dollars fighting for the future of Arab oil? Letís leave the Middle East to the Arabs. Letís be prepared to pay the extra buck a gallon for gasoline at least for a couple of years. Letís keep our kids out of harmís way. Letís become energy-independent and, along the way, create hundreds of thousands of new jobs for Americans. Let Islam murder itself, if it so chooses. And if that means Israel has to stand on its own two feet for the first time in seven decades, thatís too bad. It is time for the USA to stand up for what is right for the USA. It is time for Obama to quit acting like some Saudi servant


Obama Should Be Impeached For Aiding And Abetting Arab Petro-Terrorists: ďMuslims Like ObamaĒ Spend Hundreds Of Billions Of Dollars Fighting For The Future Of Arab Oil

Obama Should Be Impeached For Aiding And Abetting Arab Petro-Terrorists

September 17, 2014 by John Myers ó Personal Liberty Digest 

"[T]he White Houseís default position is to double down on the status quoÖ looking the other way while the regime terrorizes Saudi Arabian citizens, backs reactionary forces in Egypt and Bahrain, and abets violence in Syria. And, of course, avaricious arms merchants, with support from the Pentagon, continue to sell Riyadh billions of dollars in weapons." ó Middle East Research and Information Project, March 27 

It rarely makes the news when Saudi Arabia, one of Americaís closest allies, beheads nonviolent criminals. Yet in a recent PBS interview, Bill Maher quoted a New York Times story, saying 19 beheadings have occurred in the kingdom since the news broke that the Islamic State (aka ISIS or ISIL) had begun beheading Westerners.

Only when ISIS acts brutally do we notice that centuries-old Islamic laws are barbaric and inhuman, condoning acts so vile that Vice President Joe Biden said the U.S. would pursue ISIS "to the gates of Hell."

On Sept. 2, Al-Jazeera reported that there has been a spike in the number of people losing their heads in Saudi Arabia:

The Saudi Ministry of Justice has announced the execution of 26 individuals since August 4. In the seven months prior, 15 executions were carried out, bringing the total number to 41 so far this year. However, there were no executions during the Islamic holy month of Ramadan this year between June 28 and July 28.

"One theory behind the increase is that there is a backlog of cases [since the start of the year]," said Adam Coogle, a representative of New York-based Human Rights Watch.

According Sevag Kechichian, a researcher with London-based Amnesty International, the rate of executions in the first half of last year was high, before slowing down, while this year the reverse is true. One way of explaining this, Kechichian said, is that Saudi authorities may be trying to reach an annual target: at 79, the number of announced executions in 2012 and 2013 was identical.

I suspect it is necessary to keep up appearances. And letís face it: When a country has the largest of the low-cost oil reserves in the world (drilled and delivered for less than $5 per barrel), with proven pools of 267 billion barrels of sweet crude, what happens in Mecca is nobodyís business.

That is why ISIS, with only a fraction of the amount of Saudi oil reserves, can still be opposed for the outrage of the documented beheading of 1/25th as many people as King Abdullah decapitates every year.

That could all change, however, as Saudi Arabia and its giant pools of oil are being surrounded by the ISIS army bent on global petroleum domination.

Our president was "heartbroken" over U.S. journalist James Foleyís execution and said it was hard for him to hold back tears while speaking with Foleyís family. The president did have the gumption to go golfing that same day. I suspect Barack Obama was contemplative during his golf game, but not over a dead American. After all, he himself has ordered such executions of Americans with drone attacks. I suspect his concern was with the situation facing Saudi Arabia, a desert ruled by Bedouin beheaders.

Yet Saudi Arabia is the only country that in an emergency can pump 12 million barrels per day, which not only caps oil prices below $100 per barrel but prevents an explosion of inflation that could destroy all that Obama has worked for.

So Obama doubles down again and again on the corrupt, cruel and terrorist money-changers that are the House of Saud. It is Abdullah who pays off potential enemies the way Attila the Hun did.

Donít take my word for it. An Aug. 30, Global Research ran this headline: "Why Does the U.S. Support Saudi Arabia, A Country Which Hosts and Finances Islamic Terrorism? On Behalf of Washington?" The article carried these subheads: "America Has Sold Its Soul for Oil" and "Why Does the U.S. Support a Country which was FOUNDED With Terrorism."

Yet some people in Washington will support Saudi Arabia even if the leadership of that nation planned ó or at least had beforehand knowledge of ó the 9/11 attacks. Charges have been made that the Obama administration doesnít want to know the truth ó the ugly truth that Saudi Arabia, if not overtly helping ISIS, is being encircled by them.

It could be that Saudi oil is the real dirty oil in the world ó not domestic U.S. drilling and not Canadian oil sands.

North and South American oil may cost more to deliver to the gas station. But as you can see from the chart below, there is plenty of available oil in the Western Hemisphere to meet our needs, which will release us from this Arab fratricide.

Because much of Venezuela and Canadian oil sands donít pool and because American oil no longer bubbles to the surface as it did a century ago, it may for a time cost $1 a gallon more not to buy Arab oil.

Some ducks no doubt will die in oil sands collection pools and some washed-up stars like Neil Young and Daryl Hannah will be outraged at domestic drilling and the harm that may come to a caribou herd. But isnít it worth a try? What we are doing in the Middle East isnít working. In fact, things in that region of the world are only getting worse. So we can continue this terrible course and be good loyal subjects to Saudi Arabia, while Muslims like Obama spend hundreds of billions of dollars fighting for the future of Arab oil.

I say letís leave the Middle East to the Arabs. Letís be prepared to pay the extra buck a gallon for gasoline at least for a couple of years. Letís keep our kids out of harmís way. Letís become energy-independent and, along the way, create hundreds of thousands of new jobs for Americans. Let Islam murder itself, if it so chooses. And if that means Israel has to stand on its own two feet for the first time in seven decades, thatís too bad.

It is time for the United States to stand up for what is right for the United States. It is time for the president of the United States to act presidential and not like some Saudi servant.

Yours in good times and bad,

ĖJohn Myers





I Am An Islamophobe Because I Am A Realist ó Not Because I Am A Racist
I have learned that in the Middle East, the bosom of Islam (that peace-loving religion), all you have to do is wear a crucifix around your neck to be arrested. And God help you if you are a woman because Allah sure as hell wonít help you. As a woman, you cannot in many Mideast countries be on the street without a male relative, you cannot drive a car or ride a bicycle, and you damn well better have enough clothes on or the roaming bands of religious police will put you under arrest. If you happen to be gay, thatís a death sentence. Still, the bleeding-heart liberals lecture us on how we should not judge Islam. Iíve got news for you liberals, if we donít deal with Islam now, they will deal with us the way the Nazis dealt with the Jews. Apologists proclaim that ISIS is an evil group but is not a reflection of Islamic religion. The truth is that Islam is both a religion and a dangerous ideology bent on world domination.


I Am An Islamophobe Because I Am A Realist ó Not Because I Am A Racist

I Am An Islamophobe Because I Am A Realist ó Not Because I Am A Racist

September 10, 2014 by John Myers ó Personal Liberty Digest 

I grow furious as ever more apologists speak to the popular media to proclaim that the Islamic State (aka ISIS or ISIL) is an evil group but is in no way a reflection of the loving, peaceful religion that is Islam. It is time to wake up to the truth that Islam is both a religion and a dangerous ideology bent on world domination.

Not so, said the current president and his two predecessors:

ē In 1994, Bill Clinton said: "[Americans know] the traditional values of Islam, devotion to faith and good works, to family and society, are in harmony with the best of American ideals."

ē In 2002, George W. Bush said: "Here in the United States our Muslim citizens are making many contributions in business, science and law, medicine and education, and in other fieldsÖ [they are] upholding our nationís ideals of liberty and justice in a world at peace." And he said: "[Islam] inspires countless individuals to lead lives of honesty, integrity, and morality."

ē In 2009, Barack Obama said: "Islam has always been a part of Americaís storyÖ and since our founding, American Muslims have enriched the United States." He also said: "Islam has demonstrated through words and deeds the possibilities of religious tolerance and racial equality."

The truth is, Mr. Bush, we can do a head count of Muslims who live with honesty, integrity and morality. And through polling we can also approximate how many Muslims around the world are driven to lie, deceive and even murder infidels (in other words, us).

Last month, Personal Liberty reported:

"According to the results of a recent poll, support for the terror group is likely on the rise throughout the Western world. The poll, conducted on behalf of the Russian news agency Rossiya Segodnya by ICM, found that among people in Great Britain, France and Germany 2 percent say they have a favorable view of Islamic State and 7 percent say they have a somewhat favorable view of the group. In France, which has a large Muslim population, 16 percent of those surveyed say they support ISIS; among people age 18-24 in the country the number jumps to 27 percent."

In a report about the poll, Voxís Max Fisher wrote:

"This is alarming, in part because a growing number of Europeans, often from predominantly Muslim immigrant communities, are not just expressing their support for ISIS in polls: they are traveling to Syria and Iraq to join up. The ISIS fighter who killed American journalist James Foley on video last week spoke with a strong London accent. European governments are rightly worried about the implications of this for their own national security."

It is time for our leaders to wake up to the fact that there is a large segment of Islam that is a threat to our national security and that, therefore, it is time to stop pandering to this so-called "religion of peace."

After all, ISIS may be a small band of bloodthirsty murderers, but they are just one radical group that falls under the religious roof taught in mosques around the world. And as these groups kill and maim their way across the Middle East with ambitions against Americans, few Muslims will openly criticize their religious brethren. In fact, tens of millions of Muslims are in favor of killing infidels and dream of a future where Sharia law rules the world.

Yet our government seems to feel if we apologize enough, give in enough and are humble enough, Muslims will suddenly act like Buddhists and make friends with us Jews and Christians. Even the Washington neocons ó the very ones who constantly proclaim that British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain was the seed that grew to become Adolf Hitler ó cannot appease Muslims fast enough or thoroughly enough. I have bad news for these sheep in wolfís clothing: ISIS is not a few bad apples that turned to terror. ISIS is part and parcel of Islam, an ideology more than a religion, and ISIS is casting a very dark shadow on freedom and liberty.

It seems to me the entire leadership in the West either wants to pacify Islam or is afraid to speak the truth. But avoiding the truth and the true goals of so many millions will not make this threat go away. America has to identify who the real enemy is. That means accepting that both the perpetrators of 9/11 and the terrorists who recently beheaded American journalists are indoctrinated by one religion, and it sure as heck isnít Mormonism.

I Was ĎCaught Red-Handedí By Two Mormons

Last year, I was walking home with a bottle of Merlot tucked under my arm, and I came across two young men dressed smartly in dark suits, wearing crisp white shirts and conservative neckties. Clearly, the two were on a mission for the Mormon Church. In high school and college, I had a lot of Mormon and Jewish friends and was even invited to their homes for dinner on occasion. I have to admit that I liked the Jewish faith best because they wouldnít let me join and I often feel as Groucho Marx once said, "I wouldnít want to join any club that would have me as a member."

But I always enjoyed my Mormon friends ó at least when it came to playing basketball, since there was no drinking beer together on Friday nights.

I talked to these two polite young men who did seem to care about my salvation, and we had a fun exchange. I told them I thought I was a bit too far gone, but would give them time to make their pitch if I had equal rebuttal time. We had a chuckle and went on our way.

I donít get that warm and fuzzy feeling when I pass Muslims, which I do quite frequently in the city where I live. Maybe it is just me being silly; but, then again, dozens of jihadists from Calgary have left Canada and gone to join ISIS. In fact two Calgary brothers, Collin and Gregory Gordon, who two years ago lived a couple of miles from my home, were killed last month in Syria fighting for ISIS.

The National Post reported: "Collin Gordon was once an accomplished volleyball player, a sports fanatic and music enthusiast. His Twitter posts painted a picture of a fun-loving but thoughtful young man who loved basketball, electronic music and weekends."

Last month, following the video broadcast beheading of American journalist James Foley, Collin Gordon tweeted, "10/10. The video of James Foley losing his neck is the perfection of ĎTerrorism.í"

Now I am going to jump to a conclusion: The two young Mormon men I met the other day are not going to go out and murder and celebrate beheadings because of something written in The Book of Mormon. I make the same prediction for Jews and Christians and their holy texts.

I can already hear the few bad apples retort from the progressives reading this. What I want to know is why those apples are showing up only in Islamic barrels.

Liberals Ignore Their Hypocrisy When It Comes To Islam

My wife and I have a daughter-in-law who is Lebanese and who has been shunned by the traditional Muslim elements of her family for committing the sin of falling in love with our American infidel son. Another of our children lived and worked in the Middle East. I was afraid to say too much about Islam in case they would suffer the consequences.

I have learned that in the Middle East, the bosom of Islam (that peace-loving religion), all you have to do is wear a crucifix around your neck to be arrested. And God help you if you are a woman because Allah sure as hell wonít help you. As a woman, you cannot in many Mideast countries be on the street without a male relative, you cannot drive a car or ride a bicycle, and you damn well better have enough clothes on or the roaming bands of religious police will put you under arrest. If you happen to be gay, thatís a death sentence.

Still, the bleeding-heart liberals lecture us on how we should not judge Islam. Iíve got news for you liberals, if we donít deal with Islam now, they will deal with us the way the Nazis dealt with the Jews. Of course, you could always call-up the ACLU; but if Sharia law ever takes hold, there will be no ACLU.

I like to think I am fearless when it comes to writing what I believe, but even I am afraid to write too strongly about what I really think of Islam ó not because somebody will hurt me. To hell with that, come and get me. But I fear repercussions on my publisher and my family. But frankly, as I am on the downside to 60, I donít like to have to watch every word that I write in the off chance of retribution.

As for you progressives, I expect lots of messages. Yuck it up now. You have that right. But if Islam ever achieves its global goal of world domination, free speech will be something your children and grandchildren will not have; and you will have contributed to that end.

Yours in good times and bad,

ĖJohn Myers





These 9/11 Questions Remain Unanswered
Can you address the questions in the above article and still undoubtedly believe that what we were told about 9/11 is the truth? Additional questions: Did a pending SEC investigation into top government officials have anything to do with the destruction of WTC Building 7 that contained vital information for that investigation? No airplane flew into that building. Why did all three buildings have traces of thermite explosive around the remains of their steel support columns? Burning jet fuel does not reach a temperature high enough to liquefy steel support columns and all three buildings pancaked down identically as if in controlled explosive demolitions. Was the Pentagon a target because it contained information that needed to be destroyed concerning trillions of dollars of missing government money? The plane just happened to hit the Pentagon in the very area where that information was secured.


These 9/11 Questions Remain Unanswered

These 9/11 Questions Remain Unanswered

September 11, 2014 by Bob Livingston ó Personal Liberty Digest

Three years ago, on the 10th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, I posed a series of questions about the official narrative that to this day remain unanswered ó and largely unasked ó by the propaganda media and the elites walking the halls of power.

Here they are:

ē In the months leading up to 9/11, the United Statesí vaunted intelligence agencies lost track of 19 foreigners, most of whom had overstayed their visas, and could not catch up to them even though some of them were living with FBI informants and others were enrolling in flight schools where they sought to learn to fly ó but not land ó airplanes. They were living the high life and not showing any evidence of trying to hide. In July 2001, according to an article in Germanyís daily Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, U.S. and Israeli intelligence agencies received warning signals through the Echelon spy network that Middle Eastern terrorists were planning to hijack commercial aircraft to use as weapons against important symbols of American and Israeli culture. Yet we are told the attacks came as a complete surprise. How could this happen?

ē Papers released by WikiLeaks indicate that in the weeks before 9/11, American intelligence services were on the trail of another group of five men with terrorist ties who were staying in California. They slipped away in the days after 9/11. Were they a fifth team of hijackers who did not complete their mission for some reason? How were they able to escape the massive U.S. dragnet?

ē Two days before the 9/11 attacks, the "Lion of Panjshir," Ahmad Shah Massoud Khayin, who was the leader of the Northern Alliance in Afghanistan, was assassinated by two suicide bombers posing as journalists. In the early morning hours of Sept. 11, a van occupied by Middle Eastern men pulled up to The Colony Beach and Tennis Resort in Florida, where President George W. Bush was staying. They said they were there to interview the president, but didnít have an appointment. They were turned away. Are these two incidents related?

ē Two hours before the planes slammed into the Twin Towers, two employees of the Israeli instant messaging service Odigo received messages warning of the coming attacks, according to the Israeli publication Haaretz. Who sent the messages and why? Who else was warned ahead of the attacks?

ē At 8:44 a.m., during a working breakfast on missile defense with Congressional leaders, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld predicted a terrorist attack would come, saying, "Let me tell you. Iíve been around the block a few times. There will be another event." Did he know about the attack in advance?

ē How did that passport of Satam al-Suqami survive the crash? The plane was exploded into a giant fireball upon impact with WTC 1. Yet the passport exited his pocket or luggage and fell unharmed to the ground near the tower, where it was spotted by a passerby and turned over to police despite the bedlam going on all around? How is it that his was the only identification found out of all the passengers on the plane?

ē At 8:50 a.m., four minutes after the first plane struck, CIA head George Tenet was made aware of the crash and realized it was no accident. Yet there is no indication he made an effort to stop Bush from making a scheduled appearance at Booker Elementary School in Florida, despite the danger he may have been facing were a highly coordinated attack being carried out. Before entering the classroom, Bush paused to speak with then-National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice. Later, Bush said he learned of the first crash before entering the classroom when he saw the plane crash into the building on television. There was no video of the first crash until much later in the day, and the school principal said there was no television in the area that Bush could have seen anyway. Why this discrepancy? Was Bush lying?

ē According to media reports, a number of the passengers on the hijacked airliners supposedly used cellphones to call loved ones and authorities. But cellphone technology in 2001 didnít allow the use of phones above 10,000 feet. How were the calls possible?

ē Witnesses reported seeing a white jet that looked like a fighter plane trailing United Airlines Flight 93, and a sonic boom was reported in the area over Pennsylvania. Was there a second plane? If so, where did it come from?

ē Some witnesses also reported seeing Flight 93 on fire before it crashed into the field. Why were these witnesses hushed up and why werenít they allowed to testify for the 9/11 Commission? What was the plane they saw and did it shoot down Flight 93 upon orders from Vice President Dick Cheney?

ē If the plane flew into the ground intact, how did a large portion of the engine fall more than a mile away from the crash site? How did lighter debris wind up as far as eight miles away?

ē In the days following the attacks, at least 60 Israeli citizens were arrested and held secretly ó some of them with ties to Israeli military and intelligence. Fox Newsí Carl Cameron was the first mainstream reporter to break the news. It was weeks later before other mainstream news outlets picked up on it. His four-part series that provided evidence that the Israelis had foreknowledge of the 9/11 attacks has been scrubbed from Fox News. Who were these Israelis, what did they know and what became of them? Why did Fox News scrub the stories?

ē The North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) is tasked with protecting American airspace. Yet even though the Federal Aviation Administration notified NORAD of the hijacking of American Airlines Flight 11 at 8:38 a.m. and other flights in the minutes that followed, it wasnít until long after the last plane hit the ground that NORAD planes showed up. Where were they and why did NORAD sit on news of the hijacked planes for several minutes (which NORAD admits to but wonít explain) before scrambling any fighters?

ē When the 9/11 Commission tried to get answers to these questions, NORAD stonewalled and its representatives lied. What were they covering up and why? Why do they continue to stonewall to this day?

ē Firefighters and reporters arriving on the scene of the WTC fires claim to have heard numerous explosions before the buildings collapsed. What caused the explosions? Were they deliberately set to bring down the Twin Towers?

ē How did fires cause two skyscrapers to fall? Itís the first time fire ever brought down a skyscraper, and it happened to three buildings in one day. Why did they pancake down as if in a controlled demolition? If fire weakened the support beams, as the official stories suggest, why didnít the towers fall to one side or the other, rather than pancake down as if in a controlled event? Many engineers and architects at AE911Truth.org say it could not have happened as weíre told. Why are they being ignored? Better yet, if these architects and engineers are lying about their theories, ask yourself what they stand to gain from lying and what is their motive.

ē Traces of an explosive called thermite were found in the rubble of the WTC, and melted steel was found beneath the columns. What is the source of the thermite and what caused the steel to liquefy? Burning jet fuel does not reach a temperature high enough to liquefy steel.

ē What caused WTC Building 7 to fall?

ē The maneuver required to fly an airliner at the trajectory of the one that hit the Pentagon would be difficult for an experienced pilot, and some of the air traffic controllers watching the flight believed it to be a military aircraft at the time. How did a terrorist with limited ó and by all accounts very poor ó flying ability pull off such a maneuver without crashing into the ground prior to reaching the Pentagon?

ē Why was the hole in the Pentagon wall too small to accommodate an airliner ó both in width and height? Why were no identifiable parts of a Boeing 757 found at the crash site? Why was an engine turbofan from an A3 Skywarrior found at the crash scene? If Flight 77 did not crash into the Pentagon, what happened to it and its passengers and crew?

ē In the weeks and months after the attack, men alleged to have been the hijackers and supposed to have died in the attacks began turning up alive. At least seven of them have been seen since 9/11 and one was found to have died prior to 9/11 in an airplane crash. What is the explanation for this?

ē Why did Bush begin talking to cabinet members about attacking Iraq while the Afghanistan attack was being formulated?

ē If we attacked Afghanistan with the intention of defeating al-Qaida and killing Osama bin Laden, why are we still there? Al-Qaida is no longer in Afghanistan and bin Laden is reportedly dead.

ē Why did the Pentagon participate in a cover-up and attempt to mislead the 9/11 Commission?

ē Why do members of the 9/11 Commission believe there are still many unanswered questions regarding the events of that day? Why did Commission members say they believed the Commission was set up to fail? Why have there been no charges of obstruction filed against those who stonewalled and lied to the Commission?

ē Did someone or someones in government or within some shadowy quasi-governmental agency participate in or facilitate the attacks? Was it a coup against the Bush regime? Could that explain Bushís seeming confusion and his trips crisscrossing the Southern portion of the U.S. before going back to Washington, D.C.? What other lies are we being told?

ē And a new question: Whatís on those 28 redacted pages in the 9/11 Commission Report that congressmen have called "shocking?"

Why arenít you asking some of these same questions?





Parents of SEAL Hero Demand Obama Quit Over ISIS Threat
"As commander-in-chief, your actions, or lack thereof, Mr. President, cost lives," said Billy and Karen Vaughn. As you bumble about in your golf cart, slapping on a happy face and fist-pounding your buddies, your cowardly lack of leadership has left a gaping hole ó not only in Americaís security but the security of the entire globe. Your message has come across loud and clear, sir: You are not up to this job. You know it. We know it. The world knows it. Please vacate the peopleís house and allow a man or woman of courage and substance to seize the reins of this out-of-control thug-fest and regain the balance we, America, have provided throughout our great history. You, sir, are the JV team. Itís time for you to step down and allow a true leader to restore our honor and protect our sons and daughters. America has always been exceptional. And she will be again. You, Mr. President, are a bump in our road.Ē


Parents of SEAL Hero Demand Obama Quit Over ISIS Threat

Parents of SEAL Hero Demand Obama Quit Over ISIS Threat

Newsmax ó Tuesday, September 2, 2014

By: Drew MacKenzie

The parents of a  SEAL Team 6 member who died in Afghanistan have called on President Barack Obama to resign, saying that his "cowardly lack of leadership" in handling the barbaric Islamic State threatens U.S. and global security.

 In an open letter published at WorldTribune.com, Billy and Karen Vaughn, whose son Aaron died in 2011, wrote that they were stunned by Obamaís decision to go golfing directly after giving a somber speech about the beheading of American journalist James Foley by the jihadists, also known as ISIS.



"As commander-in-chief, your actions, or lack thereof, Mr. President, cost lives," said the Vaughns, whose son was killed in action when a Chinook helicopter was shot down over Afghanistan with 30 American soldiers on board.



"As you bumble about in your golf cart, slapping on a happy face and fist-pounding your buddies, your cowardly lack of leadership has left a gaping hole ó not only in Americaís security but the security of the entire globe. Your message has come across loud and clear, sir: You are not up to this job. You know it. We know it. The world knows it.



"Please vacate the peopleís house and allow a man or woman of courage and substance to seize the reins of this out-of-control thug-fest and regain the balance we, America, have provided throughout our great history.

"

The Vaughns, whose son was Special Operations Chief of the SEALs unit that killed al-Qaida terror leader Osama Bin Laden during a Pakistan raid in March 2011, went on to say that Obamaís administration has "lurched from one disaster to another."

 

They wrote, "Never in my lifetime have I witnessed such despair and such growing fear that the worldís last best hope, America, has finally been dismantled.

 

"You spearheaded the ambitious rush to end the wars in both Iraq and Afghanistan, with no plan on how to do so effectively. Also, the release of 'the Taliban five' in exchange for one American, without consulting Congress, is also on your shoulders.

 

"You have been at the helm during unprecedented national security leaks ó including, but not limited to the outing of SEAL Team 6 on the bin Laden raid, the outing of the Pakistani doctor who provided the intelligence for that raid, the outing of Afghanistanís CIA station chief, and the outing of your personal 'kill list' to make you look tough."



The Vaughns said that after Foleyís execution by ISIS savages, they were left with "a level of rage known only to those of us who have sacrificed unspeakable offerings on the altar of world peace."



Noting that their "offering" was their son, they added, "Now we have this recent, heinous event, the beheading of an American citizen by a barbaric organization you foolishly referred to as 'the JV team.'



"You, sir, are the JV team. Itís time for you to step down and allow a true leader to restore our honor and protect our sons and daughters. America has always been exceptional. And she will be again. You, Mr. President, are a bump in our road."



Billy Vaughn, author of "Betrayed: The Shocking True Story of Extortion 17," also told MailOnline that heís angry at the way Obama conducts his news conferences. 

"I'd like to see him have some passion about anything going on in the world instead of just speaking in a monotone voice like he has a script that has been made up," Vaughn said.





Is President Obama An Agent For Islamists The Way King Edward VIII Was For The Nazis?: ďThe future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.Ē ó Barack Obama
Islam is becoming more extreme with each passing year and with only token impediment from Obama. Is he a Muslim helping Islam achieve global domination? Islam at its marrow is the evildoer. It isnít because the majority of Muslims are involved in a global jihad; they are a very small minority. Itís because more than 90% of Muslims refuse to speak out against the barbaric goals of the terrorists in their ranks. In many ways radical Islam is no different than Nazism of the 1930s. But rather than a single race following the evil edict of Adolf Hitler, evil & radical Islam is driven by 250 million radical Muslims devoted not to a man & twisted hate & political dogma, but to their god, their prophet and even their imam. To go against them & the Quran does not risk jail or execution but the eternal damnation of hellfire.


Is President Obama An Agent For Islamists The Way King Edward VIII Was For The Nazis?: ďThe future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.Ē ó Barack Obama

Is President Obama An Agent For Islamists The Way King Edward VIII Was For The Nazis?

August 27, 2014 by John Myers ó Personal Liberty Digest

"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." ó Barack Obama

"The two people who have caused me the most trouble in my life are Wallis Simpson and Hitler." ó Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother

Islam is becoming more extreme with each passing year and with only token impediment from President Barack Obama. I believe the president is either naÔve or he is purposely helping Islamic aspirations for global domination.

That there is something wrong at the White House is becoming apparent in the wake of the cancer that can be seen in the growing violence in the Middle East by the Islamic State. The terrorist group also known as ISIS or ISIL is a cancer that is a long-term threat to all of us. It is a cancer whose virility can be diagnosed by the gruesome beheading of American photojournalist James Foley, reportedly by a born and bred Englishman who joined ISIS and is now a wanted traitor.

Still, apologists say this and every other terror attack and broadcast execution have nothing to do with Islam. Rather, such acts are the work of terrorists or ó as former President George W. Bush called the 9/11 terrorists ó "evildoers."

News flash: Islam at its marrow is the evildoer. It isnít because the majority of Muslims are involved in a global jihad. In truth, they are a very small minority. Instead, itís because more than 90 percent of Muslims refuse to speak out against the barbaric goals of the terrorists in their ranks.

In many ways radical Islam is no different than Nazism of the 1930s. But rather than a single race following the evil edict of Adolf Hitler, evil and radical Islam is driven by millions of Muslims following the teachings of the Quran.

Liberalism brings with it an army of appeasers. In the late 1930s, British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain and Americaís ambassador to Britain, Joseph Kennedy, thought Hitler was a leader they could work with. Certainly, most of the 40 million Germans didnít want war. When the Nazi leadership pressed it upon them, a small minority protested and many were exterminated.

World War III may have commenced, and the apologists are doing their utmost to deny the fact that radical Islam has its sights set not only on the domination of the Middle East but also on ó within the next half century ó the world.

In an interview with Mike Huckabee, author Joel Richardson said the number of radical Muslims is as high as 250 million. They are soulless when it comes to murder and mayhem against Western democratic nations. That is a quarter of a billion people spread around the world ó some likely living not far from you, some hoping for the death and destruction of "nonbelievers" as is proclaimed in the Quran. This idea that Islam is a peace-loving religion ó as expressed by Bush and emphasized by a man I consider to be a Muslim, Obama ó puts America in grave jeopardy.

I believe that Islam is as evil and an even greater world threat to free thought than Nazism. Radical Muslims are fighting a guerrilla war in which thousands, and sometimes millions, of Islamic zealots become more radical each year and more willing to take up arms against the very peoples who provide them freedom and comfort.

Two hundred and fifty million Muslims are devoted not to a man and twisted hate and political dogma but to their god, their prophet and even their imam. To go against them and the Quran does not risk jail or even execution but the eternal damnation of hellfire.

The Traitor King

If I ever get to the pearly gates and meet Saint Peter and if I am able to get past all my sins, he might ask me what my area of expertise was. I will not say investing or energy or writing, I will say the era of World War II because I have soaked it in all my life through writings and interviews with men of both sides of the European theater of war. Yet one evening, as I watched a documentary titled "Britainís Nazi King," I realized how little of that time period I really understood. According to a respected production company, King Edward VIII and his consort, Wallis Simpson, corresponded openly with the Nazi hierarchy and even knew of Hitlerís plan to restore him as the rightful king after the Germans invaded and occupied England. This all happened as Ambassador Kennedy and many others on both sides of the Atlantic believed the defeat of England was fait accompli.

My wife, born in England and a royalist to her core, was out the evening I watched "Britainís Nazi King." When she returned home, I told her what I had just watched. She looked at me as if I had completely cracked up.

I didnít raise the subject again but read much more about it, including how Prime Minister Winston Churchill told one confidant that he believed Edward and Simpson should be shot as traitors.

My wife was shocked when a National Geographic program came on TV regarding the traitorous acts of Edward, especially when she realized that it took five decades before this revelation had been revealed by declassified FBI files.

My wife ó just as my English mother ó had always believed that the king had abdicated the throne simply because he wanted to marry an American divorcee.

That was hardly so, as it turned out. Allied intelligence had a huge case file on Edward and Simpson. Luckily, Edward had only ceremonial powers. He did not in any way direct the government or the political decisions made by Great Britain.

What if Edward had been an imperial king with immense powers? What if he had not only had dictatorial control of the empire but also a group of loyalists in his court that would have done anything to protect him? What if the aristocracy had been fully invested in him? If that had been the case, I dare say I would be writing these words to you in German.

What Did The President Know And When Did He Know It?

What if there is even a small chance that Obama is loyal to the Quran and Islam? Does that sound crazy? Itís no crazier than Edward being the Nazi king. And even if there is one chance in 10 that Obama is loyal to the Quran and Islam, it deserves consideration because Islam may be a nemesis to the West.

Factor in that there is only one chance in 100 that I am correct of the threat of Islam. Do you want to see your nation destroyed, your values upended, over one chance in a 100? Millions of people play the lottery for one chance in a million. And if a doctor said you have a 1 percent chance of having terminal cancer, how upset would you feel?

I feel very upset. Maybe you and I face only a one in 100 chance of Islam obliterating us, our children and our grandchildren. But even at that, I donít like those odds. I can only hope I am dead wrong and not a dead infidel.

Yours in good times and bad,

ĖJohn Myers





Is Barack Obama Purposely Fueling A Race War In America?
It started when Michael Brown [a black] allegedly committed a ďstrong armĒ robbery 10 minutes before his fatal encounter with a police officer [a white]. Are you really going to suggest that if a black cop had shot a white 18-year-old criminal under those exact circumstances there would be a massive media presence, rioting & looting by whites, Holder calling for an independent investigation, and Obama bewailing the loss of a white criminal's life? If you tell me that such is the case, you are either lying to me or lying to yourself. But more importantly, the results of that shooting and the urban violence that has erupted in its wake began with Obama who has concocted his version of social nitroglycerin in the USA ó By underscoring racial inequality at every opportunity while failing to create economic opportunities for blacks, and by arming large and small city police forces with military hardware that is the envy of some nations


Is Barack Obama Purposely Fueling A Race War In America?

Is Barack Obama Fueling A Race War?

August 20, 2014 by John Myers ó Personal Liberty Digest

Responding to rioting, looting and a police force that at times looked more like U.S. combat forces in Ferguson, Missouri, President Barack Obama said: "[I]tís important to remember how this started. We lost a young man, Michael Brown, in heartbreaking and tragic circumstances. He was 18 years old, and his family will never hold Michael in their arms again."

It really started when Michael Brown allegedly committed a "strong arm" robbery of a convenience store 10 minutes before his fatal encounter with a police officer. But more importantly, the results of that shooting and the urban violence that has erupted in its wake began with Obama and his bid for the presidency, in which he concocted his version of social nitroglycerin:

1. By underscoring racial inequality at every opportunity while failing to create economic opportunities for blacks,

2. And by arming large and small city police forces with military hardware that is the envy of some nations.

These two ingredients had an explosive and predictable reaction in Ferguson, and some analysts have suggested that other urban areas are a tinderbox for the violence witnessed in Missouri over the past two weeks.

A Time Before Cops Were Wannabe SEALs

In February 1986, my publisher called me up on a Sunday morning telling me he had already rented me a car and that I needed to get to it with my camera and drive hundreds of miles to Hinton, Alberta, where two trains had collided. It was one of those "I canít stand this job," moments but it became a great experience because I was the first reporter on the scene. Along the highway, just as I saw the police barricade, I pulled over the car and grabbed my Pentax. I worked my way halfway down a mountain and may have "accidentally" crossed the yellow tape the police had set up. I knew I had to quickly take pictures of the locomotives that had collided. They were still spewing smoke and emergency workers were taking body bags off the trains. I knew the opportunity wouldnít last long because Royal Canadian Mounted Police were milling around the crash. Plus, as it turned out, 23 people were dead.

Halfway through the roll, I decided to take out the film and hide it on my person. As I began my second roll, a Mountie rolled up on me and asked me what I thought I was doing. I showed him my press credentials. He politely asked me for my camera, his gun still tucked safely in its covered leather holster. As he opened up the back of the camera and confiscated my film, he apologized, saying the area was sealed off from reporters. Then he gave me the best directions to get back to my rental car.

It turned out my photos were published nationally because they were the only legitimate ones of frenzied work being carried out hours after the crash. All these years later, Iím left flabbergasted in light of the military muscle of the police in Ferguson during the first stage of unrest, including the detainment of two reporters at a McDonaldís for simply doing their job. Police forces, even in small cities, look and act like combat troops. So much for "preserve and protect." We live in an age where police are on "search and destroy" missions.

To a large extent, the Obama administration has played a large part in the militarization of police forces around the country ó a force that, when used, is held to great criticism by the president and his attorney general, Eric Holder.

On Aug. 14, under the headline "The Pentagon gave nearly half a billion dollars of military gear to local law enforcement last year," The Washington Post reported:

The events in Ferguson, Missouri this week are an uncomfortable reminder of the militarization of Americaís small town law enforcement agencies. The photos coming out of the townĖof heavily armed officers in full combat gear squaring off against unarmed protestersĖlook like images weíre used to seeing from places like Gaza, Turkey, or Egypt, not from a midwestern suburb of 21,000 people.

One of the ways police departments have armed themselves in recent years is through the Defense Departmentís excess property program, known as the 1033 Program. It "permits the Secretary of Defense to transfer, without charge, excess U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) personal property (supplies and equipment) to state and local law enforcement agencies (LEAs)," according to the National Law Enforcement and Corrections Technology Center.

Small-city cops have been given state-of-the-art sniper rifles, machine guns, grenade launchers, helmets, flak jackets and explosive-proof armored tactical vehicles, otherwise known as tanks. Even military helicopters piloted by cops with machine guns pointed at the populace fly above Americaís not-so-friendly skies.

I used to go to the boxing gym along with cops. Some of them were great guys. Some of them gave me the willies. All of them stuck together. But there wasnít one of them that I would want pointing a .50 caliber machine gun at me. And if you are comfortable with local law enforcement aiming such weapons at you, you are probably comfortable with anything.

Arms And Race

That the police feel vulnerable I understand, but that they carry such weapons I cannot understand. I also feel vulnerable in some parts of where I live and in cities I visit. If it were legal, I would still own and, on occasion, carry my Smith & Wesson 10 mm; but I was forced to sell it when I moved to Canada.

But let us be honest with ourselves and ask two important questions:

ē Has Barack Obama eased racial tensions or exacerbated them?

ē Does the TV news ó particularly CNN and MSNBC ó over-report the victimization of African-Americans at the hands of whites?

I believe the answer to both of these questions is a resounding "yes." African-Americans are mad as hell. And at least some of that blame must fall on the shoulders of Obama, who promised blacks racial healing along with economic prosperity in his 2008 presidential campaign and then miserably failed at delivering either.

In November, The New York Times published an opinion piece written by Mark Potok of the Southern Poverty Law Center in which he wrote:

Have race relations worsened since Obama was elected? The best data, two polls commissioned by The Associated Press, suggest the answer is yes. The number of Americans with "explicit anti-black attitudes" rose from 48 percent in 2008 to 51 percent in 2012, while implicit racist attitudes went from 49 percent to 56 percent. Another set of A.P. polls showed anti-Latino attitudes had climbed between 2011 and 2012.

The attacks on local law enforcement agencies by Obama for their handling of two particular incidents ó the first involving his former professor, Henry Louis Gates Jr., in the summer of 2009 and the second being the death of Trayvon Martin in 2012 ("If I had a son, he would look like Trayvon") ó reflect a president who is, at best, reckless in his comments about race and, at worse, intent to divide a nation that is already deeply divided.

This headline by Breitbart News last week blared out an ominous fact: "5 Race Riots in Obamaís Post-Racial America."

The story concluded:

These are incidents of mass violence, not merely individual crime incidents. And such incidents are testimony to the continuing sense of racial injustice purveyed by the media and the Obama administration.

And the beat goes on. Obama instructed the feds to perform an independent autopsy on Brown. (He must think the country simply canít trust those white folks in Missouri.)

Thus, we get this statement from Justice Department spokesman Brian Fallon:

Due to the extraordinary circumstances involved in this case and at the request of the Brown family, Attorney General Holder has instructed Justice Department officials to arrange for an additional autopsy to be performed by a federal medical examiner.

What is extraordinary is that the Obama administration is becoming directly involved in a police shooting. Then again, it was a white cop who shot a 6-foot-4 black man. (Brown was 18, which means he was eligible to serve the country in combat.) And from the appearances of his alleged robbery, Brown was at least on that day acting like a thug.

Is anybody really going to suggest that if a black cop had shot a white 18-year-old under those exact circumstances there would be a massive media presence, rioting and looting by whites, and Holder calling for an independent investigation?

If you tell me that such is the case, you are either lying to me or lying to yourself.

The fact is Obama is bringing all this hell to fruition. With one hand he is arming local police like they are the Marines, and with the other hand he is wiping the angst off his furrowed brow because of the racial injustice that prevails in his America. Sounds like the perfect combination for a race war and a state of national emergency.

Yours in good times and bad,

ĖJohn Myers





Do We Have A Sociopath In The White House Who Doesnít Like America And Is Purposely Fiddling While The World Burns?
Things arenít going so well for America. There was major rioting all week in Ferguson, Missouri. There are still no jobs for middle-class Americans. Our southern border is still under†siege. Obamacare is a disaster. Our veterans are dying at the hands of the incompetent VA. ISIS threatens to create a radical Muslim empire in the Middle East. And the world (from Israel to Ukraine to Syria to Iraq) is literally on fire. Where is Obama? On vacation!Ö again! Isnít his indifference to the problems of America and disconnect from reality, strange?†ďNo!Ē I believe we have a president who is an arrogant, egomaniacal sociopath. Either Obama just couldnít care less or he just doesnít like America very much, so heís purposely fiddling while Rome burns. Or like O.J. Simpson, maybe heís searching for the answers to these terrible crises in the holes of Americaís greatest golf courses.


Do We Have A Sociopath In The White House Who Doesnít Like America And Is Purposely Fiddling While The World Burns?

Do We Have A Sociopath In The White House?

August 21, 2014 by Wayne Allyn Root ó Personal Liberty Digest

Watch the video here: http://personalliberty.com/sociopath-white-house/ or read the text of it below:

Hi. Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. Things arenít going so well for America. There was major rioting all week in Ferguson, Missouri. There are still no jobs for middle-class Americans. Our southern border is still under siege. Obamacare is a disaster. Our veterans are dying at the hands of the incompetent VA. ISIS threatens to create a radical Muslim empire in the Middle East. And the world (from Israel to Ukraine to Syria to Iraq) is literally on fire.

Where is our President? On vacationÖ again. 

This time, even the media are whispering. "Where is Obama? Isnít his indifference to the problems of America and disconnect from reality, strange?" The simple answer is, "No." This is how heís been his entire adult life. It all started at Columbia University.

I believe we have a president who is an arrogant, egomaniacal sociopath.

Here is the definition of a "sociopath" from the Urban Dictionary online:

A person with antisocial personality disorder. Probably the most widely recognized personality disorder. A sociopath is often well liked because of their charm and high charisma, but they do not usually care about other people. They think mainly of themselves and often blame others for the things that they do. They have a complete disregard for rules and lie constantly. They seldom feel guilt or learn from punishments.

My new book "The Murder of the Middle Class" presents the story in vivid detail. I was Obamaís college classmate at Columbia University, Class of 1983. Iíve been trying to tell America about Obamaís "problem" for seven long years now.

By college, a personís personality, attitude and behavior are fairly well set. Thatís why Obamaís Columbia days tell us so much about his behavior as president today. Where was he? Why does virtually no one from Columbia remember the future president of the United States? Why did the future president make an impression on none of his classmates?

Things rarely change. Thirty years ago, my classmate was rarely seen. Thirty years later, he rarely is seen conducting the business of the presidency. No one should be surprised.

What do I know about Obama at Columbia? Nothing. I never met him. As Iíve reported countless times to the media, Obama and I shared the same major: political science. We were both pre-law. It was a small class (about 700 students). The political science department was even smaller (maybe 150 students) and was a close-knit group. I thought I knew or had at least met everyone in this department.

But I never met Obama. Never even heard of him. Worse, neither did anyone I knew at Columbia. Think about that. Our classmate is president of the United States. Yet he didnít leave a footprint.

In all my years of publicly questioning Obamaís absence at Columbia, I know of only two possible sightings. Two people called me claiming to be classmates. One caller claimed that he thinks he saw Obama once in a bar across from Columbia blowing smoke rings. Another called to say he thinks he saw Obama in the cafeteria at Barnard (our sister school for women only).

Two possible Obama sightings in 30 years: one smoking in a bar, the other at a womenís cafeteria. Isnít that the perfect guy to run your country?

Obama defenders and the media (I know; theyíre the same) interpreted what I said wrongly. I never said Obama didnít attend Columbia. I said he was never in class, perpetually absent, missing in action. Sound familiar?

Obama acts exactly the same today as president as he did as a student at Columbia. Obama has always believed that Obama is brilliant and better than the rest of us. Heís arrogant and detached. He thinks heís too smart to have to actually do the work the rest of us do. Heís above it all. Why attend class? "What could someone as smart as me possibly learn in class?"

Itís the same story today. Obama rarely attends meetings, even with his cabinet. Heís too busy playing golf, taking vacations or attending fundraisers.

This past February, Obama skipped two national security meetings focused on Russiaís potential invasion of Ukraine. He was too busy to attend a meeting about a crisis that could lead to World War III.

Even if Obama wasnít concerned about Russia invading Ukraine, certainly he finds Americaís jobs crisis important, right? Wrong. Obama never bothered to convene one meeting of his own Jobs Council in a full year, even with unemployment and underemployment at crisis levels.

Even more remarkable, within two weeks of that story, Obama closed down his Jobs Council ó with 12 million Americans still counted officially as unemployed.

So what is so important in Obamaís life? Golf and fundraisers. PolitiFact.com, the nonpartisan fact checker, confirmed our President golfed often and attended 106 fundraisers during just a six-month period wherein he could find no time, or interest, to attend even one meeting of his own Jobs Council.

And where was Obama the night of the Benghazi attack? Both Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Martin Dempsey testified Obama was absent that night.

Four brave Americans died while Obama was "absent." What could be so important that Obama never checked in to ask a question or discuss a rescue attempt from 5:30 p.m. until the next morning (when everyone was dead)?

The track record is consistent. Just like his college days, Obama believes heís too gifted to do the actual work of president. Heís just too busy to have to worry about the plight of unemployed Americans. Heís even too important to worry about young black males killing each other in Chicago, or being shot by police, or serious unrest, rioting and looting in Ferguson, Missouri. Heís got more important things to do than stay in touch as a U.S. embassy is under attack. Hamas is lobbing missiles into Israel. Who cares? "Iíve got a golf game in the morning."

To be exact, Obama has played 186 rounds of golf and counting versus Bushís 24.

Does Obama ever work? Sure. Every once in a while he throws a "Beer Summit."

Nothing much has changed since Columbia University. Not Obamaís personality, not his attitude, not his behavior. Either Obama is detached and just couldnít care less or he just doesnít like America very much, so heís purposely fiddling while Rome burns. Or like O.J. Simpson, maybe heís searching for the answers to all of these terrible crises in the holes and sand traps of Americaís greatest golf courses.

This is most certainly "The Murder of the Middle Class." And the death of America.

I believe we have a sociopath in the White House.

Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. God bless America.





Obama Is A Radical Islamic Wolf Clothed As A Christian: He is purposely letting Islamic extremists overthrow governments to achieve Islamís goal of world domination
The most damning evidence against Obama has been his mishandling of ISIS which is engaging in the most powerful war against Christians since the Middle Ages. ISIS stands at the cusp of overrunning and controlling the Mideast and is unlike any threat the USA has faced. ISIS is determined to build a united greater Arabia, ISISís violence knows no limits, and even al-Qaida has disavowed ISIS. Most dangerous of all is that as ISIS grows stronger, the USA is defended by the beliefs & actions of Obama, the leader of the free world, who has ushered these shameful utterances to a Christian Nation: Obama recites the Muslim call to prayer in Arabic; Obama praises and glorifies Islam; Obama states ďIslam has always been a part of Americaís story.Ē; and Obama bows to the Saudi king, yet does not bow when meeting the queen of England.


Obama Is A Radical Islamic Wolf Clothed As A Christian: He is purposely letting Islamic extremists overthrow governments to achieve Islamís goal of world domination

Is Barack Obama Aiding And Abetting ISIS?

August 13, 2014 by John Myers

[The Muslim call to prayer is] "one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset." ó Barack Obama

To borrow upon the famous quote from one of the worldís greatest leaders, Winston Churchill, during the Battle of Britain and apply it to President Barack Obamaís response to the Islamic threat that is ISIS: Never in the field of human conflict was so much harm done to so many by just one man.

Churchill and Obama: seldom have two names in one sentence been in such contrast. There stood Churchill, a patriot with a distinguished military record who wanted to take part in the invasion task force that hit the beaches of Normandy only to be ordered not to by the King of England. Churchill, was always at the ready to die for his country. Churchill was striving for world democracy and freedom.

Then there is Obama who is, at the very least, sympathetic to Islam and its goal of global domination.

The most damning evidence against Obama has been his mishandling of the Islamic State group: the most powerful jihad against Christians since the Middle Ages. ISIS stands at the cusp of overrunning and controlling the Mideast in a way that has not been seen since the Ottoman Empire ruled the region 400 years ago.

Does Anyone In Government Read History?

ISIS is unlike any threat the United States has faced. It is determined to build a united greater Arabia, and it may have the petro-wealth and determination to do it. The groupís violence knows no limits. Even al-Qaida has disavowed ISIS.

History is filled with revolutions upon which every cycle becomes more extreme, more violent.

During the French Revolution, Maximilien de Robespierre was a prominent leader who was both celebrated for the reforms he brought and despised for the terror that he helped instill ó a terror so frightful his own head was taken by the guillotine.

It was the same during the Iranian Revolution 35 years ago. Sadegh Ghotbzadeh, who went on to become Ayatollah Khomeiniís foreign minister, was part of the group of radicals who overthrew the Shah of Iran. Two years later, Ghotbzadeh was executed, ostensibly for not being radical enough. The same fate almost happened to the first president of Iran, Abolhassan Bani-Sadr, who was also not seen as religious or righteous enough and had to flee for his life to France where he is living out his old age today.

Radical Islam is on the same path and the culmination of it to date has been ISIS, which is not a group of fundamentalists whose goal is to punish Westerners because of their presence in the Mideast but rather a religious, political and military powerhouse that has been growing unchecked since Obamaís withdrawal from Iraq at the end of 2011. Given that Obama announced this move when he ran for President in 2008, all ISIS has had to do was be patient. The result is a military force that is overrunning Iraqís much larger army and now has some of the best U.S. military hardware. Its ultimate goal is not just to drive Westerners from the Mideast, but to have Islam as the dominant religion with sectarian systems of government around the world.

Bush Broke It, Obama Crushed It

Former Secretary of State Colin Powell famously dissuaded President George H.W. Bush from pushing into Iraq after American forces had driven Saddam Hussein from his occupation of Kuwait saying, "If you break it, you own it."

Carry the argument over to a piece of fine bone china and Bush did break it. And as wrongheaded as the invasion and unwanted occupation of Iraq were, George W. Bush was willing to own it and fix it as best he could. In contrast, Obama has walked away from the China shop, swept the shards under the rug as best he could, and posted a neon sign that said: "Please loot at your convenience."

That a fundamentalist group like ISIS is growing in power and prestige must be left at the doorstep of the current occupant of the White House. Some people may say it has happened out of ignorance, while others sympathetic to Obama will say it is because of his background as an anti-colonist. I say it is because he is an Islamist and a radical one at that.

Obama has downplayed the threat of radical Islam inside and outside the Mideast all along. At the Democratic National Convention he declared that al-Qaida is on the path to defeat. How right he was. What we didnít know was al-Qaidaís defeat was from an almost unopposed ISIS, which was wreaking havoc on Syria. The President had to know this through his daily intelligence briefings. He also had to know ISIS was taking aim at Iraq, a country in which America sacrificed more than 4,000 lives and nearly $2 trillion ó a sacrifice made for a country with massive oil reserves lying at the doorstep of even larger oil reserves in Iran and Saudi Arabia.

Of course, Obama has ordered a handful of airstrikes this week as he has hunkered down thinking over this Iraq crisis between golf games during his current vacation at Marthaís Vineyard. And letís not forget that in June, Obama sent 300 military advisers to Iraq. Three-hundred! Thatís a handful more men than George Custer had at Little Big Horn.

Obama: Ignoramus Or Islamist?

I donít for a moment believe that Obama is stupid, that he doesnít realize the stakes in the Mideast, including his tepid diplomacy regarding fighting in Gaza. If I am right, and if you agree with me, that only leaves us with one answer: Obama is purposefully letting Islamic extremists overthrow governments that were outlined and established by Western imperialists, regardless of the costs to the world and to the United States.

Forget what the bleeding-heart liberals and the Muslim apologists in the mass media say; growing radical Islamic elements are bent on world domination just as surely as was the Kremlin under Josef Stalin. Their message abounds and volumes have been written about it.

Below is just one example from the Minister of Interior and National Security in the Hamas government in Gaza, Fathi Hammad

"We look forward to future victories, in which, Allah willing, we will liberate our land, our Jerusalem, our Al-Aqsa [Mosque], our cities and our villages, Allah willing, all this in preparation for establishing the next Islamic Caliphate. Therefore, brothers and sisters, we are at the brink of a period of global Islamic culture, whose fuel is Gaza, whose spearhead is Gaza, its Jihad fighters (Mujahideen) and commanders are Gaza, Allah willing."

Today, ISIS with its army could soon earn $100 million per month as it seizes control of captured oil and gas facilities in Syria and Iraq.

Most dangerous of all is that as ISIS garners greater wealth and more territory, the United States is defended by the beliefs and actions of Obama, a man who is the leader of the free world who has ushered these shameful utterances to a Christian Nation:

ē Obama recites the Muslim call to prayer in Arabic.

ē Obama praises and glorifies Islam: "convey our deep appreciation for the Islamic faith."

ē Obama states, "Islam has always been a part of Americaís story. There is a mosque in every state in the union."

ē Obama bows to the Saudi king, yet does not bow when meeting the queen of England.

Obamaís words and his inaction against radical Islam show him for what he is, an Islamic wolf clothed as a Christian.

A few months ago, I wondered how much worse can things become given Obama has only two and a half more years in the Oval Office. Given his actions as President and as a sympathizer for radical Islam, things could become much worse.

Yours in good times and bad,

ĖJohn Myers





The Walls Are Crumbling Down Around 9/11; Why?
An absolutely monumental shift is in process that most have not recognized yet. The truth, or at least some truth, is about to be shown to the American masses about 9/11. Why? The most optimistic theory is that humanity has awoken and is finally driving out the truth that is too big for even the powers that be to hold back now. The most pessimistic theory is that this is all part of a greater script in which certain truths about 9/11 will be revealed. And then, quickly, a massive event will so engulf the world in chaos that it will be wiped down the memory hole. The most logical theory is that Congress will reveal a fake Saudi Arabia connection with a few fall guys in the George W. Bush Administration, orchestrated as a semi-inside job that will so infuriate and obsess the U.S. populace that the more damning evidence that Putin releases about 9/11 will be lost in the noise as the U.S. begins to go on war footing against Saudi Arabia.


The Walls Are Crumbling Down Around 9/11; Why?

Please click here ó http://personalliberty.com/walls-crumbling-around-911/ ó to read the article ó "The Walls Are Crumbling Down Around 9/11; Why?" ó and to view its video content.





Shyster Obama Is Purposely Creating A Heartbreaking Illegal Immigrant Crisis: Obama hopes to force our kind Christian Nation to make a dreadfully wrong decision under duress by agreeing not only to help the illegals, but to grant amnesty for 12 million other illegals already here
Obama wants to create catastrophe and force the American people to make a dreadfully wrong decision under duress. Obama wants our good-hearted Christian Nation to see women, children & families begging for help. He wants immigrants to be in the worst possible shape so that our hearts break and we agree to take them all in. He is purposely creating a crisis, hoping to force us to overreact by agreeing not only to help these illegals, but to grant amnesty for 12 million other illegals already here. Obama demands billions of our dollars for his purposely created crisis ó not to solve the crisis ó but to pay for lawyers for each illegal (to prevent deportation) and to reward them for their "illegal" immigration


Shyster Obama Is Purposely Creating A Heartbreaking Illegal Immigrant Crisis: Obama hopes to force our kind Christian Nation to make a dreadfully wrong decision under duress by agreeing not only to help the illegals, but to grant amnesty for 12 million other illegals already here

Send The Invasion Of Illegals To Beverly Hills And Georgetown

July 24, 2014 by Wayne Allyn Root -- Personal Liberty Digest  

Watch the video here ó http://personalliberty.com/send-invasion-illegals-beverly-hills-georgetown/ ó or read the text of it below:

Hi! Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. The massive illegal immigrant invasion of our southern border is more than just a national crisis. Itís part of the greatest conspiracy in world history ó a purposeful attempt to create catastrophe, overwhelm the system and force the American people to make a dreadfully wrong decision under duress.

Barack Obama wants our good-hearted Christian Nation to see women, children and families begging for help, begging to live the American dream. He wants immigrants to be in the worst possible shape after a long journey from Central America ó starving, injured, diseased and in such terrible shape our hearts break and we agree to take them all in.

He is purposely creating a crisis, hoping to force us to overreact by agreeing not only to help these new arrivals, but to grant amnesty for 12 million other illegals already here.

He wants us to approve government expansion and billions of dollars in new spending. Will he use that money to "solve" the crisis? No! Heíll use it to pay for lawyers for each illegal immigrant (to prevent deportation) and to hand them billions of dollars in welfare, food stamps, aid to dependent children, education and, of course, free meals at school ó all paid for by the middle class.

Itís a two-for-one. This is how you create a permanent, loyal Democratic voter bloc at the same time you bankrupt the middle class.

As I explain in my new book The Murder of the Middle Class, this is a purposeful plan right out of the Richard Cloward-Frances Fox Piven playbook. How do I know? I was Obamaís college classmate at Columbia University, Class of í83. We learned this plan at Columbia. My classmates vowed to someday put it into effect to overwhelm the system, collapse capitalism, crash the U.S. economy and force America to its knees.

From that position of crisis, weakness and panic, they vowed to "fundamentally change the country." Recognize the plan? Itís happening right now.

So how do we fight back? Obama and his socialist cabal are liars, frauds and hypocrites. Yes, they want to help the poor and downtrodden ó but only with your money.

Yes, they want to house the worldís homeless ó but only in your home.

Yes, they want to let in the worldís poverty-stricken immigrants ó but only into your backyard.

None of this "dirty work" ever touches their mansions, yachts, private jets, private schools or, God forbid, their precious children.

Last I checked, Sasha and Malia Obama wonít go to school next to shoeless illegal immigrants with lice, scabies and tuberculosis. Last I checked, illegals with gang tattoos from head to toe wonít be mugging old ladies or dealing crack in front of the Georgetown mansions of lobbyists, lawyers and politicians like Hillary Clinton.

Or maybe they will. 

Bringing this flood of illegal children (have you noticed how with liberals itís always "weíre doing it for the children?") into nice, middle-class communities to destroy their neighborhoods, schools and budgets is all part of Obamaís plan to overwhelm the system and murder the middle class.

Itís time we counter these liberal, elite hypocrites. First, we must stand and fight to the last breath. The answer is so simple: Send them back.

Then take action to secure our border.

The last thing any Republican should do now is support any form of amnesty. Are we that stupid? That message would result in millions more poverty-stricken illegals coming.

But in the meantime, letís demand these hordes of illegal immigrants ó many carry disease; many, if not most, are not "innocent minors" but are tattooed gangbangers, hardened criminals, drug dealers and murderers ó be housed in Beverly Hills, or the Upper East Side of Manhattan, or fashionable Georgetown.

Georgetown is the part of Washington, D.C., where all the liberal, elitist hypocrite politicians live. If Obama and his socialist cabal want illegals in this country, let them step over them as they get into their limos or shop for their $2,500 dresses.

But donít stop there. Letís send them to Beverly Hills, Brentwood, the Upper East Side of Manhattan, Scarsdale, Great Neck, Malibu, Westwood, Brentwood, Palo Alto, Napa, Atherton, Menlo Park, Carmel Ėand donít forget the ritziest neighborhoods in Boston and Chicago.

These rich enclaves have the money and resources, so let Obamaís socialist cabal live among the poor, huddled masses.

Give them jobs at the Ralph Lauren store on Rodeo Drive, or the Armani store on Madison Avenue, or at Saks Fifth Avenue.

Why doesnít Rachel Maddow hire one of them as the booker for her MSNBC show?

Since Obama is so quick to sue American companies for daring to demand English be spoken at the office, Michelle Obama can hire a few to work in key positions at the White House. Perhaps they can speak Spanish only, while directing national security?

Perhaps Clinton can get one of these illegals a $600,000 minimal-work job at NBC, like she got her daughter Chelsea.

Why are we sending this needy horde of illegal immigrants to struggling middle-class neighborhoods? Why are they being sent only to red States? Because this is all part of Obamaís purposeful plan to destroy America.

Letís turn the tables. Letís bus them to the elite, snobby liberal towns. If you liberals like illegals so much, you take care of them.

While weíre at it, letís demand they go to school at elite private schools. Start with Sidwell Friends School, where Sasha and Malia attend school. Letís see how Michelle Obama reacts when her precious daughters come home with lice, or cough with TB, or party with tattooed gangbangers from El Salvador.

Thereís the ticket. Itís time to turn the tables. Let the wealthy liberals who support Obama and weep for illegal immigrants practice what they preach. Itís time to send the illegal crisis to the doors of Beverly Hills and Georgetown.

Thatís how you turn around the murder of the middle class and take back our country.

Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty.  See you next week. God bless America.





Obama Is At The Center Of A Massive Fraud To Ensure That The American Middle-Class Canít Survive Without Becoming Dependent On Government
Obamacareís real objective is to make the middle class poor & dependent on government through higher taxes & higher premiums; environmental regulations & green energyís real objective is bankrupting the middle class by tripling utility bills, gas bills & grocery bills; immigration reformís real objective is to create 12 million new low-wage employees & Democrat voters and depress middle-class wages for generations to come; higher taxesí real objective is starving the biggest donors [the middle class] to conservative causes & candidates. Meanwhile, the economy goes to hell as liar Obama says things are getting better: the GDP for the 1st quarter was one of the worst in history, for the 1st time in decades more businesses are closing than starting up, record numbers are not in the workforce & getting entitlement checks ó and Obama is loving your misery!


Obama Is At The Center Of A Massive Fraud To Ensure That The American Middle-Class Canít Survive Without Becoming Dependent On Government

What Is The Murder Of The Middle Class?

July 17, 2014 by Wayne Allyn Root ó Personal Liberty Digest

Watch the video here ó http://personalliberty.com/murder-middle-class/ ó or read the text of it below:

The greatest nation in world history is being destroyed, plundered and looted by the premeditated murder of the middle class. This is no accident, mistake or coincidence. This is a purposeful plan. This is the boldest, grandest criminal conspiracy in world history.

Although the man at the center of this massive world-class fraud is Barack Obama, there are many moving parts and co-conspirators. These include famous billionaire businessmen, corporate CEOs, the Federal Reserve, Wall Street bankers, central bankers, government employee unions, the Internal Revenue Service, the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Security Agency, the Bar Association, assorted communists and America-haters, and even some well-known D.C. establishment Republicans. Itís quite a shocking list of conspirators.

Lies and fraud are at the center of this murder of the middle class. Obama and various big-government politicians need to distract the middle class from their real agenda. Lies are their weapon of mass distraction.

So they claim Obamacare is about "saving the sick and uninsured," when the real objective is income redistribution (through higher taxes and higher premiums) to make the middle class poor and dependent on government.

They claim environmental regulations and green energy will save us from global warming, when the real objective is bankrupting the middle class by tripling utility bills, gas bills and grocery bills.

They claim immigration reform is about "protecting innocent children," when the real objective is to create 12 million new low-wage employees in the labor force, depress middle-class wages for generations to come, create 12 million future Democratic voters and assign all of them lawyers at the expense of middle-class taxpayers to enrich the Bar Association, the biggest donor to the Democratic Party.

They claim higher taxes are to "create equality," when the real objective is income redistribution and starving the biggest donors to conservative causes and candidates: small business and the middle class.

They claim higher education spending is "for the kids," when the real objective is enriching teachers unions so they can funnel hundreds of millions of dollars back to Democratic politicians.

They claim bailing out General Motors was to "save jobs," when the real goal was saving bloated pensions for auto union members, whose unions kicked back hundreds of millions of dollars to Democratic politicians.

The Fed claims quantitative easing is "to save the economy," when the real goal was making crony capitalist Warren Buffett $12.7 billion richer last year ó while the children and unborn grandchildren of middle-class taxpayers owe back $17 trillion in debt used to fund a fixed craps game on Wall Street.

Itís always about lying to cover up the real agenda of murdering the middle class; redistributing wealth; making it impossible for small business to compete with big business; rewarding lobbyists, lawyers and crony capitalists; keeping politicians in office for life; and putting big government in control of our every move.

But the biggest lie of all is when politicians like Obama claim: "Itís all OK. Things are getting better. Weíre in a recovery. Look away; thereís nothing to see here."

Itís not OK. I was just notified by my health insurance company that my familyís policy has been canceled. When Obama was elected, my bill was $500 per month. Today, itís $1,700 per month. But now, my family will have no insurance at all because of Obamacare. Tens of millions of middle-class Americans will soon receive the same notice. This is no mistake. This was premeditated fraud upon the middle class.

My grocery bills have skyrocketed. How about yours? My electric bills are at all-time highs. How about yours? Gas prices have doubled since Obama became President. How can middle-class people survive without becoming dependent on government? Ah, thatís the point.

All this occurs while the economy is in crisis and collapse. The gross domestic product for the first quarter was negative 2.9 percent ó one of the worst showings in history ó six years after Obamaís trillion-dollar stimulus promised to "save" the economy. That stimulus went to Obamaís voters (the poor) and Obamaís donors (the super rich). But the bill (in the form of debt) goes to the middle class for decades to come.

No, things are not all right. Here are just a few of the facts that support that the middle class is being murdered:

ē China is set to pass America as the worldís No. 1 economy based on consumer spending this year. It will be the first time since 1872 that America has not been the No. 1 economy in the world.

ē For the first time in history, Americaís middle class isnít No. 1 in the world. Canadaís middle class has passed us.

ē For the first time in American history, more businesses are closing each day than starting up.

ē There are now 70 percent more Americans collecting entitlement checks than working in the private sector (148 million "takers" versus 86 million "makers"), a fact provided by the U.S. Census Bureau.

ē The average full-time male employee now earns less (adjusted for inflation) than 40 years ago.

ē 20 percent of U.S. families donít have a single member who is employed.

ē Record numbers of Americans are not in the workforce (more than 92 million).

ē The number of working-age Americans without a job increased by about 10 million in Obamaís first five years as President. That means each and every year of Obamaís Presidency, 2 million more Americans disappeared from the workforce.

ē Americaís second largest employer is a temp agency.

ē 70 percent of Americans believe we are still in the middle of the economic crisis or that the worst is yet to come. And they are correct.

There is no doubt the great American middle class is being murdered. We must have the courage to save the middle class and preserve the American dream. This fight is just getting started. Get informed and join the battle.

See you next week. God bless America and save us from the murder of the middle class.





Obama Flaunts His Abuse Of Power In The Faces Of The American People And Dares Us To Stop Him From Using It To Destroy Our Country: Let's shut-down and shut-up the big mouth bully with one of the most complete, effectual and simple weapons available in our Constitution
For 5 years Obama has used executive action to change & create his own laws, and excuse himself from enforcing statues he is sworn to uphold. All legislation permitting the Federal government to raise taxes or to spend money must originate in the House of Representatives. It's just this simple: If the House won't authorize it, the President can't spend it. The House of Representatives doesn't need a decision by the Supreme Court, or a vote in the U.S. Senate, to bring a halt to Obama's usurpation of power. It can do it by simply refusing to pay for it. The White House is using billions of our tax dollars to carry out Obama's goal to wreck this country. Shut-down and shut-up big mouth bully Obama & the left! ó Defund them!


Obama Flaunts His Abuse Of Power In The Faces Of The American People And Dares Us To Stop Him From Using It To Destroy Our Country: Let's shut-down and shut-up the big mouth bully with one of the most complete, effectual and simple weapons available in our Constitution

Stopping This Imperial President

July 10, 2014 by Chip Wood -- Personal Liberty Digest  

Congratulations, liberty lovers! Your efforts to expose the disastrous policies and unConstitutional usurpations of power by the Barack Obama Administration are definitely paying off.

The three key fronts where these battles are being fought are in Congress, in the courts, and in public opinion. And I'm happy to report that in the past couple of weeks, we've scored some significant gains in all three of them.

Let's begin today's analysis with public opinion, which has begun to turn decisively in our favor. The immigration crisis, with tens of thousands of children pouring across our southern border, is just the latest example of the Obama Administration's stunning incompetence°­ or worse.

Add to that the deceit and cover-up about what happened in Benghazi, Libya; the scandal over National Security Agency spying on its own citizens; and the Internal Revenue Service targeting of conservative groups. It's no wonder more and more Americans are ready to shout: "Enough!"

Of course the public is fed up with this Administration's refusal to protect our borders. What else would you expect? Every night, the TV news programs show more and more children pouring into this country, overflowing what facilities we have, with thousands being transported (at taxpayer expense) to other parts of the country.

If the Obama Administration won't protect our borders, how can we trust it to do anything else right when it comes to stopping this illegal invasion? The answer, of course, is that we cannot.

Obama's reputation is now in such tatters that in the latest Quinnipiac University national poll, he was rated as the worst President since World War II.

That's right. In a survey of registered voters taken during the last week of June, Obama ranked ahead of George W. Bush, Jimmy Carter and Richard Nixon as the worst President in the past 70 years.

A here's a real shocker: 45 percent of the respondents said that the country would have been better off if Mitt Romney had won the Presidency in 2012, while only 38 percent said it would be worse off. It should come as no surprise that Republicans and Democrats were sharply divided here, with Republicans choosing Romney by 84 percent to 5 percent and Democrats endorsing the President 74 percent to 10 percent. The biggest switch came among Independents, who this time around favored Romney by 47 percent to 33 percent. Too bad they didn't do that when they voted two years ago!

Some 54 percent of those polled said that the Obama Administration is not competent to run the government, while just 44 percent said it is. The President's approval rating was stalled at 40 percent in the survey, barely above his all-time low of 38 percent back in December 2013.

But public opinion isn't the only area where Obama has suffered some serious setbacks. He's also lost some decisive contests in the U.S. Supreme Court. In four recent decisions the Obama Administration is 0 for 4. In two of them, the justices voted unanimously against the White House. That means the former professor of Constitutional law is batting 0 for 18. Even the two justices he appointed agreed that his unConstitutional usurpations of power had to be curtailed.

Now it looks as though an even bigger challenge may be mounted to the President's illegal actions. Here's how House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) described the strategy in an article he wrote for CNN:

Every member of Congress swore an oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. So did President Barack Obama.

But too often over the past five years, the President has circumvented the American people and their elected representatives through executive action, changing and creating his own laws, and excusing himself from enforcing statues he is sworn to uphold -- at times even boasting about this willingness to do it, as if daring the American people to stop him.

Who can disagree with Boehner's accusations? Yet as the Speaker pointed out, the President's response was an arrogant, dismissive rejoinder: "So sue me."

Well, actually, Mr. President, that's exactly what Boehner said the House is going to do: "That's why, later this month, we will bring legislation to the House floor that would authorize the House of Representatives to file suit in an effort to compel President Obama to follow his oath of office and faithfully execute the laws of our country."

Frankly, I don't have much hope that such a lawsuit will succeed in forcing the President to change his ways. First of all, with all that Obama and his lawyers can do to challenge and delay such an effort, will it even be decided by the Supreme Court before the President's term of office is over?

And that's even assuming the Nation's highest court would agree with the House position, which I'm not sure is the case. Heck, if Chief Justice John Roberts could twist the Constitution enough to declare that the Affordable Care Act was Constitutional because it was a tax, who knows what he might decide here?

There is a better solution -- one that doesn't depend on a challenge slowly wending its way through the courts. And that is for the House of Representatives to wield what James Madison, the chief architect of the Constitution, called "the most complete and effectual weapon with which any constitution can arm the immediate representatives of the people."

The quotation is from "Federalist No. 58." Madison was referring to the fact that all legislation permitting the Federal government to raise taxes or to spend money must originate in the House of Representatives. It's just this simple: If the House won't authorize it, the President can't spend it.

The House of Representatives doesn't need a decision by the Supreme Court, or a vote in the U.S. Senate, to bring a halt to Obama's usurpation of power. It can do it by simply refusing to pay for it. Or as Madison put it, this is the proper way "for obtaining a redress of every grievance, and for carrying into effect every just and salutary measure."

Every great battle needs a battle cry. I want to propose one here: Defund the left!

Actually, this isn't a new slogan; I heard it for the first time nearly 40 years ago, when conservatives tried to stop the Richard Nixon Administration from paying for leftist agitators to "organize" the poor.

The White House is using billions of our tax dollars to carry out Obama's goal to "transform" this country. One of the best ways to help prevent the Administration's success is to take away its funds.

Defund the left! Let's demand that the House of Representatives start doing it now.

Until next time, keep some powder dry.

--Chip Wood





Obama, The Master Of Shyster-Disaster, ďMakes Lies Sound Truthful And Murder Respectable, And Gives An Appearance of Solidity To Pure WindĒ
Political speech is deadly & dangerous and is specifically created to be repeated over and over by the elites in order to dumb us down and create a conditioned response. The process of dumbing down and the conditioning of the mind to create a nation of good, obedient subjects loyal and subservient to political authority begins early on. We are now several generations into the plan by the elites to create a Nation of state-worshiping ignoramuses taught pseudo-history and inculcated with a loyalty to and dependence upon big government. An army of journalists is eager to spread Obamaís lies and half-truths because that ensures them their seats inside the Obama Administrationís halls of power. Politicians, like Obama, have learned that the more lies they tell, the more lies we believe. And the more lies we believe, the more dependent we become.


Obama, The Master Of Shyster-Disaster, ďMakes Lies Sound Truthful And Murder Respectable, And Gives An Appearance of Solidity To Pure WindĒ

The Magical World Of Political Speech

June 2, 2014 by Bob Livingston ó Personal Liberty Digest

"Political language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind." Ė George Orwell

I keep the above George Orwell quote near me at all times. It serves as a reminder to me to decipher political speech whenever I see or hear it.

Political speech contains magical properties. It mesmerizes the masses because it is more illusory than a David Copperfield grand finale.

But political speech is dangerous. While it sounds innocuous, it is as deadly as a bear trap hidden beneath the leaves or a siren singing her song. It can grab you suddenly, or it can ensnare you subtly. Either way, you learn too late that you have been conned and there is no escape.

The magic of political speech is not happenstance. There are change agents at work in the inner sanctums of power whose job it is to create special words and phrases that are used in political speech. Those words and phrases are repeated over and over by the elites in order to dumb us down and create a conditioned response.

The process of dumbing down and the conditioning of the mind to create a nation of good, obedient subjects loyal and subservient to political authority and to the legitimacy of the political order begins early on. We are now several generations into the plan by the elites to create a Nation of state-worshiping ignoramuses taught pseudo-history and inculcated with a loyalty to and dependence upon big government. For many ó if not most ó of the Nationís young people below the age of 25, government provided them with most of their meals while the majority of their days were spent submitting to government authority figures (teachers/principals/school officers) in rigid, structured environments that dissuade original thought.

Also aiding the elites and politicians in this effort is an army of "journalists" who never stray far from the official line of the State apparatus. They are eager to spread their lies and half-truths because that ensures them their seats near (or even inside, in the case of the Barack Obama Administration) the halls of power. On that rare occasion one of them strays too far from the party line, retribution is swift and harsh (see Helen Thomas and Sharyl Attkisson). This discourages dissent.

Politicians have learned that the more lies they tell, the more lies we believe. And the more lies we believe, the more dependent we become. Conversely, the fewer myths, lies and deceptions we succumb to, the less dependent we are and, therefore, the more liberty we enjoy.

I long ago learned the power of propaganda. I have watched as otherwise intelligent and thoughtful people have had their minds so manipulated by political speech that they acted contrary to their own best interests without a second thought. It seems that organized and sophisticated propaganda is able to operate outside the threshold of intelligence. In other words, without some imperative to trigger inquiry, very intelligent people buy into lies and myths the same as the general population. The lies and myths then become conventional wisdom. The human mind rarely accepts a challenge to conventional wisdom.

When confronted with a challenge to the established belief system, the mind closes off. When this happens, the individual employs avoidance behavior, writes off the new knowledge as conspiracy theory and labels it as kooky, insane or stupid. The information is then dismissed, never to be considered again, even when the facts support the new knowledge. Psychologists call this quirk of human nature cognitive dissonance. It means the rejection of information not in harmony with previous beliefs.

The esoteric purpose of propaganda is to extract wealth and labor illegally as concealed involuntary servitude or to steal the peopleís liberty right out from under them, and even have the populace to thank the thieves for doing so, especially if it is done under the guise of keeping the people "safe" or to "save the children" from some danger, real or imagined. Those who use propaganda to persuade the populace against their best interests create myths and sell them as benefits.

The elites also use distractions for this purpose. These distractions serve to draw the peopleís attention away from the important issues and focus it on the mundane and the trivial, much as the illusionist uses sleight of hand. These distractions can be events that occur naturally or by chance, which are then seized upon by the elites. But sometimes the distractions are artificial creations ó also called "false flag events" ó designed and triggered for the specific purpose of refocusing the attention of the populace. (Bill Clintonís bombing of a Sudanese aspirin factory at the time of his deposition in the Paula Jones case and at the peak of the Monica Lewinsky scandal is a prime example.)

Often, these distractions serve a dual purpose. For instance, the callous and senseless murder of six people by the mentally depraved Elliot Rodger on May 23 has mesmerized the populace. It has created some distraction away from the burgeoning Veterans Affairs scandal, the Internal Revenue Service scandal, the Benghazi scandal and the ongoing collapse of the economy and Obamacare. But more sinister is its use by the gun controllers and hoplophobes to once again attempt to advance their assault on the 2nd Amendment.

Congressman Steny Hoyer employed classic political speech (or doublethink) in announcing that Democrats will try to steal more 2nd Amendment liberties by expanding background checks on weapons purchases through an amendment to an upcoming bill. While acknowledging that expanded background checks would have made no difference in the Rodger case, Hoyer said Congress must do something. (By the way, half of Rodgerís victims were killed with knives and five of the 13 injured were struck with his car. Curiously, Hoyer did not call for background checks on knife and car purchases.)

There is nothing lawmakers love more than making laws, even when they know their laws wonít accomplish their stated purpose. This is particularly true of those laws that take more authority for the state, or if they enrich the fascist system. For lawmakers, the "unintended consequences" of their laws are just like gravy, because then they get to pass more laws to correct the unintended consequences. This, of course, leads to more "unintended consequences" and the passage of more laws.

Obama is a master of classic political speech. In a political fundraiser in Chicago last week, he moved from blaming George W. Bush for his problems and put the onus on the Founding Fathers.

According to Obama, he is unable to move his agenda forward because the Constitution requires each State be represented by two Senators. "Obviously, the nature of the Senate means that California has the same number of seats as Wyoming. That puts us at a disadvantage."

This, of course, is nonsensical on its face and is pure argle-bargle. Democrats control the Senate 53-45 with one socialist and one independent, both of whom vote with Democrats. However, it reveals something of Obamaís true nature. That is, he wishes to be a dictator and he detests the republican system of government our Founders gave us, but which we have almost totally lost to fascism.

But of course, in the world of political speech, such tommyrot as this is accepted as great political philosophy and applauded by the sychophants and toadies.

Certainly, the current regime has not cornered the market on magical political speech and propaganda; but it has more weapons in its arsenal than any before it.





Is Obama A Muslim Destroying America With Communist Principles?: Obamaís War Against Coal Will Cripple The USAís Energy Independence, Eliminate More Than 3.5 Million Jobs Through 2030, And Leave America In Critical Need Of Muslim Dirty Oil And Influence
Coal provides America with 70% of its electricity and America has 1,000 years of coal reserves. New Obama rules will suppress average annual coal production by $51 billion and eliminate more than 3.5 million jobs through 2030. Include the jobs that America will lose when Obama says no to the Keystone Pipeline, and America is looking at the loss of 4 million jobs. America will be forced to meet its energy needs from the Persian Gulf, that bleak desert that spawned Islam and, likely, Obamaís prophet, Muhammad. Young Americans will die, not to fight a clear and present danger to the USA but because their war is one fought for a President who is aiming to hamstring Americaís future while engineering a renaissance for Islam.


Is Obama A Muslim Destroying America With Communist Principles?: Obamaís War Against Coal Will Cripple The USAís Energy Independence, Eliminate More Than 3.5 Million Jobs Through 2030, And Leave America In Critical Need Of Muslim Dirty Oil And Influence

Obamaís War On American Coal Reveals Our Manchurian President

June 25, 2014 by John Myers ó Personal Liberty Digest

"This isnít an election; this is a coup." ó Ben Marco, as portrayed by Denzel Washington, in "The Manchurian Candidate"

President Barack Obama is with one hand kneecapping domestic coal production and with the other hand forming an alliance with Iran, Americaís most dangerous adversary in the Mideast and a country that covets nuclear weapons and Mideast domination. Yet Obama and Iranís Ayatollah are working together in partnership to stabilize the Shiite government of Iraq, which, if they are successful, will secure crude oil from that region and re-establish Tehranís dominance.

Presidents have been making deals with Mideast dictators for decades, so in itself there may be nothing wrong with Obamaís actions. It seems so clearly wrong that as Obama orders military advisers back into Iraq and prepares airstrikes, his Administration is issuing proclamations against domestic coal producers, which harvest Americaís richest energy resource and provide tens of thousands of jobs that are desperately needed.

If one didnít know better, one might think this is all part of our Presidentís plan to cripple U.S. energy independence, a plan to leave America in critical need of Mideast influence and crude.

King Coal Cut Down By Obama

Coal provides America with 70 percent of its electricity. You might think that coal would be valued by Obama because it provides so many well-paying jobs and that it would be the natural energy source for electricity to charge electric cars. (What never seems to compute to so many of the idiot Greens is that there has to be a basis for the charge for the electric car and that electricity, like everything else, isnít free.)

The United States is the Saudi Arabia of coal, with 1,000 years of coal reserves. Coal can generate the power for all things, even the grand ambition of Obama and the Greens for a million electric cars by the end of the decade. But electric cars need to be charged, and the only energy that is readily available is coal.

I recently watched Bill Maher earlier this month after the Obama Administrationís Environmental Protection Agency announced what it calls the "Clean Power Program," as well as new regulations planned against coal generators. Maherís guest was EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy.

MAHER: "Last week [the EPA] announced, I think it was called the ĎClean Power Program.í Some people called it a war on coal. I hope it is a war on coal. Is it?"

McCARTHY: "Actually, EPA is all about fighting against pollution and fighting for public health. Thatís exactly what this is."

So, yes, Team Obama is going to war against American coal, while establishing militarily and diplomatic ties with Iran to combat the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS).

Coal power plants must bend to new rules by the EPA. There is a four-month comment period on the dictates that impact coal, coal jobs and coal States. Of course, the Greens have wasted no time weighing in, telling Obama that slamming dirty coal is something they support.

Not all Americans agree the Obama Administration has tried to tiptoe around the fact McCarthy declared a war on coal for her President. And an op-ed penned by Senators John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) and Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.) and published by The Wall Street Journal pointed out that not all Americans are ready to jump on board with regard to Obamaís war on coal.

The "announcement [about the proposed power plant rules] is a dagger in the heart of the American middle class, and to representative Democracy itself," said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY).

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce also weighed in on coal power plant restrictions, saying, "An avalanche of environmental regulations has made it increasingly difficult to build and develop in the United States."

An independent study by IHS Global concludes the new rules threaten to suppress average annual U.S. gross domestic product by $51 billion and lead to an average of 224,000 fewer U.S. jobs every year through 2030.

Other studies on coal restrictions have predicted that as many as half a million jobs will be lost. Include the tens of thousands of jobs that America will lose when Obama says no to the Keystone Pipeline, and America is looking at the loss of nearly 1 million high-paying jobs, all to prevent what is still a theory of man-made global warming.

Americaís Real Enemy

There should be the bigger question: Where is America going to get affordable energy if domestic coal faces restrictions and Alberta oil sands are blocked? The truth is America will be forced to meet its energy needs from the Persian Gulf, that bleak desert that spawned Islam and, likely, Obamaís prophet, Muhammad.

Never mind that it is the worst region in the world to count on for anything other than tribal war and genocide. Remember, in the 1970s the Mideast instituted two oil embargos against the United States. The Mideast founded OPEC to bleed as much money from the West as possible for crude. And the Mideast is and has been for 50 years a breeding ground for terrorists that want desperately to kill Americans, Jews and each other.

Greens, pay attention: If global warming really does exist and if hydrocarbons are part of the reason why it exists, then Mideast crude is also at the heart of your fixation over carbon dioxide. When you get a barrel of oil stamped "Mideast Crude," it doesnít mean it burns clean.

Factor in all the carbon and other toxic pollutants created by Americaís intervention in this region; it is likely they are more harmful to the global environment than coal that is currently burned in North America. Letís not forget that for nearly a decade the U.S. used depleted uranium in Iraq and Afghanistan both in ammunition and armor. If the environmentalistís true goal is to protect human and animal life, here is a suggestion: Have your President stop using it in his arsenal.

According to Wikipedia, the chemical toxicity of depleted uranium is a million times greater than its radiological hazard. Other chemicals being used by Americaís military are not doing "Mother Earth" any good either.

Yet I expect nary a complaint about depleted uranium or any of the chemical weapons used as more Mideast wars are prosecuted to secure future "dirty" Arab oil. Nor will there be a mention of the lost lives of young Americans who died not to fight a clear and present danger to the United States but because their war is one fought for a Green President who is aiming to hamstring Americaís future while engineering a renaissance for Islam. So please tell me: Who is Americaís real enemy?

Yours in good times and bad,

ĖJohn Myers





King Obama Believes That He Can Do Anything That He Wants To Do And Get Away With It: 5 ISLAMIST mass-murdering terrorists are ďillegallyĒ exchanged for one ISLAMIST sympathizing ďdeserterĒ, who has an ISLAMIST converted father, by Obama ó a probable ISLAMIST himself
The Taliban view the prisoner exchange as a ďgreat victory.Ē A Taliban leader declared, ďWe shall thank almighty for this great victory. The sacrifice of our Mujahedin have resulted in the release of our senior leaders from the hand of the enemy.Ē Obama has emboldened our enemies, discouraged our service members and increased the danger to every American citizen. In saner times, this would be enough to start rumblings about impeachment. But, of course, we arenít living in sane times. The Federal government has become one vast insane asylum ó with the most dangerous inmates running the show. Are there still enough patriots left who want to kick ass? Weíll see this November.


King Obama Believes That He Can Do Anything That He Wants To Do And Get Away With It: 5 ISLAMIST mass-murdering terrorists are ďillegallyĒ exchanged for one ISLAMIST sympathizing ďdeserterĒ, who has an ISLAMIST converted father, by Obama ó a probable ISLAMIST himself

Obamaís Illegal Prisoner Exchange

June 5, 2014 by Chip Wood ó Personal Liberty Digest

The prisoner swap Barack Obama just arranged may be the stupidest decision to come out of the White House in the past six years.

But itís even worse than that. Itís put every member of our armed forces at even greater risk. And by emboldening the terrorists who believe they are waging a holy war against us, itís increased the danger that every citizen of this country could become the victim of a hijacking, a hostage-taking or another form of terrorist attack.

Brad Thor, a best-selling author with deep ties in military and intelligence circles, didnít mince words when he described the effects of Obamaís actions. "The President has just put a target on the back of all Americans," he warned in an appearance on Greta van Susterenís FOX News show. Thor said that our diplomats and American civilians traveling abroad are now in even greater danger of being taken hostage than our military. "Every American should be terrified by that," he said.

Needless to say, the Taliban view what has happened as a "great victory." Taliban leader Mullah Omar declared, "We shall thank almighty for this great victory. The sacrifice of our Mujahedin have resulted in the release of our senior leaders from the hand of the enemy."

In the face of a growing backlash against the prisoner exchange, guess what the Administration did? It sent Susan Rice, of Benghazi talking points fame, back on the Sunday morning talk shows. And once again, the lady told a whopper. Appearing on ABC Newsí "This Week," Rice said, "Sgt. Bergdahl wasnít simply a hostage, he was an American prisoner of war, captured on the battlefield."

Turns out that this is nowhere near the truth. Bergdahl wasnít captured on the battlefield, he walked away from his post. Several of the men who were stationed with him say he was a deserter. The New York Times reports that he "left behind a note in his tent saying he had become disillusioned with the Army, did not support the American mission in Afghanistan and was leaving to start a new life."

Doesnít sound much like an American hero, does he? But wait, it gets worse. Prior to leaving his post, Bergdahl sent an email to his parents in which he said, "I am ashamed to be an American. And the title of US soldier is just the lie of fools. Ö The horror that is America is disgusting."

Wow! Sure doesnít sound like someone youíd want to risk your life rescuing, does it? But it turns out, that is exactly what our troops in the area were ordered to do. After Bergdahl walked away from his post in June 2009, the Army mounted several operations to try to find him. At least six soldiers were killed during those efforts.

Sgt. Matt Vierkant, one of the soldiers who served in Bergdahlís platoon, was interviewed by CNN. His disgust and anger were obvious: "I was pissed off then and I am even more so now with everything going on," he said. And he added, "Bowe Bergdahl deserted during a time of war and his fellow Americans lost their lives searching for him." Vierkant says that he wants to see Bergdahl face a military trial for desertion under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

Army 2nd Lt. Darryn Andrews was one of the soldiers killed while hunting for Bergdahl. He was shot to death in an ambush while on patrol in an area near where Bergdahl vanished. When she learned of the exchange that gained Bergdahlís release, Andrewsí mother told Army Times:

"It gets really hurtful when I think, this guy was worth my sonís life? My son who was patriotic? Who was a true soldier? Who defended his country with his life? That guy was worth that? I donít think so."

Hard to disagree with her, isnít it?

Bergdahl was a private first class when he disappeared five years ago. Since then, he was promoted to the rank of staff sergeant, because that is what would have happened had he remained on duty, re-enlisted and continued to serve honorably ó three assumptions that now seem to be very questionable. Nevertheless, that is why he is referred to now as Sgt. Bergdahl, not Pfc. Bergdahl.

Faced with questions about Bergdahlís actions, Gen. Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said that Bergdahl will be disciplined if the Army finds any evidence of misconduct. "Our Armyís leaders will not look away from misconduct if it occurred," Dempsey promised. But he added that Bergdahl must be regarded as innocent until he is proven guilty. And that in any case, the military will continue to care for him and his family, as of course it should.

Make no mistake about it, the five prisoners that Obama released are all serious bad guys. Two years ago, James Clapper, who was the Director of National Intelligence at the time, described all five terrorists as "too dangerous to release." But things are apparently different now.

The United States has had a long-standing policy, respected by both Republican and Democrat Administrations, of never negotiating with terrorists. Obama has tossed that one on the scrap pile.

The President has said for years that he wants to close the U.S. Navy facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and transfer the terrorists who are being held there to prisons in this country. Back in 2009, the Senate voted 90-6 in opposition to the Obama plan.

Last year, Congress passed a law demanding that the White House notify Congress 30 days in advance of any plans to transfer any of the jihadists being held at Guantanamo. Obama signed the measure, but at the same time he issued a signing statement saying that that part of the law was probably unConstitutional and that he didnít feel obligated to obey it.

This was a 180-degree switch from what candidate Obama said when he was first running for the Presidency. Back in 2007, he was quick to denounce his predecessor, George W. Bush, for issuing such disclaimers. And he promised, "Weíre not going to use signing statements as a way of doing an end run around Congress."

But as I said, that was then and this is now. Now, Obama needed to do something to get the Veterans Affairs scandal out of the headlines and off the front page. What better way to do it than to bring home an American prisoner of war?

A year ago, White House press secretary Jay Carney was asked about rumors of a possible prisoner swap using Guantanamo detainees. Hereís what he said on June 21, 2013: "As we have long said, however, we would not make any decisions about transfer of any detainees without consulting with Congress and without doing so in accordance with U.S. law."

Guess what? Turns out that was another White House whopper.

In a classic example of too little, too late, the White House decided to call some key lawmakers this past Monday ó two days after announcing the prisoner exchange ó to apologize for the "oversight" in not notifying them sooner. Time will tell if this is enough to appease Senators Diane Feinstein (D-Calif.) and Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.), their partiesí leaders on the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence.

By his actions, Obama has emboldened our enemies, discouraged our service members and increased the danger to every American citizen. Thor said he has put a target on the back of every one of us.

In saner times, this would be enough to start rumblings about impeachment. But, of course, we arenít living in sane times. The Federal government has become one vast insane asylum ó with the most dangerous inmates running the show.

Letís hope there are still enough patriots left who want to make some big changes in this sorry situation. Weíll have a chance to do so this November.

Until next time, keep some powder dry.

ĖChip Wood





Obama Conceals His Traitorous Guilt With Yet Another Media-Ignored Scam: Benghazi terrorist mastermind given Miranda rights on American soil to silence him about Obamaís guilt in the Benghazi attack
Benghazi terrorist mastermind Ahmed Abu Khattala ó (enjoyed life in plain view of U.S. special forces for ď20 monthsĒ). Suddenly, Obama ordered his capture at the exact moment he needed to change the headlines to hide that the USA is in disarray & decline. Then Obama ordered him to be put on trial in America ó and not imprisoned in Guantanamo ó so his Miranda rights could silence his testimony about his knowledge of Obamaís fingerprints being at the scene of the crime in Benghazi ó testimony that Benghazi was a terrorist attack from Day One, that no protest of a movie was ever involved, that his terrorists used weapons supplied to Libyan rebels by the Obama Administration to kill our own brave men, and that even the terrorists were shocked that Obama never sent a rescue mission.


Obama Conceals His Traitorous Guilt With Yet Another Media-Ignored Scam: Benghazi terrorist mastermind given Miranda rights on American soil to silence him about Obamaís guilt in the Benghazi attack

The Greatest Scam Artist In History

June 20, 2014 by Wayne Allyn Root ó Personal Liberty Digest

Watch the video here ó http://personalliberty.com/greatest-scam-artist-history/ ó or read the text of it below

Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. The greatest scam artist in history has scammed America ó again. A terrorist mastermind gets Miranda rights on American soil, while a U.S. Marine hero has no rights in Mexico. Thatís par for the course in Barack Obamaís America.

Look around. America is in free fall. The Internal Revenue Service scandal is exploding: The IRS says "the dog ate Lois Lernerís emails." The very evidence that could lead to the impeachment of the President has disappeared into cyberspace. At the same moment, Obama is still taking heat for releasing five Jihadist mass murderers in a swap for a deserter. At the same moment, Iraq is crumbling. Everything we fought for, the trillion dollars we spent "liberating" Iraq, the many brave men who diedÖ itís all being erased as Iraq falls to the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS). Soon, Baghdad will fall; the writing is already on the wall. This is the greatest foreign policy embarrassment in U.S. history. Then thereís the Veterans Affairs scandal. Under Obamaís leadership, the Nation is in crisis and dramatic decline.

So what does the greatest scam artist to ever occupy the White House do? He pulls out the WMD (weapons of mass distraction). He "wags the dog" to distract the masses. He gives permission for U.S. special forces to capture the architect of Benghazi ó a terrorist hiding in plain sight for the past 20 months. Presto. The Kool-Aid drinking mainstream media call Obama "a hero." Amazing. No one can be this dumb, can he?

But the scam is much deeper than it appears. The capture of Benghazi terrorist mastermind Ahmed Abu Khattala isnít just a cover-up for the PR mess Obama is in. The capture itself is the biggest scam of all.

First, we let this Benghazi butcher enjoy life in plain view for 20 months. Suddenly, Obama decides the time is right to capture him ó right at the exact moment Obama needed to change the headlines. Pure bread and circuses. Iím surprised he didnít just call for the start of the "Hunger Games."

But the second part of Obamaís scam is far more dastardly. Obama is sending the terrorist mastermind to the U.S. instead of Guantanamo. He will be read his Miranda rights, like any other American citizen innocent until proven guilty. Why? Guantanamo was built for exactly this kind of unique situation, to house "the worst of the worst" enemy combatants and to interrogate them without the need for Miranda rights.

This scam was all planned out for months ó 20 months, to be exact. Obama wanted the perfect timing ó to hide a country in disarray and decline. And he wanted the perfect circumstances ó the man with the knowledge of what happened at Benghazi protected by Miranda.

Abu Khattala is the definition of a "high-value target." He can put Obamaís fingerprints at the scene of the crime. He can testify that Benghazi was a terrorist attack from Day One, that no protest of a movie was ever involved. He can testify that his terrorists used weapons supplied to Libyan rebels by the Obama Administration to kill our own brave men. He can testify that even the terrorists were shocked that Obama never sent a rescue mission. He can say: "We all expected to die on a suicide mission, but your President was too weak to fight back. Because of Obama, this was a great victory; and we lived to brag about it."

So how do you shut up the terrorist mastermind? You read him his Miranda rights. You tell him he has the right to "lawyer up." You protect him from enhanced interrogation. On American soil we canít touch him. No Jack Bauer-style creative interrogation. No loud music. No threats to his family. No nothing. Here itís just nice questions asked by polite FBI agents who could lose their pensions if they donít mind their manners.

Here in America a high-profile trial like this will take years to happen ó two, or three, or four years. Just enough time that Obama is safely out of office. So even if the terrorist talks at trial, which is unlikely, no one will hear about it until Obama is enjoying life as a billionaire author and global speaker at his Hawaii estate.

This is how you silence a dangerous witness for years. This is how you keep him from ever disclosing the secrets that can bring you down. You bring him to America and give him a team of lawyers. You can bet Obamaís top enforcer, Attorney General Eric Holder, will make sure Abu Khattala has an O.J. Simpson-like "dream team." Game, set, match. The terrorist provides cover for Obama. His capture makes Obama look good. But heís guaranteed to never talk.

Now compare this situation with our hero Marine being tortured in a Mexican prison. Sgt Andrew Tahmoorisi has been given no Miranda rights. He made a wrong turn at the border and wound up shackled at four points to a bed, while Mexican guards kicked him in the ribs. Then he was denied food and water. Our hero Marine has no rightsÖ for the crime of bad driving. Yet a mass-murdering terrorist mastermind is protected by Miranda rights on American soil.

Itís all going bad, folks.

Obama plays chess at a higher level. The GOP is led by weak-willed cowards and idiots. The Republican leadership is playing checkersÖ without a board. The greatest scam artist in the history of the White House wins another round.

And the death of America continues unabated.

Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. God bless America.





Will We Ever Stand Up To The Likes of Obama? Most Americans are either too cowardly, too stupid or too doped up on society's opiates to comprehend that we are becoming slaves by a power worse than what King George III subjected the colonists to
In France the government fears the people and in America the people fear the government. Few Presidents have been loathed more than Obama. Many Americans are either fearful to challenge Obama, the Orwellian nightmare of our time, or have been co-opted willfully to support a dark government that spies on the people, engages in wanton spending of the peoples's money and prosecutes foreign wars for selfish ends, against the interest of the people. That mindless pursuits are destroying American traditional values is no concern to the depraved people who hold the reins of power; their control is allowed because the populace is either cowardly or complacent. If it isn't cowardice or pleasure-seeking that enslaves us, perhaps it is simple stupidity.


Will We Ever Stand Up To The Likes of Obama? Most Americans are either too cowardly, too stupid or too doped up on society's opiates to comprehend that we are becoming slaves by a power worse than what King George III subjected the colonists to

Will We Ever Stand Up To The Likes Of Obama?

June 18, 2014 by John Myers -- Personal Liberty Digest

"Do you want to know who you are? Don't ask. Act! Action will delineate and define you." -- Witold Gombrowicz's Diary, translated by Lillian Vallee

It's said that in France the government fears the people and that in America the people fear the government. Not once in the past century has this kind of fear been more palpable than it is under the yoke of the Administration of President Barack Obama.

Few Presidents have been loathed more than Obama. A minority of Americans openly and bitterly complain that Obama is stripping away our Constitutional freedoms and demand political change. A courageous few like whistleblower Edward Snowden risk their freedom and perhaps their lives to obstruct that evil that lies within our Federal government.

The vast majority is either too stupid or too doped up on society's opiates to comprehend that we are becoming slaves by a power worse than what King George III subjected the colonists to. And while liberals continuously bemoan the enslavement and brutalization of Africans, which occurred in the distant past, they turn a blind eye to the growing enslavement that exists now. Few notice the irony that some of it is being carried out by a sitting U.S. President with Kenyan roots.

Many Americans are either fearful to challenge the Orwellian nightmare of our time or have been co-opted willfully to support a dark government that spies on the people, engages in wanton spending of the peoples°Į money and prosecutes foreign wars for selfish ends, against the interest of the people. It is in these non-declared wars that America's children are cannon fodder with nary a protest and little organized opposition.

Overcoming Fear And Fighting Back

My life's lesson that came late was don't be bullied. I had been bullied as a sickly, asthmatic child. Because of that experience, I pushed my sons into karate, boxing and wrestling. One of them asked why I didn't box if I thought they should. So I became a regular at the gym, training with and sparring younger men and sometimes decorated national champions.

Whether this scintilla of courage was worth it, I will never know. As far as I know, my children were not bullied. But, then again, they grew up in a different world than I did. What I do remember is that I was afraid when I was sparring, and I could overcome that fear only because I didn't want to be taken advantage of again.

But make no mistake; our government is taking advantage of us. It needs us to shut up and take it so it can pursue its global ambitions, including the jump-starting of what clearly was a lost war that cost $1 trillion in Iraq.

Washington recycles wars the way the movie industry recycles movies. So don't be surprised by another combat operation, whose moniker should be "Iraq III: The Quest for Arab Oil." Most will watch it, and hardly a soul will dare question it. They are a fearful, mindless, subservient majority. Many do it because blind trust of government has been programmed into them by an amoral education system, and the propaganda machinery allows the herd to feed on everything from legalized gambling to mind-altering chemicals.

That mindless pursuits are destroying American traditional values is, at best, no concern to the depraved people who hold the reins of power. And their control is allowed because the populace is either cowardly or complacent.

If a foreign power were to persecute us this way, Americans would rise up and take action. Yet we have a 21st century President -- with roots in Kenya or Connecticut it matters not -- who strips away our liberty while sending our young people to die somewhere where American involvement benefits arms contractors. Seldom is it a foreign enemy that is a clear and present danger. Instead, the enemy comprises leaders who have betrayed the Constitution and the foundation of a free America set forth by the Founding Fathers. Why do we allow this to happen? Are we too afraid or just too damned stupid?

Another Obama Argument For The Habitually Stupid

If it isn't cowardice or pleasure-seeking that enslaves us, perhaps it is simple stupidity. There is a good argument to be made for that, especially when you consider the outlandish comments of Secretary of State John Kerry after the Obama Administration released the Taliban Five in exchange for an allegedly deranged American combat deserter, Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl.

Kerry said the United States has ways of keeping tabs on those terrorists who are now in Qatar. According to Kerry, the prisoner swap was a wise decision because if any or all of these terrorists re-entered the battlefield, the United States can take them out.°°

"I am not telling you that they don't have some ability at some point to go back and get involved," said Kerry, bragging about the capacity of the Obama Administration to protect Americans. "But they also have an ability to get killed doing that."

Is it just me, or is this the most asinine argument ever made? If we apply Kerry's logic to World War II, the United States should have released the 450,000 German prisoners of war they captured back to the Nazis, knowing that the Allies could kill them next time. "Here, Hitler. Here is an entire army back."

Yet I can't find any criticism of this in the media. Nowhere did the popular press point out the absurdity of what Kerry said. I ask you why you think this is so. Is it because the media are active in selling anything they are asked to sell by the Obama Administration, or is it because they are obtuse?

Either way, it bodes ill, especially with the U.S. preparing airstrikes on populated sections of Iraq. Only a simpleton could believe this is a tactic to bring a tribal civil war to a peaceful conclusion. Yet it is exactly what the President is going to do, even though this entire mess in the Mideast was caused by the previous Administration, which planned to force American democracy upon resistant Arabs.

And consider this brain twister that somebody in the media should -- but will not -- mention. When America carries out air attacks on the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) inside Iraq, Washington will be supporting Iran's strategic goals. That means that America will, under Obama, become a member of the "axis of evil."

But not one in 100 Americans will even consider this, just as almost none considered President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney were lying when both swore Saddam Hussein was stockpiling weapons of mass destruction -- weapons they said could be targeted on the United States. It would hardly be surprising then that most Americans would in short order be convinced wholeheartedly of the necessity of new military engagements inside Iraq.

Yours in good times and bad,

--John Myers





Why America Has Fallen Into The Hands Of Tyrants Like Obama: A Welfare Society That Has Bred An Army Of Self-Righteous Leeches
There are two great enemies of any liberty-based society: the power-mad oligarchy and the idiots who make their conquests more feasible. Sadly, too many useless Americans are willing to give away everything in the name of comfort, fear or narcissism and have embraced the life of bottom-feeders ó a collective of parasites who gorge on the arteries of those who actually make an effort to better their own lives. Not long ago, there was an element of shame when someone played the system for too long and siphoned money through dishonesty and misrepresentation. Today, the welfare society has bred an army of self-righteous leeches: a subculture of overgrown brats who are actually proud to live without working, who are proud to steal from others to sustain themselves, and who brag about their ability to grab entitlements through government over-taxation of hard-workers.


Why America Has Fallen Into The Hands Of Tyrants Like Obama: A Welfare Society That Has Bred An Army Of Self-Righteous Leeches

Idiots Like This Are Why America Fell Into The Hands Of Tyrants

April 8, 2014 by Brandon Smith ó Personal Liberty Digest 

When faced with the inevitable destabilization and destruction of oneís country and culture, it is only natural to define and expose the culprit behind the chaos. The liberty movement spends an incredible amount of time and energy unmasking the criminality of international financiers and globalists, but it is important to point out that the power of the elites is entirely dependent on the ignorance and stupidity of the masses. Without a majority of thoroughly foolish Americans, there would be no base of support for the actions of tyrants. Without the mind-boggling superficiality and bias of the average citizen, there would be no fertile ground for the schemes of totalitarians to blossom. Truly, there are two great enemies of any liberty-based society: the power-mad oligarchy and the idiots who make their conquests more feasible.

Is our Nation built upon carefully crafted lies? Yes. Is our political establishment a false paradigm? Yes. Is our public school system corrupt and poisonous? Of course. But are elitists the only source of our despair? No. It is vital that we acknowledge the important part played by biased, selfish, cruel and mentally challenged persons in the destruction of all that is good in this world. There is no power over us but that which we give away; and, sadly, too many useless Americans are willing to give away everything in the name of comfort, fear or narcissism.

Do you want to see the face of this Nationís decline? Check out the video diary of this woman and understand that there are millions more out there like her:

Melissa Melton of The Daily Sheeple posted the video under the headline "íThe Fruits of Socialismí: I Canít Even Stand to Watch the Rest of this Video."

It is almost impossible to sit through the entirety of the above video. Though I laughed hardily, I have to admit as well that this was a simultaneous source of entertainment and emotional torture.

First, during the full nine minutes of the video, I was praying that the camera view would not drop below shoulder level. Who knows if this woman had enough initiative or sense to put on clothes before filming her own welfare confessions? Being forced to witness 300 pounds of stark-naked, socialist-fed cellulite is not my idea of fun. Secondly, I realize that this pink haired EBT-addicted sasquatch represents a considerable portion of the American public. As much as I despise her, I understand that she is a part of a much larger collective of parasites gorging on the arteries of those who actually make an effort to better their own lives.

I have met hundreds of people who have embraced the life of the bottom-feeder. They are everywhere. They are your neighbors, your acquaintances, your friends, your family, etc. In using the term "bottom-feeder," I am not necessarily referring to people who refuse to work within our current economic climate. I have nothing but respect for those who make the effort to break from the system and go their own way, surviving using methods that violate mainstream taboos and functioning without the aid of a bureaucratic machine. No, a bottom-feeder is someone who uses the system as a weapon to take from others while contributing nothing in return.

Keep in mind that there are nearly 50 million people in America today who rely on government-funded food stamps just to eat. That is a bewildering portion of our population, which will defend the socialization of our country no matter what the consequences.

In the view of the common socialist, it is the responsibility of the working class to give shelter to what I call the "disinterested class," the people who have no inclination to invest in their own futures and who feel that they deserve, for whatever insane reason, the forced charity of others. This may be due to delusions of grandeur like those of the woman above, who thinks her "hobbies" give her artistic license to live on the dime of strangers. Or it may be due to a misplaced sense of expectation ó a notion that they reserve the right to have their lives capitalized as if they are precious commodities. As if their existence were assured by some kind of legal mandate.

Not long ago, there was an element of shame when someone played the system for too long and siphoned money through dishonesty and misrepresentation. Today, the welfare society has bred an army of self-righteous leeches: people who are actually proud to live without working, who are proud to steal from others to sustain themselves and who brag about their ability to forage for entitlements through the unsecured avenues of government taxation. Here is yet another example of this attitude on display:

Could it be possible that the existence of the welfare class gives strength and locomotion to the machinations of the aristocracy? Could it be possible that for every person who relies on the system for survival the system fuels its continued dominance? And, if that is the case, would it not benefit the state to engineer economic collapse and conditions of poverty in order to accelerate the socialist condition?

Look at it this way: For tyranny to remain energetic, it must have a growing population of dependent citizens and a growing organization of interdependent economies. The fewer independent people there are, the more real estate tyrants have available to maneuver. This is not to say that every welfare leech contributes directly to totalitarianism. Rather, every welfare leech represents one less person who will stand as an obstacle to the formation of despotism.

Tax-dependent people coalesce into a collectivist hive, an easily enslaved piece of leverage used against independent people as a means to manipulate. When corrupt government confronts us with the argument that more power and more centralization are necessary for the "greater good" of the "greater number," these are the people to whom they are referring. So it behooves us to ask whether the "greater number" are actually worth the sacrifice of money and freedom the government demands.

Are the people featured in the videos above really products of the "greater good," or are they something else?

Is it really our job to support with our tax dollars a subculture of overgrown brats, a subculture that will eventually be used as a bartering chip designed to place us in chains further down the road? Should any of us feel compelled to throw money at a problem that will only cause us more pain in the near future? I have to say that I feel no regret in tossing such people to the curb.

In all honesty, most great revelations in human history and most great changes in social environment are triggered by the efforts of dedicated minorities. Why should the liberty movement continue to perpetuate the myth that the "greater good" of the "greater number" really matters? The mainstream is utterly devoid of value or redemption. The vast majority of Americans (and the majority of most people around the world) are waffling simpletons and spectators hiding in the dark recesses of the modern Colosseum. They exist as nothing but cannon fodder for the elites.

This might sound like a harsh judgment, but I suggest you watch the above videos again. The future we are fighting for likely will not include such people. Their survival through the harshest of times is impossible. Their lack of independence makes their demise inevitable. In the grand scheme of things, I see little utility in attempting to save them. This is why I question any liberty movement proponents who claim that our salvation requires the "awakening" of the mainstream. This goal is not only unattainable, but also a distraction.

As much as the globalists have initiated the pain and suffering of our republic, it has been the dull-witted masses that have allowed the horror to endure. Though our primary mission is to inform, it is also important that we recognize that there are limits to the "reach, teach and inspire" methodology. Those who know will always be in a minority. Those who donít know will always outnumber us. Perhaps it is time that we stop giving the dregs of the mainstream so much support and attention. Perhaps it is time we stop seeking their favor. Perhaps we should build our own culture, separate, free and industrious; and let them wallow in their own self-created misery. Perhaps it is time for a change in the status quo. For if we allow the culture of entitlement to continue as a mainstay of our Nation and a source of pride for acolytes, then are we any better than they are?

Isnít it our duty to finally say "no" to those who would pick our pockets and trade off our freedoms in the name of equality and charity? Isnít it better to end this charade now and struggle through the consequences than it is to continue the socialist lie to the benefit of tyrants?

ĖBrandon Smith





The Case For Obamaís Impeachment: Why It Should Happen, But Wonít Happen
There is clear & convincing evidence that Barack Obama has on numerous occasions willfully committed treason & high crimes & misdemeanors and should be removed from office. The crimes that led to the impeachment of both Andrew Johnson & Bill Clinton and the resignation of Richard Nixon pale in comparison to Obamaís. However, as long as there is no groundswell of opposition to Omamaís actions from the public, there will be no impeachment. As long as there is not a 2/3ís majority of Republicans in the Senate, there will be no impeachment. But even if Republicans were to come up with a 2/3ís majority, the Republicans would not have the stomach to attempt it because the sycophantic media would gin impeachment up as a racial issue and stir up street riots that would make Watts riots look like a park stroll. The ensuing carnage would likely result in the removal of the entire power structure in Washington.


The Case For Obamaís Impeachment: Why It Should Happen, But Wonít Happen

The Case For Obamaís Impeachment

June 9, 2014 Bob LIvingston ó Personal Liberty Digest

There is clear and convincing evidence that President Barack Obama has on numerous occasions willfully committed treason and high crimes and misdemeanors and should be removed from office.

The "crimes" that led to the impeachment of both Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton and the resignation of Richard Nixon pale in comparison to Obamaís. Johnsonís "crimes" were purely political. He favored a policy of benevolent reconciliation with the Southern States following the Civil War. He issued a series of proclamations that directed the Southern States to hold conventions and elections to reform their governments; he attempted to veto a number of bills establishing military districts to oversee the new State governments; he vetoed an incumbent protection act called the Tenure of Office Act; and he fired Secretary of War Edwin Stanton, who was working against him at every turn. Those moves were all contrary to the wishes of the Republicans who controlled both houses of Congress in the aftermath of the war. The impeachment vote in the Senate failed by one vote on all three counts to receive the two-thirds majority necessary to remove Johnson from office.

Clinton was impeached for perjury to a grand jury and obstruction of justice in the Paula Jones sexual harassment suit and the related independent counselís investigation in the Monica Lewinsky affair and various other Clinton misdeeds. Forty-five Senatorsóall of them Republicanóvoted to remove Clinton from office over the perjury charge. Fifty voted to remove him for obstruction of justice. Though Clinton was clearly guilty, not one Democrat in the Senate voted to impeach. And, in fact, the Senate voted 100-0 to not hear any live witnesses in the trial.

Nixon, of course, resigned a couple of weeks after the House opened its impeachment hearings over his role in the cover-up of the Watergate break-in and other allegations of his misuse of office, the facts of which were just coming to light at the time.

The "I-word" hit the mainstream media after war-loving, chicken hawk and John McCain-lapdog Senator Lindsey Graham warned Obama that Republicans would call for his impeachment if he released more prisoners from Guantanamo Bay without Congressional approval. Before that, anyone mentioning impeachment was shouted down and cast by the media and the establishment as nutty, kooky orÖ wait for itÖ a conspiracy theorist. Obama responded to Grahamís threat by having his underlings release news that another Gitmo prisoner may soon be sprung.

I am under no illusion that the impeachment proceedings are in the offing, regardless of what Obama does. Neither is Obama. Grahamís threat was as idle as an inattentive parentís threat to a misbehaving child. When you hear a parent tell his child "No" over and over, and then hear him say, "You do that once more and youíre in trouble," you know that child is never disciplined ó and the child knows it, too. This is Congress and Obama.

Neither Republicans nor Democrats in Washington, D.C., are interested in anything other paying lip service to the Constitution while solidifying their respective grips on power and transferring Americaís wealth to their favored crony partners. That is all that matters in D.C. Neither party will intentionally do anything to upset their cushy apple cart.

And the MSM, which long ago abandoned any pretense at objective journalism, are beholden to the elites and in the tank for the regime, drunk as they are on being next to the power structure. You canít expect real journalism with a lineup like this:

ē ABC Senior Correspondent Claire Shipman is married to outgoing White House Press Secretary Jay Carney.

ē CNN President Virginia Moseley is married to Hillary Clintonís Deputy Secretary Tom Nides.

ē CBS President David Rhodes is the brother of top Obama official Ben Rhodes, who is responsible for rewriting the Benghazi talking points.

ē ABC President Ben Sherwood is the brother of Obama special adviser Elizabeth Sherwood.

However, six years of this lawless regime is more than any sane person should be expected to endure. Even leftist legal scholar Jonathan Turley called Obama "the president Richard Nixon always wanted to be."

So here are my articles of impeachment ó in no particular order ó for the undocumented usurper currently despoiling the Peopleís House: Barack Hussein Obama.

ē He provided aid and comfort to the enemy by releasing five suspected terrorists and former members of the Taliban who participated in or orchestrated attacks against Americans.

ē He violated a law he signed six months prior requiring him to notify Congress 30 days before releasing GITMO detainees.

ē He has willfully and repeated violated Article I, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution by continuously amending the Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare.

ē He knowingly and willfully violated Article I, Section 7 of the U.S. Constitution by signing the ACA, knowing full well it was a bill for raising revenue that had originated in the Senate.

ē He engaged in fraud by repeatedly lying to the American people about the effects of the ACA by claiming that Americans could keep their current coverage and physicians if they chose.

ē He exercised an abuse of power by instructing, through his proxies, agents of the Internal Revenue Service to target conservative organizations and his critics for extra scrutiny and audits.

ē He participated in an obstruction of justice and a criminal conspiracy by hindering a Congressional investigation into the Internal Revenue Service targeting scandal and using Attorney General Eric Holder and the Department of Justice in that obstruction.

ē He provided aid and comfort to the enemy by ordering or allowing the sale of arms and ammunition to al-Qaida-linked terrorists in Syria and by dispatching agents of the government to advise and train in the use of the those weapons and in military tactics.

ē He failed, despite repeated requests by the U.S. Consulate, to provide the security necessary to ensure the safety of U.S. personnel and the Consulate in Benghazi, Libya.

ē He knowingly and willfully denied military assistance to Americans under attack at the Benghazi Consulate, resulting in the trashing of the U.S. Consulate building, the theft of sensitive documents and the deaths of four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens.

ē He knowingly and willfully lied and ordered his proxies to lie about the circumstances surrounding the attack on the U.S Consulate in Benghazi, thereby perpetrating a fraud on the American people in order to ensure his re-election and to cover up his illegal gun running operation.

ē He violated the War Powers Act by failing to gain Congressional approval for the military attack on Libya that resulted in the overthrow of the Libyan regime.

ē He provided aid and comfort to the enemy by using the American military and intelligence organizations and allowing the sale of arms and ammunition to al-Qaida-linked terrorists in order to assist them in overthrowing a legal regime in Libya that Congress had not declared war upon.

ē He has repeatedly made war on various Middle Eastern countries with the use of drone attacks without the approval of Congress in violation of the War Powers Act and in violation of Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution.

ē He has ordered the murders of at least three American citizens without due process in violation of Amendments 5, 6, 8 and 14.

ē He has repeatedly used the Environmental Protection Agency to contravene Congress and pass laws harmful to American businesses and consumers, in violation of Article I, Section 1.

ē He has repeatedly violated the 4th Amendment by allowing agencies under his direction to continue to spy upon, wiretap and collect personal information of American citizens who are not criminal suspects.

ē He has repeatedly violated Article II, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution by disregarding laws passed by Congress, including, but not limited to, U.S. immigration laws, civil rights laws and the Defense of Marriage Act.

ē He knowingly allowed the illegal sale of weapons to Mexican narco-terrorists that were later used to kill Americans, including border agent Brian Terry.

ē He obstructed justice by participating with Attorney General Holder in a cover-up of the Fast and Furious gun running scheme.

ē He knowingly and willfully violated Article IV, Section 4 by failing to protect the border States against invasion, and in fact encouraged that invasion through his rhetoric and with the use of executive orders that contravened U.S. immigration law.

ē He knowingly and willfully violated Article IV, Section 4 (guaranteeing a republican form of government to each State) by strong-arming, intimidating and threatening to withhold funds from the States of Oklahoma, Texas, Montana, Rhode Island and Arizona in order to coerce the people and legislatures of those States and prevent the passage of laws according to the citizenís wishes.

ē He instructed his Interior Secretary to ignore the orders of Federal courts to lift a moratorium on deepwater drilling in the Gulf of Mexico, which denied oil workers an opportunity to earn a living and damaged the U.S. economy.

ē He broke established precedent and contravened established bankruptcy law, to the detriment of the bond holders and the advantage of his campaign contributors (auto unions) in the General Motors bailout.

ē In the auto bailout, he knowingly and willfully deprived numerous auto dealers of their dealerships for political reasons in violation of Amendments 4 and 14.

ē He repeatedly transferred funds from the U.S. Treasury to his cronies and campaign contributors for use in failing green energy schemes.

ē He violated Article II, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution by appointing officers without first obtaining the "Advice and Consent of the Senate."

In his book Faithless Execution, Building the Political Case for Obamaís Impeachment, Andrew C. McCarthy notes: "Impeachment is a grave remedy on the order of a nuclear strike." Obamaís lawless Presidency has been nothing less than a nuclear strike on the U.S. Constitution, which now lies in tatters.

"Impeachment is a political remedy: even if palpably guilty of profound transgressions, a president will not be ousted without a groundswell of public ire," McCarthy writes.

In his case for impeachment, McCarthy breaks Obamaís high crimes and misdemeanors into seven articles. They are:

ē Article I: The Presidentís willful refusal to execute the laws faithfully and usurpation of the legislative authority of Congress.

ē Article II: Usurping the Constitutional authority and prerogatives of Congress.

ē Article III: Dereliction of Duty as President and Commander in Chief of the U.S. Armed Forces.

ē Article IV: Fraud on the American People.

ē Article V: Failure to execute the Immigration Laws faithfully.

ē Article VI: Failure to execute the laws faithfully: Department of Justice.

ē Article VII: Willfully undermining the Constitutional rights of the American people that he is sworn to preserve, protect and defend.

Those articles contain many of the charges laid out above. But they also include Obamaís defiance of Congressional law and court orders in obstructing the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste project, his defiance of Federal law requiring him to address Medicare insolvency, his undermining of and contempt for Congressí duty to conduct oversight of Federal agencies, his dereliction of duty by imposing unconscionable rules of engagement that endanger American troops, lying about Iran negotiations and assisting that country with its nuclear program, politicization of the DoJ, politically motivated selective prosecution by the DoJ, DoJ investigations and other intimidation of journalists in violation of Amendment 1, systematic stonewalling of Congress, abridgement of Amendment 1 in appeasing Islamic supremacists by adopting repressive sharia blasphemy standards, suppression of information about Islamic terrorism, including its occurrence at Ft. Hood, abridgement of Amendment 1 by vindictively targeting and prosecuting high-profile critics, and his abridgement of Amendment 2 by joining an international treaty despite Congressional opposition.

McCarthy notes that since impeachment is a political rather than a legal remedy, the burden of proof is different. But he also states that as long as there is no groundswell of opposition to the Presidentís actions from the public, there will be no impeachment.

Iíll go one step further: As long as there is not a two-thirds majority of Republicans in the Senate, there will be no impeachment. But even in the off chance that Republicans were to somehow come up with 66 Senators willing to remove the President, the Republicans would not have the stomach to attempt it because the sycophantic media would gin impeachment up as a racial issue and stir up street riots that would make Watts riots look like a park stroll.

The ensuing carnage would likely result in the removal of the entire power structure in Washington. And the establishment ó whether it sides with the Democrats or Republicans ó will agree it canít have that.

Update: In the wake of the growing chorus of calls for Obamaís impeachment, the GOP establishment has publicly announced it cares more for power than the Constitution.





Impeach Obama? The Democrats Would Love For Us To Try
Impeachment at this time would give Democrats something that would unite them, while at the same time switching votersí attention from all of the Administrationís scandals to something that will be presented as a mean-spirited Republican hatchet job. So many scandals have erupted recently that Democrats must feel like they are damned & doomed: Benghazi, Obamacare, IRS persecution of conservatives, the NSA spying on all of us, immigration, Fast & Furious, the VA scandal, and the Bergdahl-for-five-terrorists swap. Having an opponent bring up all of these scandals, night after night and commercial after commercial would be a Democratís worst nightmare. Thatís why, if I were a Democratic candidate, I would be praying for the Republicans to announce an impeachment campaign against Obama. There is simply no other issue that could distract votersí attention away from all of these other issues and give me a chance to win.


Impeach Obama? The Democrats Would Love For Us To Try

Impeach Obama? The Democrats Would Love For Us To Try

June 12, 2014 by Chip Wood ó Personal Liberty Digest

How much effort should members of the liberty movement devote to the impeachment of Barack Hussein Obama?

Iím going to argue not a minute and not a penny. I am convinced that beating the drums to get the House of Representative to vote on articles of impeachment would be a terrible tactical mistake that would play right into the hands of our enemies.

Now, donít get me wrong. Iím not saying that there arenít plenty of grounds for impeachment. Heck, if we had a majority of Constitutionalists in the House and Senate, we wouldnít even be having this discussion today. If that were the case, Obama would already have been put on trial for his numerous violations of the Constitution. And then found guilty.

In my column last week, I described how the latest disastrous decision of this Administration ó the absolutely incredible prisoner exchange that freed five of the most dangerous terrorists from prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba ó had led to "rumblings" about impeachment as the one sure way to stop Obama from carrying out any more of his Marxist schemes.

Then, this past Monday, Bob Livingston, the founder of Personal Liberty Digestô, published a column titled The Case For Obamaís Impeachment. Please check it out if you havenít already read it; it is the most damning list of the reasons Obama should be impeached that I have read anywhere.

Hereís how the very first sentence of that column put it: "There is clear and convincing evidence that President Barack Obama has on numerous occasions willfully committed treason and high crimes and misdemeanors and should be removed from office."

And you know what? I agree. If you read the more than two dozen specific items Livingston offered in his articles of impeachment, Iím sure you will, too. In fact, my only point of disagreement comes at the end of that superb presentation. That is his contention that if it looked like there was the slightest chance that the House of Representatives would seriously consider impeachment charges against the President, "the sycophantic media would gin impeachment up as a racial issue and stir up street riots that would make Watts riots look like a park stroll."

While I certainly donít doubt that the mainstream media, which have repeatedly demonstrated their slavish devotion to Obama, would do anything they could to protect and defend the President and discredit any effort to impeach him, I donít believe they could instigate race riots across the country because of it. In fact, I donít think the most avid racist agitators in the country today, from Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson on down, could do that.

Cutting out welfare could. Or even mounting a threat to substantially reduce it. But I donít think a movement to impeach this countryís first black President would.

So if there are ample grounds for moving to have Obama impeached (which there are) and if I donít think weíd see massive race riots as a result (and I donít), then why am I opposed to working for his impeachment now?

The key word in that last sentence is now. Iím going to argue against trying to impeach Obama at this time for three reasons.

One, we donít have the votes. While itís true that there is a Republican majority in the House, I donít think most of them would support a resolution to impeach Obama at this time. And even if they would (something I seriously doubt), there is absolutely no question what would happen in Harry Reidís Senate. The effort would be dismissed with the absolute minimum amount of discussion he could allow.

If the evidence against Obama is so overwhelmingly clear, why donít we have the votes? That brings me to my second reason: We donít have the publicís support. We donít have their support because they arenít informed enough, and they arenít (yet) angry enough.

Given time, those last two factors could disappear. In fact, the latest Obama Administration scandal at Veterans Affairs could lead to an explosion of anger that could cost the jobs of a bunch of politicians ó and some pencil-pushing bureaucrats, too.

And that brings me to my third and most important reason for opposing an impeachment campaign at this time. Right now, the Democrats are in utter disarray. Why would we want to give them something that would unite them, while at the same time switching votersí attention from all of the Administrationís screwups to something that will be presented as a mean-spirited Republican hatchet job?

So many scandals have erupted recently that Democrats must feel like theyíve been caught in a nightmarish version of Whac-A-Mole: Benghazi, Obamacare, Internal Revenue Service persecution of conservatives, National Security Agency spying on all of us, immigration, Fast and Furious, the Bowe Bergdahl-for-five-terrorists swap.

And now the biggest one of all: the shocking and shameful way this country has been treating its military veterans who need medical care. Just this week, we learned that an audit of the VA found that 57,436 veterans are currently waiting to be scheduled for some kind of care. An additional 63,869 vets had enrolled in the VA healthcare system over the past decade but have never been seen for an appointment. (Arenít you impressed with the exactness of those government numbers? Youíre supposed to be.)

These numbers are not just shocking; they are absolutely criminal. The more we learn about the lies and cover-ups and faked statistics at the VA, the worse it looks. And now weíre supposed to be glad that the government is going to take over the rest of this countryís healthcare system? God help us.

Thatís why so many Democrats running for re-election are terrified of what all of these scandals will mean for their chances. And weíre talking some big numbers here: one-third of the Senate, every member of the House of Representatives, and a ton of State legislators and Governors are at stake this November.

Hiding from one or two of these scandals would be tough enough. But having an opponent bring up all of them, night after night and commercial after commercial? Itís a Democratís worst nightmare.

Thatís why, if I were a Democratic candidate, I would be praying for the Republicans to announce an impeachment campaign against Obama. There is simply no other issue that could distract votersí attention away from all of these other issues and give me a chance to win.

Donít blow it, Republicans. You have a golden opportunity to win back the Senate, to increase your majority in the House and to add to the number of Republican State legislators and Governors. Donít give the Democrats the one issue that could salvage the coming midterm elections for them.

Keep the focus on the scandals that the American public can see and understand. Earn their support because you deserve their support. Do a good enough job, and youíll see the rewards this November.

Letís win enough victories this fall, and then letís talk about the best way to bring Obama to account.

Until next time, keep some powder dry.

ĖChip Wood





Huge Election Upset Reveals That Americans Want The GOP To Secure The Mexican Border, Dump The Amnesty Plan and Tell Obama To Go To Hell If He Doesnít Like It
Who in his right mind would even consider amnesty for millions of people already here illegally? Why would we even think of rewarding a country (Mexico) that is laughing in our face? It is sending its poor, jobless citizens to us ó so we can pay the welfare, medical, education & prison bills it should be paying. Mexico is a desperately poor country. They are trying to stick all their bills and responsibilities on American taxpayers. Obama has erased the border. Heís obliterated the law. Heís bankrupting the economy. Heís overwhelming the system with spending and debt. The plan is accelerating.This is the invasion of America. This is the end of the GOP. Cantor, are you blind, deaf and dumb? GOP leaders like Eric Cantor are either complete idiots, cowards afraid of their own shadow or traitors complicit in the destruction of America


Huge Election Upset Reveals That Americans Want The GOP To Secure The Mexican Border, Dump The Amnesty Plan and Tell Obama To Go To Hell If He Doesnít Like It

How Mexico Defeated GOP Majority Leader Eric Cantor

June 13, 2014 by Wayne Allyn Root ó Personal Liberty Digest  

Watch the video here ó http://personalliberty.com/mexico-defeated-gop-majority-leader-eric-cantor/ ó or read the text of it below:

Hello, Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. U.S. Congress Majority Leader Eric Cantor just lost in perhaps the biggest upset in the history of politics in his country. In D.C. they donít understand what just happened. Well, Iíll tell you what happened.

Iíve written about the plight of U.S. Marine Sgt. Andrew Tahmooressi. Heís being falsely imprisoned by our "friend" and neighbor, Mexico. Heís been mistreated, beaten and, some would say, tortured. Isnít it time President Barack Obama did something? Isnít it time for GOP leaders to demand action?

What does this have to do with Cantorís stunning defeat? Everything. The people who represent us in Washington, D.C., are off the grid. They are tone-deaf. They donít care about what "we the people" care about. Cantor probably doesnít even know about our hero Marine stuck in a Mexican prison. And thatís the problem. Our leaders are out of touch with the people ó and with reality.

Separate from the plight of our hero Marine in Mexico, we have an invasion going on right now on the Mexican border.

Our borders are no longer enforced. Thousands of illegals are pouring over the border, and they arenít even bothering to hide from police or Border Patrol. They are walking into America in plain sight and searching for police. They are thrilled to surrender to authorities because they have all heard the news: Obama has created de facto amnesty.

Obama and Holder are ignoring the law of this country. They have spread the word: "Bring your children, cross the border, weíll feed you, house you, and weíll provide you with civil rights lawyers at taxpayer expense. And you can stay indefinitely."

So theyíre coming by the thousands ó from Mexico and Central America. They are young, poor and uneducated. They will cost billions of dollars to house; to feed; to provide entitlements, healthcare and public education for; and, in many cases, in the cost of police, courts and prison. America is already bankrupt and more than $17 trillion in debt. This is the tipping point.

And itís no mistake, accident or coincidence. Obama never has to face voters again. He is out of control. He is hell-bent on the destruction of America ó and the Republican Party ó in his remaining time in office.

Yet moderate, establishment Republicans in Washington, D.C., say nothing. Cantor said nothing. This is a purposeful plan by Obama to overwhelm the system ó to flood America with poor, dependent illegal immigrants. This is how you flood the country with future Democratic voters. Keep in mind where the government is dumping them: Arizona and Texas.

This is a purposeful plan to punish GOP Governors and turn red States into blue States.

This is an invasion. This is criminal. The President refuses to secure the border. He refuses to send back criminals. He empties our prisons to purposely dump illegal immigrant felons back on the streets (36,000 last month, to be exact).

He spends your taxpayer money on lawyers for illegals. He gives them sanctuary against the laws of America. He spends your taxpayer money to run advertising campaigns in Mexico to tell illegals in America they should request food stamps.

He orders the Internal Revenue Service to target and persecute GOP donors and conservative critics, but to look the other way while the same IRS pays $4 billion per year in "earned income tax credits" to illegal immigrants who paid no taxes.

This is the final destruction of America. Still, Cantor and his clueless moderate establishment Republican leaders in D.C. said nothing and did nothing.

Now, add in our hero Marine rotting in a Mexican prison for no good reason for two months (and counting). Yet Cantor said nothing and did nothing.

So at this very moment ó with our borders under attack, with a wave of illegals invading America to overwhelm the system, with Obama emptying the prisons of foreign felons, with Mexico falsely imprisoning and torturing a hero U.S. Marine ó what do Cantor and the GOP do? They say they support immigration reform and want to rush it through Congress before the November election.

Folks, this is insanity: first, because itís time to stop rushing passage of controversial bills before anyone has read them.

Didnít we try this with Obamacare? Didnít we hear that if we liked our insurance we could keep it? Didnít we hear we could keep our doctors? Didnít we hear our health insurance premiums would go down? All lies. Complete fraud. Now, Republicans want to rush through a bill their own base does not support before reading the details? Madness.

But worse, any idiot knows that the GOP stands a great chance of winning big in November. Why would a GOP leader want to ruin that by upsetting his base? Why would you thumb your nose at your best customers? Why would you ignore what your most loyal voters are telling you? Madness.

Thereís dumb, but then thereís dumber. Cantor was both dumb and dumber. If the GOP wins big in November, it will be in a position to dictate terms of surrender to Obama over the issue of immigration reform. Right now, the GOP is at a big disadvantage. Come next January (only a few months away), the GOP will be sitting pretty. Why would anyone with a brain try to push through an immigration bill now in the waning days of a Congress where you are at a disadvantage? Madness.

No one can be this dumb or tone-deaf.

I havenít even gotten to the most important point. At this moment in time ó with Mexico laughing in our face, imprisoning and torturing our hero Marine, and with our border being overrun ó who in his right mind would even consider amnesty for millions of people already here illegally? Why would we even think of rewarding a country (Mexico) that is laughing in our face? It is sending its poor, jobless citizens to us ó so we can pay the welfare, medical, education and prison bills it should be paying. Next, like Fidel Castro, Mexico will empty its prisons to send us its worst criminals.

Mexico is a desperately poor country. They are trying to stick all their bills and responsibilities on American taxpayers.

Anyone not blind can see whatís coming. Obama has erased the border. Heís obliterated the law. Heís bankrupting the economy. In the bargain heís enriching his favorite donors: lawyers. Heís overwhelming the system with spending and debt. The plan is accelerating.

This is the invasion of America. This is the bankruptcy of our economy. This is the end of the GOP. Cantor, are you blind, deaf and dumb? GOP leaders like Cantor are either complete idiots, cowards afraid of their own shadow or traitors complicit in the destruction of America.

So wonder no more about the stunning defeat of Cantor. I say good riddance. Now, itís time to throw out the rest of the tone-deaf fools in Washington, D.C.

Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. God bless.





Americaís Enemies Are Laughing & High-Fiving As Obama Has Found Yet Another Unimaginable Way To Both Damage And†Embarrass America At The Same Time: Obama traded one obvious deserter & traitor for 5 of the most cunning, vicious mass murderers and America-haters in history
What did we get? A traitor who purposely walked away from his guard post, searching for the enemy to surrender to. And hereís the most disconcerting thing of all: At the White House ceremony announcing the trade, Bergdahlís father spoke in Arabic; it is reported his father converted to Islam. Obama broke the law to set them free, to rain hell down on our American hero soldiers and to plot a new 9/11 that could kill thousands or even hundreds of thousands of Americans (think dirty bomb). The world is shocked & horrified. Our military is demoralized. Our economy is in free fall. Our dignity & legacy are in tatters. Our reputation across the globe is shattered. Obama is destroying the once-great America!


Americaís Enemies Are Laughing & High-Fiving As Obama Has Found Yet Another Unimaginable Way To Both Damage And†Embarrass America At The Same Time: Obama traded one obvious deserter & traitor for 5 of the most cunning, vicious mass murderers and America-haters in history

Obama Makes Worst Trade Since American Indians Sold Manhattan For $24

June 6, 2014 by Wayne Allyn Root ó Personal Liberty Digest

Watch the video here ó http://personalliberty.com/obama-makes-worst-trade-since-american-indians-sold-manhattan-24/ ó or read the text of it below:

Hello, Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. President Barack Obama has done it again! Heís found an unimaginable way to both damage and embarrass America at the same time.

Remember how the American Indians gave up Manhattan? The Indians were robbed. They were conned into selling Manhattan for $24 of trinkets in 1626.

That was the worst trade in history. Until now.

Obamaís trade for Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl now tops the infamous list of "Worst Trades in History."

In the sports world there have been many legendary bad trades. Julius Irving. Kobe Bryant. Nolan Ryan. Hershel Walker to the Minnesota Vikings for an entire team of players and draft picks that led to three Super Bowl victories for the Dallas Cowboys.

But the worst sports trade ever was the Red Sox selling Babe Ruth to the Yankees. The Red Sox didnít win another title for 86 years. The Yankees became the greatest American sports franchise in history. They won seven World Championships with Babe Ruth.

It was called "The Curse of the Bambino."

Executives got fired for those horrible one-sided trades. Teams were embarrassed. Legends were created. Billions of dollars of franchise value was created (and lost). But none of those trades led to danger, disaster or the potential death of thousands of Americans.

Obama takes the cake. He traded one obvious deserter for five of the most cunning, vicious mass murderers and America-haters in history. Mass murderers and friends of Osama bin Laden were freed by America.

What did we get? A traitor who purposely walked away from his base, searching for the enemy to surrender to:

And hereís the most bizarre and disconcerting thing of all. At the White House ceremony announcing the trade, Bergdahlís father spoke in Arabic. It is reported the father converted to Islam.

Thatís what we traded five mass murderers for? Thatís what Obama broke the law for?

The trades of Manhattan and Babe Ruth are both looking pretty good by comparison.

Keep in mind those five sworn enemies of America ó mass murderers all ó havenít even gotten back on the battlefield. Yet.

But when they do, remember they were set free by our own President, to rain hell down on our American hero soldiers. Remember they were set free by our own President to plot a new 9/11 that could kill thousands or even hundreds of thousands of Americans (think dirty bomb).

The world is shocked and horrified. Americaís enemies are laughing and high-fiving. Our military is demoralized. Our economy is in free fall. Our dignity and legacy are in tatters. Our reputation across the globe is shattered. One man has destroyed the once-great America.

Why did Obama break the law to trade for one deserter? Why would he risk all hell breaking loose for one traitor who cost the lives of as many as 14 military heroes? Two reasons:

ē First, Obama was desperate to get the Veterans Affairs scandal out of the headlines. He had to change the topic away from neglect and fraud causing the death and suicide of American military vets under his leadership. How better to change the subject and erase the scandal involving abuse, neglect and even murder of military vets than by appearing to be a Commander in Chief rescuing an American military prisoner of war. Obama had delusions of grandeur, overnight going from bum to hero.

ē Second, my sources in military command positions tell me that the CIA reported to Obama that Bergdahl was about to go on global television to denounce America, call our military evil ó and do it all in Arabic. Obama would have been humiliated. His narrative of being such a big victor over al-Qaida and the Taliban would have been destroyed in front of the whole world, live on global television.

So here was the perfect way to kill two birds with one stone. But it all backfired as word got out of the betrayal by this American soldier, the deaths of 14 of his military brothers searching for him, his father speaking in Arabic, the danger that the release of those mass murderers presents, Obama claiming we will "keep eyes on them" and then, within minutes, an official in the Mideast counteracting Obamaís words and reporting these mass murderers are free as jaybirds to roam Qatar for the next year ó and then free to return to the battlefield.

Obama is either a complete fool; a reckless, naive idiot who doesnít understand who he is negotiating with; or complicit in a crime against America. You decide. But either way, he broke the law by making the deal without informing Congress.

Forget the humiliation of selling Manhattan for $24. Forget "the Curse of the Bambino." Forget all the humiliating trades in history. This one takes the cake. Babe Ruth is rolling over in his grave.

This curse wonít lose seven World Championships or three Super Bowls. This curse could cost America our international credibility and lead to more kidnappings of American soldiers and the deaths of hundreds or even thousands of deaths to Americans if these mass murderers are emboldened to create a new 9/11.

This is the "Curse of Barack Hussein Obama." America may never recover.

Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. God bless.





Obamaís Anti-America, Anti-Constitutional, Anti-Freedom, Anti-Christian, Anti-Heterosexual, Anti-White Agenda Is Inciting A Revolution
A conflict is coming into play from 2 masses: the liberal lobby for Obama ó with his pro-gay, pro-black, pro-socialist agenda, executed by his secret National Security Agency drone army ó and freedom-loving, gun-owning Americans who are willing to fight and, if necessary, die for the Constitution. These are the masses headed to battle, to civil war. And I expect it will happen 2 years after the 2016 Presidential election; for the first time in my life I fear blood in the streets. Opposing a panicked crowd is like opposing a cattle stampede. If you stand in its path, you will surely be trampled to death. The problem with crowds is they have no ear for reason. Once a contagious fear grabs hold, a crowd loses all sense of objectivity & all reason. Truth is meaningless. There is no way that you are going to reverse it until the hysteria has run its course.


Obamaís Anti-America, Anti-Constitutional, Anti-Freedom, Anti-Christian, Anti-Heterosexual, Anti-White Agenda Is Inciting A Revolution

Are Americans Ready For A Revolution?

May 28, 2014 by John Meyers ó Personal Liberty Digest

"While all our ancient beliefs are tottering and disappearing, while the old pillars of society are giving way one by one, the power of the crowd is the only force that nothing menaces, and of which the prestige is continually on the increase." ó From Gustave Le Bonís 1895 book, The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind

Imagine sitting in a theater watching a movie. Behind you someone jumps to his feet and shouts, "Fire!"

You canít smell a whiff of smoke, nor can you spot a single spark. The smoke detectors are silent; the automatic sprinklers motionless. Yet none of this matters. Within seconds, The Crowd has been created. People everywhere are screaming out. A mass of people begins to make its way to the fire escape. Assume you know for certain that there is no fire. You face a choice: either plant yourself in the center aisle and oppose The Crowd, or throw yourself into the throng.

If you are a principled man or woman, you might think itís your duty to oppose The Crowd. Guess what? Fulfilling that duty will be the last thing you ever do. A panicked crowd is not going to listen to what you have to say no matter how well reasoned it is argued. Opposing it is like opposing a cattle stampede. If you stand in its path, you will surely be trampled to death.

The problem with crowds is they have no ear for reason. Once a contagious fear grabs hold, a crowd loses all sense of objectivity and all reason. Truth is meaningless.

There is no way on Earth that you are going to reverse it until the hysteria has run its course.

Crowd Control

The longevity of a government is often dependent on its ability to control and, in some cases, incite a crowd.

Napoleon understood this as well as any leader and used his influence to revitalize France after it had torn itself to shreds during its bloody revolution. The powers that had preceded him ó most notably the Jacobins ó were able to incite the masses, but thereafter could not control them. A testament to this was the summary execution of Robespierre with the guillotine, the instrument he used so effectively during the Reign of Terror, a 13-month period that claimed the lives of 20,000 Frenchmen.

Crowds are not only pervasive in politics, but are also indigenous to investment markets. As a result, conscientious investors must always be wary of crowds. If one starts to form, markets take on a life of their own, quite apart from reason or reality.

One of the earliest examples of a market gone awry after being besieged by a crowd is the case of the South Sea Bubble.

According to Wikipedia, the South Sea Company "was a British joint-stock company founded in 1711, created as a publicĖprivate partnership to consolidate and reduce the cost of national debt." The real objective of the company and its creator, John Blunt, was to bilk the investment public. After British Parliament legalized the sale of stock in 1711, the South Sea Company issued debentures worth 100 pounds a share. Immediately, the stock rose; but not because of any ventures undertaken by the company.

None of the company directors ever traveled to the South Seas; and none of them took seriously any trade with South America, still a protectorate of Spain, which was unwilling to share any of its spoils. For a decade, this inconvenient fact did not matter. Yet Blunt was able to entice the cream of English society into its venture. Royalty, noblemen and even members of Parliament bought into the South Sea promise.

As this new money washed in, it was used to pay off the few that sold out. By 1718, the South Sea Company attracted a much wider audience. Everyone from cobblers to milkmaids learned of this great new venture that promised profit without work.

Propelled by the capital of the masses, the South Sea speculation took off. The price of a single share began to skyrocket: first to 500 pounds, then to 700 pounds and finally to more than 900 pounds. Then in the summer of 1720, the roof craved in. The plague arrived in England, and a sense of foreboding was everywhere. Money became tight, and investors began to sell out.

But when several of them moved to sell, the company was unable to pay off. The South Sea Bubble burst.

Huge fortunes were wiped out, and thousands of speculators were left penniless. By October 1720, the nation was embroiled in a full-scale financial crisis. Bankruptcies swelled, the real estate market collapsed and, in the end, the government itself fell. England was shaken to its core.

Part and parcel of the South Sea Bubble, and typical of all speculative bubbles over the past 300 years, was the participation of The Crowd. Typical to the late stages of a bull market is swelling public interest. This often creates a crowd.

Cautiously at first, and then later with reckless abandon, The Crowd becomes overwrought with greed, propelling it into a feeding frenzy. Thereafter, markets reach unsupportable heights that can no longer be levitated because the universe of new buyers has run dry. The markets collapse underneath their own weight; and another crowd, rank with fear, rushes for the exits. The bullish excesses on the run-up are now exceeded by the bearish impulses of the downside.

This pattern of surge and crash has occurred repeatedly since the South Sea Bubble. To dismiss it now would be like dismissing the ebb and flow of the tides of human behavior.

Nothing Civil About Civil War

For decades, my focus with the masses was which way they would take the markets. The stock market crashes of 1987 and 2008 showed me that is not going to be the total crisis of confidence if markets face big downward swings only to be puffed backed up by imaginary money created by Congress and the Federal Reserve and that real crisis is going to be when the Federal government steps forward and institutes draconian laws upon all Americans.

What the Federal government doesnít yet realize is the conflict coming into play from two masses: the liberal lobby for President Barack Obama ó with his pro-gay, pro-black, pro-socialist agenda, executed by his secret National Security Agency drone army ó and freedom-loving, gun-owning Americans who are willing to fight and, if necessary, die for the Constitution. These are the masses headed to battle, to civil war. And I expect it will happen two years after the 2016 Presidential election. For the first time in my life, I fear blood in the streets.

Yours in good times and bad times,

ĖJohn Myers





Black And Gay Sycophants Are Deconstructing America: And Youíre Being Indoctrinated To Applaud The Wreckage!
Three Things I Hate Most About Liberals: Liberals seem to see only one side of the coin ó their side, which is: Pro-Homosexual: I want to vomit every time I hear proud to be gay; when did anyone ever say be proud to be straight? And the more demonstrative gays are (ever notice the overt touching & kissing), the more gay pride they have. Pro-Black: If anyone (especially a straight, white man) ever says anything close to a racist comment, liberals want to hang him in the court of public opinion ó so much so that white people are afraid of what they say, while black people can spout off as much as they want. Pro-Islam: This is the most dangerous one because it could tie America into a Hundred Years War. And with liberal leaders like Obama, Islam may win it in 20. Muslims are already the fastest-growing segment of the worldís population & extremism is worse today than it was on 9/11.


Black And Gay Sycophants Are Deconstructing America: And Youíre Being Indoctrinated To Applaud The Wreckage!

Black And Gay Sycophants Are Deconstructing America

May 21, 2014 by John Meyers ó Personal Liberty Digest 

"We donít need no education. 
We donít need no thought control. No dark sarcasm in the classroom
. Teacher, leave them kids alone"
Ė Pink Floyd, "Another Brick In The Wall"

Liberals are having a difficult time defending Islam. And so they should after a death sentence was imposed on a Christian woman in Sudan for the high crime of not denouncing her personal savior, Jesus Christ.

Meanwhile, the pro-black and pro-homosexual media, such as CNN, focused almost exclusively on NFL wannabe Michael Sam and on the racist of the century, NBA Clippers owner Donald Sterling. There was only a passing mention that a Sudanese court had sentenced a pregnant woman to death.

Meriam Yehya Ibrahim, 27, was convicted of apostasy (the renunciation of Islam) by a Khartoum court, even though she was born and raised a Christian and married a Christian. The court also convicted her of adultery and sentenced her to 100 lashes because her marriage to a Christian man is considered void under Sharia law.

Two thousand years after killing Christians, all that is missing in some Muslim countries are the Romans and the lions. I would tell my liberal friends this, but I no longer have any. I canít stand their hypocrisy over their pro-rights stance for women along with their defense of Islam, which at its very core robs women of any rights.

And while there is some outrage in America about Ibrahim, so far we havenít heard a word from President Barack Obama. Obama has plenty of time on his hands when it comes to congratulating NFLer (soon to be ex-NFLer because he is too short and too slow) Sam, who made a spectacle of himself when he was drafted almost dead last by kissing, crying and shoving cake down his male loverís throat, or when it comes to commenting on a religion near and dear to his heart, Islam. Yet once again, Islam has been revealed for what it is, a werewolf in shepherdís clothing.

Americans should be shaken that Obama dedicated the National September 11 Memorial Museum in New York last Thursday without one mention of Islam, Muslims or al-Qaida. According to Obama, it is a memorial whose cause was plain-vanilla terrorism, the kind that might spring up in Oklahoma City by homegrown terrorists or in New York City by terrorists from out of the country. Iíve been to the Pearl Harbor Memorial, and I definitely remember the tour guide saying "Japan" and "Japanese" during the tour. But Obama wonít ever make a mention of Islam. He is perhaps too worried about prejudice against his religion or perhaps his Islamic agenda.

Muslims And Their Liberal Supporters Are No Laughing Matter

I suspect Bill Maher is not liked by many of you, but on a typical Friday evening I watch his HBO comedy show so I can see the liberal take on things (best to know oneís opposition) and appreciate his sometimes libertarian views that must make his liberal fans physically sick. Such was the case two weeks ago when Maher and guest Arianna Huffington, the syndicated columnist, got into brouhaha over Islam and its malevolent goals.

Maher was talking to his three panelists about the recent kidnappings of hundreds of Nigerian girls and how little mention there is of the fact that the kidnappers are Islamists. "That (is) the religion at large, (where) women are seen as property, second-class at best, often property," said Maher.

Huffington argued that it is "dangerous for people to stereotype all Muslims as terrorists."

Maher answered back: "Where it becomes dangerous is that liberals like yourself do not stand up for liberalism. Liberalism means, one, mostly, equality of women."

If Maher keeps up this kind of talk, he will be the next Sterling, who is being stripped of his NBA team for sharing his thoughts in what he believed was a private and intimate moment with a parasitic woman who wanted to tape and extort him. Maher doesnít like Islam, which is mostly black or brown peoples. This must be intolerable to liberals, and even he could be persecuted for sharing his thoughts. But I have a news flash: Millions of minorities donít like white people either. And I, for one, am not saying they should have to. If you want to hate me, fine. I wonít agree, but I will defend your right with my life to say bad things.

And would someone please stick a secret microphone next to Spike Lee so we can hear what his private conversations are about white people? But do you really think such a recording would ever see the light of day? And if it did, do you think Hollywood would boycott his movies and actors and that set people would refuse to work for him? Do you believe that if he were exposed at his worst, Lee would or even should be washed up? I donít. I like some of his movies. And even if I didnít, he should have the right to make them if people are willing to pay to see them. If people donít like Lee, they shouldnít pay to see his movies. Regardless, Lee should have his right to privacy. This means that inside his home he should be able to share his worst thoughts on any subject with anyone and not be recorded and then publicly crucified by the media.

Not so, says Kathleen Parker, who makes a living out of writing her opinions for The Washington Post. On April 29 Parker wrote that Sterling had no right to privacy even in his own home:

First the practical: If you donít want your words broadcast in the public square, donít say them. The Orwellian taint to this advice is not meant to be harsh but is offered in recognition of the world in which we live. Weíre not so much a global village as a small town of gossips.

On a higher note, such potential exposure forces us to more carefully select our words and edit our thoughts. This isnít only a matter of survival but is essential to civilization. Speaking oneís mind isnít really all itís cracked up to be, as any well-balanced person reading the comments section quickly concludes.

Let me get this straight, Kathy. Nobody can speak his mind, especially your readers, and thatís a good thing? So while you get paid big bucks to speak your mind, everyone else should just shut the hell up!

Here is what I want to know: What have you, Ms. Parker, said at your worst private moments when you were tired, drunk or just stupid? Have you never, ever once said the "N" word (isnít it silly or is it just cowardice on my part that I am intimidated and donít feel I can actually write that word even though it is on rap radio ad nauseam?)? Or have you never said a derogatory sentence about homosexuals, Mexicans, Republicans, Canadians or the favorite target of the media to which you belong, white, heterosexual men? To prove it, can we implant your body with a recording device. And if you ever once utter such things you consider private, we "judges of society" can have you stripped of your career and property, as is the case with Sterling.

Three Things I Hate Most About Liberals

Liberals seem to see only one side of the coin ó their side, which is:

ē Pro-homosexual: I want to vomit every time I hear proud to be gay; when did anyone ever say be proud to be straight? And the more demonstrative gays are (ever notice the overt touching and kissing), the more gay pride they have.

ē Pro-black: If anyone (especially a straight, white man) ever says anything close to a racist comment, liberals want to hang him in the court of public opinion ó so much so that white people are afraid of what they say, while black people can spout off as much as they want.

ē Pro-Islam: This is the most dangerous one because it could tie America into a Hundred Years War. And with liberal leaders like Obama, Islam may win it in 20. Muslims are already the fastest-growing segment of the worldís population. And extremism is worse today, according to polls, than it was on 9/11.

All of the above are eating away American values that made this country great. Sorry if liberals think the late 1950s were a terrible period, but I happen to be nostalgic ó especially when my feelings are consistent with many positive truths.

Yet Lee told CNN last week that America is never going back to the days of Ozzie and Harriet. I see nothing wrong with the days of Ozzie and Harriet, President Dwight Eisenhower and a dynamo economy. The 1950s were a time when private speech really was private and you could have an opinion and make it public. But that America is being dismantled. And every time the extremists win, the liberals rip away one more brick in our wall.

Yours in good times and bad,

ĖJohn Myers





Do You Understand What Obama Has Done To America's Healthcare System? Forget the threat of losing your insurance, or your doctor, or your medicine. The real threat with government in charge is losing your life; government's incompetence or criminal behavior will kill you!
The national scandal & disgrace at the VA (Veterans Affairs) proves what a disaster Obamacare will be. The VA scandal is proof positive that with government in charge of healthcare, it will bankrupt the entire country & countless Americans will die through incompetence, neglect, waiting lists and fraud. Just like our veterans have already experienced; there was outright criminal negligence as government employees kept secret waiting lists to cover up the long delays for patients that had life threatening illnesses. Government screws up everything it touches, while losing billions of dollars of other people's money. Putting government in charge of healthcare for 317 million Americans will definitely up the death toll!


Do You Understand What Obama Has Done To America's Healthcare System? Forget the threat of losing your insurance, or your doctor, or your medicine. The real threat with government in charge is losing your life; government's incompetence or criminal behavior will kill you!

Bad News On Memorial Day: We Are All Veterans Now

May 23, 2014 by Wayne Allyn Root -- Personal Liberty Digest

 

Watch the video here:  http://personalliberty.com/bad-news-memorial-day-veterans -now/ or read the text of it below

Hi, I'm Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. It's Memorial Day weekend and the national scandal and disgrace at the VA (Veterans Affairs) is the perfect example proving once and for all what a disaster Obamacare will be. We're about to find out what it's like to receive healthcare from the government. With Obamacare as the law of the land, we are all veterans now.

The VA scandal is proof positive that with government in charge of healthcare, it will bankrupt the entire country and countless Americans will die through incompetence, neglect, waiting lists and fraud. Just like our veterans have already experienced.

But this VA scandal is nothing new. Conservatives have warned about the dangers of government-run healthcare for many years, often using the VA as Exhibit A. My national bestselling book "The Ultimate Obama Survival Guide" was released in April 2013. Almost everything hitting the news about the VA today was already known way back then. Let me quote from my book:

Take the Veterans Administration. A federal appeals court has ruled the VA suffers from "unchecked incompetence." That incompetence is killing our brave veterans. I bet you didn°Įt know 18 veterans commit suicide per day. Or that 85,000 vets are on waiting lists for care. Even a severely depressed vet can wait eight weeks to see a psychiatrist. Still want government to run your healthcare?

That's direct from my book ®C written 18 months ago. So who couldn't see this disaster coming? Government mismanagement. Substandard healthcare. Vets being treated horribly. Vets dying while waiting on long waiting lists. Vets committing suicide. We knew it years ago. This isn't new news.

About the only thing we didn't know back then was that there was outright criminal negligence that could lead to murder charges. We didn't know government employees kept secret waiting lists to cover up the long delays -- even though they knew patients had life threatening illnesses. That sounds like murder to me.

What a surprise! Conservatives like Sarah Palin and I screamed about "death panels" and "death by rationing" years ago. I predicted in the media long before today's VA scandal that sick Americans would be committing suicide after dealing with government bureaucrats. I warned grandma might die if the same government that runs the Postal Service and the VA was put in charge of grandma's cancer surgery.

We told you so -- a long time ago. Government is a walking disaster. Government screws up everything it touches, while losing billions of dollars of other people's money. How could putting government in charge of healthcare for 317 million Americans possibly work out?

Long before this new scandal, many of us pointed to the U.S. Postal Service. By law, there can be no competition, yet our Postal Service still manages to lose about $16 billion every year. No private sector company in history has ever managed a feat like this.

Or look at Amtrak. The government took over about 40 years ago and has lost about $40 billion since then. To this day, the taxpayers lose $32 every time a butt sits in an Amtrak seat.

All the wars in America's history have cost about $7 trillion. Yet the war on poverty has cost $20 trillion and counting (adjusted for inflation). And poverty is still at all-time highs. What a massive failure and waste of taxpayer money.

The Federal Reserve has one main job: to protect the value of our dollar. Yet the dollar has lost 98 percent of its value since the Fed was founded.

The government couldn't even run a whorehouse and make a profit! In my home state of Nevada (where prostitution is legal in some rural counties), the government took over a $100 million brothel and in one year drove it into bankruptcy. How can anyone lose money on sex? I told crowds at Tea Party rallies across the country, "If you can't run a whorehouse and make a profit, get your damn hands off my healthcare!"

In case you think that's an anomaly, look no further than Off Track Betting in New York. Yes, horse track gambling run by government also went bankrupt -- even though the government skims their take off the top, before the bettors are paid. It's impossible to go bankrupt with that scenario. Government found a way!

The same government that brought you failing gambling operations, failing brothels, failing post offices, failing trains and pretty much failing everything else is now in charge of your healthcare (as well as 17 percent of the U.S. economy).

The same government employees that brought us $17 trillion in national debt are in charge of healthcare, yet Obama promised Obamacare would save money and reduce the deficit. He also promised you could keep your health insurance if you liked it. And you could keep your doctor. And your insurance premiums would not go up.

Do you now understand what Obama has done to America's healthcare system? Forget the threat of losing your insurance, or your doctor, or your medicine. The real threat with government in charge is losing your life! Either government's incompetence or criminal behavior will kill you or, after dealing with the idiots that run the government, you'll just kill yourself.

Happy Memorial Day. We're all veterans now. I'm Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. Happy holiday to all our veterans. God bless you. And God bless America.





Glorifying Perversion: It is now established orthodoxy in the USA that not only must the homosexual lifestyle be accepted by all without question, but it must be glorified by all as well
Unleash the hounds with charges of homophobia. I do not care. Nor do I care when I meet someone whether he is homosexual or heterosexual. I never inquire, nor do I expect it to be announced, much less thrown in my face. It is long-established religious orthodoxy that sexual immorality ó including homosexuality ó is a sin. That is Godís word, not mine. Donít blame me. Christianity is my lifestyle. I have no desire to preach that truth to you if you donít want to hear it. Why must you insist on preaching to me that I should embrace your lifestyle? I will not, for I cannot (Romans 1:18-32). We are no longer slouching toward Gomorrah. We have long since arrived. Going contrary to established orthodoxy has become dangerous. Contrary viewpoints are no longer tolerated in America. That is fascist & oppressive


Glorifying Perversion: It is now established orthodoxy in the USA that not only must the homosexual lifestyle be accepted by all without question, but it must be glorified by all as well

Glorifying Perversion

May 14, 2014 by Bob Livingston ó Personal Liberty Digest

Former University of Missouri football player Michael Sam was selected by St. Louis in the seventh round of the 2014 NFL Draft. When he found out, he kissed his boyfriend for all the world to see.

It is now established orthodoxy that not only must the homosexual lifestyle be "accepted" by all without question, but it must be glorified by all as well.

The sports and entertainment media jumped the shark with Michael Samís celebrated kiss televised for all to see after learning he was drafted by an NFL team. But the kiss was not a one-off event, as it began to be replayed ad nauseam on sports media, particularly ESPN.

Sam was lauded for his courage in "coming out." But what courage is involved in riding the wave of popular culture? When he announced he was gay, he was invited to the White House by President Barack Obama.

Sam had the example of NBA player Jason Collins, who was featured on the cover of Time in its April 2014 issue of the "100 Most Influential People of the World," after he announced he was homosexual, becoming the celebrated "first ever openly gay player in a major U.S professional league."

There is no courage in glorifying perversion, nor in riding the wave of popular culture. The courage is in opposing it, which can cause you to be sent to a re-education camp (NFL player Don Jones) or cost you your livelihood (Brendan Eich, David and Jason Benham and almost Phil Robinson).

In case you havenít heard, the Benhams had a show canceled that was scheduled to begin on HGTV. That announcement coincided with an announcement by NBC that it was to begin production of a lesbian sitcom produced by Ellen DeGeneres. The establishment culture has been inoculating us to this end for some time with shows featuring homosexual characters.

Michael Sam and Jason Collins are not Jackie Robinson. Robinsonís effort took courage. Samís and Collinsí not so much.

Unleash the hounds with charges of homophobia. I do not care. Nor do I care when I meet someone whether he is homosexual or heterosexual. I never inquire, nor do I expect it to be announced, much less thrown in my face.

It is long-established religious orthodoxy that sexual immorality ó including homosexuality ó is a sin. That is Godís word, not mine. Donít blame me.

Christianity is my lifestyle. I have no desire to preach that truth to you if you donít want to hear it. Why must you insist on preaching to me that I should embrace your lifestyle? I will not, for I cannot (Romans 1:18-32).

We are no longer slouching toward Gomorrah. We have long since arrived.

Going contrary to established orthodoxy has become dangerous. Contrary viewpoints are no longer tolerated in America. That is fascist and totalitarian.





The Real Weapon Of Mass Destruction: Climate Change Or Barack Obama? Obama is by far a more dangerous weapon of mass destruction!!
Obama seems only to detest North American hydrocarbons ó a proven and affordable energy that provides national security for the USA. He seems perfectly at ease with Saudi Arabian oil; you might think that Obama is an Islamist whose is at odds with a free America and the Constitution. Obamaís goal is to tax and eventually control the fossil fuel industry in North America. He wants oversight of domestic oil exploration (which creates jobs), of the Keystone pipeline (which creates jobs), and of the expansion of Americaís vast and clean natural gas reserves (which creates jobs). Meanwhile, he supports expensive and unproven Green technologies that leave the USA in greater debt and with a weakened economy & further suppressive government regulations. Is Obama deliberately undermining the United States and our energy independence?


The Real Weapon Of Mass Destruction: Climate Change Or Barack Obama? Obama is by far a more dangerous weapon of mass destruction!!

The Real Weapon Of Mass Destruction: ĎClimate Changeí Or Barack Obama?

May 14, 2014 by John Meyers ó Personal Liberty Digest 

Last week, the White House had a publicity blitz that reminded me of a preview of a 1960s horror movie. This is not the exact wording of it, but it is the gist:

"The Climate Blob," more hideous than zombies, more destructive than an alien invasion and dealing out death like a killer asteroid. Produced by Barack H. Obama, "The Climate Blob" stars John Kerry as Agent Orange and Nancy Pelosi as The Blob.

What happened instead was the world was told of an imminent threat in a newly released study by 300 scientists. Working for the Obama Administration on a project called the National Climate Assessment, the scientists warned immediate action has to be taken by governments acting in concert (sounds like global government) to prevent a global catastrophe. Hereís a propaganda film the White House released:

"Climate change, once considered an issue for a distant future, has moved firmly into the present," the 840-page report concluded.

The report stated that corn producers in Iowa, oyster growers in Washington State and maple syrup producers in Vermont are all observing climate-related changes that are "outside of recent experience." Left out was whether dogs and cats are living together in California, but you get the drift; without the help of Obama and other Democrats, planet Earth faces an environmental Armageddon.

The National Climate Assessment supports the warning given by Kerry in February in Jakarta, Indonesia, where our Secretary of State told members of that government (perhaps in some ways already all members of the same global government): "Itís not an exaggeration to say that your entire way of life here is at risk."

Kerry went on to say: "In a sense, climate change can now be considered the worldís largest weapon of mass destruction, perhaps even, the worldís most fearsome weapon of mass destruction." Yes, Kerry, a former foot soldier and still a liberal activist, is now a scientist and soothsayer.

I remember the Kerry who gave testimony on Capitol Hill in his infantry greens, not the one speaking to foreign governments for the Greens. Of course, that Kerry was around in the 1970s, the decade when scientists were certain that the world was headed for another ice age.

It seems that keeping up with what is going to happen to the planet is much like knowing if milk is good or bad for you. Both are variable. But climate change involves a lot more scientists, a lot more money and a far bigger agenda for those that embrace the idea of a global government ó something that is becoming more of a reality when the citizens of the world recognize that only a single world order can truly establish the necessary laws to save humanity. Mao Zedong would have loved it.

More worrisome is our politicians ó especially Obama ó who embrace the necessity for "unilateral action," which are code words for global government.

The White House website has its own version of the facts. Under "Energy, Climate Change and our Environment" a statement reads: "The President has taken unprecedented action to build the foundation for a clean energy economy, tackle the issue of climate change, and protect our environment."

The website quotes the President: "We canít have an energy strategy for the last century that traps us in the past. We need an energy strategy for the future ó an all-of-the-above strategy for the 21st century that develops every source of American-made energy."

The President is willing to put our money where his mouth is. In fact, as Kerry was warning of world climate change this past winter, the U.S. Department of Agriculture created what it calls "climate hubs." Washington utopians who have planned it say it is for farmers, universities, industry and, of course, government, to better prepare for climate disasters like floods and droughts that have existed only recently.

And itís not just idle talk. The White Houseís plan is to use the National Climate Assessment report to strengthen Obamaís "Climate Action Plan," which will be stocked with $1 billion in taxpayer money for something called the "climate resiliency fund."

Such names are pure Orwellian doublespeak, and that suits Obama because of his goal to tax and eventually control the fossil fuel industry in North America. He wants oversight of domestic oil exploration (which creates jobs), of the Keystone pipeline (which creates jobs), and of the expansion of Americaís vast and clean natural gas reserves (which creates jobs). Meanwhile, he supports expensive and unproven Green technologies that leave the United States in greater debt and with a weakened economy and further government regulations.

Obama seems only to detest North American hydrocarbons ó a proven and affordable energy that provides national security for the United States. He seems perfectly at ease with Saudi Arabian oil, which explains why he is always eager to make state visits that show his support for the Muslim kingdom that has massive annual oil production and the largest oil reserves in the world. If you didnít know better, you might think that Obama is the Mecca candidate ó an Islamist whose energy policies, economic programs and globalist views are at odds with a free America and the Constitution.

On June 25, Obama said: "[W]hile we may not live to see the full realization of our ambition, we will have the satisfaction of knowing that the world we leave to our children will be better off for what we did."

What exactly is the Presidentís ambition and how does he intend to achieve it? Is it possible Obama is undermining the United States and our energy independence for sinister global ambition? If that is so, it makes Obama a far more dangerous weapon of mass destruction than changes in the weather.

Yours in good times and bad,

ĖJohn Myers





The Obama Regimeís Recovery Con: Can there be any doubt the U.S. is a collapsing fascist [radical authoritarian suppressionist] state as Obama demands "more of yours while you go poor"!!
The Obama message is really quite simple: His Administration will be held accountable for no failure and will answer to no criticism, evidence notwithstanding. And, the government vows consequences for any American who dares challenge its corruption by exercising the very rights put in place to keep the tyranny at bay. In 16 million U.S. homes, not one person is working and there is no income beyond a government check; thatís 20% of all households that are being supported off the backs of a declining number of American workers. Thanks to Obamacare on 1-1-14 the top marginal tax rate went from 35% to 39.6%, the top income payroll tax jumped from 37.4% to 52.2%, capital gains taxes went from 15% to 28%, taxes on dividends leapt from 15% to 39.6%, and estate taxes jumped from zero to 55%.


The Obama Regimeís Recovery Con: Can there be any doubt the U.S. is a collapsing fascist [radical authoritarian suppressionist] state as Obama demands "more of yours while you go poor"!!

The Regimeís Recovery Con

May 5, 2014 by Bob Livingston ó Personal Liberty Digest

Ah, the happy glow of phony numbers and a compliant mainstream media.

Following the release of Fridayís jobs report, Bloombergís headline simply beamed "Hiring in U.S. Kicks Into Higher Gear as Unemployment Plunges." All is now rosy in the Obama recovery.

"Stocks rose on the improving jobs picture and Treasury yields climbed," Bloomberg proclaimed. Sorry to bear the news, but itís all as farcical as the phony money the Federal Reserve is pumping out.

Bloomberg highlighted a 288,000 gain in employment. But you have to read way down to see that the labor force shrank by more than 800,000 in April. Funny math Bloomberg is using. 288,000 minus 800,000 equals negative 512,000. Only in the sociopathic world of government doublespeak does such a huge negative equal a positive.

Thatís a far cry from a gain in employment, and itís reflected in the labor force participation rate, which dropped to 62.8 percent. Labor force participation is the share of working-age people in the labor force. It hasnít been this low since 1978. That means that 92,594,000 "workers" are not workers. Thatís an all-time record. What April really saw was 988,000 drop out of the labor force, the second highest total ever.

President Barack Obama and his minions proclaimed recovery summer in 2010. At the time, the labor force participation rate was 65.2 percent.

Blessed recovery. Just imagine if things werenít going well where weíd be.

Looking deeper in the numbers (thanks to Zerohedge.com for doing the dirty work) we see what a con job the regime is doing with the statistics. The Bureau of Labor Statisticsí Household survey showed an actual decline of 73,000 jobs. All this while the number of people who currently wanted a job remained unchanged at 6,146,000.

And hereís some more depressing news about Americaís depression: The average number of jobs added per month since the peak of the depression (February 2010) is 172,000. But the average number of people who have dropped out of the labor force each month since that time is 175,000.

And whatís more, the "recovery" is not translating into more jobs for workers under age 55. Workers aged 16-54 Ė note this includes the most productive sector, those aged 25-54 Ė lost 259,000 jobs in April. Only those aged 55 and above showed a net gain, according to the BLS.

For women, things are even worse. The Obama regimeís war on women workers has driven the number of females 16 and older not in the workforce up to a record 55,116,000. Thatís an increase of 428,000 over March.

Workers 55-69 gained 174,000, likely indicating two things: older workers are unable to retire because theyíve spent their life savings (what hasnít been lost to inflation) just surviving the depression, and theyíre now forced to work to support their grown children who canít find work.

In 16 million out of a total of 80 million U.S. homes, not one person is working and there is no income beyond a government check. Thatís 20 percent of all households that are being supported off the backs of a declining number of American workers.

But never mind though, Obamaphiles ensure us that all those jobs lost at the opening of the "George Bush recession" have been recovered.

On Obamacare

Obamaís White House told us, "you can keep your health plan if you like your health plan." Further affronting fact, theyíve claimed that Obamacare is not forcing you to pay for other peopleís abortions. The law, they continue to insist, is working perfectly for all Americans.

Of course, Jay Carney pointed out last week that  the Administration doesnít have any real Obamacare numbers; but any numbers that donít put a positive spin on the healthcare law are wrong.

One in three ACA enrollees had not paid their premium by April 15. But Obama continues to claim the debate on Obamacare is over and the law is working.

If by "working" he means itís destroying the health insurance industry, doctor-patient relationships and middle class job opportunities, I guess heís right.

Thanks to Obamacare, on Jan. 1 the top marginal tax rate went from 35 percent to 39.6 percent. The top income payroll tax jumped from 37.4 percent to 52.2 percent. Capital gains taxes Ė which is money already taxed once Ė went from 15 percent to 28 percent, taxes on dividends leapt from 15 percent to a whopping 39.6 percent, and estate taxes jumped from zero to 55 percent. And Obama wants more.

On the Bundy Ranch

Iíve documented for you Senator Harry Reidís criminality. Here are couple more tidbits that have come to light.

Reidís interest in Bundyís land goes beyond transnational green energy boondoggles and the Dry Lake Solar Energy Zone. It seems that Reid is in possession of 93 acres of land near the Bundy Ranch that sit on the path of a future development and a freeway interchange.

Also, the BLM may have violated posse comitatus in its standoff with Bundy and his supporters. The website Uncle Samís Misguided Children, a site run by Marine veterans with ties to the intelligence community, spotted at least one U.S. Army Special Forces member among the government-backed thugs threatening Bundy and his supporters.

Remember that Reid said in reference to the Bundy standoff: Itís not over. Las Vegas police officers claim theyíre doing all they can to identify any of the militia in the crowd that may have pointed a gun at law enforcement.

Demonstrating the double standard that is a police state; LEOs are free to aim guns at civilians without consequence but go all apoplectic when guns are pointed back by free Americans.

The reality you wonít hear from Obamaís media lapdogs

The whole U.S. economy is a stack of cards hanging on lies and money printing. The stock market is an expanding bubble of insolvency. There is still time Ė though the window is closing ó thanks to the manipulators to buy silver. Itís still under $20 an ounce. Thatís a bargain. You need it in your possession. Now!

The President can only tout his failing healthcare overhaul as a success by pretending that evidence to the contrary is invalid.

"We dispute their numbers. We donít have hard, concrete numbers, but we dispute them," Carney said last week.

Besides, Obama likes to say, the Affordable Care Act is the law of the land, so get over it. (Last time I checked, the 2nd Amendment is another, much older, law of the land.)

Meanwhile, The Administration is using the same strategy to deflect an even more transparent failure on the part of his Administration: the terror attacks that led to the loss of American life in Benghazi, Libya.

Last week, former White House National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor responded to Fox Newsí questions about newly publicized White House documents that prove a coverup took place, saying, "Dude, this was like two years ago."

Based on statements by these spokespuppets, the Obama message is really quite simple: This Administration will be held accountable for no failure and will answer to no criticism, evidence notwithstanding. And as weíve witnessed with the events that unfolded at Bundy Ranch, the government vows consequences for any American who dares challenge its corruption by exercising the very rights put in place to keep the tyranny at bay.

Can there be any doubt the U.S. is a collapsing fascist state?





Obama Is Quite Simply A Jinx, Bad News, A Storm Cloud From Hell, And A Walking Disaster. Obama destroys whatever he touches ó except for the two evil empires of China and Russia
Under Obama: The American middle class is no longer #1 in the world; American businesses are being destroyed faster than they are being created; there are now more food-stamp recipients than the number of women working full-time in America; the average full-time male employee now earns less than 40 years ago; there are now 70% more Americans collecting entitlement checks than working in the private sector; the number of working-age Americans†not†in the labor force is at all-time highs; the workplace participation rate of men is the lowest in history; the workforce participation rate of women is the lowest on record; the workforce participation rate for black Americans is the lowest in history; and 800,000 people dropped out of the workforce in just the last month.


Obama Is Quite Simply A Jinx, Bad News, A Storm Cloud From Hell, And A Walking Disaster. Obama destroys whatever he touches ó except for the two evil empires of China and Russia.

Is Obama A Jinx Upon America?

May 9, 2014 by Wayne Allyn Root ó Personal Liberty Digest  

Watch the video here ó http://personalliberty.com/obama-jinx-upon-america/ ó or read the text of it below

Have you heard? China is set to pass America as the worldís No. 1 economy ó this year.

For many years now, weíve been told this day of reckoning was years, if not decades, away. We always knew it would come someday. But under the leadership and economic policies of President Barack Obama, itís suddenly jumped way ahead of all previous projections.

What an embarrassment. The United States has had the unchallenged No. 1 economy in world since 1872 (when we passed the United Kingdom). Since 1872. Eighteen hundred and seventy-two. Let that sink in for a while.

One hundred and forty-two years of world dominance erased in only six years under one manís leadership.

But wait. As an infomercial pitchman might say, "Thereís much more."

The same thing happening to the economy is happening to the American quality of life. Under Obama, for the first time in history our middle class isnít No. 1 in the world. Canadaís middle class is now No. 1. And the entire rest of the world is catching up fast. Soon weíll be No. 10, then No. 20. How low can we go?

The same thing is happening to entrepreneurs and small business. For the first time in history, businesses in America are being destroyed faster than they are starting. Amazing.

Under Obama, there are now more food-stamp recipients than the number of women working full-time in America.

Under Obama, the average full-time male employee now earns less (adjusted for inflation) than 40 years ago.

Under Obama, there are now 70 percent more Americans collecting entitlement checks than working in the private sector (148 million "takers" versus 86 million "makers"). This isnít a conservative opinion. Itís a fact provided by the U.S. Census Bureau.

Under Obama, the number of working-age Americans not in the labor force is at all-time highs.

Under Obama, the workplace participation rate of men is the lowest in history.

Under Obama, the workforce participation rate of women is the lowest on record.

Under Obama, the workforce participation rate for black Americans is the lowest in history.

More than 800,000 people dropped out of the workforce last month. Thatís almost 1 million Americans who have given upÖ in a month.

Because millions of the unemployed have given up looking for work, the unemployment rate has dropped to 6.3 percent. Obama calls that good news. Heck, at this rate the whole nation might give up looking for a job by the time Obama leaves office; and heíll report we have reached full employment.

One man Ė Obama ó has done that much damage. So forget the debate over whether Obama is a radical Marxist intent on the destruction of capitalism and America or whether heís an inexperienced, incompetent, economically ignorant megalomaniac.

Does it really matter?

Obama is like the old joke about a dying man lying in the hospital with his wife of 50 years:

Murray is lying on his death bed in a hospital room. His wife Ida sits by his side.

Murray says, "Ida, youíve always been by my side.

"You were there when I flunked out of college.

"You were there when I was fired from my first job.

"You were there when I opened a business and it failed.

"You were there when I filed for bankruptcy.

"You were there when I was paralyzed in the car crash.

"Now youíre here by my side as I lay dying of cancer.

"Iíve given this a lot of thought.

"Ida, darling, youíre a jinx. Get the hell out of my hospital room!"

At some point, you just have to conclude that Obama is our jinx. It doesnít matter if itís on purpose, or by mistake. The man is ruining our lives, our economy, our jobs and, most importantly, our childrenís future.

And by the way, it isnít just America heís brought bad luck to. Obama hasnít exactly been a good-luck charm for the people of the EU, Israel, Egypt, Syria, Libya, Iran, Afghanistan, North Korea or Ukraine either.

Obama is quite simply a jinx. Bad news. A storm cloud from hell. A walking disaster. He destroys whatever he touches ó except for China and Russia. Those two evil empires suddenly turned best friends forever are thriving. All of our losses appear to be their gains.

Remember when Obama leaned over and whispered to the President of Russia that after his re-election heíd have "more flexibility" to help out Putin? Donít look now, but itís happening exactly as Obama whispered. Iím just surprised he didnít whisper in Russian.

It seems every country in the world has been badly damaged by the policies of Obama ó except Russia and China. Our decline is their shining moment. Suddenly, the world is Putinís oyster. Suddenly, our military is a feckless joke, incapable of stopping Russiaís expansion plans. Suddenly, our obsession with green energy allows Russiaís economy to soar with energy revenues. Suddenly, our economy is stuck in reverse, while Chinaís economy explodes. Coincidence?

Funny how all this worked out. Makes you think, doesnít it?

Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. God bless America.





Is The Most Powerful Republican In The United States Congress, John Boehner, Stupid, Bought And Paid For, Or On The Other Side With Obama And The Democrats?: All Three Is The Resoundingly Disgusting Answer!!
Nothing else explains the news that the GOP intends to pass immigration reform (i.e. amnesty for illegal immigrants who will be future Democrat voters). Democrats are on the run. They are about to be destroyed in November. Every poll shows it. There are literally no voters left to support Obama who arenít being bribed with a government check. Knowing this, why would the leader of Congressional Republicans want to change the conversation? Why would he want to let Obama off the hook? Why would he discuss anything but Obamacare for the next six months? Doesnít Boehner want to win? When youíve got the opposition on the run, why would you lift your boot off their neck? Makes me wonder which team heís playing for? What about you?


Is The Most Powerful Republican In The United States Congress, John Boehner, Stupid, Bought And Paid For, Or On The Other Side With Obama And The Democrats?: All Three Is The Resoundingly Disgusting Answer!!

Is John Boehner Stupid, Bought, Or On The Other Side?

May 2, 2014 by Wayne Allyn Root ó Personal Liberty Digest

Watch the video here ó http://personalliberty.com/john-boehner-stupid-bought-side/ ó or read the text of it below:

Hello, Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty.

Something is wrong with the most powerful Republican in the United States Congress. Speaker of the House John Boehner is either stupid, bought and paid for by crony corporate interests, or heís on the other side (a Democrat posing as a Republican). Because nothing else explains the news that the GOP intends to pass immigration reform (i.e. amnesty) this year.

You might be wondering how I know itís "amnesty?" Because to pass it through Harry Reidís Senate and to avoid a veto from President Obama, it must include some form of amnesty for illegal immigrants (i.e. future Democratic voters). Nothing could ever pass Harry Reidís Senate that doesnít include some form of amnesty, allowing Democrats to wear the crown of conquering heroes to the Latino community and therefore garner more votes for Team Obama in November. Democrats are on the run. They are about to be destroyed in November. Every poll shows it. Democrats are on the run. They are about to be destroyed in November. Every poll shows it. 

Democrats are about to be crushed. They are drowning. They are desperate to shuffle the deck. Why would any sane GOP leader throw them a life preserver?

Chuck Schumer ó the ultimate liberal ó is winking and nodding on Sunday morning TV shows like itís a done deal. Do you think heís winking because heís just agreed in the backroom to a deal that hurts Democratic voters? Do you think the President that has, for all intents and purposes halted deportations, would agree to any bill that sells illegal immigrants down the river? If you believe that, I have a bridge to sell you inÖ Mexico.

Now letís examine why even discussing (let alone passing) any immigration bill is self-destructive, stupid and political suicide for Republicans.

First, Democrats are on the run. They are about to be destroyed in November. Every poll shows it. Every bit of common sense tells the same story. Every conversation with average middle class Americans proves it. Obamacare has ruined Obama and the Democratic Party. The latest poll shows Obama at 41 percent approval. There are literally no voters left to support Obama who arenít being bribed with a government check. Just as I reported earlier this year, Obamaís support among the actual taxpayers, business owners and homeowners of America is darn close to zero.

Knowing this, why would the leader of Congressional Republicans want to change the conversation? Why would he want to let Obama off the hook? Why would he discuss anything but Obamacare for the next six months? Doesnít Boehner want to win? When youíve got the opposition on the run, why would you lift your boot off their neck? Makes me wonder which team heís playing for? What about you?

Why wouldnít any sane GOP leader keep talking Obamacare 24/7 for six months in a row, until the clock runs out? Millions have lost their coverage; millions more have had premiums raised; millions have lost their doctors; everyone that can think is steaming mad.

The vast majority of people who got free insurance from Obamacare are virtually 100 percent government-addicted, welfare-loving, food stamp-loving, dependent Democratic voters. Obama hasnít picked up one vote. But heís gotten millions of independents mad as a hornetís nest.

To change the conversation now would be dereliction of duty. If this were the military, General Boehner would be relieved of his command and brought up on criminal charges. He is harming his own troops. He is purposely losing the war. He is pulling defeat from the jaws of victory. Who does that?

Secondly, my grandfather taught me about how to treat your loyal customers. He was a successful small business owner. He always said the key to success was "the customer is always right." Why would Boehner poke a stick in the eyes of his best customers? Why would he mock conservatives? Why would he turn off his loyal conservative base now, on the precipice of a landslide in November? It defies logic.

Third and most importantly, if everyone "in the know" believes the GOP is on the verge of a massive landslide victory (and they are), why would you even think of negotiating an immigration reform bill now? Think about it. Now itís a lose/lose. Obama and Reid hold all the cards. But starting in January of 2015, with a GOP Senate and House; and Obama an embarrassed, emasculated lame duck; the GOP would hold all the cards.

What Republican leader would be dumb enough to pass the bill now? Wait until 2015 and instead of begging for crumbs, the GOP is dictating the terms of Obamaís surrender. What sane leader would trade a win/win for a lose/lose scenario?

Into this situation steps John Boehner, leader of the party that practices shooting itself in the foot. Boehner is theoretically on our side, yet he wants to let Democrats off the hook for Obamacare; change the conversation to something divisive and controversial; demoralize and anger his own best customers; hand a moral victory to Obama; inspire the Democratsí core voters; and negotiate from the worst possible position, instead of waiting just a few months to negotiate from the best possible position.

Does any of this make sense to you? So I ask youÖ

Is John Boehner stupid, bought and paid for, or on the other side? Heís either not thinking clearly, or heís not on our side. No matter your answer, itís now clear Boehner has to go.

Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. God Bless America and save us from the Marxist in the White House intent on destroying capitalism and wiping out the middle classÖ and the feckless, floundering, cowardly or traitorous Republicans in Congress who refuse to stand up to him.





This Hush-Hush Interstate Compact Sponsored By George Soros & The Left Could End Any Chance To Ever Again Elect A Republican As President: It will pretty much let the Northeast, the West Coast and Chicago decide who will occupy the White House
The National Popular Vote (NPV) interstate compact says that a State must award ďall of its electoral votes" to whichever candidate for president wins the national popular vote ó "regardless of how the citizens of that State vote". If it takes effect, it gives an overwhelmingly unfair advantage to the Democrat candidate since the Democrats control the votes in the most populous areas of the country. The NPV has already been approved in 10 Obama voting states and has been approved by at least one legislative body in another 10 states. The total electoral votes of these 20 states is 243. Since it takes 270 electoral votes to select the next President, the NPV could soon be only 27 electoral votes shy of manipulating future presidential elections.


This Hush-Hush Interstate Compact Sponsored By George Soros & The Left Could End Any Chance To Ever Again Elect A Republican As President: It will pretty much let the Northeast, the West Coast and Chicago decide who will occupy the White House

A Stealth Threat To The Constitution

April 24, 2014 by Chip Wood ó Personal Liberty Digest

It isnít often that youíll see a large majority of Republicans and Democrats in Congress agree on something. But they did last week, when members of the House and Senate tried to ban an Iranian diplomat from entering this country.

In a real "poke us in the eye" move, Iran had announced it was naming Hamid Aboutalebi as its new ambassador to the United Nations. It just so happens that Aboutalebi was one of the leaders of the mob that stormed the U.S. embassy in Tehran back in 1979 and took 52 Americans hostage. As you may recall, they were kept in captivity for 444 days and were released only when Ronald Reagan succeeded Jimmy Carter as President.

When Iran said it was appointing Aboutalebi as its ambassador to the U.N., Tea Party favorite Ted Cruz (R-Texas) immediately introduced a measure in Congress to ban him from stepping on U.S. soil. The measure passed by voice votes in both the House and Senate, without a single dissenting vote.

When the bill got to Barack Obamaís desk, the President signed it ó then promptly announced that he wasnít going to enforce it. He attached a signing statement that said he would treat the bill "as advisory in circumstances."

Of course, this isnít the first time Obama has decided to pick and choose which laws his Administration will enforce and which ones it will ignore. This is just business as usual for the Obama White House.

One thing that definitely isnít business as usual is a measure making its way through various State legislatures that will dramatically affect the way this country chooses its President. At least one analyst believes that if enough States pass it, it will mean the end of any chance to ever again elect a Republican as President.

Iím referring to the National Popular Vote (NPV) interstate compact. If youíve never heard of it, Iím not surprised. The left is keeping this George Soros-sponsored effort very hush-hush. But you need to know about it, since its adoption could render meaningless the votes of you and your friends for a Republican candidate for the Nationís highest office.

Basically, the NPV says that a State must award all of its electoral votes to whichever candidate for president wins the national popular vote ó regardless of how the citizens of that State vote.

In other words, if this measure takes effect and the Republican candidate receives the most votes in your State but his Democrat opponent gets the most votes nationally, then all of your Stateís electoral votes will go to the Democrat. Howís that for making your State election meaningless?

Political analyst Dick Morris said, "If this thing passes, Republicans will never again win a presidential race and thatís why all the Democrats are lining up behind it."

Does the NPV really have a chance of becoming the law of the land in this country? Iím sorry to say the answer is an emphatic "yes." Last week, New York became the 10th State to pass it. The measure was approved last month by both branches of New Yorkís State Legislature and was signed into law last week by Governor Andrew Cuomo.

"With the passage of this legislation," Cuomo declared, "New York is taking a bold step to fundamentally increase the strength and fairness of our nationís presidential elections."

No, what New York has done is take a bold step toward making sure that the Democrats never relinquish control of the White House.

Harvard Law School professor Alan Dershowitz is one of the few liberals who have spoken out against NVP. He said that it "certainly violates the spirit of the Constitution." And he added, "Plainly, the founders of the Constitution did not intend for there to be a conspiracy among certain states to essentially abolish the Electoral College."

Back in the time when the Founding Fathers created the Electoral College, we didnít have the instant communications we enjoy today. It took a while to learn what happened in another part of the country.

That is why the framers of our Constitution decided to have representatives from each State gather together once every four years to elect a President and Vice President. They gave the responsibility of deciding who would be an elector to the individual States, because they were avid believers in limiting the power of the new Federal government as much as possible. Check out the Bill of Rights, and especially the 9th and 10th Amendments, to confirm this.

Do we still need an Electoral College to elect the President and Vice President? Maybe not. But if weíre going to change a system thatís worked for more than 200 years, letís do it the way the Founding Fathers intended, by amending the Constitution. Not by a sneaky end-run around the Constitution.

You can tell a lot about which side wants this measure passed by looking at the States that have already ratified it. In addition to New York, the nine other States are California, Illinois, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington. The District of Columbia has also signed the compact.

All of them voted for Obama in 2008 and 2012. All of them are a deep, deep blue. All of them have a vested interest in keeping the entitlements coming from the Federal government. Altogether, these jurisdictions control 165 electoral votes.

Newsmax reported: "It also has been approved by at least one legislative body in these states: Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, and Oregon."

If all 10 of these States also approve the compact, that will be another 78 electoral votes. Since it takes 270 electoral votes to select the next President, that would leave the measure only 27 electoral votes shy of the number needed to take effect.

If your State is one of the 10 where the compact has already been approved in one branch of the Legislature, youíd better get busy. Contact your State representatives and get them to agree to defeat this end run around the Constitution.

And if your State hasnít made either list, donít think for a moment that you donít have anything to worry about. Chances are that there are people hard at work behind the scenes in your State capital promoting this measure.

If NPV does become the law of the land, it will pretty much let the Northeast, the West Coast and Chicago decide who will occupy the White House. And all the red States will be effectively disenfranchised.

If you donít want to live in the result, youíd better get busy and stop the NPV.

Until next time, keep some powder dry.

ĖChip Wood





Standing Up To Government Is Now Labeled Domestic Terrorism: However, the real domestic terrorists are not the American people; they are Reid, Obama, Boehner and the rest of the political and bureaucratic class who ignore the rule of law and oppress the American people
The U.S. government is a democracy in name only. In truth, it is fascist and ruled by one party with two names under the control of the globalists.The only goal of the globalists and their psychopathic political class stooges is to loot and pillage. They have done so to the point that America is now a giant rock rolling downhill toward collapse. As regimes get closer to collapse, they inflict increasingly greater pain and controls on their people. It is now evident in America for those who would see it. The domestic terrorists in question are not the American people. They are Reid, Obama, Boehner and the rest of the political and bureaucratic class who ignore the rule of law and oppress the American people.


Standing Up To Government Is Now Labeled Domestic Terrorism: However, the real domestic terrorists are not the American people; they are Reid, Obama, Boehner and the rest of the political and bureaucratic class who ignore the rule of law and oppress the American people

Standing Up To Government Is Now Domestic Terrorism

April 21, 2014 by Bob Livingston ó Personal Liberty Digest

The political class is now demonstrating a level of hubris rarely, if ever, seen in the American system.

Within just a few hours, three of the top four most post powerful politicians in the country unabashedly revealed the low opinion they have of liberty and the American people and a willingness to persecute, prosecute and lie to those who advocate and fight for Constitutional government. And by their silence, the rest of the political class nodded their agreement.

First, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid called Bunkerville, Nev., rancher Cliven Bundy and the hundreds of Americans who rallied to Bundyís defense domestic terrorists. Then, President Barack Obama brazenly lied to the American people in claiming that 8 million people had signed up for Obamacare and that the program was a success, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. And early Friday morning, we learned Speaker of the House John Boehner has proclaimed once again to big money donors and crony capitalists that an immigration bill would be passed this year over the wishes of the majority of Americans.

Within hours of reports circulating in alternative media of Reidís use of the Bureau of Land Management in his land grab on behalf of a Chinese solar energy firm, BLM pulled its goon squad of armed enforcers out of the area. It also scrambled to delete evidence from its own website that the area the Bundy family has used to graze their cattle is needed for "utility-scale solar power generation facilities on public lands" and that need was hindered by "trespass grazing" cattle.

Reid and his son Rory have worked in lockstep with the BLM and transnational green energy firms to wrestle land and use rights from American ranchers for years. Bundy is the last rancher standing in an area that once saw dozens of them.

What few reports on the standoff between Bundy and BLM that have made it into the mainstream media speciously claim the Bundy ranch is some 200 miles from the proposed site of the ENN Energy Groupís solar farm and panel building plant, and that the ENN project was shelved last year. Even the supposedly reliable "right wing" websites Breitbart.com and Glenn Beckís The Blaze have carried the Federal governmentís water on this dispute. The two-faced Beck ó who has called for a pitchfork revolution and sells shirts calling for one ó even went so far as to call Bundy supporters "frightening" and compared them with Occupy Wall Street, which was a CIA-funded operation designed to foment unrest in America.

Claims have also been made that the Federal government owns the land in question. But the Constitution specifically describes in Article I, Section 8 what land the Federal government can possess, and there are subsequent Supreme Court decisions that lay out the legal framework. (Hint: It does not include protecting tortoises or building solar plants.)

A BLM document discusses the Dry Lake Solar Energy Zone and specifically mentions the Gold Butte area (which includes Bunkerville) and "cattle trespass grazing" as being part of critical concern to future utility-scale solar energy development. In short, Reid is using the BLM (headed by his lackey and former adviser Neil Kornze) to turn all Nevada "Federal lands" into a green energy zone for his and his sonís personal gain and Bundyís cattle are hindering this effort. This is proven by information on the BLM website (since removed) that states grazing by Bundyís cattle "impacts" solar development and the construction of solar development on public lands.

Understand the implications of Reidís claim that those who bravely stood with Bundy, stared into the barrels of heavily armed oppressors who were threatening to shoot them and faced down the BLMís armed goons are "domestic terrorists."

Thanks to the National Defense Authorization Act, the government can simply designate Americans as terrorists and they can then be disappeared into gulags never to be charged, tried or heard from again. Habeas corpus, in the cases deemed "domestic terrorism," is now nonexistent. Obama has already ordered drone strikes to kill Americans in foreign lands without due process. The step from indiscriminate extrajudicial killings of American "terrorists"  overseas to indiscriminate extrajudicial killings of "domestic terrorists" in America has just been shortened considerably.

This is common knowledge in circles of people who depend upon the alternative media and understand the truth about the Federal police state. Donít think that Reid is not aware of this. And he understands that those who sided with the Bundys recognize this as well.

Reid is too savvy and too skilled a politician to make a slip of the tongue statement accusing Americans of domestic terrorism.

Obamaís claim that 8 million people have now signed up for Obamacare and the law is working as intended is an incredible stretch even for a man who is such a consummate liar that more than half of Americans know he lies on important issues. The law is working "so well" that even in the face of monetary penalties, tens of millions of people who are eligible to sign up for Obamacare insurance have avoided doing so.

Boehner is said to be "hell-bent" on passing an amnesty bill this year. This has been an important issue for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce for some time and is, therefore, an important issue for the Republican establishment.

Understand that, for the Republican elite, amnesty is not about trying to win over Hispanics in order to bolster chances for carrying national elections. Itís about providing cheap labor for big corporations. The plight of millions of unemployed Americans does not concern the establishment.

I have been writing for many years that the U.S. government is democracy in name only. In truth, it is fascist and ruled by one party with two names under the control of the globalists.

The only goal of the globalists and their psychopathic political class stooges is to loot and pillage. They have done so to the point that America is now a giant rock rolling downhill toward collapse.

As regimes get closer to collapse, they inflict increasingly greater pain and controls on their people. It is now evident in America for those who would see it.

The domestic terrorists in question are not the American people. They are Reid, Obama, Boehner and the rest of the political and bureaucratic class who ignore the rule of law and oppress the American people.





If You Believe Obamaís Lie That Obamacare Is A Success Because of 7.1 Million Enrollees, Youíre Probably An Obama Apologist Or A Fool Or Both
Obamacare is a success only because itís accomplishing exactly what its statist crafters envisioned ó itís locking people into a socialistic redistributionist death-care system controlled by a few elites. Gullible Democrats & Obamaphiles continue to buy the lie that Obamacare is about insuring the uninsured. If you still ride that bandwagon, these facts probably wonít knock you off of it: By the fall of 2014 Obamacare will have caused more than twice as many to lose health insurance than have gotten insurance under the law; Obamacare has resulted in $70 billion a year in lost wages and about 3 million workers losing their jobs; there are premium increases of 200% to 600%; in New York, 44% of doctors have refused to participate in the exchanges; deductibles are ranging between $5,000 and $10,000 on Obamacare plans; and etc..


If You Believe Obamaís Lie That Obamacare Is A Success Because of 7.1 Million Enrollees, Youíre Probably An Obama Apologist Or A Fool Or Both

Obamacare Is A Success

April 18, 2014 by Bob Livingston ó Personal Liberty Digest

There are only so many ways to call President Barack Obama a liar (and Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid and all the other Obamacare apologists) and describe the evil nature of his signature wealth redistribution and deathcare scheme: Obamacare. The English language, or at least my grasp of it, is wholly inadequate for the task.

Itís become so bad that writing just this short piece on more Obamacare lies was an arduous task that took far longer than it should. Every lede I began sounded trite and clichťd because every one has been written before.

Gullible Democrats and Obamaphiles bought the lie ó and in many cases continue to buy the lie ó that Obamacare was about insuring the uninsured. If you still ride that bandwagon and what Iím about to tell you doesnít knock you off it, there is little hope anything will.

According to numbers touted by Obamacare advocates in the run-up to the lawís unConstitutional passage in early 2010 (laws raising revenue must originate in the House and Obamacare ó which is a tax, according to the Supreme Court ó originated in the Senate), somewhere between 32 million to 47 million Americans were uninsured. Thatís not to say they were uninsurable. They were just uninsured.

Whichever number you settled on, that number, of course, was completely contrived. It was a combination of people who were self-insured, those who chose not to buy insurance, those temporarily between jobs, illegal aliens and a group of about 10 million who were truly unable to purchase healthcare insurance because of pre-existing conditions.

Now Obama is touting his 7.1 million Obamacare enrollees as a success.

Letís look at the real numbers. According to estimates by the RAND Corporation, two-thirds of those Obama claims signed up by the deadline were previously insured. That means only 2 million to 2.4 million were previously uninsured.

Also, those who missed the March 31 enrollment deadline (for whatever reason) are now unable to sign up for insurance until Nov. 15 unless they have a qualifying "life event." A qualifying event includes a marriage, divorce, the birth of a child, a move to another State, lose a job, age out of their parentsí policy, etc. Without a qualifying event, they will remain uninsured.

According to insurance companies, somewhere between 10 percent and 20 percent of those who did sign up through Healthcare.gov and other exchanges have not paid their first premium. The law requires anyone who has not paid after three months to be kicked off the rolls. Once they are kicked off the rolls for nonpayment, they wonít be eligible for insurance without a qualifying event. They will remain uninsured.

If 10 percent of those previously uninsured who have signed up for health insurance are kicked off the rolls, then only 1.8 million people who were previously uninsured can credit Obamacare  for their insurance. Thatís only 5.6 percent.

Obama has a pretty low bar by which he measures success.

And here are some more numbers to consider:

ē 4.5 million policies were canceled because they didnít meet Obamacare standards. It didnít matter whether the holders of those policies were satisfied or not.

ē 16 million more policies are expected to be canceled at the next renewal because they wonít comply with Obamacare standards. It doesnít matter whether the policyholders are satisfied or not. That means that by this fall, Obamacare will have caused more than twice as many to lose health insurance than have gotten insurance under the law.

ē Obamacare has resulted in $70 billion a year in lost wages and about 3 million workers losing their jobs.

ē Deductibles are ranging between $5,000 and $10,000 on Obamacare plans.

ē We are seeing premium increases of 200 percent to 600 percent.

ē In New York, 44 percent of doctors have refused to participate in the exchanges.

ē Getting a small raise in salary can cost thousands of dollars in "subsidies."

ē Itís added and adding information into the dossier the government has on all Americans.

But donít say Obamacare is a failure. Itís accomplishing exactly what its statist crafters envisioned. Itís locking people into a socialistic redistributionist deathcare system controlled by a few elites.





Will Women Voters Be Gullible Enough To Yet Again Buy This Obama Lie and Keep His America Destroying Agenda Empowered Via The November Elections?
Yet another desperate effort by the Democrats to come up with something that will distract voters from Obamacare, an incredibly unpopular piece of legislation, so it is not the No. 1 issue in the November elections. Once again that distraction is a promise to end the gender wage gap & to blame Republicans for hating women. All of this is a huge lie of course. Itís true that women, on average, earn less than men. But this is almost always because of career & life choices, not because of sexual discrimination. Equal pay for equal work has been the law in this country for years. For Democrats desperate for a way to divert attention from their disastrous healthcare plan & the sad state of the economy, itís a simple choice. Which will get them the most publicity and the most votes? Tell the truth or fudge the facts? Will women buy this Obama lie?


Will Women Voters Be Gullible Enough To Yet Again Buy This Obama Lie and Keep His America Destroying Agenda Empowered Via The November Elections?

Will Women Buy This Obama Lie?

April 17, 2014 by Chip Wood ó Personal Liberty Digest

Welcome to yet another desperate effort by the Democrats to come up with something ó anything ó that will distract voters from Obamacare.

Forget the absurdity Nancy Pelosi is trying to peddle, that the Senators and Representatives who shoved this monstrosity down our throats should be proud to embrace it. Too many Democratic candidates running for re-election know how unpopular Obamacare is with their constituents. Embracing it would be the kiss of death.

So itís no surprise that they will try anything to keep this incredibly unpopular piece of legislation from being the No. 1 issue in the November elections. What can they do to energize their base and get voters eager to support them again? How about going back to the well for an issue that worked very well the last time out: accusing the Republicans of conducting a "war on women"?

Yes, thatís the ticket. What better way to get the troops ready for battle than to trumpet a promise to end the gender wage gap? The President repeated a line from his State of the Union address in January, that women earn only 77 cents for every dollar that a man does. That should get the feminine blood boiling.

"Equal pay for equal work ó itís not that complicated," the President declared. He promised to push for passage of something called the Paycheck Fairness Act. And he said he would immediately sign two executive orders related to the issue. After all, why wait for those old fuddy-duddies in Congress to act? He had warned us that he has "a phone and a pen." And by golly, heíd use them both.

All of this is a bunch of utter baloney, of course. Itís true that women, on average, earn less than men. But this is almost always because of career and life choices, not because of sexual discrimination. Equal pay for equal work has been the law in this country for several years.

There are several reasons for the pay disparity. For one, "full time" does not mean the same thing for women as it does for men. The Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that men are almost twice as likely as women to work more than 40 hours a week. Women, on the other hand, are almost twice as likely to work 35 to 39 hours a week.

Risk is also an important factor. By and large, men are far more likely to seek out positions that carry physical risk. The BLS reports that 92 percent of work-related deaths in 2012 happened to men. Dangerous jobs tend to pay higher salaries, to attract the workers they need.

Education is another significant factor. Men are more likely to major in such higher-paying areas as finance, accounting or engineering, while women often chose fields of study, such as liberal arts or sociology, that command smaller salaries.

But by far the biggest discrepancies occur when marriage and children are taken into consideration. Mark J. Perry and Andrew G. Biggs, two scholars with the American Enterprise Institute, addressed this topic in a column in The Wall Street Journal:

Child care takes mothers out of the labor market, so when they return they have less work experience than similarly-aged males. Many working mothers seek jobs that provide greater flexibility, such as telecommuting or flexible hours. Not all jobs can be flexible, and all other things being equal, those which are will pay less than those that do not.

That just makes sense, doesnít it? Perry and Biggs say that once these variables are taken into consideration, the so-called gender pay gap virtually disappears. They cite a 2012 study by June and Dave OíNeill, two economists with the American Enterprise Institute, that found "nearly all of the 23% raw gender pay gap cited by Mr. Obama can be attributed to factors other than discrimination."

Oh, and let me add one more argument against the Democratsí contention that pay differences are because of anti-female discrimination, and that only the Federal government can make things right.

Consider this: What if it were true that businesses frequently had a choice between two different potential employees, a male and a female? Both are equally capable. But the woman is willing to do the work for 23 percent less money than the male.

Címon, how many businesses would agree to hire the male at the higher salary, just because they didnít want a woman in the job? Why would any business needlessly give a man more money, rather than add it to their own bottom line? Letís give some credit to the profit motive here, folks.

The latest poll results show why the Democrats are so eager to start beating on the "war on women" drum. In the 2012 Presidential election, Obama received 67 percent of the votes of single women. Clearly, their multimillion-dollar advertising campaign against Mitt Romney and the Republican "war on women" worked.

But now, according to the latest NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll, Obamaís support among single women has dropped to just 48 percent. Better do something to shore up that base! And what better way than to promise to take action to end all that horrible pay inequality in the marketplace?

This is a classic case of "do as we say, not as we do." No sooner had Obama huffed and puffed about the terrible disparity between what women earn in America versus male employees than someone compared salaries among male and female employees in the White House.

Guess what? It turns out that women in the West Wing earn significantly less money than men. Yep, the average female employee in the Obama White House earns just 88 percent as much as the average man.

When asked about this, Obama press secretary Jay Carney could only mumble something about how the White House record is "better than the national average" ó and that female staffers tend to earn less than men because they occupy more of the jobs at the lower end of the pay scale.

Yep. And are you surprised to learn that the same thing happens in the rest of the country, Mr. Carney?

It turns out that the so-called gender pay gap has almost nothing to do with the sex of an employee and almost everything to do with career and life choices. But, of course, acknowledging these facts would mean that the Democrats could no longer beat Republicans over the head with all those "war on women" accusations.

For Democrats desperate for a way to divert attention from their disastrous healthcare plan and the sad state of the economy, itís a simple choice. Which will get them the most publicity and the most votes? Tell the truth or fudge the facts?

Will women buy this Obama lie? Or will a majority see through this effort to enlist them in another phony war? Letís do our part to make sure itís the latter.

Until next time, keep some powder dry.

ĖChip Wood





The Liberal Bigots Strike Again: The Gay and Lesbian Brigade Want Scalps Of Those Who Dare To Disagree With Homosexual Marriage
The most open and blatant example of the left's new fascism, which says, if you don't agree with us 100%, we have the right to punish you unless you're like Hillary and Obama and you recant. The gay-rights organization GLAAD's President & CEO said: "Mozilla's strong statement in favor of equality today reflects where corporate America is: inclusive, safe and welcoming to all. What she meant, of course, was welcoming to everyone who will march in lockstep with the gay rights brigade; if not, they'll go after you, your family, your job and your employer. If you're a Christian photographer or baker who'd prefer to not cover or bake for a gay wedding, they'll go to court and force you to do so. It seems that it is only traditionalists who must demonstrate "tolerance" these days. Apparently, the gay-rights activists can be as bigoted and intolerant as they want.


The Liberal Bigots Strike Again: The Gay and Lesbian Brigade Want Scalps Of Those Who Dare To Disagree With Homosexual Marriage

The Liberal Bigots Strike Again

April 11, 2014 by Chip Wood -- Personal Liberty Digest 

If you support the traditional view that marriage should be between a man and a woman, could that cost you your job? The intolerant left says the answer to that question is a loud and emphatic "Yes!"

Their latest victim is Brendan Eich, an inventor of JavaScript and the co-founder of the Web browser Firefox. Back in 2008, Eich donated $1,000 to the campaign for Proposition 8 in California, a ballot measure that said, "Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California."

Recently, when Eich was named CEO of Mozilla, the company that oversees Firefox, that 6-year-old contribution cost him his job. We're told that half of Mozilla's board of directors resigned to protest Eich's appointment. But that leads to a question: If half the board opposed him, how the heck did he get the job?

The wireless company Credo Mobile launched an online petition demanding that Eich either renounce his beliefs or resign. The petition quickly acquired nearly 75,000 signatures.

OKCupid, a popular online dating service, urged its followers to boycott Firefox to protest Eich's selection. The company posted a letter denouncing the CEO, stating: "Those who seek to deny love and instead enforce misery, shame and frustration are our enemies and we wish them nothing but failure."

Those are pretty harsh words against a person who, in 15 years at Mozilla, had never been accused of demonstrating any prejudice against gay employees -- or anyone, for that matter. In one of his few statements on the subject, Eich said: "I don't want to talk about my personal beliefs because I kept them out of Mozilla all these 15 years we've been going. I don't believe they're relevant."

How he performed on the job didn't matter to the gay and lesbian brigade. They wanted his scalp. And they got it.

After Eich agreed to resign, Mozilla Executive Chairwoman Mitchell Baker issued a statement that said in part, "We know why people are hurt and angry, and they are right: it's because we haven't stayed true to ourselves."

So forcing someone to resign because of a private donation made more than six years ago is how you demonstrate that you've "stayed true to" yourself? Remember, not a single person claims that Eich did anything on the job to demonstrate any kind of anti-gay bias. By all accounts, he was scrupulously fair to everyone.

And bear in mind that, at the time, most of the public said they agreed with him that marriage should be between a man and a woman. Proposition 8 passed easily in California, one of the most liberal States in the Nation, although it was later overturned by the courts. It won the support of a substantial majority of blacks and Hispanics.

In fact, let me mention two prominent Americans who also opposed same-sex marriage back in 2008: Hillary Clinton and President Barack Obama. Of course, both now claim that they've had a change of heart.

More than 35,000 people donated to the campaign for Proposition 8. Thanks to a court ruling, the names of all the contributors -- and in some cases, their addresses and the name of their employers -- have been made public. I wonder how many more will become targets of angry and intolerant gays.

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas warned of this possibility four years ago. In a 2010 dissent to a court decision requiring such disclosure, he wrote:

I cannot endorse a view of the First Amendment that subjects citizens of this Nation to death threats, ruined careers, damaged or defaced property, or pre-emptive and threatening warning letters as the price for engaging in "core political speech," the "primary object of First Amendment protection."

Not every gay person agrees with the angry intolerance Eich witnessed. Andrew Sullivan, a well-known gay-rights activist, wrote:

If we cannot live and work alongside people with whom we deeply disagree, we are finished as a liberal society.

What we have here is a social pressure to keep your beliefs deeply private for fear of retribution. We are enforcing another sort of closet on others. I can't believe the fanaticism.

Just how bad will could this latest form of bigotry get? On Sunday, during an appearance on ABC News -- "This Week," former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said what we're witnessing is the left's "new fascism." He warned:

This is just the most open and blatant example of the new fascism, which says, "If you don't agree with us 100 percent, we have the right to punish you unless you're like Hillary and Barack Obama and you recant.

I think the question I'd ask yourself is: Are you willing to live in an open and tolerant society, or do you have to impose your views at the cost of people's jobs?

One of the most ironic statements on the controversy came from the gay-rights organization GLAAD. President and CEO Sarah Kate Ellis said: "Mozilla's strong statement in favor of equality today reflects where corporate America is: inclusive, safe and welcoming to all."

Yes, the GLAAD's leader actually said "welcoming to all." What she meant, of course, was welcoming to everyone who will march in lockstep with GLAAD. If you dare to disagree with the gay rights brigade and they find out about it, watch out. They'll go after you, your family, your job and your employer.

If you're a Christian photographer who'd prefer to not to cover a gay wedding, they'll go to court and force you to do so. If you're a baker who has religious objections to a gay marriage, you'd better not decline to bake a wedding cake for a gay couple or you might get sued.

It seems that it is only traditionalists who must demonstrate "tolerance" these days. Apparently, the gay-rights activists can be as bigoted and intolerant as they want.

Welcome to the Brave New World of America in 2014. If you don't like it, you'd better do something about it.

Until next time, keep some powder dry.

--Chip Wood





Obamaís Blind Believers: Liberal Ignorance Is Our Damnation As Most Liberals Are Too Stupid To Argue With
Despite abysmal poll ratings, millions of Americans still trust Obama and believe he is doing a fine job as President. It is tantamount to believing the Titanic was on course even after her bow tipped forward into the icy-cold North Atlantic. So it is for liberals vested in Obama: the healthcare President whose signature Obamacare is collapsing, the bipartisan President who has yet to reach across the aisle except to pick up his golf clubs, the healing President who has widened the divide between blacks and whites. Yet loyal Democrats continue to believe utter foolishness: that Obama is a good President and that the Republicans, the Tea Party, Rush Limbaugh, Sarah Palin and perhaps even Elvisí evil twin are the reason Obamaís Presidency has failed. The one question that is never asked in liberal corners is whether Obama was ever competent to be President of the United States?


Obamaís Blind Believers: Liberal Ignorance Is Our Damnation As Most Liberals Are Too Stupid To Argue With

April Fooled? You Must Be A Liberal

April 2, 2014 by John Meyers ó Personal Liberty Digest

When I was in South Africa with my uncle, Dick, we were part of a travel group from the United States. On our manifest was a diamond mine tour in Gauteng. We walked about where the Great Star of Africa, a pear-shaped diamond weighing 530.20 carats, had been discovered.

Dick and I were more interested in the labor situation than we were in stumbling over a diamond. Just as well, because it turned out to be a dreadfully boring tour; that is, until it was over. Thatís when our group was directed towards the mineís exit. We all lined up like schoolchildren behind what looked like a customs booth that had crashed smack onto the desert.

I nudged Dick in the ribs when I noticed why it was taking us so long to get to our air-conditioned bus. It was a scene right out of a Monty Python sketch. An interrogator ó in a uniform replete with a Gestapo-type cap ó sat inside a Plexiglas cubicle, and each of us had to pass by him.

When it was my turn, he instructed me to raise my left hand, palm facing out. It was then that a large and flat aluminum square was hand-cranked toward me, waist high. I stood, staring at it.

"Are you ready to give your sworn statement?" asked my adjudicator.

"Sure, why not?"

"Keep your left hand raised and place your right hand squarely on the Ďtruth-plate,í fingers spread. Look at me, and then answer my question: Do you have any diamonds on your person or have you seen anyone on site pick up a diamond today?"

I started laughing. This was no lie detector. I had been around lie detectors, and this was a gag show for the terminally stupid. Dick kicked me sharp in the ankle and leaned into my ear, saying: "Cut it out!"

I kept myself together and declared that, no, I was not carrying any diamonds on me and, no, I had not seen anyone in the group pick any up.

A green light that looked like an old traffic light came on. The makeshift door to my right opened, and I walked through it and toward our bus, laughing like hell.

When all of us were back on board, a married couple from Vermont tore into me about how I could have gotten the tour group into trouble. They were diehard Democrats and took authority most seriously. In fact, they actually believed that what we had been questioned on was a real lie detector.

I said something to them that probably wasnít all that polite, and my uncle settled me down with a sip from his gin mickey tucked into his sports jacket. He shared with me an important truth that day: Some people are simply too stupid to argue with.

Obamaís Blind Believers

Despite abysmal poll ratings, millions of Americans still trust Barack Obama and believe he is doing a fine job as President.

It is tantamount to believing the Titanic was on course even after her bow tipped forward into the icy-cold North Atlantic. Yet we know that a few minutes before that moment, many on board still believed the Titanic would right herself. What else could they believe? Everything for those on board was vested in the Titanic being what everyone had claimed it was: unsinkable.

So it is for liberals vested in Obama: the healthcare President whose signature Obamacare is collapsing, the bipartisan President who has yet to reach across the aisle except to pick up his golf clubs, the healing President whose five years in office have seen a spike in racial tensions and whose personal utterances from the Oval Office have only widened the divide between blacks and whites.

Yet loyal Democrats continue to believe utter foolishness: that Obama is a good President and that the Republicans, the Tea Party, Rush Limbaugh, Sarah Palin and perhaps even Elvisí evil twin are the reason Obamaís Presidency has failed. The one question that is never asked in liberal corners is whether Obama was ever competent to be President of the United States?

Liberal Ignorance Is Our Damnation       

After I graduated university, I spent a year in journalism school. That education paid off handsomely. I was taught to assume Iím being lied to when tracking down a story because I probably am.

Questioning everything is hard work. Since people tend to be lazy, this gives liberals a big advantage over libertarians. By the millions, liberals assume a litany of stupid ideas, including:

ē Man-made climate change is an absolute fact.

ē "Stand your ground" laws are racist and only serve to endanger African-Americans.

ē Unless shown the righteous path, white people are ó and will always remain ó racists.

ē Obama is the one person most qualified to show white people the evil of their racist past.

ē Black people are hardly ever racist toward whites.

ē Gay people are kind and progressive. Only people that oppose gay marriage are ignorant.

ē Obama cares deeply about America and preserving the U.S. Constitution.

ē The Federal government, led by Obama, wants to help all Americans.

ē Obama knows better than we do as to what must be done to help America.

Donít take my word for it. Just watch CNN. Itís running ads that actually say: "Watch Don Lemon tonight.  He will tell you what stories really matter."

My problem is I donít want an openly gay civil rights activist telling me what is important. I want to figure that out for myself. That in itself is the difference between a libertarian and a liberal.

Yours in good times and bad,

ĖJohn Myers





Obamaís USA Is Starting To Look Like The Grim Early Days Of Maoís Communist China
The Similarities ó Land Reform: the government takes land from landowners & gives it to large corporations through a blend of fascism & socialism. Suicide Epidemic: among young people in the USA, suicide is the 3rd most common cause of death; among all Americans, suicide claims more lives than car accidents which were previously the leading cause of death. Media Suppression & Targeting: groups are targeted by the IRS for having opposing views & in the mainstream media you cannot speak out against the Obama regime. Only Those In Government Prosper: government workers get paid 45% more than workers in the private market; the Washington, DC area has 6 of the 10 most affluent counties in the USA. Lies & Statistics: all government statistics are heavily manipulated -- 23% is the real unemployment figure. Famine & Starvation: 1 in 6 Americans & 1 in 4 children are on food stamps.


Obamaís USA Is Starting To Look Like The Grim Early Days Of Maoís Communist China

Obamaís U.S. Is Starting To Look Like The Early Days Of Maoís Communist China

March 21, 2014 by The Dollar Vigilante óPersonal Liberty Digest

Many people like to watch movies or read novels as a way to relax and get away from work and other stresses of day-to-day life. I, on the other hand, find nonfiction to be much more interesting than almost anything dreamed up by a fiction writer. So when I want to relax and get away from things, I like to read nonfiction books and documentaries.

Given what is going on in China lately, I have been nearly obsessed with learning about Chinaís history. It is easily one of the most interesting cultures on Earth, with thousands of years of dynasties, warlords, communism, capitalism, wars and atrocities.

Of all the atrocities, the worst by far was committed during Mao Zedongís Communist China revolution and the typically Orwellian-named, "The Great Leap Forward."

That leap eventually ended up with the deaths and starvation of somewhere between 20 million and 45 million people. Despite this devastation, American oligarch David Rockefeller said this of the period: "Whatever the price of the Chinese revolution, it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also in fostering high morale and community of purpose. The social experiment in China under Chairman Maoís leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history."

As I watched a recent documentary on this period, it struck me how eerily similar the early years of Mao, leading to those deaths, were to todayís United States and Obama.

The Similarities

Hope and change: As with Obama, Mao was swept into power under great fanfare as a savior by a society of people who had been so impoverished and war-torn that they put their faith in this man with his ideas. As with Obama, the first few years didnít go too terribly, giving some people hope. But soon after taking power in 1950, Mao quickly got China involved in the Korean War.

Land reform: During that same period, Mao went to work on taking land away from landowners and giving it to the people. Done differently, but with the same end goal, the U.S. has been decimating small-farm owners through regulations, taxes and even armed raids, ending up with large corporations owning more and more of the productive land. The large corporations, through the U.S. blend of fascism and socialism, end up owning more and more of the land. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the number of farms in the United States has fallen from about 6.8 million in 1935 to only about 2 million today. According to Farm Aid, every week some 330 farmers leave their land for good. This isnít done as overtly as it was during Maoís time of just killing landowners, as the U.S. government has perfected propaganda; but the end result is essentially the same.

Suicides: In Shanghai during that time, suicide by jumping from tall buildings became so commonplace that residents avoided walking on the pavement near skyscrapers for fear that suicides might land on them. In the U.S. today, even The New Yorker writes about the "suicide epidemic." Between 1999 and 2010, the number of Americans between the ages of 35 and 64 who took their own lives rose by almost 30 percent. Among young people in the United States, suicide is the third most common cause of death; among all Americans, suicide claims more lives than car accidents, which were previously the leading cause of injury-related death.

Media suppression and targeting: Mao launched the "Hundred Flowers Campaign" urging all those with different opinions to express themselves. It was a ruse, however; and he used this to target opponents, eventually killing 500,000 landowners. In the United States it is done differently; but groups, like the Tea Party, have been targeted by the Internal Revenue Service for having opposing views. And it is well known in the mainstream media that you cannot speak out against the current regime. Journalist Abdulelah Haider Shaye was imprisoned under Obamaís orders for speaking out about U.S. involvement in the Mideast. And, currently, according to Reporters Without Borders, the U.S. stands at No. 46 on the World Press Freedom Index, just after Romania and one ahead of Haiti.

Only those in government prospered: During Maoís time, it was said that only those in government and those in the capital cities connected to the government prospered. This is very similar to what is happening today in the United States. Government workers currently get paid 45 percent more than their counterparts in the private market. And while most of the country languishes in depression-level conditions, Washington, D.C., is flourishing. The Washington metro area includes a whopping six of the 10 most affluent counties in the Nation.

Lies and statistics: As things got worse in Maoís China, the government took to overtly lying about nearly every statistic. It lied egregiously about crop production and the number of deaths due to starvation. Doctors were not allowed to list "starvation" as a cause of death. In the United States it is similar in that nearly all government statistics are heavily manipulated to paint a better picture of what is really going on. Unemployment figures, for one, are adjusted so that if people give up looking for work they are not counted as being "unemployed" anymore. The U.S. government currently says that the rate of unemployment is 7.3 percent. However, the percentage of the population that is employed is at lows not seen in 40 years. And computing the unemployment numbers the way they were computed prior to 1994 (before they took out "long-term discouraged workers" from the figures), as computed by Shadowstats.com, shows an unemployment rate of 23 percent.

Famine and starvation: As things got worse, by the end of the 1950s, tens of millions of Chinese died of starvation. The United States has much more past wealth to live upon and still has the printing of the U.S. dollar to keep things more afloat temporarily; but even with these advantages, one in six Americans is on food stamps. And 1 in 4 children in the United States is on food stamps. In other words, already, a very large percentage of the population cannot even afford food to eat without assistance. Without government assistance, they would starve.

The Differences

It should be said that China in the mid-20th century and the United States in the early 21st century are two very different places. China, at that time, was a very poor and backward place, whereas the United States ó due to semi-free markets for centuries ó is incredibly advanced and has built up a lot of wealth.

As well, communication technologies such as the Internet do not allow most governmentís today to wholesale slaughter people. In the United States today, these same goals are undertaken through fines, taxation, regulation, inflation and criminalizing nearly every human activity. Nearly half of all people under the age of 23 in the United States today have been arrested, and the U.S. has the worldís largest prison population (25 percent of the prisoners, yet only 5 percent of the world population). Through these means, the U.S. government can look to be less heinous than it would by outright murdering thousands or millions of people but essentially with the same results.

Because of these differences, we should not expect to see the United States follow the exact same path of Maoís China. But the similarities of the two times are striking.

Spend! Spend! Spend!: The U.S. government has been spending and going into deficits at rates that would have shocked people even 15 years ago. The debt of the U.S. government has increased $6.666 trillion since Obama took office. When Obama was first inaugurated on Jan. 20, 2009, the debt of the U.S. government was $10,626,877,048,913.08, according to the Treasury Departmentís Bureau of the Public Debt. As of Jan. 31, the latest day reported, the debt was $17,293,019,654,983.61 ó an increase of $6,666,142,606,070.53. The total debt of the United States did not exceed $6.666 trillion until July 2003. In the little more than five years of the Obama Presidency, the U.S. has accumulated as much new debt as it did in its first 227 years.

Blame the capitalists: Fomenting a class war, the heavily socialist-indoctrinated youth and poor are constantly told "greedy corporations" are causing their problems. This can be seen clearly in all the recent minimum wage rhetoric.

Junk the constitution: The Constitution and the Bill of Rights have been all but ransacked in recent years ó specifically since 9/11 and the Patriot Act. People collecting rainwater or building a pond on their own property or living sustainably off the grid have been deluged by Federal agencies threatening them with massive fines or jail time. And the rising police state and the endless accounts of police brutality are just other examples of this.

Declare a dictatorship: Obama continues to wage wars without approval from Congress, issue executive order edicts and create kill lists. And in his most recent State of the Union address, he even went so far as to say that he was going to go around Congress to get things doneÖ all to wild applause. That is a dictatorship.

The Fall Of America

Those plans, as laid out in the Chicago Tribune cartoon from 1934 are falling exactly into place. That, combined with the fact that Obamaís U.S. is following a very similar path to Maoís China should be enough to make the hairs on the back of your neck stand up.

Unfortunately, it only keeps getting worse. Capital controls are coming into effect in July under the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA); so if you donít have yourself or your wealth well outside of the United States by this point, your time is running out.

For this reason, The Dollar Vigilante has set up an urgent conference called the Crisis Conference, scheduled for April 30  to May 4 in Cabo San Lucas, Mexico. If you still have significant assets inside the United States, I urge you to seriously considering attending.

The U.S. is currently similar to the early days of Mao. How it ends up is anyoneís guess, but it isnít going to be pretty.

Ė Jeff Berwick





Obama Is Creating A Communist Social State and Destroying America By Implementing A Radical 8 Step Plan
1) Healthcare [the most important]Ė Control healthcare & you control the people. 2) PovertyĖ Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control & will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live. 3) Debt Ė Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, & this will produce more poverty. 4) Gun Control Ė Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state. 5) Welfare Ė Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, & Income). 6) Education Ė Take control of what people read & listen to Ė take control of what children learn in school. 7) Religion Ė Remove the belief in God from the Government & schools. 8) Class Warfare Ė Divide the people into the wealthy & the poor. This will cause more discontent & it will be easier to take (Tax)


Obama Is Creating A Communist Social State and Destroying America By Implementing A Radical 8 Step Plan

How To Create A Social State By Saul Alinsky:

Obama writes about Salinsky in his books and Hillary Clinton did her college thesis on his writings.

Saul Alinsky merely simplified Vladimir Lenin's original scheme for world conquest by Communism under Russian rule. Stalin described his Communist converts as "Useful Idiots". The Useful Idiots have destroyed every nation in which they have seized power and control; now the Useful Idiots -- led by "An Useful Idiot's Idiot" known as Barack Obama -- have seized power and control in the USA and are systematically destroying America along with the American Dream.

Alinsky says that there are Eight Levels Of Control [listed below] that must be attained before you are able to create a communist social state and that the first [healthcare] is the most important.

All eight of these are presently being implemented at an "alarming pace" in the USA.

1) Healthcare Ė [the most important] - Control healthcare and you control the people.

2) Poverty Ė Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live.

3) Debt Ė Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty.

4) Gun Control Ė Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state.

5) Welfare Ė Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income).

6) Education Ė Take control of what people read and listen to Ė take control of what children learn in school.

7) Religion Ė Remove the belief in God from the Government and schools.

8) Class Warfare Ė Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor.





White Voters Are Abandoning Obama In Droves: Not because of the color of his skin but because the color of his incompetent, fraudulent, lying policies is red ó communist red
Are all white voters who donít support Obama racists? The very definition of racism is voting for a black candidate because heís black; thatís racism. The fact that 92% of black voters voted for Obama & 96% of black women voted for Obama is racism. White voters are not abandoning Obama in droves because of the color of Obamaís skin but because the color of his policies is red - as in communist red. I hate the policies of Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Clinton & Harry Reid; that does not mean that I hate women or Mormons. White, middle-class Americans are suffering because Obamaís policies are those of of an†incompetent, fraudulent, lying Marxist; we donít care about the color of his skin. Thatís why among Americans who are not†Kool-Aid drinkers blinded by the color of his skin, Obamaís poll numbers are the lowest in history.


White Voters Are Abandoning Obama In Droves: Not because of the color of his skin but because the color of his incompetent, fraudulent, lying policies is red ó communist red

White Voters Abandon Obama In Droves

March 13, 2014 by Wayne Allyn Root óPersonal Liberty Digest

Watch the video here ó http://personalliberty.com/2014/03/13/white-voters-abandon-obama-in-droves/ ó or read the text of it below:

Hello, Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. Have you seen Barack Obamaís poll numbers? They are among the lowest in history. As of last week, Obamaís approval rating is at 38 percent. Thatís just barely above Richard Nixon. But thatís not the big story here.

Keep in mind that Obama has the support of about 35 percent to 40 percent of the population that will never abandon him ó no matter what he does, no matter how bad the jobs numbers look, no matter how low the economy goes, no matter how much scandal and corruption are exposed, no matter how strong the facts are against him. Nothing will ever change their minds. These are the "low-information voters" of the Democratic Party.

In many cases, they love Obama because of the color of his skin ó and nothing else. They will never abandon a black President ó even though black unemployment is at record levels; even though black youth unemployment is at record levels; even though black poverty is at record levels; even though Obamaís exact policies have been in place for more than 50 years in Detroit (a majority black city run by black Democrat politicians) and the black population has been devastated, destroyed and discarded, left for dead in an abandoned, bankrupt city with very few streetlights operating and the police leaving residents in many areas to fend for themselves.

So just think about those poll numbers for a moment. Let those numbers sink in. If 35 percent to 40 percent of the population would support a Democrat for President if he ran from a prison cell, if 35 percent to 40 percent would support Obama no matter what he does, no matter how far America sinks under his leadership (even if they have no jobs and their own lives are in total misery), how could Obamaís approval rating be at only 38 percent?

That means that among the rest of America, outside of loyal, lifelong, Kool-Aid-drinking Democrats, Obamaís ratings are nil. Among voters who donít identify as Democrat, he is the lowest-rated President in history. No numbers like this have ever been recorded, if you filter out the Kool-Aid-drinking low-information and partisan voters.

Obamaís approval among the heartland of America (middle-class Americans) is lower than Nixonís, lower than George W. Bushís, lower than Lyndon Johnsonís at the height of the Vietnam War, lower than Jimmy Carterís at the height of the Iranian hostage crisis with the added burden of an economy in misery and malaise.

Iím betting that outside of lifelong Democrats and welfare recipients (I know; I repeat myself), Obamaís ratings are in the unimaginable range of single digits.

Iím betting that outside of food stamp recipients, Obamaís ratings are in the single digits.

Among the white middle class, Iím betting Obamaís ratings are in the single digitsÖ or lower.

Keep in mind many of the white middle class originally voted for Obama. He could not have been elected without white support.

Among those who actually own small businesses, pay most of the taxes and create most of the jobs, Iím betting Obamaís ratings are in the vicinity of zero.

Actually, if you take the white middle class and subtract out a few Ivy League intellectuals, Hollywood liberals and pathetic Upper West Side of Manhattan Democratic zombies, there are few Obama supporters left to be found anywhere in America.

Remember that about 47 percent of Americans get entitlement checks from government. Obama is paying for their support and he still has only 38 percent approval. You know youíre unpopular when even bribes donít work anymore!

This man has managed to pull off something remarkable and historical: He has alienated almost every single American who actually works for a living and pays taxes, outside of Chicago, Manhattan, Hollywood and Detroit. He has virtually zero support among the 53 percent who arenít getting a check from government. You canít find another instance of that in the history of American politics.

Obama is amazing!

NowÖ one last bit of housekeeping. I do want to answer my critics whose only response will be: "All of these white voters who donít support Obama are racists. Itís all about race."

First of all, the very definition of racism is voting for a black candidate becauseÖ heís black. Thatís racism. The fact that 92 percent of black voters voted for Obama and 96 percent of black women voted for Obama is nothing but voting based on race.

As far as white voters abandoning Obama in droves, Iíve yet to meet one white voter who bases it on the color of Obamaís skin. We all base it on the color of his policies. The color of his policies is red ó as in communist red. We hate his policies, not the man and not the color of his skin.

We hate the record-setting $12 trillion in debt heíll have piled up by the time his second term is finished, because Obama has ruined the future of America with that debt. And heís ruined our childrenís future quality of life with that debt. We hate Obamaís big tax increases for the middle class and small business, and the fact that those tax increases havenít helped the economy or created new jobs because the money was handed to Obamaís voters and donors ó for more entitlements, more welfare, more food stamps, bailouts, stimulus and wasted failing green energy "investments."

We hate the fact that Obama has killed millions of jobs. We hate the fact that the economy is in ruins under his leadership, except for Wall Street. Of course, Wall Street goes up because Obama has directed the Fed to print trillions in fake dollars to make his biggest donors richer than they ever imagined.

We hate the fact that Obama ruined the finest healthcare system in the world, which about 80 percent of Americans were happy with in the first place. We hate the fact that he is a liar and fraud who promised "if you like your health insurance, you can keep it." Now we either donít have insurance, or our prices have been raised through the roof. He has damaged our lives beyond belief. The color of his skin has nothing to do with it. But the facts have everything to do with it.

Over the years, I hated the policies of George McGovern and Jimmy Carter. They were both white. So did that mean I hated whites? Today, I hate the policies of Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid. Does that mean I hate Italians and Mormons? I hate the policies of Hillary Clinton. Does that mean I hate women? I hate the policies of Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Shultz and Senator Chuck Schumer. Does that mean I hate Jews? Well guess what? Iím Jewish. There goes that argument.

And I hate the policies of Joe Biden. Does that mean I hate idiots? Iím just kiddingÖ kind of.

The point is in every case, itís the politics and policies that we hate ó not the person or the race. So the argument is just plain misleading, fraudulent and stupid.

It all comes down to common sense. White, middle-class Americans are suffering because of the policies of an incompetent, fraudulent, lying Marxist. And weíre not in delusion and denial, simply because weíre not blinded by the color of his skin. The fact is we donít care about the color of his skin. So we can see the plain truth.

Thatís why Obamaís poll numbers are amazing. Thatís why among Americans who are not Kool-Aid drinkers blinded by the color of his skin, Obamaís poll numbers are the lowest in history.

Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. God bless America.





Obama Is Arrogant & Egotistical: He is a President who thinks of himself as too smart, too gifted, too important and too busy to give a damn about his job, or the economy, or the American people. Those are all things only "the little people" have to do
As President Obama has played 163 rounds of golf and rarely attends vital meetings, while America is at war, while Russia threatens World War III, while the economy is in shambles, while millions of people have given up hope of ever working again, while record numbers of Americans are living in poverty, while black unemployment is double that of white, and while food stamps, welfare, disability and all entitlements soar to record levels. We have a President who thinks of himself as too smart, too gifted, too important and too busy to give a damn about his job, or the economy, or the American people. He's even too important to have to bother to check in every night. Those are all things only "the little people" have to do.


Obama Is Arrogant & Egotistical: He is a President who thinks of himself as too smart, too gifted, too important and too busy to give a damn about his job, or the economy, or the American people. Those are all things only "the little people" have to do

Obama At Columbia Story Explains Arrogant Attitude

March 20, 2014 by Wayne Allyn Root -- Personal Liberty Digest

 

Watch the video here -- http://personalliberty.com/2014/03/20/obama-at-columbia-story-explains-arrogant-attitude/ -- or read the text of it below:

Hello, I'm Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty.

I told you so.

Thirty years ago, Barack Obama, my Columbia University Class of 1983 classmate, was rarely seen. Thirty years later, he can't be bothered to attend national security meetings about a crisis that could lead to World War III.

Some things never change.

You might ask, "What do Obama's college days have to do with his Presidency today?" The answer is everything.

By college, a person's personality, attitude and behavior is usually fairly well set. That's why Obama's Columbia days tell us so much about his behavior as President today.

What do I know about Obama at Columbia? Nothing. I never met him. As I've reported countless times, I was a political science major and pre-law at Columbia from 1979-1983. Even though I thought I knew everyone in the political science department, neither I nor any of my friends at Columbia ever met or saw Obama there.

At the 30th class reunion last May, I tracked down legendary Columbia history professor and Presidential historian Henry Graff. For 46 years, all the American political leaders who attended Columbia were in Professor Graff's classes. Not Obama. Graff never met him, never saw him, never heard of him.

The problem is Obama defenders and the media (I know, they're the same) interpreted what I said wrongly. I never said Obama didn't attend Columbia. I said he was never in class. I said while it was strange only one or two students, one professor and one foreign exchange student (who was his roommate off campus) claim to have ever seen him at Columbia, they prove he most probably attended the university. I'm sure he wouldn°Įt be the first college student to rarely, if ever, attend classes. I said he was like "the ghost of Columbia."

What it means is simple. Obama is exactly the same today as he was as a student at Columbia thirty years ago: arrogant and egotistical. He's either too lazy, or he thinks he's too smart, to have to actually do the work expected of him. Nothing has changed in 30 years.

I'm sure he was rarely ever in class at Columbia because he had more important things to do. Besides, he already knew everything. Obama has always believed Obama is brilliant and better than the rest of us. What more could Columbia teach him?

It's the same today. He rarely attends important meetings. In the past two weeks, he's skipped two national security meetings focused on Russia's invasion of Ukraine, a crisis that could lead to World War III. Yet our President chose not to attend.

Do you think this is conservative propaganda or exaggeration? Hardly. Obama's absence from both national security meetings was reported by many media, including Reuters.

Why did Obama skip the first meeting? He chose to attend a White House Film Festival. Just like during his days at Columbia University, Obama had more important things to do.

Even if Obama isn't impressed by Russia's invading Ukraine, certainly he finds America's jobs crisis important, right? Wrong. Obama could find no time to meet about the sky-high unemployment in America either. Even leftist Huffington Post reported in July 2012 that Obama had not convened a meeting of his jobs council in six months.

POLITICO updated the report in January 2013: Obama never bothered to convene one meeting of his own jobs council in a full year, even with unemployment and underemployment at crisis levels.

Even more remarkable, within two weeks of that story, Obama closed down his jobs council -- with 12 million Americans still counted officially as unemployed.

With more than 92 million working-age Americans not working, and men suffering the lowest workforce participation rate since record-keeping began, Obama thought it unimportant to even continue having a jobs council.

So what was important in Obama's life? Golf and fundraisers. PolitiFact.com, the nonpartisan fact checker, confirmed our President golfed 10 times and attended 106 fundraisers during just the original six-month period when he could find no time, or interest, to attend even one meeting of his own jobs council. Can you imagine the updated numbers for the full year?

And where was he the night of the Benghazi attack? Both Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Martin Dempsey testified Obama was absent that night.

Four brave Americans died while Obama was "absent." What could be more important than a U.S. consulate under attack with American lives at stake? What could be so important that Obama never checked in to ask a question or discuss a rescue attempt from 5:30 p.m. Eastern time until the next morning (when everyone was dead)?

Just like his college days, Obama believes he's too gifted to do the actual work of President. He's just too busy to have to worry about unemployed Americans. He's just too important to have to bother to check in every night. Those are all things only "the little people" have to do.

History will show that George W. Bush, the man the leftist media painted as "arrogant, elitist and out of touch," played 29 rounds of golf as President, until quitting in August of 2003 out of respect for the troops in harm's way.

Meanwhile, Obama, "the man of the people," has played 163 rounds of golf and counting, while America is at war, while Russia threatens World War III, while the economy is in shambles, while millions of people have given up hope of ever working again, while record numbers of Americans are living in poverty, while black unemployment is double that of white and while food stamps, welfare, disability and all entitlements soar to record levels.

Nothing has changed since Columbia University -- not Obama's personality, not his attitude, not his behavior.

We have a President who thinks of himself as too smart, too gifted, too important and too busy to give a damn about his job, or the economy, or the American people -- either that or he does care. And he's not in our corner. I'll let you decide.

I'm Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. God bless America.





Treacherous Obama Is Rushing To Accelerate The Destruction Of America: Obama is no longer hiding the fact that he is a tyrant, dictator, communist and hater of America, capitalism and Judeo-Christian values
Obama is no longer hiding his plans to destroy America. Why the sudden rush for Obama to accelerate the destruction of America? His internal polls show Democrats are headed for a landslide defeat in November now that the disastrous effects of Obamacare are clear for the voters to see. Knowing Democrats can no longer get elected, or re-elected, Obama has decided to go it alone. Without regard for the law, the Constitution or the American people, he obviously has decided to do the most damage possible to America during his final 3 years. The evil and terrible news is coming in waves. And itís all coming from Obama ó a man no longer hiding the fact that he is a tyrant, dictator, communist and hater of America, capitalism and Judeo-Christian values. The question is: Who will stop him?


Treacherous Obama Is Rushing To Accelerate The Destruction Of America: Obama is no longer hiding the fact that he is a tyrant, dictator, communist and hater of America, capitalism and Judeo-Christian values

Is Obama Accelerating The Collapse Of America?

February 20, 2014 by Wayne Allyn Root  ó Personal Liberty Digest

Watch the video here ó http://personalliberty.com/2014/02/20/is-obama-accelerating-the-collapse-of-america/ ó or read the text of it below:

Hi, Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. In my latest book, The Ultimate Obama Survival Guide, released in spring 2013, I called Barack Obama a "stealth Marxist" out to destroy capitalism and make Americans dependent on government. This wasnít just guesswork. Obama and I were classmates at Columbia University, where we were taught how to overwhelm the system until the economy collapses with spending, debt and entitlements. In my book, I called Obamacare the perfect "Trojan Horse" that would make it all happen.

Have you paid attention to the Obama news of the past week? Itís amazing. Itís mind-boggling. Itís unimaginable. It was a week of unimaginable destruction.

The cloak is off. Obama is no longer hiding his plans to destroy America. For anyone who isnít blind, deaf or very dumb, itís now all out in the open.

The news of this past week proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that Obama is accelerating the destruction of America. Why the sudden rush? Obama and his Marxist cabal see the writing on the wall. Their internal polls show they are headed for a landslide defeat in November. Now that the disastrous effects of Obamacare are clear for the voters to see, they know Democrats are about to be destroyed at the polls.

Knowing Democrats can no longer get elected, or re-elected, Obama has decided to go it alone. Without regard for the law, the Constitution or the American people, he and those pulling his strings behind the scenes have obviously decided to do the most damage possible to America during his final three years. Heís finally taken off the mask and shown himself to be the true communist tyrant he is.

Look At The Facts

This week the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office finally reported the truth: Obamacare is the perfect job-killing machine. Millions of people have already been downsized from full-time to part-time work, and now we know from the CBO that an additional 2.3 million jobs will be eliminated. As I predicted from Day One, this is exactly what Obamacare was intended to do: destroy the middle class and make us all dependent on government checks to survive.

Obamaís Kool-Aid-drinking supporters are so far in the tank that when the CBO courageously pointed out that Obamacare makes it less likely millions of Americans will want to work, they called it "choice." Obamaís propagandists painted it a wonderful development. But letting middle-class wage earners and small businesses pay for all those who want to be freed from the need to work, so they can enjoy their free time and pursue their hobbies isnít "choice." Itís theft.

Folks, it is time to stop treading lightly and being politically correct. Letís call it what it is. This is communism, pure and simple. Anyone who thinks the American dream is to choose to stay home, not work and collect a government check is reading directly from Karl Marx. Anyone who thinks some people (who vote 100 percent Democrat) should have a "choice" not to work, by stealing the money of others, is reading directly from The Communist Manifesto.

Personally, I think "choice" is great. You can choose to not work anytime you want. But if you need to steal my money to do it, thatís called theft, not choice. Middle-class wage-earners are being ripped off to pay for freeloaders. That means middle-class people are having their "choices" taken away from them. I guess in Obamaís playbook one manís choice is another manís slavery.

But that was only the start of the week. Next, Obama illegally rewrote his own Obamacare law ó again. Mimicking the traits of communist dictators and tin pot tyrants, Obama obviously believes he can change any law he wants, at any given hour, of any given day. One of the main chapters of my book was titled: "America the Banana Republic." Just this week, Charles Krauthammer said whatís happening under Obama "is the stuff you do in a banana republic." Welcome to the club, Charles. Itís nice to see D.C. establishment Republicans are finally seeing the light.

In America itís a violation of the Constitution for the President to wake up on the wrong side of the bed and decide to make, arbitrarily change or break laws. This is the behavior of Fidel Castro, or the late tyrant Hugo Chavez.

But wait; it gets far worse. As part of the new illegal Obamacare directive to postpone the law for businesses with 50 to 99 employees, Obama put the Internal Revenue Service in direct control of critical U.S. business decisions. He demanded that businesses must "justify" hiring and firing decisions to the IRS to qualify for the exemption. Plain and simple, putting government in charge of the decisions of a private business is the very foundation of communism. It is how communist economies like North Korea, Cuba, the old Soviet Union and East Germany have always been run.

Still, Obama wasnít done. To show his total distain for Congress and the American people, he unilaterally loosened the rules for citizenship to allow foreigners with only a "minor" connection to terrorism to become citizens. Dennis Miller once said on "Monday Night Football," "There is no such thing as a minor groin injury." Well there is no such thing as a "minor" terrorist either.

Why is our President desperate to open the borders and let in "minor" terrorists? Itís not like we have a surplus of jobs. What is the pressing need in a country with 92 million unemployed working-age Americans? Has corporate America put out an emergency request for "minor" terrorist employees? Or is this how Obama creates instant Democratic voters?

Much along the same lines, Obamaís Attorney General Eric Holder announced this week how "unjust" it is to not allow felons to vote.

No, Mr. Attorney General, the only thing "unjust" was the crimes these felons committed. Whatís the emergency here? Is there a shortage of Democratic voters? Obamaís game plan is clearly to combine felons with radical Muslim terrorists in order to guarantee Democrat dominance for years to come.

This was just one week in America. The evil and terrible news is coming in waves. And itís all coming from one man ó a man no longer hiding the fact that he is a tyrant, dictator, communist and hater of America, capitalism and Judeo-Christian values.

Obama no longer cares to hide his radical Marxist ideology. Itís now clear itís "pedal to the metal" toward the destruction of America.

The question is: Who will stop him?





Obama And Americaís Other Black Leaders Are Race-Baiting, Guilt-Mongering, Lying Liberals
When are we there yet with the collective white guilt over the treatment of African-Americans for the past 300 years? When can we stop harping about it in everything? There really is not much hope for a deadline, especially when the sins of the father seem to stretch to perpetuity & when the non-solutions provided by some of the influential voices in black America sound a lot more like Joseph Goebbels than Mahatma Gandhi. What about blacks who are racists; is it OK for them to hate whites forever. So many race-baiting, muck-raking, money-making ways in which blacks have been let down by their self-appointed leaders & have not had to face up to their own responsibilities. Race relations are worse now than when Obama was first elected. Meanwhile, white resentment grows along with black anger. That sets the stage for race tensions & even race riots.


Obama And Americaís Other Black Leaders Are Race-Baiting, Guilt-Mongering, Lying Liberals

Americaís Black Leaders Are Race-Baiting, Guilt-Mongering, Lying Liberals

March 5, 2014 by John Meyers ó Personal Liberty Digest

Last week, President Barack Obama announced the "My Brother's Keeper" initiative.

And the LORD said unto Cain, Where is Abel your brother? And he said, I know not: Am I my brotherís keeper? ó Genesis 4:9

"Iím not my brotherís keeper," my mother used to say. She and my father survived the Great Depression. Through decades of hard work, they made themselves a comfortable life. But a higher authority than my late mother, President Barack Obama, believes we are our brotherís keeper.

Last week, Obama launched his initiative that will create opportunities for young black and Hispanic men. His explanation is that this is a way he is going to help those two minorities in an economy racked by civil discord. And his program is being hailed as the "My Brotherís Keeper" initiative. The Obama Administration will partner with foundations, nonprofit groups and businesses to equal the playing field for blacks and Hispanics.

The program should be called Big Brother because it focuses on a single leader, who happens to be black, who has decided by himself that young black and Hispanic youths are going to be given special advantages. If you are white, Native American or Asian, tough luck. In true Muslim tradition, Obama is not giving a hand up to young women of any race.

According to the President, groups have already invested $150 million into the program and will invest another $200 million over the next five years. And there is no stopping it; Obama has already signed an order to establish the My Brotherís Keeper Task Force, which will determine how to help black kids help themselves. It sounds discriminatory and self-aggrandizing for the President, who was shameless while presenting it.

"Fifty years after Dr. [Martin Luther] King [Jr.] talked about his dream for Americaís children, the stubborn fact is that the life chances for the average black or brown child in this country lags behind by almost every measure and is worse for boys and young men," said the President.

This is just the latest publicity stunt by Obama so that he can, with a wave of a wand and a few hundred million dollars, change black fortunes. Until now, he has been remiss in doing so, unless it added to his legacy.

Obamaís Sermon On The Mount

TIME reported:

Last February, Obama met with a group of young men at Hyde Park Academy on Chicagoís South Side, who were a part of the Becoming a Man program within the school. He spoke candidly with the group about his experiences, acknowledging the fact that as a man of color who was raised by a single mother, their lives were inherently similar. The only difference, he said, was the fact that he grew up in an environment that was more forgiving.

When I went to high school, I must have missed Becoming a Man Day. I got those lessons from my father when I was young enough that discipline still mattered, before age 12 and not 17. During his long business trips for his magazine, my mother was his XO, always at the ready with the big, old, sterling-silver brush. I must have gotten 30 spankings growing up, but I earned them all. More importantly, they stopped when I was 11 after I had begun to associate my bratty behavior with a sore butt.

Every good parent knows that how his kids turn out depends on how they are raised as little children ó not because of some feel-good Presidential plan set up for young men who are way too old to now learn values such as hard work, respect and personal integrity.

Furthermore, is Obama omnipotent? How does he know which environment is the most forgiving? I think black kids are taking hardly any of the blame these days, and itís being pushed on to the whites. Lately, everything is Whiteyís fault. If some white man killed some poor, innocent black kid, it will be plastered all over the TV media for months, maybe years. And on it goes the direct and indirect message that the laws are written and the police are there to protect Whitey. Therefore, Whitey is at the root of every social injustice. Americaís black leaders bang that war drum louder each day.

America could have better race relations without black leaders like Obama, Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and Oprah Winfrey forever mucking in the past and making white people feel guilty, while black people feel victimized.

Are We There Yet?

If you have children, you must have heard a thousand times on any trip, "Are we there yet?!" One of my first memories dates back to when I was 3 and I was sitting in the middle seat between my older brother and sister flying two hours from Calgary to Vancouver, Canada, to meet our parents. The last hour I wanted a minute by minute update: "Are we there yet?!"

What I want to know is when we are there yet with the collective white guilt over the treatment of African-Americans for the past 300 years? When can we stop harping about it in everything from the NFL to the Academy Awards, to the policies cooked up by the Oval Office? Can just somebody give us a date that we can put this in our past? After all, the whites who committed those crimes are either dead or soon will be. And if we cannot ever put it into our past, how were we so able to forget the genocide we did to Native Americans?

The truth is I donít hold out much hope for a deadline, especially when the sins of the father seem to stretch to perpetuity and when the non-solutions provided by some of the influential voices in black America sound a lot more like Joseph Goebbels than Mahatma Gandhi.

Just read what Winfrey had to say regarding the racism "problem" when interviewed by the BBC in November shorty before she received the Medal of Freedom from Obama:

Of course, problem is not solved. You know, as long as people can be judged by the color of their skin, the problemís not solved. As long as there are people who still ó and thereís a whole generation; I say this, you know, I said this, you know, for Apartheid South Africa; I said this for my own, you know, community in the South ó there are still generations of people, older people, who were born and bred and marinated in it, in that prejudice and racism, and they just have to die.

Sins Of The Father, You Know?

Oprah, who do you want to see die? Just old people? What about younger people whose parents may have had them "bred and marinated in it (racism)." Do they have to die, too? And who gets to decide who is a racist and who is not? What if we find out, Oprah, that you are a racist? Is it possible you hate the Swiss because they treated you shabbily in that Zurich shop when you just had to have that $38,000 handbag last summer? If so, do we have to wait for you to die before racism is gone?

And then there is the question of blacks who are racists. Is it OK for them to hate whites, given decades of discrimination and centuries of slavery, which, by the way, ended 148 years ago?

It doesnít seem productive when black leaders like the President and Winfrey make excuses about male black youths and do not hold them to the same accountability as white youths. Yet there are other black leaders just as bad as Obama and Winfrey.

Blacks are still being treated so poorly, said Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan to a crowd of 18,000 in Detroit last month, that African-Americans should have their own court system.

"Our people canít take much more. We have to have our own courts. You failed us," Farrakhan said.

"How long must we let people stand their ground, shooting us and getting away with it while we donít get justice?" added Farrakhan. "We want justice. Equal justice under the law. We want the federal government to intercede to see that black people get justice in accordance with the law. Otherwise, Iím going on record with this todayÖ we have to have our own courts."

Whatís next? Separate courts for Hispanics? How about for Asians? I am a Canadian-American. Do I get to go trot off to my own courthouse if I get in trouble?

These are all race-baiting, muck-raking, money-making ways in which blacks have been let down by their self-appointed leaders and have not had to face up to their own responsibilities. The result is that race relations are worse now than when Obama was first elected. He bears responsibility in this, but he has had plenty of help from the likes of Winfrey, Farrakhan and many others ó all of them spreading the message of irreversible shame against white America as a weapon to press their liberal agenda.

Meanwhile, white resentment grows along with black anger. That sets the stage for race tensions and even race riots. Maybe that was the intention from the start.

Yours in good times and bad,

ĖJohn Myers





An Expanded Investigation Of The Real IRS Scandal Will Lead To The Impeachment Of Obama: Obamaís IRS scandal makes Nixon look like a minor league rookie
The 2nd of Richard Nixonís Articles of Impeachment was for the crime of using the IRS to punish his political opponents. The difference is that Obamaís IRS scandal makes Nixon look like a minor league rookie. Congress needs to expand this investigation since the real scandal is that this was a widespread criminal conspiracy by the Obama White House to use the IRS to target, persecute, intimidate and silence Obamaís critics and political opposition ó good Americans with names and faces and families ó whom they tried to destroy and intimidate. Thatís why Obama doesnít want that story in the news. He wants this to be about only Tea Party groups that have been made so unpopular. But this ďIRS Targets The Tea PartyĒ story is a distraction from a much bigger and more dangerous scandal. The real scandal will lead to the impeachment of Obama.


An Expanded Investigation Of The Real IRS Scandal Will Lead To The Impeachment Of Obama: Obamaís IRS scandal makes Nixon look like a minor league rookie

I Have The Smoking Gun In The IRS Scandal

March 6, 2014 by Wayne Allyn Root ó Personal Liberty Digest

Watch the video here óhttp://personalliberty.com/2014/03/06/i-have-the-smoking-gun-in-the-irs-scandal/ó or read the text of it below

Hello, Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. Internal Revenue Service official Lois Lerner finally agreed to testify in front of Congress. (Lerner invoked her 5th amendment right and refused to testify.) Still, the media and Republicans in Congress are missing the larger picture. They keep thinking this scandal involves the nameless, faceless Tea Party groups that have been demonized by President Barack Obama and his allies. Thatís why Congress needs to expand this investigation.

The real scandal is that this was a widespread criminal conspiracy by the Obama White House to use the IRS to target, persecute, intimidate and silence Obamaís critics and political opposition.

And I believe I personally have the smoking gun to tie the Obama White House to this scandal.

Congress needs to ask Lerner and other IRS officials about the targeting of individual critics of Obama ó good Americans with names and faces and families ó whom they tried to destroy and intimidateÖ people like me. That story will resonate with the American people.

Thatís why Obama doesnít want that story in the news. He wants this to be about only Tea Party groups that are so unpopular. But this "IRS targets the Tea Party" story is a distraction from a much bigger and more dangerous scandal. The real scandal will lead to the impeachment of Obama.

The second of Richard Nixonís Articles of Impeachment was for the crime of using the IRS to punish his political opponents. Donít look now, but weíve got another Nixon in the White House. The difference is that Obamaís IRS scandal makes Nixon look like a minor league rookie.

Tea Party groups are just one part of this widespread conspiracy. I was personally targeted along with many others, including Dr. Benjamin Carson; former GOP Senate candidate Christine OíDonnell; a stage 4 terminal cancer victim (after appearing on FOX News); conservative filmmakers like Jerry Mullen (Dinesh DíSouzaís partner) and Joel Gilbert; Christian ministers like Billy Graham; Catherine Engelbrecht, who was targeted more than 15 times by the IRS and other government agencies after founding her Tea Party group; and numerous prominent GOP donors. The list goes on and on.

There is a clear pattern of a criminal conspiracy here. This was an organized crime conspiracy that would make Al Capone and the Gambino crime family proud. The only question is: Can Obama be connected? If he can, this becomes the biggest scandal in modern U.S. political history.

Let me tell you about my personal situation. I spent three years (2011-2013) under nonstop attack by the IRS. I first wrote about it last spring.

I may not be the most high-profile Obama critic in the country, but my opinions are read by millions at many of the most popular news, business and political websites in the country, like Personal Liberty. Last year, my book The Ultimate Obama Survival Guide became a national bestseller.

The result of all of this nonstop media exposure? An unprecedented IRS attack starting in January 2011. This IRS attack was so overzealous and out of bounds, I was forced to hire one of the Nationís top tax law firms. My legal team took the case to tax court, where we won a complete victory. Five days later, the IRS announced a new tax audit. Iím not a billionaire or a wheeling, dealing hedge fund CEO. Iím just a small businessman, but someone in the Obama Administration thought I needed to be silenced.

Multiple legal and tax experts confirmed they had never heard of an American taxpayer being attacked by the IRS in such a manner only five days after winning in tax court. Furthermore, they all agreed this could happen only if I was on Obamaís "enemies list."

The attack was chilling, intimidating and very expensive. It was meant to bleed me dry and teach me a lesson: If you dare to criticize Obama, get ready to lose everything.

Here is where my case may differ from others. Obama and the IRS left a trail. I may have the smoking gun to connect Obama to the scandal.

Smoking Gun No. 1

Unlike any other IRS targets, I was Obamaís classmate at Columbia University. And I never hesitated to express my theories about Obamaís scandals at Columbia. My commentaries and theories were widely covered by conservative media like Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, Mike Huckabee, Bill Cunningham and even Geraldo Rivera.

Iíll leave it for you to decide, but is it possible that my criticisms of the President hit too close to home. And as his college classmate appeared all over the media hitting him hard, he noticed. I got under his skin. And Obama or his top aides (see Valerie Jarrett or David Axelrod) ordered the IRS to make my life miserable. I think itís not only possible, I think itís probable.

Donít forget; this Obama socialist cabal plays by Chicago rules of dirty assignation politics. Also never forget they sent the IRS to attack a stage 4 terminal cancer patient who appeared once on FOX News to criticize the President. I made thousands of appearances in the media, including dozens per year at FOX News.

Regardless of how you feel about my criticisms of the President, even if you hate me and even if you think all of my opinions are wrong, a President canít order the IRS to target a citizen for his political beliefs. If either Obama or his top aides gave the orders, a crime was committed. Nixonís Articles of Impeachment make that clear.

Smoking Gun No. 2

As my second IRS attack was winding down and I was winning once again, the IRS auditor handling my case in California received a very unusual phone call. On the other end of the call was one of the most important IRS officials in the country. He called to demand the IRS auditor wrap up my case immediately.

Why was one of the top officials in the IRS interested in closing my case? Why would a top IRS official intervene in an "unimportant" local audit? How would a top IRS official even know about my case? What would make him take an interest? If he never saw the details of my case, why would he be interested in closing it as quickly as possible?

I consulted several tax experts again. They all concluded that top IRS officials never intervene in local cases unless a call is made by someone at the very top of the food chain ó either the White House or a U.S. Senator.

Interestingly, this happened two weeks before the IRS scandal broke all over the national news.

Did whoever was giving the IRS its marching orders panic and decide to bury my case before the national media started snooping around? Did someone in the White House make that call?

Smoking Gun No. 3

Since then, Judicial Watch, the leading government watchdog organization in the country, jumped on board my case. Judicial Watch agreed my case looked suspiciously like a classic case of IRS persecution and intimidation ordered by highest levels of government. It partnered with me to find out the truth, including whether the IRS trail leads directly to the Obama White House.

Judicial Watch requested all files, records, correspondence, phone calls, etc. relating to my case on Aug. 7, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act.

By law, the IRS had 30 days to comply. That was well more than half a year ago. Itís been more than half a year of silence.

The IRS is refusing to cooperate with the law of the United States of America.

Why would the IRS risk breaking the law rather than releasing my files? Something smells rotten in D.C.

Itís not difficult to find out where this trail leads. Ask any prosecutor what comes next. Squeeze the people at the bottom to give up the names at the top. Put them in front of Congress and under oath and ask: "Who gave the orders and why?" Then, move up the chain of command. Iím betting this case leads to the White House.

Oh, and be sure to ask IRS officials what about my case is so important that theyíd be willing to break the law by refusing to respond to our Freedom of Information Act request.

After all that, I donít place the blame on the IRS. Obama has used them as scapegoats. He threw the IRS under the bus. He blamed "rogue agents" out of the Cincinnati, Ohio, office. Heís lying through his teeth. My case involved the Las Vegas office of the IRS.

And there are no "rogue agents." Most government employees are good people. Career bureaucrats would never risk their pensions to harass or persecute taxpayers without orders from above.

The IRS employees who handled my appeals in California and at U.S. Tax Court were honest, fair and professional. I have nothing but good things to say about them.

The other IRS agents who tried to destroy me were undoubtedly ordered to do so. Iím sure they felt that their careers were at risk if they didnít follow orders from the top levels of government.

The buck stops with the Obama White House. It had all the power and the motive. Thatís where the criminal act occurred. I believe the Obama White House directed this widespread witch hunt ó not just of me, but of hundreds of other critics of the President and major GOP donors.

Then, when it got caught in a criminal conspiracy, it tried to distract the media with the Tea Party storyÖ and blame the little guys at the IRS. Suddenly, lower-level employees just following orders were "rogue agents." How low can you go? The IRS was used by Obama and then thrown under the bus. These agents are victims, too, of an out-of-control tyrant as President.

Watergate proved even the President isnít above the law. This IRS scandal may yet prove Obama isnít too big to jail.

Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. God bless America, a country where no one is too big to jail, not even the President.





Do Equal Rights Really Exist For The ďMajorityĒ In PC America?: Where the "majority" must tolerate and teach the beliefs of the minority or be punished and labeled bigots by the government and the media, but where the "minority" need not tolerate nor teach the beliefs of the majority and are rewarded and acclaimed heroes by the government and the media
Believe that equal rights do exist for the ďmajorityĒ in PC America? Try getting official approval for a large group to march in a major American parade bearing a prominent banner declaring Weíre Proud To Be White, Weíre Proud To Be Heterosexual, Weíre Proud To Be Males, Weíre Proud To Be Christians, Weíre Proud To Be Gun Owners, or Weíre Proud To Work For A Living. We have come full circle in this country, with the "minority" demanding ďtoleranceĒ and becoming absolutely intolerant of anyone who disagrees with them. Welcome to the new tyranny of the minority!


Do Equal Rights Really Exist For The ďMajorityĒ In PC America?: Where the "majority" must tolerate and teach the beliefs of the minority or be punished and labeled bigots by the government and the media, but where the "minority" need not tolerate nor teach the beliefs of the majority and are rewarded and acclaimed heroes by the government and the media.

The Tyranny Of The Minority

February 28, 2014 by Chip Wood ó Personal Liberty Digest

Chalk up another victory for the gay and lesbian lobby. They managed to stir up so much of a ruckus that Arizona Governor Jan Brewer vetoed a measure the State Legislature passed to safeguard the religious liberty of its citizens.

Senate Bill 1062 was designed to protect Christian business owners from being forced to provide goods or services when to do so would violate their religious beliefs. Such a measure became necessary, its supporters said, because Christian photographers, bakers and florists had been punished for declining to provide services for gay weddings.

State Senator Steve Yarborough, one of the sponsors of the bill, said: "This bill is not about allowing discrimination. This bill is about preventing discrimination against people who are clearly living out their faith."

In cases in Oregon, Washington and New Mexico, business owners were found guilty of violating the civil rights of gays for refusing to provide their services for a gay wedding. In some cases, they were fined thousands of dollars for discriminating against gay customers.

And it isnít just private businesses that are under the gun of the homosexual lobby. So are many public charities. Catholic Charities came under attack when it said it would not violate the teachings of its faith by placing children in the homes of same-sex couples. When it was ordered to do so, it chose instead to shut down its foster care and adoption services in several States. When the charity closed its doors in Illinois, Bishop Thomas Paprocki said, "In the name of tolerance, weíre not being tolerated."

Indeed, that is precisely what increasingly is happening all across this county.

Once the State Legislature in Arizona passed SB 1062, the floodgates opened against Governor Jan Brewer, demanding that she veto the bill. John McCain and Jeff Flake, the two Arizona Senators, denounced the measure. So did Mitt Romney, the 2012 Republican nominee for President. Newt Gingrich, another prominent Republican politician, said the same thing.

Three Republican legislators in Arizona who had voted for the measure said they had changed their minds. In a letter to the Governor, they said that their intent had been "to create a shield for all citizensí religious liberties." Instead, they noted, "[T]he bill has been mischaracterized by its opponents as a sword for religious intolerance."

Many businesses, including Apple and American Airlines, joined the chorus urging Brewer to veto the measure. Even the National Football League got involved, threatening to move the 2015 Super Bowl from Phoenix to some other, more gay-friendly State unless she vetoed the bill.

Faced with all of these strident demands, it isnít surprising that Brewer buckled. Very few politicians could have withstood the pressure she faced.

In announcing her decision, the Governor said, "My agenda is to sign into law legislation that advances Arizona." While she believes strongly that "religious liberty is a core American and Arizona value," she added, "So is non-discrimination."

Here is how she explained her decision to veto: "To the supporters of the legislation, I want you to know that I understand the long-held norms about marriage and family that are being challenged as never before." She recognized that "Our society is undergoing many dramatic changes."

But then she added, "However, I sincerely believe that Senate Bill 1062 has the potential to create more problems than it purports to solve. It could divide Arizona in ways we cannot even imagine and no one would ever want."

Demonstrators outside the State capitol building in Phoenix erupted in cheers when Brewerís decision was announced.

We have come full circle in this country, with the people demanding "tolerance" becoming absolutely intolerant of anyone who disagrees with them. If, because of your religious convictions, you decline to participate in a gay wedding, itís not enough to insist you violate your conscience. No, these new forces of intolerance say you must be punished.

Welcome to the new tyranny of the minority.

Until next time, keep some powder dry.

ĖChip Wood





Obama, The Media, Congress, John Boehner, The Establishment GOP And The Debt Ceiling Itself Are Full Of Crap: If we donít act fast, they will all soon flush America and the American dream forever down the crapper
Have you ever had a sewage pipe break? If the raw sewage kept pouring out and piling up to your ceiling, would you hire contractors to raise your ceiling or would you ask them to correct the problem: to fix the broken pipe and clean the piles of crap out of your home? Raising the ceiling of your home would be incredibly stupid; it would cost hundreds of thousands of dollars. It would change the entire construction of your home. Most importantly, it wouldnít solve your problem. If you raised the ceiling but didnít fix the broken pipe, youíd spend $100,000 on the higher ceiling. But two weeks later, theyíd have to raise it again. They would have to raise it again and again, until youíd spent more than $1 million on ceiling raises on a $100,000 home that is†still†full of crap.


Obama, The Media, Congress, John Boehner, The Establishment GOP And The Debt Ceiling Itself Are Full Of Crap: If we donít act fast, they will all soon flush America and the American dream forever down the crapper

Obama And The Debt Ceiling Are Both Full Of Crap

February 13, 2014 by Wayne Allyn Root ó Personal Liberty Digest 

Watch the video here ó http://personalliberty.com/2014/02/13/obama-and-the-debt-ceiling-are-both-full-of-crap/ ó or read the text of it below:

Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. The debt ceiling debate is upon us again. And once again you are being fed a line of crap. Barack Obama is full of crap. The media are full of crap. Congress is full of crap. John Boehner and the establishment GOP are full of crap. And the debt ceiling itself is one big load of crap. Itís all a big lie. Let me explain in simple terms anyone can understand.

Have you ever had a sewage pipe break? If the raw sewage kept pouring out and piling up to your ceiling, would you hire contractors to raise your ceiling or would you ask them to correct the problem: to fix the broken pipe and clean the piles of crap out of your home?

Raising the ceiling of your home would be incredibly stupid; it would cost hundreds of thousands of dollars. It would change the entire construction of your home. Most importantly, it wouldnít solve your problem. If you raised the ceiling but didnít fix the broken pipe, youíd spend $100,000 on the higher ceiling. But two weeks later, theyíd have to raise it again. They would have to raise it again and again, until youíd spent more than $1 million on ceiling raises on a $100,000 home that is still full of crap.

Right now, Iím sad to say, America is full of crap.

The Republican chief coward, House Speaker John Boehner, just gave in to Obama again (as he always does) and got nothing in return (as he always does). Itís as if this debate is actually a choreographed acting performance. The loser is America. Youíve been fed a load of crap.

Theyíre all lying to you, trying to distract you from the truth. The issue isnít the debt ceiling. Thatís only the result. The actual problem is out-of-control government spending. In only five years, Obama has added $6.6 trillion to the national debt. Debt is like sewage. It is bad stuff. It carries disease. It stinks. Itís a cancer or a curse upon whoever touches it.

Hereís what this so-called debt ceiling fight is about. Government has a sewage leak. Raising the ceiling is a big mistake, because no one is fixing the problem. The problem is stopping the raw sewage before it spreads fatal disease and causes a catastrophic epidemic that brings about an economic collapse. Debt has already destroyed the so-called PIIGS of Europe: countries like Greece, Italy, Spain and Portugal. They are drowning in debt. By raising our debt ceiling, we are making the exact same mistake, heading in the exact same direction. We are Greece, except much bigger. Debt will destroy us too, but our collapse will take the entire world down with us. The debt ceiling is a ticking time bomb. Each time we raise the debt ceiling, we are closer to the implosion.

Raising the ceiling again proves that Obama is a failure. It proves that Obama is reckless and irresponsible. It proves that Obama is spending us into bankruptcy. It proves that Obama is once again (what a surprise) a liar. He claims to have cut spending. But the fact we are at the debt ceiling again proves we raised spending. It proves that even the infamous "sequester," which Obama claimed cut too much spending, actually never cut enough. If we actually cut any substantial spending, why would we need to raise the debt ceiling? Obama and the media donít want you to ask that question. They need to distract you.

No one cut spending. If anyone had actually cut spending, then why are we out of money again? The politicians called a cut in the increase in spending "a cut in spending." But itís not actually a cut in anything. Itís just more spending.

Or in this analogy of a house with a broken sewer pipe, itís just more sewage. What if your plumber allowed 50 percent more sewage to pour out of the pipe into your house, but he told you thatís better than 100 percent more sewage? What if he bragged that heíd slowed the sewage leak into your house? Would that work? Or would your home still be destroyed by sewage ó just a little slower. Would you want to sleep in a bedroom covered in 2 feet of raw sewage, instead of 4 feet? Would you sleep soundly? Of course not, because that didnít solve the problem.

Thatís what is happening to America. We are overloaded with crap. And our ceiling is going to soon explode and take the economy ó and your job ó with it. The very act of raising the debt ceiling means youíre spending and printing too much money. Youíre in debt. And in a matter of months, youíll need to raise the roof again.

The politicians tell us about all the threats to our country if we donít raise the ceiling. But the reality is the ultimate national security threat is out-of-control debt. Raising the ceiling doesnít solve the problem; it allows the problem to get worse. It encourages more spending. It delays the inevitable: a massive debt crisis that causes the collapse of America.

Obama, his socialist cabal, big-government proponents and the media (I know I repeat myself) all have a vested interest in lying to you. They desperately need the reckless spending to continue to bribe their voters. Thatís how they stay in office, by perpetuating a massive Ponzi scheme. They desperately need more fake money printing to keep the Ponzi scheme going. They desperately need to distract you from seeing the truth: that government spending is the problem, and the way to solve the problem isnít raising the ceiling; itís fixing the pipe.

How do we fix the pipe? We slow the spending. We cut government. We actually ó get ready for this ó must spend less than we take in. No one in the hysterical media has ever mentioned this simple, alternative solution.

Raising the ceiling is one way to go; fixing the pipe is the other. Which one would you go with in your own home?

Yes, folks, the debt ceiling is a pile of crap. And so is the entire Obama agenda. And if we donít act fast, so is the American dream.

Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. God bless us and save us from the communists, socialists, liars, con men and idiots running America into the ground.





PC America: Where unfair is fair, immoral is moral, dumbed-down is educated, dictatorial is democratic, male is female, female is male, un-Christian is Christian, un-biased criticism of non-whites by whites is racism, bigotry by non-whites is not bigotry, homosexuality indoctrination is not indoctrination, and the minority is the majority
Companies are forced to hire unqualified people & ignore highly qualified people who have lighter skin. Boys are told that they are stunted for acting out their natural male impulses & girls are told that true femininity is weakness & that they should act more masculine. Young adults who are coddled & infantilized, young girls who think promiscuity is the key to womanhood & motherhood is disgusting, & young men who have no testicular fortitude with no clue how to take charge of their own lives. The American family unit has been destroyed with women who are ashamed to set aside careers to raise children & with men who abandon their children. And a weak-


PC America: Where unfair is fair, immoral is moral, dumbed-down is educated, dictatorial is democratic, male is female, female is male, un-Christian is Christian, un-biased criticism of non-whites by whites is racism, bigotry by non-whites is not bigotry, homosexuality indoctrination is not indoctrination, and the minority is the majority

The Twisted Motives Behind Political Correctness

February 18, 2014 by Brandon Smith óPersonal Liberty Digest

As I have confessed in the past, in my early years I found myself active in the Democratic Party and the general liberal methodology. I had no understanding of the concept of the false left/right paradigm. I had no inkling of the dangers of globalism and central banking. I had no concept of decentralization or non-participation. I had never even heard of libertarianism. I knew only that George W. Bush was a criminal (and I was right), but the problem went far deeper than the GOP. I was astoundingly ignorant of the bigger picture.

However, what I did have going for me was an almost violent sense of nonconformity. I hated collectivists, yet I found myself surrounded by them while working within the leftist culture. It was the insanity of self-proclaimed "liberals" that taught me the true nature of the facade of politics. When I realized that the Democrats were essentially the same corrupt entity as the neoconservatives, everything in my life changed.

One aspect of liberalism with which I am now very familiar is political correctness. I didnít understand it at the time, not until I stepped outside the cultism of it and looked in from a wiser place. It always bothered me, but I couldnít quite grasp why until later. Then, it hit me like a revelation. Political correctness was not a political ideology. No, it was a religion, a full-fledged spiritual con, a New Age ghetto of frothing mishmash that is sociological voodoo. And the leftists were eating it up like steak night at an all-you-can-eat buffet.

These people were rationally retarded. Every idea they proposed they merely parroted from books and articles they had read. They were like malfunctioning automatons trapped in a cycle of discontented social criticism. Their desperation to invent meaning in the midst of their irrelevant lives made me feel ill. If they could not find a legitimate cause to champion, they would create one out of thin air and defend it relentlessly, regardless of how shallow it truly was.

When I outline my analysis of economic destabilization within the United States or I write about the rise of the police state, I am driven by a fundamental sense of concrete concern. There are indeed real problems in the world, swirling in a storm of obvious factual conflicts. But the warriors of the PC culture donít see any of it. Rather, they fantasize about injustices that donít exist, trespasses that are ultimately fictional. They imagine themselves champions of some greater purpose that, in the end, doesnít matter.

Recently, I read a news story about a "transgendered teen" in Maine. When the boy was in the fifth grade, he decided to dress as a girl and demanded to use the girlís bathroom at his public school, despite having the biological apparatus of a male. This story was international news, folks! Why? I canít say, except that the mainstream media have made a point to focus on "gender optional" issues as if they represent some kind of civil rights uprising.

The issue perfectly illustrates the disturbing nature of politically correct culture.

Teachers at the school did not deny the student the use of restroom facilities. In fact, they allowed him to use the teacherís bathrooms to avoid any confusion. The Maine Supreme Judicial Court, on the other hand, had other ideas. It ruled that the schoolís refusal to allow the boy to use the girlís facilities constituted a violation of the Stateís anti-discrimination law. The ruling has been heralded as a massive victory for the politically correct narrative.

Now, let me make one thing clear: I could not care less about this boyís sexual orientation (if he even has one). I do think the very idea that a fifth-grader at about the age of 10 is sexually conscious enough to develop a sense of gender dissuasion is absurd. Children who havenít even experienced puberty yet, proclaiming they are transgendered? Utter nonsense. I find it far more likely that the studentís PC-obsessed parents influenced him to come to such a decision despite his naivety.

That said, a personís sexual proclivities are not my concern. In fact, I have no interest whatsoever in the infatuations of any individual. That is a personal matter. I do not judge such people on their attractions. I do, though, judge people on how they handle their infatuations. What happens when someone wears his sexuality on his shoulder like a fashion accessory? Why is that even necessary? Is it not rather mentally backward for any person to base his public persona solely on his carnal compulsions? Do I dance around on the sidewalk bellowing to strangers how much I love the curves of women? Do I require a sociopolitical legal apparatus to vindicate my existence? Do I feel the need to shame gay people into publicly embracing my straight manís libido? No, I do not.

The PC culture demands that we, as individuals, openly accept the sexual orientations of anyone and everyone; otherwise, we are labeled prejudiced monsters. It is not enough that we object in a logical manner. No, we must fall to our knees and thank the stars for the very existence of gender chameleons.

In the end, the psychological gender position of any particular person does not overrule his biological features. A child with a penis is a boy. Period. He will never be a girl. Ever. Not without surgical aid. And even then, he will never have the ability to give birth, which is the very hallmark of femininity. (Sorry, feminists, but thatís how it goes.) A boy, no matter his mental orientation, does not belong in a girlís lavatory. The privacy rights of the girls outweigh the gender confusion of the boy. If I were a girl (why not play some gender games since everyone else is), I would beat the living hell out of any boy gallivanting in a dress in a bathroom I was using and make sure he never dared come back. And, by extension, if I were a rather mischievous boy with an aptitude as a peeping tom, why not dress up in a tutu in the hopes of getting a glimpse of the forbidden while being legally protected by the State?

The warped conflicts that arise, though, are not the creation of the child in question. A fifth-grader has no concept of gender rights or political correctness. This issue was a creation of the PC cult and its acolytes. These people donít actually care about the children they involve in their legal dramas. They exploit them, with every intent to abandon them once they have chiseled their agenda into the gray matter of every American.

What truly motivates these people? Why do they do what they do? I think my experience with leftists makes me a well-positioned observer of the psychology of the culture. Here are the hidden thought processes I have witnessed while dealing directly with the PC army.

PC Elitism

One of the unfortunate side effects of religion is that proponents often use it as a means to feel superior to others. I have seen it in Christianity as much as I have seen it in any other belief system. It is the primary reason why I refuse to subscribe to organized and establishment-sanctioned spiritualism. Religion should be a personal experience first and foremost, not an easy way to fit in with the collective. Communing with others who share oneís beliefs should be secondary. Hypocritically, politically correct adherents often criticize Christians for their collectivist elitism while suffering from the same problem themselves.

PC culture allows participants to pretend as though they have some greater understanding of the world, an elevated knowledge of life that makes them superior to the uninitiated. It is important to understand that when a person pursues the methodology of zealotry, he doesnít do it to make the world a better place; he does it to feel better about his place in the world.

The politically correct are so violent in the assertion of their ideals because they crave the subjugation of the mainstream and a recognition of their "rightness." They donít want people to "accept" their beliefs as tolerable. They want people to adore their beliefs as supreme. They want every man, woman and child to reinforce their ideals without question.

The malfunction of this philosophy is that zealots are never satisfied. They must always find new ways to feel superior to others. So they continuously engineer new taboos and new sins, no matter how ridiculous, so that they can forever look down upon the laymen. Because of this, there will never be an end to PC law. It will go on forever, labeling numerous social interactions and stances as "aberrant" ó never satiated and never satisfied.

PC Futurism

The young are always searching for ways to feel wiser than the old. This is just the natural way of things, at least in America. Now, I know from ample experience that age does not necessarily denote intelligence. Iíve met plenty of idiotic people who had decades of time to learn from their mistakes but didnít. But the young, many of whom lack time and struggle, have a terrible tendency to either pretend that they have "seen it all." Or they pretend that the very atmosphere of the day somehow gives them a greater insight than generations past. The reality is that most of them know very little of import. This attitude comes from a philosophy called "futurism" (popular with the Nazis and the Soviets), which holds that all the beliefs and discoveries of the past mean nothing compared to the beliefs and discoveries of the present. This ideology is alluring to the young, because it gives them a way to feel intellectually dominant over older and more "ignorant" people who are "behind the times."

Political correctness is basically an appendage of futurism. By labeling elders as social bigots and products of a barbaric era who donít understand the "lingo" of the PC elite, liberalism draws in and collectivizes the fledgling left. Younger generations are given a cultural avenue toward high priesthood, a right of passage usually reserved for the aged. They get to skip ahead past all the trials and tribulations of life and announce their deep awareness of the so-called greater good.

The values of forefathers past become archaic scrawlings of racist and prejudiced cavemen who could never appreciate the "brilliance" of todayís academia. The inherent freedoms of natural law that have existed since time began are nothing more than obstacles to them, standing in the way of a new and better world where they have somehow outsmarted human instinct and centuries of history.

PC Collectivism

The very foundation of political correctness is solidified in a desire for the perpetual reinforcement of oneís worldview. PC people need every other person around them to sing the praises of their pure virtues. If I happen to disagree with the idea of gender bending, for instance, as some kind of socially persecuted subculture that needs overt government protection, then I am, of course, labeled a hateful Neanderthal. If I stand in opposition to the concept of victim group status in general, in which the state demands that designated "minorities" be given special treatment regardless of the status of the individual, then I become a racist political fossil ignorant of the bigger picture. You see, if you disagree with PC culture in any way (even if that way is rational), you cannot win. To refute political correctness is to refute the god of the New Age; and to refute their god, even with concrete logic, is blasphemy.

This kind of blind faith in political correctness lends itself entirely to collectivism. The average person begins to think that without a viable appreciation of the philosophy, he may be left out or cast aside. Most people do not know how to function without the approval of others. Therefore, even if a father happens to have a healthy skepticism over the idea of a make-up wearing fifth-grade boy waltzing into his daughterís school bathroom, he is likely to keep his mouth shut, because to speak out would be a risk to his position within the group, or the community.

PC Control

The prevalence of PC philosophy is not subtle. I have always found it interesting that political correctness seems to consistently support the demands of the state. Our system smothers children with it in public school, our workplaces are rife with the propaganda for fear of lawsuits and colleges are veritable breeding grounds for the PC oligarchy. Politically correct culture goes out of its way to constantly test others to make sure they are also true believers.

The truth is some discrimination is healthy, and some discord is needed for a society to remain balanced. As long as we donít allow our disagreements to end in the physical harm of others, then those disagreements are our natural-born right. If you are a racist (this goes for non-whites as well), thatís fine. Just donít act out your racism in a violent way around me, or I will have to put you down permanently. If you have a distaste of homosexuality (or asexuality, as seems popular nowadays), then whatever, I donít care. You shouldnít have to have organizations like GLAAD (formerly the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation) in your face attempting to force you to put on a smile for gaydom, coordinate man-on-man heavy-petting protests in your favorite restaurant (Chick-fil-A) while youíre trying to eat a damn sandwich, push boys into the girlís bathroom, or trying to shut down your favorite TV shows because the stars happen to share your views ("Duck Dynasty").

Now, PC proponents will argue that the very existence of bigotry does harm to society as a whole, and it must be educated out of individuals. Frankly, I see that kind of utopian fascism as a far greater threat to society as a whole than bigotry ever will be.

Look at where we are today because of the PC nightmare! We have a Nation on the verge of industrial and economic collapse, partly because companies are forced by law or persuaded by government subsidies to hire people with victim group status, even if they are unqualified, while ignoring highly qualified people who just happen to have lighter skin. We have children not even old enough to discover their own inherent character being clinically diagnosed with "gender dysphoria" by a psychiatric community of quacks, which conjured most PC terminology out of thin air. We have boys who are told that they are stunted for acting out their natural male impulses and girls who are told that true femininity is weakness and that they should act more masculine. We have a mainstream culture that coddles and infantilizes young adults, young girls who think promiscuity is the key to womanhood and that motherhood is disgusting (which I find rather ironic), and young men who have no testicular fortitude and no clue how to take charge of their own lives.

The American family unit has been completely destroyed. We have women who are ashamed to set aside careers to raise children because feminism frowns upon "breeders" who bring down the whole gender. We have men who abandon their children and refuse to take responsibility. And we have a weak-minded population addicted to collective affirmation and unwilling to think outside the box for fear of being shunned and shamed. Honestly, I canít see a single redeeming quality to political correctness other than the fact that those people who espouse it do so loudly and obnoxiously, making it easier for me to identify and avoid them or to take special note of them as an obvious zombie threat in an America swiftly declining into mundane oblivion.

ĖBrandon Smith





Obamacare Is A ďPoverty TrapĒ: For millions of Americans it will make unemployment and government welfare more attractive than working
Obamacare will make unemployment more attractive than working for more than 2.3 million Americans in coming years given the new taxes and other incentives they will face and the financial benefits some will receive. For some the incentive to not climb the economic ladder will be especially strong, as earning just $1 more than 400% of the Federal poverty line could drive their insurance costs up by as much as $20,000 a year. Individuals earning less than 400% of the Federal poverty line are eligible for healthcare premium subsidies, but those subsidies taper dramatically if earnings rise above that threshold. People whose income exceeds 400% of the FPL are ineligible for premium subsidies, and for some people those subsidies will drop abruptly to zero when income crosses that threshold.


Obamacare Is A ďPoverty TrapĒ: For millions of Americans it will make unemployment and government welfare more attractive than working

Poverty Trap Or Job-Lock: Obamacare Will Be Costly For Those Ineligible For Subsidies

February 7, 2014 by Sam Rolley -- Personal Liberty Digest  

The Congressional Budget Office revealed this week that Obamacare is expected to make unemployment more attractive than working for more than 2.3 million Americans in coming years. For some Americans the incentive to not climb the economic ladder will be especially strong, as earning just $1 more than 400 percent of the Federal poverty line could drive their insurance costs up by as much as $20,000 a year.

The nonpartisan budget watchdog reported that Obamacare "will raise effective tax rates on earnings from labor," while also creating incentive for some Americans to sign up for government benefits instead of seeking employment.

"CBO estimates that the ACA will reduce the total number of hours worked, on net, by about 1.5 to 2 percent during the period from 2017 to 2024, almost entirely because workers will choose to supply less labor ó given the new taxes and other incentives they will face and the financial benefits some will receive," CBO analysts said in their economic outlook.

The CBO noted in its report that individuals earning less than 400 percent of the Federal poverty line are eligible for healthcare premium subsidies, but those subsidies taper dramatically if earnings rise above that threshold: "People whose income exceeds 400 percent of the FPL are ineligible for premium subsidies, and for some people those subsidies will drop abruptly to zero when income crosses that threshold."

A recent analysis by The Weekly Standard explored one extreme example of how Obamacare could disincentive gainful employment when subsidies disappear:

Take the case of a couple of 55-year-olds living in St. Croix County, Wisconsin, where the median household income is a little over $68,000.

Letís say that they earn $62,040 in 2014. They would pay $211 per month for the cheapest Obamacare plan available on healthcare.gov. Ö

But if they earn $62,041Ėjust one dollar moreĖthey would pay $1,342 per month. Thatís an extra $13,572 per year for the same bare-bones insurance plan. Ö

The cost of crossing the threshold of subsidy eligibility will vary based on age. For a couple in their 30s, according to healthcare.gov, it might only cost you a little over $4,000. For a couple of 64-year-olds, who are a year away from qualifying for Medicare, falling over the subsidy cliff could cost more than $20,000.

The CBOís most recent Obama revelations are expected to take center stage in the run-up to the 2014 midterm elections.

Republicans like House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan said the CBO report shows that Obamacare is a "poverty trap."

"I guess I understand Ďbetter offí in the context of healthcare. But Ďbetter offí in inducing a person not to work who is on the low-income scale, not to get on the ladder of life, to begin working, getting the dignity of work, getting more opportunities, rising their income, joining the middle class, this means fewer people will do that," he said during a Wednesday hearing.

Meanwhile, Congressional Democrats have championed the report, saying that it will eliminate so-called job-lock and give Americans the freedom to follow their dreams.

**Comment on the last paragraph: Either following their dreams or just sitting on their butts, it is going to be paid for by hard-working taxpayers who get rewarded for doing something rather than doing nothing.





Obamaís Delusional And Fraudulent State of The Union Speech Was Disgusting, Embarrassing, Plagiarized and Overflowing With Lies
The biggest outrage of the night was Obamaís getting a standing ovation from Democrats for promising to violate the Constitution; ignore checks & balances; and bypass the people, Congress & the law of the land to pass radical & extreme parts of his agenda by executive orders. Some of the facts that Obamaís nonstop lies and fraud ignored: food stamp rolls are growing 75 times faster than the job rolls; the number of working-age Americans without a job has increased by 10 million under Obama; inflation is running rampant; gas bills have doubled; electricity is at all-time highs; Obamacare causes people to lose their policies, doctors & lifesaving drugs, or to have their insurance cost doubled or tripled; military vetsí pensions are being cut; green energy bankrupted Spain; and Obamaís critics are either persecuted, intimidated or indicted.


Obamaís Delusional And Fraudulent State of The Union Speech Was Disgusting, Embarrassing, Plagiarized and Overflowing With Lies

Obamaís State Of The Union: Lies And Theft

January 30, 2014 by Wayne Allyn Root  

Watch the video here ó http://personalliberty.com/2014/01/30/obamas-state-of-the-union-lies-and-theft/ ó or read the text of it below:

Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. My, how the mighty have fallen. I was going to report on all the lies in Barack Obamaís State of the Union speech. But it appears heís more than a pathetic liar; heís actually a thief, too. Obama started out his career at the Brandenburg Gate in Germany with thousands watching. Now, he plagiarizes George W. Bushís speeches? Thatís a pretty long fall.

Large swaths of this speech appear to have been lifted directly from Bushís 2007 State of the Union. So says Bushís speechwriter ó and he should know his own words.

Now from plagiarism, we move to the original lies of Obama. The question is: Does he believe this stuff? Obama actually reported the U.S. economy is in "recovery." Bernie Madoff has nothing on this guy. In Obamaís economy the food stamp rolls are growing 75 times faster than the job rolls!

Obama said there are 8 million new jobs. Maybe heís counting people who have stopped looking for work forever, as "getting a job."

I have news for you, Mr. President: They didnít get a job. They went on disability, food stamps or welfareÖ probably all three. There are almost 100 million working-age Americans not working. Thatís almost exactly how many Americans are on entitlements. Coincidence?

Obama said the unemployment is the lowest in five years. Another whopper. The fact is the number of working-age Americans without a job has increased by almost 10 million in Obamaís first five years as President. That means each and every year of Obamaís Presidency, 2 million more Americans just disappear from the workforce. Thatís a neat trick. Iím sure David Copperfield is impressed.

Obama says every business owner should give a big raise to our employees. With what? The economy is in free-fall. Business is dramatically down for every business owner I know. We canít make payroll. We can no longer afford health insurance. Inflation is running rampant. Our gas bills have doubled. Electricity is at all-time highs.

Because of you, Mr. President, our health insurance bills have doubled or tripled.

And he wants us to give our employees a raise? Weíre lucky if we can keep the doors open.

Obama introduced some pizza parlor owner who gave his employees a raise.

I donít know where you found him. Perhaps heís an actor you rented for the day. But I know a pizza parlor owner, too. His four sons work for him. He paid $800 per month for health insurance for his family until Obamacare came along. His new bill? $2,400 per month. Heís dropping all his insurance. I guess he didnít make the cut to be introduced at the State of the Union.

Of course, your Obamacare law helped a few people that you introduced in the audience. It wasnít easy finding them, was it? But for each person your healthcare law has helped, thousands have been hurt or ruined. Theyíve lost their policies, doctors, lifesaving drugs, or had their cost raised to unaffordable levels, or had their deductibles raised dramatically. It wouldnít have been hard to find one of those victims. Senator Tom Coburn was sitting in the audience. He has cancer. He just lost his doctor because of Obamacare.

You said you "saved" the auto industry. Another whopper. You stole tens of billions of taxpayer dollars to save auto union pensions. It was pure theft. Anyone could "save" any industry by stealing billions of dollars from taxpayers and handing the money to your biggest campaign donors.

Obama said he is ordering Treasury to create some new savings bond IRA for working-class people. Great. Where will they get the money? Will they cash in their food stamps for the savings? Even if working class Americans did have any extra money, this is just a new scheme to steal their retirement money. Now instead of throwing your Social Security money away to a program going broke, working people can give the government even more retirement money to steal. Obama will "borrow" it to pay more food stamps and welfare bills and leave you with another worthless IOU.

Obama said that the National Security Agency is not violating the privacy of ordinary Americans. Of course not, the NSA is only violating the rights of Republicans and leading critics of the President. The rest of you can go about your business.

Obama says we support Ukrainian citizensí fight for free speech. Unfortunately, he doesnít support Dinesh DíSouzaís right to free speech here in America. Heís the conservative filmmaker who created the documentary "2016: Obamaís America." He was just indicted.

In Obamaís America, critics are either persecuted, intimidated or indicted.

But perhaps the biggest lie of all was Obamaís crooning about solar power. Spain is the green energy capital of Europe. Their whole economy is based on green energy. The result is more than 27 percent unemployment and more than 56 percent youth unemployment. I canít wait to replicate the Spanish economy!

Finally, Obama ended with a sweet tribute to an injured war vet. Obama loves and honors our vets while he purges the military of any officer who disagrees with him. And he cuts pensions for military vets so he can spend more on food stamps, disability, welfare and, of course, give a billion dollars to foreign companies to build and fix the defective Obamacare website.

But the highlight of the night was Obamaís getting a standing ovation from Democrats for promising to violate the Constitution; ignore checks and balances; and bypass the people, Congress and the law of the land to pass radical and extreme parts of his agenda by executive orders. Save that video of Democrats cheering wildly for Obama to break the law; it will make for one heck of a GOP television advertising campaign this fall. Iíd be sure to show them cheering in slow motion.

This, folks, is the state of our unionÖ and the state of delusion and deception in Obamaís America. Disgusting. Embarrassing. Misleading. Criminal. And even a little plagiarism thrown in for good measure.

I guess outside of the nonstop lies and fraud, Obama just didnít have any original material.

Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. Same time, same place. God bless America.





Racial Divider Obama Thinks Weíre Stupid Enough To Believe That His Approval Rating Has Hit A Record Low Because Of His Skin Color
Think about it. What if Obama had been white? Do you think thereís any chance that an obscure white politician from Illinois would have been elected President? If Obama had been white, do you believe the media would have ignored his very dubious associations or his lack of any real accomplishments? Do you think he would have been given a pass on such mysteries as the grades he got in college or why he canít produce an authentic birth certificate? No, Obamaís skin color has nothing to do with his plunging popularity. On the contrary, Obama was elected President precisely because he was black. Had voters known about his far-left policies and what he actually believed, thereís not a chance he would have been elected. Only because he was able to hide his Marxist associations and his far-left agenda is he sitting in the White House today.


Racial Divider Obama Thinks Weíre Stupid Enough To Believe That His Approval Rating Has Hit A Record Low Because Of His Skin Color

Conservative? You Must Be Racist, Extremist

January 24, 2014 by Chip Wood  

Why has Barack Obamaís popularity come crashing down? In a recent Gallup poll, the Presidentís approval rating hit a record low ó below anything that either George W. Bush or his father experienced. The only President in modern times to get a lower rating was Richard Nixon, shortly before he resigned.

Why such abysmal ratings? Do you think it might have anything to do with the far-left policies Obama has pursued? His disastrous healthcare program? The National Security Agency spying scandal? Or maybe the use of the Internal Revenue Service to intimidate conservatives?

No, according to the man himself, none of those are the reason why his approval ratings have plummeted. When asked by New Yorker editor David Remnick to explain his dismal approval, Obama reached into his bag of tricks and played the race card again:

"Thereís no doubt that thereís some folks who just really dislike me because they donít like the idea of a black President," Obama said.

Well, sure, in a country of more than 300 million people, no doubt there are some people who are prejudiced. Just ask any Muslim you know. But the truth is Obamaís color isnít the reason his popularity has plummeted. On the contrary, itís the reason he was elected President in the first place, to which Obama alluded in the New Yorker article:

"Now, the flip side of it is there are some black folks and maybe some white folks who really like me and give me the benefit of the doubt precisely because Iím a black President."

Think about it. What if Obama had been white? Do you think thereís any chance that an obscure white politician from Illinois who hadnít even completed a single, undistinguished term in the Senate would have been elected President? Heck, if Obama had been white, do you really believe he would have defeated Hillary Clinton for the Democratic nomination?

Not a chance.

If Obama had been white, do you believe the media would have ignored his very dubious associations or his lack of any real accomplishments as a U.S. Senator, an Illinois State Senator or a community organizer? Do you he would have been given a pass on such mysteries as the grades he got in college or why he canít produce an authentic birth certificate?

No, Obamaís skin color has nothing to do with his plunging popularity. On the contrary, Obama was elected President in 2008 precisely because he was black, not in spite of it. He won because there was a vast reservoir of good will in this country toward him from whites who genuinely wanted him to succeed.

Had they known what he actually believed and the kind of far-left policies he would try to implement, thereís not a chance he would have been elected. It was precisely because he was able to hide his Marxist associations and his far-left agenda that he is sitting in the White House today.

Despite the fact that a majority of Americans say heís taking the country in the wrong direction, Obama says he is more determined than ever to implement his radical agenda. And if he canít get Congress to pass the legislation he wants, then heíll do it without their approval.

He said so himself. As he convened his first cabinet meeting of the new year, Obama said: "Weíre not just going to be waiting for legislation in order to make sure that weíre providing Americans the kind of help they need. Iíve got a pen and Iíve got a phone."

He then rattled off a long list of issues that he says Federal bureaucrats will begin implementing, regardless of what Congress does.

For a man who once taught Constitutional law, Obama sure doesnít think much of the system our Founding Fathers created. Forget about checks and balances between three branches of government. Creating the laws under which we must live is supposed to be the responsibility of the legislative branch, the Senate and the House of Representatives. Obamaís job, as the head of the executive branch, is to implement the laws Congress passes.

Of course, Obama knows that is how the system is supposed to work. He just doesnít like it. He doesnít want to be bound down by the chains of a Constitution.

And he isnít. Last year, for every law that Congress approved, the executive branch created hundreds of new rules and regulations. In 2013, the Federal Register, where such new dictates must be published, was more than 80,000 pages long.

Obama is sounding more like the dictator of a banana republic than the President of the American republic. He and his staff have repeatedly changed the rules for Obamacare in an effort to keep the program from totally collapsing. The Environmental Protection Agency is doing the same to destroy the coal industry in this country, as well as to implement the Administrationís agenda on "climate change." (Remember, weíre no longer calling this trumped-up crisis "global warming." In the wake of the winter storms that have been paralyzing much of the country, the environmental extremists needed a phrase that didnít make them look totally ridiculous.)

Disturbing as his comments may have been, Obama hasnít gone as far as Andrew Cuomo. During a radio interview last week, the New York Governor actually wondered out loud if conservatives should even be allowed to live in the State.

Hereís what he said: "Who are they? Are they these extreme conservatives who are right-to-life, pro-assault-weapon, anti-gay? Is that who they are? Because if thatís who they are and if they are the extreme conservatives, they have no place in the state of New York, because thatís not who New Yorkers are."

Be sure to note how Cuomo twists things to portray honest conservatives as extremists. If you believe that marriage should be between a man and a woman, that somehow makes you an anti-gay extremist. If you support the right to "keep and bear arms," as the 2nd Amendment promises, then you must be a "pro-assault weapon" extremist.

If other words, if you disagree with the liberal agenda, you are an extremist. And not only does the Governor of New York want to exclude you from the political debate, but he doesnít even want you to live in his State.

The bad news is that the left is getting even more open and arrogant about their intentions.

The good news is that more and more Americans donít like it. A majority of our fellow countrymen now agree that the country is heading in the wrong direction.

How do we turn it in the right one? One way is to nominate, and then elect, politicians who will stick to their principles after they are elected. Pay attention to what they say now. And even more important, hold their feet to the fire once they get to Washington.

Nobody said it would be easy defending our liberties. But somebodyís got to do it. So it better be us.

Until next time, keep some powder dry.

ĖChip Wood





The GOP Elite Arenít Really Interested In Winning The Presidency, And They Certainly Arenít Interested In Shrinking Government: Their main aim is to run a crony protection racket and maintain Americaís fascist system of governance for as long as the money holds out; all other goals are secondary
No group knows better how to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory than the Republican establishment; now they are pushing for an amnesty bill backed by Obama, Senate Democrats and corporatist handlers. America currently has the lowest labor participation rate in 35 years; yet the GOP establishment is advocating for a bill to bring millions of new workers into the country. GOP elites and party bosses claim an amnesty bill will make the Republican Party more attractive to Hispanics. Hereís what it will really do and why they really support it: It will provide corporations with a cheap labor pool, drive down wages, and send more young people to the unemployment line and onto the government dole.


The GOP Elite Arenít Really Interested In Winning The Presidency, And They Certainly Arenít Interested In Shrinking Government: Their main aim is to run a crony protection racket and maintain Americaís fascist system of governance for as long as the money holds out; all other goals are secondary.

The GOPís Losing Strategy

January 13, 2014 by Bob Livingston ó Personal Liberty Digest 

No group knows better how to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory than the Republican establishment. But this election cycle it seems they want to establish their losing strategy early so as to avoid any late-season drama.

Last Presidential cycle, the GOP ensured its defeat by abandoning conservatives. It followed its old script of nominating a milquetoast, faux-conservative warmonger in Mitt Romney, who was campaigning on attacking Iran and Syria and growing government. If that werenít enough, it engaged in dirty tricks during the primary to defeat Ron Paul, the only conservative in the race.

The GOPís actions during the primaries discouraged Paul supporters ó composed of a mostly younger crowd just cutting their teeth in politics, civil libertarians and doves of a more leftist bent ó from participating in an obviously rigged system. And if that werenít enough to turn off the Paul supporters, the elites humiliated them on the convention floor in Tampa, Fla. Then, when Romney fell short on election night to a Barack Obama who received 3.6 million few votes than he did in 2008, the GOP establishment blamed Paul supporters and the conservative Tea Party for not turning out.

Since then, rather than court them, the GOP has done nothing but antagonize conservatives, libertarians and Tea Party adherents. Establishment Republicans have spit in the faces of rank-and-file conservatives. The establishment has ridiculed and slandered those on the right who have advocated for smaller government, an end to wars, defunding Obamacare, an end to drone attacks, the repeal of National Defense Authorization Act unlawful detention and the Patriot Act, and the cessation of National Security Agency spying. Among the invectives theyíve used: whacko birds, crazy, unpatriotic, ridiculous and bullies who need their noses punched.

Establishment Republicans abandoned Senator Rand Paul during his filibuster over drone attacks in the United States. As evidenced by the popular reaction Paul received both from people who traditionally vote Republican and the Ron Paul crowd who tend to vote libertarian if they vote at all, the elites were on the wrong side of the debate.

The old guard abandoned Senator Ted Cruz during his "filibuster" over Obamacare funding, choosing instead to give only lip service to opposing the law. And given the popular support Cruz received, the elites again opposed what they claim is their base.

During the government shutdown, Weeper of the House John Boehner made a tepid effort to appear conservative and allowed the House to make a few efforts at repealing Obamacare. But he caved and capitulated without getting a single concession from Obama and the Senate Democrats ó again to the chagrin of true conservatives who wanted to see government spending reined in.

Karl Rove ó author of George W. Bushís leftist social and neocon war agenda and the losing strategy of the last two elections ó has declared war on the Tea Party and is combining with crony capitalists to create a big money political machine to swamp any conservative opposition to conservative-in-name-only incumbents. Not only that, his group is going after conservative incumbents like Representative Steve King, who have stood up to the establishment Republican agenda.

And itís not just Rove targeting the conservative base and the Tea Party. Republican Representative Steven LaTouretteís Main Street Partnership has two satellite groups ó The Main Street Advocacy Fund and the Defending Main Street SuperPAC ó planning to spend $8 million to back establishment Republicans who are facing Tea Party challenges in the upcoming election. The Main Street Partnership is funded by corporations and K-Street lobbyists. Its chief operating officer is Sarah Chamberlain Resnick, who also runs a spinoff group called the Main Street Individual Fund that received $50,000 from George Soros in 2002, and again in 2004.

The Defending Main Street SuperPAC received $400,000 from two unions in September and October: the International Union of Operating Engineers and Laborerís International Union of North America.

I have told you before there is little difference between the two parties in Washington, D.C. They receive their funding from the same sources, and they are beholden to the same puppet masters. They are sociopaths whose sole job is to maintain the perks and privilege of office.

The scowling visage of the surly, tyrannical Representative Peter King is all over the media these days. Heís been appointed attack dog for the establishment. His mission is to paint everyone opposed to the surveillance state and neocon war machine as unpatriotic America-hating cranks set out for the Nationís destruction. He and the establishment are trying to cover the fact that their military adventurism, cronyism/fascism and money printing are the cause of the economic malaise in this country.

Republican Representative Paul Ryan ó another establishment "yes man" and darling ó teamed with Democrat Senator Patty Murray in a budget deal that rolled back miniscule "sequester" cuts and added to the budget deficit. When conservatives cried "foul," the House weeper ó who owes his speakership to Tea Party efforts in 2010 and 2012 ó said Tea Party and conservative groups had lost credibility and were using Congress and the American people for their own goals.

Now Boehner and the House leadership are pushing for an amnesty bill backed by President Barack Obama, Senate Democrats and, more importantly, Boehnerís U.S. Chamber of Commerce and corporatist handlers. The country currently has the lowest labor participation rate in 35 years. There are 1.5 million fewer Americans working today than in 2006, despite a population increase of 16 million people.

Yet the GOP establishment is advocating for a bill to bring millions of new workers into the country. GOP elites and party bosses claim an amnesty bill will make the Republican Party more attractive to Hispanics. Hereís what it will do (and the real reason they support it): It will provide corporations with a cheap labor pool, drive down wages and send more young people to the unemployment line and onto the government dole.

The GOP elite arenít really interested in winning the Presidency, and they certainly arenít interested in shrinking government. Their main aim is to run a crony protection racket and maintaining the fascist system of governance for as long as the money holds out. All other goals are secondary.





Just Who Are The Big Liars That Are Killing America?
First, itís Obama and his socialist/Marxist cabal. Second, itís the lying politicians of both parties. Third, itís the lying media, up to their necks in a cover-up to support Obama and his destruction of the middle class and small business. Lastly, itís the moderate GOP establishment in Washington, D.C. None of them care about us. Theyíre all good buddies in D.C. in bed together with a common cause: getting re-elected, guaranteeing their own golden parachute and setting their kids up for life at our expense. Lies are killing America. Everyone in D.C. lies to trick us, distract us and confuse us. Pretty soon, no one even knows what the truth is anymore. The biggest lie comes from Obama, moderate Republicans and the media elite, who are all in bed together, trying to convince us that only ďmoderation, cooperation and compromiseĒ can save the GOPÖ and America. This is one of the greatest lies ever told.


Just Who Are The Big Liars That Are Killing America?

Moderate Establishment Republicans Are Killing The GOPÖ And America

January 9, 2014 by Wayne Allyn Root óPersonal Liberty Digest

Watch the video here ó http://personalliberty.com/2014/01/09/moderate-establishment-republicans-are-killing-the-gop-and-america/ ó or read the text of it below:

Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. Iím very clear on whatís killing America. First, itís Barack Obama and his socialist cabal. Even worse than socialist, most of them are Marxist. Second, itís the lying politicians of both parties. They lie to cover up their true agenda, and they lie to cover up their incompetence. Third, itís the lying media, up to their necks in a cover-up to support Obama and his destruction of the middle class and small business. Lastly, itís the moderate GOP establishment in Washington, D.C. They are fraternizing with the enemy. They donít care about us. Theyíre all good buddies in D.C. (BFFs, "best friends forever"), in bed together with a common cause: getting re-elected, guaranteeing their own golden parachute and setting their kids up for life, all at the expense of the rest of us.

Lies are killing America. Everyone in D.C. lies to trick us, distract us and confuse us. Pretty soon, no one even knows what the truth is anymore. The biggest lie comes from Obama, moderate Republicans and the media elite, who are all in bed together, trying to convince us that only "moderation, cooperation and compromise" can save the GOPÖ and America. This is one of the greatest lies ever told.

First of all, moderation wonít save the GOP. Nothing could be further from the truth. The fact is the GOP has had a long list of moderate "saviors":

ē Gerald Ford: loser

ē Bob Dole: loser

ē George H.W. Bush: loser (to Bill Clinton)

ē John McCain: loser

ē Mitt Romney: loser

So much for "moderation" winning elections for the GOP. The reality is the Republican Party has elected only one true conservative as President. Ever. His name was Ronald Reagan. I was there when my liberal friends at Columbia University called Reagan "loony," "nutty," "extreme," "radical, right-wing nutcase" and "out of touch with average Americans." Well, that "radical, right-wing nutcase" won in two massive Presidential landslides. And how about the results? This one true conservative President brought America back from the brink of total economic collapse, decline, malaise and misery. Reagan turned the worst economy since 1929 into the greatest economic expansion in world history. Reagan created 20 million jobs in just a few years. Then the 20 uninterrupted years of economic expansion that Reagan started created 40 million jobs and trillions in wealth. The mainstream media is desperate to make us forget all that.

You know what else the media doesnít want us to remember? That Reagan wanted massive cuts to spending, but in the end he listened to the media and "compromised." He agreed to increase spending to get his tax cuts that saved the U.S. economy. Now, Democrats and the media use that "compromise" to destroy Reaganís legacy by claiming "Reagan raised spending and built huge deficits." Well then, I guess "compromise" is bad for Republicans, isnít it?

You know what else the media donít want us to remember? Reagan cut income taxes from 70 percent to 28 percent, but then once again he listened to the media and "compromised." He allowed a few small tax increases in order to get Democrats to agree to future spending cuts. Now, the media accuses Reagan of "raising taxes multiple times." And, of course, the Democrats lied and never cut any of the spending they agreed to. So I guess "compromise" is bad for Republicans, isnít it?

You know what else the media donít want us to remember? That George H.W. Bush compromised on his promise: "Read my lips, no new taxes." Once again, in order to get Democrats to rein in spending, Bush compromised. Once again, Democrats lied and cheated. No spending was cut, but Bush got the blame for raising taxes. So I guess "compromise" is bad for Republicans, isnít it?

And when George W. Bush "compromised" by letting spending grow unchecked and never vetoing a single spending bill, we got an economic crisis, the banking system almost collapsed, the debt plunged us into a depression and Obama was elected. Gee, "compromise" really works out well for Republicans, doesnít it?

But wait, thereís more proof that this idea of "moderation" is a stone-cold failure. The GOP ran nothing but "moderates" for Congress throughout the 50s, 60s, 70s and even the 80s. The result was a permanent Democratic majority in Congress from 1954 through 1994. Moderation resulted in 40 years of unchallenged domination for Democrats.

The facts are in: When Republicans compromise their principles, allow bigger spending, agree to tax increases, support bigger government, and become nothing more than "Democrat-lite," they lose.

Then, of course, thereís the most powerful proof of all: the 2010 election. Led by the energy and passion of the Tea Party, Republicans achieved the most smashing victory in political history. They not only won Congress in the biggest landslide since 1938 ó and took a majority of Governorships ó but also won the most State Legislature seats since 1928. The media seems to have overlooked or forgotten about this, even though it happened only three short years ago.

After that record-setting Tea Party victory ó with polls showing the Tea Party more popular (by far) than the actual Republican Party itself ó politicians of both parties in D.C. panicked. They couldnít allow the country to be dominated by this idea of smaller government. Everyone in D.C. gets rich off big government. They couldnít afford to let the gravy train slow down.

So Obama and his socialist cabal, with an assist from big-government RINO Republicans, set about to destroy the Tea Party. The plan was to slander them, distract them, intimidate them and destroy them. It took a coordinated criminal conspiracy (some might call it "racketeering" or organized crime) by Obama, Democrats, big-government politicians of both parties, the mainstream media and, most importantly, the Internal Revenue Service.

Democrats called conservative patriots "terrorists," "arsonists," "radical," "extreme" and worse. The media quoted them all day and night, 24/7. And the IRS set out to intimidate, harass and persecute Tea Party groups and conservative critics of the President, until their energy was killed, their passion erased, their views silenced and their fundraising starved.

Suddenly, with true conservatives distracted, persecuted and on the defensive ó and with a wonderful "moderate" like Mitt Romney at the top of the ticket ó it was back to mediocrity and the loserís club for the GOP.

This is what Democrats and the media (I know, I repeat myself) want to convince us to go back to. Could it be that the media desperately want to convince us that a "moderate" will save the GOP, simply because they know a "moderate" will guarantee a Democratic Party victory?

But moderation, cooperation and "compromise" donít just lead to GOP mediocrity and defeat. They also lead to ruination for the United States of America. The proof is in the pudding. Weíve had decades of cooperation and compromise on Capitol Hill. The result? Seventeen trillion dollars in debt. And when you add in unfunded liabilities, well over $115 trillion in debt. All that cooperation and "business as usual" has produced a bankrupt Nation; the death of full-time, good-paying jobs; and the extinction of the middle class. Moderation, cooperation and compromise have killed the greatest Nation and economic juggernaut in world history.

If all that hasnít convinced you, how about some eye-opening facts provided by the Congressional Effect Fund. In the past half-century (since 1964), when Congress was in session, the U.S. stock market has been up 1 percent. During that same period, when Congress was on vacation, the stock market was up 17 percent.

So tell me what the benefit is of moderation and cooperation? The reality is no matter who is sitting in those seats on Capitol Hill, politicians are doing damage to our economy each time they compromise and agree to pass a bill.

Still not convinced? How about over a 100-year timeline (again courtesy of the Congressional Effect Fund). If you had invested $1 in the stock market starting in 1899, only when the Congress was in session, today youíd have $2. If you had invested the same $1 only when Congress was on vacation, today youíd have $300.

More proof that moderation, cooperation and compromise are greatly overrated. We donít need a moderate GOP to save the Republican Party or America. History actually proves that compromise leads to deficit, debt and economic decline.

The solution? We need to throw all the bums out. Every single one of them. Clean house. Then start over with Tea Party conservatives, with the same limited government principles as our Founding Fathers. They should be "citizen politicians" willing to make government smaller, make themselves less powerful and restore power to the people. They should all agree that government feels our pain only because government causes it. Government canít run the post office without losing $16 billion per year ó and thatís with no competition (by law). Government runs Amtrak; itís lost $40 billion and counting ó and still we lose more than $30 every time a butt sits down on an Amtrak train. Government runs the $16 trillion war on poverty that wasted and lost $16 trillion. Government runs our failing public schools. From now on, if a politician thinks "government knows best" or "government has the answer," he must be defeated, no matter what party he represents.

Oh, and one other thing: From this day forward, we must term-limit the politicians. Limit them all to two terms: one term in office and one term in prison. I call it "the Chicago Rule."

Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. Same time, same place. God bless America.





Obama: The Bullying, Lying, Spying Tyrant In The White House Who Has America Living In Decline, Crisis and Fear
Youíve got to hear the truth if you want to save America, save your job or business, save your civil rights and freedoms, and save your childrenís or grandchildrenís future. The shocking and disturbing truth is we have a tyrant in the White House. His level of bullying, lying, spying, distorting, manipulating, intimidating, demonizing and using propaganda to cram his policies down our throats is unlike any President in history. His name is Barack Obama. But it might as well be some Marxist thug like Fidel Castro or Hugo Chavez. The result is something none of us ever imagined: America living in decline, crisis and fear. An even better analogy is to compare Obama to Chicagoís own Al Capone. We have an organized crime gangster living in the White House who believes the ends justify the means. Heís playing the meanest, dirtiest game that has ever been played in D.C.


Obama: The Bullying, Lying, Spying Tyrant In The White House Who Has America Living In Decline, Crisis and Fear

The Bullying, Lying, Spying Tyrant In The White House

January 2, 2014 by Wayne Allyn Root ó Personal Liberty Digest

Watch the video here ó http://personalliberty.com/2014/01/02/the-bullying-lying-spying-tyrant-in-the-white-house/ ó or read the text of it below:

Hello, Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. Happy New Year 2014. Unfortunately, happy days arenít here again. I canít lie to you. I canít make something up to pacify you during a national holiday. My New Yearís gift to you is the truth. Youíve got to hear it if you want to save America, save your job or business, save your civil rights and freedoms, and save your childrenís or grandchildrenís future.

The truth is shocking and disturbing. The truth is we have a tyrant in the White House. His level of bullying, lying, spying, distorting, manipulating, intimidating, demonizing and using propaganda to cram his policies down our throats is unlike any President in history. His name is Barack Obama. But it might as well be some Marxist thug like Fidel Castro or Hugo Chavez or the old leaders of East Germany. The result is something none of us ever imagined: America living in decline, crisis and fear.

An even better analogy is to compare Obama to Chicagoís own Al Capone. We have an organized crime gangster living in the White House who believes the ends justify the means. Heís playing the meanest, dirtiest game that has ever been played in D.C. Let me explain the tricks of the gangsterís trade and how we are being played.

First, Obama uses his army of government employees to fix elections by intimidating critics and destroying his political opposition. The Tea Parties won the 2010 elections in a historic landslide. So just like the dictator/gangster Obama is, he used the Internal Revenue Service to attack, persecute and bankrupt them. He sucked out their life, energy and enthusiasm. The result: Amid the worst economy since the Great Depression, Obama won the election with his army of government employees doing the dirty work.

And just to be sure, Obamaís loyal government employee goons in the Census Bureau created fraudulent data about jobs in the weeks leading up to Election Day. Like all organized crime, the books were cooked. And I believe the fraud continues unabated every month. The jobs reports are either outright crooked, just made up out of thin air or certainly manipulated to make it look like we have a jobs recovery. We donít.

Thatís how gangsters and tin pot dictators stay in power: through an army of brutal enforcers doing whatever it takes to keep the boss in power. We donít have a President, we have a capo di tutti.

Donít forget Obama also used the IRS to silence free speech by attacking critics (like me) and hundreds of others who dared criticize him. Obama even stooped so low as to persecute a Stage 4 terminal cancer victim who criticized Obamacare. Only a few days after appearing on FOX News, this cancer victim at deathís door was audited by the IRS. Coincidence? If you believe that, I have a bridge to sell you in Brooklyn.

But thatís all childís play. The serious dictator/gangster wants to know your deepest, darkest secrets so he can extort and blackmail you. Obama uses the IRS to uncover his opponentís business and tax dealings. He uses the National Security Agency to listen to all our calls, emails and texts. He uses Obamacare to snoop into your medical and sexual history. Or didnít you know Obamacare demands that your doctor ask about your sexual history? That information is now in the hands of government (aka Big Brother). Obama understands whoever has the most information is in control.

Everyone has secrets they donít want publicly exposed, at the risk of losing your career, reputation or ó worst of all ó your wife and family. I believe Obama and his goons are using this information to extort and blackmail his GOP opposition.

If you donít believe this is happening, you are naÔve. This is the very point of all the three-letter government organizations: IRS, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), NSA. Obama uses them as his personal army, police force and Mafia hit men.

How else can you explain John Boehner calling Obama bad names and swearing to support small government, lower taxes, less spending and reducing the debt, and then turning around days later and agreeing to a deal to increase spending and raise taxes and the debt?

How else can you explain a true-blue conservative patriot like Justice John Roberts standing in full throttle opposition to Obamacare, writing the majority Supreme Court opinion against it, striking it down, killing it, and then suddenly reversing course to join the other side and write a new majority opinion supporting and approving Obamacare?

How else can you explain Gen. David "We Never Leave Anyone Behind" Petraeus, then head of the CIA, standing silently by while his CIA operatives were murdered and left behind in Benghazi? Obama refused to send help, yet Petraeus never said a word. Why? Was he being blackmailed over an affair? Now we know he was, in fact, having an affair. But at the time, no one knew Ė except, of course, the government agents listening to his calls and spying on his emails. Did they use that information to blackmail him, and then hang him out to dry after the fact? Perhaps the affair was the smallest thing they had on Petraeus. Perhaps thereís much more that weíll never know.

But everyone has secrets. Everyone does something wrong. Big Brother now knows them. And I believe they are using them to extort our politicians and military leaders.

Obama obviously has ways to control people. It takes more than wonderful speeches on teleprompter to make conservatives suddenly go against all their principals. My belief is that Obama and his Chicago hit squad has "the goods" on the opposition. They find your weakness, then hold it over your head like a sword. Theyíve uncovered transgressions, corruption, insider trading, tax cheating or photos of the political opposition in bed with the wrong person. They might even offer a deal too good to refuse: Vote our way, and weíll give you a $1 million-per-year lobbying job or law-firm partnership. Vote against us and weíll leak your embarrassing secrets and ruin your life. There is no other common-sense explanation.

What about Obamaís executive orders, ignoring Congress and the Constitution to carry out his big government plans: to give amnesty to illegal immigrants, to use the EPA to destroy the coal industry, to stop oil drilling cold in its tracks? The list is long. Just like dictators and Mafia gangsters who couldnít care less what laws say.

Or Obamaís henchman in the Senate, Harry Reid, dispensing with a century of tradition to allow Obamaís appointees to be approved by a simple 51-vote majority: a so-called "nuclear option." Why? To put appointees in places of importance with such radical Marxist backgrounds they could never be approved without rigging the system.

Then thereís the military purge, about which few Americanís know. Obama has fired more commanding generals in the past year, along with hundreds of junior officers on track to become generals, than any President in history. Itís a scene right out of "The Godfather," when Al Pacino kills every opponent standing in the way of his power.

This is not a happy commentary for New Yearís. But this is the commentary America needs to hear. This is my "tough love" New Yearís gift to America. A wake-up call. A gift that just might save your life.

Wake up, America. Because by next New Year (2015), it may all be gone: our country, capitalism, Judeo-Christian values, American exceptionalism and our childrenís future.

All wiped away by one man: a lying, spying, bullying tyrant in the White House.





Go Duck Yourself!: Christians and Conservatives, Not Gays, Are Coming Out Of The Closet To Say To The Obama Regime: ďWe have rights, too. We deserve free speech, too. Weíve had enough of your oppression and intolerance toward our values and beliefs. And weíre not going to take it anymore.Ē
A†duck hunter stared down the powerful forces of Hollywood and Hollywood blinked! And the result isÖ It isnít that gays are coming out of the†closet. Itís that†Christians and conservatives are coming out of the closet. A duck hunter may have fired the shot that ignited a new American Revolution. I really do believe this was the moment in time when Christians and conservatives woke up from a long slumber. It took a simple duck hunter to inspire us. And what Middle America is saying to Obama and his socialist cabal is:†ďWe have rights, too. We deserve free speech, too. Weíve had enough of your oppression and intolerance toward our values and beliefs. And weíre not going to take it anymore.Ē


Go Duck Yourself!: Christians and Conservatives, Not Gays, Are Coming Out Of The Closet To Say To The Obama Regime: ďWe have rights, too. We deserve free speech, too. Weíve had enough of your oppression and intolerance toward our values and beliefs. And weíre not going to take it anymore.Ē

Duck Commander Ignites A Revolution

December 26, 2013 by Wayne Allyn Root ó Personal Liberty Digest

Watch the video here ó http://personalliberty.com/2013/12/26/duck-commander-ignites-a-revolution/ ó or read the text of it below:

Hi! Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. Boy, do I have a merry Christmas story for you.

A duck hunter stared down the powerful forces of Hollywood ó and Hollywood blinked! And the result isÖ It isnít that gays are coming out of the closet. Itís that Christians and conservatives are coming out of the closet. A duck hunter may have fired the shot that ignited a new American Revolution.

Something amazing is happening: an awakening. More people showed support for the star of "Duck Dynasty" in 24 hours than signed up for Obamacare in its first three months ó which means that at this point in time, Americans are starting to come to the conclusion weíd rather have a duck hunter in the White House than Barack Obama. We couldnít do any worse. By the way, the duck hunter may be simple, but he never committed fraud to sell us his product.

By now, everyone knows about the whole controversy involving the reality TV show "Duck Dynasty" and its biggest star, Phil Robertson. Robertson made some controversial comments about homosexuality. That didnít sit well with Hollywood.

A&E Networks suspended Robertson indefinitely, which is another way of saying: "Youíre fired." A&E thought it was a cut-and-dried case. They thought, "Whoíd take the side of some uneducated, ignorant duck hunter?"

Perhaps someone should ask the executives of A&E what is feels like to step in duck poop? Because donít look now; but that uneducated ignorant, duck hunter just took down an entire billion-dollar TV network. Itís no joke. A&E made the biggest mistake in the history of Hollywood. It showed middle America (the people who watch their TV shows) how the thought police tyrants in Hollywood (and D.C.) really think.

And America told Hollywood to "Go duck yourself!"

Here is what has me in a celebrating mood this Christmas. The tyrants and control freaks like Obama, Hollywood, the leftist thought police and the media elite are shaking in their boots. They have visions of peasants with pitchforks and gas cans at the gates of their offices and mansions.

I really do believe this was the moment in time when Christians and conservatives woke up from a long slumber. It took a simple duck hunter to inspire us. And what Middle America is saying to Obama and his socialist cabal is: "We have rights, too. We deserve free speech, too. Weíve had enough of your oppression and intolerance toward our values and beliefs. And weíre not going to take it anymore."

A&E is backed into a corner, with no easy way out. Cracker Barrel has already backed down. That company took "Duck Dynasty" products off the shelves and got so many angry calls and emails that all the products are back on the shelf. Cracker Barrel actually had to issue an apology. In so many words, Cracker Barrel said: "We were flat-out wrong. Our customers have spoken." Wow! You mean Christians and conservative consumers actually do have power! Amen to that.

Itís about time we woke up and realized we have rights, too. And we have power. Itís time to not turn the other cheek. Itís time to stare right in the face of our oppressors and do unto them as they do unto us.

A&E claims the "indefinite suspension" (i.e., firing) of Robertson is about "branding." What itís insinuating is it couldnít possibly allow a close-minded, Neanderthal gay basher to remain as the face of its billion-dollar brand.

Well guess what? The new brand for A&E is "the Christian-hating, Bible-bashing, intolerant TV network." And in a Nation still dominated by Christians who actually believe in God, guns and the Bible, thatís not a viable brand. In other words: Oh, how the tables have turned. A&E is "ducked."

Let me explain my background. Iím a lifelong Republican conservative. My heroes are Ronald Reagan and Barry Goldwater. Iím a leading conservative commentator and bestselling conservative author of The Ultimate Obama Survival Guide. Yet Iíve always differed from my fellow conservatives on one issue: gay rights. Like my hero Goldwater, I have no problem with gays. Goldwater is the father of the modern-day conservative movement. Yet he, too, was pro-gay rights. In so many words, he once said of gays in the military, "I donít care if theyíre straight, I only care if they shoot straight."

Ronald Reagan was also open-minded toward gays, as a result of a lifetime spent in Hollywood in the acting business. Iíve always been pro-gay rights. I believe what people do in their private bedrooms is none of governmentís business.

But this isnít a gay rights issue. The firing of Robertson, star of "Duck Dynasty," is a free speech issue. Itís symbolic of the biased, one-sided way the media and leftist elites treat free speech. People have every right to express opinions considered "progressive" or "politically correct" nowadays. But the same rules donít apply to salt-of-the-earth, apple-pie, middle-class Americans who believe in God, country, guns and, yes, the Bible.

You mean Christians and conservatives donít they have the right to free speech just like Hollywood leftists? Just like Washington, D.C. socialists? You mean Christians or conservatives donít have the right to express their views in the workplace, without fearing for their jobs? You mean if any of us quote the Bible at work, we can lose our jobs?

Robertson only expressed his personal opinions. Those opinions are shared by millions of Christians not only in America, but across the globe. Agree or disagree, he had every right to express that opinion without losing his job. I may disagree with the exact words he chose, but I stand hand-in-hand with Robertson to support his right to say it.

Oh, by the way, Robertson is a reality TV star. His success and popularity are based on his opinions. A&E fired a reality star for having controversial opinions? Are you kidding me? A&E execs need to visit a psychiatristís couchÖ pronto!

The "Duck Dynasty" scandal is about intolerance. But the intolerance is on part of Hollywood and A&E. The star of a reality show is allowed to have opinions. If you donít like them, you have no right to ban them. Thatís intolerance. Thatís tyrant behavior. Thatís McCarthyism. Thatís the attitude of police states we find in countries run by tyrants like Josef Stalin, or Fidel Castro, or Huge Chavez, or the old East Germany. Is this what America has become under Obama?

I donít have to agree with Robertson to stand behind him. I support free speech. If it can happen to Robertson, it can happen to anyone of us. Iím a TV and radio personality. I have opinions. I wonít change them ó or back down. If you donít like them, change the channel. Thatís called freedom.

Defenders of A&E and Hollywood claim this is about "private property rights." They say a private business (like A&E) has the right to fire anyone hurting its brand.

That would be true if this were a fair two-way street. I, too, support private property rights for business owners (like me) to run our businesses anyway we want. Only the CEO should decide who works for his company, not government.

But this is not the way the rules currently work in America. If any private business said "I wonít serve a customer because of his race or sexual orientation," would that decision be allowed by government? Would Hollywood or the media elite take the business ownerís side? Of course not. So "private property rights" are extended only to people with the same views as Hollywood?

If a businessman, in his own private business, decided to fire any employee who supports gay marriage, would that decision be allowed? If a CEO fired employees because they were atheist, would that decision be allowed? If a CEO fired a woman because she was an outspoken supporter of abortion, would that decision stand?

How about if a CEO concerned about his brand said, "Youíre fired because your outspoken support of gay rights is killing my business" ó would that decision be allowed?

More specifically, how about a TV network firing the star of a reality TV show because he made remarks in an interview supporting abortion or gay marriage or stem-cell research. Would government, courts or Hollywood accept that decision? Leftists and gay rights organizations would beg government to intervene. And weíd see $100 million class action lawsuits galore.

So itís a lie to say that private businesses have a right to fire who they want. The law is used only to protect leftist and "progressive" views. This was never about "branding." It was about the shock and horror when people who drink Obama-Kool-Aid realized that their biggest TV star actually believes in Christian and conservative values. And heís popular. Gasp! This could be trouble. This kind of thinking could spread. They had to move quickly to silence him.

Why? Because Obama and his socialist cabal are petrified of free thought. They keep their modern-day Tammany Hall going through intimidation and the demonization of opposing viewpoints. They use Saul Alinsky tactics: destroying the reputation of your opponent and making a mockery of him and his views. They want to set an example. Once you see the star of "Duck Dynasty" lose his job and be vilified in the media for merely giving his opinion and quoting the Bible, youíll never try it yourself. Youíll be put in your place, too frightened to talk out loud about your views ever again.

Leftists, socialists, communists and intellectual elitists cannot afford to allow conservative or Christian values to be affirmed by a pop culture celebrity ó for fear it might start a trend. It might stir up the masses. It might encourage conservatives to speak out. It might embolden Christians to quote the Bible without fear. Hollywood cannot allow that. Because they know it could get out of hand. Americans might actually be inspired to fight back. Some of us might escape the thought-police plantation.

Well, Iíve got news for you: Itís too late. The spark is lit. You just woke a sleeping giant.

A duck hunter may have just ignited a revolution. Robertson just went from TV phenomenon to American hero. Salt-of-the-earth Middle America has been now unchained. The gloves are off. We are free to speak our minds. And the truth shall set us free. Hereís what we have to say to control-freak tyrants like Obama the Hollywood elite thought police: "Duck you!"

And now that weíre free to speak our mindsÖ

Letís start by throwing out that politically correct pablum "Happy Holidays." Itís time to stop cowering in fear. Itís time to say publicly and loudly "Merry Christmas." Itís not a generic holiday. Itís a religious holiday. Itís called Christmas because it celebrates the birth of Christ. Can you imagine that?

Open your window and scream it out loud: "Merry Christmas to all. And to anyone who doesnít like it, we donít give a duck what you think."

The revolution has begun. And capitalism still works, too. A&E just made Robertson a billionaire. Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. God bless America. Merry Christmas to all and to all a good night.





Obamacareís Deadly Deception: Obamacare was intentionally designed to crash and fail to force America into a government-controlled single-payer socialist/fascist healthcare system
The Obamacare deathcare system has imploded & the continuing narrative is that that Obama is working to fix the problem. Nothing could be further from the truth. The apparently flawed law is doing what its designers intended. Itís blowing up the private health insurance market & driving the country, inexorably, toward a single-payer socialist/fascist healthcare system. The people upon whom Obamacare depended as a premium foundation are rejecting it entirely. With no one left to pay into the system via premiums, insurance companies will howl for a bailout. Theyíll be considered too big to fail. Then government will take over the whole system that it purposely crashed. Itíll ration care, stifle innovation, remove healthy choices & deny people vital healthcare unless theyíre functioning contributors to society.


Obamacareís Deadly Deception: Obamacare was intentionally designed to crash and fail to force America into a government-controlled single-payer socialist/fascist healthcare system

The Obamacare Deception

December 24, 2013 by Bob Livingston ó Personal Liberty Digest

The Obamacare deathcare system has imploded, and the continuing narrative continues to be that the regime is working to "fix the problem." Nothing could be further from the truth.

The apparently flawed law is doing what its designers intended. Itís blowing up the private health insurance market ó which was already a morass of bureaucratic and regulatory argle-bargle and inefficiency ó and driving the country, inexorably, toward a single-payer socialist/fascist healthcare system one unConstitutional "regulatory" change at a time (at least 14 of them so far).

Central planning progressives, by word and deed, have long expressed their desire for a single-payer redistributive healthcare system. Obamacare has essentially accomplished that, while preserving the insurance companies as "middle men." Insurance companies bought into the scheme because, rather than having to battle over customers and depend upon individuals to pay their premiums, they preferred the idea of a captive consumer pool and premium payments guaranteed by the Federal Treasury.

One by one, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebeliusí regulatory tweaks and President Barack Obamaís exemptions are removing payers from the system. Theyíve created a regulatory jumble that has forced insurers to drop millions of policies that people were happy with in order to lump them into a one-size-fits-all box.

Premiums are high, deductibles are higher and the failure of Healthcare.gov and State exchange websites has rendered the redistributive "healthcare subsidies" incomprehensible. The few people who want to sign up canít. The so-called millennials, upon whom the system depended as a foundation, are rejecting the scheme entirely, choosing instead to pay the penalty and sign up only if they get sick rather than subject themselves to the theft.

With no one left to pay into the system via premiums, insurance companies will howl for a bailout. Theyíll be considered too big to fail. Then government will do what governments always do: print more money, raise taxes on the middle class and take over the whole the system that it purposely crashed. Itíll ration care, stifle innovation, remove healthy choices and lock people into Dr. Ezekiel Emanuelís dream world, where people arenít people at all unless theyíre functioning contributors to society.

This will put peopleís health in the hands of mind-numbed bureaucrats and automaton state doctors who march in lockstep to the collectivist system upon which their livelihood depends.





The Truth About Obamaís Economy: Unemployment Is Not Improving, The Jobs Report Is A Phony, And America Is Experiencing a Great Depression Under Obama Who Is The Greatest Jobs Killer In U.S. History
The biggest media scam of all is allowing Obama to report unemployment as improving, when the major reason for an improved unemployment number is due to people dropping out of the labor force [a record 932,000 in October] to go on welfare, food stamps and disability. Thatís what causes each monthís drop in unemployment. It isnít jobs; itís lost souls giving up because itís impossible to find a job in Obamaís America, or because it pays more to sit at home collecting welfare. The truth is America is experiencing an Obama Great Depression. Obama is the greatest jobs killer in U.S. history; things will only get worse from here. But Obama and the Obama-adoring mainstream media just keep lying and denying. Otherwise, weíd have rioting, unrest and perhaps even revolution in the streets.


The Truth About Obamaís Economy: Unemployment Is Not Improving, The Jobs Report Is A Phony, And America Is Experiencing a Great Depression Under Obama Who Is The Greatest Jobs Killer In U.S. History

The Jobs Report Is A Phony

December 12, 2013 by Wayne Allyn Root ó Personal Liberty Digest

Watch the video here ó http://personalliberty.com/2013/12/12/the-jobs-report-is-a-phony-root-for-america/ ó or read the text of it below:

Hello, Iím Wayne Allyn Root (WAR) for Personal Liberty. I am a small-businessman at ground zero. I donít need Barack Obama, the Fed, economists or the media to tell me how the economy is doing. I live it. And Iím telling you, weíre all being lied to. The economy is not getting better; itís getting worse.

Back in late 2007 and early 2008, I publicly predicted (numerous times) that we were entering the deepest recession since the 1929 Great Depression. At the exact moment I wrote about this, Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke was testifying in front of Congress that the economy was fine, we were not in recession, and there was little threat of a serious economic decline. It turned out he was dead wrong about everything. A small-businessman always knows.

In my national bestselling book, The Ultimate Obama Survival Guide, I predicted all of this: the decline of the economy, the death of jobs, the disaster of Obamacare and the murder of the middle class. Itís all happening in front of our very eyes.

Hereís what I know. We have a jobs disaster. The numbers are sobering. Yet the mainstream media is reporting the November jobs report as if "happy days are here again." Every media headline reports a "fantastic jobs report." And, establishment D.C. Republicans are so dumb, they accept government manipulated numbers as "fact."

The truth is itís all a lie. Obama propaganda. A massive cover-up. A Ponzi scheme aided and abetted by the Obama-adoring, Kool-Aid-drinking mainstream media.

First, are the numbers real? We recently found out in that in the run-up to the 2012 Presidential election, Census Bureau employees purposely reported hundreds of thousands of new jobs that did not exist. They created a false narrative that the economy was improving to fraudulently re-elect Obama. What makes you think thatís not still happening?

Why would you believe the jobs report from the same government that told you: "If you like your health insurance, you can keep it," "Obamacare will make your insurance rates go down" and, more recently, "The Obamacare website is fixed." All lies.

Why would you believe anything coming from an Obama Administration so corrupt that it sent the Internal Revenue Service to intimidate a Stage 4 cancer victim within days of his appearance on FOX News criticizing Obamacare.

But letís assume the 7 percent November unemployment number the national media has made its headline is accurate. Why isnít the media also reporting the governmentís own U6 figure of 13.2 percent? U6 measures unemployment combined with underemployment, a statistic that every expert agrees is the more accurate picture of true unemployment. If a Republican were President, the 13.2 percent figure would be trumpeted in every headline.

But this is only the start of the Ponzi scheme. Assuming that more than 200,000 new jobs were created in November, why donít the media report on what kinds of jobs are being created? Are these jobs that pay enough to live a middle-class lifestyle and feed your family, or crummy part-time jobs that donít even allow employees to eat without receiving food stamps? The answer, of course, is the latter.

Once analyzed in detail, Novemberís jobs numbers will undoubtedly be exactly the same as the rest of 2013. Respected economist and author John Lott reported recently that 96 percent of the jobs created in this Obama economy since January are crummy part-time jobs.

Respected billionaire businessman and publisher Mort Zuckerman disagrees. He says 88 percent of the jobs created this year under Obama are crummy part-time jobs.

No matter which figure you believe, the Obama "recovery" is a mirage. This economy is doing well only if you want a job at McDonalds.

Even worse for taxpayers, of the jobs government claims to have created, almost half are government jobs.

Folks, Obama is using your taxpayer money to create government jobs that actually hurt the economy and raise your taxes. Your typical government employee collects more money in retirement than they made while working. Every government job is a gigantic net loss for taxpayers. This is a disaster. This is one of the major factors for how America wound up $17 trillion in debt ó with a massive unfunded liability for government employee pensions. We desperately need private-sector jobs, not government jobs.

But this is no mistake. Obama is brilliant. He wants more and more government jobs, because government employees will always protect their jobs by doing Obamaís bidding (including reporting fraudulent jobs numbers at the Census Bureau, or persecuting Obamaís critics at the IRS). And, of course, they will always vote loyally Democrat and pay union dues (which turn into bribes that fund Democratic candidates).

How bad is the private-sector economy? A new study shows 41 of 50 States have lost private-sector jobs under Obama.

But even that doesnít tell the full story. Iíll make an educated guess that 80 percent of the few private-sector jobs actually created under Obama belong to big business. Obamaís policies have purposely rewarded his backers in big business, while gutting small business ó the economic sector where Americans can achieve upward mobility. If you want people to be self-sufficient, reward and encourage small business. If you want people to become dependent on government, create a "crony capitalist" system that puts government in bed with big business.

Small business drives the American dream. Like my father, who went from butcher to butcher-store owner, and then put his two children through Ivy League university. Jobs at McDonaldís, Home Depot and Wal-Mart are a place to get a start. But only a socialist like Obama (whose goal is to make everyone dependent on big government by wiping out the middle class) would consider creating low-paying jobs for big business a success. Next, of course, Obama dreams of giving amnesty to 10 million to 15 million illegal immigrants, guaranteeing (due to competition) nothing but low-wage jobs for decades to come.

Lastly, the biggest media scam of all is allowing Obama to report unemployment as "improving," when the major reason for an improved unemployment number is due to people dropping out of the labor force to go on welfare, food stamps and disability. In October, a record 932,000 people simply stopped looking for work.

Thatís what causes each monthís "drop" in unemployment. It isnít jobs; itís lost souls giving up because itís impossible to find a job in Obamaís America, or because it pays more to sit at home collecting welfare.

Facts donít lie:

The truth is America is experiencing an "Obama Great Depression." Obama is the greatest jobs killer in U.S. history. And things will only get worse from here. Or did you think a bad economy with no jobs would get better now that Obamacare has been unleashed on the Nation? Obama has attacked business with $1.8 trillion in new regulations for 2014, massive new Obamacare taxes and dramatic increases in the cost of health insurance. And, to top it off, millions of individuals and small businesses are losing their insurance altogether. And in the midst of this, you thought the economy would improve? You believed the lies, fabrications and manipulations coming from this Administration? I have a bridge to sell you in Brooklyn.

Things are getting worse, not better. But Obama, the Fed, government economists and the Obama-adoring mainstream media canít tell you the truth. Otherwise, weíd have rioting, unrest and perhaps even revolution in the streets. So they just keep lying and denying, while sending out government checks like candy to soothe the masses.

So the greatest Ponzi scheme in world history continues unabated.

Iím Wayne Allyn Root (WAR) for Personal Liberty. Enjoy your family and friends for the next three weeks. Rest up. Weíll fight to save America in the New Year 2014. Until then, merry Christmas, happy holidays and God bless.





Obama Is Incompetent, 'Beyond Learningí, Not His Own Man, and A Puppet of George Soros: Obama Is An America Hater Elected By Guilty Whites
"He's beyond learning. He has another agenda and, firstly, I don't think Obama is his own man," Walter E. Williams said. "He is a puppet of George Soros," he added, referring to the liberal billionaire. Williams said it is unfortunate that America's first black president is ďincompetent." "This is the first time in our history that a person could have been elected to the highest office in the land who had long-time associations with people who hate our country such as Rev. [Jeremiah] Wright. Obama was a long-time associate with Willie Ayers, who bombed the building along with his wife and other shady characters and so this says something about the American people who would elect a person to office like that. But maybe a whole lot of whites, maybe they had some of their guilt taken care of by saying, well gee, I voted for a black person."


Obama Is Incompetent, 'Beyond Learningí, Not His Own Man, and A Puppet of George Soros: Obama Is An America Hater Elected By Guilty Whites

Economist Williams: Obama Incompetent, 'Beyond Learning'

Newsmax ó Friday, December 6, 2013

 President Barack Obama will never able to learn from the late Nelson Mandela about how to properly govern a nation, says Walter E. Williams, a syndicated columnist and economist at George Mason University.



"He's beyond learning. He has another agenda and, firstly, I don't think Obama is his own man," Williams told "The Steve Malzberg Show" at Newsmax TV.



"He is a puppet of George Soros," he added, referring to the liberal billionaire businessman and philanthropist.



Williams believes Obama's presidency ultimately will be regarded along the lines of Jimmy Carter's "somewhat failed" administration.



He said it is unfortunate that America's first black president is "incompetent."



"Back in 1947 when Jackie Robinson came into the Major Leagues Ö he had to be that good. Blacks could not afford an incompetent baseball player," Williams said.



"And as a result of Jackie Robinson, [Roy] Campanella, and all these other guys, I can get out and play baseball, and basketball as well, and nobody watching my behavior can say, 'Well damn, those blacks can't play baseball or basketball..'



"That is, right now we can afford, black people can afford incompetent baseball players or basketball players or football players but they cannot afford an incompetent president. And it turns out that Barack Obama is an incompetent president and a part of the tragedy of it."


But he said that says more about Americans than about Obama.



"This is the first time in our history that a person could have been elected to the highest office in the land who had long-time associations with people who hate our country such as Rev. [Jeremiah] Wright, who said, well black people should not sing God Bless America but Ö Damn America," Williams said.



"He was a long-time associate with Willie Ayers, who bombed the building along with his wife and other shady characters and so this says something about the American people who would elect a person to office like that.



But maybe a whole lot of whites, maybe they had some of their guilt taken care of by saying, well gee, I voted for a black person."





Violence By Blacks Against Whites In Obamaís America Is Being Hidden With News Blackouts By The Liberal Media: Obama is carrying out a sinister threat to race relations, safety & liberty in America with his reach, politics & personal grievances against white people
There is a new game spreading across urban America called the Knockout Game or Polar Bear Hunting that could cost you your life. But donít expect the liberal media to report it since it is perpetrated by blacks against whites. Young black men walk up on unsuspecting white strangers and try to knock them out cold with a single punch. However, the far greater and more sinister threat to race relations in America is being carried out by Obama. He inserts himself each time a wrong is done to a black by a white, but he remains stone silent regarding black-on-black & black-on-white violence. It is Obamaís reach, politics and personal grievances against white people that shape his Presidency and, thus, threaten our safety & liberty


Violence By Blacks Against Whites In Obamaís America Is Being Hidden With News Blackouts By The Liberal Media: Obama is carrying out a sinister threat to race relations, safety & liberty in America with his reach, politics & personal grievances against white people

Knocked Out: Is America Becoming South Africa?

November 27, 2013 by John Meyers ó Personal Liberty DIgest

"Theyíre right. All those people who say itís our job to just sit and watch people die. Theyíre right." ó Spoken by Taylor Kitsch in the role of Pulitzer Prize-winning photographer Kevin Carter in "The Bang Bang Club," described by IMDB as "a drama based on the true-life experiences of four combat photographers capturing the final days of apartheid in South Africa"

There is a new game spreading across urban America, my friends, and you cannot buy it from Nintendo. Itís called the "Knockout Game." Caution: If you lose, it could cost you your life. But donít expect the liberal media to report it. You see, it is perpetrated by blacks against whites. That kind of news simply doesnít wash, especially under the Presidency of Barack Obama.

The game is not like chess. It comes down to human mechanics. Can a young man walk up on an unsuspecting stranger and knock him out cold with a single punch? It helps if the victim is old and an invalid. I am not sure whether there are bonus points for knocking out frail women over 70, but who knows?

Across New York, New Jersey and Philadelphia, black teens alone or in packs are being captured on video walking up to strangers on the street and sucker punching them as hard as they can. Robbery is not the motive ó only a "clean" (think of the irony in that word) "knockout" of strangers whose only offence has been to walk down the street. The game has also been coined by inner city youths as "polar bear hunting" ó a name that in itself indicates the color of the victims. The Knockout Game is becoming more popular and has spread to Illinois, Missouri and Massachusetts. Soon to be in a city near you?

News Blackout By The Liberal Media

I have not heard of such random and overt race violence since I spent time in South Africa at the very moment Nelson Mandela was being released from prison and the black majority was expecting him ó a man who would not renounce violence ó to ascend to the presidency of South Africa.

Fast-forward 23 years. In Brooklyn, the spread of gang violence has been captured over and over again. At least it has been recognized by Councilman David Greenfield, who said the victims rage in age between 12 and 78 years old. You donít have to be an expert to figure that these teens prey upon people the way hyenas stalk the sick and weak gazelle.

At least New York is trying to protect its people with increased police presence and a new bill that would allow Knockout Game players to face up to 25 years in prison.

Yet donít expect the mainstream media to report a word of it. They are too busy reporting on the latest happenings regarding George Zimmerman or any incident of white-on-black violence. News anchors like Anderson Cooper at CNN and others like Krystal Ball and Al Sharpton at MSNBC will never report such a story. Yet a few brave souls are willing to stand up to the liberals and their black agenda. That small group includes Greta Van Susteren, who wrote last week:

Do you know what is going on? That is young African-American teenagers viciously and gratuitously attacking a random victim, a teacher, in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Now, this violent act is what the teens where this is happening laughingly call "The Knockout Game."

I beg of Reverend Jesse Jackson, Reverend Al Sharpton and even President Obama to step up right now and speak out. Your silence will speak volumes, but your voice could make a big difference. Donít wait. Be leaders, they need you. We need you.

Can Van Susteren expect honesty on what is happening regarding race violence from Jackson, Sharpton or Obama ó three men who seem more committed to stirring it up rather than reducing its incidence? Of course not. Jackson is becoming irrelevant, while Sharpton plays the fool each weekday during his hour-long rants on MSNBC that attack what he calls the "white establishment."

The far greater and more sinister threat to race relations in America is being carried out by Obama. He inserts himself each time a wrong is done to a black by a white, but he remains stone silent regarding black-on-black and black-on-white violence. It is Obamaís reach, politics and personal grievances against white people that shape his Presidency and, thus, threaten our safety and liberty.

How can we be surprised? Obamaís hero is Mandela, a man who refused to renounce violence. I wrote about it in Obama Condemns Slavery, Then Celebrates The Life Of Terrorist Nelson Mandela. I spoke of my month spent traveling throughout South Africa in 1990. That was the same month Mandela was waiting his release from prison and was on his meteoric rise to the presidency of South Africa. It was a time when black resentments planted by Mandelaís Marxist African National Congress (ANC) had taken root, and there was murderous black violence against other blacks and large numbers of whites.

One night, my uncle and I strayed a few blocks past our hotel in downtown Johannesburg. Two policemen with submachine guns came upon us in disbelief and asked what the heck we were doing outside of our hotel at night. They said there was a good chance that such a stroll could end our lives, and then they escorted us back to our hotel. I remember that ó as an American who had lived only in Spokane, Wash., and in Calgary, Canada ó I was completely shaken.

Today, South Africa is one of the most violent countries in the world. Instead of the black utopia that Mandela promised, 50 South Africans are murdered every day. Whites live and work behind barricaded walls protected by armed guards.

Protecting Yourself In Obamaís America

After I returned from South Africa, I took up self-defense training and boxing. (Today, it would be called mixed martial arts.) I had an instructor, Matt David, who was a black belt in karate and a former California Golden Gloves Heavyweight Champion. David was an imposing man who more than once accidentally knocked me out cold while sparring, and he could throw me across the judo mats like a rag doll (not an easy feat because in those days I weighed more than 200 pounds). You might think a man like David and the presence he carried would be all the protection he needed. David didnít think so. When outside his gym, he always carried his Glock on his hip.

I cannot say what David needed to feel safe. That was his personal decision and his 2nd Amendment right. What I can say is that many parts of America are far more dangerous than what Spokane was 20 years ago. And while I have never met a more capable person of defending himself without a firearm than David, his No. 1 rule for personal safety was not to carry a sidearm. It was to not be in a place where you need one.

What is tragic is that in America there is getting to be fewer and fewer such places, and we canít even count on our leaders or their mainstream media to inform us where it is safe and where it is not safe. To do that would state the obvious: that America is becoming a less safe place by the month just as it was in South Africa two decades ago.

Yours in good times and bad,

ĖJohn Myers

P.S.: The South African Airways 747 we flew to South Africa was completely empty. On our return flight to London, every seat was taken, mostly by whites who were permanently leaving the country.

P.S.S.: The experience I had in South Africa and the violent meltdown are captured in the book The Bang Bang Club by Greg Marinovich and Joao Silva and in the 2010 movie of the same name.





Obamaís Poll Numbers Plummet To All Time Lows As He Has Been Exposed As A Liar, Fraud and Charlatan: However, Obama still could totally destroy what is left of the economy, the private sector, the American dream, American exceptionalism, Judeo-Christian values and our relationship with Israel
Clearly, Obama has to change the conversation away from his record. Clearly itís time for the ďweapons of mass distraction.Ē Itís time to pull out Roswell and Area 51: aliens and spaceships should do the trick. It will take something that big to distract the public. Just understand what comes next. While Americans are watching the aliens, Obama will totally destroy what is left of the economy, the private sector, the American dream, American exceptionalism, Judeo-Christian values and our relationship with Israel. In other words, heíll finish the job. God bless and happy Thanksgiving to you and your families. Letís give thanks for the greatest Nation God ever created ó while we still have it.


Obamaís Poll Numbers Plummet To All Time Lows As He Has Been Exposed As A Liar, Fraud and Charlatan: However, Obama still could totally destroy what is left of the economy, the private sector, the American dream, American exceptionalism, Judeo-Christian values and our relationship with Israel

Just In Time For Thanksgiving: Obama Exposes Roswell And Area 51 Secrets!

Nov. 28, 2013 By Wayne Allyn Root ó Personal Liberty Digest

Watch the video here ó http://personalliberty.com/2013/11/28/just-in-time-for-thanksgiving-obama-exposes-roswell-and-area-51-secrets/ ó or read the text of it below:

Hello, Iím Wayne Allyn Root. Happy Thanksgiving to all my friends and readers at Personal Liberty. If youíre a poll watcher like I am, Christmas has come early. Have you seen the poll numbers? Barack Obamaís ratings are lower than a crackhead. Literally. Obamaís popularity has fallen below the crack-smoking Mayor of Toronto, Rob Ford.

Obamaís ratings are so low, even MSNBC wonít take his calls. Obamaís ratings are so low, even Nancy Pelosi is removing the Obama bumper sticker from her limo.

Obamaís ratings are so low, senior citizens want Millard Fillmore back. Obamaís ratings are so low, Jimmy Carter is back in vogue. Obamaís ratings are so low, he called Hillary Clinton for advice, and she hung up.

Obama has sunk so low, he was caught asking Chris Christie for a pardon.

So knowing how the Chicago thugs in the White House operate, itís time for "the big reveal." Itís time for the "nuclear option" of all distractions. Itís time to induce hysteria. Itís time to make the National Enquirer jealous. Itís time for Obama to expose the secrets of Roswell and Area 51. Itís time for Obama to pull out the spaceships, aliens and gamma-ray guns. We are RomeÖ so itís time for bread and circuses!

Obamaís legacy has turned to crap. Everyone now knows the emperor has no clothes. Obama has been exposed as a liar, fraud and charlatan. The Chicago thugs in the White House canít allow that! Obama promised "free healthcare" and price reductions. Instead, we got massive new price increases that will bankrupt millions of Americans, force businesses to close and kill more jobs.

He famously promised, "If you like your insurance, you can keep your insurance." Millions have lost their policies. By next year, it could be 100 million (or more). He promised our quality of care would not be affected. Yet doctors are retiring by the thousands, and weíve added 30 million patients.

Five million Americans have already lost their insurance, while only 100,000 have signed up for Obamacare. Five signed up in Washington, D.C. Five. In Obama country. And the website is defective. Everyone now realizes this is a man who spent hundreds of millions to build a websiteÖ that doesnít work. We just put that same guy in charge of your grandmotherís cancer surgery? Oh vey.

Americans are finally waking up to the reality that "We wuz robbed." Someone obviously has a few hundred million dollars of our taxpayer money in a Swiss bank account. The FBI might want to start with Michelle Obamaís Princeton Black Alumni buddy.

Then there are Obamaís economic promises. His success there makes Obamacare look like a raving success. More Americans get government entitlement checks than are working in the private sector. More Americans are on food stamps than the population of Spain. Twice as many Americans now live in poverty under Obama, as the population of Syria. Fifty-seven percent of all the children in America are either living in poverty or defined as low income. Almost 50 percent of Americans have less than $500 in savings. And letís not forget the debt just went up $328 billion in one day ó thatís more than the budget deficit for the entire year 2007 under George W. Bush.

The jobs picture looks even worse than Obamaís economy. Three years ago, my quote made headlines in TIME magazine. I said: "Obama is the great jobs killer. Heís so good at killing jobs, he should be at the top of the FBIís Most Wanted List." Even I had no clue how right Iíd turn out to be.

More than 100 million working-age Americans are no longer working. Food stamp growth is 75 times higher than job growth. The workforce participation rate is the lowest in modern history. Black unemployment is at 14 percent. Almost half of black teens are unemployed. And more than 80 percent of the jobs created since Jan. 1 are crummy, crappy part-time jobs. How bad is the Obama economy? Bangladesh is throwing an "Aid America" concert.

Then there are the nonstop scandals. And I mean serious scandals. Any one of them would force a President Richard Nixon out of office. Obama owns all of them.

Benghazi: More absurd lies than Obamacare, a possible arms deal with rebels gone bad and the cover-up of murder.

Fast and Furious: Another government arms deal gone bad, responsibility for the murder of a U.S. border guard, another blatant cover-up.

The National Security Agency scandal: Obama listens in to all of our calls. I hope heís listening to mine. Heíll hear the word impeachment come up in every sentence.

The Associated Press scandal: Obama and paranoid buddies like Eric Holder are even illegally spying on their adoring Kool-Aid-drinking friends in the media.

The IRS scandal: To get re-elected, the Obama Administration sicced the IRS on Tea Party groups, conservative fundraisers and outspoken critics of Obama (like me). Their goal was to kill the political opposition, silence free speech and intimidate critics. These guys put the "thug" in Chicago!

The Census Bureau scandal: It appears government employees faked the unemployment numbers in the weeks leading up to the election to re-elect a President who wouldnít know what a job looked like, if it hit him in the face.

Oh, and letís not forget Obamacare: The worldís first trillion-dollar Ponzi Scheme perpetrated with lies, misrepresentations and pure fraud by a late night Ginsu knife salesman named Obama.

Clearly, Obama has to change the conversation away from his record. Clearly itís time for the "weapons of mass distraction." Itís time to pull out Roswell and Area 51. Aliens and spaceships should do the trick. It will take something that big to distract the public in time for the holidays.

Just understand what comes next. While Americans are watching the aliens, Obama will totally destroy what is left of the economy, the private sector, the American dream, American exceptionalism, Judeo-Christian values and our relationship with Israel.

In other words, heíll finish the job.

Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. God bless and happy Thanksgiving to you and your families. Letís give thanks for the greatest Nation God ever created ó while we still have it.





Can You Identify A Sheeple? Hint: Obama Loves Sheeple and They Love Him
There are 3 kinds of people: those who know, those who donít know and those who donít care to know. Members of the last group are sheeple. Sheeple Are Nothing Without The Collective, Sheeple Need Constant Approval From Others, Sheeple Are Incapable Of Original Creativity, Sheeple Have No Passion, Sheeple Are Useless/Non-Self-Reliant, and Sheeple Are Easily Forgotten. I cannot imagine a torture more vicious and terrifying than to realize in the face of oneís final days that one wasted his entire life trying to please the plethora of idiots around him. I cannot imagine a punishment more severe than to spend the majority of oneís years as a slave without even knowing it. I cannot imagine an existence more deserving of pity and remorse than that of the sheeple.


Can You Identify A Sheeple? Hint: Obama Loves Sheeple and They Love Him

 

You Should Feel Sorry For Sheeple; Hereís Why

November 19, 2013 by Brandon Smith ó Personal Liberty Digest

It is often said there only two kinds of people in this world: those who know, and those who donít. I would expand on this by pointing out that there are actually three kinds of people: those who know, those who donít know and those who donít care to know. Members of the last group are the kind of people I would characterize as "sheeple."

Sheeple are members of a culture or society who are not necessarily oblivious to the reality of their surroundings; they may have been exposed to valuable truths on numerous occasions. However, when confronted with facts contrary to their conditioned viewpoint, they become aggressive and antagonistic in their behavior, seeking to dismiss and attack the truth by attacking the messenger. So-called mainstream media outlets go out of their way to reinforce this aggressive mindset by establishing the illusion that the sheeple are the "majority" and that the majority perception (which has been constructed by the MSM) is the only correct perception.

Many liberty movement activists have noted recently that there has been a surge in media propaganda aimed at painting the survival, preparedness and liberty cultures as "fringe," "reactionary," "extremist," "conspiracy-minded," etc. National Geographicís television show "Doomsday Preppers" appears to have been designed specifically to seek out the worst possible representatives of the movement and parade their failings like a carnival sideshow. Rarely do they give focus to the logical arguments regarding why their subjects become preppers, nor do they choose subjects who can explain as much in a coherent manner. This is a very similar tactic used by the establishment media at large-scale protests; they generally attempt to interview the least-eloquent and easiest-to-ridicule person present and make that person a momentary mascot for the entire group and the philosophy they hold dear.

The goal is to give sheeple comfort that they are "normal" and that anyone who steps outside the bounds of the mainstream is "abnormal" and a welcome target for the collective.

It would appear that the life of a sheeple is a life of relative bliss. The whole of the establishment machine seems engineered to make them happy and the rest of us miserable. But is a sheepleís existence the ideal? Are they actually happy in their ignorance? Are they truly safe within the confines of the system? Here a just a few reasons why you should feel sorry for them.

Sheeple Are Nothing Without The Collective

A sheeple gathers his entire identity from the group. He acts the way he believes the group wants him to act. He thinks the way he believes the group wants him to think. All of his "ideas" are notions pre-approved by the mainstream. All of his arguments and talking points are positions he heard from the media, and he has never formed an original opinion in his life. Without the group telling him what to do, the average sheeple is lost and useless. When cast into a crisis situation requiring individual initiative, he panics or becomes apathetic, waiting for the system to come and save him rather than taking care of himself. Sheeple are so dependent on others for every aspect of their personality and their survival that when faced with disaster, they are the most likely people to curl up and die.

Sheeple Need Constant Approval From Others

Sheeple are not only reliant on the collective for their identity and their survival; they also need a steady supplement of approval from others in order to function day to day. When a sheeple leaves his home, he is worried about how his appearance is perceived, how his attitude is perceived, how his lifestyle is perceived and how his opinions are perceived. Everything he does from the moment his day begins revolves around ensuring that the collective approves of him. Even his acts of "rebellion" are often merely approved forms of superficial "individualism" reliant on style rather than substance. This approval becomes a kind of emotional drug to which the sheeple is addicted. He will never make waves among the herd or stand out against any aspect of the herd worldview, because their approval sustains and cements his very existence. To take collective approval away from him would like cutting off a heroin junkyís supplier. To be shunned by the group would destroy him psychologically.

Sheeple Are Incapable Of Original Creativity

Because sheeple spend most of their waking moments trying to appease the collective, they rarely, if ever, have the energy or inclination to create something of their own. Sheeple do not make astonishing works of art. They do not achieve scientific discovery. They do not make history through philosophical or ideological innovation. They remain constant spectators in life, watching change from the bleachers, caught in the tides of time and tossed about like satellites of Pacific Ocean garbage from Fukushima. The destiny of the common sheeple is entirely determined by the outcome of wars and restorations waged by small groups of aware individuals ó some of them good, some of them evil.

Sheeple Have No Passion

If you draw all of your beliefs from what the collective deems acceptable, then it is difficult, if not impossible, to become legitimately passionate about them. Sheeple have little to no personal connection to their ideals or principles; so they become mutable, empty and uninspired. They tend to turn toward cynicism as a way to compensate, making fun of everything, especially those who are passionate about something. The only ideal that they will fight viciously for is the collective itself, because who they are is so intertwined with the survival of the system. To threaten the concept of the collective is to threaten the sheepleís existence by extension.

Sheeple Are Useless

The average sheeple does not learn how to be self-reliant because it is considered "abnormal" by the mainstream to be self-reliant. The collective and the state are the provider. They are mother and father. Sheeple have full faith that the system will protect them from any and all harm. When violence erupts, they cower and hide instead of defending themselves and others. When large-scale catastrophe strikes, they either sit idle waiting for the state to save them or they join yet another irrational mob. They do not take proactive measures, because they never felt the need to learn how.

Consider this: Why do the mainstream and the people subject to it care if others prepare for disaster or end their dependency on the establishment? Why are they so desperate to attack those of us who find our own path? If the system is so effective and the collective so correct in its methodology, then individualists are hurting only themselves by walking away, right? But for the sheeple, successfully self-reliant individuals become a constant reminder of their own inadequacies. They feel that if they cannot survive without the system, no one can survive without the system; and they will make sure that individualists never prove otherwise. "You didnít build that" becomes the sheeple motto, as they scratch and scrape like spoiled children, trying to dismantle the momentum of independent movements and ventures in non-participation.

Sheeple Are Easily Forgotten

To live a life of endless acceptance is to live a life of meaningless obscurity. When one arrives at his deathbed, does he want to reflect on all of his regrets or all of his accomplishments? Most of us would rather find joy than sadness when looking back over our past. For sheeple, though, this will not be possible ó for what have they ever done besides conform? What will they have left behind except a world worse off than when they were born? What will they have accomplished, but more pain and struggle for future generations? In the end, what have their lives really been worth?

I cannot imagine a torture more vicious and terrifying than to realize in the face of oneís final days that one wasted his entire life trying to please the plethora of idiots around him, instead of educating them and himself and molding tomorrow for the better. I cannot imagine a punishment more severe than to spend the majority of oneís years as a slave without even knowing it. I cannot imagine an existence more deserving of pity and remorse than that of the sheeple.

ĖBrandon Smith





Obama Should Have Received Columbia Universityís Karl Marx Award For ďStudent Most Likely to Destroy America.Ē: Weíre being destroyed from within and the orders emanate directly from Obama; his centerpiece to destroy us is Obamacare
The entire Obama agenda to overwhelm the system, wipe out the middle class, bankrupt small business and destroy capitalism was hatched at Columbia University. We†never needed to fear terrorists, Russia, or China. Weíre being destroyed from within, and the orders emanate direct from our own White House. The centerpiece is Obamacare. Obamacare isnít about healthcare. Itís about bankrupting the middle class and addicting it to government dependency. Itís about redistributing [stealing] wealth from the middle class and small business. Its goal is to wipe out the last vestiges of middle-class America, creating a two-class society: the super rich and the poor (both beholden to Obama). Obama learned well; itís working to†perfection.


Obama Should Have Received Columbia Universityís Karl Marx Award For ďStudent Most Likely to Destroy America.Ē: Weíre being destroyed from within and the orders emanate directly from Obama; his centerpiece to destroy us is Obamacare

What Obama And I Learned At Columbia: How To Destroy America From Within

November 14, 2013 by Wayne Allyn Root

Watch the video here ó http://personalliberty.com/2013/11/14/what-obama-and-i-learned-at-columbia-how-to-destroy-america-from-within/ ó or read the text of it below

Hello, Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. Hereís a story every American patriot needs to hear. Whatís happening to America is not a coincidence. Itís not a mistake. Itís not fate. And President Barack Obama isnít dumb or incompetent. Heís brilliant, and this is all a purposeful plan. Iím a witness.

Remember when Geraldo Rivera opened Al Caponeís vault live on national TV? Well, Iím about to solve the mystery of Obama. Iím about to break "the Obama code." Iím about to tell you everything about the way Obama, and the people around him, really think. Iím about to rip open the true Obama plan to destroy our country, because I was there when the plan was hatched.

How do I know all this? Because I was Obamaís college classmate at Columbia University, class of í83. I was easy to recognize: the lone outspoken conservative in a class of 700 students. I knew I was in trouble when my first political science class at Columbia was "Communism 101″ taught by Professor Trotsky in the Fidel Castro Building, at the corner of Marx Boulevard and Lenin Drive. Iím only half-kidding. My experiences at Columbia were not far off.

Everyone needs to hear my story, because what Obama and I learned at Columbia explains exactly what Obama is doing to America today.

The economy in deep decline; the disappearance of jobs; the annihilation of the middle class; the demonization of business owners; the destruction of small business with onerous regulations and taxes; the overwhelming debt and spending of out-of-control government; the millions of Americans losing their health insurance; and the unimaginable increase in dependency through welfare, food stamps, unemployment, disability and now free healthcare: Itís all easily explained when you hear what Obama and I learned at Columbia.

I predicted all of this for five long years. Every prediction about what Obama would do and how jobs would be killed and what would happen to the economy has come true. Itís a purposeful, brilliant plan hatched at Columbia University to destroy capitalism, American exceptionalism, Judeo-Christian values and the American dream.

I never met Obama at Columbia. We were both political science majors, both pre-law. We graduated on the same day. There were perhaps 100 to 150 of us in the political science department. And I thought I knew all of them. As the token big-mouthed conservative patriot, I know they all knew me ó but not Obama. I never met him, saw him or even heard of him. Not one of my friends at Columbia ever met him either. At our 30th class reunion last May, I could not find a single classmate who had ever met him. Strange story, but I digress.

What matters is what Obama learned and experienced at Columbia. My classmates hated America. They spoke with glee about one day "taking the system down." They blamed America for "unfairness, racism, inequality and lack of social justice." Recognize those words?

My classmates proudly called themselves socialists, communists and Marxists. Even though almost all of them came from wealthy families (or perhaps because of it), they hated the rich and despised business owners. They talked about how the "white power structure" had to be dismantled, business owners bankrupted and capitalism destroyed. Everything in their minds was based on "social justice."

Sound like the policies of anyone you recognize in the White House? Does "We have to spread the wealth around" ring a bell? How about "If you own a business, you didnít build that"?

How about Obamaís hatred of Republicans and refusal to negotiate with Congress? Itís clear he thinks heís "morally superior" to conservatives. That attitude was born at Columbia, too. In 1981, when a student burst through the doors to our political science class and screamed, "The President has been shot. Theyíve assassinated Reagan," my classmates yelled, hugged, high-fived and jumped up and down cheering the death of a Republican. Today, most of my classmates are either in government with Obama or controlling the mainstream media. They talk about "moderation and compromise," but always remember 30 years ago they cheered for the death of a Republican.

But thereís more. We were all taught a simple, but brilliant plan. My classmates discussed it 24/7. It was their "American dream." It was called "Cloward-Piven," after former Columbia professors Richard Cloward and Frances Piven. To bring down America and our capitalist system, they were taught to overwhelm the system with massive spending, entitlements and debt. That would cause the economy to collapse, wipe out the middle class and bring Americans to their knees, begging government to save them. Itís the exact plan Obama has been implementing. The centerpiece is Obamacare.

Obamacare isnít about healthcare. Itís about bankrupting the middle class and addicting it to government dependency. Itís about redistributing wealth from the middle class and small business to Obamaís voters (the poor and unions). Its goal is to wipe out the last vestiges of middle-class America, creating a two-class society: the super rich and the poor (both beholden to Obama). Obama learned well; itís working to perfection.

So that explains the plan. But how do you implement it? We were taught that at Columbia, too. A key component of the plan involved fooling the voters by calling yourself "moderate" and a "uniter," even though you are a radical Marxist. We were taught to never admit what you really believe in. It involved demonizing your opponents, calling them "evil, greedy, extreme, radical and terrorist." Look in the mirror and call your opponents the very things you are. Obama learned well.

The plan taught us to hide your true intensions. (In other words, lie, misrepresent, commit fraud.) So Obamacare is about "saving the uninsured," as opposed to income redistribution. Government regulations are to "protect us from global warming," as opposed to wiping out small business. Amnesty for illegal immigrants is about "fairness," as opposed to creating 12 million new Democratic voters. High taxes are to "create equality," as opposed to starving Obamaís political opposition. Obscene spending is always about "helping widows and orphans," as opposed to bribing Obamaís voters. Higher teacher salaries to reward terrible performance are "for the kids," as opposed to enriching teachers unions so they can funnel hundreds of millions to Democratic politicians. Bailing out GM was to "save jobs," as opposed to saving bloated auto union pensions.

Itís always about lying to cover up the Marxist agenda of destroying the middle class, redistributing wealth and putting big government in control of our every move. Why the lies? We were taught at Columbia that "Itís for the greater good" and "We know whatís best for those people" and "The ends justify the means." Obama learned well.

But the key to it all is to "boil the frog slowly." We learned at Columbia to set the fire low, so the frog wouldnít complain. By the time he realized what was happening, heíd be cooked. Thatís why every Obama speech starts and ends with "Iím here to save the middle class," while his actions are annihilating them. Heís boiling the frog slowly. By the time the middle class realizes heís the killer and theyíre the prey, theyíll already be dead.

The root (excuse the pun) of every Obama policy, everything Obama does and everything happening to the U.S. economy, all started at Columbia. The entire Obama agenda to overwhelm the system, wipe out the middle class, bankrupt small business and destroy capitalism was hatched at Columbia.

Obama may not have attended class, but he learned well. He should have received Columbiaís Karl Marx Award for "Student Most Likely to Destroy America." We never needed to fear terrorists, or Russia, or China. Weíre being destroyed from within, and the orders emanate direct from our own White House. Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. Same time, same place. God bless America.





Is Obama Using Obamacare To Deliberately Push America Toward Civil War?: Are Americans being swindled into fighting and killing each other?
Obamacare is designed to fail. The government has no capacity to fund it, and never will. Its only conceivable purpose is to further divide the country and excite both sides of the false paradigm into attacking each other as the reason the system is failing, when both sides should be asking whether the current system should exist at all. At least 50 million welfare recipients exist as a resource pool to be used by Obama to wreak havoc on the rest of us. All he has to do is take away their cookie jar. Does anyone really believe that the White House, with billions of dollars at its disposal, could not get a website off the ground if it really wanted to? Does anyone really believe that Obama would launch his crowning jewel without making certain that it was fully operational, unless it was part of a greater scheme such as causing an American civil war?


Is Obama Using Obamacare To Deliberately Push America Toward Civil War?: Are Americans being swindled into fighting and killing each other?

 

Is America Being Deliberately Pushed Toward Civil War?

November 5, 2013 by Brandon Smith ó Personal Liberty Digest

In 2009, Jim Rickards, a lawyer, investment banker and adviser on capital markets to the Director of National Intelligence and the Office of the Secretary of Defense, participated in a secret war game sponsored by the Pentagon at the Applied Physics Laboratory (APL). The gameís objective was to simulate and explore the potential outcomes and effects of a global financial war. At the end of the war game, the Pentagon concluded that the U.S. dollar was at extreme risk of devaluation and collapse in the near term, triggered either by a default of the U.S. Treasury and the dumping of bonds by foreign investors or by hyperinflation by the private Federal Reserve.

These revelations were interesting not because they were "new" or "shocking." Rather, they were interesting because many of us in the field of alternative economics had already predicted the same outcome for the American financial system years before the APL decided to entertain the notion. At least, that is what the public record indicates.

The idea that our government has indeed run economic collapse scenarios, found the United States in mortal danger and done absolutely nothing to fix the problem is bad enough. I have my doubts, however, that the Pentagon or partnered private think tanks like the RAND Corporation did not run scenarios on dollar collapse before 2009. In fact, I believe there is much evidence to suggest that the military industrial complex has not only been aware of the fiscal weaknesses of the U.S. system for decades, but they have also been actively engaged in exploiting those weaknesses in order to manipulate the American public with fears of cultural catastrophe.

History teaches us that most economic crisis events are followed or preceded immediately by international or domestic conflict. War is the looming shadow behind nearly all fiscal disasters. I suspect that numerous corporate think tanks and the Department Of Defense are perfectly aware of this relationship and have war gamed such events as well. Internal strife and civil war are often natural side effects of economic despair within any population.

Has a second civil war been "gamed" by our government? And are Americans being swindled into fighting and killing each other while the banksters who created the mess observe at their leisure, waiting until the dust settles to return to the scene and collect their prize? Here are some examples of how both sides of the false left/right paradigm are being goaded into turning on each other.

Conservatives: Taunting The Resting Lion

Conservatives, especially Constitutional conservatives, are the warrior class of American society. The average conservative is far more likely to own a firearm, have extensive tactical training with that firearm, have military experience and have less psychological fear of conflict; and he is more apt to take independent physical action in the face of an immediate threat. Constitutional conservatives are also more likely to fight based on principal and heritage, rather than personal gain, and less likely to get wrapped up in the madness of mob activity.

Whatís the greatest weakness of conservatives? Itís their tendency to entertain leadership by men who claim exceptional warrior status, even if those men are not necessarily honorable.

Constitutional conservatives are the most substantial existing threat to the establishment hierarchy because, unlike dissenting groups of the past, we know exactly who the guiding hand is behind economic and social calamity. In response, the overall conservative culture has come under relentless attack by the establishment using the Administration of President Barack Obama as a middleman. The goal, I believe, is to direct conservative rage toward the Democratic left and away from the elites. The actions of the White House have become so absurd and so openly hostile as of late that I can surmise only that this is a deliberate strategy to lure conservatives into ill-conceived retaliation against a puppet government, rather than the men behind the curtain.

Department of Defense propaganda briefings with military personnel have been exposed. These briefings train current serving soldiers to view Tea Party conservatives and even Christian organizations as "dangerous extremists." Reports from sources within Fort Hood and Fort Shelby confirm this trend.

The DOD has denied some of the allegations or claimed that it has "corrected" the problem; however, Judicial Watch has obtained official training documents through a Freedom of Information Act request that affirm that extremist profiling is an integral part of these military briefings. The documents also cite none other than the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) as a primary resource for the training classes. The SPLC attacks Constitutional organizations and associates them with terrorist and racist groups on a regular basis. (Check pages 32-33.)

This indoctrination program has accelerated since January 2013, after Professor Arie Perliger, a member of a West Point think tank called Combating Terrorism Center, published and circulated a report called "Challengers From The Sidelines: Understanding Americaís Violent Far Right" at West Point. The report classified "far right extremists" as "domestic enemies" who commonly "espouse strong convictions regarding the federal government , believing it to be corrupt and tyrannical, with a natural tendency to intrude on individualsí civil and constitutional rightsÖ they support civil activism, individual freedoms, and self government."

Soldiers have been told that associating with "far right extremist groups" could be used as grounds for court-martial. A general purge of associated symbolism has ensued, including new orders handed down to Navy SEALs that demand that operators remove the "Donít Tread On Me" Navy Jack patch from their uniforms.

The indoctrination of the military also follows on the heels of a massive media campaign to demonize Constitutional conservatives who fought against Obamacare in the latest debt ceiling debate as "domestic enemies" and "terrorists." I documented this in my recent article "Are Constitutional Conservatives Really the Boogeyman."

Obama and his ilk have been caught red-handed in numerous conspiracies, including Fast and Furious, which shipped American arms through the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives into the hands of Mexican drug cartels. And how about the exposure of the Internal Revenue Serviceís using its bureaucracy as a weapon to harass Tea Party organizations and activists? And what about Benghazi, Libya, the terrorist attack that Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton allowed to happen, if they didnít directly order it to happen? And letís not forget about the Edward Snowden revelations, which finally made Americans understand that mass surveillance of our population is a constant reality.

To add icing to the cake, a new book called Double Down, which chronicles the Obama campaign of 2012, quotes personal aides to the President who relate that Obama, a Nobel Peace Prize winner, when discussing his use of drone strikes, bragged that he was "really good at killing people."

Now, my question is, why would the Obama Administration make so many "mistakes," attack conservatives with such a lack of subtlety and attempt to openly propagandize rank-and-file soldiers, many of whom identify with conservative values? Is it all just insane hubris, or is he serving his handlers by trying to purposely create a volatile response?

Liberals: Taking Away The Cookie Jar

Many on the so-called "left" are socially oriented and find solace in the functions of the group, rather than individualism. They seek safety in administration, centralization and government welfare. Wealth is frowned upon, while "harmonization" of wealth is cheered. They see government as necessary to the daily survival of the nation, and they work to expand Federal influence into all facets of life. Some liberals do this out of a desire to elevate the poverty-stricken and ensure certain educational standards. However, they tend to ignore the homogenizing effect this strategy has on society, making everyone equally destitute and equally stupid. Their faith in government subsidies also makes them vulnerable to funding cuts and reductions in entitlements. The left normally fights only when their standard of living and comfort to which they have grown accustomed plummets below a certain threshold, and mob methods are usually their fallback form of retaliation.

Austerity cuts, which the mainstream media calls the "sequester," are beginning to take effect. But they are being applied in areas that are clearly meant to create the most public anger. Reductions in welfare programs are also being implemented in a way that will certainly agitate average left-leaning citizens. The debt debate itself revolved around those who want the government to spend within its means versus those who want the government to spend even more on welfare programs. The loss of subsidies is at bottom the greatest fear of the left.

A sudden and inexplicable shutdown of electronic benefit transfer cards (EBT cards or food stamps) occurred in more than 17 States while the debt debate just happened to be climaxing. This month, cuts to existing food stamp funds have taken effect, and food pantries across the country are scrambling against a sharp spike in demand.

Remember, about 50 million Americans are currently dependent on EBT welfare in order to feed themselves and their families. The response to the relatively short EBT shutdown last month was outright fury. Imagine the response in the event of a long-term shutdown or if extraneous cuts were to occur? And where would that anger be directed? Since the entire debt debacle has been blamed on the Tea Party, I suspect conservatives will be the main target of welfare mobs.

The left, once just as opposed to government stimulus and banker bailouts as the right, is now unwittingly throwing its support behind infinite stimulus in order to cement the continued existence of precious Federal handouts. The issue of Obamacare has utterly blinded liberals to fiscal responsibility. Universal healthcare, perhaps the ultimate Federal handout, is a prize too titillating for them to ignore. Democrats will now go to incredible lengths to defend the Obama White House regardless of past crimes.

They are willing to ignore his offenses against the 4th Amendment and personal privacy. They are willing to look past his offenses against the 1st Amendment, including the Constitutional right to trial by jury for all Americans, and Obamaís secret war against the free speech of whistle-blowers. They are willing to shrug off his endless warmongering in the Mideast, his attempts to foment new war in Syria and Iran, and his support for predator drone strikes in sovereign nations causing severe civilian collateral damage. They are willing to forget Snowden, mass surveillance and executive assassination lists ó all for Obamacare.

And the saddest thing of all? It is likely that Obamacare was never meant to be successful in the first place.

Does anyone really believe that the White House, with billions of dollars at its disposal, could not get a website off the ground if it really wanted to? Does anyone really believe that Obama would launch the crowning jewel of his Presidency without making certain that it was fully operational, unless this was part of a greater scheme?

Already, liberal websites and forums across the blogosphere are abuzz with talk of sabotage of the Obamacare website by "the radical right" and the diabolical Koch Brothers. Once again, conservatives are presented as the culprits behind all the leftís troubles.

As I have stated in the past, Obamacare is designed to fail. The government has no capacity to fund it, and never will. Its only conceivable purpose is to further divide the country and excite both sides of the false paradigm into attacking each other as the reason the system is failing, when both sides should be questioning whether the current system should exist at all.

As the situation stands today, at least 50 million welfare recipients and who know how many others exist as a resource pool for the establishment to be used to wreak havoc on the rest of us. All they have to do is take away the cookie jar.

Who Would Win?

Who would prevail in a second American civil war? Tactically, conservatives have the upper hand and are far better prepared. Food rioters wouldnít last beyond three to six weeks as starvation takes its toll, and mindless mobs would not last long against seasoned riflemen. The military, though suffering purges by the White House, still contains numerous conservatives within its ranks. Outside influences, including NATO or the United Nations, are a possibility. There are numerous factors to consider. But I would point out that the most dangerous adversary Constitutional conservatives face is not the left, Obama or a Federal government gone rogue. Rather, our greatest adversary is ourselves.

If lured into a left/right civil war, would most conservatives be able to see beyond the veil and recognize that the fight is not about Obama, or the Left, or tyrannical government alone? Could we be co-opted by devious influences disguised as friends and compatriots? Will we end up following neocon salesmen and military elites who materialize out of the woodwork at the last minute to lead us to victory while actually leading us to globalization with a slightly different face?

If a civil conflict has been war gamed by the establishment, you can bet they have contingency plans regardless of which side attains the upper hand. In the end, if we do not make the fight about the bankers and globalists, the Federal Reserve, the International Monetary Fund, the Council On Foreign Relations, etc., then everyone loses. Who wins in a new American civil war? If we become blinded by the trespasses of a certain White House jester, only the globalists will win.

ĖBrandon Smith





Forget Impeachment; Itís Time For Criminal Prosecution Of Obama: Obamaís gigantic, purposeful lies and fraud about Obamacare will strip millions of proud middle-class families of their independence, self-reliance and self-esteem, by forcing them into government dependence for the first time in their lives
A gigantic fraud has been sold to the American people. Our lives, finances, jobs and healthcare system are being destroyed.†Our income is being stolen (Obama calls it ďredistributedĒ) based on a fraud. Who benefits? Obamaís voters & donors and, of course, the biggest health insurance companies in the country. That was the bribe to get them to go along with this fraudulent, Marxist scheme. But that was the real point of Obamacare from Day 1: government dependence and income redistribution on a massive Marxist scale. This is the first trillion-dollar fraud in world history. What CEO in the private sector would be allowed to walk? Not one. Obama should go to prison!


Forget Impeachment; Itís Time For Criminal Prosecution Of Obama: Obamaís gigantic, purposeful lies and fraud about Obamacare will strip millions of proud middle-class families of their independence, self-reliance and self-esteem, by forcing them into government dependence for the first time in their lives

Itís Time For Obama To Take The ĎPerp Walkí

November 7, 2013 by Wayne Allyn Root ó Personal Liberty Digest

Watch the video here -- http://personalliberty.com/2013/11/07/its-time-for-obama-to-take-the-perp-walk/ ó or read the text of it below:

Hello, Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty.

Forget impeachment; itís time for criminal prosecution. Obamacare isnít about incompetence, and it isnít about political disagreement. Itís about a trillion-dollar fraud carried out by the President of the United States.

Letís say a TV pitchman (you know, like the Ginsu knife guy) promised free health insurance. Letís say he promised: "If you donít like mine, you can keep your current health insurance. Period." Then millions of Americans, thinking they had nothing to lose, took him up on it. And then, because of this con manís lies, fraud and misrepresentations, they found the policies they liked and their families depended on canceled. When they went to his website for help to try to save themselves, they found it not only defective, but deceptive as well.

The few who could get on found they had to enter their personal information, even if all they wanted to do was compare plans and prices. And once they did this, they were trapped. Their personal information would be used to extort them. They were warned that if they didnít buy, theyíd be fined.

Can you imagine the outrage and criminal accusations coming from consumer protection advocates? Can you imagine how quickly the Federal government would shut down the business? Can you imagine how quickly a grand jury would be convened to indict the CEO? Can you imagine how quickly FBI agents, accompanied by SWAT teams with assault weapons, would swoop down on this CEOís offices with guns drawn and remove cabinets and computers with the media watching, with cameras rolling, with flashbulbs popping? Can you picture the CEO and his top executives being "perp walked" in handcuffs in front of the waiting TV news cameras?

The government would throw the book at these executives. For ripping off millions of consumers, including the elderly and innocent young children, the CEO would get life in prison.

Think of the personal stories, the tragedies caused by this purposeful lie, by this fraud. The small businesses forced to close. The middle-class taxpayers hit with dramatic price increases, left with a choice of paying the mortgage or the health insurance. How about the people whose policies were canceled and, because they couldnít afford this con manís "better plan" or because of a defective website, went without insurance for a time ó and during that time, had a car accident, leaving them unable to work and bankrupt with medical bills.

All of these tragedies were set in motion because a CEO lied and misrepresented. If this happened to one single American family, that CEO would go to prison.

Well itís happening to millions of Americans. And that CEO con man is Barack Obama.

A grand jury should be convened right now to indict the President of the United States for fraud on a massive scale. The FBI and SWAT teams should be surrounding the White House this week. Obama should be "perp walked" out of the peopleís house in handcuffs, with cameras rolling, with flashbulbs popping. He lied to us all. His fraud will cost each of us dearly.

This wasnít the usual politicianís "little white lie." This was a gigantic, purposeful lie that might cost 16 million (or more) Americans our health insurance. This lie will cost a typical family $5,000, $10,000, even $15,000 more per year for a new expensive policy none of us can afford or want.

Worst of all, this lie will strip millions of proud middle-class families of their independence, self-reliance and self-esteem, by forcing them into government dependence for the first time in their lives.

But then, that was the real point of Obamacare from Day 1: government dependence and income redistribution on a massive Marxist scale.

Weíve been conned. A gigantic fraud has been sold to the American people. Our lives, finances, jobs and healthcare system are being destroyed. Our income is being stolen (Obama calls it "redistributed") based on a fraud. Who benefits? Obamaís voters, Obamaís donors and, of course, the biggest health insurance companies in the country. That was the bribe to get them to go along with this fraudulent, Marxist scheme.

Obama makes Bernie Madoff look like a piker. This is the first trillion-dollar fraud in world history, and someone should go to prison. What CEO in the private sector would be allowed to walk? Not one.

Letís sum up the crimes:

ē We were promised no one would lose their health insurance. Lie.

ē We were promised you could keep your present policy, if you liked it. Lie.

ē We were promised costs were going down. Lie.

ē We were promised this would be easy. Lie.

ē We were promised that the middle class would not pay higher taxes. Lie.

But as the Ginsu knife pitchman might say: "Wait; thereís more!"

What if a private-sector CEO spent more than $600 million to build a website and happened to give the no-bid contract to his college classmate? What if after overspending hundreds of millions of dollars, the site didnít work? That CEO would be in handcuffs in a New York minute. And if his wife arranged the deal, sheíd be behind bars, too.

Well donít look now, but it happened. The most expensive website in history does not work. Obama spent $600 million of taxpayer money. The "fix" will bring the cost to more than $1 billion of your money. It was a no-bid contract. The top exec at the company that built the site is the Princeton classmate of Michelle Obama. They are members of the Princeton Black Alumni Association. She just happened to get a no-bid contract.

How could someone spend that much moneyÖ and fail? Itís just a website. Did millions of dollars go to Cayman Island bank accounts? Were bribes paid for Michelleís favor?

Obama knew millions of Americans would lose their insurance. He knew rates would skyrocket. And someone stole hundreds of millions of dollars building a defective website. Itís past time for impeachment; itís time for the CEO to pay for the fraud heís perpetrated. 

Itís time for Obama to take the infamous "perp walk."

Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. Same time, same place. God bless America.





God Bless America and Save Us From: The marxist lying fraud in the White House; the frauds, crooks, socialists & out-and-out communists in the Democrat Party; and the weak-willed cowards, dumb-asses, Obama colluders, and Stockholm Syndrome sufferers in the Republican Party
The country is going under. All appears lost. And the GOP fumbles, retreats and apologizes. Itís tragic, but itís now clear to see: The Democrat Party is filled with frauds, crooks, socialists & out-and-out communists out to bankrupt the U.S. economy, wreck capitalism and destroy America. The Republican Party is filled with weak-willed cowards who are either scared of their own shadow, in cahoots with Obama, or suffer from the Stockholm Syndrome. The Stockholm Syndrome is a psychological†phenomenon in which hostages†exhibit irrational empathy, sympathy & positive feelings toward their captors, sometimes to the point of defending them, or apologizing to them


God Bless America and Save Us From: The marxist lying fraud in the White House; the frauds, crooks, socialists & out-and-out communists in the Democrat Party; and the weak-willed cowards, dumb-asses, Obama colluders, and Stockholm Syndrome sufferers in the Republican Party.

Proof That The GOP Suffers From Stockholm Syndrome

October 31, 2013 by Wayne Allyn Root 

Watch the video here -- http://personalliberty.com/2013/10/31/proof-that-the-gop-suffers-from-stockholm-syndrome/ -- or read the text of it below.

Hello, Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. Look around. One thing that is clear is Obama and his socialist cabal is destroying this country, step-by-step, minute by minute. Heís killing jobs, strangling the economy, snuffing out capitalism, destroying our childrenís and grandchildrenís lives with massive debt, demonizing business owners, punishing success, and redistributing income from the makers (the job creators) to the takers (his voters). And while all this is going on, millions of Americans are losing their health insurance because of Obamacare. And now it turns out Obama knew this would happen as early as 2010. Yet he lied to us. He said no one would lose their present health insurance policy because of Obamacare. He knew that was a lie. Isnít that a crime? Isnít that fraud and misrepresentation to sell a billion dollar product? If any CEO in the private sector did that, heíd be in prison in a New York minute. Itís certainly time to impeach Obama for lying to us to sell a fraudulent product.

Oh one other thing. Forget how many people will go bankrupt or lose their homes because of Obamaís lie and the doubling or tripling of health insurance rates. Just ignore that for a minute. And think about this ó our government had three years to prepare for the start of Obamacare. Yet the web site is a mess. It doesnít work. Can you imagine asking this same government to oversee your cancer surgery? This isnít just bad, itís tragic. Weíve let Obama ruin the best healthcare system in the world.

But Obama is not the only one to blame. I blame the GOP establishment. Why are they standing by as Obama destroys America? Are they stupid? Are they lazy? Are they cowards? Are they so dense they have no idea whatís going on right in front of them? Are they in on it? Are they good actors just making believe they oppose Obama, but in reality they are on the same team? Or are they suffering from the Stockholm Syndrome?

The Stockholm Syndrome is a psychological phenomenon in which hostages exhibit irrational empathy, sympathy and positive feelings toward their captors, sometimes to the point of defending them, or apologizing to them. In other words, crime victims are in a state of denial about who the bad guy is, and eventually they take the side of the criminals who control their lives and threaten to kill them. Todayís GOP establishment appears to suffer from this mental disorder.

The real statistics of the Obama economy are mind-numbing:

Yet the GOP says little, does less, and apologizes at any attempt to resist. STOCKHOLM SYNDROME.

Obama and his socialist cabal call conservative patriots who believe in the exact same limited government as our Founding Fathers, "terrorists" "extortionists" "legislative arsonists" "unhinged" and "racists" (comparing them to the murdering KKK). They call anyone who questions the mysterious background of the most powerful man in the world, the man with his finger on nuclear buttons, by the divisive name "birthers." The GOP establishment not only doesnít defend their own base (their most loyal supporters), they go along with Obama to belittle the few courageous conservative heroes trying to save America from disaster.

THATíS A CLASSIC CASE OF THE STOCKHOLM SYNDROME.

Obama is rapidly turning America into a Big Brother Nanny State with nasty government bureaucrats controlling every aspect of our lives. He uses the IRS to destroy his critics and bankrupt his political opposition. He uses the NSA to listen to all of our calls and communications ó no doubt planning to blackmail opposition candidates. He uses Obamacare to demand sexual histories ó no doubt with more blackmail in mind. He uses the EPA to destroy any chance of America achieving energy independence from radical Muslim nations. He creates thousands of new government regulations to bankrupt business owners, thereby starving donations to conservative candidates and causes. He uses the SEC to extort political donations from companies under the threat of criminal prosecution.

Yet the GOP says little, does less, and apologizes at any attempt to resist. STOCKHOLM SYNDROME.

Then thereís the corruption. Michelle Obamaís Princeton college classmate just happens to be a top executive at the firm chosen to build the Obamacare web site. They are both members of the Association of Black Princeton Alumni. That firm just happened to receive NO BID contract worth more than $600 million. Then they built the worst performing web site in history. So where did the $600 million dollars go? Thatís not Michelle Obamaís money. It belongs to taxpayers.

Yet the GOP says little, does less, and apologizes at any attempt to resist. STOCKHOLM SYNDROME.

Nine commanding Generals have been fired and two suspended from the U.S. military in just the past year under Obama. Is he purging the ranks of the military of anyone who disagrees with his policies? For what reason? These are the men responsible for keeping our children safe at night. Something is wrong. Certainly questions need to be asked and investigations opened.

Yet the GOP says little, does less, and apologizes at any attempt to resist. STOCKHOLM SYNDROME.

Obama orders the IRS to destroy critics, conservative donors, and patriots, while allowing the same IRS to hand over $4.2 billion in tax credits to illegal aliens, who never paid taxes, and claim multiple deductions for kids who either donít exist, or donít even live in this country. Yet he doesnít ask the IRS to investigate this fraud, committed by criminals. Only conservatives get hit with IRS investigations under President Obama. If this was a script in a fictional movie, Hollywood wouldnít buy it. Itís that absurd.

The country is going under. All appears lost. And the GOP fumbles, retreats and apologizes. Itís tragic, but itís now clear to see: One party is filled with frauds, crooks, socialists and out-and-out communists out to bankrupt the U.S. economy, wreck capitalism and destroy America. And the other party is filled with weak-willed cowards who are either scared of their own shadow, in cahoots with Obama, or suffer from the Stockholm Syndrome.

Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week, same time, same place. God Bless America and save us from the Marxist lying fraud in the White House AND the cowardly Stockholm Syndrome-suffering GOP establishment. What a pair.

-Wayne Allyn Root





Why Obamacare Is Not A Train Wreck: Itís A Suicide Attack! The naÔve, stupid and cowardly Republican Party wants to hide from Obamaís ďsinisterĒ intentions for Obamacare
How stupid is the GOP? Obamacare was never meant to heal the sick or lower healthcare costs. The GOP needs to stop calling Obamacare a train wreck. That means itís a mistake or failure. Itís not. Obamacare is a brilliant and purposeful attempt to damage the U.S. economy, kill jobs and bring down capitalism. Itís a suicide attack and itís Obamaís grand, raving, rollicking, fantastic success. Here is what sinister Obamacare is succeeding at and was created to do: Bring about the Communist dream of redistribution [theft] of wealth; Wipe out the middle class and make them dependent on government; Kill every decent paying job in the economy creating only crappy part-time jobs; Bankrupt small business and starve donations to the GOP; Make the IRS all-powerful; and Unionize 15 million healthcare workers.


Why Obamacare Is Not A Train Wreck: Itís A Suicide Attack! The naÔve, stupid and cowardly Republican Party wants to hide from Obamaís ďsinisterĒ intentions for Obamacare

Why Obamacare Is Not A Train Wreck; Itís A Suicide Attack!

October 24, 2013 by Wayne Allyn Root -- Personal Liberty Digest 

Watch the video here -- http://personalliberty.com/2013/10/24/why-obamacare-is-not-a-train-wreck-its-a-suicide-attack/ -- or read the text of it below.

Hello, Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. There are two major political parties in America. Iím a member of the naÔve, stupid and cowardly one. Iím a Republican. How stupid is the GOP? They still donít get it. I told them five years ago, two books ago, a national bestseller ago and in hundreds of articles and commentaries that Obamacare was never meant to help America, or heal the sick, or lower healthcare costs, or lower the debt, or expand the economy.

The GOP needs to stop calling Obamacare a "train wreck." That means itís a mistake or accident. That means itís a gigantic flop or failure. Itís not. This is a brilliant and purposeful attempt to damage the U.S. economy, kill jobs and bring down capitalism. Itís not a failure; itís Obamaís grand success. Itís not a train wreck; Obamacare is a suicide attack.

Obamaís hero and mentor was Saul Alinsky, a radical Marxist intent on destroying capitalism. Alinkskyís stated advice was to call the other guy "a terrorist" to hide your own intensions; to scream that the other guy is "ruining America," while you are the one actually plotting the destruction of America; to claim again and again in every sentence of every speech that you are "saving the middle class," while you are busy wiping out the middle class.

The GOP is so stupid they canít see it. There are no mistakes here. This is a suicide attack. The telltale sign isnít the disastrous start to Obamacare. Or the devastating effect the new taxes are having on the economy. Or the death of full-time jobs. Or the overwhelming debt. Or the dramatic increases in health insurance rates. Or the 70 percent of doctors now thinking of retiring, bringing on a healthcare crisis of unimaginable proportions. Forget all that.

The real sign that this is a purposeful terrorist attack upon capitalism is how many Obama Administration members and Democratic Congressmen are openly calling Tea Party Republicans and anyone who wants to stop Obamacare "terrorists." Thereís the clue. Even the clueless GOP should be able to see that. They are calling the reasonable people, the patriots, the people who believe in the Constitution, the people who believe exactly what the Founding Fathers believed, the people who want to take power away from corrupt politicians who have put America $17 trillion in debtÖ terrorists. 

Thatís because they are Saul Alinsky-ing the GOP. The real terrorists, the real murderers of the middle class, the real job killers, the real bad guys trying to bring down capitalism are calling the patriots by a terrible name to fool, confuse and distract the public.

Obamacare is a raving, rollicking, fantastic success. Stop calling it a failure. Here is what it was created to do. It is succeeding on all counts.

No. 1: Obamacare was intended to bring about the Marxist dream: redistribution of wealth. Rich people, small-business owners and the middle class are being robbed so that the money can be redistributed to poor people, who vote Democrat. Think about it. If youíre rich or middle-class, you now have to pay for your own healthcare costs (at much higher rates) and 40 million other peopleís costs too (through massive tax increases). So youíre stuck paying for both bills. You are left broke. Brilliant.

No. 2: Obamacare was intended to wipe out the middle class and make them dependent on government. Think about it. Even Obamaís Internal Revenue Service predicts that health insurance for a typical American family by 2016 will be $20,000 per year. Thatís just the average. That means many of us will pay more than $20,000 per year. But how would middle-class Americans pay that bill and have anything left for food or housing or living? People who make $40,000 or $50,000 or $60,000 canít possibly hope to spend $20,000 on health insurance without becoming homeless. Bingo. Thatís how you wipe out the middle class and turn all of America into welfare queens. Thatís how you make middle-class people dependent on government. Thatís how you make everyone addicted to getting checks from Big Brother. Brilliant.

No. 3: As a bonus to wiping out the middle class, Obamacare is intended to kill every decent paying job in the economy, creating only crummy, crappy part-time jobs. Why? Just to make sure the middle class is trapped, with no way out. Just to make sure no one has the $20,000 per year to pay for health insurance, thereby guaranteeing they become wards of the state. Brilliant.

No. 4: Obamacare is intended to bankrupt small business and, therefore, starve donations to the GOP. Think about it. Do you know a small-business owner? I know hundreds of them. Their rates are being doubled, tripled and quadrupled by Obamacare. Between the dramatically higher healthcare costs, higher taxes, mounds of new regulations under Obama, IRS attacks on small business, the dying economy lowering their revenues and the higher inflation on everything we buy (even though the government claims there is no inflation), small business is being forced out of business.

Guess who writes 75 percent of the checks to Republican candidates and conservative causes? Small business. Even if a small-business owner manages to survive, he or she certainly canít write a big check to the GOP anymore. Money is the "motherís milk" of politics. Without donations, a political party ceases to exist. Bingo. Thatís the point of Obamacare. Obama is bankrupting his political opposition and drying up donations to the GOP.

No. 5: Obamacare is intended to make the IRS all-powerful. It adds thousands of new IRS agents. It puts the IRS in charge of overseeing 15 percent of the U.S. economy. Their government employees union gets rich and powerful. The IRS has the right because of Obamacare to snoop into every aspect of your life, to go into your bank accounts, to fine you, to frighten you, to intimidate you. And Obama and his socialist cabal have access to your deepest medical secrets. By law, your doctor has to ask your sexual history. That information is now in the hands of Obama and the IRS to blackmail GOP candidates into either not running, or supporting bigger government, or leaking the info and ruining your campaign. Or have you forgotten the IRS harassed, intimidated and persecuted critics of Obama and GOP fundraisers in Obamaís first term? Bingo. That is the point of Obamacare.

No. 6: Obamacare is intended to unionize 15 million healthcare workers. That produces $15 billion in new union dues. All of that goes to fund Democratic candidates and socialist causes, thereby guaranteeing that Obamaís friends never lose another election and that Obamaís policies keep ruining capitalism and bankrupting business owners long after heís out of office.

Message to the GOP: This isnít a game. This isnít tiddlywinks. This is a serious, purposeful attempt to highjack America and destroy capitalism. This isnít a train wreck. Itís a suicide attack. Obama knows exactly what heís doing. Stop apologizing and start fighting.

Oh, and one more thing: Conservatives arenít "terrorists." We are patriots and saviors. We represent the Constitution and the Founding Fathers. We are the heroes and good guys. Unless you get all this through your thick skulls, America is lostÖ forever.

Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. Same time, same place. God bless America and save us from this purposeful suicide attack upon America called Obamacare.





The Government Party [there really arenít two political parties anymore] Puts On A Phony Fight About A Government Shutdown While Elected Politicians and Their Staffs Are Deemed Privileged and Exempted From Obamacare: No doubt exists now that the government is set up to benefit the elites at the expense of the people
To the surprise of no one the Republicans capitulated. If you believe there are 2 political parties, you are blind & divested from reality. There is only one party, and it is the Government Party. The so-called furlough of 200,000 government employees became just a paid vacation for them. Republican Minority Leader Mitch McConnell was paid off with increased funding for a river construction project and other lucre. The politicians & their staffs were deemed privileged and exempted from Obamacare while we are consigned to this death system of rationing & extortion. No doubt exists now that the government is set up to benefit the elites at the expense of the people.


The Government Party [there really arenít two political parties anymore] Puts On A Phony Fight About A Government Shutdown While Elected Politicians and Their Staffs Are Deemed Privileged and Exempted From Obamacare: No doubt exists now that the government is set up to benefit the elites at the expense of the people

The Phony ĎFightí And The Real Story

October 21, 2013 by Bob Livingston -- Personal Liberty DIgest

At the 11th hour and to the surprise of no one, right on cue, the self-proclaimed party of small government capitulated.

Anyone who remains lost in the false paradigm that there are two political parties is blind and divested from reality. There is only one party, and it is the government party.

The government shutdown that wasnít was nothing more than so much theater. It was theater of the absurd.

The so-called compromise deal that reopened government signaled that the status quo big-spending, big-government, big-money-printing policies will continue straight through to collapse. Although a couple of politicians" took a stand" against big government (particularly against the Obamacare deathcare trap), there was no real appetite for fighting to shrink government or roll back any aspect of its increasingly intrusive power. In fact, the bill is laden with more pork than a bacon truck.

The so-called furlough of a few hundred thousand government employees became just a paid vacation for them. And in addition to a payoff to Kentucky Senator Mitch McConnell in the form of increased funding for river construction project and other lucre, tucked into the bill is a charming nugget of $174,000 for the widow of deceased Senator Frank Lautenberg. Lautenberg was listed as the eighth wealthiest U.S. politician in 2011 (his net worth then stood at $55.33 million), so his widow is by now no doubt in terrible financial distress. Finally, the privileged elected class and their staffs will be exempt from Obamacare, while the more mundane among us are consigned to the death system of rationing and extortion. These facts all prove the system is set up to benefit the elites at the expense of the people.

House Weeper John Boehner signaled the shutdown was all for show in his post mortem comments: "We did everything we could to get [Democrats] to the table to negotiate. They just kept saying, Ďno. No, no, no.í Thereís just no reason for our members to vote no today." He conveniently ignored the millions of Americans who were saying no, no, no to more spending in general and Obamacare in particular.

Most Republicans, particularly Senate Republicans, had signaled their capitulation early on. The "fight" was over before it began even though some, responding to voter support for Senator Ted Cruzís efforts to defund Obamacare, at least gave lip service to the idea that they should attempt to try and delay if not defund the implementation of the deathcare system that is killing jobs and creating a part-time economy now and will be killing people soon.

The elected class and their bureaucratic enablers in the Washington, D.C., cesspool all suffer from a psychosis that allows them to lie and steal without compunction. They ginned up a crisis in order to keep Americans distracted while the Obamacare rollout collapsed, and they worked behind the scenes to craft a bill that will grant amnesty to millions of illegal aliens.

Then they all agreed to reopen government until Jan. 16 and lift the debt ceiling through Feb. 7. Supposedly, House and Senate budget conferees are required to reach a budget deal by Dec. 13, but Washington found itself acting the part of fighting over the government shutdown precisely because there has been no budget agreement since 2009 and, therefore, no reign on government spending.

But with government funny money and phony accounting in play, a budget agreement is irrelevant. Additionally, all the sound and fury from the elected class resulted in only a 90-day "fix." Crisis governance will resume after the first of the year unless some cataclysmic event occurs before then.

The United States was never in any danger of defaulting on the debt, because there is no real U.S. debt and there is no intention for it to ever be paid. Government can and does create money out of thin air. With this ability there cannot possibly be debt. And if there is no debt, there is no possibility of default. Until this is understood by the American people, the elected class will continue to abuse the system and use fear and confusion to rule over and subvert the will of the American people.

For proof of this, the so-called debt, according to the Department of Treasury, remained at exactly $16,699,396,000,000 for 150 straight days. Were this a true and accurate accounting number, such a thing would be impossible. The numbers are much like the green strips you carry in your pocket: Created out of thin air. But people believe this sham and the media never questions it.

In May, the Congressional Budget Office estimated the Federal government would confiscate a record $2.7 trillion in tax receipts in fiscal year 2013, which would surpass the previous record of $2.6 trillion in 2007. Yet despite this, Democrats are already signaling they want to use the budget conference to raise taxes even more to support even more spending.

The CBO also said in May that government spending is expected to hit $3.55 trillion in 2013. That represents 22.2 percent of gross domestic product, the largest share in decades.

The Federal Reserve is throwing $85 billion a month into the air. Americans remain ignorant to its effects. The stock market is irrational. It spikes on bad news, knowing that the Fed will continue throwing $85 million into the air each month for the foreseeable future.

This money benefits the banksters and Wall Street, but it is devastating the holdings of the savers and retirees.

Corrupt political and monetary fiat systems always self-destruct, as they always spend out of control. The U.S. government is engaged in the greatest transfer of wealth in the history of the world. Most Americans are oblivious. Government is stealing by devaluing the U.S. dollar. Creating these new dollars dilutes all the dollars in existence. This is economic war carried out in secrecy and under pretense.

Trust in government and its monetary system begins to give way as the facade of benevolency and democracy morphs into force, intimidation and confrontation.

The process is gradual except when the elite miscalculates and does things such as assess private bank accounts to pay for the corruption of the debt money system as happened in March 2013 on the island of Cyprus.

The increase of overt repression and intimidation ó as we saw with the closing of the monuments during the "shutdown" ó will alert more and more people to the crime of government.

Exchange controls are a sign of a failing regime. Chase Bank (aka JPMorgan Chase) has instituted exchange controls. Thousands of account holders received letters last week indicating they will no longer be allowing international wire transfers or cash deposits or withdrawals in excess of $50,000 monthly beginning on Nov. 17. JPMorgan Chase ó along with the other "too big to fails" ó is a primary shareholder of the Federal Reserve.

Then HSBC USA announced its clients will have to wait a minimum of five days to transfer funds to their own international accounts beginning Oct. 20.

These are the first signs that the collapse is getting closer. Exchange controls are emergency measures enacted during times of economic distress and are precursors to wealth seizures by the State.

Your time to remove your money from banks is growing short. Get it out before the bank runs begin.

Protect yourself with gold and silver and stored food and supplies needed for survival. Guns and ammo are essential to own. We have very hard times ahead; but after the cataclysm, we can start anew.





The Devastating Truth Behind Obamacare: Obama is promoting a bald-face lie and a death-dealing lie. The government, not you, will decide if you will live, die or be treated
Under the Obama plan it will be very convenient to declare phony non-epidemics to provide an opportunity to herd the sheep [you] into clinics and remind them who is running the show. Go here, take this vaccine; go there, take that drug; the epidemic is endangering the herd, and you must help your brothers and sisters. Can you perceive the loss of individual freedom implicit in this universal system of health control? The widespread (and false) assumption is that more medical care for more people is a good thing. Thatís what the politicians, press, medical bureaucrats and drug companies tell us. This is the central piece of brainwashing. Itís a bald-faced lie. Itís a death-dealing lie. And now the American people are saddled with it. Unless the current rebellion against Obamacare expands all over the country.


The Devastating Truth Behind Obamacare: Obama is promoting a bald-face lie and a death-dealing lie. The government, not you, will decide if you will live, die or be treated

The Devastating Truth Behind Obamacare

October 4, 2013 by Jon Rappoport -- Personal Liberty Digest 

I want my Obamacare! I want my Obamacare!

Itís vital to look at the real meaning of this sinister plan. Itís all about the toxic effects of mainstream medicine. Thatís what the sold-out press is refusing to examine.

A year ago, I discussed the case of a young Michigan boy whose parents had been taken to court three times to force them to submit their child to intensely toxic chemotherapy treatments, despite these facts:

  • The boyís latest scans revealed no sign of cancer.
  • The drugs that would be forced on him can cause cancer.
  • The drugs have not been approved to treat children.

And I warned: This is what waits for you and your children, up the line.

The "share and care" humanitarian mask will be peeled away. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services will create, as ordered, a complete list of approved treatments for every disease label under the sun. And everyone in the insurance plan will be forced to take what the doctor tells him to take.

For a bonus, unapproved treatments will be banned. People and practitioners who try to use alternative treatments will find themselves in trouble.

This is the hidden agenda of Obamacare. This is what it will morph into in the future.

Iím not dreaming or fantasizing. Iíve been following and reporting on the medical cartel for 30 years, and I know the mindset of these people, these doctors, these bureaucrats, these pharmaceutical string-pullers behind the scenes. Obamacare is right up their alley. Itís about control, so itís an answer to their prayers.

So what do we know about their mainstream medicine, the hospital-based drug-addled modern version?

On July 26, 2000, the Journal of the American Medical Association published a landmark paper by Dr. Barbara Starfield: "Is US health really the best in the world?" In it, Starfield revealed what many people inside the medical establishment already knew: Every year, like clockwork, the medical system was killing huge numbers of people.

Each year in the U.S., as Starfield reported, there are:

  • 12,000 deaths from unnecessary surgeries.
  • 7,000 deaths from medication errors in hospitals.
  • 20,000 deaths from other errors in hospitals.
  • 80,000 deaths from infections acquired in hospitals.
  • 106,000 deaths from Food and Drug Administration-approved correctly prescribed medicines.

The total number of medically caused deaths in the U.S. every year is 225,000 (a conservative estimate).

This makes the medical system the third leading cause of death in America, behind heart disease and cancer.

In the wake of Starfieldís devastating report, other facts came to light: 2.1 million people in America, every year, are hospitalized as a result of reactions to FDA-approved medicines. Annually, 36 million serious adverse reactions to those drugs occur.

So inclusive health coverage for many more Americans under the Obama plan means these horrendous figures will rise.

This is the dirty secret.

Obama and his allies are promoting a medical system that is the third leading cause of death in America. Itís that stark, and itís that simple.

The Obama plan involves appointing an "expert panel" to decide what treatments Americans should be given for what diseases, under the new regime.

Only a certified idiot would assume that, over time, alternative non-mainstream therapies would survive such an ongoing vetting. Hope may spring eternal, but common sense makes it easy to grasp the realities on the ground.

In the long run, alternative therapies will be edged out. Those that remain will be permitted for a narrow range of conditions, or as adjuncts to standard drug treatments and surgery.

Chiropractors and acupuncturists, who are temporarily basking in the notion that Obama "really cares," are in for a very rude awakening. Their careers and practices will be significantly reduced. Not today and not tomorrow, but it will happen.

Doctors, under the plan, will be telling patients they may not take nutritional supplements while in treatment. This will assume the status of an irreversible edict. In many cases, "while in treatment" will mean years.

What happens to a person, conscripted into the mandated Insurance plan, who is told by his doctor that he should/must receive a vaccine? Suppose this person says no? What are the consequences? Will he then be labeled a defector? What penalties will he suffer?

Does a diagnosis of cancer imply a patient must submit to chemotherapy, radiation and surgery? Can these treatments be forced upon him?

Perhaps, in the early days of the plan, nothing untoward will happen. But then, as time passes and the system assumes tighter and tighter controls, the hand of government will close around the recalcitrant patientís neck.

"Take this vaccine. Take this chemo drug. If you donít, youíre in violation of the rules."

Doctors, who are an integral part of the plan, will surely be punished if they give unapproved (alternative) treatments to patients.

And in order to make the plan operate on a day-to-day basis, the records and bookkeeping data of every healthcare practitioner in America will eventually be tracked on government computer networks.

Every person in America will have a traceable and trackable medical ID package. Government-issued. There is no way around it.  The monitoring apparatus canít work without it.

Orwellian consequences lie up the road in the field of psychiatric practice. In case you hadnít noticed, the invention of "disorders" by committee is the preferred method for "discovering" more and more mental illnesses.

Yet, the science is completely fraudulent. For evidence, consult the many works of psychiatrist Peter Breggin, who has done more than any other person to expose the guts of his own profession. Breggin establishes that mental disorders are not authoritatively diagnosed by a chemical or biological test. Conclusive tests do not exist. And, worse, in this undefined and arbitrary territory, the drugs that follow diagnoses are killers: for example, 300,000 cases of motor brain damage, as a result of the administration of major tranquilizers.

Under the Obama plan, you can bet your bottom dollar that psychiatric care will eventually become mandatory. A patient suddenly diagnosed with clinical depression or bipolar disorder will be told he must take the drugs ó and suffer their adverse effects.

Very young children will be given more and more debilitating and dangerous brain drugs.

Under the Obama plan, it will be very convenient to declare new pandemics every few seasons, because these phony non-epidemics provide an opportunity to herd the sheep into clinics and remind them who is running the show. Go here, take this vaccine; go there, take that drug; the epidemic is endangering the herd, and you must help your brothers and sisters.

These are the figures on the past several "epidemics." They are not yearly; they are grand totals, to date; global totals, except in the case of West Nile (U.S. only):

  • SARS: 774 deaths.
  • West Nile: 1159 deaths.
  • Bird flu: 262 deaths.
  • Smallpox (terrorist threat): 0 deaths.
  • Swine flu: 18,500 deaths.

To give perspective, globally, 250,000 to 500,000 people die of ordinary flu-like illness every year. Yet this higher death rate accrues no interest as an epidemic. It is only the "teaching (brainwashing) moments" of the phony epidemics that are promoted by health agencies (e.g., the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization) and their pharmaceutical allies, who rake in billions of dollars by manufacturing new vaccines.

Yes, under the Obama plan, there will be more declared health emergencies; and they will serve to cement the citizen to his new role as eternal patient in the medical march along bleak streets of the future.

Can you perceive the loss of individual freedom implicit in this universal system of health control?

The widespread (and false) assumption is that more medical care for more people is a good thing. Thatís what the politicians and the press tell us. Thatís what the medical bureaucrats and the drug companies tell us. This is the central piece of brainwashing.

Itís a bald-faced lie. Itís a death-dealing lie.

And now the American people are saddled with it.

Unless the current rebellion against Obamacare expands all over the country.

ĖJon Rappoport





Obamacare's Mandate Of Death And Destruction: Nothing about Obamacare is healthcare
Obamacare is a socialist death trap of graft & corruption. It was created by lobbyists for the medical industrial complex as a way of growing its consumer base with the guarantee of benefit payments from the Federal Treasury. It's a redistributive system that steals from the producers in order to feed the corporatocracy. Nothing about Obamacare is healthcare. It is simply medical tyranny created under the guise of political doublespeak. America's healthcare system is a profit-driven, disease-oriented death system. It is a system of conflict of interest, tainted research, greed for money, deceived & pretentious doctors & scientists, lying & cheating, invasion by the morally bankrupt marketing automatons of the drug industry, greedy power-hungry politicians, and Federal & State regulators. It is all about money generated on the sick & the dying.


Obamacare's Mandate Of Death And Destruction: Nothing about Obamacare is healthcare.

Obamacare's Mandate Of Death And Destruction

October 14, 2013 by Bob Livingston -- Personal Liberty Digest 

Cars on the Obamacare Express jumped the track and began piling up as soon as the Healthcare.gov website went live on Oct. 1, and the expected Obamacare train wreck continues to create its carnage.

Of course, the carnage is just beginning. Obamacare is a socialist death trap of graft and corruption. It was created by lobbyists for the medical industrial complex as a way of growing its consumer base with the guarantee of benefit payments from the Federal Treasury. It's a redistributive system that steals from the producers in order to feed the corporatocracy.

Nothing about Obamacare is healthcare. It is simply medical tyranny created under the guise of political doublespeak. It sounds great to promise free or low-cost health insurance for everyone until people begin to learn the true cost of "free" government programs.

America's healthcare system is a profit-driven, disease-oriented death system. It is a system of conflict of interest, tainted research, greed for money, deceived and pretentious doctors and scientists, lying, cheating, invasion by the morally bankrupt marketing automatons of the drug industry, greedy power-hungry politicians, and Federal and State regulators. It is all about money generated on the sick and the dying.

I will quickly give you a valid exception, and that is if one needs trauma care. It is generally and quickly available and most of the time life-saving. But this is a very small part of medical practice in America.

The sick care industry is not only profiting from the sick and dying; it is the greatest cause of sickness and premature death. And it is a U.S. government industry. It is sponsored and financed by the U.S. government. There would not be a single hospital in the United States without Federal funny money and the insurance business.

In fact, it's very deceptive to call Obamacare socialized healthcare as Obamacare has nothing to do with healthcare. It's just the opposite. It's sickness care.

The Nazis had their gas chambers and America has "medical care," which is the most sophisticated killing machine that demented minds can create.

Americans are mentally dependent on the "medical" brainwash. When our dumbed-down people hear the trigger word "medical care," they go blind and hyperventilate. They do not know a scam from a sham.

The great debate going on is spurious in its entirety. There is no truth to be found in it. It's a comedy. As the paper money regime collapses, the money creators are speeding up the printing presses in a desperate ploy to transfer the wealth of the American people before it becomes worthless anyway. It is disguised warfare against the American people.

It reminds one of the last days of the Nazi regime. As the cities were reduced to rubble, German citizens were being shot for "treason." In the last days of any regime, the process of oppression of citizens is intensified.

In the United States, stepped-up oppression is being done under the cloak of benevolency called healthcare.

In fact, there is now very high risk in going to the hospital. Besides the hundreds of thousands of drug-induced deaths (iatrogenic deaths), there are people who check into hospitals and unexpectedly die of viral pneumonia that antibiotics can't help. Tuberculosis has returned to America, including drug-resistant strains. Drug-resistant bacteria are rampant. One in 20 hospital patients now picks up an infection he did not have when he arrived. Even what appears to be the old common cold is lasting for months.

"There are about 2 million people who acquire infection from the hospital each year and become sick," said Charlottesville, Va., infectious disease expert Barry Farr, M.D. "Most don't die, but some do." About 100,000 die each year, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Obamacare locks you into this system with no way out. Once the government is in the business of determining approved treatments and payments, alternative treatment regimens are prohibited. And failure to follow the prescribed treatment will result in fines or imprisonment. (This sort of medical tyranny has already manifested itself in the treatment of children's ailments; see here and here for just two such examples.)

And it seems the Obamacare system permanently captures you as well. Those few who have managed to access the deeply flawed system have learned that deleting an account and the personal information entered is impossible.

And what is that information? Everything the government needs to know to confiscate your wealth from you completely in the event of noncompliance.

Everyone is forced to sign up for a system that is unavailable to them because of the failure of the Healthcare.gov website which some computer experts believe was either designed to fail or built by a team of incompetent chimpanzees.

Mike Adams of NaturalNews.com has studied the publicly available Javascript code and found it riddled with errors, filler and absurdities. It is so bad, he writes, that it probably was never even alpha tested, much less beta tested; and it appears to have been designed to fail. He doubts it can ever be repaired despite the millions of dollars paid for its construction.

About 90 percent of those who tried to enroll say they were not able to get signed up. And of those, about 50,000 people who were able to get through in the system's first 11 days, only about 1 percent have submitted enough information to be successfully enrolled, according to health industry executives.

Nationwide, there are 11.6 million people ages 18 to 34 who are uninsured, according to the Department of Health and Human Services. Obamacare is a Ponzi scheme designed to sit on the backs of the young and healthy. But they are not interested in it once they learn their premium costs will run in the hundreds of dollars per month, deductibles are $5,000 or more per year and the copays are outrageously high.

The lack of support from young people is ominous. "The entire Rube Goldberg apparatus depends on young, healthy people signing up to cross-subsidize more expensive patients and prevent health plans from going into a death spiral in which premiums don't cover claims," said The Wall Street Journal. "Good luck getting millennials to sign up when plans aren't merely more expensive but when the exchanges malfunction, or doctors don't accept exchange coverage because someone checked the wrong box, or any number of myriad administrative problems."

Yet despite all this and despite the fact that a vast majority of Americans want no part of it (hence, the mandate requiring everyone to sign up under penalty of fines and forfeiture of as-yet undetermined amounts of personal property), every effort to repeal or defund Obamacare has been backed by only a handful of non-statists and opposed by the regime and the statists who are more interested in control, power, pleasing the medical cartel and sapping Americans of their wealth and health than in doing what's right for Americans and following the Constitution.





From Heil Hitler! To Heil Obama!: Obamacare Provides Millions of Dollars In Annual Funding To Conduct FORCED INSPECTIONS of American Homes
This is "not" a voluntary program! Home inspectors are to identify the individuals to be inspected and intervene so as to meet the improvement benchmarks. A family may be subject to intervention because they contain a current or former member of the armed forces, or because they are a low-income family, or because they have children with low student achievement. A homeschooling family may be subject to intervention in school readiness and social-emotional developmental indicators. A farm family may be subject to intervention in order to prevent child injuries. The sky is the limit. Inspectors are to take note of firearms in the home. The information compiled during forced inspections will be logged into a database that can then be used to mandate behavioral changes or to identify weapons owners, leading to a confiscation of firearms!


From Heil Hitler! To Heil Obama!: Obamacare Provides Millions of Dollars In Annual Funding To Conduct FORCED INSPECTIONS of American Homes

Obamacare Contains Forced Inspection Provision

August 19, 2013 by Bob Livingston -- Personal Liberty Digest

A provision in Obamacare provides millions of dollars in annual funding for State inspectors to conduct forced visits on homes with what the government deems is "high-risk" behaviors.

Among the high-risk behaviors listed are:

  • Families residing in communities identified by States as needing services to improve parenting and improved child care.
  • Low-income families.
  • Families with a pregnant woman or girl under age 21.
  • Families with a history of substance abuse.
  • Families containing tobacco users.
  • Families with children with low student achievement.
  • Families with children with disabilities.
  • Families with a current or former member of the armed forces.
  • Families with a history of child abuse or neglect.

So the Federal government is going to pay for an army of social workers to visit homes looking for "unapproved" high-risk behavior. Two items on the list are especially disquieting because, when combined with a 2006 Health and Human Services publication Child Neglect: A Guide for Prevention, Assessment, and Intervention, we learn that inspectors conducting a risk assessment are to take note of firearms in the home.

The information compiled during forced inspections will be logged into a database. Database information can then be used to mandate behavioral changes or to identify weapons owners, leading to a confiscation of firearms.

Constitutional attorney and author Kent Masterson Brown states: "This is not a voluntary program. The eligible entity receiving the grant for performing the home visits is to identify the individuals to be visited and intervene so as to meet the improvement benchmarks. A homeschooling family, for instance, may be subject to intervention in school readiness and social-emotional developmental indicators. A farm family may be subject to intervention in order to prevent child injuries. The sky is the limit."





Is Obama or Harrison J. Bounel Currently The President of The United States of America?: According to the 2009 tax return submitted by President Barrack Obama, Harrison J. Bounel is the Presidentís name
The U.S. Supreme Court was scheduled to hear a case in February, 2013 that contends that Obamaís birth certificate, Social Security number, Selective Service registration, etc. are fakes or forgeries. Evidence in the case includes a certified copy of the passport records of Obamaís mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, showing her sonís legal†last name to be Soebarkah, not Obama; Obamaís school records from Indonesia showing his citizenship to be Indonesian; sworn affidavits of top law enforcement experts & investigators showing Obamaís birth certificate & Selective Service certificate are forgeries and that the Social Security number used by Obama on his 2009 tax returns was fraudulent. Obama also defaulted in another court case on 01-30-13 that involves Obamaís phony SSN.


Is Obama or Harrison J. Bounel Currently The President of The United States of America?: According to the 2009 tax return submitted by President Barrack Obama, Harrison J. Bounel is the Presidentís name

President Harrison J. Bounel

February 15, 2013 by Bob Livingston  -- Personal Liberty Digest

Who is Harrison J. Bounel? According to the 2009 tax return submitted by President Barack Obama, heís the President of the United States. All nine U.S. Supreme Court Justices are scheduled to discuss this anomaly today.

The case in question is Edward Noonan, et al v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State, and the Justices are finally looking at it thanks to the dogged determination of Orly Taitz. The case calls into question many of the documents Obama (Bounel, Soetoro, Soebarkah, etc.) has used and/or released as authentic since he came on the national scene. The case contends that the documents ó birth certificate, Social Security number, Selective Service registration, etc. ó are fakes or forgeries. If thatís the case, Obama should not have been on the California ballot in 2008 and, therefore, should not have received the Stateís electoral votes.

Four of the nine Justices must vote to move the case forward. Weíll see.

Meantime, on Feb. 4, Kathleen OíLeary, presiding judge of the 4th District Court of Appeal, reinstated the appeal of Taitz v. Obama et al filed by Taitz when she ran for Senate. That case involves evidence of 1.5 million invalid voter registrations in the State of California. The appeal also involves Obamaís lack of legitimacy to hold the office of President based on his forged IDs, stolen Connecticut Social Security number, the fact the last name heís using is not legally his and his fraudulent claim to be the U.S. citizen.

Evidence in the case includes:

  • A certified copy of the passport records of Obamaís mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, showing her sonís legal last name to be Soebarkah, not Obama.
  • Obamaís school records from Indonesia, showing his citizenship to be Indonesian.
  • Sworn affidavits of top law enforcement experts and investigators, showing Obamaís birth certificate and Selective Service certificate are forgeries and that the Social Security number used by Obama on his 2009 tax returns as posted on WhiteHouse.gov was fraudulent. (The SSN failed when checked through both E-Verify and the Social Security Number Verification Service.)

On another legal front, Obama defaulted in the case of Grinols et al v. Obama et al on Jan. 30 when he failed to file a response within 21 days of being served notice of the suit. This case also involves Obamaís phony SSN.

The suit states:

[I]nvestigator Albert Hendershot found in the database of http://www.acxiom.com/identity-solutions/acxiom-identity-batch-solutions/ the name of the individual whose Social Security Obama is using. Acxciom-batch-solutions showed (Exhibit 1) that Harry J Bounel with the same Social Security number xxx-xx-4425 at 5046 S Greenwood Ave in Chicago, home address of Barack Obama, Database shows Bounel with the same address and Social Security number as Barack Obama himself. According to the databases last changes to the information on Harrison (Harry) J Bounel were made in and around November 2009 by Michelle Obama, who is listed as Bounelís relative. Database changes can involve entering the information or deletion of information. It appears that changes made by relative Michelle Obama included deletion of information, which was done at a time when Taitz brought to Federal court in the Central District of California before Judge David O. Carter a case of election challenge by her client, former U.S. ambassador Dr. Alan Keyes and 40 state Representatives and high ranked members of the U.S. military.

Recently obtained results of the 1940 census, Exhibit 2, provided the last missing link, link (sic) between Harry J. Bounel and the date of birth of 1890.  Exhibit 2 shows the printout of the U.S. census, showing Harry J Bounel, immigrant from Russia, residing at 915 Daly Ave, Bronx, NY, age 50 during the 1940 census, meaning he was born in 1890, as shown in the affidavit of Investigators Daniels and Sankey.

There is a pattern of Obstruction of Justice and tampering with the official records and falsification/forgery of the official records related to Obama. This happens in particular when [George W.] Bush employees leave their positions and are replaced by Obama appointees.

Taitz has asked for expedited default judgment and post judgment discovery in this case out of fear that any records on hand at the Social Security office will be destroyed when George W. Bush-appointed Commissioner Michael Astrue leaves office in February. Records that might have proven Obamaís Selective Service registration was a forgery were destroyed in 2009 after Bush-appointed Selective Service Director William Chatfield resigned, Taitz alleges.





"Average" Government Employees Are The True Privileged Class That Is Straining Taxpayers To The Breaking Point and Bankrupting The U.S. Economy With Their Outrageously Rich and Excessive Retirement Plans
Watch this video as Wayne Allyn Root reports on the true 1 percent: government employees. This is the privileged class that is straining taxpayers to the breaking point and bankrupting the U.S. economy. Will you retire with $5 million to $10 million? "Average" government employees are doing it every day.


"Average" Government Employees Are The True Privileged Class That Is Straining Taxpayers To The Breaking Point and Bankrupting The U.S. Economy With Their Outrageously Rich and Excessive Retirement Plans

Watch this video as Wayne Allyn Root reports on the true 1 percent: government employees. This is the privileged class that is straining taxpayers to the breaking point and bankrupting the U.S. economy. Will you retire with $5 million to $10 million? "Average" government employees are doing it every day.

Click here to watch this video and to understand the greatest scam since Bernie Madoff: http://personalliberty.com/2012/03/01/government-employees-the-true-1/





The Crony Super-Rich Are In Bed With The Greatest Fraud Of All Time: Obama, The Crony Socialist. They Have Teamed Up To Destroy The Middle Class and Small Business To Socialize/Communize America and Create Obamaís Cradle-To-Grave Welfare State
Obamaís goal is to create 2 classes of Americans: the super-rich [who support & contribute to Obama, who then rewards them with bribes, stimulus $, bailouts & government contracts] and the poor [who loyally vote for Obama to receive the handouts they need to survive]. Obama knows that the middle class & small business must be destroyed, and that the poor must be kept in their place dependent upon him. Obama is at war with small-business owners because they fund his political opposition; and Obama knows that small-business is where he must tax/steal more money since there arenít enough of the super-rich to pay for all of his treacherous, tyrannical plans to destroy America and the American Dream.


The Crony Super-Rich Are In Bed With The Greatest Fraud Of All Time: Obama, The Crony Socialist. They Have Teamed Up To Destroy The Middle Class and Small Business To Socialize/Communize America and Create Obamaís Cradle-To-Grave Welfare State

Obama Teams Up With Big Business To Destroy Middle Class

January 10, 2013 by Wayne Allyn Root -- Personal Liberty Digest

Watch the video here -- http://personalliberty.com/2013/01/10/obama-teams-up-with-big-business-to-destroy-middle-class/ -- or read the text of it below.

Hello, Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. Letís get to the story of Obama, the ultimate crony socialist teaming up with big business to wipe out small business and the middle class.

Iíve said it before; Iíll prove it again. President Barack Obama is a unique breed of socialist. He is a hybrid socialist/fascist. He understands that he needs "cover" to destroy America. He needs the support of famous billionaires like Warren Buffett and credible fat cat corporate CEOs like Jeffrey Immelt of GE to convince the masses that he is not out to destroy capitalism. He needs to show that rich people are on his side, that these rich guys agree with him that tax increases on the rich are "fair."

And the rich fat cats of big business will be glad to help him, as long as they share in the spoils. Theyíll be glad to pay an extra $100,000 a year in taxes as long as long as Obama spreads the wealth around Ė to them. As long as he hands them billion-dollar tax credits, stimulus, bailouts, government contracts, corporate welfare and loopholes big enough to drive an 18-wheeler through.

Thatís exactly whatís happening in America today. The super rich and the big corporations have teamed up with Obama and his socialist cabal to wipe out the middle class, upper middle class and small business. Theyíre doing it with taxes, rules, regulations and mandates. Obama claims theyíre aimed at the rich, but in reality they are aimed squarely at the middle class, upper middle class and small business.

Big business loves taxes, rules and regulations because they have the lobbyists and armies of lawyers and accountants to either avoid it, shelter it or deal with it all. But small business doesnít. So the competition of big business gets put out of business.

Obama, on the other hand, has many reasons for targeting small business. First, he knows thatís where the money is. Thatís where he will get the bulk of his massive tax increases. There arenít enough billionaires or $100 million men to pay for all of Obamaís plans. He needs trillions of dollars to create his cradle-to-grave welfare state.

Thatís where small business comes in. There are several million taxpayers in America who make $250,000 to $500,000 per year. Almost every one of them owns a business. Iím one of them. We are the target. These are the independent thinkers. These are the self-made capitalist evangelists. These are the stubborn, principled fiscal conservatives who despise Obama and his plans for equality, social justice and income redistribution. Small business makes up the heart of the resistance.

Secondly, small-business owners fund Obamaís political opposition. We make most of the contributions that fund conservative candidates and causes. Small business will never sell out conservative fiscal principles. Never. So Obama is at war with small business. He canít win without confiscating our money and getting us under his thumb.

Besides, what does Obama care about a $250,000-per-year small-restaurant owner? That person is insignificant to him. But the CEO of a billion-dollar conglomerate is very significant to Obama. That company can write $100,000 or $1 million checks to Obamaís campaign or his inauguration or the Democratic National Committee or an Obama-supporting PAC. And that Fortune 500 company has teams of lawyers and lobbyists, all willing to write big fat checks.

The ground has shifted in America. There used to be a team fighting for conservative fiscal principles. Wal-Mart, Wall Street, big banks and most of corporate America partnered with small business to support capitalism, conservative candidates and causes. Today, thereís been a sea change. A divorce. A "War of the Roses." Big business and corporate America have sold out to Obama. They couldnít care less about small business, or capitalism or conservative fiscal values. They arenít capitalists anymore; they are crony capitalists.

And they are in bed with Obama, the worldís biggest crony socialist.

It started with the bailouts and stimulus. Big business begged, lobbied and received billions of dollars. Small business got the shaft. All we got only the bill. Itís our kids and grandkids who will still be paying the interest on bailouts and wasted stimulus generations from now. Wall Street cheered as the stock market soared. But for small business down on Main Street, itís been a Great Depression for four years under Obama. Small business is dying.

The irony is that small business creates most of the jobs. Since the first day of the Ronald Reagan Presidency, about 40 million jobs have been created in America. The entire net of 40 million jobs was created by small business.

But small business owners donít have lobbyists or connected Washington, D.C. law firms. We canít afford to each give millions of dollars to politicians, so we get shafted. Look around the room. If you canít tell who the sucker is, itís you. Small business is the odd man out. We are the sucker. We are the target of Obama and his socialist cabal and now his newest partners in crime: big business.

Then came Fed policies. Obama orders the Fed to print trillions of fake dollars to keep the economy afloat. Where does it all go? To big business. To banks. To Wall Street. To publicly traded multinational companies. None of it has ever reached Main Street.

Then came Obamacare. I never in a million years imagined big business would support Obamaís big government, nanny state healthcare scheme. Back in the 1980s, big business teamed with small business to stop Bill and Hillary Clintonís attempt to socialize medicine and put government in charge of the entire healthcare system. Not this time.

This time, big business took Obamaís side. Health insurance and Big Pharma were bribed with billions of dollars in new revenues sent their way. The rest of big business went along with Obama because he promised them lower corporate taxes.

Then came the coup de grace: the so-called "fiscal cliff" crisis. Small-business owners pay their taxes as individuals. They own Subchapter S and LLC corporations that pass all income down to the individual small-business owner. The lawyers and lobbyists of big business saw an opening. The goal was simple: Ask small-business owners who file individual taxes (mom-and-pop stores that create all the new jobs) to pay dramatically higher taxes and lose valuable deductions (like charitable and mortgage deductions), so that big corporations (many of which move jobs offshore and keep billions of dollars of profits parked offshore too) could dramatically reduce their taxes.

The Wall Street Journal reported on groups like the Business Roundtable (made up of 150 corporate titans) and the RATE Coalition (AT&T, Ford, Lockheed Martin, Home Depot) publicly endorsing and blessing big tax hikes on mom-and-pop America.

The $625 billion tax increase passed. Big business didnít get their corporate tax cutÖ yet. But boy did they get goodies: $40 billion in crony capitalism payoffs. The new tax bill gives away $78 million in tax breaks to benefit NASCAR, $62 million in tax credits for companies operating in American Samoa, $222 million of tax rebates to rum companies, $430 million in tax rebates for Hollywood film producers, $12 billion (with a "B") in tax credits for wind power phonies like GE, $2.2 billion to renewable diesel companies, $650 million to manufacturers of energy-efficient appliances and $222 million in accelerated tax depreciation for businesses located on Indian reservations. Many of these companies will pay no taxes at all because of these rebates and credits.

Mom-and-pop small businesses just had their income redistributed to Big Business. Billion-dollar companies ripped off small businesses on Main Street under the guise of a "fiscal cliff." If we were on a cliff, how could we afford to give $430 million to Hollywood film producers? This was the greatest swindle since Bernie Madoff.

I predict this was only the start of Obamaís payoff to corporate America. I guarantee you that Obama told the corporate lobbyists that heíll give them $40 billion in tax credit gifts now. So be patient and wait for 2013, when we will implement serious "tax reform." Thatís code words for fleecing small business and middle America again. This means even higher taxes and more loss of deductions for individuals, in return for "tax reform" that dramatically cuts corporate tax rates. Anyone want to bet?

Itís all part of the Andrew Cloward and Frances Fox Piven plan. Build an alliance with big business to fund your plan to overwhelm the system and socialize America.

Obamaís big government, socialist agenda isnít aimed at the super rich. Thatís just a head fake to cover the truth. Thatís just the propaganda he uses to sell his con game to the masses. Obamaís destructive agenda is aimed squarely at you: entrepreneurs, small-business owners and the middle class.

Obamaís goal is to create two classes of Americans: the super rich (who support and contribute to Obama, who then rewards them with bribes, stimulus, bailouts and government contracts) and the poor (who loyally vote for Obama to receive the handouts they need to survive). In Obamaís view of America, the middle class and small business must be destroyed, and the poor must be kept in their place (that place is hopeless, helpless and dependent on him).

The cat is out of the bag. The crony capitalists are in bed with the greatest fraud of all time: Obama, the crony socialist.

Itís now every man for himself.

Thatís my commentary for today. Bad things are happening in America under Obama. If you are middle class, upper middle class or a business owner, your livelihood and quality of life are in danger. Your childrenís future is in danger. The American Dream is on life support.

Iíll see you next week. Same time, same place. Right here at PersonalLiberty.com. God Bless.





Unimaginable Until Obama Came Along: America is being destroyed from within. Who needs terrorists? Obamaís plan is so much more efficient
The murder of Christians in Egypt by the Muslim Brotherhood does not upset Obama but he is so mortified when radical Muslims murder other radical Muslims in Syria that he wants America to go to war and risk starting World War III. Obama quickly weighs in on white-on-black crime yet says nothing about black-on-black genocide or the out-of-control black-on-white crime wave in America. America is broke yet we have tens of millions of dollars for Obamaís vacations. Obama arms Muslim rebels, but he wants to disarm American citizens. Obama spends millions of taxpayer dollars for advertising in Mexico telling illegal aliens in America they are eligible for food stamps. Obama pays commissions to recruiters to inform Americans it is their patriotic duty to sign up for food stamps. Obamacare guarantees there are no full-time high-paying jobs in America anymore.


Unimaginable Until Obama Came Along: America is being destroyed from within. Who needs terrorists? Obamaís plan is so much more efficient.

White House Down

September 5, 2013 by Wayne Allyn Root -- Personal Liberty Digest

Watch the video here -- http://personalliberty.com/2013/09/05/white-house-down/ -- or read the text of it below.

Hello. Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. Have you seen the movies "White House Down" or "Olympus Has Fallen"? These movies are about terrorists taking over the White House and kidnapping the President. But Barack Obama proves you donít need Russia or China or North Korea or radical Muslim terrorists to take down the White House and destroy the Presidency. Obama is doing it all by himself.

At Columbia University (class of í83), my fellow classmates admitted they hated America, hated "the rich" and despised Judeo-Christian values. We spent our days discussing and debating their plan to destroy capitalism and radically change America from within by electing one of their own to the Presidency. Once elected, the plan was to overwhelm the system with spending, taxes, entitlements and debt. Capitalism would topple, business owners would lose everything and Americans would be brought to their knees, begging for government to save them. In that way America would become a socialist Nation.

Obama was one of my Columbia classmates, and it is clear now this is the very plan heís implementing. With economic and moral carnage from coast to coast and now throughout the Mideast, it is clear the White House is down and Olympus has fallen Ė from within.

Just look at the facts:

In Egypt, 70 churches have been burned and many Christians killed by the Muslim Brotherhood, yet Obama says nothing. As a matter of fact, Obamaís White House spokesman made a joke about the killing of Christians in Egypt.

While the murder of Christians does not pass any "red line," Obama is mortified when radical Muslims murder other radical Muslims in Syria. That passes Obamaís "red line" and triggers a desperate desire for America to go to war, spend billions of dollars we donít have, risk the lives of our children to defend our sworn enemy, al-Qaida and risk starting World War III.

Unimaginable. Until Obama came along.

When George Zimmerman was found innocent of the death of Trayvon Martin, Obama quickly weighed in. Yet our President says nothing about the black-on-black genocide in the streets of Chicago (his hometown) or about the out-of-control black-on-white crime wave happening across America. Just recently, a white Australian baseball player was murdered by black youths in Oklahoma; a white 88-year-old World War II veteran was murdered by black youths in Spokane, Wash.; a 1-year-old baby was shot and killed in his stroller during a mugging by black youths in Georgia; and 12 black youths participated in a brutal gang rape in a Wilmington, Del., park. Iím waiting for Obama to call a press conference and say: "These two women gang raped by black youths in that park could have been my daughters. This violence by black youths must stop." I fear Iíll be waiting forÖ eternity.

After all, this is the same President whose Equal Employment Opportunity Commission recently ruled that it is racist for employers to conduct criminal background checks on black job applicants because they might find out the applicant is a criminal. But the EEOC says itís fine to do criminal background checks for white job applicants.

Unimaginable. Until Obama came along.

Under Obama, our Nation is so broke we no longer have the money for White House tours or to properly staff air traffic controller towers or to keep open our Top Gun training for Navy fighter pilots or to keep illegal immigrant felons behind bars or to keep pools open for military families. We even canceled fireworks displays at military bases. Weíre that broke as a Nation.

Yet somehow we have tens of millions of dollars so our President can vacation in Hawaii and Marthaís Vineyard and go on countless golf outings. We somehow have $100 million for him and his family to take a trip to Africa, where he pledged $7 billion of our money to provide electricity for the citizens of Africa. Where did that $7 billion come from? And what about the millions of dollars for the Internal Revenue Service to spend on lavish conferences and the billions of dollars Obama is giving the Palestinians and the Muslim Brotherhood.

Oh, and donít forget the money Obama has spent to arm al-Qaida and Hezbollah rebels in Libya and Syria, who will later use these same weapons to kill us. Actually, they already have. (See Benghazi.) They raped and murdered our own ambassador while using our weapons. Now Obama wants us to fight on their side in Syria.

Unimaginable. Until Obama came along.

Amazingly, while he arms Muslim rebels, our President wants to disarm American citizens. Funny, huh? But even that pales next to the shocking militarization of our own government agencies. Under Obama, the Agriculture Department and the Department of Education now have militarized SWAT teams. Homeland Security just bought 1.6 billion rounds of hollow point bullets ó enough to fight 30 yearsí of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. Does Obama fear his own citizens?

Unimaginable. Until Obama came along.

In California, Democrats have proposed a bill to allow illegal aliens to serve on juries. Obama spends millions of our taxpayer dollars for advertising in Mexico telling illegal aliens in America they are eligible for food stamps. Billions of dollars in welfare payments are given to illegal aliens, disguised as "earned tax credits" ó even though they pay no taxes in the first place. Our government pays commissions to "recruiters" to inform Americans it is their "patriotic duty" to sign up for food stamps.

Unimaginable. Until Obama came along.

Obama hands out free "Obamaphones." The catch is they are all bugged. Big Brother listens to your every word.

Unimaginable. Until Obama came along.

And then thereís Obamacare. Itís such a train wreck even Obamaís most loyal supporters ó unions ó want no part of it. The head of the IRS testified he wants no part of it. Even the company Obama hired to promote Obamacare relies on part-time workers with no health benefits. Fast-food restaurants are partnering to share part-time workers, so no one falls under Obamacare. Obamacare guarantees there are no full-time high-paying jobs in America anymore. Economic disaster looms.

Unimaginable. Until Obama came along.

None of this should come as a surprise. Remember Democratic delegates booed God three times at Obamaís Presidential convention. And only days ago in Iowa, a Democratic activist opened a meeting with prayer, thanking God for the "blessing" of abortion. You canít make this stuff up.

Yes, my fellow Americans, the White House is down, Olympus has fallen and America is being destroyed from within. Who needs terrorists? Obamaís plan is so much more efficient.





Obama Voters Suffer Most Under Obama Economy: So Much For Hope and Change.
The 5 demographic groups Obama carried and the percentage that voted for him in 2012 were youths (60%), single women (67%), blacks (93%), Hispanics (71%), and those without a high school diploma (64%). Households headed by single women have seen their incomes fall by 7 percent, and those under age 25 have seen their incomes drop 9.6 percent. The incomes for black heads-of-household have dropped by 10.9 percent, and Hispanic heads-of-household have seen theirs drop 4.5 percent. For those with a high school diploma or less, incomes dropped 8 percent. Female heads of household saw their annual salaries drop by $2,300. Black-led households saw their annual salaries drop by more than $4,000, and Hispanic-led households saw their annual salaries drop $2,000. Only 43.7 percent of the eligible population is employed.


Obama Voters Suffer Most Under Obama Economy: So Much For Hope and Change.

Obama Voters Suffer Most Under Obama Economy

September 6, 2013 by Bob Livingston -- Personal Liberty Digest

The cynic might say that President Barack Obama is pushing to make war on Syria to distract Americans from the myriad scandals swirling around his Administration and/or his failed efforts at economic recovery. But while there are deeper issues behind the push to war (which we have been and will continue to explore elsewhere), war talk has served to push big issues to the back pages.

For instance, recovery summer never materialized ó not in 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 or 2013 ó despite predictions by Obama and Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke. And guess whoís hurt the most by Obamaís policies. Itís Obamaís core demographic.

Obama received 51 percent of the vote in 2012. The five demographic groups he carried and the percentage that voted for him were youths (60 percent), single women (67 percent), blacks (93 percent), Hispanics (71 percent), and those without a high school diploma (64 percent).

According to a report by Sentier Research, since recovery summer was announced in 2009, households headed by single women have seen their incomes fall by 7 percent, and those under age 25 have seen their incomes drop 9.6 percent.

The incomes for black heads-of-household have dropped by 10.9 percent, and Hispanic heads-of-household have seen theirs drop 4.5 percent. For those with a high school diploma or less, incomes dropped 8 percent. (Incomes fell 6.9 percent for those with less than a high school diploma and 9.3 percent for those with one.)

In dollar terms, female heads of household saw their annual salaries drop by $2,300. Black-led households saw their annual salaries drop by more than $4,000, and Hispanic-led households saw their annual salaries drop $2,000.

Gallup released its monthly Payroll-to-Population survey yesterday. It showed that only 43.7 percent of the eligible population is employed, and it pegged unemployment at 8.7 percent. In 2012, those numbers were 45.3 percent and 8.1 percent.

So much for hope and change.





Obama Wants A War! Obama Is Desperate To Keep His Own Voters From Noticing He Is The Worst Thing To Happen To Them In Their Lifetimes. Obama, Mao Zedong, Josef Stalin, Fidel Castro, Huto Chavez. Same people. Same policies. Same results. They always hurt the masses. They always victimize their own voters. They always hurt the ones they claim to love. A sick, dysfunctional death spiral
So what does Obama, who couldnít find a job if it hit him in the head, do to keep the masses of his own voters from revolting & rioting in the streets?†Go to war! Create a distraction & patriotism that make the masses rally around him. Help unemployment by sending unemployed young people & minorities off to die in war. Starting a war is Obamaís desperate attempt to keep his most loyal supporters from noticing that his policies have ruined their lives and set their economic progress back decades. His policies have sent black Americans in particular hurtling back to the days of poverty and racial inequality.


Obama Wants A War! Obama Is Desperate To Keep His Own Voters From Noticing He Is The Worst Thing To Happen To Them In Their Lifetimes. Obama, Mao Zedong, Josef Stalin, Fidel Castro, Huto Chavez. Same people. Same policies. Same results. They always hurt the masses. They always victimize their own voters. They always hurt the ones they claim to love. A sick, dysfunctional death spiral.

The Damage Obama Has Done To Black Americans

September 12, 2013 by Wayne Allyn Root -- Personal Liberty Digest 

Watch the video here -- http://personalliberty.com/2013/09/12/the-damage-obama-has-done-to-black-americans/ -- or read the text of it below.

Hello, Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. Iíve written many times here about what President Barack Obama is doing to the U.S. economy, to business owners, to Americans in general. But today I will look at what Obama is doing to black Americans and his own most loyal supporters. It is, in a word: unimaginable.

It all starts with Syria. Why Syria? Why now? Until Russia interceded, going to war in Syria seemed the most important thing in the world to Obama and his Secretary of State, John Kerry. They seemed desperate to go to war, at any costs.

But why? Syria has nothing to do with us. It is not threatening us. Its own war is a civil war with no "good guys." How does America benefit from a war with Syria? Why did Obama suddenly decide a "red line" has been crossed when there are "red lines" all over the world, including the killing of Christians and the burning of 71 Christian churches in Egypt. Why is it so important to risk American lives to defend the Syrian rebels who are partners with al-Qaida, Americaís sworn enemy? We didnít go to war to avenge the murder of our own citizens at Benghazi, Libya, so why would we go to war to avenge al-Qaida deaths in Syria?

None of this makes any sense at all ó until you realize itís a massive cover-up: Obamaís WMD, weapon of mass distraction. Obama is desperate to cover up the facts about his dying economy and the damage heís done to his own most loyal voters. Obama has destroyed the lives of the very people who consider him "the American idol."

How bad is Obamaís economy? Forget the 7.3 percent unemployment rate that is reported by the government. Thatís pure fraud and propaganda. That figure goes down only because hundreds of thousands of Americans drop out of the workforce. In other words, if you stop looking for work and go on food stamps and welfare, Obama says the unemployment number just got better.

The only truth about unemployment is found in the labor force participation rate of 63 percent. Thatís the lowest in four decades. For men, itís the lowest since record-keeping began in the 1940s. What this means is 37 percent of the able-bodied, working-age adults in America are not only not working, theyíve given up looking for work.

Even worse, an unimaginable percentage of those who are employed have only part-time jobs. Seventy-seven percent of the new jobs created since Jan. 1 are part-time jobs. Thatís not good, folks. Studies show one in four part-time workers live in poverty, while only one in 20 full-time workers live in poverty. So millions of Americans under Obama who show up as "employed" are merely working their way toward poverty. And millions of others who have full-time jobs are working at McDonalds or are working as waiters or bartenders or janitors. Those are the only jobs left under Obama. The middle class is being slaughtered.

Here are the two most ironic points about this slow-motion train wreck called the Obama economy. Obamacare is the No. 1 culprit destroying real jobs. Business owners are done. No smart business owner in all of America will lift a finger to create a full-time, high-paying job with benefits. It just makes no economic sense anymore. So Obamaís signature achievement has not only created a part-time economy, but all those people in part-time jobs donít have health insurance. This should be a "Saturday Night Live" skit. The man has created nationalized healthcare so that everyone loses his job and no one has health care. Insanity ó unless your goal is to create an entire Nation of Americans living in poverty, dependent on government welfare.

Secondly, hereís the really sad, tragic and ironic fact of the Obama economy. Obama hurts the ones he loves. Obamaís policies are destroying the very people who elected and believed in him. Itís almost as if Obama is out to destroy his own voters. Letís take a look at who is suffering the most from this Obama Great Depression.

Obama won the 2012 election with a razor-thin 51 percent of the vote. His biggest supporters were blacks (93 percent voted for Obama), Hispanics (71 percent), single women (67 percent), young people (60 percent) and those without a high school diploma (64 percent). This is the loyal foundation of Barack Hussein Obama. This is who made him President, without a single qualification except being a community organizer.

Now, letís look at how Obama repays his loyal fans. New research out just last week proves that since 2009, income for black heads of households dropped by 10.9 percent. For Hispanic heads of households, it dropped by 4.5 percent. For single women head of households, it dropped by 7 percent. For young people (under age 25), it dropped by 9.6 percent. For those with a high school diploma or less, income dropped by 8 percent.

In dollar terms the numbers are even worse. Female incomes are down by $2,300 per year under Obama. Black incomes are down more than $4,000 per year. Hispanic incomes are down by $2,000 per year.

How about actual unemployment figures for Obamaís fans? We see the same results. Reported unemployment (a bogus figure) is 7.3 percent. But among blacks (93 percent of whom voted for Obama), it is an unimaginable 13.3 percent. Among Hispanics, itís 9.4 percent. Among black youths, itís 20.9 percent. Among teens, itís 23.7 percent.

The black middle class is being destroyed. Black homeownership has slipped to the lowest level in decades.

But the worst statistic of all is the unemployment, plus underemployment, rate for college graduates under age 25: 18.3 percent. That means new college graduates (also big supporters of Obama) canít find a decent full-time job in the Obama economy; at the same time, they are saddled with the highest student debt in history. That could be why we have the highest student loan default rates in history.

So what does a President, who couldnít find a job if it hit him in the head, do to keep the masses of his own voters from revolting and rioting in the streets? Go to war.

Create a distraction. Make people look away from the scene of the tragedy. Create a "situation" that induces patriotism. Make the masses rally around the President. And if that "situation" happens to help unemployment by sending unemployed young people and minorities off to war, bingo! Youíve just hit the lottery.

That is the answer to the questions: Why Syria? Why now? How does this benefit America?

Obamaís war is a desperate attempt to keep his own most loyal supporters from noticing that his policies have ruined their lives and set their economic progress back decades. His policies have sent black Americans in particular hurtling back to the days of poverty and racial inequality.

Obama is desperate to keep his own voters from noticing he is the worst thing to happen to them in their lifetimes. His socialist policies donít solve poverty, they cause poverty. And itís no surprise. Socialism, income redistribution, big taxes, big spending, big unions and big government have caused poverty in every nation theyíve ever been tried. Obama, Mao Zedong, Josef Stalin, Fidel Castro, Huto Chavez. Same people. Same policies. Same results. They always hurt the masses. They always victimize their own voters. They always hurt the ones they claim to love. A sick, dysfunctional death spiral.

Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. Same time, same place. God bless America and God bless capitalism. Itís time to fight for them both.





Obama Administration Delays Key Directive of Obamacare Until 2015 In Order To Avoid Losing Votes In The Mid-Term Elections In 2014: Obama does not want to become a lame-duck President because of imminent & massive Obamacare shock and outrage

Obama Administration Delays Key Directive of Obamacare Until 2015 In Order To Avoid Losing Votes In The Mid-Term Elections In 2014: Obama does not want to become a lame-duck President because of imminent & massive Obamacare shock and outrage

 

Employers with more than 50 employees now have until 2015 to provide health insurance coverage under Obamacare. Why? Because Obama knows that Obamacare is going to create massive shock & outrage and that angry voters would be extremely disgusted with his political party at the mid-term elections in 2014. Obama does not want to risk being a lame duck President for his last two years in office by losing seats in the House and Senate. This delay was not really intended to help employers and employees, but to help Obama. Nothing new here since Obamaís history shows that he puts himself and his destroy America agenda above the best interests of the country.





17 Pieces of Evidence That The U.S. Government Under Obama Is A Criminal Enterprise That Is Out Of Control And Poised To Explode: That Obamaís personal background is likely fake and that Chief Justice John Roberts was likely blackmailed to rule in favor of Obamacare are just two examples of this evidence
Law enforcement agents and computer experts have evidence that Obamaís purported birth certificate is a computer-generated fakery. His Selective Service registration is a forgery and contains a fabricated Postal stamp. Obama is using a Social Security number that belongs to a man named Harrison J. Bounel. Despite being in possession of this information and other information about Obamaís fake narrative, neither the courts nor Congress will act on it. Also, itís likely that Chief Justice John Roberts, who switched his vote in the final minutes before the Supreme Court released its Obamacare decision, did so because he was blackmailed over the illegal adoption of his children.


17 Pieces of Evidence That The U.S. Government Under Obama Is A Criminal Enterprise That Is Out Of Control And Poised To Explode: That Obamaís personal background is likely fake and that Chief Justice John Roberts was likely blackmailed to rule in favor of Obamacare are just two examples of this evidence

More Evidence That The U.S. Government Is A Criminal Enterprise

July 15, 2013 by Bob Livingston -- Personal Liberty Digest 

The U.S. government is a criminal enterprise and is out of control. The U.S. Constitution was drafted to limit government and affirm the natural rights held by the people, but it is serially ignored and violated by the President, the Congress, the Supreme Court and law enforcers both Federal and local.

The result is growing tyranny and a police state and a Nation that is becoming a simmering cauldron of unrest ó sparked by the passage of unConstitutional laws by a Congress controlled by moneyed interests; the affirming of those laws by the Supreme Court; long-term high rates of unemployment; a declining standard of living; increased regulation by unaccountable, bought-and-paid-for psychotic government functionaries; money printing; a presstitute mass media; increasingly militarized and militant local law enforcement officers; and a declining morality encouraged by both the political and celebrity classes ó that is poised to explode.

The elected class and their handlers have been at war with the American people, the Constitution and the American way of life for many years. In the beginning, they used gradualism to sneak small abuses by an unobservant public. But as the unConstitutional encroachments gained ground, they accelerated. We are now rapidly heading toward a calamitous event that will rock the system to its core and, hopefully, restore us to Constitutional governance.

Following are 17 pieces of evidence taken from local headlines that prove the President, Congress, Supreme Court, Federal and local police are criminals working against the interests and best wishes of the American people:

  • President Barack Obama has mandated that all Federal workers and contractors spy on one another. Under the program, which is being implemented with little public attention, security investigations can be launched when government employees showing "indicators of insider threat behavior" are reported by co-workers, according to previously undisclosed administration documents obtained by McClatchy. Investigations also can be triggered when "suspicious user behavior" is detected by computer network monitoring and reported to "insider threat personnel." The hypersensitive Obama instituted this spying program supposedly to spot leakers like Snowden and Pfc. Bradley Manning, who is charged with leaking state secrets to Wikileaks. But in reality, Obama is trying to reign in any chance of exposure of his and the rest of governmentís unConstitutional abuses of power.
  • U.S. Government contractor Edward Snowden recently "revealed" that the National Security Agency is illegally spying on American by collecting their emails, text messages, phone records and social networking posts. The mainstream media, the propaganda arm of the government, claims these revelations are new and startling, even though the information has been in the public domain for years and visible to anyone with a discerning mind. Whatís troubling is Snowdenís sketchy narrative and the way the sycophantic media ignores it. The sketchy narrative indicates there is something else going on behind the scenes that only the elites are privy to; and, in fact, it may very well be a turf war between two or more unaccountable government agencies.
  • The increased spying network is a result of the so-called "War on Terror" that was begun after the false flag 9/11 attacks. The Nationís security apparatus received a huge infusion of cash as a result so it could "keep Americans safe." Yet since then, almost all the "terrorists" captured attempting to attack the United States have been FBI-created patsies. Even The New York Times has admitted this.
  • Federal Reserve money printing, lately called Quantitative Easing, is propping up the stock market and benefiting the banksters and Wall Street while creating another bubble that will wipe out the American middle classÖ again. That will probably result in another fix like the last one in which President George W. Bush "abandoned free market principals to save the free market system." Such a pronouncement is classic Orwellian doublethink. In reality, there has not been a free market system for many years. Printing money so the banksters and Wall Street criminals can continue to pass it among themselves will lead to an inevitable collapse of the financial system.
  • The Internal Revenue Service is targeting Americans based on their political and religious beliefsÖ and will soon have access to everyoneís medical records ó another batch of information they can use against the people.
  • The tragically misnamed Patient Protection and Affordable Healthcare Act ó aka Obamacare ó is an unConstitutional monstrosity that was rammed through Congress against the wishes of a majority of the American people. Even though ruled Constitutional by the Supreme Court, the bill is clearly unConstitutional because of the individual mandate and because it violates the origination clause (Article I, Section 7) of the Constitution, which states that bills raising revenue must originate in the House. Now Obama is promising to act unConstitutionally by putting off requiring businesses comply with the law by the 2014 deadline (violating Article II, Section 3).
  • Itís likely that Chief Justice John Roberts, who switched his vote in the final minutes before the Supreme Court released its Obamacare decision, did so because he was blackmailed over the illegal adoption of his children.
  • Lost in the hoopla over the egregious and unConstitutional SCOTUS rulings on gay marriage and the George Zimmerman trial in Florida was this ruling by the Supreme Court: Drug companies are exempt from lawsuits involving fraud, mislabeling, side effects and accidental death. The court essentially put drug safety in the hands of the Food and Drug Administration, which is owned by Big Pharma and the medical cartel. So if the FDA says a drug is safe, pharmaceutical companies canít be sued even though many, if not most, FDA employees were first researchers and/or lobbyists for the same Big Pharma companies they are now approving drugs for.
  • Congress recently passed a law that pre-empted a court decision requiring biotech companies (Monsanto) get permission before selling and planting untested genetically modified crops. Dubbed by opponents as the Monsanto Protection Act, it demonstrates how Monsanto owns Congress.
  • The Obama Administration is stirring unrest throughout the Mideast and North Africa by arming and encouraging al-Qaida-affiliated terrorists ó who are using nerve gas, beheading citizens, shooting women, burning Christians and eating the hearts of their enemies ó to overthrow legitimate governments. Part of the gunrunning operation to al-Qaida terrorists resulted in the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya. There is still much to learn about the incident, but State Department employees, particularly former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, are lying and obfuscating in order to cover up the events of that day.
  • Attorney General Eric Holder armed Mexican narco-terrorists with weapons through the Operation Fast and Furious gunrunning operation and then lied to Congress about it. Meanwhile, Obama, Holder and Congressional gun grabbers are doing everything in their power to disarm Americans.
  • Obama has repeatedly ignored his requirement to get Congressional approval before making war on other countries, and Congress has made no effort to stop him.
  • Obama, supported by Holder, has decided that he can assassinate American citizens with drones. No trial or even evidence is required, and the decisions about who is murdered are made behind closed doors by the President and a group of his friends.
  • There is reasonable doubt that Obamaís "personal narrative" is true. Law enforcement agents and computer experts have evidence that Obamaís purported birth certificate is a computer-generated fakery. His Selective Service registration is a forgery and contains a fabricated Postal stamp. Obama is using a Social Security number that belongs to a man named Harrison J. Bounel. Despite being in possession of this information and other information about Obamaís fake narrative, neither the courts nor Congress will act on it.
  • Local police are now regularly beating, shocking with Tasers, arresting and shooting citizens who take video of police actions or invoke their rights against illegal search and seizure. For articles on some of the most egregious examples of police abuse, go here.
  • Members of the elected class are pathological liars. Case in point: When asked during a press conference last week about whether a delay in implementing the individual mandate had any virtue in light of the delay in implementing the employer mandate, former House Speaker and top Democrat Nancy Pelosi denied there was a delay in the mandate for businesses. "It was not a delay of the mandate for the businesses, and there shouldnít be a delay of the mandate for individuals," she insisted. This in spite of the fact that the Obama Administration just over a week earlier announced the delay, and it has been a topic of discussion since the announcement.
  • In a gross violation civilized protocol, the Obama Administration forced Americaís European puppet states France and Portugal to deny Bolivia President Evo Moralesí plane access to their airspace and the plane was forced to land in Austria where it was searched for accused leaker Snowden. It was a huge, but deserved, embarrassment for the Administration but probably did nothing to staunch efforts to continue to persecute the man a majority of Americans now view as a hero.

Time and space, not the lack of more examples, force me to end this column here. But I believe the point is made. My advice to you is to prepare for the storm to come with food, water, guns, ammo and gold on hand.





Is Obama A Secret Member of the Muslim Brotherhood That Attacks and Kills Christians? An Egyptian newspaper has a front page headline claiming Obama as a full-on member of Muslim Brotherhood international.
Egyptians are angry at Obama for not condemning and taking a stand against the Muslim Brotherhood and accuse Obama of being pro-Muslim Brotherhood. The truth is that Obama has come right to the edge of endorsing the Muslim Brotherhood. Obama congratulated the ISNA [Islamic Society of North America] telling the Muslim Brotherhood terror-linked front group, ďMy administration is proud to be your partner.Ē The attacking of Christians by those supported by Obama is nothing new. It happened in Egypt where the Muslim Brotherhood destroyed churches and persecuted Christians. Obama is attempting to drag America into another war in which some of those aided may bring terror to the United States in the future.


Is Obama A Secret Member of the Muslim Brotherhood That Attacks and Kills Christians? An Egyptian newspaper has a front page headline claiming Obama as a full-on member of Muslim Brotherhood international.

Is Obama A Secret Member Of The Muslim Brotherhood?

By John Myers -- 9-11-2013 --Personal Liberty Digest

It is a travesty that on the 12th anniversary of 9/11 President Barack Obama is poised to use our military to support Syrian rebels, many of whom pledge: "Death to America!"

Obama is prepared to take up arms against the Bashar Assad regime even though half of the anti-government rebels may be avid jihadists, some of whom have been busying themselves with SS-style executions of captured Syrian soldiers and attacks on Syrian Christians.

Last week, The Associated Press reported that "al-Qaida-linked fighters launched an assault on" the "Christian mountain village" of Maaloula, some 40 miles from Damascus. The rebels commandeered a mountaintop hotel and were shelling civilians, according to a nun who spoke on condition of anonymity.

Assadís army, as brutal as it may be, had been protecting the village, whose residents speak a version of Aramaic, an ancient language that Christ is believed to have spoken.

"The stones are shaking," a nun at Mar Takla told The AP. "We donít know if the rebels have left or not. Nobody dares go out."

The attacking of Christians by those supported by Obama is nothing new. It happened in Egypt. The recently overthrown Muslim Brotherhood destroyed churches and persecuted Christians. It is also an outspoken goal of some of the anti-Assad forces, including untold multitudes of al-Qaida affiliates that have entered the war and hail from as far away as Chechnya, the country of origin for the Boston bombers.

These are the same Syrian revolutionaries that Obama is risking world peace to defend with U.S. military might. The question we should ask is: Why? Some people within the Arab world think they know the answer, that Obama is a secret member of the Muslim Brotherhood.

So tweeted Shadi Hamid, director of research at the Brookings Center in Doha, Qatar.

If you missed it, "liberal" Egyptian newspaper has front page headline claiming Obama as full-on member of Muslim Brotherhood international.

ó Shadi Hamid (@shadihamid) September 1, 2013

The allegation was printed in Egyptian newspaper Al-Wafd.

"One could hardly come up with a more explosive allegation about a U.S. president than secret membership in an Islamist group," wrote The Blaze.

Jonathan Spyer, senior research fellow at the Global Research in International Affairs Center and an Arabic speaker, talked to The Blaze about Al-Wafdís allegation.

Spyer said Egyptians are angry at the Obama Administration for not taking a stand against the Muslim Brotherhood. "There is some degree of justification" in the accusation that Obama is pro-Muslim Brotherhood, according to Spyer, because the president has not condemned the group.

The truth is that Obama has come right to the edge of endorsing the Muslim Brotherhood. Last week, in a story titled "ĎMy Administration is Proud to be Your Partnerí, Obama Tells Muslim Brotherhood Pro-Hamas Group," Frontpage Mag wrote:

Obama taped a statement congratulating ISNA [Islamic Society of North America], an unindicted co-conspirator in the Hamas Holy Land funding case, on its anniversary, telling the Muslim Brotherhood terror-linked front group, "My administration is proud to be your partner."

ISNAís president had met twice with Obama and Valerie Jarrett, making this a high end meeting. And Jarrett had addressed the ISNA convention back in 2009.

"Muslim Americans are integral part of our character and history and we rely on your innovation and entrepreneurship to help keep moving this country forward," Obama told ISNA members. "Over the last half century, you have upheld the proud legacy of American Muslimsí contributions to our national fabric and this gathering is a testament of that tradition."

Many people maintain that the ISNA is a front organization for the Muslim Brotherhood.

Obamaís Ridiculous ĎRed Lineí Excuse

Obama could write a book: How to Win Enemies and Influence Jihadists. The President has not improved the situation in the Mideast. And, after all, the regionís continual turmoil stems largely from American policy toward Saudi Arabia and Israel. Obama is simply aggravating the situation by attempting to drag America into another war in which some of those aided may bring terror to the United States in the future.

In May, I quoted the President in Paving the Road to Ruin with Islamists:

"We will not tolerate the use of chemical weapons against the Syrian people." Those are the words from President Barack Obama. He also warned that if the regime in Syria is using chemical weapons, it will have "crossed a red line" creating a "game changer" for his Administration.

I added:

The reasoning goes in Washington that America must stop Islamic religious and tribal factions from killing each other. Yet three thoughts come to mind:

  1. Does America not have bigger national security problems, namely North Korea and its long-range missiles, which may already carry nuclear warheads?
  2. If Muslims are killing each other, the Muslim extremists may be too busy to kill us.
  3. How in the world can military intervention in the Mideast do anything other than make things worse?

I have not seen a good answer from the Obama Administration on these issues. What I have seen is an Administration with help from neocons in the Republican Party itching to help radical elements in Syria, come whatever may. To have it their way, they are harping on the use of chemical weapons in Syria, allegedly by Assad. The warmongers are now saying it was not the President who set the red line on their use; it was the world.

Secretary of State John Kerry recently stated: "This really is not President Obamaís red line. The president drew a line that anyone should draw with respect to this convention that we have signed up to, and which has been in place since the horrors of World War I."

Are you serious, Secretary Kerry? For someone who brags about his combat record in Vietnam and is a self-proclaimed "warrior," you seem to know little about the facts of that war, a war which you later so vehemently opposed.

Some 388,000 tons of napalm were dropped on targets in Vietnam by the Pentagon, resulting in the death of countless women and children. Since Vietnam, the use of napalm has been banned.

Prospect reported:

When the US used firebombs against Saddamís army in 2003, the Pentagon vociferously denied that it was napalm. It later explained it was another incendiary that did not yet have such a bad reputation.

In 2004, in Fallujah, Iraq, U.S. troops used white phosphorus against Iraqi insurgents. Only after the Pentagon was caught lying about its use did our government admit to it. That incident was documented in the Italian television report "Fallujah, The Hidden Massacre." The ghastly images include video and photographs of dead Iraqi civilians not so different from those used by the Obama Administration to build its case for war against the Assad regime.

Imagine how our government would have reacted had Russia called those incidents the crossing of a red line and lined up an attack fleet off our coast to punish the Bush Administration. It is an absurd notion, mostly because America is strong. However, Syria is weak.

Dispense with these inconvenient truths, say the neocon Republicans and the Obama Democrats. After all, Obama has a war to be waged and just perhaps a greater jihad to inspire.

Today is a sad day, my friends, not only because it is the anniversary of 9/11 but also because, at the very least, our President is a penny wise and a pound stupid when it comes to preventing another 9/11.

Yours in good times and bad,

ĖJohn Myers





Obama The Corrupt, The Thug, The Fake, The Fraud, The Assassin of The American Way of Life: And Now ďObama The RacistĒ
Obama wants to force businesses to hire black criminals. Obamaís EEOC is charging BMW & Dollar General with racism, discrimination & violation of the 1964 Civil Rights Act for using criminal background checks before hiring black employees. Obamaís logic is frightening arguing that because blacks are more likely to have been convicted of a crime, doing a criminal check discriminates against blacks. Obama is suing employers to stop background checks on one specific group: black Americans. Obama is saying in court filings that background checks on whites are perfectly fine. Obama is demanding black criminals be hired; if you wonít hire a black applicant because of his criminal record you are a racist. Seriously, this is happening in the USA. If the courts hold for Obama, this will be the final blow to job creation, economic freedom & the U.S. economy


Obama The Corrupt, The Thug, The Fake, The Fraud, The Assassin of The American Way of Life: And Now ďObama The RacistĒ

The Obama Jobs Plan: Hire Black Criminals

July 4, 2013 by Wayne Allyn Root --Personal LIberty Digest 

Watch the video here -- http://personalliberty.com/2013/07/04/the-obama-jobs-plan-hire-black-criminals/ -- or read the text of it below.

Hello, Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty.

Happy Fourth of July, everyone. God bless America. The question is: Will there still be an America, or capitalism, after President Barack Obama is through with his second term?

It sure doesnít look good to me. We have no money for fireworks displays at military bases across America and no money for patriotic fly-overs at military academy graduation ceremonies. We are letting down our heroes, the people who sacrifice selflessly for us.

But there was $100 million for Obamaís trip to visit Africa, and Obama has now pledged $7 billion to double electricity access in Africa. This has to be a comedy skit, right? This must be a nightmare. It canít be for real, right? Seven billion dollars for African electricity, while he kills the coal industry so average, middle-class Americans wonít be able to afford our own electric bills? What about our $17 trillion debt in America, our trillion-dollar deficit, our disgraceful failing public schools or our aging and decrepit infrastructure?

And Obama also has billions of dollars in aid as well as military aid for the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and the Palestinians? Even the protesters in Tahir Square in Cairo are accusing Obama of propping up the Muslim Brotherhood. Are you kidding me? Something is deep-down deadly wrong, folks. This man is destroying our country and our economy. He is killing the middle class. He is making a mockery of American values across the globe.

But donít take my word for it. Let me give you perhaps the perfect example. Everything I just mentioned is childís play compared to Obamaís newest directive. Now, Obama has truly gone off the deep end. Heís thrown off his cloak to show the "S" on his chest, standing for social justice. Obama has just decided to kick the U.S. economy while itís down.

Whatís Obamaís latest brainstorm? Force businesses to hire criminals ó and not just any criminals. Obama wants black criminals to step to the front of the employment line. If only I were joking.

Obamaís Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is charging the automaker BMW and the national retailer Dollar General with racism, discrimination and violation of the 1964 Civil Rights Act for using criminal background checks before hiring employees.

How can this be? Donít companies have a right to check backgrounds before hiring employees that represent them? Donít companies have a right not to hire convicted criminals? Not anymore. Not in Obamaís America. At least, not if the criminal is black.

The Obama governmentís logic is frightening. The EEOC argues that because blacks are more likely to have been convicted of a crime, doing a criminal check discriminates against blacks. So when you wonít hire an applicant because of his criminal record you areÖ wait for itÖ yes, a racist.

Seriously, folks. This is happening in the United States of America. If the courts hold for Obama, this will be the final body blow to job creation, economic freedom and the U.S. economy.

But letís set that aside for a moment and think what this does to your own civil rights.

When you hand your credit card to the clerk in a store, wouldnít you like to know he isnít a convicted identity thief? When you walk into an empty home for sale, wouldnít you like to know if the realtor is a murderer? When your wife goes for a massage, wouldnít you like to know the masseuse isnít a convicted rapist? Or, worse yet, when your child goes to school, child care or an after-school program, wouldnít you like to know the person youíre leaving your child with isnít a convicted predator, sexual abuser or pornographer? If Obama gets his way, there will be no way of knowing, certainly not if the employee is black.

Well, according to the Obama Administration, if you ask those questions of a black job applicant, you are a racist and committing a crime yourself.

How can anyone run a business not knowing if the people he hires to deal with customers might be convicted rapists, thieves or murderers? Employees are the public face of your business. They represent your brand. They are your thin blue line, your eyes, ears and face to your customers. And donít think you wonít be sued if one of your employees commits a criminal act against one of your customers.

How bad can this get? Well, the EEOC not only wants to ban background checks for black Americans, it wants the 70 black job applicants who BMW refused to hire because of criminal records to now be hired and given back pay and legal costs. On the other hand, the white applicants who were rejected donít have to be hired. Obamaís EEOC argues itís fair to do criminal background checks on whites.

You couldnít make this up in a fictional novel without being laughed at. You couldnít put this in a "Saturday Night Live" skit. The critics would call you ridiculous. Yet itís happening in real life under Obama.

So, what choices does a businessman have if the Obama government wins its case? First, companies will cut back hiring as much as possible. But if you are a business owner in this hostile Obama workplace environment, youíve probably already done that.

Second, if you do start a new business, youíll be looking at a business model that require no employees or very few employees.

Third, you might decide to close your current business. It just isnít worth it under Obama to take big financial risks, when government makes it this dangerous, difficult and unappealing.

Fourth, if you do need to hire employees, since you have to follow the law, companies will find some unrelated reason not to hire the applicant on whom they are legally unable to conduct a background check. Talk about "unintended consequences." Young black men, say goodbye to jobs.

So who here is destroying the U.S. economy and who here is the racist? Is it the employer who is color blind and hires on ability and character (after seeing the results of background checks) or Obama, whose policies force employers to either stop hiring, slow hiring or hire as few black applicants as possible?

Obama proves every day that you canít run an economy based on equality, social justice and retribution.

Somewhere out there in cyberspace, some liberal wacko extremist will accuse me of being a racist for daring to talk about race. Just remember that all Iíve done here is describe Obamaís jobs policy. These are all his words. He is suing employers to stop background checks on one specific group: black Americans. He is the one saying that blacks have much higher levels of criminal records. He is the one demanding black criminals be hired. He is the one saying in court filings that background checks on whites are perfectly fine.

Oh, and remember one other thing. The true definition of a racist is: anyone whoís winning a debate with an Obama supporter.

Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. Happy Independence Day. Letís all pray for independence soon from Obama. See you next week. Same time, same place. God bless.





How Obamaís Corrupt Leadership Is Selling Moral Bankruptcy To America
A catastrophic shift in the moral compass of a society rarely takes place in a vacuum. There is always a false shepherd(Obama), a corrupt leadership(Obama) that seeks to rule. Honesty must be replaced with deceit. Dissent must be replaced with silence. Peace must be replaced with violence. The independent should be treated with suspicion. The outspoken treated with contempt. Women & children are no longer people to be protected, but targets to be eliminated. The innocent dead become collateral damage. The innocent living become informants to be tortured & exploited. Good men are labeled cowards because they refuse to do what needs to be done, while evil men are labeled heroes for having the strength of will to abandon their conscience. Thus, the criminal leadership makes once honorable citizens accomplices in the crime. What we are witnessing today is the final step in the metamorphosis of America to totalitarianism.


How Obamaís Corrupt Leadership Is Selling Moral Bankruptcy To America

How The Corrupt Establishment Is Selling Moral Bankruptcy To America

Aug. 13, 2013 -- By Brandon Smith -- Personal Liberty Digest

Morality is a highly misunderstood component of human nature. Some people believe they can create moral guidelines from thin air based on their personal biases and prejudices. Some people believe that morality comes from the force of bureaucracy and government law. Still, others believe that there is no such thing; that morality is a facade created by men in order to better grease the wheels of society.

All of these world views discount the powerful scientific and psychological evidence surrounding Natural Law ó the laws that human beings form internally due to inherent conscience, regardless of environmental circumstances. When a person finally grasps inborn morality, the whole of the world comes into focus. The reality is that we are not born "good" or "evil." Rather, we are all born with the capacity for good AND evil, and this internal battle stays with us until the end of our days.

Every waking moment we are given a choice, a test of our free will, to be ruled by desire and fear, or to do what we know at our very core is right. When a man silences his inner voice, the results can be terrible for him and those around him. When an entire culture silences its inner voice, the results can be catastrophic. Such a shift in the moral compass of a society rarely takes place in a vacuum. There is always a false shepherd, a corrupt leadership that seeks to rule. Rulership, though, is difficult in the face of an awake population that respects integrity and honor. Therefore criminals must follow these specific steps in order to take power:

Pretend To Be Righteous: They must first sell the public on the idea that they hold the exact same values of natural law as everyone else. The public must at first believe that the criminal leaders are pure in their motives and have the best interests of the nation at heart, even if they secretly do not.

Pretend To Be Patriotic: Despots often proclaim an untarnished love of their homeland and the values that it was founded upon. However, what they really seek is to become a living symbol of the homeland. They insist first that they are the embodiment of the national legacy, and then they attempt to change that national legacy entirely. A corrupt government uses the ideals of a society to acquire a foothold, and when they have gained sufficient control, they dictate to that society a new set of ideals that are totally contrary to the original.

Offer To "Fix" The Economy: Tyrants do not like it when the citizens under them are self sufficient or economically independent. They will use whatever methods are at their disposal including subversive legislation, fiat currency creation, corporate monopoly and even engineered financial collapse in order to remove the publicís ability to function autonomously. They will begin this process under the guise that the current less-controlled and less-centralized system is "not safe enough," and that they have a better way to ensure prosperity.

Offer To Lend A Hand: Once the population has been removed from its own survival imperative and is for the most part helpless, the criminal leadership moves in and offers to "help" using taxation and money creation, slowly siphoning the wealth from the middle class and raising prices through inflation. Eventually, everyone will be "equal"; equally poor that is. In the end, the whole nation will see the rulership as indispensable, for without them, the economy would no longer exist and tragedy would ensue.

Create External Fear: Once in place, the criminal leadership then conjures an enemy for the people, or multiple enemies for the people. The goal here is to create a catalyst for mass fear. When the majority of people are afraid of an external threat, they will embrace the establishment as a vital safeguard. When a society becomes convinced that it cannot take care of itself economically, little coaxing is required to convince them that they are also not competent enough to take care of their own defense. At this point, the establishment has free reign to dissolve long cherished freedoms while the masses are distracted by a mysterious threat hiding somewhere over the horizon.

Create Internal Fear: They move the threat from over the horizon, right to the publicís front door, or even within their own home. The enemy is no longer a foreigner. Now, the enemy is the average looking guy two houses over, or an outspoken friend, or even a dissenting family member. The enemy is all around them, according to the establishment. The public is sold on the idea that the sacrifice needed in order to combat such a pervasive "threat" is necessarily high.

Sell The People On The Virtues Of Moral Relativism: Now that the populace is willing to forgo certain liberties for the sake of security, they have been softened up enough for reprogramming to begin. The establishment will tell the people that the principles they used to hold so dear are actually weaknesses that make them vulnerable to the enemy. In order to defeat an enemy so monstrous, they claim, we must become monstrous ourselves. We must be willing to do ANYTHING, no matter how vile or contrary to natural law, in order to win.

Honesty must be replaced with deceit. Dissent must be replaced with silence. Peace must be replaced with violence. The independent should be treated with suspicion. The outspoken treated with contempt. Women and children are no longer people to be protected, but targets to be eliminated. The innocent dead become collateral damage. The innocent living become informants to be tortured and exploited. Good men are labeled cowards because they refuse to "do what needs to be done," while evil men are labeled heroes for having the "strength of will" to abandon their conscience.

Thus, the criminal leadership makes once honorable citizens accomplices in the crime. The more disgusting the crime, the more apt the people will be to defend it and the system in general, simply because they have been inducted into the dark ceremony of moral ambiguity.

The actions of the state become the actions of all society. A single minded collectivist culture is born, one in which every person is a small piece of the greater machine. And, that which the machine is guilty of, every man is guilty of. Therefore, it becomes the ultimate and absurd purpose of each person within the system to DENY the crime, deny the guilt, and make certain that the machine continues to function for generations to come.

Though we have already passed though most of the above stages, Americans are still not yet quite indoctrinated into the realm of moral relativism. This is, though, swiftly changing.

The Current Sales Pitch

Just take a look at the attitude of the Barack Obama Administration and the mainstream media towards Edward Snowden and his recent asylum approved by Russia.

The White House, rather than admitting wrongdoing in its support for the NSAís mass surveillance of American citizens without warrant, or even attempting to deny the existence of the PRISM program, is now instead trying to promote NSA spying as essential to our well being, and wag a shaming finger at Snowden and the Russian government for damaging their domestic spy network. Obama lamented on Russiaís stance, stating that their thinking is "backwards."

Did I miss something here? Iím no fan of the Russian oligarchy, but shouldnít Obama and most of the NSA (let alone every other Federal alphabet agency) be sitting in a dark hole somewhere awaiting trial for violating the Constitution on almost every level? Yet, we are instead supposed to despise Snowden for exposing the crime they committed and distrust any country that happens to give him shelter?

Due to public outcry, Obama has attempted to pacify critics by announcing plans to make NSA mass surveillance "more transparent". First, I would like to point out that he did not offer to end NSA spying on Americans without warrant, which is what a President with any ounce of integrity would have done. Second, Obamaís calls for more transparency have come at the exact same time as the NSA announces its plans to remove 90 percent of its systems administrators to make sure another "Snowden incident" does not occur.

Does this sound like an agency that plans on becoming "more transparent"?

Second, would Obama have called for ANY transparency over the NSA whatsoever if Snowden had never come forward? Of course not! The exposure of the crime has led to lies and empty placation, nothing more.

In the meantime, numerous other political miscreants have hit the media trail, campaigning for the NSA as well as other surveillance methods, bellowing to the rafters over the absolute necessity of domestic spy programs. Fifteen years ago, the government would have tried to sweep all of this under the rug. Today, they want to acclimate us to the inevitability of the crime, stating that we had better get used to it.

Their position? That Snowdenís whistleblowing put America at risk. My questions is, how? How did Snowdenís exposure of an unConstitutional and at bottom illegal surveillance program used against hundreds of millions of innocent Americans do our country harm? Is it the position of the White House that the truth is dangerous, and deceit is safety?

I suspect this is the case considering the recent treatment of military whistleblower Bradley Manning, who has been accused by some to have "aided Al Qaedaís recruiting efforts" through his actions.

How did Manning do this? By releasing information, including battlefield videos, that were hidden from the public containing proof of U.S. war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Perhaps Iím just a traditionalist and not hip to modern diplomatic strategy, but I would think that if you donít want to be blamed for war crimes, then you probably shouldnít commit war crimes. And, if you donít want the enemy to gain new recruits, you should probably avoid killing innocent civilians and pissing off their families. Just a thought.

So, just to keep track, U.S. government commits war crimes, but is the good guy. Bradley Manning exposes war crimes, and is the bad guy. Moral relativism at its finest. Moving onÖ

The shift towards moral bankruptcy is being implemented in the financial world as well. Investors, hedge funds, and major banks now surge into the stock market every time the private Federal Reserve hints that it may continue fiat stimulus. When bad news hits the mainstream feeds, people playing the Dow casino actually cheer with glee, exactly because bad economic news means more QE from the Fed. They know that the Fed is artificially propping up the markets. The Fed openly admits that it does this. And they know that our fiscal system is hanging by a thin thread. And you know what, very few of them care.

The Fed created the collapse with easy money and manipulated interest rates, and now, some people cheer them as the heroes of the U.S. financial structure.

The American narrative is quickly changing. There has long been criminality and degeneracy within our government and the corporate cartels surrounding it, but I believe what we are witnessing today is the final step in the metamorphosis that is totalitarianism. The last stage accelerates when the average citizen is not just complicit in the deeds of devils, but when he becomes a devil himself. When Americans froth and stomp in excitement for the carnival of death, and treat the truth as poison, then the transformation will be complete.

-Brandon Smith





Obama The Fraud Is Slaughtering The U.S. Economy and The People, Politicians & Judges Getting Their Freebies, Payoffs or Blackmail Threats Just Donít Give A Damn: The picture is grim. Here are some frightening economic numbers to think about the next time the lying, manipulating mainstream media tells you that we are in recovery
Almost 50% of Americans have less than $500 in savings. 4 of 5 Americans are experiencing poverty, foreclosure or welfare. The American middle class has fallen to 27th†in the world. Auto sales are collapsing, construction jobs are falling off a cliff & U.S. factory orders just suffered the biggest drop in a year. 80% of the jobs created are part-time jobs that wonít pay the bills. Food stamp rolls are growing†75 times†as fast as employment. 90 million able-bodied, working-age Americans are not working. America under Obama has more debt than every country in the European Union combined & more government debt than any country in the history of the world


Obama The Fraud Is Slaughtering The U.S. Economy and The People, Politicians & Judges Getting Their Freebies, Payoffs or Blackmail Threats Just Donít Give A Damn: The picture is grim. Here are some frightening economic numbers to think about the next time the lying, manipulating mainstream media tells you that we are in recovery

Say Goodbye To The U.S. Economy

August 8, 2013 by Wayne Allyn Root -- Personal Liberty Digest

Watch the video here -- http://personalliberty.com/2013/08/08/say-goodbye-to-the-u-s-economy/ -- or read the text of it below.

Hello, Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. I donít mean to say, "I told you so." But I told you so.

Iíve predicted disaster for the U.S. economy since the day of Barack Obamaís election in 2008. Iíve got it all memorialized, in writing, in two books and hundreds of commentaries. In Time magazine I called Obama "the greatest jobs killer in world history." In my latest national bestseller, The Ultimate Obama Survival Guide, Iíve listed hundreds of statistics proving that the U.S. economy is headed for a total collapse. But that was all written months ago. The worst was yet to come.

The results are in. The picture is grim. Here are some frightening economic numbers to think about the next time the lying, manipulating mainstream media tells you that we are in "recovery."

First, almost 50 percent of Americans have less than $500 in savings. Not surprisingly, one out of three residents of Obamaís home State of Illinois live in poverty. A mind-numbing four of five Americans either are experiencing poverty, foreclosure or welfare, or they will in their lifetime. Four out of five. Say goodbye to the myth of the American dream. Itís only a nightmare now.

Ditto for the American middle class. Obama has massacred it. Our middle class now ranks 27th in the world. Iíve argued from day one that Obamaís goal was to create a two-class society. The two classes are the super rich (who are beholden to Obama for corporate welfare and government contracts) and the poor (who are beholden to Obama for checks to survive). Look no further than the new immigration bill to see the final destruction of middle-class wages.

More grim news: Auto sales are collapsing. Construction jobs are falling off a cliff. And U.S. factory orders just suffered the biggest drop in a year.

What about jobs? Isnít that picture getting rosier by the minute? Well, actually, no. Letís analyze the real numbers. Since the start of 2013, weíve gained 953,000 jobs; but, amazingly, 731,000 of them are crummy, low-wage, part-time jobs. Thatís means almost 80 percent of the jobs created in America are part-time jobs that wonít pay the bills of a typical middle-class lifestyle.

The best jobs are manufacturing jobs. Well, under Obama they are losing out by 10-to-1 versus crummy, low-paying jobs. Facts donít lie: So far this year more than 246,000 low-paying waiter or bartender jobs have been added to the U.S. economy, versus only 24,000 high-paying manufacturing jobs.

How bad is it? Well hereís a Hall of Fame triple play:

The Obama Administration just hired a company to promote Obamacare over the phone to Americans. Guess what? Even those jobs are part-time, with no health insurance.

The head of the Internal Revenue Service just testified in front of Congress that heíd rather keep his own health insurance than switch to Obamacare. The IRS is in charge of Obamacare, and they donít want any part of it.

And the second-biggest employer in America is now a temp agency. Good luck getting a quality job in this Obama economy.

Still not convinced? Food stamp rolls are growing 75 times as fast as employment. The national debt has increased by 50 percent under Obama, even though he promised to reduce it. Obama promised to reduce health insurance bills for an average American family by $2,500 per year. Instead, your health bills went up by $3,000 per year. The menís labor participation is the lowest rate ever measured since they started tracking it in 1948. And hereís the clincher: 90 million able-bodied, working-age Americans are not working.

All of this misery morphs together in one tragic new statistic of the Obama economy: There are more Americans getting "food assistance" checks (101 million) than working in the private sector (97 million). We are certainly witnessing the complete destruction of the middle class. Itís been a purposeful plan by Obama from the first day ó just as I predicted from the first day.

And if you think help is on the way, Iíve got a bridge to sell youÖ in Detroit. The biggest city to ever go bankrupt, Detroit, has been run by Democrats since 1962. Thatís more than half a century of 100 percent Democrat rule, using the exact same policies as Obama. The city is now in ruins. Detroit leads the Nation in illiteracy, welfare, food stamps, violent crime, murder, abandoned properties and broken street lights.

The city of Detroitís downfall is built around four core ideas: never-ending entitlement spending, the most government employees per capita of any city in America, monstrous debt and the highest property taxes in America. Itís no surprise then that Detroit is hopelessly bankrupt. But wait, isnít that Obamaís exact prescription for prosperity for the Nation? High taxes, more spending, more debt and more government employees. Bingo. Help isnít coming, folks. The cavalry isnít riding in to save you. They are coming to kill us.

Detroit is certainly the future of America under Obama. Itís the exact same policies. We are experiencing Groundhog Day: doing the same stupid things and expecting a different result.

One last morsel of food for thought: The EU is in the middle of a Great Depression. Countries like Spain, Portugal, Italy, France, Greece and Cyprus face total disaster. Their economies are ruined for generations to come. Yet America under Obama now has more debt than every country in the European Union, combined. Our country has more government debt than any country in the history of the world.

Say goodbye to the U.S. economy. Itís been nice while it lasted. But remember: I told you so. Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. Same time, same place. God bless America.





The Obama Regime, The Major Media, The Public Schools and Hollywood Dumb-Down Americaís Youth Into Stupid-Is-As-Stupid-Does: 47% of 18-to-30 year-olds now believe that the 1st Amendment of the Constitution goes too far in the rights it guarantees
The goal is to manufacture a dumbed-down public too ignorant of their rights and too preoccupied to fathom repressive tyranny. The collapse of the USA is being staved off temporarily through welfare, never-ending unemployment benefits, food stamps, free stuff and money printing. Important issues like the disastrous amnesty bill, IRS targeting, Benghazi terror attacks, Fast & Furious gun-walking scandal, long-term high unemployment, payoffs to and thefts by the banksters & Wall Street, ongoing money debasement, and the illegitimacy of the Obama regime are ignored, while the masses occupy themselves with prescription drugs, wall-to-wall coverage of celebrity escapades, sporting events and falsely created racial issues.


The Obama Regime, The Major Media, The Public Schools and Hollywood Dumb-Down Americaís Youth Into Stupid-Is-As-Stupid-Does: 47% of 18-to-30 year-olds now believe that the 1st Amendment of the Constitution goes too far in the rights it guarantees

A Nation Of Ignoramuses

July 22, 2013 by Bob Livingston -- Personal Liberty Digest

The United States is devolving into a Nation of ignoramuses, its citizens increasingly ignorant of U.S. and world history and particularly uninformed regarding the Nationís founding documents and what led to the creation of their Nation.

The governmentís public (non)education system, the agenda-driven mainstream media propaganda system, Hollywoodís disinformation, campaigns promoting bread and circuses and the infusion of millions of aliens into the country are doing the job the collectivist progressive elites envisioned. The goal is to manufacture a populace too ignorant of their rights and too preoccupied to fathom even most repressive tyranny.

A recent national poll by the Newseum Instituteís First Amendment Center revealed that almost half (47 percent) of 18- to 30-year-olds agree with the statement that the 1st Amendment goes too far in the rights it guarantees.

The poll sampled 1,006 American adults from the 48 contiguous States. Its findings are astonishing and maddening.

The 1st Amendment reads:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or of the right of the people to peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

When asked to name the five specific freedoms in the 1st Amendment, 36 percent of those polled were unable to name any. Freedom of speech was named by 59 percent, followed by freedom of religion (24 percent), freedom of the press (14 percent), right to assemble (11 percent) and right to petition government (4 percent).

The survey found that that while the percentage of Americans who can name the five 1st Amendment rights has generally increased since the organization began annual polling in 1997, the overall awareness of the 1st Amendment has decreased.

Among all those surveyed, 64 percent say the 1st Amendment does not go too far. But 52 percent of blacks and 50 percent of Hispanics say the amendment does go too far. That number drops to 29 percent of the white population.

The poll was conducted in May as stories about the governmentís spying on journalists with The Associated Press and FOX News were coming out. It showed that Americans were split over whether reporters should reveal their sources if doing so made the country safer. Fifty-one percent opposed government requiring journalists to reveal their sources, while 44 percent supported it. That number is up from 37 percent in 2008.

And although only slightly more than half opposed journalists being forced to reveal their sources, 80 percent expected the news media to act as a government watchdog. How journalists are supposed to do that if they canít keep their sources confidential was not asked. The question would probably not have been understood by the 49 percent.

The (non)education system and schools ó predominantly run and staffed by socialists, progressives, collectivists and Marxists ó omit teaching on the Nationís origins and vilify the Founders and their struggle ó demonizing the great explorers and the likes of Thomas Jefferson and Patrick Henry while glorifying Marxist criminals like Che Guevera.

Regimes ó Presidential, Congressional and judicial ó past and present have trampled the Bill of Rights almost out of existence. The 1st Amendment is no exception.

Christians are a main target of the statist elected class, media punditry and Hollywood, all of which are working overtime to destroy the value system and morality that has existed in this country since its inception.

The Barack Obama regime has targeted Christian-owned businesses for special persecution by requiring, through the unConstitutional Obamacare deathcare system, the inclusion of birth control and abortion services in their employee healthcare plans in direct contravention of their religious beliefs against them.

It has foisted upon the country, through court sanction, abetted by an ongoing propaganda campaign and against the wishes of the majority, homosexual marriage: a union that is anathema to Christian teachings.

Freedom of speech, assembly and redress are under attack in myriad ways. The Department of Justiceís targeting of reporters, the regimeís persecution of whistle-blowers, attempts by the government to gain control of the Internet, the National Defense Authorization Actís Section 1021, the creation of "thought crimes" through hate crime laws and the massive Orwellian surveillance state all bespeak of a regime that is becoming increasingly fearful, lacking in legitimacy and totalitarian.

In ways subtle and overt, Hollywood is destroying the moral fabric of society and the masses lap it up. Hollywood portrays the family matrix as dysfunctional, glorifies perversion and strips males of all dignity, portraying them as idiotic buffoons, lazy, incompetent and in constant pursuit of base animalistic pleasures.

Hollywood demonstrates a misogynistic attitude toward women. They are sexualized, often scantily clad and presented as "eye candy" and sexual objects; and if their bodies and features arenít perfect, their characters are subject to ridicule and/or presented as inviting abuse or being either villainous or simpleton. A UNESCO report on the portrayal of women in the media describes the litany of common images of women: "the glamorous sex kitten, the sainted mother, the devious witch, the hardfaced (sic) corporate and political climber."

The regime, aided and abetted by the mainstream media, constantly inflames passions, creates conflict and feeds the public distractions and bread and circus that serves to obfuscate and cover up its crimes.

Meanwhile, the Nation and the republican system are in a state of collapse ó that collapse being staved off temporarily through welfare, never-ending unemployment benefits, food stamps, free telephones and other free "stuff" and money printing. The dumbed-down public remains unaware that the regime and its elite puppet masters are stealing its wealth and enslaving it, binding the chains tighter by the day.

The 2nd Amendment is under constant assault. Even though it is the Amendment by which all others can be preserved, the public is increasingly buying into the lie that guns are objects to be scorned as if theyíre scorpions that sting on their own. The media and the Obama Administration overhyped the George Zimmerman trial in an agenda-driven effort to stir racial conflict and create a flashpoint of violence over which it can push for stricter gun laws or, worse, martial law.

The 4th Amendment is long gone, crushed under the so-called USA Patriot Act, NDAA, the ever-expanding Department of Homeland (in)Security and the massive National Stasi Agency spying apparatus.

Fifth Amendment rights are being eroded by the courts and the regime daily. Now Americans can be targeted for drone attacks and murdered without due process. More and more the courts are allowing the law enforcement apparatus to use all your words against you so that itís no longer safe to even have a conversation with a police officer. And, as the ongoing DOJ persecution of Zimmerman shows, double jeopardy provisions are non-existent.

These and other rights are pushed aside and thrown into historyís trash heap. Theyíve disappeared with hardly a whimper.

Important issues like the criminal "Gang of Eightís" amnesty bill, Internal Revenue Service targeting, Benghazi terror attacks, Fast and Furious gunwalking scandal, long-term high unemployment, payoffs to and thefts by the banksters and Wall Street, ongoing money debasement and the regimeís illegitimacy are ignored while the masses occupy themselves with prescription drugs, wall-to-wall coverage of celebrity escapades, sporting events and falsely created racial issues.





Obamaís Government Is Twice As Bankrupt As Detroit
Detroit's population has declined by almost 70% since 1960. Roughly 1/2 of the people who remain are functionally illiterate. More than 60% live below the poverty line. And roughly half of all adults don't work. Detroit is a living case study of why government efforts to redistribute wealth don't work. But instead of recognizing any of the lessons of the catastrophe, OBAMA! promises more of the same policies. Meanwhile, Obamaís government is in far worse shape than the city. But no nation in history became wealthier by printing money & buying its own government's debts. In every case, inflation soon destroyed the economies & wiped out private savings. The dream that the government could provide prosperity to the residents of Detroit has come to its inevitable end. The dream that the federal government can provide prosperity to the entire country is even more delusional. It will come to a far worse end. Believe me, this will come to pass


Obamaís Government Is Twice As Bankrupt As Detroit

Our Federal Government Is Twice As Bankrupt As Detroit

By Porter Stansberry

Wednesday, July 31, 2013

Detroit declared bankruptcy a few days ago.

I've written, for years, about how Detroit should serve as a stark warning to Americans who believe in liberal social policies, like highly progressive taxes and expensive social safety nets.

These socialist programs don't cure income inequality. They merely destroy wealth by reducing incentives for building businesses and encouraging dependency. That's why societies with lots of government spending typically have few civil institutions and a small middle class.

Here's the message our politicians on both sides of the aisle seem to miss: 50 years ago, Detroit was one of the largest and wealthiest cities in the world. Nearly 2 million people lived there, and it enjoyed the highest per-capita income in the United States.

Then, in 1960, everything changed.

Liberal Democrats came to power (and have held power since). Their ideas about using the government to build a "Great Society" Ė using the government to provide a cradle-to-grave social safety net Ė have slowly transformed Detroit from the wealthiest city in America to a hellhole.

Detroit's population has declined by almost 70% since 1960. Roughly half of the people who remain are functionally illiterate. More than 60% live below the poverty line. And roughly half of all adults don't work. Only about one-third of the city's ambulances are in working order. Almost half of the streetlights don't work. It takes the police an average of 58 minutes to respond to emergency calls. The violent crime rate (no surprise) is five times higher than the national average.

It is shocking to realize that only 50 years ago, Detroit was the shining example for the world of capitalism and civil society. It doesn't take long to destroy wealth.

Now consider thisÖ Detroit went bankrupt with total debts of around $20 billion. That's roughly $28,000 per remaining citizen. That's nothing. The debts that the U.S. government has amassed over the same period (the last 50 years) are vastly larger.

Today, all Americans owe more than $16.7 trillion on the federal level Ė that's nearly $54,000 per citizen and nearly $150,000 per taxpayer. How many Americans do you think realize that our federal government is twice as bankrupt as Detroit?

Detroit is a living case study of why government efforts to redistribute wealth don't work. But instead of recognizing any of the lessons of the catastrophe, OBAMA! promises more of the same policies.

Meanwhile, his government is in far worse shape than the city. The only real difference is the president and the federal government are still able to print their way out of trouble, using the Federal Reserve's ongoing manipulation of the U.S. Treasury market.

But no nation in history became wealthier by printing money and buying its own government's debts. In every case, inflation soon destroyed the economies and wiped out private savings. Rates on the U.S. 10-year Treasury bond have recently moved from 1.6% to 2.6% Ė in the face of continued Federal Reserve buying of $85 billion a month.

The dream that the government could provide prosperity to the residents of Detroit has come to its inevitable end. The dream that the federal government can provide prosperity to the entire country is even more delusional. It will come to a far worse end.

Printing trillions in new dollar bills to facilitate the madness won't prevent the inevitable bankruptcy of our country. It will merely gut the middle class of its savings and its wages first.

Believe meÖ this will come to pass. It will not take another 50 years. Maybe 10.

Regards,

Porter Stansberry





Obama The Fake and Obama The Fraud: Obama claims he graduated from Columbia University in Political Science, but the department head, professors, and class members in a Political Science class of only 150 students do not remember him. No wonder Obama had his college records sealed
Obama claims he attended and graduated from Columbia University majoring in political science; however, Columbia Professor Emeritus Henry Franklin Graff said he did not believe Barrack Obama ever attended Columbia and that Obama could not have been a political science major there because there never was a Barrack Obama in any of his classes. He went on to say that he has no memory of Obama and that he has spoken to many professors and none of them have ever taught a Barrack Obama. Graff is Columbia Universityís famous professor, who was there for almost half a century, was ďthe political science professorĒ at Columbia University and was the head of the political science department.


Obama The Fake and Obama The Fraud: Obama claims he graduated from Columbia University in Political Science, but the department head, professors, and class members in a Political Science class of only 150 students do not remember him. No wonder Obama had his college records sealed

Barack Obama: The Ghost Of Columbia University

June 6, 2013 by Wayne Allyn Root --Personal Liberty Digest

Watch the video here -- http://personalliberty.com/2013/06/06/barack-obama-the-ghost-of-columbia-university/ -- or read the text of it below.

Hello, this is Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. I just returned from New York, where I attended my 30th Columbia University reunion. I celebrated with my esteemed classmates. Everyone except Barack Obama. As usual, he wasnít there. Not even a video greeting. Not a personalized letter to his classmates. Nothing. But worse, no one I met at our 30th reunion ever met him. The President of the United States is the ghost of Columbia University.

Iím certainly no "Johnny come lately." For five years now (since 2007 when it became clear Barack Obama was running for President), Iíve been quoted in the media as saying that no one Iíve ever met at Columbia can remember ever meeting, or even seeing, our college classmate Barack Obama. Donít you think the media should be asking questions? Isnít this a very strange story?

I am a graduate of Columbia University, Class of 1983. Thatís the same class Barack Obama claims to have graduated from. We shared the same exact major; political science. We were both pre-law. It was a small class; about 700 students. The Political Science department was even smaller and closer-knit (maybe 150 students). I thought I knew, or met at least once, (or certainly saw in classes) every fellow poly sci classmate in my four years at Columbia.

But not Obama. No one ever met him. Even worse, no one even remembers seeing that unique memorable face. Think about this for a minute. Our classmate is President of the United States. Shouldnít someone remember him? Or at least claim to remember him?

One of the speakers at the 30th reunion should have reminisced about "my days with the future President." But no one did. Youíd think Obama might have sent a video to tell us all how much he enjoyed his time at Columbia. Youíd think heíd have sent at least a letter to be read aloud from one of his former college buddies. Right? But he didnít. Because Obama has no former college buddies. No one that ever met Obama, let alone befriended him, was in attendance at our 30th class reunion.

Now you might argue this is all strange, but itís possible. After all, Columbia says he graduated. And I take my collegeís word for it. Would one of the worldís greatest Ivy League institutions participate in a cover-up, thereby risking their billion dollar reputation? And there is one single article written for the Columbia newspaper with Obamaís name on it. A single photo also exists of Obama in his Manhattan apartment with the man he claims was his college roommate ó a Pakistani foreign student. USA Today described Obamaís roommate as a pot smoker, cocaine user and foreign student. Isnít that lovely? And one single radical leftist Columbia professor who hates Israel also claims he remembers Obama. Quite a crew in the Obama camp, huh? Hard to even believe.

Thatís the sum total of Obamaís existence at Columbia University, Class of í83.

So I asked every classmate I met at our 30th reunion, many of them political science majors, if they ever met, or saw, or heard of Obama. The answer was a resounding "NO" from every one of them. I asked if they found this strange, or worried how this was possible? They all answered "yes." I asked if they thought it was possible to be a political science major and never meet a fellow major in our small classes? They all gave me a very strange look and answered "no." So I asked, "How could this be possible? Can you explain this?" No one had an answer.

Keep in mind these people I spoke to are all ó to a man and woman ó dedicated liberal Democrats who voted for Obama. Iím guessing 90 percent are major Democrat contributors. My Columbia classmates are the cream of the crop of American society. Lawyers, doctors, billionaire hedge fund members, stars of the media. They adore Obama. But they all admit they never met him in their four years at Columbia. I am proud of my classmates for their honesty and integrity.

One classmate told me he was present when one of the most honored professors in Columbia University history gave a speech to alumni a couple of years ago. The speech was followed by Q&A. This beloved professor was asked about Obama at Columbia. He said, "I have my doubts about the story." The crowd was stunned. He immediately went onto the next question and never elaborated. So obviously Iím not the only one with doubts.

So hereís my take on this great mystery. Iíve never said Obama was not registered at Columbia. Iím sure he was. Iíve never said he didnít graduate. If Columbia says he did, then Iím sure he did. But Iíve always said there is something wrong with the story. Itís rancid. Itís unbelievable. Itís impossible. Itís the story of a Manchurian candidate.

The question isnít was he ever registered, or did he graduate? And itís interesting that one photo, one professor, and one newspaper article exists ó just enough to provide a thin cover. The kind of thin cover you might find created by the CIA or KGB. Really strange.

But the serious question the media should be asking isÖWhat did Obama do for two full years in-between registration and graduation? Did he ever attend a class? Did he ever have a single friend other than a Pakistani national? Why is the only professor to ever come forward and claim he remembers him a radical leftist who hates Israel? What exactly was he doing when no one met him, saw him or heard of him? Why are his college records sealed? What has he got to hide? But my educated guess is he canít, or wonít ever release those records. Because what weíd find would be shocking.

Now I know somewhere in America is an Obama defender that will accuse me of lying. But are all those classmates at our 30th reunion lying too? And if I wanted to lie, wouldnít I better off saying I knew the future President well? If I wanted to malign the President, shouldnít I be saying he was my close buddy and I witnessed all kinds of terrible things? If someone wanted to smear the President, wouldnít they say they saw him snorting cocaine at a Columbia party? Anyone could make that claim. But I canít say that. Because I never witnessed anything. Neither did any of my classmates. We didnít know him. Never met him. Never saw him. He wasnít at any Columbia parties. My story is simply the truth, and itís the same consistent story Iíve told since 2007.

There is something wrong with Obamaís story, that much I know. He is either the ghost of Columbia, or the perfect Manchurian candidate. But something smells rotten at Columbia. Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week same time, same place. God Bless America.

***At the end of the video for this article, Wayne Allyn Root added this update:

Obama claims he attended and graduated from Columbia University majoring in political science; however, Professor Emeritus Henry Franklin Graff, in an interview, said he did not believe Barrack Obama ever attended Columbia and that Obama could not have been a political science major there because there never was a Barrack Obama in any of his classes. He went on to say that he has no memory of Obama and that he has spoken to many professors and none of them have ever taught a Barrack Obama. Graff is Columbiaís famous professor, who was there for almost half a century, was "the political science professor" at Columbia University and was the head of the political science department.





Obama Is Mutilating The American Dream Into The American Nightmare: More Americans are now getting food-assistance-checks than there are Americans working in the entire private sector
The dream is to come to America and to achieve your dreams to become whomever you want to be. To rid yourself of the shackles of your present country where the government dictates who you are and what you will become or not become. So many have fought and died to maintain that dream for over 2 centuries. However, Obama, twice elected by fools, literally spits on the American Dream and is sadistically transforming America into a dark, hopeless dungeon where he plans to imprison the American dream forever. Obama condemns and punishes success and rewards government dependency; yet he wants American Dreamers to bust their butts to support his dependent voters who donít want to even get off of their butts. As a result, the American Dream is dying as more and more dreamers go from butt-busters to butt-sitters.


Obama Is Mutilating The American Dream Into The American Nightmare: More Americans are now getting food-assistance-checks than there are Americans working in the entire private sector

Businessman To Obama: You Win!

July 11, 2013 by Wayne Allyn Root -- Personal Liberty Digest

Watch the video here -- http://personalliberty.com/2013/07/11/businessman-to-obama-you-win/ -- or read the text of it below.

Hello, Iím Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty.

Have you heard the latest mind-blowing statistic about the Barack Obama economy? There are now more Americans getting "food assistance" checks (101 million of them) than people working in the private sector (97 million). Whoís going to pay those bills, Mr. Obama?

Well, the answer has always been clear ó entrepreneurs and small-business owners like me. People with those now rare American values ó like work ethic, ambition, self-reliance, rugged individualism and personal responsibility. People with enthusiasm for work and for building a legacy for their families. You know: Those people you hate and resent, Mr. Obama.

Iíve got a sad story about the end of all that ó and perhaps the end of America.

Iím your typical entrepreneur and capitalist evangelist, the kind of American that Obama will never understand. I enjoy working long hours, and Iím willing to risk my life savings on a business idea. I believe Iím the one responsible to feed, clothe and house my family ó not the government. I get up early and work late, 14 to 16 hours a day. I work weekends and holidays. All vacations are "working vacations." 24/7. Thatís the life of an entrepreneur.

I chose this life. Itís my choice to risk my own money and work long hours. Itís my choice to provide my family with the best. Iím not looking for a blue ribbon or a pat on the back.

But I also donít expect my President to resent me for my success, or to kick me in the gut, or to spit in my face. Mr. President, you shouldnít be demonizing, denigrating and insulting me. You shouldnít be claiming that people like me "donít pay your fair share" when, in reality, your voters pay nothing (and expect checks from the government, too).

You shouldnít be saying, "You didnít build that." Actually, yes, we did. Our work ethic, job creation and taxes pay for everything government builds. Our taxes pay for the checks you give to your voters.

Mr. President, you have no right to put us down, while complimenting and rewarding those who arenít willing sacrifice for success and donít feel personal responsibility. You have no right to redistribute our money to those who donít have our work ethic. Thatís wrong. That kills our spirit. That damages the U.S. economy.

There is no need to debate how wrong you are. The Obama economy proves what happens when you punish and demonize the job creators ó an unprecedented economic disaster. Last week, the mainstream media celebrated a month of "195,000 jobs created." Really? The truth is sobering. The U.S. economy last month gained 360,000 crummy part-time jobs and lost 240,000 full-time jobs. There are now 28 million Americans underemployed in part-time jobs. The second leading employer in America is now a temp agency. Only 47 percent of American adults are working (and that includes part-time jobs).

Welcome to Obamageddon. There are no good jobs ó only crummy, crappy, part-time jobs. To get ready for your next job, repeat after me: "Sir, would you like a shake with your cheeseburger and fries?"

But, Mr. President, I will give you credit for one achievement. I thought it could never happen. You have single-handedly cured me of my work ethic and addiction to success. I am healed. Mr. Obama, you have set me free.

This past weekend I experienced how the other half lives. For the first time in my adult life, I took the entire holiday weekend off. As a work-at-home father and business owner, I normally spend a few hours each day with my children between phone calls, answering 300 emails, multiple daily meetings and conference calls, and other work requirements. This weekend, my wife and 5-year-old daughter visited friends in Los Angeles, leaving me as the sole caregiver for my sons, ages 9 and 13, for the entire four-day holiday weekend.

So I decided to clear the slate for the first time in my life. To just have some fun. To experience what life is like for the typical non-business owner on a holiday weekend. I ignored emails and stopped taking business calls. I turned down several business meetings. I just shut it all down.

Guess what? I had a ball! My boys and I watched guysí shoot íem up movies. We went gun shooting.  We shot off fireworks. We swam and played football. We ate steak dinners. It was the ultimate father-son weekend, with no business interruptions.

Thatís when I realizedÖ Iím done. It no longer pays to sacrifice under Obama. There is no payoff. Iíve sacrificed 14 to 16 hours a day, 365 days per year, to build businesses, create jobs, to give my family the best life possible. But Iím done. You win. Youíve pulled off the impossible, Mr. Obama. Youíve reformed me! I was the poster boy for workaholic entrepreneur. Not anymore.

Mr. President, why should I sacrifice so your voters can have free Obama phones (now with free texting, too)? Why should I work for an abusive boss like you who resents my sacrifices? Why should I work long hours so your voters can grab more of my money, while classifying ambition, sacrifice, discipline and personal responsibility as "evil" or "greedy?"

Under your system, the more I make, the more you take. There is no incentive, so why put in the extra effort?

The answer isÖ I no longer will. 

Mr. Obama, Iím done giving 110 percent. There is no "extra credit," so why do the extra work? When a hard-working entrepreneur like me loses his love for work, stops putting in longer hours, takes weekends off, turns down the third or even fourth career because itís not worth the effort, you better turn out the lights and close the door, because the partyís over.

But you do have one little problem, Obama. Whoís going to pay the bills? Whoís going to pay for those 101 million Americans on "food assistance?" Whoís going to pay your $7 billion bill to expand electricity access in Africa? Whoís going to pay for your $100 million travel bills? Whoís going to pay for your "free healthcare?" Whoís going to pay for the bloated pensions of 22 million government employees? Whoís going to pay the interest on your $100 trillion in debt and unfunded liabilities? If not me, who?

And you can bet your last dollar that if Iíve come to this never-before-imagined decision to slow down and no longer give 110 percent, so have millions of other entrepreneurs.

So, Mr. Obama, I sure hope you have a backup plan to pay the bills. Maybe all those free Obama phone recipients can "spare a dime." Maybe you can convince all those Obama voters on "food assistance" to stop using their food stamps for booze and strip clubs. Maybe you can convince Bangladesh to hold "AID AMERICA" concerts. Or, Mr. President, you can simply hide under the bed covers while presiding over the total collapse of the U.S. economy. Congratulations! Youíve proven that socialism doesnít work. Eventually, you run out of other peopleís money.

Payback is a bi-ch.

ĖWayne Allyn Root





Obama The Corrupt and Obama The Thug: Like a petulant child, Obama always blames someone else when heís caught with his hands in the corrupt messes that he creates
One after the other, the scandals break & President Barack Obama feigns ignorance. He didnít know. He didnít know. Heís the smartest man in the world, & he didnít know. And do not doubt that heís corrupt. Obamaís problem is that now even the mainstream media canít ignore it. Itís hit them too close to home (wiretapping APís phones, threats to whistle-blowers, thuggishly threatening reporters who donít toe the line, siccing the IRS on reporters who dare ask tough questions; & by ignoring it, the media loses what little shred of credibility they have left. In addition to being corrupt, Obamaís a thug. He uses the politics of personal destruction - & he has throughout his political career - & he doesnít care about collateral damage. Heís Tricky Dick with better-fitting suits & a complexion that hides his 5 oíclock shadow.


Obama The Corrupt and Obama The Thug: Like a petulant child, Obama always blames someone else when heís caught with his hands in the corrupt messes that he creates

Obama The Obtuse

May 15, 2013 by Bob Livingston -- Personal Liberty Digest  

One after the other, the scandals break and President Barack Obama feigns ignorance. He didnít know guns were walking to Mexico. He didnít know that Benghazi wasnít caused by a video. He didnít know he was lying when he repeated his claim "the video did it." He didnít know the Internal Revenue Service was targeting Tea Parties and small-government advocates. He didnít know his own Department of Justice was stealing the phone calls of a major news organization.

He didnít know. He didnít know. He didnít know. He didnít know. Heís the smartest man in the world, and he didnít know.

During the run-up to the 2008 election, we were treated ad nauseam to reports of Obamaís superior intellect. After all, he attended college at Occidental, Columbia University, Harvard School of LawÖ or so he says. He was first an editor and then president of the Harvard Law ReviewÖ or so he says. He was a law professor ó err, lecturer ó at the University of Chicago School of Law.

Brilliant guy, or so they say. Yet when it comes time to own up the responsibilities of the Presidency, heís strangely absentÖ or absentminded. In a word, heís obtuse.

Obtuse Obamaís sycophants will no doubt rush to his defense. He couldnít know everything going on, theyíll say. Itís the gun dealerís fault. Itís Eric Holderís fault. Itís some low-level IRS department headsí fault. Itís the mediaís fault. Itís George W. Bushís faultÖ or Dick Cheneyís. Itís the Tea Partyís fault. Itís Weeper John Boehnerís fault or Mitch McConnellís. There was no cover-up. We shouldnít know everything government knows. He wasnít targeting his enemies. What does it matter? It was a long time ago. Thereís just no there there.

Harry Truman said, "The buck stops here." Bill Clinton was content to pass the buck to Janet Reno. Obtuse Obama doesnít where the buck has gone; he just knows he doesnít have it. Like a petulant child, he always blames someone else when heís caught with his hand in the corrupt mess he created.

And do not doubt that heís corrupt. Obtuse Obamaís problem is that now even the mainstream media canít ignore it. Itís hit them too close to home (wiretapping APís phones, threats to whistle-blowers, thuggishly threatening reporters who donít toe the line, siccing the IRS on reporters who dare ask tough questions); and by ignoring it, theyíre losing what little shred of credibility they had left.

In addition to being obtuse, Obamaís a thug. I told you this a little more than a year ago. He uses the politics of personal destruction ó and he has throughout his political career Ė and he doesnít care about collateral damage. Heís Tricky Dick with better-fitting suits and a complexion that hides his 5 oíclock shadow.

But if it makes his sycophants, his slavish followers ó those talking-point parrots who come here day after day and dribble out their foolishness on Obamaís behalf ó happy, weíll just call him Obtuse Obama. That way, heís not responsible for his failures. But Mr. and Ms. Obama Worshipper, donít tell us anymore how smart he is. You canít have it both ways.





Obama Ramps Up His War On America: Obama the assassin wants to kill the American way of life
Obama plans to skirt Congress & cut so-called carbon pollution from existing power plants; he says heís going to regulate coal out of business. Never mind that the first section of the first article of the Constitution grants all legislative powers to Congress; never mind that temperatures have not risen in 20 years, despite an increase in so-called ďcarbon pollutionĒ; never mind that carbon dioxide is not a pollutant but is, along with oxygen, one of the two most important gasses in our atmosphere & vital to life; never mind that more regulations on energy will drive up energy costs & the prices of appliances, cars & machinery, & will further cripple the moribund economy & will drive more of the middle class toward poverty; & never mind that so-called renewable energy is not about creating renewable energy but is about transferring wealth. Obama is dead set on†his agenda to destroy the.........


Obama Ramps Up His War On America: Obama the assassin wants to kill the American way of life

Obama Ramps Up His War On America

June 26, 2013 by Bob Livingston -- Personal Liberty Digest

 The Barack Obama regime opened a new front in his war on America yesterday when he unveiled his plans to skirt Congress and cut so-called carbon pollution from existing power plants.

Most in Congress recognize the reality that the majority of Americans have concluded that anthropomorphic global warming is so much hokum and that any effort to further burden Americans with laws and regulations to stop something that doesnít exist is a non-starter. But the collectivists, progressives and outright anti-human environmental lunatics that make up Obamaís inner circle donít take "no" for an answer. So Obama says heís going to regulate coal out of business.

Never mind that the first section of the first article of the Constitution grants all legislative powers to Congress; never mind that temperatures have not risen in 20 years, despite an increase in so-called "carbon pollution"; never mind that carbon dioxide is not a pollutant but is, along with oxygen, one of the two most important gasses in our atmosphere and vital to life; never mind that more regulations on energy will drive up energy costs and the prices of appliances, cars and machinery, and will further cripple the moribund economy and will drive more of the middle class toward poverty; and never mind that so-called renewable energy is not about creating renewable energy but is about transferring wealth, Obama is dead set on  his agenda to destroy the American way of life.





Obama The Free Society Assassin: Mass Surveillance is not about safety; itís about power; itís a means of enslavement
Supporters of government mass surveillance donít understand that it is not a passive tool, but a vicious weapon; it maims & kills free society. If we do not stop the institutionalization of surveillance, every citizen will find himself a target. To be able to invade the life of another human being at will; to catalog his hopes, dreams & weaknesses; to put yourself in a position to judge him from a discreet distance or undermine his future entirely: This is what surveillance is truly about. Mass surveillance is not about safety; itís about power. It is a means of enslavement. Government elites spy on the public because they have done or are about to do things that will trigger resentment & rebellion. They keep tabs on us because they fear what we will eventually do to them. They watch us because they plan to hurt us, and they want to be sure they get away with it.


Obama The Free Society Assassin: Mass Surveillance is not about safety; itís about power; itís a means of enslavement.

The web page is too large to displayOK

OK

An error has occurred.