Shildt Financial Services
210 W. Hamilton Avenue
State College, PA 16801
800-211-7819 (Toll-Free)
234-1419 (Local Area)

shildtfs@aol.com



 



Home


Contact Info


Safety Alerts
and Save America News


Links


Files


Conference


 More Information



About Shildt Financial Services


Products & Services


"10 Reasons"
To Use Us


Proposal Requests







..

Safety Alerts And Save America News


SAFETY ALERTS: go to CPSC, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, to help keep your family and yourself safe by checking product recalls and safety news.

Or go to FDA, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, for recalls, market withdrawals and safety alerts.

 

wavingeagleV1X.gif 

SAVE  AMERICA  NEWS: 

When you see that in order to produce, you need to obtain permission from men who produce nothing—when you see that money is flowing to those who deal, not in goods, but in favors—when you see that men get richer by graft and by pull than by work, and your laws don’t protect you against them, but protect them against you—when you see corruption being rewarded and honesty becoming a self-sacrifice—you may know that your society is doomed.

Ayn Rand; Atlas Shrugged

 

OCEANS OF TEARS FROM THE OBAMA YEARS: 

"OBAMA IS BURYING AMERICA ALIVE"



View the index page


Pray That Hillary Is The Democrat Nominee: She is the biggest scandal-ridden fraud and hypocrite in the history of world politics
Hillary says she fights for the rights of women. Yet she accepts hundreds of millions in donations from Muslim governments that stone women, don’t allow them to be educated, and arrest, whip and occasionally execute them for being the victims of rape. She says she fights for the rights of gays. But she gladly accepted multimillion-dollar checks from Muslim governments that stone gays and drop them off roofs of buildings. Then there’s her role in the Benghazi scandal deaths and her erasure of 32,000 emails, her buying of 2 million fake Facebook fans, and her being bought and paid for by the 2 billion dollars in donations to the Clinton Foundation from the wealthiest people and foreign governments in the world. Hillary - Obama in a pantsuit - is a ticking time bomb that will either implode or have her campaign destroyed by an exposed horrific scandal.


Pray That Hillary Is The Democrat Nominee: She is the biggest scandal-ridden fraud and hypocrite in the history of world politics

Pray for Hillary

April 16, 2015 By Wayne Allyn Root — Personal Liberty

Watch the video here — Watch the video here — http://personalliberty.com/pray-hillary/ — or read the text of it below — or read the text of it below:

If you’re a conservative, Libertarian, limited government Constitutionalist or patriot, pray for Hillary. She’s our best hope for 2016. I love Hillary Clinton. I’m rooting for Hillary. She is a gift from heaven. I pray for her nomination every morning.

No, I’m not a fan of Hillary. No, I don’t support her policies. No, I don’t want her as president. But I sure want her as the Democratic nominee. She is "the gift that keeps on giving." Hillary has so much baggage her campaign should be sponsored by Samsonite.

If the GOP has any hope of winning in 2016, Hillary has to be the nominee. Before I get to the scandals, let’s start with the obvious. Hillary is old news, over the hill, tired, worn out, spoiled milk. She is just going through the motions. She doesn’t even look or sound like she cares. Hillary herself can’t think of a single compelling reason for why she should be president. She’s just been waiting around a long time. And she’s a woman. That’s it. That’s her reason.

She’s so old and entitled that the guy who managed her campaign for U.S. Senate, New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio, refuses to endorse her for president. He basically just said what I said. She’s old news. She has no new ideas. She offers America nothing new. That’s one of her closest allies speaking.

Every candidate needs a brand. Hillary’s brand is "Entitlement. It’s my time. Oh, and I’m a female." Pray this is the Democratic nominee.

If Hillary is the nominee, she can be destroyed and branded with so many scandals, it’s like shooting fish in a barrel. Destroy her with her own words, "What difference does it make?" Those were her words in front of a congressional committee about the Benghazi tragedy. Four heroes were murdered. She participated in a coverup and all she could think to say was, "What difference does it make?" Meaning, those young heroes are all dead, so who cares?

Her own TV ads in 2008 bragged about her decision-making abilities at 2 a.m. when the important call comes in. Well, we now know what she said when that call came in during the attack on Benghazi. She heard our heroes were about to be murdered and she said, "What difference does it make?" Then, she went back to sleep. Pray this is the Democratic nominee.

I suggest TV ad campaigns featuring the parents of those four men abandoned by Hillary and Barack Obama and left to die at the hands of a radical Muslim mob, who clearly were supplied with their weapons by … Hillary and Obama. Let’s ask the parents how they feel about Hillary. Pray this is the Democratic nominee.

Is she scared of her role in Benghazi? Well, she erased 32,000 emails. She should be called "Tricky Dicky Hillary." She was a lawyer on the committee investigating Richard Nixon’s scandals. She knew all about the erased Nixon audiotapes. She learned well. That must be where she got the idea to delete 32,000 emails and wipe the server clean. Like Nixon, she decided what we the people needed to know. Then she pressed "delete." Run those TV ads 24 hours a day. Pray this is the Democratic nominee.

What difference did she make as secretary of state? Name her accomplishments? The world is in flames, the Middle East melted down, ISIS was born, Iran laughed in our face while building a nuclear program — all under her leadership. The world is a far more dangerous place. What difference did she make? Pray this is the Democratic nominee.

"We were dead broke when we left the White House." There’s another great line. Let’s play it 24 hours a day. Maybe that’s why the Clintons stole the china and furniture on the way out the door. Maybe that’s why $6 billion went missing at the State Department under her watch. When you’re broke, $6 billion can make a big difference. Pray this is the Democratic nominee.

Hillary says she is a "woman of the people." She’s one of us. But she hasn’t driven a car since 1996. Pray this is the Democratic nominee.

Hillary is all about the middle class. She has decided to make the middle class the centerpiece of her campaign for president. But "Mrs. Middle Class" demands $300,000 for a one-hour speech and a Gulfstream private jet to take her there and back.

She also gets the presidential suite at a five-star hotel, or she won’t show up. No Marriotts, Hiltons or Holiday Inns for Hillary. Run those facts 24 hours a day. Let’s see how middle-class women respond to her list of demands. Pray this is the Democratic nominee.

Hillary is all about honesty and transparency. But it turns out she bought 2 million fake Facebook fans. I guess those are the things you have to do when you ask middle-class college kids paying obscene tuition to pay for your $300,000 speeches and private jets. It must be hard to find real fans! Pray this is the Democratic nominee.

But I saved the best for last: The Clinton Foundation. The Clintons have raised more than $2 billion dollars in donations from the wealthiest people, companies and foreign governments in the world. She’s not "conflicted." Hillary is bought and paid for. If she wins the presidency, she should wear pantsuits custom designed with patches from corporate sponsors. You know, like NASCAR. She should have Penske and Valvoline patches on her pantsuits. The White House should say: "America’s House, Brought to you by the government of Saudi Arabia."

Hillary says she fights for the rights of women. Yet she accepts hundreds of millions in donations from Muslim governments that stone women, make them hide behind veils, don’t allow them to drive without a man in the car, don’t allow them to be educated, and arrest and whip them (occasionally even execute them) for being the victims of rape. She could be the biggest hypocrite in the history of politics.

Here’s a great line for TV commercials: "When a Muslim country gives a $10 million check to The Clinton Foundation, then stones a woman, what does Hillary say? ‘Thank you!'" Pray this is the Democratic nominee.

She says she fights for the rights of gays. She tweeted her horror at the new Indiana law protecting religious freedom. But she gladly accepted multimillion-dollar checks from Muslim governments that stone gays and drop them off roofs of buildings. This is the biggest fraud and hypocrite in the history of world politics. Pray this is the Democratic nominee.

Remember Hillary’s TV commercial about that important phone call at 2 a.m.? We need to run TV ads 24 hours a day asking, "When that call comes in at 2 a.m. and it involves one of those countries that gave millions to the Clinton Foundation, do you trust Hillary Clinton to make the decision that is best for America, for your interests, for your children? Hillary Clinton: bought and paid for by foreign governments." Pray this is the Democratic nominee.

And if you’re a Democrat, you’d better start praying that Hillary is destroyed before she wins the nomination — and early enough that there is time to find and vet a credible replacement. This woman is a ticking time bomb. It’s not a matter of if, but only a matter of when, she implodes or some scandal comes rushing to the surface to blow her campaign to tatters. Maybe it’ll be Benghazi. Or the 32,000 deleted emails. Or maybe it’s the Clinton Foundation. Or maybe it’s her chief of staff and constant woman at her side, Huma Abedin. That story smells worse than all the others.

But I know one thing: Hillary is the most flawed candidate in the history of politics. And I’m praying on bended knees that Hillary gets the nomination.

I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. God bless America.





Obama, Democrats And Apple CEO Tim Cook Are Hypocrites, Liars And Frauds About Indiana’s Religious Freedom Law: If gays are so important to Obama & Cook, why is Obama allowing our enemy Iran, who tortures & murders gays, to gain nuclear weapons? Why is Cook doing business in Russia where gays have no rights and in Muslim countries where gays are murdered?
If you’re going to force Christian business owners to do things they don’t choose to do, then — should a Muslim baker be forced to bake a cake for a gay wedding, should a gay baker be forced to bake a cake with anti-gay profanity on top, should a black baker be forced to bake a cake with a black man in a noose for a KKK birthday party, and should a Jewish owner of a security company be forced to secure a Nazi rally? Where does it end? But if you’re going to force Christians to do things they don’t choose to do, then the law has to be fairly applied to everyone, or it’s clearly discrimination and a violation of our civil rights.


Obama, Democrats And Apple CEO Tim Cook Are Hypocrites, Liars And Frauds About Indiana’s Religious Freedom Law: If gays are so important to Obama & Cook, why is Obama allowing our enemy Iran, who tortures & murders gays, to gain nuclear weapons? Why is Cook doing business in Russia where gays have no rights and in Muslim countries where gays are murdered?

Why Obama, Democrats And Apple CEO Tim Cook Are Hypocrites, Liars And Frauds About Indiana’s Religious Freedom Law

 

April 09, 2015 By Wayne Allyn Root — Personal Liberty

Watch the video here — http://personalliberty.com/why-obama-democrats-and-apple-ceo-tim-cook-are-hypocrites-liars-and-frauds-about-indiana-religious-freedom-law/ — or read the text of it below

Hi. I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. The religious freedom act in Indiana has been the biggest news in America for a week now.

This is all a joke, a distraction from what’s really being done to America by Barack Obama and his Marxist cabal of America-haters. Or haven’t you noticed an Iranian nuclear deal that allows Iran to gain nuclear weapons, or a new crisis of illegals at the border, or debt escalating out of control, or 40 straight months with more than 46 million Americans on food stamps, or GDP growth of zero now projected for the first quarter and a disastrous jobs report?

First let’s "out" the opponents of this law. Let me start by saying I’m a true fiscal conservative. But when it comes to social and bedroom issues, I’m a libertarian. I believe in live and let live. I want government out of my bedroom and boardroom. The government shouldn’t be regulating marriage; only churches should marry people.

And if a gay couple wanted a wedding cake from me, you know what I’d say? "How big?" But that’s just me. I’m a capitalist, I’m happy to sell my products to everyone. That’s the American way.

But if people ask me to violate my personal values, morals or religious beliefs, or if I just don’t like what they asking me to do, as a business owner, of course I have a right to opt out. I’m not hurting them, or stopping them. That’s called free will. That’s called free speech, protected by the Constitution.

The radical gay agenda is infringing on our rights as Americans, as Christians and as business owners. And it’s going to backfire. The proof is the small-town Indiana pizzeria whose owners told a reporter they would refuse to make pizzas for a gay wedding. How silly. Weddings aren’t catered by pizzerias in the first place. But instantly they were inundated with death threats and even a local coach asking others on Twitter to join her in burning down the pizzeria. The family that owns the pizzeria closed its doors and ran for their own safety.

Then something interesting happened. Americans supported them — to the tune of more than $842,000, donated by strangers on an online funding site. This pizzeria owner won the lottery. He should thank God for the radical gay agenda.

But back to the hypocrisy and fraud. First, the Indiana bill is a copy of a federal law signed by Democratic President Bill Clinton in 1993.

Isn’t Clinton a friend of gays? Aren’t gay activists supporting Hillary Clinton for president? Yet not one gay activist blamed the Clintons.

This is just like the radical feminist activists who loved Bill Clinton and never said a word as he used his position of power to have sex with a young intern.

Isn’t that the very definition of sexual harassment? If it were a Republican president, the same radical feminists would have screamed for resignation. But when Clinton was the perpetrator, not a peep from the feminists. Hypocrites.

Then there’s Obama. What a hypocrite. Iran’s leaders don’t discriminate against gays; they murder them. They throw them off roofs after torturing them. It’s barbaric. Yet Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry are doing business with Iran. Why are they willing to sit at the table with these gay killers?

And if gay rights are really so important to Obama, why isn’t the right to not be murdered for being gay not part of the Iranian nuclear negotiation? Hypocrites.

Then there’s Apple CEO Tim Cook. He’s was all "fired up" by Indiana’s new law. Yet Apple makes billions of dollars selling its products in Russia, where gays have no rights; and in Muslim countries like Bahrain, United Arab Emirates, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, where gays are murdered for their sexual preference; and in China where no one has any civil or human rights. Why doesn’t Apple stop selling iPhones and iPads in those countries? Why doesn’t Apple close its Moscow store immediately? Hypocrites.

And then there’s the Pandora’s box liberal gay activists just opened up:

• Should a Muslim baker be forced by government to bake a cake for a gay wedding?

• Should a Muslim butcher be forced by government to sell pork?

• Should a gay baker be forced by government to bake a cake with anti-gay profanity on top?

• Should a gay photographer be forced by government to photograph a rally where religious speakers are telling gays to go hell?

• Should a Jewish owner of a security company in Skokie, Illinois, be forced by government to provide security for a Nazi rally?

• Should a churchgoing Christian mother be forced by government to cater an awards gala at a porn convention?

• Should a churchgoing Christian mother who owns a print shop be forced by government to make banners for spring break that say, "Show me your breasts!"

• Should an Obama-loving liberal business owner be forced by government to rent the stage at his event center for a Tea Party rally?

• Should a black baker be forced by government to bake a cake with racist profanity and a black man in a noose for a KKK birthday party?

Where does it end? This is insanity. Government has no right to take away our rights of free will, free speech and free association. But if you’re going to force Christian business owners to do things they don’t choose to do, then it goes both ways. The law has to be fairly applied to everyone, or it’s clearly discrimination and a violation of our civil rights.

What’s good for the goose is good for the gander. I have a feeling liberals and gay rights activists are going to be very sorry they opened this door.

I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. God bless America.





Should Men And Women Of Faith Be Forced To Participate In Gay Weddings, Even If It Violates Their Faith?: Once again, the left wants to use the federal government’s power to force us to comply with its dictates. It’s the same, old dictatorial message — Obey or else!
Indiana became the 21st state to pass legislation protecting the right of Christians to exercise their faith — by declining to participate in gay weddings, for example. And the left has declared war against it. Their war isn’t about the legality of same-sex marriage. Those are now legal in most states. Their war isn’t about discrimination against gay people. There are already plenty of laws & court rulings that prohibit discrimination against gay, lesbian, bisexual & transgendered individuals. In reality, the left’s war is about wanting to force men & women of faith to participate in gay weddings, even if it violates their faith. Congratulations to Indiana for taking a stand in favor of freedom instead of coercion


Should Men And Women Of Faith Be Forced To Participate In Gay Weddings, Even If It Violates Their Faith?: Once again, the left wants to use the federal government's power to force us to comply with its dictates. It's the same, old dictatorial message — Obey or else!

Christians Are Targets In The Culture Wars

 

March 31, 2015 By Chip Wood -- Personal Liberty

Last Thursday, Indiana became the latest state to pass legislation protecting the right of Christians to exercise their faith -- by declining to participate in gay weddings, for example. And the left has gone absolutely bonkers because of it.

Hundreds of protesters rallied in Indianapolis, the state capital, demanding that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act be repealed. They contend that the law will somehow open the floodgates to massive discrimination against gays. Many demanded that Gov. Mike Pence, who supported the bill and signed it into law, be removed from office. Social media has joined the fight under the hashtag, #BoycottIndiana.

Hillary Clinton was quick to jump on the bandwagon opposing the bill, tweeting:

"Sad this new Indiana law can happen in America today. We shouldn't discriminate against ppl bc of who they love"

Get that? The woman whom many Democrats want to crown as our next president said it is "sad" that the legislators in a state would approve such a law. She conveniently ignores the fact that the original Religious Freedom Restoration Act was passed overwhelmingly in Congress in 1993 -- and signed into law by her husband, Bill Clinton.

At the time he signed the legislation, Bill Clinton said:

"We are a people of faith. We have been so secure in that faith that we have enshrined in our Constitution protection for people who profess no faith. And good for us for doing so. That is what the First Amendment is all about." [No, it's about a lot more than that, Bill. But we'll save that argument for another day.]

But let us never believe that the freedom of religion imposes on any of us some responsibility to run from our convictions. Let us instead respect one another's faiths, fight to the death to preserve the right of every American to practice whatever convictions he or she has, but bring our values back to the table of American discourse to heal our troubled land.

But gay activists won't permit a Christian "to practice whatever convictions he or she has" if a Christian believes the Bible teaches that a wedding should be between a man and a woman and declines to participate in a same-sex marriage. Such homosexual zealots believe it is perfectly OK -- in fact, it is their duty -- to force such Christians to go against their convictions.

The 1993 act put limits on such actions by the federal government. But then gays won lawsuits in state courts against a baker who refused to prepare a wedding cake for a gay marriage and a photographer who cited her Christian belief as the reason for declining to participate in a same-sex wedding. As a result, several states passed state versions of a Religious Freedom Restoration Act. Last Thursday, Indiana became the 21st state to do so (Alabama's state version is an amendment to its state constitution).

So now the left is throwing a hissy fit. And politically correct companies and institutions are expressing their concern. Even the NCAA, which is hosting the Final Four college basketball championships in Indianapolis next week, says it may move future events to another state. Oh, dear.

Let's be clear about one thing: This debate isn't over the legality of same-sex marriage. Those are now legal in most states, and I suspect it won't be long before the Supreme Court makes them legal in all 50 states.

Nor is it really about discrimination against gay people.

There are already plenty of laws and court rulings that prohibit discrimination against gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered individuals.

No, the question isn't whether gays can get married. It's whether men and women of faith can be forced to participate in their weddings, even if it violates their faith.

It's clear where the left stands on this issue. Once again, it is demonstrating its willingness -- nay, its eagerness -- to use the power of that state to force us to comply with its dictates.

Obey or else. It's the same, old dictatorial message we've heard so many times before. Congratulations to the Hoosier State for taking a stand in favor of freedom instead of coercion.

Until next time, keep some powder dry.

-- Chip Wood





The Gestapo Is Alive And Well In Obama’s America: Hitler Would Be Proud Of Obama As He Ruthlessly Suppresses Any Opposition To His Dismantling Of America Into The Land of The Dependent Free And Home of The Cowering Brave
Did you know that Obama’s Government: Is giving businesses a $3,000 incentive to hire illegal aliens over native-born Americans as even cities are hiring illegal aliens as policemen. Is using Operation Chokepoint to force legal businesses it doesn’t like out-of-business by threatening & intimidating banks & credit card processors to close their accounts. Is urging banks to call the police to report any citizen who withdraws $5,000 or more from their own bank account. Is no longer providing FEMA disaster relief funds to states whose governors deny climate change. Has created a loophole in Obama’s amnesty so illegal immigrants can vote in elections. Yes, under Obama, Hitler’s Gestapo is alive and well in the "former" Land of the Free and Home of the Brave.


The Gestapo Is Alive And Well In Obama’s America: Hitler Would Be Proud Of Obama As He Ruthlessly Suppresses Any Opposition To His Dismantling Of America Into The Land of The Dependent Free And Home of The Cowering Brave

The Gestapo Is Alive And Well In Obama’s America

March 26, 2015 By Wayne Allyn Root — Personal Liberty

Watch the video here — http://personalliberty.com/the-gestapo-is-alive-and-well-in-obamas-america/ — or read the text of it below:

Hi. I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. Barack Obama is going rogue. By every metric, the Obama economy is melting down. We are seeing the beginning stages of another recession, at best, or a total economic meltdown, at worst.

At the moment, there are no decent-paying jobs in America. Obama has opened the border and given amnesty to at least 5 million illegal aliens already in the country, thereby putting them in competition with working-class and middle-class Americans.

Think I’m wrong? Did you know the government is giving businesses a $3,000 incentive to hire illegals over native-born Americans?

Did you know cities are hiring noncitizens (and even illegal aliens given amnesty by Obama) as policemen? All you need is a work permit. Someone in America illegally can wear a badge and enforce the law against you. Don’t believe me? Ask USA Today.

Did you think the border crisis was over? Obama’s amnesty has encouraged a new wave of poverty-stricken illegals at the border.

And in a bankrupt nation with more than $18 trillion in debt, Obama has used amnesty to give illegals access to food stamps, free healthcare, Medicaid, Medicare, Social Security, earned income tax credits. And by issuing drivers’ licenses and Social Security cards, they will be able to vote immediately (because States don’t have the technology to tell the difference between a legal citizen or a noncitizen).

The Obamacare fiasco gets worse by the day. The middle class is being bankrupted by skyrocketing increases in their health insurance premiums; hospitals are being bankrupted by the flood of illegal aliens accessing services; and the economy will drown in the new debt caused by Obamacare.

Obama’s claim that ISIS is on the run is a proven fraud, ripped bare by America’s embarrassing military withdrawl from Yemen. 

Obama is going nuclear in his hatred for Bibi Netanyahu and Israel, force-feeding the world a weak nuclear agreement with Iran that is so bad, even France is fighting for stronger sanctions. Meanwhile, Obama threatens to become the first president in history to abandon Israel at the United Nations. 

But I haven’t gotten to the bad part yet. Is it possible the terrible news about the economy, the border, ISIS and Israel is all just a distraction? Because the really important news is that Obama has created a modern-day version of "the Gestapo."

The Obama government is using an initiative called "Operation Chokepoint" to force legal businesses it doesn’t like out of business, by threatening and intimidating banks and credit card processors.

At the same time, the Obama government is urging banks to call the police to report citizens who withdraw $5,000 or more from their own bank accounts. Yes, I said banks are urged to call the police when you withdraw your own money.

This comes at the same time that FEMA announced it will no longer provide FEMA disaster relief funds to states whose governors deny "climate change." 

And let’s not forget Obama used an FCC party-line vote to take over the Internet and institute sweeping new changes to a system that is working perfectly as the form of communication for most Americans.

Obama’s first goal is clearly massive new taxes on Internet usage, just another way to destroy the middle class and redistribute income. But is his real goal is controlling communications on the Internet — specifically the anti-Obama criticism and anti-government message so prevalent on the Internet.

But let’s circle back to the most Gestapo-like Obama initiative ever. It’s called "Operation Chokepoint." This is your government’s attempt to put morality controls (just like those in Iran) on the American public by shutting down gun stores, precious metals companies, casinos, tobacco distributors, telemarketers and short-term money lenders.

How can they close legal businesses you ask? By threatening and intimidating banks and credit card processors to close accounts for businesses the government doesn’t like. Just like an Iranian ayatollah, if Obama doesn’t like your business, he will "choke off" your ability to stay in business. Hence the name, "Operation Chokepoint."

Never forget Obama has been on a six-year-long relentless crusade to raise our taxes and take away our tax deduction for charitable donations, choking off contributions to churches. Yes, Obama is trying to "choke off" the funding that keeps churches in business, too.

Why is this happening? First, because Obama despises capitalism. He needs to put prosperous businesses out of business. By murdering the middle class’ ability to prosper, he creates his utopia of equality (i.e., "shared misery"), making everyone dependent on government in a classless, socialist society. Think Cuba and Venezuela.

Second, there is an obvious reason Obama hates these particular industries. The subtitle of my 2009 book, "The Conscience of a Libertarian," says it all. The subtitle was "Empowering the Citizen Revolution with God, Guns, Gold, Gambling & Tax Cuts." Is it a coincidence that virtually every item I mentioned is under attack?

The businesses on the list of "Operation Chokepoint" are all dominated by people that Obama would describe as capitalists, patriots, conservatives, Tea Partiers, Christians and supporters of the Constitution. Not coincidently, those are the same groups targeted by Obama in the IRS scandal. 

And then, of course, if Obama can’t close your business or "choke off" your ability to prosper, he can force banks to call the police if you dare to withdraw money from your own account.

Folks, this is eerily reminiscent of the Gestapo, or the Soviet KGB, or the East German Stasi. Is this the America you want? The NSA spying on your every move, the federal government in charge of your healthcare and now your free speech on the Internet, the IRS auditing enemies and critics of the government, the federal government forcing legal businesses they deem "unacceptable" out of business, and banks spying on their own customers and being forced to call the police when customers withdraw too much of their own money.

Yes, under Barack Hussein Obama, the Gestapo is alive and well in the former "Land of the Free."

I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. God bless America.





Sure, Obama Loves America — Just Like Communist Tyrants Loved Their Country. That Is, As Long As They Own It, Control It And Fundamentally Change It. So perhaps the corrupt, Marxist, Muslim sympathizing, sociopathic tyrant in the White House loves America, too.
Every socialist tin-pot dictator is the same. Everything they say is the opposite of the truth. Everything they say is to deceive & distract. Everything they do is to bribe the poor with free stuff stolen from the middle class & business owners. The politically correct name is income redistribution. But it's theft. It's the central tenant of communism & Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto. Rip off your opposition to make them poor and redistribute the stolen loot to the dependent poor, buying their loyalty & votes. That's socialism. That's every socialist tyrant. And that’s Obama — who also dictates that Muslim terrorists have "legitimate grievances" and that illegal aliens given amnesty should each collect up to $24,000.


Sure, Obama Loves America — Just Like Communist Tyrants Loved Their Country. That Is, As Long As They Own It, Control It And Fundamentally Change It. So perhaps the corrupt, Marxist, Muslim sympathizing, sociopathic tyrant in the White House loves America, too.

The Perfect Answer When Media Ask: 'Does Obama Love America?'

 

March 19, 2015 By Wayne Allyn Root -- Personal Liberty

Watch the video here -- http://personalliberty.com/the-perfect-answer-when-media-ask-does-obama-love-america/ -- or read the text of it below:

Hello. I'm Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty.

When Rudy Giuliani said he thought "Obama doesn't love America," it set off a media firestorm.

You know, those same fine ultraliberal Americans now running the mainstream media -- who, while in class with me at Columbia University, cheered the assassination attempt on President Ronald Reagan and who today, no doubt, support students at California college campuses who voted to remove the American flag -- criticized Giuliani for stating the obvious.

Naturally, the media decided to play "gotcha" with GOP presidential candidates and ask them if they agree that Obama doesn't love America. As usual, GOP candidates panicked and ran away from Giuliani's statement.

Well, I have the perfect answer to that question. Scott Walker, are you listening? 

The answer is I believe Obama loves America the same way Fidel Castro has loved Cuba for the past half century. And I believe Obama loves America the same way Hugo Chavez loved Venezuela, the same way Josef Stalin loved Russia, the same way Ho Chi Minh loved North Vietnam and the same way the socialist presidents of insolvent, bankrupt EU countries like Greece, Spain and France today love their countries.

I'm sure Obama loves America the same way they all loved their countries and their people. Yet they managed to destroy their countries and economies. That's what socialism, communism or Marxism (whatever you want to name it) does. It destroys everyone and everything it touches. Ask the people of Detroit now living in an abandoned city.

It's not a matter of patriotism. Obama may very well love America, just as I'm sure Castro would say he's the biggest Cuban patriot ever. Castro loves his people, and he will love Cuba until his dying breath.

Yet look at the results. Castro's country lies in ruins. The Cuban people own nothing, not even their own thoughts or free speech. Disagree, protest, speak out publicly, and the Castro brothers send you to prison to rot or die. People living in the country that Fidel Castro loves so much have spent the past half-century escaping through shark-infested waters in boats made of spit, glue and rubber tires.

The Cuban people were willing to die to get away from the man who loves his country to death.

In all socialist countries "the state" takes care of you. "The state" knows what's best. "The state" tells you what to think. In each and every case, all that love (and smothering state control) ruins your life.

So does Obama love America? Perhaps, but it's clear his version of love is similar to the husband who beats his wife, all the while proclaiming "I love you honey; this is for your own good."

That's exactly what Walker and other GOP presidential candidates need to say when the media ask, "Does Obama love America?" That's the perfect answer.

Watch the media turn ash white and look sick to their stomachs.

No one can prove whether Obama loves America. But I do know he is destroying America. I do know Obama is Castro.

The people I trust who have dealt with Castro -- the parents and grandparents of my friends in the Cuban community -- all say Obama is Castro all over again.

They've seen firsthand the lies, corruption, fraud, propaganda, massive taxation and regulation -- the tyrant saying with such sincerity that he loves his country and is here to "save" it. They've heard him say that everything he does is for "the good of the people." They recognize Castro when they see him, and Cubans who lived under Castro are certain Obama is Castro.

It's not just Castro. Every socialist tin-pot dictator is the same. They all channel Saul Alinsky. Everything they say is the opposite of the truth. Everything they say is to deceive and distract. Everything they do is to bribe the poor with free stuff stolen from the middle class and business owners. The politically correct name is "income redistribution." But it's theft. It's the central tenant of communism and Karl Marx's "Communist Manifesto."

Rip off your opposition to make them poor and redistribute the stolen loot to the dependent poor, buying their loyalty and votes. That's socialism. That's Castro. And that's Obama.

I have one more recommendation to GOP presidential candidates. When asked what you think of Giuliani's comments, tell them you'll answer only when they've asked Democratic presidential candidates if they agree with Obama's comments that Muslim terrorists have "legitimate grievances?"

Do Democratic candidates agree with Obama that "Muslim" and "terrorist" can't be used in the same sentence? Do they agree with his use of illegal executive orders to make law or his use of the IRS to destroy political opponents? Do they agree that illegal aliens given amnesty should collect up to $24,000 in income tax credits even though they paid no taxes?

Do they agree that $8 trillion in new debt added by Obama could destroy our economy and our children's future?

Tell them you'll answer their questions when you hear the Democrats' answers to these.

It's time to fight fire with fire. It's time to stop bringing a knife to a gun fight. This is war. This is a battle for the very survival of America, American exceptionalism, small business, capitalism, free enterprise and free speech.

Sure, Obama loves America -- just like those communist tyrants loved their country. That is, as long as they own it, control it and fundamentally change it. So perhaps the corrupt, Marxist, Muslim sympathizer, sociopath, tyrant in the White House loves America, too. You can quote me.

It's time to speak up now, before America is gone. It's time to stand up to evil. It's time to stand up to bullies. It's time to take back America from the tyrant who loves it...­ to death.

I'm Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. God bless America.





After Watching Obama For The Past 6 Years It’s Clear He’s A Psychopath and Ego-Maniacal Tyrant Who Doesn’t Care About Morality, The Law, Checks & Balances, Or The U.S. Constitution: Who will save America from Obama’s coming 2-year reign of terror? Who has the courage to stand up to the cowardly, backstabbing tyrant — certainly not two-time Obama voters, sell-out GOP politicians nor a lap-dog media "who are all sheep herded into Obama’s parasitic puppet pens”.
The OCF — Obama Crime Family — is in full enforcer mode; it smells and it smells bad. It is government intimidation & selective persecution at its finest. It’s a message from the OCF to follow the orders of Obama, or face ruin, disgrace, destruction & prison. Obama is sending a message & you can bet it was heard loud & clear in Washington. Obama is the Chicago crook of all crooks. The Marxist tyrant of all tyrants. The sociopath of all sociopaths. His last 2 years will be like nothing America has ever seen.


After Watching Obama For The Past 6 Years It’s Clear He’s A Psychopath and Ego-Maniacal Tyrant Who Doesn’t Care About Morality, The Law, Checks & Balances, Or The U.S. Constitution: Who will save America from Obama’s coming 2-year reign of terror? Who has the courage to stand up to the cowardly, backstabbing tyrant — certainly not two-time Obama voters, sell-out GOP politicians nor a lap-dog media "who are all sheep herded into Obama’s parasitic puppet pens”.

Why Not Prosecute Harry Reid, Hillary Clinton, Or Jon Corzine?

 

March 12, 2015 By Wayne Allyn Root -- Personal Liberty

Watch the video here -- http://personalliberty.com/prosecute-harry-reid-hillary-clinton-jon-corzine/ -- or read the text of it below:

Hi I'm Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. Here we go again. The OCF (Obama Crime Family) is in full enforcer mode. Obama must have been up late two weeks ago watching "Godfather Part II" on HBO. That's the movie where Michael Corleone takes revenge on everyone who has ever wronged him or his family. He kills them all.

After watching Obama for the past six years it is clear he's a psychopath and ego-maniacal tyrant who doesn't care about morality, the law, checks and balances, or the U.S. Constitution.

I've written extensively about the many times this administration has intimidated, persecuted and punished its critics. Obama has used the IRS, NSA, FDA, SEC, EPA; every 3-letter government organization possible to destroy his political opposition.

Take me, for example. I spoke out on Fox News, CNBC and on hundreds of conservative talk radio shows about the criminal actions of this socialist tyrant. During a NBC News special covering "a day in the White House," NBC's cameras even showed Obama officials panicking in the war room in reaction to my comments on Fox News.

But I'm not just any critic. I am also Obama's Columbia College classmate, Class of 1983. I spoke out publicly about how I believe he committed fraud to gain entrance to a college he never in a million years had the grades to get into. And guess what? His college records are sealed. At one point Donald Trump offered $10 million to the charity of Obama's choice if he'd just release his records.

But not a word.

What's in those records that is so deadly Obama can't let them see the light of day? You'll notice Obama released the birth certificate, but never the college records.

You think I caught his attention? Or Valerie Jarrett's? Suddenly, I was the victim of a vicious, over-the-top IRS attack. Five days after I won a complete victory in tax court, I was hit by a new IRS attack. Five days! Tax attorneys told me they had never heard of this happening in U.S. tax history.

Here's the thing folks: If someone in the Obama White House made a call to the IRS to destroy Wayne Root -- a crime was committed. As in a "go straight to prison" crime.

Well I've got news on that front. Government watchdog Judicial Watch demanded my tax files from the IRS and after a 14 month battle; we now have them in our possession. I'll release that story with scandalous new details direct from my IRS files in the next two weeks. This will be big news. I've already been in contact with United States Senate investigators.

But now Obama has gone even further; with the prosecution of Democratic U.S. Senator Robert Menendez.

It's clear Obama has tried to intimidate a member of his own crime family. Obama is sending a message to his fellow Democrats -- "Embarrass me, fight me, I'll ruin you, too. No one is off limits. I'm the king and you either follow my orders, or prepare to be destroyed."

What did Senator Menendez of New Jersey do to Obama to deserve prosecution for a minor offense? He had the nerve to publicly disagree with Obama over Iran and Cuba. Just two days before the indictment announcement, Menendez gave a rousing speech at AIPAC condemning Obama's Iran policy. Next thing you know: INDICTED. Coincidence? Not likely.

What were the charges? Sitting on a donor's private plane, then doing the bidding of the donor. Are you kidding me? Every Senator and Congressmen in America does that. They're all bought and paid for.

Hillary Clinton owed $25 million in campaign debt after her 2008 primary loss to Obama. Then she endorsed Obama and it was quietly paid off. Who made the payments? Over $2 billion dollars has been donated to the Clinton Foundation from billionaires, multinational corporations and foreign governments.

You mean there's no conflict there? Hillary never accepted a plane ride from any of these same corporations or donors who paid off her massive debt, or funded her Clinton Foundation? She never supported a bill after receiving a donation or free plane ride?

How about her new scandal: She deleted over 30,000 emails. She has multiple email accounts. They were insecure. She claims she had the right to determine which emails were private. She made the decision what to delete. This woman was involved in prosecuting Richard Nixon. It's clear she learned well from watching Nixon. She is the modern day Tricky Dicky. I guarantee you all her emails relating to Benghazi were deleted. The woman is a criminal.

How about Jon Corzine. He lost the New Jersey governor's race, went back to Wall Street, and proceeded to lose $1.6 billion (with a B) of his clients' money -- money that was supposed to be protected in escrow accounts.

But Corzine was a major bundler for Obama (twice).  Lo and behold, the U.S. Justice Dept decided not to prosecute. His life moves forward without a blemish. One critic of Obama gets indicted for free plane flights, but the Obama donor is let off scott-free for stealing $1.6 billion from innocent clients.

How about Harry "Whorehouse" Reid. He could be the dirtiest politician in the U.S. Senate. He entered the U.S. Senate with little or no assets then proceeded to become one of the wealthiest men in the Senate on a $170,000 annual salary. Really? All the while doling out billions (with a B) in government contracts and green energy "investments" that ethics watchdogs call "influence peddling."

Harry put himself in a position of great power to hand out billions. Somehow he got rich. Do you think the two are connected? But no prosecution or indictment of Harry Reid.

Interestingly, all the money that was funneled by the big Democratic donor to Menendez came through a PAC controlled by -- wait for it -- ­Harry Reid. Reid's PAC collected $700,000 of this "dirty money" then gave $600,000 to Menendez. So why isn't Harry Reid being indicted?

Senator Menendez poked his finger in Obama's eye and the government decided to ruin his life. Harry Reid has been Obama's water boy for six years, enabling all of Obama's deadly policies to take effect and blocking all attempts to slow him down. Harry is rewarded with no indictment, even though he was smack dab in the middle of the same alleged crime

Folks this smells¡­and it smells bad. It's government intimidation and selective persecution at its finest. It's a message from the OCF -- the Obama Crime Family -- to follow the orders of Obama, or face ruin, disgrace, destruction and prison. And you can bet the message was heard loud and clear in Washington.

But the worst one of all is Obama. He is the Chicago crook of all crooks. The Marxist tyrant of all tyrants. The sociopath of all sociopaths. Who will save America from the coming two-year reign of terror?

It's clear Obama is sending a message. His last two years will be like nothing America has ever seen. The question is, after my IRS attacks, after Menendez's indictment, who has the courage and chutzpah (besides Benjamin Netanyahu) to stand up to the tyrant?

I'm Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. God bless America.

-Wayne Allyn Root





Globalist Pawn John Boehner’s Betrayal Of The American People Just Delivered Amnesty For Illegal Aliens To Obama And The Democrats — With the Democrats dead to rights on Obama’s plan to grant amnesty to millions of illegal aliens with a wave of his imperial scepter, Boehner folded like a cheap lawn chair
Boehner can’t justify his betrayal. But his corporate donors will be pleased to know their supply of cheap labor will actually increase as Americans’ prospects for anything better than a “McJob” decrease in virtually direct proportion. His deep-pocket backers will be pleased to know that their grip on the reins of power — and the throats of Americans — will tighten as those corporate profits rise. In globalist gatherings such as the boardrooms of finance houses & the palaces of supranational billionaires across the world, Boehner’s backstabbing brought tears of joy. And Obama — America’s venomous, lawless dictator — is euphoric now that Boehner has sent him a love note.


Globalist Pawn John Boehner's Betrayal Of The American People Just Delivered Amnesty For Illegal Aliens To Obama And The Democrats -- With the Democrats dead to rights on Obama's plan to grant amnesty to millions of illegal aliens with a wave of his imperial scepter, Boehner folded like a cheap lawn chair

Boehner Did It

 

March 06, 2015 By Ben Crystal -- Personal Liberty

House Speaker John Boehner probably thought he would get away with it. I'm sure he expected the noise surrounding Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's visit to Congress would allow him to surrender the fort on immigration without anyone noticing. He could simply wait until the Democrats started hitching up their panties and goose stepping around in front of the cameras because that dirty Israeli hurt the delicate feelings of their beloved President Barack Obama, and then he'd wave through Obama's 5 million or so new best friends. I'm certain Boehner and his fellow globalists-first-Republicans-second-and-Americans-a-distant-third honestly believed we'd be so transfixed by Netanyahu's rather public thumb in Obama's eye that we wouldn't notice the sudden green light at the border.

As has been the case more often than not, Boehner was wrong. And his assent to Obama's amnesty-by-fiat has served to remind me that Boehner's single strongest attribute may well be his ability to reach down victory's throat and yank out defeat. With the Senate's Democratic minority using every procedural trick in the book to block progress on funding the superfluous-at-best, dangerous-at-worst Department of Homeland Security, Boehner could have simply dug in. He could have told House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi to take a powder and Sen. Harry Reid to get bent and left the increasingly self-destructive Democrats to bang their heads against the wall of public opinion.

The Democrats responded to the drubbing they endured last November by throwing the kind of tantrum that earns kids a few minutes in timeout and a Ritalin prescription. They called Americans "stupid," and then began acting as if they'd actually won a majority. Emboldened by Obama's clear lack of compunction regarding ruling by fiat, they dug in on everything from the Obamacare Ponzi scheme to Obama's other signature achievement: crippling our border security for votes through decrees like Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA). Boehner could have stopped them with relative ease. The Democrats were the ones holding the DHS funding bill hostage; and their tendency to use Twitter hashtags as negotiating ploys was alienating everyone who's ever dealt with, or even observed, a petulant teenager. The Republicans didn't have to move on immigration or on any of the president's harebrained and/or criminal scheming. The Democrats were -- and still are -- campaigning down their noses at the electorate, somehow unaware that's precisely the attitude that sent Americans reaching for the "Not Obama" lever last fall. Boehner and his Republican cronies, who were elected on promises of putting an end to Obama's and the Democrats' war on liberty, needed only to let the Democrats blow themselves hoarse while the public continues to watch their histrionics with bemused disgust. The talking point was pre-written: The Democrats are willing to shut down Homeland Security in order to deliberately make the homeland less secure.

Unfortunately, our man John might be a Republican; but he's a globalist pawn first and foremost. So Boehner, with the Democrats dead to rights on Obama's plan to grant amnesty to millions of illegal aliens with a wave of his imperial scepter, folded like a cheap lawn chair. By herding his -- not our -- Republicans in line, Boehner gift-wrapped a yes vote on a clean bill to fund the increasingly ill-named Department of Homeland Security, thereby giving the go-ahead to DACA.

Amnesty for illegal aliens, along with its even-uglier sister Obamacare, defined the 2014 election. The American people cried out in a resoundingly clear voice for an end to Obama's increasingly virulent lawlessness, and Boehner and the Republicans swore up and down that they had the cure. And now, when the symptoms threaten to overwhelm the host, they're withholding the medicine we so badly need.

Boehner can't really justify the betrayal -- at least not to the betrayed. His corporate donors will be pleased to know their supply of cheap labor will actually increase, even as Americans' prospects for anything better than a "McJob" decrease in virtually direct proportion. His deep-pocket backers will be pleased to know that their grip on the reins of power -- and the throats of Americans -- will tighten as those corporate profits rise. In globalist gatherings like Davos, Switzerland; the boardrooms of finance houses like Goldman Sachs; and the palaces of supranational billionaires across the world, Boehner's backstabbing brought tears of joy. And of course, the mood at Democratic Party headquarters is undoubtedly somewhere between "Onesie Friday" and "Transgender Slam Poetry Night at the Sustainable Coffee House" now that Boehner sent them a love note.

It's entirely possible that Boehner, without realizing it, may well have done more than simply waved the flag in front of the electoral bull. By approving the Democrats' naked vote grab -- and let's not delude ourselves into assigning any noble intentions to the people who call their own countrymen "American Taliban" and "domestic terrorists" -- Boehner may well have signed the Republican Party's electoral death warrant. At the exact moment the Democratic brand is circling the drain -- their best hope for a 2016 White House victory is Hillary Clinton's email server -- Boehner and his party boys just shoved millions of potential new voters into the Democrats' clown car. At best, it narrows the margins of victory. At worst, it could precipitate a terrorist attack on our soil. If Hollywood can envision Islamic terrorists sneaking across our increasingly porous borders, then ISIS and al-Qaida certainly can. And now, Boehner is essentially an accomplice.

But Boehner's perfidy has served to remind an increasingly liberty-minded populace that the while some Republicans are quickly becoming indistinguishable from their left-leaning colleagues, others are standing firm. With the Democrats struggling with their own crisis of confidence, perhaps this is the perfect time for a changing of the guard in the GOP. At the very least, it might be nice if the Republican leadership wasn't embodied by a guy who practically glows in the dark but somehow thinks he's stealthy. I saw you, Speaker Boehner. And I'm not the only one who did.

-- Ben Crystal





Bibi Destroys Iran And Obama With One Masterful Speech: Bibi walked onto the biggest stage in America and embarrassed Obama. He schooled him. He took him to the woodshed.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin “Bibi” Netanyahu walked into a joint session of the U.S. Congress like he was the President of the USA. He received 29 standing ovations. Bibi’s speech destroyed both Iran and Obama. What was the main takeaway of the speech? That you can’t reward bad behavior. That you must punish bad behavior. That you can’t agree to deals with tyrants, terrorists, liars, thieves and murderers whose word cannot be trusted.The leader of tiny Israel gave Obama lessons in negotiation. He showed us all what a real leader looks like: someone who stands up to evil, instead of negotiating and compromising in the face of another Hitler. Bibi made his point subtly, as subtly as a jackhammer and blowtorch. Bibi made a lot of smart Americans wish he was our president instead of Obama.


Bibi Destroys Iran And Obama With One Masterful Speech: Bibi walked onto the biggest stage in America and embarrassed Obama. He schooled him. He took him to the woodshed.

Bibi Destroys Iran And Obama With One Masterful Speech

March 05, 2015 By Wayne Allyn Root — Personal Liberty

Watch the video here — http://personalliberty.com/bibi-destroys-iran-obama-one-masterful-speech/ — or read the text of it below:

Hi. I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty.

Wasn’t that refreshing? Don’t you wish we had Benjamin (Bibi) Netanyahu as president instead of Barack Obama? I took a sampling among my friends — all smart, educated business owners, men of substance. Every one of them said if they had a choice, they’d choose Bibi over Obama for president… of the United States.

The media will concentrate on the substance of the Israeli prime minister’s speech. But let’s first look at the style. I am a business and motivational speaker who speaks all over the globe, often to audiences in the thousands. I understand communication, charisma, chutzpah and salesmanship. Bibi gets an A+ in all four categories. He delivered the speech of a lifetime.

Americans and the world just got a lesson in chutzpah. That’s the Jewish word for "balls." No one else in the world could have pulled off what Bibi just did. Talk about a masterful speech. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin "Bibi" Netanyahu walked into a joint session of the U.S. Congress like he owned it, like he was the President of the United States. He received 29 standing ovations. If you just dropped in from another planet, you might have assumed you were watching U.S. President Netanyahu give his State of the Union.

Keep in mind Bibi is the leader of a tiny nation with the population of some anonymous, obscure African nation. Yet he held court over the U.S. Congress for almost an hour like he was the most powerful man in the world, like he was the leader of America, Russia, China, the U.K. or Germany.

That takes chutzpah.

Can you imagine the looks on the faces of Barack and Michelle Obama and Valerie Jarrett. I’d have paid a million dollars to be a fly on that wall!

Can you imagine the looks on the faces of the leaders of every Muslim nation on Earth? The anger, shock, jealousy. Why Bibi? Why is he presiding over the U.S. Congress? Why are they fawning over his every word? Oh, to be a fly on the wall of the leaders of Iran or Qatar or Afghanistan.

How about the looks on the faces of the leaders of ISIS? Can’t you picture them saying: "Israel’s leader gets the attention of the world by addressing a joint session of Congress. We have to set fire to prisoners in cages to get anyone’s attention!"

And that vibe. Bibi gave off the vibe that he alone holds the key to saving the world. And just maybe he does.

Now to the substance of Bibi’s speech. Bibi walked onto the biggest stage in America and embarrassed Obama. He schooled him. He took him to the woodshed. And here’s the masterful part: He killed him with kindness! Bibi pulled off a speech ripping America’s president to shreds in front of the political leadership of America, in front of Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi, in front of the American people. And he did like only a master of communication, chutzpah and salesmanship could: by first praising him, by thanking Obama, by showering him with compliments. Then he proceeded to strip him naked and pummel him into submission.

What was the main takeaway of the speech? That you can’t reward bad behavior. That you must punish bad behavior. That you can’t agree to deals with tyrants, terrorists, liars, thieves and murderers whose word cannot be trusted.

That the only deal worth doing punishes Iran and takes away the Iranians’ nuclear capabilities until they change their behavior; until they stop supporting and funding terrorism; until they stop vowing to annihilate their neighbor Israel and kill all the Jewish people; until they check their aggressive support of militant, radical Islam all over the world. That to allow any nuclear capability for a militant Muslim nation is suicide for the entire world.

Do you understand the chutzpah of Bibi? The leader of tiny Israel was giving Obama lessons in negotiation. This was more entertaining to conservatives like me than watching "American Sniper." I asked my family to pass the popcorn.

Bibi made three great points that emasculated Obama:

No. 1: The art of negotiating. Bibi compared negotiating with Iran to negotiating at a Persian bazaar. Hilarious, and so true. "If they threaten to walk away, let them." Bibi said. "Because they’ll be back." It takes an Israeli to understand the human nature of Persians, that threat of walking away is just part of a negotiation. Bibi understands that.

Can Obama be that stupid? Bibi sure made him seem that stupid. But I know Bibi knows what I know. He just can’t say it in public. Obama is not stupid. He knows exactly what he’s doing. He’s not on Israel’s side. So Bibi had to play a masterful game of chess with Obama. So he painted him as naïve and stupid. He embarrassed him in front of the world. He made it clear the deal Obama has negotiated is Neville Chamberlain all over again. It’s a repeat of the worst deal ever agreed to: Chamberlain’s deal with Adolf Hitler.

No. 2: Secondly, Bibi made it clear that Iran is not a normal country. It shouldn’t be treated like a normal country. It is a militant Islamic country. Obama can’t even use those words. He thinks "Islamic" is some kind of compliment. Remember we’re dealing with a man who claims Islam was a founding religion of America. Bibi understands who he is dealing with.

Bibi pointed out that Iran is a rogue terrorist state no different than ISIS. Iran is the enemy of ISIS, so Bibi had to make a very interesting point. Iran and ISIS are the same people. They want the same thing. They say it. They tweet it. Iran wrote it in its constitution. They are dedicated to killing, conquering, converting and enslaving first the entire region, then the world. Iran is fighting ISIS only to determine who gets to do it in the name of Allah. Bibi then drove the nail home, "The enemy of your enemy is your enemy." Great line! I hope Obama was wearing a cup. If not, he may be down for a while.

 

No. 3: Thirdly, Bibi made a simple, clear point that the American people can understand. Forget intellectual arguments. Forget the fancy words of lawyers and Ivy Leaguers like Obama, meant to obscure, confuse, distract and deceive the people. Bibi spoke from the heart. He painted a picture of militant radical Muslims like ISIS and how they act: They cut off heads; they torture; they throw gays off buildings; they parade prisoners in cages; they set people on fire; they kill women and children; even babies are cut in half and mutilated at the hands of militant radical Muslims. And Obama wants to allow them to possess nuclear weapons? And he thinks that’s OK? He thinks they’ll change? He thinks they’ll stop being angry and aggressive with a nuclear weapon now in their hands?

No one watching can forget Bibi’s lesson: No militant Islamic state can ever be allowed to possess nuclear weapons, or it will certainly use them. No one in the world will be ever again sleep soundly. No one’s children will ever again be safe. Bibi made it clear Obama’s deal with Iran allows the country to possess nuclear weapons. It’s only a matter of when. That cannot be allowed to pass.

I think I could hear Obama and Valerie Jarrett screaming at the TV set inside the White House "war room." Bibi embarrassed them, thrashed them, emasculated them. By the way, not only is it clear Obama does not like Israel, that Obama is a Muslim sympathizer, that Obama is trying to weaken Israel and put her people in danger; but the ruler of Obama’s White House is Jarrett. Where was she born? Iran.

Obama’s actions and negotiations are no mistake, fluke or coincidence. They are not done out of naiveté. Bibi knows that as well as I do. So he had to deconstruct this president and his Iranian-born Svengali in a nice way: in front of the Congress, in Obama’s own house.

Bibi had to kill Obama with kindness. He could not win over the American people by ripping our president in our own home stadium. So he never once named Obama as the bad guy. He never once blamed Obama for a bad deal or bad negotiations. He never said out loud, "Your president is trying to hurt Israel." But he didn’t have to. We all know.

Bravo, Bibi. You just showed us all what a real leader looks like: someone who stands up to evil, instead of negotiating and compromising in the face of another Hitler. Bibi made his point subtly, as subtly as a jackhammer and blowtorch. Congrats Bibi, you made a lot of smart Americans wish you were our president instead of Obama.

And the bonus is we all got two for the price of one. Bibi’s speech destroyed both Iran and Obama. A two-for-one sale on the floor of the U.S. Congress? It’s kind of like a Persian bazaar.

I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. God bless America.





Let Me Count The Ways That Would Indicate To Anyone Who Isn’t Blind Or A Complete Blithering Idiot That Obama Doesn’t Appear To Love America, Is Different In His Thinking Than Any Other President And Certainly Gives The Strong Impression That His True Feelings Are Anti-American, Anti-Christian And Anti-Israel. It’s not a stretch to conclude the White House might be occupied by a radical extremist Marxist and Muslim sympathizer who doesn’t appear to love America.
As if questioning out loud whether Barack Obama really loves America is such a controversial thing to do. How utterly ridiculous. Well, I stand with Giuliani. I believe Giuliani is a hero for having the courage to state publicly what so many millions of Americans are thinking. I think Giuliani hit the nail right on the head. Personally, I think our president is moonlighting with a second job: as the new chief lobbyist and PR man for the Muslim world.


Let Me Count The Ways That Would Indicate To Anyone Who Isn’t Blind Or A Complete Blithering Idiot That Obama Doesn’t Appear To Love America, Is Different In His Thinking Than Any Other President And Certainly Gives The Strong Impression That His True Feelings Are Anti-American, Anti-Christian And Anti-Israel. It’s not a stretch to conclude the White House might be occupied by a radical extremist Marxist and Muslim sympathizer who doesn’t appear to love America.

I Stand With Rudy Giuliani

February 26, 2015 By Wayne Allyn Root — Personal Liberty

Watch the video here — http://personalliberty.com/stand-rudy-giuliani/ — or read the text of it below:

Hello. I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty, and I stand with Rudy Giuliani. Great job, Rudy! I just hope you have the guts to withstand the withering media attacks and stand your ground. Do not retreat. What you said was perfect. Giuliani just said what tens of millions of Americans already were thinking.

As if questioning out loud whether Barack Obama really loves America is such a controversial thing to do. How ridiculous.

Let me count the ways that would indicate to anyone who isn’t blind or a complete blithering idiot that Obama doesn’t appear to love America, is "different" in his thinking than any other president and certainly gives the strong impression his true feelings are anti-American, anti-Christian and anti-Israel.

Before we get to exact quotes direct from Obama’s mouth in the past few surreal days, let’s start with the obvious. Is it a stretch to say someone, especially an American president, doesn’t seem to love America, when he shows loves and support for communist Cuba and the Castro brothers… but shows nothing but disdain for Israel?

Is it a stretch to say someone, especially an American president, doesn’t seem to love America when he meets with gusto with the head of Jihad-supporting, radical Muslim-supporting Qatar, but refuses to meet with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu?

What about when he opens a White House terrorist summit with Muslim prayer, includes primarily Muslim participants and warmly welcomes the head of Russia’s spy agency (formerly known as the KGB), while excluding the head of America’s FBI?

What about when he refuses to admit Muslims are terrorists, while his Homeland Security lackeys label those who believe in individual rights and smaller government as the biggest terrorist threats facing America?

The media thinks it’s a "stretch" for Giuliani to see and hear all that and conclude the White House might be occupied by a radical extremist Marxist and Muslim sympathizer who doesn’t appear to love America? Maybe that’s because when I was Obama’s classmate at Columbia University, my classmates cheered and celebrated the assassination attempt on Ronald Reagan… and today many of my classmates are in the national media. Those are the "unbiased" people judging Giuliani.

Well, I stand with Giuliani. I believe Giuliani is a hero for having the courage to state publicly what so many millions of Americans are thinking. I think Giuliani hit the nail right on the head.

In my national bestseller "The Murder of the Middle Class," I predicted Obama would throw aside all attempts at moderation and compromise in his last two years as president. Since he never had to face voters again, I predicted the real Obama would emerge and that he would unleash a radical anti-American, anti-capitalism, anti-Christian, anti-Israel agenda. There is no doubt that is exactly what he has unleashed in the past few days.

We have a president who actually said Muslim terrorists have "legitimate grievances." I wonder if Obama believes the Nazis had "legitimate grievances," too? After all, both groups share the same grievance and goal: to murder every Jew in the world.

We have a president who described the attack by a radical Muslim who murdered four Jews in a kosher deli as "random folks shot in a deli."

We have a president who described 21 Coptic Christians beheaded on a beach in Libya by Muslim terrorists as just some "Egyptian citizens."

As the Islamic State beheads and burns to death prisoners in slick promotional videos, Obama’s spokeswoman proposes the solution is finding them jobs. Yes, at the direction of the president, she says this is about "jobs for jihadis." So I ask the crucial question, "Who’s hiring?" How about Obama? I hear there’s a need for White House interns. Just keep them away from gasoline and matches.

We have a president who won’t use the words "Muslim" and terrorist in the same sentence, even at a White House terrorism summit.

That summit opened with a Muslim prayer, primarily included Muslims, excluded the head of the FBI and welcomed the head of the former KGB.

Even the former head of the CIA, James Woolsey, was flabbergasted and worried by Obama’s statements.

We have a president who claims Muslims have been "woven into our country’s fabric from the first day" — even though this is a complete lie.

There were no Muslims present at the founding of America, but we did interact with them. America’s first war as a new nation was against Muslims (the Barbary Pirates).

We have a president who not only won’t tie Muslims to terrorism, but amazingly considers conservatives and anyone who believes in individual rights to be the biggest terrorist threat.

It’s not as if we don’t have a terrorist threat from radical Islam right here, right now. It was just Sunday that we heard about a serious jihadist threat against the Mall of America — with Somali immigrants in Minnesota at the center of this frightening episode.

Yet we have a president desperate to bring more and more Muslim immigrants to our country, including Syrian refugees coming direct from the home of the Islamic State, leaving even our own even intelligence community shocked and frightened.

In the midst of all this, Obama chose to scold Christians at the annual White House prayer breakfast for actions taken hundreds of years ago during the Crusades.

Obama doesn’t just blame Christians. He blames Jews, too. He refuses to meet with the prime minister of Israel; at the same time, he meets enthusiastically with Jihad-supporting Qatar.

In light of these statements and actions of just the past few days, what exactly is wrong or "extreme" about Giuliani’s statement about the president?

What conclusion would you draw? Whose side is Obama on? Obama’s thinking can only be described by any normal American as "foreign."

Personally, I think our president is moonlighting with a second job: as the new chief lobbyist and PR man for the Muslim world. Well, at least Obama has found one job he’s good at.

I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. God bless America.





The Truth Of 'Net Neutrality' And Obama's Internet Takeover: Neutrality is "a solution that won't work to a problem that doesn't exist."
Through a misinformation campaign, Obama has managed to convince an inordinate number of Americans that a lack of so-called 'net neutrality' will force you to wait hours to upload information while evil telecom executives can log-in in the blink of an eye. Net neutrality will not result in faster Internet speeds, not result in an expansion of Internet service provider choices available to home consumers, not result in a lowering of fees nor even a reduction of lag times. It will add government oversight where it is neither needed nor wanted. In actuality, net neutrality will add little more to your online experience beyond added fees. Down the road, those fees [taxes] will indubitably increase, as will government involvement with content. Ultimately, we'll end up with the Ministry of Information issuing "blogging licenses".


The Truth Of 'Net Neutrality' And Obama's Internet Takeover: Neutrality is "a solution that won't work to a problem that doesn't exist."

The Truth Of 'Net Neutrality' And Obama's Internet Takeover

 

February 27, 2015 By Ben Crystal -- Personal Liberty

The deadline for this column fell before the Federal Communications Commission's historic vote on so-called "net neutrality." However, barring an unforeseen "global warming" catastrophe, the Democrat-dominated, yet supposedly independent-by-statute, regulatory agency will have voted, probably 3-2, that the federal government should envelop the Internet in its smothering embrace. In a world where the Internet is freely and easily employed by everyone from President Barack Obama to the lowliest jihadi warming the bench for the "junior varsity" Islamic State, the Democrats have decided that they need to step in, lest "@AkbarUlulates4Allah" has to wait an extra millisecond to post to his Twitter feed.

Through a misinformation campaign conducted with almost breathless expertise, Obama, backed by groups funded by nearly $200 million of George Soros and Ford Foundation resolve, has managed to convince an inordinate number of Americans that a lack of so-called "net neutrality" will result in evil, faceless telecom companies forcing you to wait hours to upload the family Kwanzaa pics to Instagram, while evil, faceless telecom executives can log on to evilfacelesstelecom.com in the blink of an eye. Of course, anyone who is reading this is rolling down the information superhighway at speeds that were unimaginable just a few years ago. Those speeds, which would presumably continue to improve on the same curve they've followed since the days of AOL dial-up, are possible only because of the continued improvements made by the same companies that are now being accused of throttling the life out of the Web. As FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai noted earlier this week, net neutrality is "a solution that won't work to a problem that doesn't exist."

"Net neutrality" isn't what you think it is. It won't "level the playing field." It will introduce government regulation to a nearly flawless model of free-market growth. Telecom giants like AT&T and Verizon and content providers like Netflix push an almost geometrically higher amount of traffic onto broadband than they accept. As a result, the broadband providers have responded by raising rates and/or lowering speeds (aka "slow-laning") some content. Essentially, monster telecoms and content providers -- Netflix is the most famous example -- are demanding first-class seating in a 747 while paying jump seat-in-a-Piper prices. And they've managed to convince millions of people -- not to mention the Democratic Party -- that they're the proverbial little guy, standing up to the corporate fat cats. Having successfully played themselves into the hearts and minds of every selfie-posting hipster from Brooklyn to Berkeley, they've further pushed the idea that the FCC should force the broadband providers to adhere to a federally structured framework of service and fees. Gigantic content delivery networks (CDNs) will now be able to dictate the terms of their agreements to broadband providers upon pain of civil -- or even criminal - prosecution.

Think of it this way:

You run a courier service. You charge customers a rate to run documents across town. As often as not, those documents need to be signed and returned -- also a part of your service.

One day, one of your customers, a massive operation many times the size of your company, adds something to the outgoing deliveries. But it's not a letter; it's a package weighing close to 20 pounds. The next week, you deliver a few files; the massive operation sends out a filing cabinet's worth, then a storeroom's worth and then a warehouse's worth. All this time, you're using the same delivery vehicle. As the customer's outgoing load increases in volume, your delivery times begin to lag. The customer immediately complains. Your slower delivery times are causing its customers headaches. You inform the customer that in order for you to prioritize its increasingly large deliveries -- which are also increasingly larger compared to its incoming service -- you're going to have to buy a bigger truck. In order to do so, you'll have to raise its rate. The only alternative is slower delivery times, a consequence of its (ab)usage.

Rather than either agree to contend with slower -- but still extremely quick -- deliveries, buying its own vehicles and handling its own courier needs, or paying a higher fee, your customer joins with some of your other heavyweight customers and a consortium of exceptionally well-funded and tax-exempt activist groups to lobby the government to declare your courier "common carriage," set your fee schedule to benefit the customer and threaten you with fines -- or worse -- if you fail to comply. And their push is effective, because the top regulator for your industry used to be one of their lobbyists.

Six months later, you're out of business; and the customer ends up signing with UPS, which had the resources to move in and grab up the local business after "courier neutrality" stomped it out of existence -- for a much higher rate anyway.

Or, think of it this way:

Obamacare.

That is "net neutrality." It's the ultimate globalist fantasy: corporations and government working together to dictate the flow of a vital resource. in this case, it's the most vital resource of all: information. By the time this is published, the FCC, chaired by former telecom lobbyist and Obama campaign flack Tom Wheeler, will have voted its version of net neutrality in regulatory existence. Consequentially, and only consequentially, the public will finally have access to the somewhere between 300 and 350 pages that comprise the misleadingly monikered bureaucratic monstrosity. Prior to the vote, Wheeler, who was appointed to his position by Obama, stubbornly refused to allow the public access to Obama's vision of "free and open." Furthermore, he refused to discuss it publicly with the people's elected representatives in Congress. In fact, Obama-by-Wheeler refused to let anyone other than Internet superpowers like Google, which reportedly exerted direct control over some of the final language, see this magical Internet takeover plan until after it was approved without congressional or public oversight. Of course, we all remember how well "pass it to see what's in it" worked out for us last time.

Net neutrality as imagined by Obama and Wheeler will not result in faster Internet speeds, an expansion of Internet service provider choices available to home consumers, a lowering of fees or even a reduction of lag times for those of you playing "Call of Duty" online. It will add government oversight where it is neither needed nor wanted. In actuality, by reclassifying the Internet under Title II of the Communications Act, net neutrality will add little more to your online experience beyond added fees (federal "common carrier" status always includes federal taxes). Down the road, those taxes fees will indubitably increase, as will government involvement with content. Ultimately, we'll end up with the Ministry of Information issuing "blogging licenses." But hey, at least you won't have to deal with buffering the next time you watch "House of Cards" on Netflix.

-Ben Crystal





Of Course Obama Doesn’t Love America — Even the liberal media know that it’s true, but they imply racism and intimidate anyone who dares to suggest it; meanwhile, major Republican politicians know that it’s true, but they turn cowardly when asked if they believe it
Rudolph Giuliani sure stirred up a hornet’s nest by his remarks last week questioning Barack Obama’s love of this country: [“I do not believe — and I know this is a terrible thing to say — but I do not believe that the president loves America. He doesn’t love you. And he doesn’t love me. He wasn’t brought up the way you were brought up and I was brought up, through love of this country.”] He's right because if Obama did love America, he would never have said that his goal was to “transform” this country. If you love this country, you want to preserve what is best about it. You want it to continue to be an inspiration to others. You do not belittle it, apologize for it or try to tear it down as Obama continuously does


Of Course Obama Doesn’t Love America — Even the liberal media know that it’s true, but they imply racism and intimidate anyone who dares to suggest it; meanwhile, major Republican politicians know that it’s true, but they turn cowardly when asked if they believe it

Of Course Obama Doesn’t Love America

February 24, 2015 by Chip Wood — Personal Liberty

Wow, Rudolph Giuliani sure stirred up a hornet’s nest by his remarks last week questioning Barack Obama’s love of this country. In case you missed it, the former New York City mayor, who has long been known for his outspoken bluntness, set off an uproar when he had this to say last Wednesday:

"I do not believe — and I know this is a terrible thing to say — but I do not believe that the president loves America. He doesn’t love you. And he doesn’t love me. He wasn’t brought up the way you were brought up and I was brought up, through love of this country."

Giuliani made his remarks at a fundraiser in New York for Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker. In a subsequent interview with The New York Times, he denied accusations that his remarks were racist:

"Some people thought it was racist. I thought that was a joke, since he was brought up by a white mother, a white grandfather, went to white schools and most of this he learned from white people. This isn’t racism. This is socialism or possibly anti-colonialism."

While you’re never get a Republican leader to admit it, the truth is that of course Obama doesn’t possess the traditional love of country you and I have always taken for granted. If he did, he would never have said that his goal was to "transform" this country.

If you love this country, you want to preserve what is best about it. You want it to continue to be an inspiration to others. You do not belittle it, apologize for it or try to tear it down. You want it to remain, as Ronald Reagan said so eloquently, a shining city on a hill. And you’re proud that it is.

None of that describes the words or deeds of our current president — or his wife, for that matter. Remember, it was Michelle Obama who said she had never been proud of her country until her husband was elected president.

Yes, Giuliani certainly delivered a "king isn’t wearing any clothes" moment.

The liberal media went absolutely ballistic at the thought that a prominent Republican would dare to question the president’s patriotism. In no time at all, every Republican leader in the country had a microphone stuck in his face, with a reporter on the other end demanding his reaction to Giuliani’s impolitic remarks.

They were topic No. 1 on the Sunday morning talk shows, with virtually every guest disparaging what Giuliani had to say. On "Fox News Sunday," Indiana Gov. Mike Pence said, "I just don’t think it’s helpful in the public debate to question motives or question patriotism."

On ABC’s "This Week," Sen. Lindsay Graham managed to include some criticism of Obama in his disclaimer. "I have no doubt he loves this country. I have no doubt that he’s a patriot," the South Carolina Republican said. Then he added, "But his primary job as the president of the United States is to defend this country, and he’s failing miserably."

On CNN’s "State of the Union," former New York Gov. George Pataki took the same tack. "I don’t doubt that the president loves America," he said. "But I do doubt that we’re focusing on solving the problems in Washington that we need to."

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), a potential 2016 presidential contender, pointed out the liberal double-standard at work here. "I don’t feel like I’m in a position to have to answer for every person in my party that makes a claim," he said. "Democrats aren’t asked to answer every time Joe Biden says something embarrassing, so I don’t know why I should answer every time a Republican does. I’ll suffice it to say that I believe the President loves America; I think his ideas are bad."

And on and on it went. But Giuliani himself says he wasn’t backing down a bit from his remarks — even though had received some death threats because of them. "I don’t regret making the statement," he told CNN. "I believe it. I don’t know if he loves America. I don’t feel the same enthusiasm from him for America."

In an op-ed piece in Monday’s Wall Street Journal, titled "My Bluntness Overshadowed My Message," Giuliani wrote, "I hope the intention behind [my] words can be the basis for a real conversation about national leadership and the importance of confidence and optimism in framing America’s way forward."

Nice try, Mr. Mayor. But it will never happen, so long as the liberal elite who dominate the media get to determine what we’re allowed to debate and what we’re not.

Questioning Obama’s love of country clearly falls into the "not allowed to be discussed here" category. So it will continue to be the job of the alternative media, such as Personal Liberty Digest™, to expose the truth.

Until next time, keep some powder dry.

–Chip Wood





America’s Future Is Going Bad — Fast: We have to fight back and act now to take back the country from Obama and the evil destroying it. It is time to adopt MLK’s "doctrine" to defeat Obama
How bad are things? We have a president: who described the attack by a radical Muslim who murdered 4 Jews in a kosher deli as “random folks shot in a deli”; who described 21 Christians beheaded in Libya by Muslim terrorists because they were Christians as “Egyptian citizens”; who as ISIS beheads & burns to death prisoners, proposes the solution is finding “jobs for jihadis”; who has set up a hotline for illegal aliens to complain about border agents “violating their rights”; who is more concerned about the rights of Muslim terrorists, Gitmo detainees & illegal aliens than you & me; who orders the release of tens of thousands of illegal alien felons, putting them back on the streets to rob, rape & murder; who orders the IRS to audit honest citizens but gives $24,000 checks to illegal aliens


America’s Future Is Going Bad — Fast: We have to fight back and act now to take back the country from Obama and the evil destroying it. It is time to adopt MLK’s “doctrine” to defeat Obama.

Martin Luther King Jr. Was Right

February 19, 2015 By Wayne Allyn Root — Personal Liberty

Watch the video here — http://personalliberty.com/martin-luther-king-jr-right/ — or read the text of it below

Hi. I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. Martin Luther King Jr. "was fascinated by the idea of refusing to cooperate with an evil system." King believed that "the Christian doctrine of love operating through the Gandhian method of nonviolence was one of the most potent weapons available to oppressed people in their struggle for freedom."

It is time to adopt MLK’s "doctrine" to defeat Obama. Our nation is upside down. A lie is called the truth. The truth is called intolerant or racist. A Great Depression is a "recovering economy." Record cold and snow are signs of global warming. Low gas prices are attributed to the man whose stated goals and policies are to drive energy prices ever higher. The way to "save" the middle class is by taxing it more. Illegal aliens have the same rights as any American-born citizen. And, of course, we can’t use "Muslim" and "terrorist" in the same sentence, even if every terrorist attack is conducted by Muslims.

America’s future is going bad… fast. We have to fight back. We have to act now to take back the country from the evil destroying it.

How bad are things? We have a president who described the attack by a radical Muslim who murdered four Jews in a kosher deli as "random folks shot in a deli."

We have a president who described 21 Coptic Christians beheaded on a beach in Libya by Muslim terrorists because they were Christians as "Egyptian citizens." 

We have an administration that, as ISIS beheads and burns to death prisoners, proposes the solution is finding "jobs for jihadis."

We have a president who has set up a hotline for illegal aliens to complain about border agents "violating their rights."

We have a president more concerned about the rights of Muslim terrorists, Gitmo detainees and illegal aliens than you and me.

We have a president more willing to negotiate with murdering mullahs in Iran than negotiate with Republicans in Congress.

We have a president who orders the release of tens of thousands of illegal alien felons, putting them back on the streets to rob, rape and murder.

We have a president who orders the IRS to audit honest businessmen… but gives $24,000 checks to illegal aliens.

Thanks to Obamacare architect Jonathan Gruber, we know we have a president who committed fraud to sell Obamacare and bankrupt the middle class he thinks of as "too stupid to understand." He told lies, including "If you like your insurance, you can keep it." and "The average middle class consumer’s cost will go down." All lies, fraud and misrepresentation.

King advocated nonviolent resistance to fight evil. Here are four nonviolent actions we can take to slow or stop the evil that is destroying America and our children’s future:

Action 1: The New York City police showed us the first way. Mayor Bill de Blasio made clear his distaste and disrespect for the police, the same way Obama has made clear his distaste for the military, law enforcement, border agents, business owners and the U.S. Constitution.

Just as police stood with their backs to de Blasio, concerned citizens and patriots — especially Republican senators and congressmen — need to turn their backs to Obama wherever he appears.

King knew visual images like this change public opinion. Turning our backs on the individual perpetrating the evil can paint a picture that independent and "undecided" citizens need to see. They need to know it’s deadly serious and it’s time to stop worrying about political correctness.

GOP political leaders need to stop making believe we don’t have a Muslim sympathizer in the White House, a fraud willing to lie and illegally target, persecute and intimidate his critics. They need to stop making believe he isn’t a criminal willing to violate the U.S. Constitution. They need to stop making believe Obama isn’t consciously implementing a purposeful plan to destroy America by bankrupting taxpayers under a blizzard of taxes, regulations and debt and by showering illegal aliens with amnesty, massive entitlements, free healthcare and, of course, the right to vote without being citizens.

Stand up, America. We must all admit the truth and show our anger by standing with our backs to the president. What Obama is doing to America is no different than what de Blasio is doing to the New York City police. Standing with our back to Obama is a perfect example of King’s nonviolent resistance.

Action 2: We must use the courts, filing lawsuit after lawsuit against Obama’s illegal actions. On Monday, a federal judge blocked Obama’s amnesty for millions of illegal aliens. We must use the liberal trick of "law-suiting" Obama to death. How do you eat an elephant? One bite at a time! Another perfect example of King’s nonviolent resistance.

Action 3: We must use states’ rights to destroy Obama’s plans. Exhibit A: Each state, at least those led by GOP governors, should pass a law making it a crime for noncitizens to attempt to register to vote with a mandatory five years in prison, $100,000 fine and deportation after prison. Then start a PR campaign in Spanish and conduct high-profile prosecutions. Democrats will find it very difficult to get illegal volunteers to the voting booth. Another perfect example of King’s nonviolent resistance.

Action 4: Our GOP Congress must find the courage to impeach Obama. Simple. There are so many obvious and clear charges. Lead with Obama’s use of fraud to pass Obamacare. Charge Gruber and force him to give evidence and roll over on Obama to avoid life in prison for being the architect of the first trillion-dollar fraud in world history.

This is how we stop evil in America. Without resorting to violence. King would be proud.

I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. God bless America.





Obama Wants To Control The Internet: Why? To implement massive new taxes on Internet use and to control the information American citizens receive as the federal government grows more tyrannical
The Obama Administration has produced a 322-page document proposing new controls over the Internet and the public has not been allowed to see a single page of the plan. The plan is for the FCC to approve a proposal that will in effect turn the Internet into a monopoly that is highly regulated by the government. The FCC vote is to take place a week from today. Obama claims that his campaign for so-called "net neutrality" is all about making the Internet operate more smoothly for consumers. Yeah, sure. It's the same old "we're doing this for your own good" argument that bureaucrats have always used to defend their assaults on the marketplace. This is the 3rd time Obama will try to gain control over the Internet and his power-grab could mark the first step down a very slippery slope


Obama Wants To Control The Internet: Why? To implement massive new taxes on Internet use and to control the information American citizens receive as the federal government grows more tyrannical

The Feds Want To Control The Internet

February 19, 2015 By Chip Wood -- Personal Liberty

Remember when Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), who was the speaker of the House of Representatives at the time, said we had to pass Obamacare to find out what's in it?

Well, the same thing is happening today with the Internet. The Obama Administration has produced a 322-page document proposing new controls over the Internet. They're doing in the name of "net neutrality." And so far, the public has not been allowed to see a single page of the plan.

But you can be sure that any Fed proposal that is 322 pages long won't promote more freedom.

The plan is for the Federal Communications Commission to approve a proposal that will in effect turn the Internet into a regulated monopoly. And you know who will be doing the regulating! The FCC vote is to take place a week from today.

Ajit Pai, one of two Republican members of the commission, issued a statement warning of the consequences of the new rules. He said, "President Obama's plan marks a monumental shift toward government control of the Internet. It gives the FCC the power to micromanage virtually every aspect of how the Internet works."

One consequence of the new regulations, Pai says, could be massive new taxes on Internet use: "The plan explicitly opens the door to billions of dollars in new taxes on broadband­... These new taxes will mean higher prices for consumers and more hidden fees that they have to pay."

Hey, what else would you expect from another federal power-grab?

But more taxes won't be the only consequence of the new regulations. Pai warns that another will be fewer choices for consumers: "The plan saddles small, independent businesses and entrepreneurs with heavy-handed regulation that will push them out of the market. As a result, Americans will have fewer broadband choices. This is no accident. Title II was designed to regulate a monopoly. If we impose that model on a vibrant broadband marketplace, a highly regulated monopoly is what we'll get."

Tom Wheeler, the chairman of the FCC, offers a completely different spin on what's about to happen. Like all bureaucrats, he says the new regulations will be good for consumers: "I am submitting to my colleagues the strongest open internet protections ever proposed by the FCC. These enforceable, bright-line rules will ban paid prioritization, and the blocking and throttling of lawful content and services."

Barack Obama claims that his Administration's campaign for so-called "net neutrality" is all about making the Internet operate more smoothly for consumers. "You know what it feels like when you don't have a good Internet connection," he explained last month. "You try to download a video and you've got that little circle thing that goes round and round. It's really aggravating."

Yeah, sure. It's the same old "we're doing this for your own good" argument that bureaucrats have always used to defend their assaults on the marketplace.

The Obama Administration knows that there isn't one chance in a million that a Republican-controlled Congress would give a Democrat-controlled federal agency like the FCC this sort of authority. So instead of getting new legislation passed, the FCC wants to use an 80-year-old act of Congress to justify its actions. Basically, what the FCC will do is declare that the 1934 Communications Act gives it all the authority it needs to regulate the Internet today.

This will be the third time during the Obama Administration that the FCC has tried to expand its control over the Internet. Both previous efforts were ruled unconstitutional by federal courts. The latest decision came on Jan. 14, 2014, from the federal appeals court in Washington.

Pai says, "There's no reason to think that the third time will be the charm. Even a cursory look at the plan reveals glaring legal flaws that are sure to mire the agency in the muck of litigation for a long, long time."

The more tyrannical a government is, the more it needs to control the information its citizens receive. Right now, there is nothing the Obama Administration can do to limit what you read (or share) on the Internet.

Thank goodness.

But it won't take much for that to change. And this FCC power-grab could mark the first step down that very slippery slope. Let's hope Congress or the courts slap down the regulators again.

Until next time, keep some powder dry.

¨Chip Wood





Still Don’t Believe Obama Is America’s First Muslim President? At the National Prayer Breakfast Obama blamed Christianity for “terrible deeds in the name of Christ” and condemned Christians for something all warriors for every religion did a thousand years ago: kill in the name of religion. But today, only one religion is still killing like it’s the Dark Ages: Islam.
Today, there are only “terrible deeds in the name of Allah.” There is one enemy of America, Christianity & good people of faith all over the world today. It is radical Islam. It is Islamic terrorism. It is ISIL. It is jihad. How absurd for Obama to go back in time hundreds or thousands of years to try to twist logic and common sense, so as to to blame Christianity for the sins of Islam today. Obama is taking great pains & irrational leaps to cover up for Islam. Obama may not have said the exact words “I will stand with the Muslims.” But he sure meant them. Now that we know what side he’s on, just how far will he go!


Still Don’t Believe Obama Is America’s First Muslim President? At the National Prayer Breakfast Obama blamed Christianity for “terrible deeds in the name of Christ” and condemned Christians for something all warriors for every religion did a thousand years ago: kill in the name of religion. But today, only one religion is still killing like it’s the Dark Ages: Islam.

Did Obama Really Say: ‘I will stand with the Muslims?’

February 12, 2015 By Wayne Allyn Root — Personal Liberty

Watch the video here — http://personalliberty.com/obama-really-say-will-stand-muslims/ — or read the text of it below

Hi. I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. Do words matter? I think they do. I think we all need to take a man at his word. Barack Obama’s words from his own life story are under debate, yet should be of interest to all of us. Many conservatives attribute these words to Obama from his autobiography, "I will stand with the Muslims." Those were not his exact words. But his actions indicate it is exactly what he meant.

Many defenders of Obama say that is too simplistic of an interpretation and the words have been taken out of context. The reference came in a paragraph where Obama discussed prejudice against different races and religions. He made it clear that it’s unfair for people to jump to conclusions and tar all members of one race or religion with the deeds of one small group of people. Defenders of Obama believe he promised only to defend Muslims against that kind of prejudice. They interpret his words to mean he promised to defend Muslims against the kind of unfair internment faced by Japanese-Americans during World War II.

I agree Obama’s remarks are open to interpretation. The problem is his actions today are so toxic as to convince many of us that he meant the words, "I will stand with the Muslims." Judge for yourself. Actions speak louder than words.

Obama just made the most amazing statement at the National Prayer Breakfast. He blamed Christianity for "terrible deeds in the name of Christ." 

Did Obama really go there? A supposed Christian condemning Christianity for something that happened in the Dark Ages. The president of our nation condemning Christians for something all warriors for every religion did a thousand years ago: kill in the name of religion.

But today, only one religion is still killing like it’s the Dark Ages: Islam. Today, there are only "terrible deeds in the name of Allah."

Were Americans who elected and re-elected Obama like the Jews of Nazi Germany, too naive to understand or believe a leader’s own words? Hitler said he’d kill the Jews. But Jews just couldn’t believe it. "It’s just hype and propaganda to get votes," they thought. They guessed wrong.

Have Obama’s defenders guessed wrong, too?

Obama refuses to actually fight the Islamic State (which Obama calls ISIL) with a real plan. Yes, he’ll drop a few bombs from thousands of feet in the air, to make it look like we’re fighting ISIL. Yes, he says he’s got ISIL defeated. Results prove that’s an absurd lie. ISIL is stronger than ever. Ask that Jordanian pilot burned to death in a cage. Ask Kurds fighting for their lives.

Even decorated generals believe Obama has no plan to fight ISIL. But why would Obama make false claims when there is no plan? Is he stalling for time? The more time Obama wastes, the stronger ISIL becomes. If Obama stalls long enough, ISIL will become unbeatable. ISIL will be "here to stay."

But why would any U.S. President have that agenda? In that context, don’t these words ring true? "I will stand with the Muslims."

Obama has no serious interest in helping Israel defeat Hamas either. Moderate Muslim countries like Saudi Arabia, Egypt and United Araba Emirates are giving more support to Israel than America under Obama.

But why would any U.S. president have that agenda? In that context, don’t these words ring true? "I will stand with the Muslims."

Obama has left our Southern border with Mexico wide open for six long years. Even Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein believes Islamic terrorist cells have slipped across our border.

An ISIL operative claims that 4,000 terrorists have been smuggled into Western states. What kind of a president would keep our border wide open and unsecured? What could be his agenda?

But why would any U.S. president have that agenda? In that context, don’t these words ring true? "I will stand with the Muslims."

Obama (in concert with the United Nations) has suspended immigration laws to import thousands of Muslims into America from war zones like Iraq, Somalia and Syria. He’s bringing the same violent, radicalized Muslims to America who have led to crisis, intolerance, terror attacks and crisis in Europe.

But why would any U.S. president have that agenda? In that context, don’t these words ring true? "I will stand with the Muslims."

Obama and the Democrats are in such denial about who our enemy is that dozens of Democratic leaders in Congress (including the vice president of the United States) are threatening to boycott the address to Congress by the prime minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu.

Now, as if to emphasize where he stands, Obama goes back to the Dark Ages to blame Christianity for the sins of Islam today. He lectures us about "terrible deeds in the name of Christ."

Using Obama’s logic,

• Should we blame all African-Americans today for the "terrible deeds in name of the Black Panthers of the 1960s?"

• Should we blame all Germans today for "terrible deeds in name of Hitler in the 1940s?"

• Should we blame every Japanese American for "terrible deeds by Imperial Japan at Pearl Harbor?"

• Should we blame all white Southerners today for "terrible deeds by the KKK?"

• Should we blame all baseball players today for "terrible deeds by racist baseball players in the 1950s?"

• Should we blame all Italians today for "terrible deeds in the name of the Roman Empire?"

• Should we blame all American Indians today for "terrible deeds in the name of Apache Indian raids on American settlers?"

How absurd to go back in time hundreds or thousands of years to try to twist logic and common sense, so as to deflect proper blame for something happening today.

There is one enemy of America, Christianity and good people of faith all over the world today. It isn’t Judaism or Christianity or Buddhism or Catholicism; it is radical Islam. It is Islamic terrorism. It is ISIL. It is jihad. Spell it how you want. Obama is taking great pains and irrational leaps to cover up for Islam.

Yes, Obama’s words are open to interpretation. He did not say verbatim "I will stand with the Muslims." There was nuance. There was a second part to the statement. He couched his statement based on unfair prejudice and even internment. Obama did exactly what his mentor Saul Alinsky taught him to do- disguise your statements, distract the masses, camouflage your true intensions and hide your radical agenda. But at the root of Obama’s statement was the truth.

I believe Obama’s actions make the true meaning of his words clear. Obama may not have said the exact words "I will stand with the Muslims." But he sure meant them.

Now we know what side he’s on. The real question is: Just how far will he go?

I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. God bless America.





Obama’s War On America’s Energy Independence: America’s first Muslim President wants to keep America dependent on Muslim oil while he buries a cold & dark America alive
The Senate passed a bill last week to authorize the Keystone XL pipeline; Obama has vowed to veto the measure when it does finally reach his desk. And it doesn’t look like the bill’s supporters have enough votes to override that veto. Even more significant are measures Obama has taken to end the Trans-Alaska Pipeline; this would be a devastating blow to the possibility of America becoming energy independent. Obama is also doing everything possible to stymie drilling in areas of Alaska where it has already been approved. Plus, the most abundant energy resource we have in this country is coal. We should be encouraging efforts to find cleaner ways to use coal; instead, Obama has made it clear that he won’t be satisfied until every coal-producing mine and every coal-burning plant in this country has been closed.


Obama’s War On America’s Energy Independence: America’s first Muslim President wants to keep America dependent on Muslim oil while he buries a cold & dark America alive

Obama’s War On Our Energy Independence

 

February 03, 2015 By Chip Wood — Personal Liberty

After three weeks of debate, the Senate finally passed a bill last week to authorize the Keystone XL pipeline. The vote was 62-36, which means that nine Democrats joined 53 Senate Republicans in voting "yes" on the measure to complete a pipeline from Canada to the Gulf Coast. The bill now goes to a House-Senate conference committee to iron out minor differences with the version approved in the House of Representatives late last year.

It’s worth noting that during the debate over the measure, the Senate considered 43 different amendments to the bill. This means the Senate debated more amendments in one month on this one bill than it did in all of last year on every bill that came before the Senate. What a difference now that Harry Reid (D-Nev.) is no longer Senate majority leader and can’t bottle up any measure he and President Obama didn’t like!

The president has vowed to veto the measure when it does finally reach his desk. And it doesn’t look like the bill’s supporters have enough votes in the Senate to override that veto. Five other Democrats would have to split with their party’s leadership to do that.

But preventing the Keystone pipeline from being completed is only part of the war that Obama is conducting against energy independence in this country. Even more significant are measures the president has taken that could mean the end of the Trans-Alaska Pipeline.

A week ago, the president announced that he was using his executive authority to designate some 12 million acres in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (otherwise known as ANWR) as "wilderness." Such a designation would prohibit any exploration for oil and gas in that vast area.

Such a directive flies in the face of a law passed by Congress in 1980. The Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act agreed to put huge tracts of land in Alaska off-limits to exploration. But the bill also included a clause declaring that there would be "no more wilderness designations" in Alaska unless they were specifically approved by Congress. The president’s latest dictate ignores that long-standing agreement.

But this is far from the only way the Obama Administration is blocking oil and gas exploration in Alaska. Back in 2010, it ordered nearly half of the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska (NPRA) off-limits to development.

Plus, Obama’s minions are doing everything possible to stymie drilling in areas of Alaska where it has already been approved. Shell Oil has spent an estimated $6 billion on plans to drill in the Chukchi and Beaufort Seas areas of Alaska, but federal regulators have thrown up so many roadblocks that the company can’t proceed.

The same thing has happened to ConocoPhillips, which years ago bought a lease to explore in the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska. So far, the federal regulators in charge have refused to allow the company to drill a single well. And that is certainly unlikely to change while Obama is in office.

When the Trans-Alaska Pipeline was completed, back in the mid-1970s, it carried some 2.2 million barrels of oil a day the 800 miles from the northern slope of Alaska to the Port of Valdez on the southern coast. Now, thanks to decreasing production from existing wells, that number has dropped to half-a-million barrels a day.

Environmental extremists know that the economic viability of the pipeline is at risk here. If they can squeeze production even further, it is possible that the pipeline may be closed.

But here’s the kicker: Under the law that established it, if the TransAlaska Pipeline shuts down, it will have to be dismantled. This would be a devastating blow to the possibility of America becoming energy independent.

Experts say that there is something like 27 billion barrels of oil in the Arctic Outer Continental Shelf. ANWR is thought to hold another 10 billion barrels. The National Petroleum Reserve probably holds an equal amount.

That is almost 50 billion barrels of oil this country could be producing. Yet thanks to the Obama administration, we are not getting a single drop.

And don’t even get me started on the administration’s war on coal, the most abundant energy resource we have in this country. We should be encouraging efforts to find cleaner ways to use this fuel; instead, Obama has made it clear that he won’t be satisfied until every coal-producing mine in this country has been closed and every coal-burning plant has been shuttered.

What will it take to promote energy independence in this country? A change of heart by the present occupant of the White House seems extremely unlikely. So the only other option is a change of occupant.

Frankly, it can’t happen soon enough.

Until next time, keep some powder dry.

–Chip Wood





Barack Obama — Our “Black-Muslim In Chief” Who Favors All Things African And Islamic Over The Rest Of Us — Has Formed a Sinister Alliance With Saudi Arabia: This alliance is beheading U.S. oil and has set the stage for a commodity price collapse, which “could cause the worst economic crisis in America since the Great Depression”
Obama is providing much too much to Saudi Arabia where Christianity is illegal and where weekly beheadings draw large audiences. Even more disturbing is that Saudi Arabia is the world’s largest financial backer of the worst jihadist groups, including ISIS. So even as Obama promises to fight Islamic extremism, he is backing the very kingdom that is backing the crazies who want to kill Americans. Obama continues to put America more at risk each passing month. His close relationship with Saudi Arabia should alone have him impeached but he is almost untouchable because of his black heritage & his powerful friends.


Barack Obama — Our “Black-Muslim In Chief” Who Favors All Things African And Islamic Over The Rest Of Us — Has Formed a Sinister Alliance With Saudi Arabia: This alliance is beheading U.S. oil and has set the stage for a commodity price collapse, which “could cause the worst economic crisis in America since the Great Depression”.

Obama’s, Saudi Arabia’s Beheading Of U.S. Oil Will Exact A Heavy Toll

January 7, 2015 by John Myers — Personal Liberty

The price of oil is sinking faster than the Titanic. The influence on it is Saudi Arabia, which has opened up the spigots, forcing down the price of oil to $50 per barrel compared to $110 last summer. The big winner in the crude sweepstakes is Saudi Arabia, which is increasing its world market share. The big losers are U.S. petroleum and shale oil producers who can no longer turn a profit. And the man with the sword in his hands is President Barack Obama.

Obama opposed U.S. petroleum drilling even before he took office. Yet he eagerly bows to the Saudi monarch, the ailing King Abdullah. Obama has provided enormous military hardware to the Saudis even as Saudi Arabia continues to fund Sunni terrorists, including the Islamic State (ISIS). Equally startling is that Obama has set the stage for a commodity price collapse, which could cause the worst economic crisis in America since the Great Depression.

Oil insiders believe that the credit Obama has received for the stunning rebound in U.S. petroleum production is contemptible. While the president did promise to open up new areas for exploration, he also clamped down on the offshore drilling following the BP oil spill in April 2010. Obama suspended offshore drilling leases and authorized an investigation of 29 oil rigs in the Gulf. Later, his administration ordered a six-month offshore drilling moratorium enforced by the U.S. Department of the Interior. That ended only when a federal judge lifted the moratorium, finding it too broad, arbitrary and unjustified.

A Forbes headline in March 2012 declared, "President Obama Has An Oil Problem." The writer, Robert Bradly Jr., wrote: "In addition to dragging its feet on existing oil sources, the Obama administration has taken blatantly anti-oil actions."

At the same time, the Obama administration has provided enormous support to Riyadh. In 2010, the Obama administration pulled off the largest arms deal ever. It was a $60.5 billion sale to Saudi Arabia of weapons with offensive capabilities.

Now with Obama’s blessing, Saudi overproduction of crude is in full swing. Last year, petroleum prices underwent their second largest annual decline in history. That has been great news for American drivers. But the cost of Saudi oil dominance cannot simply be measured at the gas pump. ConocoPhillips, a major player in the U.S. shale industry, has announced that it will "defer significant investment" in U.S. shale oil until returns look more promising. That isn’t likely until oil prices recover to more than $65 per barrel.

Deflation: The coming collapse of commodity prices

The global impact of crashing crude is what worries me most. Last month, Goldman Sachs reported nearly $1 trillion in investments in future oil projects will not happen at today’s prices. That was after looking at what was to be the development of 400 of the world’s largest planned oil and gas fields, not including U.S. shale projects. Factor those, and thousands of good-paying American jobs will disappear.

Obama is playing a dangerous game conspiring with Saudi Arabia. If crude prices continue to fall, as I believe they will, to below $40 per barrel, it will have a crippling impact on the commodity markets. We are almost certain to see Obama’s trickle "down" economics to do far more than just cripple the budding U.S. oil shale industry. I predict that in 2015 every resource industry from agriculture to mining is going to begin a serious decline that may last until the end of this decade.

Last year, billionaire and Obama confidante Warren Buffet was purchasing up wind farms. Buffet is shrewd. In five years, wind farms may be the only farms worth owning. I witnessed it before in the early 1980s when crashing oil prices crippled not only oil- dependent states like Texas and Alaska but also farm and mining states like Nebraska, Iowa and Idaho.

I saw the farming crisis firsthand when I was 22 and writing for a cattle magazine. I already had a general understanding of the boon years of the 1970s and the enormous correction that was occurring then, in the early ’80s, because my uncle owned a 2,000- acre mixed farm. He was lucky to sell out near the top, but many of our family’s friends who knew of no other way of life were bankrupted.

During those first years as a young writer, I would sometimes be driving through farm country. I saw the devastation.

According to Neil E. Harl, an Iowa State economics professor, more than three percent of the 2.4 million farmers in the U.S. left the farm each year in the early 1980s. In 1985, the U.S. Department of Agriculture reported net farm income fell by nearly one-third during the first half of that decade. As farm commodity values declined, farmland values plunged. And that broke the backs of tens of thousands of farmers and ranchers.

Saudi Arabia and Barack Obama: A sinister alliance?

At my next job as an investment writer, I saw the same havoc in the mining industry.

The Idaho Silver Valley, which had provided so many jobs to miners in the ’70s, was abandoned in the ’80s. Those families that stayed on were mostly impoverished as mine upon mine shut down. Today, the region — including surrounding cities like Spokane, Washington, and Great Falls, Montana — is a remnant of what it was during the boon in the ’70s.

It seems Obama is providing too much to Saudi Arabia where Christianity is illegal and where weekly beheadings draw large audiences. Even more disturbing is that Saudi Arabia is the world’s largest financial backer of the worst jihadist groups, including ISIS. WikiLeaks disclosed a 2009 State Department communication by then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton which read, "[D]onors in Saudi Arabia constitute the most significant source of funding to Sunni terrorist groups worldwide."

So even as Obama promises to fight Islamic extremism, he is backing the very kingdom that is backing the crazies who want to kill Americans. Others agree, including Larry Klayman, whose article was published last Saturday by WND:

Indeed, under the "leadership" of our "Black-Muslim in Chief" — who favors all things African and Islamic over the rest of us — it is likely that the nation and the world is about to explode at any moment. Things have simply been simmering along for too long for this not to occur at some point.

Obama continues to put America more at risk each passing month. His close relationship with Saudi Arabia should alone have him impeached but of course he is almost untouchable because of his heritage and his powerful friends in and out of government. As we begin 2015, the nation faces an impending deflationary collapse.

Yours in good times and bad,

–John Myers





When It Comes To Islamic Terrorism, It’s Quite Obvious That Barack Obama, “America’s First Black Muslim President”, Isn’t Interested In Protecting Americans, Our Country Or Our Children
Obama’s words and silence about Islamic terrorism are dangerous; but here are some of Obama’s actions that are even more dangerous: When a unity rally against Islamic terrorism was held in Paris recently, 40 world leaders were there, but not Obama nor any top U.S. officials. Obama has left our borders wide open for terrorists. Obama has suspended immigration laws to import thousands of Muslims who are the same violent radicals who have caused terror attacks & crisis in Europe. Obama has repeatedly condemned Israel for defending itself. Obama has banned the word “Islamic” from being associated with terrorism in FBI, law enforcement and military manuals. Obama is releasing radical Islamic leaders from Gitmo, even a nuclear terrorist, many who have already vowed to kill more Americans.


When It Comes To Islamic Terrorism, It’s Quite Obvious That Barack Obama, “America’s First Black Muslim President”, Isn’t Interested In Protecting Americans, Our Country Or Our Children

When It Comes To Islamic Terrorism, is Obama On Our Side?

January 15, 2015 By Wayne Allyn Root — Personal Liberty

Watch the video here — http://personalliberty.com/comes-islamic-terrorism-obama-side/ — or read the text of it below:

Hi. I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. As a kid, we used to say: "Sticks and stones can break my bones, but words can never hurt me." We were wrong. Words are dangerous. Words can be deadly. Words (or the lack of them) can inspire terrorism. As radical Islamic jihad threatens our countries, our children and our free speech, there is a new Neville Chamberlain. His name is Barack Hussein Obama.

The problem is in the words Obama says and doesn’t say. The words he uses to praise Islam and the words he refuses to say to denounce radical Islam are dangerous to America.

Ask any general. The key to fighting a war is to know your enemy. In the history of warfare, no one has ever been afraid to say the enemy’s name out loud. Until now. Until Obama.

Why can’t Obama connect the words "Islam" and "terrorism"? It’s not as if there isn’t enough evidence:

• 9/11 was Islamic terrorism.

• The Madrid train bombing was Islamic terrorism.

• The London subway bombings were Islamic terrorism.

• The Mumbai, India, hotel attack was Islamic terrorism.

• The Kenyan mall attack was Islamic terrorism.

• The Benghazi embassy attack was Islamic terrorism.

• The burning of entire villages and wholesale murder of women and children in Nigeria is Islamic terrorism.

• The murder of more than 100 innocent children at one school in Pakistan was Islamic terrorism.

• The attack on Canada’s Parliament was Islamic terrorism.

• The Boston bombing and Fort Hood massacre was Islamic terrorism.

• The beheadings and slaughter of thousands of women and children by ISIS is Islamic terrorism.

• The attack on the coffee shop in Australia was Islamic terrorism.

• The attack and murder only days ago of cartoonists in Paris were very much Islamic terrorism.

If our President can’t put those two words together — if he can’t say "Islamic" and "terrorism" in the same sentence — then something is very wrong. Remember this is the same guy who denies that ISIS has anything to do with Islam.

It’s clear to anyone but an idiot or a liberal (I know, I repeat myself) that the world’s enemy is radical Islam. But sadly, it’s more not just "radical Islam." Let’s stop being politically correct. Islam itself is a problem. Millions of Muslims who aren’t "radical" support and even celebrate intolerance and terrorism.

This is a battle being fought since the Crusades. Even Thomas Jefferson, the original libertarian isolationist, made an exception for Islam. Jefferson wanted no wars, no big military expenditures and no "entangling alliances." Yet under Jefferson, we fought five long years of war versus Islamic terrorists (then called Barbary pirates).

As you can see, nothing much has changed. Call it Islam, call it radical Islam, call it jihad or call it fundamental Islam. The fact is Islam is producing hate, intolerance and death. Yes, it is the radical faction that wants to kill us, murder our children, drop gays from rooftops, stone women who show an inch of ankle, throw acid in the face of girls who dare try to educate themselves and, worst of all, murder anyone who speaks, writes or even draws cartoons with which they disagree. But there is more at work here than just a few "radicals."

I was born a Jew. My relatives were murdered in Germany. Not every German was a Nazi murderer. But almost every German went along with the Holocaust. They knew what was happening. They let it happen. They remained silent while 6 million Jews were tortured, enslaved and gassed. That made them complicit in the murders.

What is happening today is eerily similar. Not all Muslims are bad people. Ninety-five percent will never murder anyone. Ninety-five percent will never be a terrorist. But like Germans of the Nazi era, most Muslims remain silent about the horrific acts of their brothers and sisters.

Even Muslims in America are guilty of silence. Have you seen any marches in Detroit by American Muslims denouncing terrorism? That makes them complicit. You are either for intolerance, terrorism and murder… or against it.

And that is why what Obama doesn’t say is such a problem. He, too, is silent. He, too, refuses to place blame on Islam. He refuses to call it what it is: Islamic terrorism or jihad. He refuses to call out American Muslims for not taking a strong public stand against terrorism.

Obama’s words (or the lack thereof) are dangerous. But his actions are even more dangerous. Here are but a few:

• When a "unity rally" against Islamic terrorism was held in Paris this past Sunday, more than 40 world leaders were there. But not Obama, Joe Biden, John Kerry or Eric Holder. The U.S. sent no top officials to attend. Even Turkey’s prime minister participated in the rally that Obama had no time to join. But Obama sent three White House officials to the funeral of thug Michael Brown. What was the message to the world? Maybe the important question is what message was Obama sending to radical Islamic terrorists?

• Obama has left our borders wide open for terrorists. ISIS and al-Qaida terrorist cells are very likely in this country right now, ready to attack. Don’t take my word for it. Democratic U.S. Sen. Diane Feinstein just announced it. It’s a shame she doesn’t understand her own president is the enabler.

• Obama (in concert with the United Nations) has suspended immigration laws to import thousands of Muslims from war zones like Iraq, Somalia and Syria.

• He’s bringing the same violent, radicalized Muslims to America that have led to crisis, intolerance, terror attacks and crisis in Europe.

• Obama has repeatedly condemned Israel for defending itself.

• It was Obama who in 2010 criticized the now-infamous French magazine Charlie Hebdo for daring to publish cartoons offensive to Islam.

• It was the Obama administration who banned the word "Islamic" from being associated with terrorism in FBI, law enforcement and military manuals.

• Obama’s negotiations with Iran over its right to build a nuclear bomb can best be described as "surrender."

• Obama is releasing radical Islamic leaders from Gitmo, many who have already vowed to kill more Americans.

• He’s even freed a nuclear terrorist.

What is Obama’s agenda? It certainly isn’t to protect Americans, our country or our children.

Does Obama suffer from complete ignorance? Crippling political correctness? Is he blinded by his childhood in Indonesia? I don’t know. But I know something is wrong.

Forget "I am Charlie." We should all be asking publicly: "Who is Obama, and what is Obama’s agenda toward Islamic terrorism? Is he on our side? Is he here to help us, or to hurt us?"

I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. God bless America.





The Amazing Arrogance And Stupidity Of Barack Obama: Obama is proof of the saying — “Liars make the best promises.”
In his SOTU address, a smug, arrogant Obama declared mission accomplished on multiple fronts. He gloated that the economy is booming, he has defeated ISIS, the recession is over, and we should ignore any mention of hard times. Really? If Bush was dumb and arrogant for announcing mission accomplished, what does that make Obama for repeating the same mistake? Is there a word for stupid squared? The Great Recession isn’t over and we are in the eye of an economic hurricane. Remember, it’s calm and quiet in the eye of a hurricane. It seems like the worst is over. But the worst is yet to come — it’s on the other side of the eye. Actual facts make it clear that there is no recovery, the recession isn’t over, the economy is imploding, Obama has made ISIS stronger than ever, and hard times are getting harder. Obama is proof of the saying — “Liars make the best promises.”


The Amazing Arrogance And Stupidity Of Barack Obama: Obama is proof of the saying — “Liars make the best promises.”

The Amazing Arrogance And Stupidity Of Barack Obama

January 29, 2015 by Wayne Allyn Root — Personal Liberty

Watch the video here — http://personalliberty.com/amazing-arrogance-stupidity-barack-obama/ — or read the text of it below

I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. Remember when George W. Bush damaged his presidency and legacy by arrogantly proclaiming "mission accomplished" on an aircraft carrier as he announced the end of our wars in Iraq and Afghanistan? He looked foolish when thousands more American soldiers came home in body bags and tens of thousands more were badly injured.

The reality Bush didn’t understand was that this was only the beginning of a guerrilla war using terrorist tactics. The biased liberal media, of course, never let the American public forget Bush’s mistake. They called him dumb and arrogant.

The question now is what do you call someone stupid enough to repeat the same mistake as his predecessor? You call him Barack Obama.

In his State of the Union address, a smug, arrogant Obama just declared "mission accomplished" on multiple fronts. He gloated that the economy is booming and the "fact" that he has defeated ISIS. Obama told Americans the recession is over, that it’s time to move on. He said it’s old news and it’s time to ignore any mention of hard times.

Really? If Bush was dumb and arrogant for announcing "mission accomplished," what does that make Obama for repeating the same mistake? Is there a word for stupid squared?

It’s clear ISIS isn’t defeated. If anything, ISIS is getting stronger every day. The terrorists are laughing in our face as they behead more hostages, capture more territory and actually publicly threaten the president of the United States.

And the economy? Within days of Obama’s State of the Union "mission accomplished" speech, bad economic news came in droves. Obama’s policies and never ending new regulations are not helping the economy; they are destroying it.

Only days after Obama’s speech, it was disclosed that 50,000 bank employees were laid off in December (only days before the speech). Yes, I said 50,000 in one month.

But Wall Street wasn’t alone. EBay announced massive layoffs only days after Obama’s State of the Union — about 7 percent of its workforce.

American Express just laid off 4,000 employees (about 6 percent of its workforce).

Baker Hughes announced layoffs of 7,000 (about 11 percent of its workforce) the same week.

Energy and oil companies announced the layoffs of thousands and predicted 20,000 more could lose their jobs in one North Dakota town by summer.

Forbes is reporting that IBM will soon announce layoffs of 100,000 employees (25 percent of its workforce), although IBM denies that number.

Teen clothing retailer Wet Seal just declared bankruptcy and closed 338 stores.

Retailers like Macy’s and J.C. Penny are closing stores and laying off thousands of employees. Retailers are closing thousands of stores after a poor Christmas shopping season and laying off hundreds of thousands of employees. A poor Christmas shopping season? Funny, but that doesn’t sound like Obama "saved" the economy, does it?

Durable goods orders in America have literally collapsed.

Earlier this week, the stock market plunged 500 points on news of disastrous earnings reports from major companies across the U.S. Not only are companies reporting terrible fourth-quarter results, but they are severely downgrading their 2015 sales and profits predictions.

More terrible news. The entire EU is on the verge of collapse. It just happens to be America’s No. 1 trading partner.

Recovery? For the first time in history, a majority of public school students in America live in poverty.

For the first time in history, more businesses are failing each day than opening.

For the first time in history, there are more people on welfare, food stamps and other handouts than working in the private sector.

Americans on disability are up by 50 percent.

Food stamp use topped 46 million for the 38th straight month.

We have the lowest workforce participation rate in modern history.

Almost 100 million working-age Americans aren’t working. 

And 107 million Americans are on some form of welfare. Is it a coincidence that about the same number are unemployed as collecting welfare?

And all of this "success" and "saving" of the economy was achieved by adding $8 trillion to the national debt in only six years. Obama has exploded the debt by an unimaginable 70 percent.

The Director of the CBO just called the debt "unsustainable" and predicts we are the verge of fiscal crisis.

Not surprisingly, economist Robert Johnson reports the wealthiest hedge fund managers and other assorted Wall Street bankers and billionaires fear instability, unrest and riots and are busy buying farms in New Zealand to escape the violence to come.

Oh, and even if you believe the lie that the economy is doing wonderful, it’s all at the expense of our future. Interest rates are at zero. Raise them even a few points and just the interest on our skyrocketing debt will eat up the entire U.S. budget. Now add in the cost of Obamacare (just revealed at $50,000 per person over the next decade), and all the taxes in the world won’t pay for the interest on the debt. Our economy will be overwhelmed. Like Humpty Dumpty, no one will ever be able to pick up the pieces again.

The Great Recession isn’t over. We may actually be in the eye of an economic hurricane. Remember, it’s calm and quiet in the eye of a hurricane. It seems like the worst is over. But the worst is yet to come — it’s on the other side of the eye.

The stats above make it clear there is no recovery. Obama didn’t "save" the economy. He simply lied… again. He just made it up. Obama is proof of the saying "Liars make the best promises."

So now you can add to the list of the great lies of all time:

• "Mission accomplished."

• "If you like your insurance, you can keep it."

• "The shadow of the crisis has passed… Tonight we turn the page…"

Those words are a testament to the arrogance and stupidity of Obama. Get ready for the second more deadly half of the hurricane.

I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. God bless America.





Gallup CEO: 5.6 Percent Unemployment Is a "BIG LIE": The official unemployment rate cruelly overlooks the suffering of the long-term and often permanently unemployed as well as the depressingly underemployed
Gallup CEO: The labor force is shrinking so the population included in the tabulation of unemployment data doesn't include the massive number of otherwise-eligible people who've given up looking for work. If anyone is unemployed and has given up on finding a job for over 4 weeks, they aren't counted as unemployed. Plus, if you perform a minimum of one hour of work in a week and are paid at least $20, you're not counted as unemployed; and part-time workers who want to obtain full-time work don't count as unemployed. The U.S. is delivering at a staggeringly low rate of 44% for the number of full-time jobs as a percentage of the adult population, 18 years and older. That needs to be 50% and a bare minimum of 10 million new, good jobs to replenish America's middle class.


Gallup CEO: 5.6 Percent Unemployment Is a "BIG LIE": The official unemployment rate cruelly overlooks the suffering of the long-term and often permanently unemployed as well as the depressingly underemployed

Gallup CEO: 5.6 Percent Unemployment Is A "Big Lie"

February 03, 2015 By Ben Bullard -- Personal Liberty

Gallup CEO Jim Clifton has been shooting from the hip lately. Last month, he wrote a lengthy piece drawing on his polling company's data to bemoan the decline of entrepreneurship in America. Now comes an opinion piece from Clifton that flatly disputes the "extremely misleading" unemployment rate promulgated by the Department of Labor.

"Right now, we're hearing much celebrating from the media, the White House and Wall Street about how unemployment is 'down' to 5.6%," Clifton wrote Tuesday. "The cheerleading for this number is deafening. The media loves a comeback story, the White House wants to score political points and Wall Street would like you to stay in the market."

But, he concludes: "There's no other way to say this. The official unemployment rate, which cruelly overlooks the suffering of the long-term and often permanently unemployed as well as the depressingly underemployed, amounts to a Big Lie."

Why does he think this? For the same reason we've been writing stories like this one, and this one, and this one: The labor force is shrinking, so the population included in the tabulation of unemployment data doesn't include the massive -- and growing -- number of otherwise-eligible people who've given up looking for work.

As for the politicians who love to tout the official unemployment line?

None of them will tell you this: If you, a family member or anyone is unemployed and has subsequently given up on finding a job -- if you are so hopelessly out of work that you've stopped looking over the past four weeks -- the Department of Labor doesn¡¯t count you as unemployed. That's right. While you are as unemployed as one can possibly be, and tragically may never find work again, you are not counted in the figure we see relentlessly in the news -- currently 5.6%. Right now, as many as 30 million Americans are either out of work or severely underemployed. Trust me, the vast majority of them aren't throwing parties to toast "falling" unemployment.

Clifton, who obviously knows a little bit about data-collection methods, also offers this seldom-considered fact:

There's another reason why the official rate is misleading. Say you're an out-of-work engineer or healthcare worker or construction worker or retail manager: If you perform a minimum of one hour of work in a week and are paid at least $20 -- maybe someone pays you to mow their lawn ¡-- you're not officially counted as unemployed in the much-reported 5.6%. Few Americans know this.

Additionally, the "underemployed" -- part-time workers who are striving to obtain full-time work -- don't factor into the Labor Department's unemployment figure. "If you have a degree in chemistry or math and are working 10 hours part time because it is all you can¡­ the government doesn't count you in the 5.6%," writes Clifton.

Gallup offers an alternative method for calculating the percentage of Americans engaged in full-time work as a proportion of the total working-age population: the payroll-to-population figure, which contrasts the number of people who hold jobs working 30 or more hour per week with the total population.

"Right now, the U.S. is delivering at a staggeringly low rate of 44%, which is the number of full-time jobs as a percent of the adult population, 18 years and older," Clifton observes. "We need that to be 50% and a bare minimum of 10 million new, good jobs to replenish America's middle class."





Barack Obama’s Dangerously Wrongheaded State Of The Union Speech. What planet did he just come from?
What Obama said or refused to say certainly bore no resemblance to where this country is today. The same old agenda was there. Raise taxes on the rich. Bamboozle the public with all sorts of free stuff. Of all the exaggerations and omissions in the president’s speech, the biggest on the domestic front was how well the economy has been doing under his watch. The only way he can claim that unemployment has come down is to not count the millions of people who no longer even bother to look for work; and to give full credit to the millions more who would love to work full time, but can find only part-time jobs. Things may look pretty good in our nation’s capital. But out in the real world, most people are barely getting by — if that. And he failed to mention the divisions that he is promoting among us, whether it is rich versus poor, black versus white or any other contrived conflict.


Barack Obama’s Dangerously Wrongheaded State Of The Union Speech. What planet did Obama just come from?

Barack Obama’s Dangerously Wrongheaded State Of The Union Speech

January 21, 2015 — By Chip Wood — Personal Liberty

What planet did he just come from?

That was the first question that occurred to me after listening to the president’s State of the Union speech two nights ago. Because what he said — and maybe even more important, what he refused to say — certainly bore no resemblance to where this country is today or took into account the events of the past few months.

If a viewer had somehow slept through the elections two months ago and awoke just time for Obama’s hourlong peroration on Tuesday night, he would have assumed that the Democrats were the big winners in the midterm contests. There certainly wasn’t anything in the president’s remarks to indicate that he was speaking to the fewest number of Democrats to occupy Congress in a long time.

Talk about the same old same old progressive agenda; it was all there. Raise taxes on the rich. Bamboozle the public with all sorts of "free" stuff: free child care for working parents, free college when they grow up and free sick leave when they get a job.

The president said it was time to "turn the page" and work together for a better future. But every time he mentioned a way to do this, it was only to push for another government program, virtually none of which have a chance of passage in the current Congress — and Obama knows it.

Of all the exaggerations and omissions in the president’s speech, the biggest on the domestic front was how well the economy has been doing under his watch. The only way he can claim that unemployment has come down is to not count the millions of people who no longer even bother to look for work. Oh, and to give full credit to the millions more who would love to work full time, but can find only part-time jobs.

Things may look pretty good in our nation’s capital. But out in the real world, most people are barely getting by — if that.

When it comes to combating Islamic terrorism (a phrase the president still refuses to use), Obama said "the shadow of the crisis has passed." Oh, really? That certainly doesn’t seem to be the case in Yemen. Or in Paris. Or where ISIS can murder 13 boys, just because they were caught watching soccer on television.

Of all the empty promises and rhetorical flourishes in the president’s remarks, it was a challenge to pick out the one that was the most wrongheaded. For me, it came near the end of his remarks, when Obama said it was time for us all to "debate without demonizing each other."

Coming from the most divisive president to occupy the White House in years, lecturing anyone about "demonizing" issues took a ton of chutzpah. But that’s something Obama has never lacked. He is a master of promoting divisions among us, whether it is rich versus poor, black versus white or any other contrived conflict.

I haven’t seen any numbers on how many people actually watched the president’s State of the Union remarks. But I suspect it garnered the smallest audience he’s had in the six times he’s given this address to a joint session of Congress. That’s certainly been the trend, with every speech since the first one drawing a smaller and smaller audience.

No doubt many who tuned in at the beginning switched channels, or just turned off their TV, before it was over. Far fewer hung around long enough to hear the Republican response, which was delivered by Joni Ernst, the newly elected senator from Iowa.

That’s too bad. Because those who missed Ernst’s rebuttal didn’t see a rising star in Republican ranks. And unlike the president, Ernst stressed the significance of the November elections. "We heard the message you sent in November, loud and clear," she said. "And now we’re getting to work to change the direction Washington has been taking our country."

Those of us who believe that "middle-class economics" means working for what you get, paying your way and staying within your means hope she is correct. And we hope that the Republicans who now control both branches of Congress will put an end to the liberal refrain of more spending, higher taxes, greater debt and increasing dependence on government.

Yes, it is high time for a change. Let’s see if we get one — despite what our president says.

Until next time, keep some powder dry.

–Chip Wood





An Important Message For Bill Maher And All The Other Media Members Of The Liars For Obama Club
Obama has rigged the system to make the stock market go up to hide the fact that he’s piling up the most debt in world history, destroying the middle class and driving most of the workforce into poverty & government dependency. Obama says inflation is low. Really? Electric rates, health insurance premiums, college costs & food to feed your family are at all-time highs. But our corrupt government removed all of these middle-class staples of life from their inflation index. While they claim no inflation, we have no jobs, no wage increases for anyone lucky enough to still have a job and massive inflation on all the products that matter. The entire Obama economic recovery is all based on lies, misrepresentations, pure fraud, higher taxes, massive debt & transfer of money from the middle class to the poor & the corporate elite. The rest of us are either drowning or hanging on for dear life.


An Important Message For Bill Maher And All The Other Media Members Of The Liars For Obama Club

An Important Message For Bill Maher

January 22, 2015 By Wayne Allyn Root — Personal Liberty

Watch the video here — http://personalliberty.com/important-message-bill-maher/ — or read the text of it below:

Hi. I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. And I have an important message for Bill Maher and his HBO show: Stop lying!

I sat in amazement watching Maher’s HBO show a couple of weeks ago. How many lies, exaggerations, misrepresentations and delusions can HBO — and guests like Jay Leno and even Republican Carla Fiorina — allow Maher to get away with in one show? Yes, Maher is only a comedian and entertainer, not a serious journalist. But here’s why it matters. Maher’s lies and propaganda are exactly the same lies as those told by every Obama supporter, Democratic members of Congress and the mainstream media.

Each of these lies is easily debunked. That’s why Maher only allows conservative guests who are boring, weak-willed, milquetoast and afraid to challenge him — and makes certain they are outnumbered and intimidated.

Call out the lies and aggressively debate Maher, and he won’t allow you on the show ever again. How do I know? Because it happened to me. I was a guest on Maher’s show "Politically Incorrect" four times in one year. His producers told me that was more than any other guest in America that year. Maher’s producers said they booked me repeatedly because I was (and I quote) "a dynamic, entertaining communicator and one of the few guests gutsy enough to aggressively debate Bill." I actually got ovations from his liberal audience.

That was a combination Maher could not allow. And after my fourth appearance, the producers told me Maher would never allow me on the show again. The irony is this is the same man who spent half his show defending the importance of "free speech" in the wake of the jihadist terrorist attack in France.

Each week, Maher finds a way to label anyone with my conservative and capitalist views "radical" and "extreme." That’s despite the fact that only 11 weeks ago these same views won in the biggest national landslide in the history of modern politics. That’s despite the fact that polls prove that in all 50 states conservatives outnumber those identifying themselves as liberals.

When liberals like Barack Obama, Harry Reid or media hotshots like Maher call popular views like mine "radical" and "extreme," they are lying and committing slander. This slash-and-burn strategy was created by communist Saul Alinsky. They get away with it by repeating the lie again and again — and by banning anyone who can win a debate from appearing on the same stage.

Maher’s show has deteriorated into three or four liberals ganging up (bullying is probably the right word) against one frightened and intimidated conservative. Those of us who can’t be bullied are banned from Maher’s show.

Since Maher is too insecure to debate me face to face, let me tackle his lies right here.

The narrative provided by Maher is that the Obama economy is doing great: GDP is up dramatically, unemployment is way down, healthcare costs are down and Obama has lowered the deficit. Maher basically dared the GOP to run against the magnificent Obama economy. These are the same lies told by every Democratic member of Congress, and the GOP lets them get away with these lies. Here is how you debunk them.

First, no sooner was I out in the media trashing this idea that we are in "recovery" and Obama policies have produced a good economy than the news came out that 50,000 jobs were terminated last month in just one industry: banking.

Why were they terminated? Because bank revenues are the lowest in eight decades. What was eight decades ago? That was smack dab in the middle of the Great Depression. Does that sound like a good economy to you?

The economy is not "recovering" or "healthy" for anyone but corporate elite and billionaires, although the news of 50,000 bank employees terminated in one month may be proof even the corporate elite are now joining the suffering. Join the club. Main Street and small business have been dying for six long years under Obama. Just as my bestselling book, "The Murder of the Middle Class" warned, the American middle class has been systematically slaughtered. For the first time in history, our middle class is no longer No. 1 in the world; Canada’s is.

For the first time in history, more businesses are failing each day than opening.

For the first time in history, there are more people on welfare, food stamps and other handouts than working in the private sector.

We have the lowest workforce participation rate in modern history.

For men, it’s the lowest in recorded history.

As a matter of fact, there is only one place in all of America where the labor participation rate rose under Obama: Washington, D.C. The only one hiring is Obama, and he’s doing it with your taxpayer money!

Almost 100 million working-age Americans aren’t working.

In this Obama economy, 40 percent of American workers now earn less than the minimum wage in 1968.

Some 107 million Americans are on some form of welfare.

If we add in Medicare, Medicaid and people working for government, more than 165 million Americans — about half the population — are dependent on a government check.

This is Maher’s definition of success? This cannot go unchallenged by conservatives.

Obama’s supporters claim healthcare costs are down while GDP is up. Really? Here are the facts. Health insurance premiums have gone up more in the past year than in the eight years prior to Obamacare.

In California individual health insurance premiums are up as much as 88 percent.

Many families across the country are paying double or triple, yet are stuck with higher deductibles and fewer benefits.

And that is precisely why GDP was up. Almost the entire increase in third quarter GDP was fueled by the massive increase in healthcare costs due to Obamacare.

So let me get this scam correctly. Obama’s voters get "free" healthcare, while middle-class America and small business gets bankrupted with the huge bill. Our health insurance premiums are skyrocketing, destroying our quality of life, and Obama calls that proof that GDP is up. That’s an achievement?

Conservatives need to attack aggressively. The idea that GDP is rising because of higher healthcare costs that are bankrupting middle-class Americans is not a reason to celebrate. It’s a reason to hang Democrats!

But wait, the lies get bigger. If the GDP increase for one quarter was primarily produced by increased healthcare spending, then how can Obama’s defenders claim that healthcare spending is down? Where did they get that lie from? Jonathan Gruber? The left just makes up lies, and no one challenges them. My health insurance bill went from $500 per month to $1,700 under Obama. Challenge these lies. This message will resonate with middle-class consumers (and voters).

Next, Obama’s defenders claim unemployment is down. How could it be down if the workforce participation rate is the lowest in history? The answer is fraud. The government doesn’t count the people no longer looking for jobs or who don’t want a job (who would rather sit home collecting welfare). True unemployment is at Great Depression levels.

Worse, the jobs being created are crappy, low-wage, part-time jobs.

I’m basing this on facts. Think of the most liberal city in America: New York City. From 2008 to 2013, only 194,000 jobs were created in New York City. That’s a disaster. But listen to this: 191,000 of them were low-wage or part-time jobs. Only 3,000 were middle-class jobs.

Can you imagine what liberals would say if a white Republican were president and every job created was flipping burgers, mowing lawns or cleaning toilets? They’d say he was trapping minorities in a life of poverty and hopelessness. But a black liberal president receives congratulations. Amazing.

Democrats also crow about the stock market under Obama. Republicans go along with this narrative. Well, a rising stock market based on good news and positive economic fundamentals would be great. But a rising stock market based on fake money printing by the Fed, misleading economic stats and massive debt is not so great. Actually, it’s a tragedy. Our stock market under Obama resembles the subprime mortgage crisis. It’s a debt bubble about to pop.

The stock market is up because Obama has added almost $8 trillion in debt. Fact: The debt is up a staggering 70 percent since Obama took office.

This is the "secret sauce" that has produced Obama’s "success." It adds up to the world’s largest Ponzi scheme. We’ve printed trillions in fake dollars to make the stock market go up for the corporate elite (Obama’s biggest donors), to prop up union pension funds (to benefit Obama’s biggest union supporters), and to pay for 107 million Americans on welfare and food stamps (Obama’s most loyal voters). But the mountain of debt is like a credit card credit line that will soon explode, destroying our country and our children’s future. Every politician who supported it should be in jail.

Anyone can use credit cards and mortgages they can’t afford to look like they’re rich. But when the bill comes due, the whole scheme comes crashing down. America under Obama is one big fraud. The "prosperity" is a mirage, propped up by debt. We are living on borrowed credit.

Debt is a cancer that kills every country it has ever touched. Study ancient Greece or the Roman Empire. Or ask Venezuela. They are following the exact Obama game plan. They now have massive unrest, starving citizens, food and toilet paper shortages, and the highest stock market in history!

Obama has corrupted and destroyed the system. It’s rigged to make the stock market go up, while hiding the fact that he’s piling up the most debt in world history, mortgaging our future, destroying the middle class and driving most of the workforce into poverty and government dependency.

Then there’s the lie that Obama has reduced the deficit. Well, this fantastic "reduced" deficit is still higher than the highest deficit under Bush. But let’s give credit where credit is due. The deficit is down due to you and me: the taxpayers. Obama pushed through the highest tax increases in history. We’re all paying much higher taxes. That’s why the deficit is down. How is that an achievement?

Middle-class America has been fleeced so Obama can brag he’s reduced the deficit. Is the GOP really this stupid? They can’t figure this out? Higher taxes have produced the highest inflow of government revenue in history, which has reduced the deficit.

That’s not an achievement; it’s a rip-off.

Finally, let’s throw in one more massive lie. Government claims inflation is low. Really? Electric rates are at an all-time high. Health insurance premiums are at an all-time high. College costs are at an all-time high. And food you buy to feed your family is at an all-time high — from beef to chicken to eggs to veggies. It’s all up dramatically under Obama.

But our corrupt government removed all of those middle-class staples of life from their inflation index. It’s pure fraud. While they claim no inflation, we all have no jobs, no wage increases for anyone lucky enough to still have a job and massive inflation on all the products that matter.

The entire Obama economic "recovery" is a lie. It’s all based on lies, misrepresentations, pure fraud in some cases, higher taxes, massive debt and on the income redistribution of money from the middle class to the poor and the corporate elite. The rest of us are either drowning or hanging on for dear life.

Hey, Bill Maher, are you reading this? I’ve got an important message for you and your show: Stop lying! By the way, I’m available anytime to debate your lies, fantasy and propaganda. "Call me. Let’s do lunch, babe."

I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. God bless America.





Obama Is Guilty Yet Again: This Is The Root Of America's Economic Death Spiral…And You'll Never Hear About It On The News
“Let’s get one thing clear: The economy is never truly coming back…” Unless, says Jim Clifton, we reverse the life cycle trends of American business. The company’s recent research shows entrepreneurship is declining for the first time since the government began measuring it over 35 years ago. The U.S. has fallen to 12th worldwide in terms of business startup activities. Former communist bastions like Hungary and Finland now have higher startup rates than the U.S. And of the 6 million operational U.S. businesses, only 3.8 million are the classic “mom and pop” (employing between one and four people). These businesses used to blanket the states from coast to coast. They provided the foundation of a wide tax base and jobs for 100 million people.They’re the root of U.S. power and prosperity... and right now they are in terminal decline.


Obama Is Guilty Yet Again: This Is The Root Of America's Economic Death Spiral…And You'll Never Hear About It On The News

This Is The Root Of America's Economic Death Spiral... And You'll Never Hear About It On The News

Palm Beach Daily — January 21, 2015

"Let’s get one thing clear: The economy is never truly coming back…"

Unless, says Jim Clifton, CEO of Gallup, we reverse the life cycle trends of American business. The company’s recent research shows entrepreneurship is declining for the first time since the government began measuring it over 35 years ago.

Since 2008, about 400,000 new businesses are born every year... but 470,000 businesses die. The U.S. has fallen to 12th worldwide in terms of business startup activities. Former communist bastions like Hungary and Finland now have higher startup rates than the U.S.

The report says, of the 26 million reported "businesses" in the U.S., 20 million of these have no sales, profits, customers, or employees. And of the 6 million operational businesses, only 3.8 million are the classic "mom and pop" (employing between one and four people). These businesses used to blanket the states from coast to coast. They provided the foundation of a wide tax base and jobs for 100 million people.

They’re the root of U.S. power and prosperity... and right now they are in terminal decline.

Don’t expect to hear about the death of entrepreneurship in the news. Both Washington and Wall Street need you to believe the economy is coming back. They’ll focus on indicators like a booming stock market to show America’s business environment has improved. This keeps the current power structure entrenched.

But until the U.S. business life cycle returns positive, America’s economic foundation will remain endangered... and with it, American prosperity.





The Great Media Conspiracy About Race: Why Do The Media Lie And Commit Fraud To Cover-Up For “Racist Barack Obama” And Black Criminals?
Why do the media lie about race and commit fraud to cover-up for Obama, while he raves on about the rare cases of a handful of black Americans being shot by white people, but: Never mention the hourly murder of blacks by blacks with 93% of all black murders being committed by blacks? Never mention that 53% of all white murders are committed by blacks? Never mention 77% of all crimes in America are committed by blacks? Never mention black-on-police crime? Never mention the genocide of the black race perpetrated by black criminals in inner cities? Never mention a young white man being murdered by a gang of blacks days after the Ferguson verdict who yelled out — “Kill the white people”. Apparently, none of this violence, murder & racism matters to the nation’s first black president — as long as the people committing it on a massive scale are black.


The Great Media Conspiracy About Race: Why Do The Media Lie And Commit Fraud To Cover-Up For “Racist Barack Obama” And Black Criminals?

The Great Media Conspiracy About Race

January 8, 2015 by Wayne Allyn Root — Personal Liberty

Watch the video here — http://personalliberty.com/great-media-conspiracy-race/ — or read the text of it below:

Hi. I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. Why do the media lie about race? Why do they commit fraud to cover-up for Barack Obama? It’s started out as embarrassing and pathetic. But it’s moved on to pure fraud and widespread conspiracy.

Why do the media allow Obama to give press conferences about the handful of black Americans killed by police officers, but never mention the police officers murdered by black criminals? It happens all the time, but Obama never says a word about it.

That’s his prerogative. But it’s the media’s job to question him, to point out the inconsistencies, to call him on the hypocrisy and what looks to both police officers and law-abiding citizens as a dangerous double standard that incites violence against police.

Why do the media allow Obama to call Tea Party activists bad people, violent or radicals when there is not one instance in history of violence or anyone recommending violence at any Tea Party rally. Yet the same media has video proof of protesters at the anti- police rallies Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder encourage, screaming in unison: "What do we want? Dead cops." It’s all on video.

Then when police officers are murdered, the media never assign any blame to the president.

Why do the media allow Obama to give press conferences about the handful of black Americans shot by white people (like George Zimmerman or police officer Darren Wilson), despite these cases being rare, but:

Never mention the hourly murder of blacks by blacks, including the fact that 93 percent of all black murders are committed by blacks?

Never mention black-on-black storeowner crime (like looting and burning in Ferguson, Missouri)?

Never mention black-on-police crime?

Never mention the genocide of the black race perpetrated by black criminals in inner cities like Detroit, Chicago, Baltimore or Memphis, Tennessee?

Where are the nationwide protests for the thousands of innocent black lives taken by black criminals? Is there no money or media headlines or political gain in those kind of protests?

Why don’t the media ask the president if black-on-black crime matters to him? If so, why has he never chosen to speak out about it? Why don’t they ask Obama to name one victim of black-on-black crime in Chicago this past weekend? Can he name anyone in the past year? Why are their deaths unimportant, insignificant and anonymous?

Why not ask Obama and Holder why there aren’t teams of Justice Department investigators and prosecutors assigned to black-on-black murders in Chicago (Obama’s hometown)? Why isn’t the same amount of "boots on the ground" assigned to overwhelm black-on-black crime scenes as aimed toward a white police officer like Wilson in Ferguson?

Shouldn’t the media question why the federal government calls it a "hate crime" if a white person kills a black man (even if it was in self-defense and the black man had a criminal record), but there are black-on-white murders every day. One happened to a white Bosnian immigrant driving through a black neighborhood in St. Louis only days after the Ferguson verdict.

His fiancée watched him being murdered by a gang of black criminals who had allegedly yelled out, "Kill the white people."

Yet there is no "hate crime" designation for that murder, no civil rights investigation, no federal intervention, no national media headlines, no coast to coast protests and no press conferences by the president or Al Sharpton. Where are the media? Silent.

What about Sharpton? Shouldn’t the media be pointing out that a known racist rabble- rouser who was allegedly involved in drug dealing, who was filmed negotiating cocaine deals, who was a federal informant doing business with the mob, who tried to destroy the lives of police and prosecutors back in the ’80s based on false rape allegations (see Tawana Brawley) and who owes more than $4 million dollars in back taxes (as reported by The New York Times) is one of Obama’s BFFs (best friends forever) and has visited the White House 81 times to give the president of the United States advice on racism and race relations.

Are you kidding me? "Saturday Night Live" couldn’t make this story up.

Where are the media questioning the role of a "race pimp" and con man (Sharpton) hanging out in the White House with the president? What’s the difference between Sharpton and David Duke? Both are racists and haters. Both have made money trying to cause racial division and stir up violence. The only differences I can think of are that Duke was never involved with the mob, has no background in drug dealing and doesn’t owe the IRS more than $4 million. Shouldn’t the media be asking Obama why he

isn’t embarrassed and ashamed to have a man like Sharpton step foot in the people’s house?

Shouldn’t the media be asking what’s the difference between white Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy and Sharpton? Bundy owed a disputed $1 million in back fees to the government, so the government raided his ranch with militarized SWAT teams, airplanes, helicopters and assault weapons. But Sharpton owes more than $4 million to the same government; and there’s no raid, no threats or intimidation by government and no police surrounding his New York City headquarters.

Remarkably, that same guy (Sharpton) gets to pal around with the president of the United States. That same guy gets to give advice on race relations to the president. That same guy gets a national TV show on MSNBC. That same guy makes a living extorting corporations in the name of "racism."

If they pay his organization a "consulting fee," he either says nice things about them or shuts up. But if they don’t pay, he organizes national protests against them. Isn’t that called a "mob shakedown?" Don’t white men with Italian surnames go to prison for decades for the same thing? But a black man involved in the same mob shakedowns gets the red carpet rolled out at the White House? Heck, the president speaks at Sharpton’s events and the media say nothing.

Shouldn’t the media be asking these obvious questions:

Don’t police lives matter?
Don’t white lives matter?
Don’t black kids slaughtered by black criminals matter? Don’t mob shakedowns matter?
Doesn’t tax fraud on a massive scale matter?

Apparently, none of it matters to the nation’s first black president — as long as the people committing all this violence, murder, fraud, shakedowns, racism and tax evasion on a massive scale are black. And the media say nothing.

Folks, it’s official: We are now living in a banana republic.

I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. God bless America and protect us from this group of shysters in the media and in the White House.





Who Is Celebrating Obama In The New Year? Is it just a mere coincidence that it’s the enemies of America & its legal citizens, the enemies of the American Dream, the enemies of Judeo-Christian values, the enemies of freedom & capitalism, and the enemies of cops who are doing most of the Obama celebrating?
Obama celebrators: Millions of illegal immigrants as Obama destroys the rights & welfare of all legal citizens. Government bureaucrats handing out welfare checks. Basement renovators for unemployed adults dwelling in their parents’ basements. Pharmaceutical companies as a record 30 million Americans are dependent on antidepressants. Cop haters as Obama praises them & encourages them to hate, loot & burn. Radical Muslim terrorists as a disguised radical Muslim - Obama - rules America. Fidel & Raul Castro as Obama saves Cuba from economic collapse and the certain death of communism. Vladimir Putin as Obama puts Russia in the driver’s seat and America in the back seat.


Who Is Celebrating Obama In The New Year? Is it just a mere coincidence that it’s the enemies of America & its legal citizens, the enemies of the American Dream, the enemies of Judeo-Christian values, the enemies of freedom & capitalism, and the enemies of cops who are doing most of the Obama celebrating?

Happy New Year! Let’s Celebrate Obama!

January 1, 2015 by Wayne Allyn Root — Personal Liberty

Watch the video here: http://personalliberty.com/happy-new-year-lets-celebrate-obama/ — or read the text of it below:

Hi I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. Many of you know that I am Barack Obama’s college classmate from Columbia University, Class of ’83. Back in 1981 when my Columbia classmates heard my hero President Ronald Reagan had been shot, they erupted in joy. They celebrated by jumping up and down, cheering, hugging and giving each other high-fives. They screamed, "Yes! Reagan is dead. They got the bastard!" I witnessed it all, firsthand. My radical leftist classmates thought a conservative legend was dead, and that was cause for celebration. I remember thinking, "They are celebrating like it’s New Year’s Eve." After all that’s what you do on New Year’s: celebrate!

That memory inspired me to write a column celebrating Obama as we approach New Year’s 2015. Let’s not rehash the bad stuff, the disastrous stuff, the tragic stuff, the decline and perhaps even death of America at the hands of a radical Big Brother tyrant. That’s not the way to celebrate New Year’s. Let’s look at the bright side. You know: The glass is half full.

You might ask: "What is the positive side of the Obama presidency?" Well, there are a few groups that should celebrate.

For my fellow constitutional and 2nd Amendment patriots, Obama is the greatest gun salesman in history. Over 70 million guns have been purchased since Obama took office. This man opens his mouth, reads from the teleprompter and, instantly, Americans are inspired to buy all-time record quantities of guns and ammo. If you’re a fan of the 2nd Amendment (or a gun dealer), Obama has been the answer to your prayers.

For my fellow fiscal conservatives and capitalists, Obama is the greatest gold salesman ever. Conservatives love gold. Gold, after all, is the antidote to a debt crisis and lack of confidence in a reckless or incompetent government. That’s why record sums of gold were bought during the past six years. Central bankers worldwide bought more gold in one recent year than in half a century (since 1964).

Fiscal conservatives (and gun dealers) rejoice. Obama is a walking billboard for God, guns and gold!

Obama is also the greatest thing to ever happen to print shop owners. While the rest of us are struggling to keep our heads above water, print shop owners can’t keep up with the demand for "Going Out of Business" and "Home For Sale by Bank" signs. And what about all the protest signs funded by communist groups announcing "What Do We Want? DEAD COPS." Print shop owners, rejoice! You’ve never had it so good.

And then there are "English as a Second Language" teachers. There may be very few good jobs left in Obama’s America, but if you speak both English and Spanish, the sky is the limit. With the border wide open and Obama announcing amnesty for illegals, celebrate if you are a teacher of "English as a Second Language." You have the most in- demand job in America. Unfortunately, demand for prison guards may soon surpass you.

Obama is the greatest thing to ever happen to government bureaucrats. The future is bright if your goal is to sit in a windowless office handing out checks for welfare, food stamps, disability and unemployment, while complaining you are overworked and underpaid. With almost 20 percent of all Americans on food stamps alone, there’s enough work for you to last a lifetime... or at least 20 years, until you retire at age 45 and collect an obscene pension for the next 40 to 50 years for not working.

And what about the boom in basements? With Obama and his socialist cabal in control for another two years, basements are the new hip living space for young adults. At this moment, 31 percent of all Americans between the ages of 18 and 34 live with their parents.

Obama’s high taxes and massive regulations guarantee millions of college graduates will either stay unemployed or underemployed in low-wage jobs, forcing them to live in mommy’s and daddy’s basement for years to come. Basements are no longer lonely dusty places to store old furniture. In the age of Obama, they are where you store your 30-year-old unemployed children.

Pharmaceutical companies are celebrating. A record 30 million Americans are dependent on antidepressants.

There would be many more, except millions of depressed Americans self-medicate with alcohol. If you sell drugs or booze, give a shout-out this New Year’s to Obama, the greatest salesman for your products ever!

And then, of course, there are the cop haters who are celebrating. To think you used to be misunderstood, hated pariahs. Today you are in favor — with Obama praising you for hating cops. He encourages you to protest, loot, burn and act like exactly what you are: idiots who have no interest in getting a job. But, no worry, this New Year’s you can come out of the closet, celebrate and be openly you!

Unfortunately, the rest of us are hiding in the closet, because you’re on the streets.

If you’re a radical Muslim terrorist, or just someone who sympathizes with radical Muslims (i.e., a Democrat) — celebrate! Obama is the best thing to ever happened to you. Under Obama America has become a politically correct shell of its former self. Rest easy. No more "enhanced interrogations." And if you’re caught, you’ll live like a king at Guantanamo, provided with a Koran, prayer rug, religiously approved food, basketball courts and expensive lawyers. Then once you are rested up, you’ll be released back to the battlefield, ready to again cut off heads and slaughter women and little children. Obama is the best thing that ever happened to you.

If you’re Fidel and Raul Castro, celebrate Obama. By opening relations and trade, Obama saved Cuba from economic collapse and the certain death of communism. He asked for nothing in return. You get to remain a communist nation, jail your political opposition, steal the people’s income, while enjoying the prosperity that comes from doing business with America’s biggest companies. Celebrate Obama — the savior of communism — on New Year’s Day!

Finally, we come to Vladimir Putin. He’s celebrating "like it’s 1999" this New Year’s. God handed him "the gift of a lifetime" in the form of Barack Obama. Obama pulled off a miracle for Putin and the Russian people. He made a bankrupt, decaying country look like a world power again. He gave a demoralized military swagger again. Obama managed to do something even Putin couldn’t do — put Mother Russia in the driver’s seat and America in the back seat.

The only question is: Is this a coincidence, or was this Obama’s plan all along?

Yes, there’s certainly a lot to celebrate this New Year’s. Unfortunately, it’s the enemies of America, American exceptionalism, the American dream, Judeo-Christian values, capitalism and cops who are doing most of the celebrating.

For the rest of us, it’s two long years until we can celebrate "Obama-free America."

I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. Thank you for all your support in this past year. I greatly appreciate your reading my column. I read each and every comment under each column. I love to hear what you think. Happy New Year and enjoy your food, celebration and football today! God bless America in 2015. See you next week.





Our Holiday Wishes For Obama: May He Reap In Abundance What He Has Abundantly Sown Upon Us
Here are some perfect holiday gifts for Obama & his family: Michelle works in a part-time, low-wage job with no benefits. Obama’s Secret Service is disarmed. The fence around the White House is removed for open occupancy by illegal immigrants. Christmas dinner at the White House is prepared & served by illegal immigrants from the Ebola zone. Obama’s health insurance is canceled. Criminal background checks are ended for any black employee hired at the White House. Obama’s two children are enrolled at an inner-city public school. Obama’s limousine is replaced with a Prius. The Obama family spends a week underground in an Israeli bomb shelter. When attacked by terrorists, Obama calls for help and finds everyone asleep with orders that they not be disturbed for the night. And, Obama is impeached in the new year and relegated to being a policeman on street patrol duty in a violent crime zone.


Our Holiday Wishes For Obama: May He Reap In Abundance What He Has Abundantly Sown Upon Us

My Holiday Wishes For Obama

December 25, 2014 by Wayne Allyn Root

Watch the video here: http://personalliberty.com/holiday-wishes-obama/ — or read the text of it below:

Hello. I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. Merry Christmas to all my friends, fans and loyal readers at Personal Liberty. This is a day for reflecting on this great country and thanking God for all of our blessings.

Now, many of you probably think I don’t like President Obama. That’s not true. I’ve actually been thinking of what gifts to give to my old Columbia college classmate for Christmas. I’ve come up with 15 holiday gift ideas for Obama and his family. Every one of them fits him like a glove.

Here are the 15 perfect holiday gifts for Obama:

No. 1: To remind Obama of the economy he created, may Michelle work in a part-time, low-wage job with no benefits. It might do her some good to experience the real Obama economy.

No. 2: I’d like to see Obama’s Secret Service disarmed, since he doesn’t think rest of us need guns for protection. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander!

No. 3: I’d like to remove the fence around the White House. Since Obama doesn’t think we need any fence at our Southern border with Mexico, why should he need a fence around the White House? Either fences or walls work, or they don’t. If we don’t need one at the border (and Obama says there’s no border problem), then obviously a fence isn’t needed at the border to the White House either. Let’s all live with "the honor system."

No. 4: A Christmas dinner at the White House prepared and served by illegal immigrants who just arrived from the Ebola zone, since he thinks the rest of us shouldn’t worry about Ebola (or illegal immigration). Good luck and bon appetit. Oh, by the way, you probably think the Ebola threat is gone. That’s because the media has agreed to partner with the Obama administration to cover up the truth. It was revealed just days ago that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is monitoring more than 1,300 potential Ebola cases inside America right now. Did you know that? I didn’t think so.

No. 5: Of course, that White House Christmas dinner should be prepared with careful adherence to the standards of Michelle’s "nutritious" public school lunch program. I hope Obama enjoys one stick of celery and one cracker. That should be yummy!

No. 6: Just like Obama, I believe in "fairness" and "equality." What could be fairer than seeing Obama’s health insurance canceled like the rest of us. He promised: "If you like your insurance, you can keep it." I just lost mine. So have millions of others. It’s time for Obama to enjoy some of his own medicine. Besides, Michelle’s policy doesn’t provide coverage for pregnancy, Viagra or mental health issues. That’s not "fair." So it’s gotta go!

No. 7: The end of all criminal background checks for any black employee hired at White House. Why not let Obama enjoy the same policy that his Equal Employment Opportunity Commission tried to enforce on every business in America? You didn’t know that, did you? Obama’s EEOC actually tried to ban background checks just for black potential employees. The courts struck it down.

No. 8: May Sasha and Malia enjoy their 2015 school year at a fine inner-city public school. After all, Obama believes those teachers unions really "care about the kids." Let’s try out his theory in the real world on his own kids.

No. 9: Since Obama is such a believer in climate change, may he spend the last two years of his presidency riding around in a Prius, instead of his heavy, gas-guzzling bullet-proof limousine. And of course, Air Force One has to go, too. From now on, Obama flies coach — on American (the perfect airline for a guy who wants to fundamentally change America).

No. 10: If Obama comes under withering fire from terrorists, may he call his favorite general and find him asleep with orders that he not be disturbed for the night. A little taste of the last moments of our heroes at Benghazi might be the ideal Christmas gift for Obama!

No. 11: Since Obama doesn’t want any of us to have coal anymore, I hope he gets coal in his Christmas stocking hanging above White House fireplace. May it always remind him of the plentiful cheap energy he took away from middle-class Americans in order to bankrupt and punish us for — and these were his words back in 2008 — "clinging to [our] guns and Bibles."

No. 12: Also in that Christmas stocking I’d like to give Obama two books he ought to read: the book that best describes what Obama has done to America, my national bestseller, "The Murder of the Middle Class," and then there’s the biography about Obama’s life called "The Audacity of a Dope."

No. 13: Don’t forget an intrusive IRS audit under the tree, ordered by Valerie Jarrett. I hope this IRS audit extends to Jonathan Gruber, the architect of Obamacare who accepted over $1.4 million dollars to design a healthcare program to deceive the "stupid voters," and Jack Lew, the U.S. Treasury secretary who keeps his money in the Cayman Islands. And of course, the IRS audit should extend to Michelle Obama’s Princeton Black Alumni classmate whose company received hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars to design the Obamacare website (that did not work).

No. 14: I give the Obama family a week underground in an Israeli bomb shelter, fearing for their lives alongside the citizens of Israel whose lives Obama has placed in peril again and again with his support and sympathy for radical terrorists, Palestinian terrorists, Iran’s nuclear bomb and, of course, the wonderful "Arab Spring" — not to mention his incompetence towards ISIS. Yes, you’ve made the world a much safer place, Mr. Obama, for all of the enemies of America, freedom, capitalism, Christianity and Israel. Is that a coincidence?

And finally my last Christmas wish for Obama: Impeachment in the new year, fraud convictions and prison time for every Obama aide involved in the Obamacare deception and the IRS scandal, and a partridge in a pear tree.

Wow! Wouldn’t that list make for a happy new year?

I haven’t even gotten to Obama’s anti-police propaganda, inciting the cold-blooded assassination of two New York City policemen only days ago, or Marxist Obama doing a big favor for his communist comrades Fidel and Raul Castro by saving Cuba from imminent economic collapse. I’ll save all that for next year.

Merry Christmas and happy holidays, everyone. I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty.

God bless America .





The Illegal Immigration Story Obama Doesn’t Want You To Hear: Illegal immigration is literally bankrupting our school system, medical system and legal system while burying the American economy
Obama won’t tell you what illegal immigration has done to California: the massive increase in the cost of police, courts & prisons, the destruction of public schools or the massive welfare debt turning California into a bankrupt hellhole like Greece or Detroit, and taxes that are now among the highest in the nation. He won’t tell you that 70% of the public school students in Las Vegas take English as a second language and receive free meals at school. The costs of illegal immigration are taking away the resources to teach the children of legal American citizens reading, writing & math. School budgets are drowning under the weight. Illegal immigration is literally bankrupting our school system, medical system & legal system. The taxes necessary to pay for all this is burying the American economy.


The Illegal Immigration Story Obama Doesn’t Want You To Hear: Illegal immigration is literally bankrupting our school system, medical system and legal system while burying the American economy

The Illegal Immigration Story Obama Doesn’t Want You To Hear

12/18/2014 by Wayne Allyn Root — Personal Liberty

Watch the video here — http://personalliberty.com/illegal-immigration-story-obama-doesnt-want-hear/ — or read the text of it below:

Hello. I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. And I’ve got good news! A federal judge has just ruled that Barack Obama’s executive action on amnesty for illegal immigrants violates the separation of powers and is, therefore, unconstitutional. Glory hallelujah! We’ve finally found one judge in all of America who actually recognizes the law and is brave enough to enforce it.

But in our country and our republic it’s not just the legal court that matters; it’s the court of public opinion that finally determines winners and losers. Unfortunately, the court of public opinion is Obama’s "home court" because he is a master salesman who understands that "facts tell, but stories sell." Emotional personal stories are always necessary to close the sale. If you want to sell anything from a used car to stocks to a dishwasher to public policy, there is no better way than telling a great, emotional and compelling personal story, preferably a tear-jerker.

Forget the facts. Obama never uses facts to sell his policies because liberals never have facts on their side. He uses stories — great stories. Take illegal immigration. No country in history has survived with open borders. A welfare state (like today’s America under Obama) that allows in millions of poor, desperate, uneducated illegal immigrants with open hands and open mouths, looking for cradle-to-grave welfare, can never survive. Obama won’t tell you what illegal immigration has done to California’s budget: the massive increase in the cost of police, courts and prisons. He won’t mention the destruction of public schools or the massive welfare debt turning California into a bankrupt hellhole like Greece — or Detroit. He won’t mention that California’s taxes are now among the highest in the nation because of the costs of illegal immigration.

Or look at my hometown of Las Vegas. Obama announced his amnesty plan here. But he won’t tell you that 70 percent of the public school students in Las Vegas take English as a second language, while about 70 percent of the students receive free breakfasts and lunches at school. That’s not a coincidence. The costs of illegal immigration are taking away the resources to teach the children of legal American citizens reading, writing and math. School budgets are drowning under the weight. Illegal immigration is literally bankrupting our school system, medical system and legal system. The taxes necessary to pay for all this is burying the once-dynamic American economy.

Since Obama can’t sell his illegal amnesty policy with facts, he has to tell stories. So he tells the story of a young illegal immigrant gal in Las Vegas studying for her master’s degree. "Do we want to deport her?" he asks. "Is that the kind of country we are?"

Obama is trying to say that this young Vegas gal represents "the American dream" and she is representative of all illegal aliens. Brilliant! He’s playing on our heartstrings — no facts, just emotional personal stories.

Well, two can play at that game. I’ve got a compelling personal story from Las Vegas for the GOP to use. Thanks to my friend Chuck Muth for passing on this story. Muth is one of the great conservative activists in this country. He’s also one of the few conservative leaders who understands how to sell conservatism — with personal and emotional stories. This one is a powder keg. This story not an American dream; it’s an American nightmare. Tell this story from coast to coast, and Obama’s plans for illegal immigration amnesty are DOA (dead on arrival).

In Las Vegas, days before this past Thanksgiving, a Las Vegas grandfather named Michael Grubbs was walking his granddaughter in a stroller alongside the road was struck and killed by a reckless, possibly drunk, driver. Worse, that driver never bothered to check if the grandfather or the baby was alive. The driver gunned the gas and sped off, leaving a good man to die in the street. That’s called "hit and run" — one of the most heinous crimes in our society.

Days later, Galina Kilova decided to turn herself in (through a lawyer). Did she wait days because she was "under the influence" and wanted all drugs or alcohol to clear her system? We’ll never know.

What we do know is this terrible person, this alleged hit-and-run driver is an illegal alien. The Las Vegas Sun reported: "Records show Kilova entered the country in 2006 on a nonimmigrant visa, which permitted her to stay in the country for six months..."

We know she was arrested before, back in 2007, on charges of — can you guess? — "driving without a valid license, failure to use due care and driving under the influence of alcohol."

Was she deported then? Of course not. Why? Because of bleeding-heart radical community activists like Obama. Or perhaps she was working on her master’s degree.

If the law had been followed and this illegal alien deported then, Grubbs would still be alive and would have celebrated Thanksgiving with the family he loved. One-year-old Brooke would grow up with a beloved grandpa. But now that will never happen. Brooke will never even remember her grandfather. Grandpa Michael will never see or hear or touch his family again.

Worse than even that, after turning herself in on a felony hit-and-run charge, this illegal alien was soon released from jail. Again. The system doesn’t work. Why? Because of liberals, lawyers and radical community activists like Obama.

Finally, on Dec. 9, a week after being released on bond, the Bulgarian-born Kilova was taken into U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody.

This is the story that needs to be told by the GOP day and night. Make 1-year-old Brooke and her dead grandpa, Grubbs, the faces of the anti-amnesty story. Stories sell. And this story is a nuclear weapon that blows Obama’s dreams to smithereens. Shout this story from the mountaintops. Put the faces of Grubbs and Brooke on TV commercials 24 hours a day. Like Willie Horton, the murderer paroled by Michael Dukakis who obliterated Dukakis’ 1988 presidential campaign, this emotional story will obliterate Obama’s illegal amnesty.

GOP, are you listening? Facts tell, but stories sell. This story trumps any story Obama tells. This story kills amnesty forever. This story seals the border. Or this story ignites a revolution by law-abiding, taxpaying, legal American citizens. We need an emotional story that incites "we the people" to wake up and take charge — before our country is gone forever.

This Christmas season remember Grubbs and his little angel, Brooke. Then call your congressman and senators. Let’s stop amnesty dead in its tracks by taking a page from Obama’s playbook. Facts tell, but stories sell. Like Obama, conservatives need a plan to overwhelm the system. Instead of Cloward-Piven, I’ll call this plan "The Michael Grubbs and Brooke Trinidad Memorial Plan to Secure Our Borders."

I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. God bless America.





IMF Now Ready To Slam The Door On The U.S. And The Dollar: The American Public Will Suffer Greatly
The year 2014 is the new 2007, with all the negative potential but 100 times more explosive going into 2015. Our nation has wallowed in slowly degrading financial conditions for years, hidden by fake economic statistics & manipulated stock prices. All of it has been a prelude to a much more frenetic & shocking event. I believe that we will see continued market chaos from now on; I expect a hailstorm of geopolitical crises over the next year to provide cover for the shift away from the dollar. The death of the dollar will be hailed as a good and necessary thing. But the American public will suffer greatly as the dollar crumbles. It all is a charade designed to hide the complete centralization of sovereign economic governance into the hands of the globalists, using the IMF and BIS as fiscal heroes, saving the world from a state of economic destruction the elites themselves secretly created.


IMF Now Ready To Slam The Door On The U.S. And The Dollar: The American Public Will Suffer Greatly

IMF Now Ready To Slam The Door On The U.S. And The Dollar

12-16-2014 by Brandon SmithPersonal Liberty

As I write this, the news is saturated with stories of a hostage situation possibly involving Islamic militants in Sydney, Australia. Like many, I am concerned about the shockwave such an event will create through our sociopolitical structures. However, while most of the world will be distracted by the outcome of this crisis (for good or bad) for at least the next two weeks, I find I must concern myself with a far more important and dangerous situation.

Up to 40 people may be held by supposed extremists in Sydney, but the entire world is currently being held hostage economically by international banks. This is the crisis no one in the mainstream is talking about, so alternative analysts must.

As I predicted last month in "We have just witnessed the last gasp of the global economy," severe volatility is now returning to global markets after the pre-game 10 percent drop in equities in October hinted at what was to come.

We expected such destabilization after the wrap-up of the Fed taper, and the markets have not disappointed so far. My position has always been that the taper of QE3 made very little sense in terms of maintaining the illusion of economic health — unless, of course, the Federal Reserve was implementing the taper in preparation for a renewed financial catastrophe. That is to say, the central bankers have established the lie of American fiscal recovery and then separated themselves from blame for the implosion they know is coming. If the markets were to collapse while stimulus is officially active, the tragedy would be forever a millstone on the necks of the banksters. And we can’t have that now, can we?

This is not to say that individual central banks and even currencies are not expendable in the grand scheme of things. In fact, the long-term goal of globalists has been to consolidate all currency systems and central banks under the outward control of the International Monetary Fund and the Bank Of International Settlements, as I outlined in "The economic endgame explained."

That particular article was only a summary of a dangerous trend I have been warning about for years, namely the strategy by international financiers to create a dollar- collapse scenario that will be blamed on prepositioned scapegoats. I have no idea what form these scapegoats will take: There are simply too many possible triggers for fiscal calamity. What I do know, though, is the goal of the endgame: to remove the dollar’s world reserve status and to pressure the American people into conforming or even begging for centralized administration of our economy by the IMF.

The delusion perpetuated in the mainstream is that the IMF is a U.S.-dominated institution. I have outlined on many occasions why this is false. The IMF like all central banks is dominated by the international corporate banking cartel. Central banks are merely front organizations for globalists, and I am often reminded of the following quote from elitist insider Carroll Quigley when I hear people suggest that central banks are somehow independent from one another or that the Federal Reserve is itself the singular "source" of the world’s economic ills:

It must not be felt that these heads of the world’s chief central banks were themselves substantive powers in world finance. They were not. Rather, they were the technicians and agents of the dominant investment bankers of their own countries, who had raised them up and were perfectly capable of throwing them down.

The substantive financial powers of the world were in the hands of these investment bankers (also called "international" or "merchant" bankers) who remained largely behind the scenes in their own unincorporated private banks. These formed a system of international cooperation and national dominance which was more private, more powerful and more secret than that of their agents in the central banks.

No one can now argue against this reality after we have witnessed hard evidence of Goldman Sachs dictating Federal Reserve policy, as outlined here.

And, most recently, we now know that international bankers control political legislation as well, as Congress passed with little resistance a bill that negates the Frank-Dodd restrictions on derivatives and places the U.S. taxpayers and account holders on the hook for more than $303 trillion in toxic debt instruments. The bill is, for all intents and purposes, a "bail-in" measure in disguise. And it was pushed through with the direct influence of JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon.

The Federal Reserve, the U.S. government and the dollar are as expendable to the elites as any other economic or political appendage. And it can be replaced at will with yet another illusory structure if this furthers their goal of total centralization. This has been done for centuries, and I fail to see why anyone would assume that globalists would change their tactics now to preserve the dollar system. They call it the "New World Order," but it is really the same old-world monetary order out of chaos that has always been exploited. Enter the IMF’s old/new world vision.

In articles over the past year, I have warned that the plan to dethrone the dollar and replace it with the special drawing rights basket currency system would be accelerated after it became clear that the U.S. Congress would refuse to pass the IMF reforms of 2010 proclaiming "inclusiveness" for developing economies, including the BRICS nations. The latest spending bill removed any mention of IMF reforms. The IMF, under Christine Lagarde, has insisted that if the U.S. did not approve its part of the reforms, the IMF would be forced to pursue a "Plan B" scenario. The details on this "plan B" have not been forthcoming, until now.

The Financial Times reported on the IMF shift away from the U.S. by asserting the authority to remove the veto power America has always enjoyed over the institution. This action is a stark reminder to mainstream talking heads and to those who believe the U.S. is the core economic danger to the world that the IMF is not an extension of American policy. If anything, the IMF and the U.S. are extensions of international banking policy, just as the BRICS are nothing more than puppets for the same self- serving financial oligarchy clamoring for the same IMF-controlled paradigm, as Vladimir Putin openly admitted:

In the BRICS case we see a whole set of coinciding strategic interests. First of all, this is the common intention to reform the international monetary and financial system. In the present form it is unjust to the BRICS countries and to new economies in general. We should take a more active part in the IMF and the World Bank’s decision-making system. The international monetary system itself depends a lot on the US dollar, or, to be precise, on the monetary and financial policy of the US authorities. The BRICS countries want to change this...

The IMF decision to eliminate U.S. veto power and, thus, influence over IMF decisions may come as early as the first quarter of next year. This is the great "economic reset" that Largarde has been promoting ad nauseam in multiple interviews and speeches over the past six months. All of these measures are culminating in what I believe will be a more official announcement of a dump of the U.S. dollar as world reserve currency.

Along with the imminent loss of veto power, I have also written on the concerns of the coming SDR conference in 2015. This conference is held only once every five years. My suspicion has been that the IMF plans to announce the inclusion of the Chinese yuan in the SDR basket and that this will coincide with a steady dollar dump around the globe. Multiple major economies have already dropped the dollar in bilateral trade with China, and engineered tensions between the U.S. and the East have exacerbated the issue.

The timing of the SDR conference has now been announced, and the meeting looks to be set for October of 2015. Interestingly, this linked article notes that China has a "real shot" at SDR inclusion and official "reserve status" next year, but warns that the U.S. "may use its veto power" to stop China’s membership. I have to laugh at the absurdity of it all, because there are many people in the world of economic study who still believe the developments of globalization and fiscal distress are all "random." I suppose that if it is all random, then it is a rather convenient coincidence that the U.S. just happens to be on the verge of losing veto power in the IMF just before they are about to bring the BRICS into the SDR fold and supplant the dollar.

This is it, folks; this is the endgame right in front of our faces. The year of 2014 is the new 2007, with all the negative potential but 100 times more explosive going into 2015. Our nation has wallowed in slowly degrading financial conditions for years, hidden by fake economic statistics and manipulated stock prices. All of it has been a prelude to a much more frenetic and shocking event. I believe that we will see continued market chaos from now on, with a steep declining trend intermixed with brief but inadequate "dead cat" stock bounces. I expect a hailstorm of geopolitical crises over the next year to provide cover for the shift away from the dollar.

Ultimately, the death of the dollar will be hailed in the mainstream as a "good and necessary thing." They will call it "karma." They will call it "progress." They will even call it "decentralization" and a success for the free market. But it will not feel like a positive development for the American public, who will suffer greatly as the dollar crumbles. Only those educated in the underpinnings of shadow banking will understand the whole thing is a charade designed to hide the complete centralization of sovereign economic governance into the hands of the globalists, using the IMF and BIS as "fiscal heroes," saving the world from a state of economic destruction the elites themselves secretly created.

–Brandon Smith





Obama Says Police Officers Should Wear Body Cameras: So, Why Shouldn’t The Unrivaled Example Of Lies, Fraud And Taxpayer Abuse — Obama Himself — Wear One Too?
History proves politicians like Obama are far worse for the citizens and taxpayers than any police officer. Politicians are liars, crooks, frauds and criminals at a far higher rate than cops. But the unrivaled example of lies, fraud and taxpayer abuse is Obama himself. He lies about virtually everything. He said, “If you like your insurance, you can keep it.” A lie! He promised we could keep our doctors, too. A lie! He said rates would go down, not gigantically up, because of Obamacare. A lie! He claimed Obamacare wasn’t a colossal tax. A lie! He lied about Benghazi and the IRS scandal. The list of lies, fraud & violations of the Constitution by Obama is long and seemingly endless. What a cop does to some random perp doesn’t affect my life. But lies & crimes committed by politicians like Obama dramatically affect all of our lives.


Obama Says Police Officers Should Wear Body Cameras: So, Why Shouldn’t The Unrivaled Example Of Lies, Fraud And Taxpayer Abuse — Obama Himself — Wear One Too?

Obama Should Wear A Body Camera

December 11, 2014 By Wayne Allyn Root — Personal Liberty

Watch the video here — http://personalliberty.com/obama-wear-body-camera/ — or read the text of it below:

Hello. I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. President Obama is right— finally. This could be the only time in six years that I’ve agreed with Obama. He says that police officers should wear body cameras. Bravo. That’s the only smart move of his presidency. That’s what I’d call a no-brainer.

Of course, Obama wants it for a different reason than I do. He is suspicious of cops. He thinks cops are often bad guys. He thinks cops are racist.

I think cops have an impossible job. I think cops deal with terrible people all day long. I think if people treated cops with respect, 90 percent of all violent confrontations with police and shootings by police would never happen. Body cameras are the perfect solution for both concerns.

It doesn’t matter who is right: Obama or I. Body cameras solve the problem. Police will act completely differently, knowing they are on camera. And so will the people that cops deal and interact with every day. I’ve been in the television business my entire adult life. I’ve hosted, created and produced multiple hit television shows. And I can tell you that people always act differently when they know cameras are rolling.

So body cameras work for both Obama and me. Obama wants cops to stop beating and shooting unarmed or innocent citizens. Well, you can bet cops will think twice before escalating a confrontation, knowing it’s all being recorded. And, of course, so will the people on camera interacting with the police. Everyone will be on his best behavior.

The main reason I support body cameras is far different than Obama’s. I want to avoid or drastically reduce lawsuits against the police, thereby saving taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars annually. If a police interaction with bad guys is all captured on camera and the video proves the cop conducted himself professionally, there are no longer grounds for a lawsuit. Case closed.

My message to the bad guys is, "Smile, you’re on ‘Candid Camera!’" The cops and the taxpayers are the big winners once cops put on body cameras. I’ll bet Obama didn’t think about that.

But what’s good for the goose is good for the gander. If Obama is such a fan of body cameras for police officers, why shouldn’t politicians wear them too?

History proves politicians like Obama are far worse for the citizens and taxpayers than any police officer. Politicians are liars, crooks, frauds and criminals at a far higher rate than cops. Heck, at one point last year, we suffered a crime wave by Democratic politicians from coast to coast. Many of them will go to prison.

But the worst example of lies, fraud and taxpayer abuse is Obama himself. He lies about virtually everything. He said, "If you like your insurance, you can keep it." Not true: Millions of Americans have had their insurance canceled, with millions more to come. He promised we could keep our doctors, too. Not true. He said rates would go down $2,500 per family, per year because of Obamacare. Instead, rates went up dramatically during Obama’s presidency. Now, because of Obamacare they are going up dramatically again. Our deductibles and co-pays have doubled, too. He also claimed it wasn’t a tax, yet it turned out to be one of the biggest tax increases in history.

Don’t take my word for it. Just watch Jonathan Gruber (the architect of Obamacare) on video. He says Obama lied. He admits Obama and the architects of Obamacare committed fraud to fool the stupid voters. He admits they couldn’t tell you the truth, or you wouldn’t have bought the product. That’s fraud. And we got him on video saying it. See how valuable video cameras are?

Don’t forget Benghazi. Obama and Hillary Clinton claimed that fiasco was all due to a movie that no one in the Middle East ever watched. That’s called a cover-up. Wouldn’t you have liked a body camera in the room as Obama and Clinton made up that story?

Don’t forget the IRS scandal. Obama claimed it was tiny, unimportant and never rose above a few bad apples in one office in Cincinnati. All of that has been proven untrue. The attacks came from many IRS offices across the country. The attacks just happened to be aimed at groups and individuals that criticized the president — like me. I was targeted and attacked from the Las Vegas IRS office.

Next, we found out thousands of IRS emails had been destroyed — emails that could implicate the White House in the targeting. Just last week, we found out that the IRS handed confidential and private tax information to the White House. Why? Wouldn’t you have liked a body camera in the room as Obama met with the heads of the IRS and the IRS government employees union hundreds of times to plan and plot this massive scandal?

The list of lies, fraud and violations of the Constitution by Obama is long and seemingly endless.

What a cop does to some random perp doesn’t affect my life. But lies and crimes committed by politicians like Obama dramatically affect all of our lives.

The deals they cut in the backroom should be watched and heard by all of us. We, the taxpayers, pay their salaries. It’s time that politicians — in particular, presidents — wear body cameras. It’s time for real transparency. It’s time for politicians to live by the same rules as the rest of us.

So let’s agree with Obama about putting body cameras on cops. Then let’s make him live by the same rules as the rest of us. It’s time to watch the politicians.

Look at the bright side. If nothing else, we can finally learn how good Obama’s golf game is.

I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. God bless America.





U.S. Chamber of Commerce Will Fight Obama Regulations: New EPA ozone regulations alone could result in more than 600,000 annual job losses
U.S. Chamber of Commerce President Thomas Donohue said Tuesday that his group is launching renewed efforts to reform the nation’s regulatory process, which he says is currently more about politics than protections. “Our regulatory system is increasingly opaque and driven by political agendas. It lacks basic accountability, it often employs flawed data and questionable science, it ignores Congressional intent and too often prevents citizens or their representatives from weighing in on proposed rules in any meaningful way.” “We currently have a government that has shifted into regulatory overdrive,” Donohue said. “The administration knows time is running out and there is every incentive and temptation to ram new rules through the pipeline and never mind the process, the research, the cost or the benefits.”


U.S. Chamber of Commerce Will Fight Obama Regulations: New EPA ozone regulations alone could result in more than 600,000 annual job losses

U.S. Chamber Will Fight Obama Regulations

12-02-2014 — Personal Liberty News Desk

U.S. Chamber of Commerce President Thomas Donohue said Tuesday that his group is launching renewed efforts to reform the nation’s regulatory process, which he says is currently more about politics than protections.

"There is a compelling need to reform the regulatory process itself not for the purpose of steering it to specific outcomes, but to ensure that we will have rules that really work," he said, according to The Hill.

"Our regulatory system is increasingly opaque and driven by political agendas. It lacks basic accountability, it often employs flawed data and questionable science, it ignores Congressional intent and too often prevents citizens or their representatives from weighing in on proposed rules in any meaningful way."

Donohue said that the Chamber of Commerce is prepared to increase lobbying efforts to support Congressional passage of the Regulatory Accountability Act, legislation designed to make agencies consider lower-cost regulatory options.

The business advocate also called on Congress to step up its efforts to combat burdensome regulation by requiring agencies to fully disclose regulatory impact information and allow peer review. He also wants lawmakers to vote on costly rules.

"We currently have a government that has shifted into regulatory overdrive," Donohue said. "The administration knows time is running out and there is every incentive and temptation to ram new rules through the pipeline and never mind the process, the research, the cost or the benefits."

Donohue said new EPA ozone regulations could result in more than 600,000 annual job losses.

"How come we have those great broad numbers?" he asked. "Why don’t we know? Because we’re not able to get the facts out of the regulating agencies and it takes forever to sort through what they have done."





Lessons From The Ferguson Verdict — From A Middle-Class White Guy
The final lesson is perhaps the most important. The Ferguson verdict is nothing but a weapon of mass distraction. It pales in comparison to really important developments like Obama’s violating the Constitution and breaking the rule of law by ignoring Congress, checks and balances, and the will of the people; and, issuing 3,415 new federal regulations on Thanksgiving eve that will badly damage business, kill jobs and dramatically raise consumers’ costs and energy bills, thereby driving the economy off a cliff. So my big takeaway from Ferguson is: use common sense and keep your eyes on the things that really matter in your life like your job, your health insurance, & the U.S. Constitution. Oh, and one more thing: Don’t charge at an armed policeman. **Blacks commit more violent crimes by far. In 2010, 62,593 blacks were victims of white-on-black crime. But 320,082 whites were victims of black-on-white crime[Dept. Of Justice]


Lessons From The Ferguson Verdict — From A Middle-Class White Guy

Lessons From The Ferguson Verdict — From A Middle-Class White Guy

November 27, 2014 by Wayne Allyn Root — Personal Liberty

Watch the video here — http://personalliberty.com/lessons-ferguson-verdict-middle-class-white-guy/ — or read the text of it below:

Hi I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. Happy Thanksgiving to all.

The Ferguson, Missouri, rioters put on one heck of a show for all the world to see on Monday night, didn’t they? That was not your traditional American Thanksgiving display. But what do I know? I’m just a middle-class white guy. I was raised to respect property, respect police, never say "F– the police," never desecrate the American flag, never burn down stores in my own neighborhood, love my country, believe in the American dream, study hard, get straight A’s, work hard and good things will happen. And funny enough, my life has worked out pretty well.

Maybe there’s a lesson there for the Ferguson protesters.

I’ve watched the proceedings in Ferguson from August until the verdict was read on Monday night. I watched on Monday night as the Ferguson crowd rioted, set police cars on fire, set buildings on fire, fired shots at police, threw bottles and stones at police, and attacked small businesses.

And to me, the lessons of Ferguson are crystal clear.
First, if the verdict had gone the other way (against the police officer) and angered law- and-order conservatives like me, conservatives wouldn’t have rioted, or thrown bottles, or burned our neighborhoods down. We don’t do things like that. We have too much respect for law and order and property rights.

We also own homes and businesses, so we have too much to lose. Maybe the people protesting and rioting should learn a lesson here. Liberals and media elites will say "people riot and loot because they have nothing." I believe the opposite is true; people have nothing because they riot and loot. It’s their attitude that causes them to have nothing in life.

Secondly, it’s not smart to burn down your own community. The rest of the world stops feeling sorry for you and just wants to avoid you. The stores you’re burning or looting are often owned by blacks, or other minority small-business owners. They will be forced to leave and never come back. The rest of the world won’t dare replace them. Who’d want to invest in a neighborhood where people burn, destroy or rob their own community businesses?

Third, I was taught by my father that when a cop stops you or asks you a question, you hand over your ID and say "Yes, sir" or "No, sir." Respond politely, with respect. That could be why no policeman has ever hurt me, shot me or killed me — or anyone I’ve ever known. If you choose to curse, or shove, or punch, or struggle with a man with a badge and gun, there is a strong likelihood you’re going to wind up injured or dead. So instead of complaining about racism, or protesting, or rioting, how about saying "Yes, sir" or "No, sir." Then you won’t have anything to protest or riot about.

Fourth, open your eyes and mind to the truth, not to liberal media propaganda. Millions of people are surprised, saddened and shocked by the Ferguson grand jury’s verdict. Really? Why? My educated guess about the case was published here at Personal Liberty in August ("I Stand with Police Officer Wilson"). My gut instincts about what happened that day — only days after the incident — have proven to be 100 percent accurate.

From simply taking the time to look at the facts in multiple media, I figured out what happened. Evidence that anyone could find in the media left me convinced the officer had probable cause to stop Michael Brown. He probably knew (or quickly figured out) that Brown was the suspect in the strong-armed robbery of a convenience store nearby and he struggled in the car with Brown, where a gun went off. Brown ran from the officer, then decided to turn around and charge the officer, who clearly felt his life was in danger and responded in self-defense. Those were my educated guesses from the first days after the shooting.

The prosecutor (and grand jury verdict) just declared all of my original gut instincts to be fact. How did I know all of that — back in August? I educated myself. I read. I listened. I watched. I wasn’t biased. It was all right there for anyone to see — back then. I predicted the police officer would never be indicted — back then. This is not brain surgery. You only have to have common sense, think for yourself and ignore rabble- rousers like Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and the Black Panthers, trying to stir up trouble and profit from crisis and racial strife.

The truth isn’t black or white. It isn’t conservative or liberal. It’s based on evidence and fact. It was clear to me the police officer was justified from the first days after the shooting.

Then there’s lesson No. 5; I call it "the Obama lesson." That split TV screen of Obama pleading for calm and praising Attorney General Eric Holder for the work he did to promote peace and calm next to the other screen of rioting, looting, burning and shooting is the perfect image for the entire Obama presidency. The iconic image of Obama is a perfect mixture of incompetence, cluelessness and lawlessness. Some might call it "the money shot."

It was as if Obama was saying, "If you like your city, you can keep your city." That promise would’ve held as much truth as, "If you like your health insurance, you can keep your health insurance."

But the final lesson is perhaps the most important. The Ferguson verdict is nothing but a weapon of mass distraction. It pales in comparison to really important developments like Obama’s violating the Constitution and breaking the rule of law by ignoring Congress, checks and balances, and the will of the people to issue amnesty for millions of illegal immigrants, i.e., criminals; the words of Obamacare architect Jonathan Gruber indicating deception, misrepresentation and fraud were used to sell Obamacare; and plans for 3,415 new federal regulations being publicly announced on Thanksgiving eve when no one is paying attention.

Brown’s death is a tragedy for the Brown family. But it has very little effect on the daily lives of the rest of us. On the other hand, 3,415 new federal regulations will badly damage business, kill jobs and dramatically raise consumers’ costs and energy bills, thereby driving the economy off a cliff. That’s the real tragedy. That’s the real definition of "deadly."

So my big takeaway from Ferguson is: Use common sense and keep your eyes on the things that really matter in your life like your job, or your health insurance, or the U.S. Constitution, which has given us the greatest nation in world history. Watch what the president does to you — and to that Constitution.

Oh, and one more thing: Don’t charge at an armed policeman. But, hey, I guess I’m just a middle-class white guy. What do I know?





Will the Republicans Have The Guts To Play Hardball?: Hey, Republicans, you’ve finally got the votes to stop Obama. So how are you going to do it? We can’t wait to hear your answer
Barack Obama has certainly tossed down the gauntlet in front of the Republicans with his executive order on immigration. Of course, his actions now fly in the face of his own 22 repeated assertions over the past six years that he did not have the authority to do so. So the question today is: What should the Republicans do about the president’s unconstitutional actions? Throwing some sand in the works isn’t the worst thing that could happen. No, a much worse thing would be for Republicans to roll over and allow Obama to continue to trammel the Constitution for two more years. Hey, Republicans, you’ve finally got the votes to stop Obama. So how are you going to do it? We can’t wait to hear your answer.


Will the Republicans Have The Guts To Play Hardball?: Hey, Republicans, you’ve finally got the votes to stop Obama. So how are you going to do it? We can’t wait to hear your answer.

Will the Republicans Have The Guts To Play Hardball?

November 25, 2014 by Chip Wood — Personal Liberty

Barack Obama has certainly tossed down the gauntlet in front of the Republicans, hasn’t he? In an address to the nation last Thursday night, he finally confirmed all of the trial balloons the White House had launched, promising he would issue some sort of executive order on immigration.

Turns out the reality goes even further than we were warned about. Although the president has said the Administration will establish procedures that will permit some 5 million illegal aliens to remain in this country and receive work permits, he is in effect stopping the deportation of all illegals, except for criminals, terrorists and the latest arrivals. By doing so, Obama has made sure that almost all of the estimated 11 million to 12 million illegals in this country are in no danger of being deported. In effect, he has granted amnesty to all but a handful of them.

Of course, his actions now fly in the face of his repeated assertions over the past six years that he did not have the authority to do so. "The problem is," Obama said last year, "that I’m the president of the United States. I’m not the emperor of the United States. My job is to execute laws that are passed."

That was just one of 22 different times Obama was recorded saying that he did not have the authority to do what he just did. In a Town Hall meeting back in 2011, the president

said:

There are enough laws on the books by Congress that are very clear in terms of how we have to enforce our immigration system that for me to simply, through executive order, ignore those congressional mandates would not conform with my appropriate role as President.

But that was then; this is now. So the question today is: What should the Republicans do about the president’s unconstitutional actions?

In last Thursday’s column, I analyzed one possible strategy: Congress could cut off the funds the president will need to implement his program. The Constitution is unequivocally clear that all spending bills must originate in the House of Representatives. If Congress won’t fund it, the president can’t spend it.

The liberal media are already screaming that doing such a thing could lead to another government shutdown. They claim that this would be disastrous for Republicans.

There are two false assumptions here. First, the only way a shutdown would occur would be if the president vetoed any spending bill that Congress passed. That could happen if Congress approved a single continuing resolution. But what if Congress approved a series of authorizations? Would Obama really veto every one of them? I suspect that’s one publicity war he would lose, no matter how much the mainstream media tried to defend and protect him.

But even if that were to happen and the government had to shut down for a while, would it really be a disaster for the country or for the Republican Party? Based on what just happened in the midterm elections, I don’t think so. The voters made it pretty darn clear they want the GOP to run things for a while. There didn’t seem to be any residue of anger over the shutdown two years ago.

Controlling the purse strings is just one of the things the new Republican majority could do. Another is to refuse to vote on any of Obama’s nominations for various federal posts. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) is one of the fiercest advocates of drawing this line in the sand.

Both parties have used this tactic on occasion in the past. But I can’t remember when it was applied across the board for an extended period of time. If the goal is to force the president to back down, I don’t think this will do that.

But throwing some sand in the works isn’t the worst thing that could happen. No, a much worse thing would be for Republicans to roll over and allow Obama to continue to trammel the Constitution for two more years.

Hey, Republicans, you’ve finally got the votes to stop him. So how are you going to do it? I can’t wait to hear your answer.

Until next time, keep some powder dry.

–Chip Wood





Constitutional Crisis: Like All Wannabe Dictators Gone Mad With Despotic Power Ambitions, Obama Doesn’t Give A Damn That The American People Don’t Want His Treacherous Programs That Are Destroying America; Obama Just Gives A Damn That He Does Want Them [illegal amnesty for illegal immigrants, Obamacare, a jobless welfare economy & etc]
The USA has a "rogue president" who has decided he is going to do what he wants to do & "to hell with the Constitution," said Pat Buchanan. And even though Obama knows he doesn't really have the authority to enact his amnesty plan, he's going ahead and like a dictator he's doing it himself, & he says, impeach me and be damned. We have a president of the USA who says I'm not going to enforce the laws that require me to basically deport & remove [illegals] from society and send [them] back where they came from, people who have broken into our country and broken our laws, said Buchanan. He called Obama’s executive action plan a "constitutional crisis”.


Constitutional Crisis: Like All Wannabe Dictators Gone Mad With Despotic Power Ambitions, Obama Doesn’t Give A Damn That The American People Don’t Want His Treacherous Programs That Are Destroying America; Obama Just Gives A Damn That He Does Want Them [illegal amnesty for illegal immigrants, Obamacare, a jobless welfare economy & etc.]

'Rogue President' Says 'To Hell With Constitution'

Newsmax — Thursday, November 20, 2014 — By Sandy Fitzgerald

The United States has a "rogue president" who has decided he is going to do what he wants to do and "to hell with the Constitution," columnist Pat Buchanan, former adviser to Presidents Ronald Reagan and Richard Nixon, told Newsmax TV Thursday.

"We have a rogue president who tonight is going to announce that he is going to do something he said not so long ago, one year ago, he does not have the legal or constitutional authority to do," Buchanan told "America's Forum" host J.D. Hayworth.

"This is being done for his political base in the Hispanic community. He looked at the election returns and said, with Republicans strengthened like this, there's nothing I can get done with Congress so I'm going to do what I can do and what I want to do and to hell with the Constitution."

Buchanan also said he does not dispute the numbers from the latest Wall Street Journal/NBC poll,  which shows that most Americans don't agree with Obama taking executive action on immigration.

"The country realizes that the president here is acting in a usurpacious manner, that he is seizing power that he does not have," the conservative columnist told Hayworth. "Why is he doing it now? Why didn't he do it two years ago? If he had this authority why didn't he do it four years ago?"

Obama has always realized that he did not have the authority under the Constitution to enact an executive order granting amnesty to undocumented immigrants, said Buchanan.

And while there have been some who have warned about the potential for violence, once Obama announces his executive action, which was delayed earlier this year until after the midterm elections, Buchanan said he wouldn't predict violence, but he also would not be surprised by it.

"If you get wild celebrations in the community of illegal aliens around the country cheering and laughing at the rest of the country, you completely demoralize the Border Patrol and the sheriffs along that border who have been fighting this good fight for a long, long time and who have tried to do their job," Buchanan told Hayworth. "They're now being told everything you've done to protect the border and to maintain us as one nation, one people, is by the boards.

"We're in another country now and I can't express how much I feel this diminishes us as one nation, one people, and one country when you've said, in effect, folks who can walk into your house and sit down at the table are entitled to do so and entitled to remain," said Buchanan. "We cannot deport them and deportation is out of the question."

Further, Buchanan called the president's decision on executive action an "ollie-ollie-oxen-free invitation" for people who are not arriving legally, and an insult to the people who have been patient and taken the legal steps to become American citizens.

"Folks who have waited to become American citizens because they love the country and this is where they want to raise their children, they all look like fools now," said Buchanan. "They all look like people who obeyed America's laws and followed policies and our customs and traditions, and the guys who went up and walked across the border or pushed their kids across the border, they triumphed. They succeeded. They've won."

Buchanan called the executive action plan a "constitutional crisis," and said Congress will  have to "contain and control Obama" until his presidency is over in two years.

"We have a president of the United States who says, I'm not going to enforce the laws that require me to basically deport and remove [illegals] from society and send [them] back where they came from, people who have broken into our country and broken our laws," said Buchanan. "Yeah, you'd have something of a constitutional crisis."

However, he doesn't believe impeachment is the answer. Buchanan said there are not enough votes for that extreme action and "you don't want to put [Vice President] Joe Biden in there."

But he does believe that what Obama is doing is "an impeachable act."

"That doesn't mean that the Congress should immediately move to impeach him, but it's very difficult to see how there's any comity, any union, or any agreement in the next two years," Buchanan told Hayworth.

And even though Obama knows he doesn't really have the authority to enact his amnesty plan, and he won't be able to get the legislation through the incoming Republican-controlled Congress, "he's going ahead and like a dictator he's doing it himself," said Buchanan. "And he says, impeach me and be damned."

Buchanan said that if he were advising Obama like he advised former Presidents Reagan and Nixon, he'd  remind him that his legacy will be as a president who broke the law and violated the Constitution.

Buchanan said he'd tell Obama: "You believe it's going to be a good legacy, but I can tell you this, you yourself said you will be breaking the law and violating the Constitution. So that's going to stick, that's going to be a stigma around you, and I'll tell you this, Mr. President, when some problems arise from these folks whom you're giving an executive amnesty to in this country, people are going to turn and say that happened because the president of the United States gave them a blanket pardon."

Buchanan said he'd also tell Obama that while he may feel the executive action "is going to be treated as some kind of Emancipation Proclamation," it isn't.

"By what authority does he decide 4 or 5 million get amnesty and 4 or 5 million don't?" said Buchanan. "Is there something in the law that says that's the right figure? There's nothing in the law. He has no law to back up what he's doing."





House Republicans File Lawsuit Against Obama Over Obamacare: Unlawful and unconstitutional funding being used
The lawsuit is the first legal challenge of its kind by a chamber of Congress and came one day after the president’s announcement that he was using executive authority to institute immigration reform. Republicans have discussed whether to expand their health care lawsuit to include the immigration actions. In the statement announcing the lawsuit, Boehner said: “Time after time, the president has chosen to ignore the will of the American people and re-write federal law on his own without a vote of Congress. That’s not the way our system of government was designed to work.” “Congress has never appropriated funds for the program,” Boehner said in a statement Friday. “The administration is instead unlawfully and unconstitutionally using funds from a separate Treasury Department account … and thereby unilaterally altering the structure of the health care law.”


House Republicans File Lawsuit Against Obama Over Obamacare: Unlawful and unconstitutional funding being used

House GOP Sues Obama Over Health Care Law

Personal Liberty — November 21, 2014 By Tribune News Service

House Republicans have filed a lawsuit against President Obama over his health care law, Speaker John Boehner announced Friday, making good on a resolution passed in July.

The lawsuit is the first legal challenge of its kind by a chamber of Congress and came one day after the president’s announcement that he was using executive authority to institute immigration reform. Republicans have discussed whether to expand their health care lawsuit to include the immigration actions.

In the statement announcing the lawsuit, Boehner said: "Time after time, the president has chosen to ignore the will of the American people and re-write federal law on his own without a vote of Congress. That’s not the way our system of government was designed to work."

Republicans have taken issue with Obama’s failure to enforce a provision of the 2010 Affordable Care Act, which requires businesses to pay a penalty if they don’t offer basic health insurance to employees. The Obama administration has delayed the provision twice, and it won’t fully take effect until 2016.

Boehner said the lawsuit also will address Republican opposition to an estimated $175 billion in payments to insurance companies over the next 10 years as part of a cost-sharing program under the health care law.

"Congress has never appropriated funds for the program," Boehner said in a statement Friday. "The administration is instead unlawfully and unconstitutionally using funds from a separate Treasury Department account … and thereby unilaterally altering the structure of the health care law."

-Christine Mai-Duc





Tax Fraud Is The Law Of The Land!!: The Supreme Court Should Strike Down And Repeal Obamacare Based Upon The Videotaped Admission Of A Key Obamacare Architect: He admits that Obamacare was calculated lies & willful fraud that was intended to dupe the CBO, Congress & voters into supporting a fraudulently disguised healthcare plan that in reality was a major tax plan deliberately designed to steal and give away the hard earned income of the American people
The Supreme Court made tax fraud the law of the land only because Chief Justice Roberts ruled that Obamacare was actually a tax hidden within a healthcare bill; a tax that was passed by Congress only because it was fraudulently disguised as a healthcare bill. So, fraud is legal and can actually become a law as long as the fraud is committed by and adjudicated by federal government employees? But, federal government employees can turn around and judge & incarcerate private sector employees for the identical fraud and call them criminals?


Tax Fraud Is The Law Of The Land!!: The Supreme Court Should Strike Down And Repeal Obamacare Based Upon The Videotaped Admission Of A Key Obamacare Architect: He admits that Obamacare was calculated lies & willful fraud that was intended to dupe the CBO, Congress & voters into supporting a fraudulently disguised healthcare plan that in reality was a major tax plan deliberately designed to steal and give away the hard earned income of the American people

Obamacare Designer Admits Lies Were Necessary

 

November 13, 2014 By Chip Wood -- Personal Liberty

Jonathan Gruber, a professor at MIT who was also one of the key architects of Obamacare, told a panel last year that the Obama administration deliberately deceived the public about several aspects of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, the bill that gave birth to Obamacare. If it had told the truth, Gruber admitted, the bill would never have passed Congress.

In a video clip that just surfaced, Gruber said: "Lack of transparency is a huge political advantage. And basically, call it the stupidity of the American voter or whatever, but basically that was really, really critical to get for the thing to pass."

One of the key deceptions, Gruber acknowledged, was to keep the public from realizing that the bill was actually a major new tax. "I mean, this bill was written in a tortured way to make sure CBO [the Congressional Budget Office] did not score the mandate as taxes. If CBO scored the mandate as taxes the bill dies. OK? So it's written to do that."

To make sure the audience understood what he was saying, Gruber added, "[I]f you had a law which said that healthy people are going to pay in, you made explicit healthy people pay in and sick people get money, it would not have passed."

Let's be clear about what Gruber is saying here. He's admitting that the language of the Affordable Care Act was "tortured" so those stupid American voters wouldn't realize it is actually a massive program to redistribute wealth. Oh, and it's perfectly OK to lie to the American people about this because of the noble result: getting Obamacare passed. Or, as he said on the panel, "Look, I wish Mark was right that we could make it all transparent, but I'd rather have this law than not."

President Obama played along with the deceit, repeatedly saying that the legislation "absolutely is not a tax increase." But as it turned out, the Supreme Court later ruled that it was only the fact that Obamacare was a tax that made the darned thing constitutional.

Of course, disguising the employer mandate was just one of the deceptions that were used to get Obamacare approved. Another was Obama's massive and repeated falsehood, "If you like your plan, you can keep your plan." And the companion deceit, "If you like your doctor, you can keep you doctor."

Oh, and how about the dishonest promise that under Obamacare, the cost for health insurance would go down? Millions of Americans are learning that precisely the opposite is true, as they see the price they must pay skyrocket.

The fact of the matter is Obamacare was built on lies from the very beginning. Even the name is a fraud. The Affordable Care Act is not "affordable" -- not for millions of Americans who will be forced to pay much higher premiums for their health insurance and certainly not for us taxpayers, who are being forced to cough up billions of dollars to pay for it.

Remember that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid wasn't able to corral a single Republican vote for Obamacare. Of the 60 Democrats who obediently pulled the "aye" lever, 28 of them, or almost half, are now out of office. Some retired, so they wouldn't have to face the voters again; others tried desperately to distance themselves from the measure and their president but went down to defeat.

In January, there will be a new Republican majority in the Senate and an even larger one in the House. Let's see how quickly they can agree on a bill to repeal this monstrosity and put it on the president's desk.

Sure, Obama will veto it. We can then begin disassembling it piece by piece, while giving Republicans a powerful campaign issue for 2016.

Hey, if we can't win on this one, where can we win?

Until next time, keep some powder dry.

¨Chip Wood





Lawless President Obama Plans Another Lawless Act: Up to 80% of voters last week stated they oppose his illegal amnesty for 4.5 million illegal aliens
Obama plans to grant amnesty in the next 7 to 10 days to as many 4.5 million illegal aliens currently residing in the U.S; the Constitution grants the president no authority for such an action. Forget the specious 5.9% unemployment figure touted by the lying regime. The truth is almost 1 in 4 workers [25%] is unemployed. The rate of workers not in the job force is the highest it’s been in decades. Millions more workers are underemployed. Obama’s illegal amnesty will put up to 4.5 million illegal aliens into the pool competing for what few jobs there are available. That will drive down wages for those who are working and increase unemployment. Amnesty also would add up to 4.5 million leftist/socialist-minded voters to Democrat voter lists & to government welfare lists and help union backers to add to their failing union membership rolls.


Lawless President Obama Plans Another Lawless Act: Up to 80% of voters last week stated they oppose his illegal amnesty for 4.5 million illegal aliens

Lawless President Plans Another Lawless Act

November 14, 2014 By Bob Livingston — Personal Liberty

If media reports are correct, the undocumented usurper currently despoiling the People’s House plans to change current immigration law with his pen sometime in the next seven to 10 days. The act would essentially grant amnesty to as many 4.5 million illegal aliens — many of them guilty of criminal acts beyond their illegal presence — currently residing in the U.S.

The Constitution grants the president no authority for such an action. Article II grants the president only the power to execute laws, not write or change them on his whim simply because he cannot get Congress to bow to his will.

The Constitution, in Article I, vests all lawmaking power in Congress, and Congress alone. An executive order by President Barack Obama granting amnesty would be just one more criminal act to add to the long list of impeachable offenses committed by the country’s criminal in chief — a list I outlined in "The Case For Obama’s Impeachment."

Obama’s executive amnesty order, combined with his open invitation to Hispanics earlier this year to invade the Southern border, are/were designed to add hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of leftist/socialist-minded voters to the voter lists and ensure Democrat domination of the electoral process for years to come. It is also a sop to his union backers who are looking to add to their failing union membership rolls.

Forget the specious 5.9 percent unemployment figure touted by the lying regime. The truth is almost 1 in 4 workers is unemployed. The rate of workers not in the job force is the highest it’s been in decades. Millions more workers are underemployed. Obama’s illegal amnesty will put hundreds of thousands, if not millions more, job-seekers into the pool competing for what few jobs there are available. That will drive down wages for those who are working and increase unemployment. The most affected will be low-skilled workers, particularly minorities.

It will also make hundreds of thousands, if not millions, more eligible for welfare and other government subsidies.

American voters kicked Obama’s policies in the teeth with their vote on Nov. 4. According to exit polls, as many as 80 percent of the people voting stated they opposed executive amnesty.

Sen. Jeff Session (R-Ala.) says Congress will stop Obama’s illegal executive amnesty by explicitly barring its funding. But many Republicans would (not so secretly) like to see amnesty granted because their sugar daddy — the U.S. Chamber of Commerce — wants it as well.

We shall soon see where Republican loyalties lie. Are they for the Constitution or against it? History has shown it’s most often the latter.





Middle Class America Uprising Tells Obama To Shove It Where The Sun Doesn’t Shine: Mid-term election results are a total rejection, repudiation and condemnation of everything Obama believes in
My national bestseller “The Murder of the Middle Class” pointed out what Obama and his socialist cabal were doing to America. What we all just witnessed was the uprising and revenge of the middle-class. What caused the middle class to rise up against Obama? The root of Obama’s Election Day debacle was the Obama lies about the jobless economy and the twin disasters of Obamacare & Ebola; add in the ISIS threat and Obama’s push for an open southern border and amnesty for millions of illegal immigrants. This “massive and historic” GOP landslide will usher in a dramatic rebuke to Obama and a dramatic change in political power. The question is: What will the GOP do with it? The answers to these questions will determine the future of the Republican Party, American politics and America itself.


Middle Class America Uprising Tells Obama To Shove It Where The Sun Doesn’t Shine: Mid-term election results are a total rejection, repudiation and condemnation of everything Obama believes in

Revenge Of The Middle Class

Watch the video here — http://personalliberty.com/revenge-middle-class/ — or read the text of it below:

Hello. I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. I don’t mean to say "I told you so,"

but I told you so!

I was the first political commentator in the country to predict a GOP landslide in Tuesday’s election. I described the predicted GOP landslide as "massive and historic." I made the prediction not only here at Personal Liberty but for weeks now on hundreds of radio stations, American TV, Canadian TV and at Fox News.

Tuesday’s results literally define "massive and historic." The GOP needed to win six U.S. Senate seats. It looks like they’ve won a remarkable nine (with a comfortable lead in Alaska and a projected win in the December Louisiana runoff). The 12 House seats won by the GOP now expand the GOP majority to historic levels.

But there are more highlights. The GOP destroyed Jimmy Carter’s grandson in Georgia’s governor race. Governor Scott Walker was re-elected in Wisconsin despite tens of millions of dollars spent by unions across the country. The GOP elected governors in deep, deep blue states like Illinois, Massachusetts and Maryland. Barack Obama himself campaigned for the Democrat governor candidate Anthony Brown in Maryland. The man that some in the media called "mini Obama" went down to a stunning defeat. Michelle Obama campaigned for Senator Mark Pryor in Arkansas. He lost big time in the same state where he won 79 percent of the vote only six years ago. Hillary and Bill Clinton campaigned all over the country; almost every candidate they supported was wiped out (only Senator Jeanne Sheehan in New Hampshire won). And the defeat of a Democratic governor in the president’s home state hasn’t happened since 1892. When I predicted "massive and historic," I might have understated the results!

So what happened? How did I know what was about to transpire?

This was a total rejection, repudiation and condemnation of everything Obama believes in. This was middle class America telling Obama to shove it where the sun don’t shine. I wrote the national bestseller "The Murder of the Middle Class" pointing out what Obama and his socialist cabal were doing to America, capitalism and the great American middle class. What we all just witnessed was a middle-class uprising. This was the revenge of the middle class.

What woke the sleeping giant? What caused the middle class to rise up against Obama? In my previous commentaries I explained that the root of Obama’s Election Day debacle would be the Obama lies about the economy and the twin disasters of Obamacare and Ebola.

Let’s start with the economy. Obama constantly repeats the lie that the "economy is improving" and "we are in recovery." But middle-class America knows otherwise. The election results prove middle-class voters are no longer buying Obama’s lies or the government’s manipulated economic statistics. In exit polls 70 percent of voters said the economy is bad, versus 30 percent that called it "improving."

Then there’s the centerpiece of this middle-class economic disaster known as "Obamacare." Millions of Americans have either seen their health insurance canceled or gotten dramatic premium price increases. These were the angry, intense, motivated voters of the 2014 midterm elections. This was a vote to gain revenge on the man who promised, "If you like your insurance, you can keep your insurance."

Then there’s Ebola. Obama’s response to this potential deadly pandemic has ranged from inept and incompetent to downright dangerous. Look no further than the new Ebola czar, who has no medical background and who has never been seen again since the day his appointment was announced. Maybe he’s in quarantine. Ebola made it clear to angry middle-class Americans that our president is not keeping our children safe at night. I always believed that Ebola was simply "the straw that broke the camel’s back." Ebola may have so far only killed one person in America, but it just killed the entire Democratic Party.

Now throw in our open southern border, Obama’s failure to foresee the rise of ISIS, his lack of a coherent strategy to fight ISIS and this jobless economy, and anyone but a Washington, D.C., insider could clearly see a Democratic Party disaster in Tuesday’s election.

But the reality is elections aren’t won or lost just based on issues. Elections are won based on "the ground game." It’s not who supports a candidate or party that matters; it’s who brings the most voters to the polls. Back in 2012, Obama put together the most sophisticated "ground game" to get out the Democratic vote in the history of American politics.

The GOP failed miserably at the same "ground game." The GOP actually had no ground game. Their new "get out the vote" system (named ORCA) bombed on the morning of the national election, meaning the GOP never turned out a single vote.

The failure of the GOP vote tracking system changed the outcome of the entire presidential election. Having no idea if your most loyal voters have gone to the polls or not is like flying a plane blind.

Fast-forward to today. Two crucial political developments have changed in favor of the GOP. These are the two concrete reasons for the GOP landslide:

First, the GOP is now for the first time effectively competing with the Obama machine in the "ground game." The GOP turn-out-the-vote machine was so effective this time around that the GOP actually pulled even with Democrats or led in early voting in places where Republicans often lose by large percentages. This is very good news. As a matter of fact, it had never happened before. Republicans always lose the early voting, then desperately try to play catch-up on Election Day. No more.

Second, there are now voter ID laws in place in 15 states where none existed in 2012 and in 22 states where none existed in 2010. Not only are Democrats great at getting out the vote, they are even better at getting out fraudulent voters and illegal immigrant votes. Voter ID prevents election fraud. That is very bad news for Obama and his allies moving forward. If they can’t cheat and steal elections, they’ll have a much harder time winning elections.

Tuesday’s "massive and historic" GOP landslide will usher in a dramatic rebuke to Obama and a dramatic change in political power in Washington, D.C. The question is: What will the GOP do with it?

The answers to these questions will determine the future of the Republican Party, American politics and America itself. There is so much to do. Let’s get to work.

I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. Let’s all celebrate for a few days. We deserve it. See you next week. God bless America.





How Ebola Killed The Democrat Party: Democrat candidates are pretending Obama has never existed
Obama doesn’t seem concerned about Ebola. He won’t seal the border. He won’t ban flights from the Ebola zone. He named an Ebola czar who knows nothing about healthcare. He sent 4,000 U.S. military troops into harm’s way in the Ebola zone. Now plans are underway to bring non-American Ebola victims to the U.S. for treatment. Obama’s incompetence, ignorance, mental instability or callous disregard for the health of the American people is the talk of the country. While Ebola has so far done very little damage to the American people, Ebola’s chief victims appear to be Obama & the Democrat Party. Obama’s response to Ebola has finally convinced the electorate that Obama is dangerous to our health. Obama’s economic policies, healthcare policies, Ebola policies & foreign policies are all failing miserably. It’s clear that the biggest danger to America’s future is Obama.


How Ebola Killed The Democrat Party: Democrat candidates are pretending Obama has never existed

How Ebola Killed the Democratic Party

October 30, 2014 By Wayne Allyn Root — Personal Liberty

Watch the video here — http://personalliberty.com/ebola-killed-democratic-party/ — or read the text of it below:

Hi. I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. President Obama doesn’t seem concerned about Ebola. He won’t seal the border. He won’t ban flights from the Ebola zone. He named an Ebola czar who knows nothing about healthcare. He sent 4,000 U.S. military troops into harm’s way in the Ebola zone. Now a GOP congressman claims plans are underway to bring non-American Ebola victims to the U.S. for treatment.

Americans are fed up. They’ve had enough. Obama’s incompetence, ignorance, mental instability or callous disregard for the health of the American people is the talk of the country (outside of Washington, D.C.).

The irony is that while Ebola has so far done very little damage to the American people (with only one person in America dead), Ebola’s chief victims appear to be Obama and the Democratic Party. Obama’s response to Ebola has finally convinced the electorate that Obama is dangerous to our health. Ebola has finally shifted the electorate away from Obama and his Democratic Party. People finally understand the emperor has no clothes. The result is clear: A Republican landslide is forming.

How bad will the coming election results be for Obama and Democrats?

The GOP is on the cusp of another historic landslide, similar to the one I predicted publicly in 2010.

Back then, I predicted the GOP would win 50 to 60 congressional seats. The experts said I was out of my mind. The GOP won 63 seats.

It was the biggest landslide in almost a century. Ironically, it was all based on a fear of Obamacare.

This time, polls suggest the results on Nov. 4 will be even worse than 2010. Polls show generic Republican congressional candidates leading by more than four years ago. This time, the results are based on the real-life results of Obamacare, combined with a fear of the healthcare scare of our lifetime: Ebola.

How bad is this coming landslide? CNN reports that Democrats are trailing badly even in Massachusetts.

Democrats will be wiped out. It’s all breaking wrong for Obama and the Democrats. Want proof? Here’s a reality more telling than polls.

It’s fall. Leaves are changing color. That means political campaign time. Congress is up for re-election. This is always when presidents are crisscrossing the nation, campaigning full-time for their candidates. But something strange is happening this year. There’s no president in sight. Obama is so invisible there are rumors he’s in the witness protection program.

Democratic candidates are making believe Obama has never existed. Yes, I said Democrats. His Democrats. The same Democrats who supported his policies. The same Democrats who passed his policies. The same Democrats who proudly took credit for "saving" the economy. The same Democrats who took credit for "saving" healthcare. The same Democrats who promised to "chase ISIS to the gates of hell."

That was, of course, before they went door to door in their districts and found out from their own constituents that the economy hasn’t been saved, healthcare has been ruined and ISIS is laughing at and mocking Obama.

Now those same Democrats — Obama’s brothers and sisters in socialist policy — are on the run from Obama like he’s contagious. The medical term might be "loser’s disease." They don’t want Obama anywhere near them. Not on the stage with them. Not in a photo. Not in the same city. Not in the same state. Obama is as toxic as Ebola — to Democrats!

Even Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz won’t answer questions about the President. What’s the matter, Debbie, cat got your tongue?

Suddenly, Democratic allies of Obama claim they’ve never met Obama. They’ve never been in the same room as Obama. They’ve never heard of Obama. They’re diving off stages like trained acrobats to avoid appearing in a picture with Obama. They won’t even admit they ever voted for Obama. "Obama who?"

It’s like a real-life version of Jimmy Stewart’s "It’s a Wonderful Life." Obama is alive and he gets to actually watch a world where people claim he’s never existed. To Democrats, the past six years never happened. Amazing.

Even The New York Times is commenting publicly about it. The Times lamented in a recent editorial that only one Democratic Senate candidate in the whole country (Gary Peters of Michigan) is willing to be pictured next to Obama anywhere in the country. Most won’t even admit they voted for him (see Alison Lundergan Grimes of Kentucky). The Times is aghast. "Why aren’t they defending his policies?" The Times asks in shock and dismay.

Could it be because in the real world Obama’s economic policies, healthcare policies, Ebola policies and foreign policies are all failing miserably? Could it be because the American middle class finally understands that the biggest danger to America’s future is sitting in the White House?

Thank goodness Ebola has not exploded into a pandemic inside America — yet. But make no mistake: Ebola is deadly. And there are certainly two high-profile victims: Obama and the Democratic Party.

I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. I’ll see you next week — after the great Republican landslide of 2014. God bless America.





Which Brutal Disease Is More Toxic To America: Ebola Or Obama?
Ebola is a terrible threat. Obama is already terribly toxic. Obama has destroyed America’s economy, healthcare system, national interests and reputation. Examples: Ebola: Threatens to damage the economy. Obama: already has destroyed the economy. More than 92 million working-age Americans are not working with 10 million fewer Americans working than on the day Obama took office. Ebola: The costs for Ebola are frightening but Ebola is with us for weeks or months. Then it’s gone. Obama: The $7 trillion in debt added by Obama will cause decades of pain for Americans. Ebola: Might overwhelm the U.S. healthcare system and result in higher health insurance premiums. Obama: Obamacare has already wrecked the U.S. healthcare system with premiums up more in the past year than in the prior 8 years combined; even shockingly higher premiums are being intentionally delayed by Obama until after the November 2014 election.


Which Brutal Disease Is More Toxic To America: Ebola Or Obama?

Is Ebola Or Obama More Toxic To America?

October 23, 2014 By Wayne Allyn Root — Personal Liberty Digest

Watch the video here — http://personalliberty.com/ebola-obama-toxic-america/ — or read the text of it below:

Hi. I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. From my commentaries the past few weeks, you know I’m concerned about a potential Ebola pandemic inside America. Nonetheless, Ebola is a worry about a potential problem, a theoretical problem. No one knows yet how much damage Ebola can do to America.

On the other hand, we have already experienced the damage, destruction and pain of Obama. Let’s compare Ebola to Obama.

Ebola: So far, one dead and two nurses infected.

Obama: Almost 50 million Americans on food stamps, 108 million on welfare or other entitlement programs and an all-time record number on disability. More than $3.7 trillion has been spent on welfare over the past five years under Obama.

Ebola: The healthcare, decontamination and security costs for Ebola are frightening. Each patient could cost in excess of $1 million to treat. But so far, there are only a handful of patients. Ebola is with us for weeks or months. Then it’s gone.

Obama: The $7 trillion in debt added by Obama (so far) will cause decades of pain for American consumers and taxpayers, damage middle-class quality of life and reduce U.S. economic growth for many generations to come.

Ebola: Threatens to damage various sectors of the economy, but no one knows how bad it might be.

Obama: already destroyed the economy. More than 92 million working-age Americans are not working. There are 10 million fewer Americans working than on the day Obama took office (even though the population is dramatically higher). We now have the lowest workforce participation rate in recorded history.

Ebola: This dreadful virus might overwhelm the U.S. healthcare system and result in higher health insurance premiums to pay for the massive cost.

Obama: No guesswork is needed. The facts are in. Obamacare has already wrecked the U.S. healthcare system and dramatically increased our premium costs. Premiums were up more in the past year than in the prior eight years combined. But the worst is yet to come. Rates are going even higher (more than 60 percent in Seattle, for example). And millions of cancellation notices are going out in the next few weeks.

Ebola: This virus has no known interaction with the Internal Revenue Service. It never came after me personally.

Obama: used the IRS to try to destroy conservative donors and critics. I’m a witness. The White House clearly ordered the IRS to try to destroy me not once, but twice. Judicial Watch demanded the IRS hand over all documents related to my case. The IRS had 30 days — by law – to comply. That was 15 months ago. The IRS has broken the law of the United States for well over a year to cover up for the crimes of Obama.

Ebola: doesn’t sell guns to anyone.

Obama: In the Fast and Furious scandal, the Obama administration sold guns to Mexican drug lords that killed more than 200 Mexican citizens, plus a U.S.

border agent. So far, that’s 200 more deaths than Ebola has caused in North America.

Ebola: doesn’t trade deserters for five jihadi terrorist murderers.

Obama: demoralizes U.S. military by making that unimaginable trade, cuts the size of the military dramatically, sends 4,000 troops into the Ebola zone (with only four hours of Ebola training), and purges more generals than any president in history.

Ebola: never infected a single person at the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya.

Obama: allegedly traded arms to Muslim rebels that led to the deaths of four American heroes at Benghazi, ignored pleas from our ambassador for more security, denied a rescue mission while our heroes were under vicious attack and then covered up the tragedy by blaming it on obscure movie no one in Middle

Ebola: doesn’t steal my money or regulate me out of business.

Obama: put in place the single biggest tax increase (Obamacare) in history. Worse, he has proposed the most tax increases in history that never passed: 442. Worst of all, Obama is the No. 1 regulator in U.S. history.

Ebola: so far has not affected the border.


Obama: has crippled border security. He has left our Southern border completely unsecured from:

Massive waves of illegal immigrants desperate for cradle-to-grave entitlements.
Diseases like TB, enteroviruses and, of course, Ebola.
And terrorist cells that could cross our wide-open border and unleash a devastating 9/11-style attack on U.S. soil.

Ebola: so far poses no threat to Israel and has left the Middle East untouched.


Obama: His policies have endangered the security of Israel and led to the "Arab Spring" that toppled dictators friendly to America, leaving the Middle East under attack from radical groups like ISIS.

Add it up.

Ebola is a terrible threat. But so far, it is only a threat.

Obama is toxic. Obama has had a devastating effect upon America’s economy, healthcare system, national interests and reputation across the globe.

Ebola might give us a punch in gut.

Obama could be fatal.

I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. God bless America.





The Obamacare News Just Keeps Getting Worse: But don’t expect the mainstream media to make much of a fuss over the latest bad news about Obamacare — especially not in the days leading up to the midterm elections
Obamacare is turning out to be a costly disaster. And it’s only going to get worse. Those 30,000 Wal-Mart employees who are losing their health insurance aren’t alone. 13 states and the District of Columbia are canceling plans that are not in compliance with Obamacare. Virginia will be the hardest hit, with some 250,000 families losing their health insurance. More than 4 million people received notices last year that their healthcare plan was being canceled. Now, more cancellations are inevitable. Plus, a ton of people who will retain their health insurance are seeing staggering increases in what they have to pay. Beginning in January 2015, anyone who does not have health insurance that meets the Obamacare requirements will be subject to penalties.


The Obamacare News Just Keeps Getting Worse: But don’t expect the mainstream media to make much of a fuss over the latest bad news about Obamacare — especially not in the days leading up to the midterm elections.

The Obamacare News Just Keeps Getting Worse

October 23, 2014 By Chip Wood — Personal Liberty Digest

Those 30,000 Wal-Mart employees who are losing their health insurance aren’t alone. There’s another huge wave of cancellations of health plans coming.

Fox News reported that 13 states and the District of Columbia are canceling plans that are not in compliance with the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, otherwise known as Obamacare. Virginia will be the hardest hit, with some 250,000 families losing their health insurance.

Of course, all of the plans being canceled now weren’t in compliance a year ago. But back then, President Obama asked that they be granted a reprieve from enforcement. That is now coming to an end. As a result, hundreds of thousands more people will lose their health insurance.

Remember President Obama’s often-repeated promise, "If you like your health care plan, you can keep it?" PolitiFact labeled that one its "Lie of the Year" in 2013. More than 4 million people received notices last year that their healthcare plan was being canceled.

Now, more cancellations are inevitable. Plus, a ton of people who will retain their health insurance are seeing staggering increases in what they have to pay. The average increase is reported to be 8 percent, but some unlucky folks are getting hit with premium increases of 30 percent or more. Ouch!

No doubt, having your insurance canceled is worse than being hit with an increased premium. Earlier this month, Wal-Mart announced that it was dropping health insurance for some 30,000 part-time workers. But employees who get to keep their health coverage from the company will see increases in the premiums they pay.

Sally Welborn, a Wal-Mart vice president, said: "We can’t take our eyes off costs." She said the company, the largest private employer in the country, has seen its healthcare costs rise by $500 million more than the company expected in its current fiscal year, which ends Jan. 31.

But the bad news about Obamacare doesn’t end here. The fallout is being felt all over the place. For example, two dozen rural hospitals were forced to close their doors in 2013. That’s double the normal rate. And you can expect the closures to increase, as rural communities shrink in population, while healthcare costs continue to climb.

And according to the top executive of H&R Block, the nation’s largest tax preparer, Obamacare will add "significant complexity" to next year’s tax season. CEO William Cobb warned, "Depending on their situation, there are instances where filers may need to file multiple new tax forms and complete additional worksheets."

Beginning in January, anyone who does not have health insurance that meets the Obamacare requirements will be subject to penalties. While the law does provide for exemptions, Cobb said, "Depending on the type of exemption, the process to claim it could be quite cumbersome and time consuming."

Oh, and Cobb said people who received a subsidy for health insurance could be in for a shock, if calculations show they received a larger subsidy than they were entitled to. In theory, they’ll have to repay the federal government for any overage they got.

So, yes, Obamacare is turning out to be the costly disaster that many of us predicted it would be. And it’s only going to get worse.

But don’t expect the mainstream media to make much of a fuss over the latest bad news about Obamacare — especially not in the days leading up to the midterm elections.

If Republicans win a majority in the Senate, they’ll finally be able to break the logjam on legislation that Harry Reid imposed while he was majority leader. And while Obama would be certain to veto any bill to repeal Obamacare that finally made it to his desk, at least the country would have taken a healthy first step toward getting this bureaucratic monstrosity off our backs.

As more and more Americans are learning, it can’t happen soon enough.


Until next time, keep some powder dry.

–Chip Wood





Obama’s Gutter Politics & Hate Campaign Deliver The Sleaziest November Election Ad Yet Against Republicans: “Democrats' Dirty Deceptive Lie” Blames Republican Budget Cuts For Ebola Deaths
The truth, of course, is that the CDC doesn’t suffer from a lack of funding. Its current budget comes to a staggering $6.9 billion, which is $300 million more than Obama requested in his budget proposal for fiscal year 2014. And even the rather minor cuts to its budget in the past can’t be blamed on Republicans. The biggest reductions came about because of sequestration, a measure originally proposed by Obama. But sadly, there will be a whole lot of what are charitably called “low-information voters” who buy into this hate campaign. (“Low-information” means those dummies who can’t name their senators or congressman or even the three branches of government, but can always be counted on to check the “D” boxes when they mark their ballots.


Obama’s Gutter Politics & Hate Campaign Deliver The Sleaziest November Election Ad Yet Against Republicans: “Democrats' Dirty Deceptive Lie” Blames Republican Budget Cuts For Ebola Deaths

The Democrats’ Sleaziest Ad Yet

October 16, 2014 — By Chip Wood — Personal Liberty Digest

In a political season marked by some pretty vicious attack ads, the Democrats have just sunk to a new low. A left-wing group called the Agenda Project Action Fund boasted that it is launching "a multi-pronged blitzkrieg attack that lays blame for the Ebola crisis exactly where it belongs — at the feet of the Republican lawmakers."

Erica Payne, the group’s founder and president, said in a statement: "In launching this effort, we will be the first major progressive group to directly blame GOP budget cuts for the nearly 4,000 deaths caused by the Ebola crisis."

Sounds absolutely absurd, doesn’t it? But sadly, there will be a whole lot of what are charitably called "low-information voters" who buy into this hate campaign. ("Low-information" means those dummies who can’t name their senators or congressman or even the three branches of government, but can always be counted on to check the "D" boxes when they mark their ballots.)

The group said its new ad, which is called "Republican Cuts Kill," will target Mitch McConnell in Kentucky, Pat Roberts in Kansas and more than a dozen other Republican politicians as well as their votes that cut the budgets of the National Institute of Health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and gutted foreign aid — all programs that could have dealt with the epidemic.

By the way, this is the same sleazy organization that created the infamous TV ad where a Paul Ryan-look alike pushed an elderly woman in a wheelchair over a cliff. So you can bet they won’t let the truth get in the way of a headline-grabbing publicity campaign.

The truth, of course, is that the CDC doesn’t suffer from a lack of funding. Its current budget comes to a staggering $6.9 billion, which is $300 million more than President Obama requested in his budget proposal for fiscal year 2014.

And even the rather minor cuts to its budget in the past can’t be blamed on Republicans. The biggest reductions came about because of sequestration, a measure originally proposed by Obama.

No, the problem isn’t how much money the CDC or the NIH receives from us beleaguered taxpayers, but how they decide to spend it. In the past, they have financed studying why lesbians are more obese than straight women, the dangers of having sex with Mexican prostitutes and even a cost/benefit analysis of the sex habits of snails.

By the way, don’t hold your breath waiting for Allison Lundergan Grimes, the Democratic candidate running against McConnell in Kentucky, to denounce this example of gutter politics. Heck, she’s the same person who has refused to admit that she voted for Obama in 2008 and 2012. Not exactly a profile in courage.

The Senate race in Kentucky is so close that even a sleazy attack ad like this one could make a difference. Even before it appeared, Republican strategist Karl Rove put the election there in the toss-up category. While I’ve never been a big fan of McConnell’s less-than-inspired leadership as Senate minority leader, his defeat this November would be a severe blow to Republican morale.

Will such despicable fear mongering work? Or will it actually backfire by energizing the Republican base? We’ll find out in three more weeks.

Until next time, keep some powder dry.

–Chip Wood





Democrats Using “Phony Independents” In November Election In Attempt To Steal Senate Majority: Democratic candidates are trying to fool voters into believing that they are independents and not the party hack/Obama rubber stamps they truly are
Failing to persuade voters to support their discredited agenda, Democrats are now determined to use a false flag strategy to advance their plan to steal a Senate majority this November. By pretending that they are Independents, they can take power and help Obama implement his plan to create a single ruling party government in the U.S. Were these "independent" Democrats true Independents, their presence in our national politics would be welcome. But they are not. If elected, they would each meekly cast their ballots for Harry Reid to be Majority Leader and form a tame part of his bloc that controls the Senate. Once in the Senate, all traces of their independence will vanish and they will fall in line with the Democratic Caucus.


Democrats Using “Phony Independents” In November Election In Attempt To Steal Senate Majority: Democratic candidates are trying to fool voters into believing that they are independents and not the party hack/Obama rubber stamps they truly are

Democrats Using 'False Flag' Plan to Steal Senate

Newsmax — Monday, October 13, 2014

By: Dick Morris

Failing to persuade voters to support their discredited agenda, Democrats are now determined to use a false flag strategy to advance their plan to steal a Senate majority this November.

Masquerading as independents in four key Senate races, Democratic candidates are embracing a wolf-in-sheep's-clothing tactic to fool voters into believing that they are not the party hack/Obama rubber stamps they truly are.

By pretending that they are Independents, they can take power and help Obama implement his plan to create a single ruling party government in the U.S.

I have been warning about Obama's plan in my new bestseller "Power Grab: Obama's Dangerous Plan for a One Party Nation."

As the Democratic campaigns unfold, my main thesis is backed up by the facts on the ground.

Were these "independent" Democrats true Independents, their presence in our national politics would be welcome. But they are not.

If elected, they would each meekly cast their ballots for Harry Reid to be Majority Leader and form a tame part of his bloc that controls the Senate.

In South Dakota, former Republican senator turned liberal Democrat Larry Pressler is running as an "independent" against former Governor Mike Rounds, the Republican candidate. The latest polling puts him only two points behind Rounds. Having served three terms as a GOP senator, Pressler backed Obama in 2008 and 2012 and supports Obamacare. His strategy is either to win or to take enough votes away from Rounds to elect Rick Weiland, the overt Democratic candidate. The South Dakota seat had been written off as a certain Republican pickup until Pressler implemented the false flag strategy.

In Kansas, Republican Pat Roberts was coasting to a fourth Senate term when Greg Orman jumped into the race as an independent. Orman, who voted for Obama in 2008 and 2012, backs Obamacare, embraces the Democratic platform in toto, and actually tried to run before as a Democrat. But now he’s an "Independent." The fact that George Soros' son is reportedly hosting a fundraiser for Orman should make clear he's no independent.

In North Carolina, Republican Thom Tillis is locked in a close battle against Democratic Senator Kay Hagan. The only reason the race is close in this state Mitt Romney carried in 2012 is the presence of Sean Haugh, a pizza delivery man running as the Libertarian Party candidate. Haugh draws between 4 and 8 percent of the vote, in various polls, but all of it comes from Tillis, the Republican candidate. Where is Haugh getting his support? His money? Ask the Democrats.

In Kentucky, Alison Lundergan Grimes -- running against Republican Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell -- refuses to say if she voted for Obama in 2008 or 2012. Obviously, she did. And just as obviously, she is running away from it now. She says she will oppose Obama’s war on coal, but, if elected, it is clear she will toe the party line as Reid demands.

The Democrats first used false flag strategy in Maine in 2012 when Governor Angus King, running as an Independent, took the Republican seat formerly occupied by Olympia Snowe.

Once in the Senate, all traces of independence vanished and he fell in line with the Democratic Caucus.

Indeed, Independent Senator Bernie Sanders told his Vermont voters that he, too,  was not a Democrat.  But at least Bernie had the guts to call himself what he really is -- a Socialist.

The new Democrat "Independents" have no such courage.





A Majority Of Americans Now Believe That Obama Is A "Failed President"
The list of people who believe President Barack Obama is calling the right shots from the Oval Office appears to be shrinking daily. He's losing favor with American voters, former administration officials and even leftist pundits. A majority of Americans believe the president is a "failure". Only 43% say they would vote for Obama if the 2012 election were held today; 49% say they'd vote for Mitt Romney. Only 46% of those from states that Obama carried two years ago say they'd do so again, given another chance. Obama has spent 200 more hours whacking a golf ball than attending his daily intelligence briefings. He said he was really upset about ISIS's beheading of a journalist, and then seven minutes later he went to a golf course and was seen goofing around on the first tee. Maybe that's what Obama's true talent is: being a goofy out of whack ball whacker.


A Majority Of Americans Now Believe That Obama Is A "Failed President"

Obama Is A Failed President

October 7, 2014 By Sam Rolley -- Personal Liberty Digest

The list of people who believe President Barack Obama is calling the right shots from the Oval Office appears to be shrinking daily. He's losing favor with American voters, former administration officials and even leftist pundits.

A majority of Americans believe the president is a "failure."

An IBD/TIPP poll out this week finds that a 53 percent of Americans categorize Obama's tenure in the White House as a "failure," compared to 41 percent who rate the president a success. Six percent of those polled couldn't decide.

Among independents, Obama is viewed as a "failure" 58 percent of the time.

Young Americans 18 to 24 are the most likely to say Obama is a successful president at 77 percent. Obama does the poorest among the 25- to 44-year-olds currently battling economic troubles and a bad job situation; they call the president a failure 59 percent of the time.

The poll also finds that voter's remorse is on the rise.

IBD notes: "[O]nly 43% say they would vote for Obama if the 2012 election were held today; 49% say they'd vote for Mitt Romney. Only 46% of those from states that Obama carried two years ago say they'd do so again, given another chance."

Former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta thinks Obama has "given up."

Panetta, joining MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell Tuesday, said that Obama should be tackling the nation's problems head-on in the remaining years of his presidency. Instead, the former Defense and CIA official said, Obama has given up.

"He approaches things like a law professor in presenting a logic of his position. There is nothing wrong with that. We want to have a president who thinks through the issues. My experience in Washington is that logic alone doesn't work. Once you lay out a position, you are going to roll up your sleeves and you have to fight to get it done. That is key in Washington. In order for presidents to succeed, they cannot just -- when they run into problems, step back and give up."

"There is a feeling and I have a feeling that the leadership and the president have given up on the big issues facing this country whether it's immigration or a budget deal or infrastructure funding or trade or energy. there is a sense that you can't deal with that. This country needs that. They can't give up."

The Washington Posts' Dana Milbank, on Monday, noted that Panetta is one of many Obama "subordinates" currently lashing out at the president in a column titled, "Leon Panetta, other former Obama subordinates show stunning disloyalty."

"Whatever causes Obama's difficulty inspiring loyalty," Milbanks writes, "his failure is delighting conservatives and Republicans."

Indeed.

Even Piers Morgan wants to know: "What the hell is Obama Doing?­"

Morgan took Obama to task the "terrible imagery" provided to Americans due to the president's apparent aloofness in a recent exchange with Fox's Sean Hannity.

Morgan, like other administration critics, pointed to a lack of leadership in a discussion about ISIS.

Here's a partial transcript of the conversation:

MORGAN: And it's that lack of decision-making that I think leads to the issues we now face.

HANNITY: You know what frustrates me, Fort Hood is still officially in this country an example of workplace violence. What happened in Oklahoma, you've watched -- you've read this guy's Facebook page. It's all about jihad. They won't say it was an act of terrorism either. ISIS is not Islamic according to the president. And we're not at war with ISIS even though we're bombing them.

MORGAN: And this is all just nonsense rhetoric, because ISIS clearly is an Islamic fundamentalist organization. It's a terror group. And when they start beheading American and British citizens in these gruesome snuff movies that they're making and releasing them to the world taunting --

HANNITY: Horrible.

MORGAN: -- taunting these countries, it's not good enough to simply say, yes, I'm really upset about this beheading, and then seven minutes later, as Obama did, go to a golf course and be seen goofing around on the first tee. That really hit home to me. Someone did a survey this week. They counted up the number of hours that Obama has been playing golf since he was president. It was about 850 hours if you base it on a five-hour round.

HANNITY: More than the time he spent in his intelligence briefings.

MORGAN: He attended 42 percent of his daily briefings, total hours of that 650 or something. He spent 200 more hours whacking a golf ball than attending his daily briefings. Now, it's not as simplistic as that. Obviously he would get other briefings. But such terrible imagery to me, and I've basically been reasonably supportive of him. What the hell is he doing to groups like ISIS and others intent on causing America and Britain serious harm?

To answer Morgan's question, Obama spent Tuesday afternoon fundraising for Democrats.

Via USA Today:

After a morning of meetings at the White House, Obama will travel to Democratic Party fundraising events in New York and Connecticut.

Two afternoon events in New York City will benefit the Democratic National Committee.

After those, Obama heads to a private home in Greenwich, Conn., for a fundraiser on behalf of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee.

The president, it seems, is a better salesman than he is an executive.





The Obama Administration's Latest Jobs Report Is "Pure Fraud And Fantasy": Obama is creating a nation of desperate, government-dependent minimum wage workers who are more likely to vote Democrat
The reason unemployment dropped to the fantasy level of 5.9% is that 315,000 more Americans dropped out of the labor force last month. Most of them dropped off unemployment to get on welfare, food stamps or disability. The labor force participation rate just dropped to the lowest in 36 years; there are now 92.6 million working-age Americans not working. Monthly hiring plummeted 294,000 positions last month; the worst drop since 2010. What good are 248,000 new jobs, if they are all part-time or low-wage jobs in the lowest-quality categories. Only in the Obama economy is it good news that people stop working and join the welfare rolls because they are now more likely to vote Democrat. Obama is creating a nation of desperate, government-dependent minimum wage workers.


The Obama Administration's Latest Jobs Report Is "Pure Fraud And Fantasy": Obama is creating a nation of desperate, government-dependent minimum wage workers who are more likely to vote Democrat

Latest Jobs Report Is Pure Fraud And Fantasy

September 9, 2014 By Wayne Allyn Root -- Personal Liberty Digest

Watch the video here: http://personalliberty.com/latest-job-report-pure-fraud-fantasy/ or read the text of it below:

Hello. I'm Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. Here we go again. The latest jobs report came out last week, and it's pure fraud and fantasy -- lies and propaganda passed off as "good news." The reality is this new jobs report is a disaster for America and our middle class.

The "facts" released by our "honest and transparent government" report 248,000 new jobs created, beating expectations by a mile. The "facts" report unemployment dropping to 5.9 percent, the lowest rate since 2008.

It's as if President Obama is saying, "If you like your job, you can keep it."

But you can't. It's no more truthful or realistic than "If you like your insurance, you can keep it." Same fraud. Same lies. Same propaganda. Same banana republic mainstream media reporting lies, fantasy and propaganda as truth.

Here are the real facts about the latest jobs report.

First, the reason unemployment dropped to the fantasy level of 5.9 percent is that 315,000 more Americans dropped out of the labor force last month.

Where did they go? Most of them dropped off unemployment to get on welfare, food stamps or disability. Job categories used to be listed as policeman, fireman, scientist, butcher and baker. Now we should add "government dole." Millions of people get up late, watch Judge Judy and Dr. Phil and get off the couch for the first time all day to open the mail to find their government check. This is the Obama economy. Obama uses the fact that millions of Americans are not working as a reason to lower the unemployment rate.

Where will America get the money to pay for all these welfare, food stamp, disability and Social Security checks for citizens who will never work again? We're already broke. This just adds to the crushing unsustainable $18 trillion debt.

This isn't good news. It's a disaster.

Adding to the misery, the labor force participation rate just dropped to the lowest in 36 years. There are now 92.6 million working-age Americans not working.

This isn't good news. It's a disaster.

Like those late night infomercials say: "But wait. There's more!"

How can 248,000 new jobs be a good thing if average hourly wages are stagnant or dropping? Because they are. That fact was buried in the latest jobs report.

Even the Americans lucky enough to have a job are drowning in quicksand. As Democrat Bill Clinton just admitted, "The average family is making less, adjusted for inflation, than they were the day I left office."

The middle class isn't getting richer, it's getting poorer. Even Clinton understands that under Obama the middle class is struggling to survive and struggling to pay bills -- that's if they still have a job.

This isn't good news. It's a disaster.

The bad news is coming in waves. The media forgot to tell you that inside last week's jobs report was this nugget of reality: The only people being hired are your grandparents; 230,000 of the new jobs went to those in the 55- to 69-year-old age group. In the prime working-age group of 24 to 54 years old, 10,000 jobs were lost.

Holy freaking Batman! What is happening? It means grandma and grandpa are desperate and willing to take grandson's low-wage job to survive until Social Security kicks in. Or perhaps they need to work until the day they die to supplement Social Security. But that's very bad news. The U.S. workforce is now the oldest in history. If grandpa or grandma has to work (out of desperation) until the day he or she dies, there will never be any decent jobs for the grandkids.

This isn't good news. It's a disaster.

But I've saved the two worst bits of news for last. What good is the news of 248,000 new jobs, if they are all part-time or low-wage jobs? Four of the 5 new jobs were in the lowest-quality categories.

Obama is creating a nation of desperate, government-dependent minimum wage workers. If you lose your $100,000 job, get ready to clean toilets, flip burgers, mow lawns or work at The Gap -- because that's all that's available among the new jobs.

That's if there are any jobs at all. I believe the numbers of new jobs are pure fraud, made up out of thin air. Want proof? The government's own JOLT report came out on Tuesday. It says that monthly hiring has plummeted, dropped off a cliff.

It was down 294,000 positions last month. That's the worst drop since 2010 -- and the third worst number since the Lehman Brothers collapse in 2008.

So now I ask you: How could there be good news about jobs created at the same time the government's own report shows a severe halt to hiring? Somebody's cooking the books, folks.

And how come the mainstream media only reports on the fraudulent report showing jobs created but never mentions the other report showing plummeting hiring? Good question. The media is obviously in on the fix. The media has a conflict of interest. The media is big business. The media is owned by billion-dollar companies. Their advertisers are billion-dollar companies. Their own media companies are publicly traded on Wall Street. They are in on the fix. They desperately want you to believe all is well, so their advertisers keep spending and so their stock prices don't plummet. They need to keep the Ponzi scheme going. Can you spell "banana republic?

"Welcome to Obama's America: where up is down, where bad news is reported as good news, where old is the new young (because only old people work anymore), where minimum wage is this president's obsession because minimum wage jobs are the only jobs in the Obama economy, where it's good news that people stop working and join the welfare rolls because they are now more likely to vote Democrat and where, as Nancy Pelosi claims, "Food stamps, unemployment and welfare are the best ways to grow the economy."

Oh, my God! This, folks, is an unmitigated disaster. This, folks, is the murder of the middle class.

And this latest jobs report is pure fraud and fantasy.

I'm Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week for another dose of raw truth. God bless America.





Obamacare Taxes & Subsidies Dictate A "Massive & Disastrous Shift" To Part-Time, Low-Wage Workers By Penalizing Full-Time Workers
There will be 3 major employment disincentives resulting from the benefits Obamacare provides: (1) an explicit tax on full-time work, (2) an implicit tax on full-time work for those who are ineligible for the ACA’s health insurance subsidies, and (3) an implicit tax that links the amount of available subsidies to workers’ incomes. Nearly 1/2 of the U.S. labor force will experience “significant changes,” under Obamacare’s regressive incentives, to work less. “Obmacare may put millions of Americans in a position in which working part time yields more disposable income than working full time. This occurs when the generous assistance to part-time workers for health insurance premiums & out-of-pocket expenses offsets much of the income they forgo by working fewer hours. The lack of this insurance assistance for full-time workers amounts to a tax on full-time work.


Obamacare Taxes & Subsidies Dictate A "Massive & Disastrous Shift" To Part-Time, Low-Wage Workers By Penalizing Full-Time Workers

Study: Obamacare Incentivizes A Massive Shift To Part-Time Working Hours

October 8, 2014 By Ben Bullard — Personal Liberty Digest

Obamacare will erode full-time employment and bolster the ranks of America’s part-time employees, thanks to "implicit" and "explicit" taxes that entice both workers and their employers to follow or avoid the government’s path of least resistance to qualifying for healthcare coverage.

That’s the conclusion of a 47-page study released Tuesday by the Mercatus Center at George Mason University, a nonprofit that researches and advocates for free-market policy.

Titled "The Affordable Care Act and the New Economics of Part-Time Work," the study identifies several Obamacare features likely to drive a fundamental shift in labor demographics, as more people and businesses begin complying with the law:

"Starting this year, the United States’ working population will face three major employment disincentives resulting from the very benefits the Affordable Care Act (ACA) provides: (1) an explicit tax on full-time work, (2) an implicit tax on full-time work for those who are ineligible for the ACA’s health insurance subsidies, and (3) an implicit tax that links the amount of available subsidies to workers’ incomes.

"The ACA’s overall impact on employment… will arguably be larger than that of any single piece of legislation since World War II," the authors assert. Mercatus expects nearly half of the U.S. labor force to experience "significant changes," under Obamacare’s regressive incentives, to work less.

"The ACA may put millions of Americans in a position in which working part time yields more disposable income than working full time," the summary states. "This occurs when the ACA’s generous assistance to part-time workers for health insurance premiums and out-of-pocket expenses offsets much of the income they forgo by working fewer hours. The lack of this insurance assistance for full-time workers amounts to a tax on full-time work."

In addition, the study forecasts a twofold increase over previously reported estimates of how dramatically Obamacare will affect U.S. productivity in terms of total hours worked.

"This analysis, combined with lessons from labor market history, leads to an estimate that the ACA will reduce employment and aggregate hours by slightly more than 3 percent, or about 4 million full-time-equivalent workers," the authors predict.

"This is nearly double the contraction indicated in prior studies, mainly because some previous work underestimated the size of the ACA’s employer penalty and did not consider the full range of tax effects."

The full results of the Mercatus Center study can be viewed here. A synopsis of its findings is here.





Will Obama Use The Ebola Scare To Exercise The Government’s Presumed Authority “For The Greater Good” To Manipulate And Delay The November National Election?
Curious timing, this announcement that the U.S. now has Ebola patient No. 1. five weeks before a national election. And with perhaps thousands upon thousands being isolated; well, what about the Nov. 4 election? And is it not just a little curious that the government ordered 160,000 hazmat suits in response to a disease that is said not to be airborne? And is it not just a little curious that a large government supplier of emergency response products specializing in “high risk events” said in a public tweet that Disaster Assistance Response Teams were told weeks or months ago to prepare to be activated in the month of October? The government has assumed the authority to lock down and/or quarantine areas at will. Don’t think it won’t exercise that presumed authority “for the greater good.”


Will Obama Use The Ebola Scare To Exercise The Government’s Presumed Authority “For The Greater Good” To Manipulate And Delay The November National Election?

Is Ebola Obama’s October Surprise?

October 3, 2014 By Bob Livingston — Personal Liberty Digest

Curious timing, this announcement that the U.S. now has Ebola patient No. 1.

Five weeks before a national election.

First case in Texas, where President Barack Obama’s de facto amnesty policy for illegals allowed for an influx of tens of thousands of immunity-compromised, disease-carrying, individuals from the Central American backwaters. People rife for "catching" the Ebola virus.

The first patient, Thomas E. Duncan, was allowed to travel freely into the U.S. from Liberia, despite, as we have learned, having hand-carried a convulsing 19-year-old woman to an Ebola clinic in Monrovia — a woman who died from the disease the next day. And despite being told two times that Duncan had been to Liberia, hospital workers sent him home with antibiotics. Home to a residence with three children. Children who then went to school.

But it’s worse. Much worse. Duncan traveled through Dulles International Airport, where he had a layover of nearly three hours, and then to Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport.

We were initially told that 12 to 18 people — now including a total of five children who went to four different schools — had come into contact with Duncan after he had become symptomatic. By the next day, that list had expanded to a total of 80 to 100. Those initial contacts are being isolated for 21 days.

"It’s a constant process of interviews and locating as many contacts as are out there," Dallas County health official Erikka Neroes said. "We expect daily that there could be more people added." Others could fall off the list as time passes and they show no symptoms. "It’s constantly evolving," she said.

Those initial contacts are being isolated for 21 days, the purported incubation period for the disease. Twenty-one days, and as another case pops up, those concentric circles grow until you have more being isolated for 21 days and more being isolated for 21 days…

And with hundreds upon hundreds and perhaps thousands upon thousands being isolated; well, what about the Nov. 4 election?

And is it not just a little curious that the government ordered 160,000 hazmat suits in response to a disease that is said not to be airborne? And is it not just a little curious that a large government supplier of emergency response products specializing in "high risk events" said in a public tweet that Disaster Assistance Response Teams were told weeks ago to prepare to be activated in the month of October?

"What we are now hearing is just the tip of the iceburg as we enter October," noted the company’s Twitter spokesperson. "Ebola virus will cripple EMS and hospitals."

The government has assumed the authority to lock down and/or quarantine areas at will. Don’t think it won’t exercise that presumed authority "for the greater good."

The fear hysteria will also lead to a public outcry for a vaccine. It’s a vaccine U.S. drug manufacturers hold the patent on. Millions of willing medical slaves ripe for the picking.

The masters in the dark rooms of the pharmas know exactly how to conjure up mass fear hysteria so that the people clamor for vaccinations. So we have another multibillion-dollar hoax — like the great swine flu "pandemic" — to bring in a demand for more vaccinations. Vaccinations that are worthless for people’s health but that further enrich Big Pharma.

Now comes the great Ebola epidemic. Obama’s October surprise.

Here’s how you prepare for and avoid Ebola and any other disease. Load up on vitamin D3. The key to avoiding disease is immunity and the key to strong immunity is vitamin D3. The power of immunization protection comes from within. It is a healthy internal environment that protects the individual and the population.





New Damning Evidence Of Obama’s Contempt For America And Its Safety & Security: Obama has attended less than half of his daily intelligence briefings since taking office
A new report out from the Government Accountability Institute reveals why the president doesn’t seem to know what’s going on: He has attended less than half of his daily intelligence briefings since taking office. First Term:. Obama had a 42.43% attendance rate for intelligence briefings. Second Term: Obama had a 41.26% attendance rate for intelligence briefings. The process of quizzing intelligence officials on matters of national security and global threats in intelligence briefings “cannot be replicated on paper” by Obama just reading the reports. On Obama’s attempt to blame intelligence officials for the mess in the Middle East, a senior Pentagon official summed the president’s claims up thusly: “Either the president doesn’t read the intelligence he’s getting or he’s bullshitting.”


New Damning Evidence Of Obama’s Contempt For America And Its Safety & Security: Obama has attended less than half of his daily intelligence briefings since taking office.

No Wonder He’s Clueless: Obama Has Attended Less Than Half Of Daily Intelligence Briefings

September 30, 2014 By Sam Rolley — Personal Liberty Digest

President Barack Obama blamed intelligence community failures for his foreign policy ineptitude in a "60 Minutes" interview Sunday. But a new report out from the Government Accountability Institute (GAI) reveals another explanation for why the president doesn’t seem to know what’s going on: He has attended less than half of his daily intelligence briefings since taking office.

"I think our head of the intelligence community, Jim Clapper, has acknowledged that I think they underestimated what had been taking place in Syria," Obama passed the buck on Monday.

In a study of Obama’s first 2,079 days in office, running from Jan. 20, 2009 through Sept. 29, 2014, compiled from the White House calendar and information gathered from POLITICO, GAI found that the president attended a total of 875 intelligence briefings over the course of 2,079 days in office.

That means Obama has attended only 42.09 percent of his Presidential Daily Briefs.

GAI also compared the president’s briefing attendance during his first and second terms:

First Term: President Obama was inaugurated on January 20, 2009 and was re-elected in November 2012. Between January 20, 2009 and January 19, 2013, President Obama attended 620 PDBs over a possible 1,461 days for a 42.43% attendance rate.

Second Term: President Obama was inaugurated for his second term on January 20, 2013. Between January 20, 2013 and September 29, 2014, President Obama attended 255 PDBs over a possible 618 days for a 41.26% attendance rate.

This isn’t the first time Obama’s intelligence briefing attendance has come under fire. In 2012, GAI reported that the president preferred to receive written versions of intelligence briefs over having face-to-face meetings with intelligence officials.

At the time, former White House press secretary Jay Carney laughed off questions about Obama’s attendance at the crucial daily meetings.

"He gets it every day, OK? The president of the United States gets the presidential daily briefing every day," Carney said. "There is a document that he reads every day when he is not — well, he always reads it every day because he’s a voracious consumer of all of his briefing materials."

But as the American Enterprise Institute’s Mark Thiessen pointed out in September 2012 (and Obama’s foreign policy aloofness has since proven), the process of quizzing intelligence officials on matters of national security and global threats "cannot be replicated on paper."

In a recent Daily Beast piece about Obama’s attempt to blame intelligence officials for the mess in the Middle East, a senior Pentagon official summed the president’s claims up thusly: "Either the president doesn’t read the intelligence he’s getting or he’s bullshitting."





Obama’s Bombing Campaign Is Not About A War On Terror and ISIS: It is about risking World War III with Russia, on behalf of Saudi Arabia and globalists, by cutting the legs from under Vladimir Putin
This battle has nothing to do with fighting terrorism and ISIS; it is to ensure Saudi Arabia’s regional dominance and open a natural gas pipeline that will ultimately supply gas to Eastern Europe, which currently gets most of its natural gas from Russia. This pipeline will cut off Vladimir Putin’s trump card in his conflict with the West. This battle is to provide Qatar with a means to natural gas profits and to cut the legs from under Putin and destroy one of his last remaining allies in the region. Putin’s not likely to take such a threat lying down, so Obama is risking World War III on behalf of Saudi Arabia and globalists with interests in the Qatar gas line. Once again the American people will lose blood and treasure and be further impoverished by a war paid for with more money printing


Obama’s Bombing Campaign Is Not About A War On Terror and ISIS: It is about risking World War III with Russia, on behalf of Saudi Arabia and globalists, by cutting the legs from under Vladimir Putin

Assad Is The Target; ISIS Is The Excuse

September 24, 2014 By Bob Livingston — Personal Liberty Digest

The ultimate target of the new American bombing campaign is the regime of Bashar Assad. Attacking ISIS and the newly minted enemy du jour, the Korashans, is just an excuse.

The Wall Street Journal laid bare the backstage machinations required to get the Saudi Arabian kingdom — one of the principal backers of ISIS — on board.

Folks, the U.S. is not fighting a "war on terror." It is fighting a war to ensure Saudi Arabia’s dominance in the region and to open the way for a natural gas pipeline from the South Pars/North Dome Gas-Condensate field in Qatar to Turkey and then Eastern Europe. The American people have been lied to once again. And once again, the American people have fallen for it hook, line and sinker.

The New York Times reported Sept. 18 that the U.S. is paying "salaries to thousands of ‘vetted’ rebels and has given them ammunition to boost their battlefield mettle." These rebels, according to The Times, hate ISIS, but their priority remains ousting Assad.

As for the Saudi involvement, "Syria had become a critical frontline in the battle for regional influence with Iran, an Assad ally. As Mr. Assad stepped up his domestic crackdown [on the opposition forces], the king decided to do whatever was needed to bring the Syrian leader down, Arab diplomats say," according to The WSJ.

"In the last week of August, a U.S. military and State Department delegation flew to Riyadh to lay the ground for a military program to train the moderate Syrian opposition to fight both the Assad regime and Islamic State — something the Saudis have long requested. The U.S. team wanted permission to use Saudi facilities for the training. Top Saudi ministers, after consulting overnight with the king, agreed and offered to foot much of the bill," The WSJ reports.

In other words, the Saudis wanted the U.S. to train and equip the forces fighting Assad. The U.S. wanted Saudi Arabia to join a coalition against ISIS to give its attacks on ISIS "international legitimacy," and the U.S. military needed a base in Saudi Arabia to train opposition fighters. The Saudis agreed to supply the base and some fighter jets in exchange for a promise to equip the anti-Assad rebels.

In addition to stripping Iran of a key ally, taking out Assad will open a way for the coveted gas pipeline across Syria — a pipeline Assad opposed. That pipeline will ultimately supply gas to Eastern Europe, which currently gets most of its natural gas from Russia. That pipeline will cut off Vladimir Putin’s trump card in his conflict with the West.

So the U.S. trumped up an ISIS threat, pulled the Korashans out of their old playbook, polished them up to make them appear new, put a shiny cover on an old plan to use clothing as a terror weapon (remember the underwear bomber), and used them as the excuse to begin the campaign to bring down Assad.

This battle has nothing to do with fighting terrorism, and ISIS poses no threat to the U.S. This is a battle ensure Saudi Arabia’s regional dominance — a Saudi Arabia that purports to be an ally of America but which played a key role in the 9/11 attacks and has been funding the very terrorists the regime is using to terrorize Americans into supporting this new war. This battle is to provide Qatar with a means to natural gas profits and to cut the legs from under Putin and destroy one of his last remaining allies in the region.

Putin’s not likely to take such a threat lying down, so the "peace president" is risking World War III on behalf of Saudi Arabia and globalists with interests in the Qatar gas line.

But regardless, once again, the globalists will win and the American people will lose blood and treasure and be further impoverished by a war paid for with more money printing.





Does The GOP Have The Brains And Courage To Use This Immigration Message As A Golden Opportunity To Win A Historic Landslide In The November Elections?
The GOP message should be: BET (bankruptcy, Ebola and terrorism). These three disasters, pouring across our Southern border, are the three biggest threats to America’s future. An unsecured border is open to invasion by ISIS & al-Qaida terror cells. With our economy in such a weak state, any terrorist attack on U.S. soil would be catastrophic to the economy. The economy would plunge into depression. The same holds true for an Ebola pandemic. If illegal immigrants cross the border with Ebola, it will quickly spread and cause a pandemic. That would shut down commerce from coast to coast, as consumers stay home from shopping malls, theaters & restaurants. Economic collapse would ensue. Here is a short, simple, three-step plan to deal with illegal immigration. If only the GOP had the brains & courage to present this plan.


Does The GOP Have The Brains And Courage To Use This Immigration Message As A Golden Opportunity To Win A Historic Landslide In The November Elections?

The Immigration Message That Leads To A GOP Landslide

September 25, 2014 BY Wayne Allyn Root — Personal Liberty Digest

Watch the video here —http://personalliberty.com/immigration-message-leads-gop-landslide/ — or read the text of it below:

Hi I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. The GOP has a golden opportunity for a historic landslide in November, taking control of the Senate and expanding control of the House. But they must stay on message. There is no bigger winning issue than illegal immigration and our unsecured border.

America’s Southern border is being invaded — but not just by poor, desperate, government-dependent illegal aliens who will bankrupt America’s middle class with their need for welfare, food stamps, housing, education, prison costs and free healthcare. The border issue has escalated far beyond that! It’s now a life-and-death issue.

Let’s call it BET (bankruptcy, Ebola and terrorism). These three disasters, pouring across our Southern border, are the three biggest threats to America’s future. They all intersect at the border. Our children’s future is on the line. BET is the winning message the GOP must ensure America’s voters hear.

An unsecured border is open to invasion by ISIS and al-Qaida terror cells. With our economy in such a weak state, any terrorist attack on U.S. soil would be catastrophic to the economy. The economy would plunge into depression.

The same holds true for an Ebola pandemic. If illegal immigrants cross the border with Ebola, it will quickly spread and cause a pandemic. That would shut down commerce from coast to coast, as consumers stay home from shopping malls, theaters and restaurants. Economic collapse would ensue.

The GOP message should be: "BET (bankruptcy, Ebola and terrorism). Obama is gambling with your children’s life by leaving the border wide open. That’s a bet the GOP is not willing to take — for you, for your children or for our nation."

That’s a winning message — if it’s backed up by a detailed plan. Blame alone is not enough. The GOP must provide solutions. Here is a short, simple, three-step plan to deal with illegal immigration. If only the GOP had the brains and courage to present this plan.

Step 1: Demand we secure the border before anything else gets done. There is no negotiation. Period. Barack Obama has lost the immigration issue. While they won’t admit it, Obama and his socialist cabal want millions of additional illegal immigrants to keep crossing the border simply because they see them as millions of poor, dependent, future Democrat voters. Of course, they can’t admit that, so they distract voters by claiming a border wall is too expensive and can’t work.

This is 2014. We don’t need to build a real wall. We can build a virtual wall with high-tech surveillance: drones and cameras. No one can cross a border protected by thousands of drones with border patrol or National Guard positioned to swoop in the moment anyone reaches the border.

Obama has already created a Soviet-style surveillance state that snoops on its own law-abiding citizens. He directs the NSA to listen to all our communications without a warrant and tells the IRS to intimidate his political opponents. He wants our skies filled with drones. But when it comes to protecting our border, he conveniently forgets how to use the same high-tech tools. Drones and cameras can create an impenetrable virtual wall, quickly, and at a reasonable cost.

Step 2: After the border with Mexico is secured by a virtual wall, and only after, let’s give illegal immigrants who are already here a path to become permanent legal residents (over a long period of time, meeting certain strict conditions), but never citizens.

They’ve broken the law. They’ve given up the right to become citizens (and, therefore, the right to vote). Millions apply to become legal citizens. Most wait a lifetime and never get in. So the compromise is that those immigrants already here get to stay. They never have to fear that knock on the door in the middle of the night ever again. They are free to work. They are not threatened with jail or deportation. They can sleep soundly at night.

What a gift. But they can never be citizens and they can never vote. Period. They gave up that privilege when they broke the law. But in return, the border is sealed forever. No other illegal immigrants will ever get in.

Step 3: The GOP is sadly disconnected from its own voters. Conservatives welcome immigrants who want to work and contribute (like the rest of us) to America. Unfortunately, immigration reform never differentiates between those who come here to work and those who don’t. That must change.

No entitlements, no welfare, no food stamps, no free healthcare, must be a key requirement. Ever. That’s the agreement. You can become a legal resident, but only if you came here to work, not to collect handouts. That’s the key question we should be asking before we let anyone into America.

America is generous. But it’s time to stop being stupid. We’ll let you in, but only if you’re here to work. We won’t let you in, if you’re here to mooch off us.

You can bet 90 percent of illegals would love this opportunity. This is the gift of a lifetime to work and create a better life for themselves and their children, while sleeping soundly without fear of deportation. Of course, 99 percent of Democratic politicians will oppose it because they don’t really care about helping immigrants; they only care about more Democratic voters.

"BET (bankruptcy, Ebola and terrorism)" and the gamble Obama is taking with your children’s life by leaving our southern border wide open — should be the GOP immigration message to ensure a landslide victory in November. But the question remains: Does the GOP have the brains, courage or cajones to take this winning BET?

I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. God bless America.





Obama Should Be Impeached For Aiding And Abetting Arab Petro-Terrorists: "Muslims Like Obama" Spend Hundreds Of Billions Of Dollars Fighting For The Future Of Arab Oil
What we are doing in the Middle East isn’t working. In fact, things are only getting worse. Why continue this terrible course and be good loyal subjects to Saudi Arabia, while Muslims like Obama spend hundreds of billions of dollars fighting for the future of Arab oil? Let’s leave the Middle East to the Arabs. Let’s be prepared to pay the extra buck a gallon for gasoline at least for a couple of years. Let’s keep our kids out of harm’s way. Let’s become energy-independent and, along the way, create hundreds of thousands of new jobs for Americans. Let Islam murder itself, if it so chooses. And if that means Israel has to stand on its own two feet for the first time in seven decades, that’s too bad. It is time for the USA to stand up for what is right for the USA. It is time for Obama to quit acting like some Saudi servant


Obama Should Be Impeached For Aiding And Abetting Arab Petro-Terrorists: “Muslims Like Obama” Spend Hundreds Of Billions Of Dollars Fighting For The Future Of Arab Oil

Obama Should Be Impeached For Aiding And Abetting Arab Petro-Terrorists

September 17, 2014 by John Myers — Personal Liberty Digest 

"[T]he White House’s default position is to double down on the status quo… looking the other way while the regime terrorizes Saudi Arabian citizens, backs reactionary forces in Egypt and Bahrain, and abets violence in Syria. And, of course, avaricious arms merchants, with support from the Pentagon, continue to sell Riyadh billions of dollars in weapons." — Middle East Research and Information Project, March 27 

It rarely makes the news when Saudi Arabia, one of America’s closest allies, beheads nonviolent criminals. Yet in a recent PBS interview, Bill Maher quoted a New York Times story, saying 19 beheadings have occurred in the kingdom since the news broke that the Islamic State (aka ISIS or ISIL) had begun beheading Westerners.

Only when ISIS acts brutally do we notice that centuries-old Islamic laws are barbaric and inhuman, condoning acts so vile that Vice President Joe Biden said the U.S. would pursue ISIS "to the gates of Hell."

On Sept. 2, Al-Jazeera reported that there has been a spike in the number of people losing their heads in Saudi Arabia:

The Saudi Ministry of Justice has announced the execution of 26 individuals since August 4. In the seven months prior, 15 executions were carried out, bringing the total number to 41 so far this year. However, there were no executions during the Islamic holy month of Ramadan this year between June 28 and July 28.

"One theory behind the increase is that there is a backlog of cases [since the start of the year]," said Adam Coogle, a representative of New York-based Human Rights Watch.

According Sevag Kechichian, a researcher with London-based Amnesty International, the rate of executions in the first half of last year was high, before slowing down, while this year the reverse is true. One way of explaining this, Kechichian said, is that Saudi authorities may be trying to reach an annual target: at 79, the number of announced executions in 2012 and 2013 was identical.

I suspect it is necessary to keep up appearances. And let’s face it: When a country has the largest of the low-cost oil reserves in the world (drilled and delivered for less than $5 per barrel), with proven pools of 267 billion barrels of sweet crude, what happens in Mecca is nobody’s business.

That is why ISIS, with only a fraction of the amount of Saudi oil reserves, can still be opposed for the outrage of the documented beheading of 1/25th as many people as King Abdullah decapitates every year.

That could all change, however, as Saudi Arabia and its giant pools of oil are being surrounded by the ISIS army bent on global petroleum domination.

Our president was "heartbroken" over U.S. journalist James Foley’s execution and said it was hard for him to hold back tears while speaking with Foley’s family. The president did have the gumption to go golfing that same day. I suspect Barack Obama was contemplative during his golf game, but not over a dead American. After all, he himself has ordered such executions of Americans with drone attacks. I suspect his concern was with the situation facing Saudi Arabia, a desert ruled by Bedouin beheaders.

Yet Saudi Arabia is the only country that in an emergency can pump 12 million barrels per day, which not only caps oil prices below $100 per barrel but prevents an explosion of inflation that could destroy all that Obama has worked for.

So Obama doubles down again and again on the corrupt, cruel and terrorist money-changers that are the House of Saud. It is Abdullah who pays off potential enemies the way Attila the Hun did.

Don’t take my word for it. An Aug. 30, Global Research ran this headline: "Why Does the U.S. Support Saudi Arabia, A Country Which Hosts and Finances Islamic Terrorism? On Behalf of Washington?" The article carried these subheads: "America Has Sold Its Soul for Oil" and "Why Does the U.S. Support a Country which was FOUNDED With Terrorism."

Yet some people in Washington will support Saudi Arabia even if the leadership of that nation planned — or at least had beforehand knowledge of — the 9/11 attacks. Charges have been made that the Obama administration doesn’t want to know the truth — the ugly truth that Saudi Arabia, if not overtly helping ISIS, is being encircled by them.

It could be that Saudi oil is the real dirty oil in the world — not domestic U.S. drilling and not Canadian oil sands.

North and South American oil may cost more to deliver to the gas station. But as you can see from the chart below, there is plenty of available oil in the Western Hemisphere to meet our needs, which will release us from this Arab fratricide.

Because much of Venezuela and Canadian oil sands don’t pool and because American oil no longer bubbles to the surface as it did a century ago, it may for a time cost $1 a gallon more not to buy Arab oil.

Some ducks no doubt will die in oil sands collection pools and some washed-up stars like Neil Young and Daryl Hannah will be outraged at domestic drilling and the harm that may come to a caribou herd. But isn’t it worth a try? What we are doing in the Middle East isn’t working. In fact, things in that region of the world are only getting worse. So we can continue this terrible course and be good loyal subjects to Saudi Arabia, while Muslims like Obama spend hundreds of billions of dollars fighting for the future of Arab oil.

I say let’s leave the Middle East to the Arabs. Let’s be prepared to pay the extra buck a gallon for gasoline at least for a couple of years. Let’s keep our kids out of harm’s way. Let’s become energy-independent and, along the way, create hundreds of thousands of new jobs for Americans. Let Islam murder itself, if it so chooses. And if that means Israel has to stand on its own two feet for the first time in seven decades, that’s too bad.

It is time for the United States to stand up for what is right for the United States. It is time for the president of the United States to act presidential and not like some Saudi servant.

Yours in good times and bad,

–John Myers





I Am An Islamophobe Because I Am A Realist — Not Because I Am A Racist
I have learned that in the Middle East, the bosom of Islam (that peace-loving religion), all you have to do is wear a crucifix around your neck to be arrested. And God help you if you are a woman because Allah sure as hell won’t help you. As a woman, you cannot in many Mideast countries be on the street without a male relative, you cannot drive a car or ride a bicycle, and you damn well better have enough clothes on or the roaming bands of religious police will put you under arrest. If you happen to be gay, that’s a death sentence. Still, the bleeding-heart liberals lecture us on how we should not judge Islam. I’ve got news for you liberals, if we don’t deal with Islam now, they will deal with us the way the Nazis dealt with the Jews. Apologists proclaim that ISIS is an evil group but is not a reflection of Islamic religion. The truth is that Islam is both a religion and a dangerous ideology bent on world domination.


I Am An Islamophobe Because I Am A Realist — Not Because I Am A Racist

I Am An Islamophobe Because I Am A Realist — Not Because I Am A Racist

September 10, 2014 by John Myers — Personal Liberty Digest 

I grow furious as ever more apologists speak to the popular media to proclaim that the Islamic State (aka ISIS or ISIL) is an evil group but is in no way a reflection of the loving, peaceful religion that is Islam. It is time to wake up to the truth that Islam is both a religion and a dangerous ideology bent on world domination.

Not so, said the current president and his two predecessors:

• In 1994, Bill Clinton said: "[Americans know] the traditional values of Islam, devotion to faith and good works, to family and society, are in harmony with the best of American ideals."

• In 2002, George W. Bush said: "Here in the United States our Muslim citizens are making many contributions in business, science and law, medicine and education, and in other fields… [they are] upholding our nation’s ideals of liberty and justice in a world at peace." And he said: "[Islam] inspires countless individuals to lead lives of honesty, integrity, and morality."

• In 2009, Barack Obama said: "Islam has always been a part of America’s story… and since our founding, American Muslims have enriched the United States." He also said: "Islam has demonstrated through words and deeds the possibilities of religious tolerance and racial equality."

The truth is, Mr. Bush, we can do a head count of Muslims who live with honesty, integrity and morality. And through polling we can also approximate how many Muslims around the world are driven to lie, deceive and even murder infidels (in other words, us).

Last month, Personal Liberty reported:

"According to the results of a recent poll, support for the terror group is likely on the rise throughout the Western world. The poll, conducted on behalf of the Russian news agency Rossiya Segodnya by ICM, found that among people in Great Britain, France and Germany 2 percent say they have a favorable view of Islamic State and 7 percent say they have a somewhat favorable view of the group. In France, which has a large Muslim population, 16 percent of those surveyed say they support ISIS; among people age 18-24 in the country the number jumps to 27 percent."

In a report about the poll, Vox’s Max Fisher wrote:

"This is alarming, in part because a growing number of Europeans, often from predominantly Muslim immigrant communities, are not just expressing their support for ISIS in polls: they are traveling to Syria and Iraq to join up. The ISIS fighter who killed American journalist James Foley on video last week spoke with a strong London accent. European governments are rightly worried about the implications of this for their own national security."

It is time for our leaders to wake up to the fact that there is a large segment of Islam that is a threat to our national security and that, therefore, it is time to stop pandering to this so-called "religion of peace."

After all, ISIS may be a small band of bloodthirsty murderers, but they are just one radical group that falls under the religious roof taught in mosques around the world. And as these groups kill and maim their way across the Middle East with ambitions against Americans, few Muslims will openly criticize their religious brethren. In fact, tens of millions of Muslims are in favor of killing infidels and dream of a future where Sharia law rules the world.

Yet our government seems to feel if we apologize enough, give in enough and are humble enough, Muslims will suddenly act like Buddhists and make friends with us Jews and Christians. Even the Washington neocons — the very ones who constantly proclaim that British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain was the seed that grew to become Adolf Hitler — cannot appease Muslims fast enough or thoroughly enough. I have bad news for these sheep in wolf’s clothing: ISIS is not a few bad apples that turned to terror. ISIS is part and parcel of Islam, an ideology more than a religion, and ISIS is casting a very dark shadow on freedom and liberty.

It seems to me the entire leadership in the West either wants to pacify Islam or is afraid to speak the truth. But avoiding the truth and the true goals of so many millions will not make this threat go away. America has to identify who the real enemy is. That means accepting that both the perpetrators of 9/11 and the terrorists who recently beheaded American journalists are indoctrinated by one religion, and it sure as heck isn’t Mormonism.

I Was ‘Caught Red-Handed’ By Two Mormons

Last year, I was walking home with a bottle of Merlot tucked under my arm, and I came across two young men dressed smartly in dark suits, wearing crisp white shirts and conservative neckties. Clearly, the two were on a mission for the Mormon Church. In high school and college, I had a lot of Mormon and Jewish friends and was even invited to their homes for dinner on occasion. I have to admit that I liked the Jewish faith best because they wouldn’t let me join and I often feel as Groucho Marx once said, "I wouldn’t want to join any club that would have me as a member."

But I always enjoyed my Mormon friends — at least when it came to playing basketball, since there was no drinking beer together on Friday nights.

I talked to these two polite young men who did seem to care about my salvation, and we had a fun exchange. I told them I thought I was a bit too far gone, but would give them time to make their pitch if I had equal rebuttal time. We had a chuckle and went on our way.

I don’t get that warm and fuzzy feeling when I pass Muslims, which I do quite frequently in the city where I live. Maybe it is just me being silly; but, then again, dozens of jihadists from Calgary have left Canada and gone to join ISIS. In fact two Calgary brothers, Collin and Gregory Gordon, who two years ago lived a couple of miles from my home, were killed last month in Syria fighting for ISIS.

The National Post reported: "Collin Gordon was once an accomplished volleyball player, a sports fanatic and music enthusiast. His Twitter posts painted a picture of a fun-loving but thoughtful young man who loved basketball, electronic music and weekends."

Last month, following the video broadcast beheading of American journalist James Foley, Collin Gordon tweeted, "10/10. The video of James Foley losing his neck is the perfection of ‘Terrorism.’"

Now I am going to jump to a conclusion: The two young Mormon men I met the other day are not going to go out and murder and celebrate beheadings because of something written in The Book of Mormon. I make the same prediction for Jews and Christians and their holy texts.

I can already hear the few bad apples retort from the progressives reading this. What I want to know is why those apples are showing up only in Islamic barrels.

Liberals Ignore Their Hypocrisy When It Comes To Islam

My wife and I have a daughter-in-law who is Lebanese and who has been shunned by the traditional Muslim elements of her family for committing the sin of falling in love with our American infidel son. Another of our children lived and worked in the Middle East. I was afraid to say too much about Islam in case they would suffer the consequences.

I have learned that in the Middle East, the bosom of Islam (that peace-loving religion), all you have to do is wear a crucifix around your neck to be arrested. And God help you if you are a woman because Allah sure as hell won’t help you. As a woman, you cannot in many Mideast countries be on the street without a male relative, you cannot drive a car or ride a bicycle, and you damn well better have enough clothes on or the roaming bands of religious police will put you under arrest. If you happen to be gay, that’s a death sentence.

Still, the bleeding-heart liberals lecture us on how we should not judge Islam. I’ve got news for you liberals, if we don’t deal with Islam now, they will deal with us the way the Nazis dealt with the Jews. Of course, you could always call-up the ACLU; but if Sharia law ever takes hold, there will be no ACLU.

I like to think I am fearless when it comes to writing what I believe, but even I am afraid to write too strongly about what I really think of Islam — not because somebody will hurt me. To hell with that, come and get me. But I fear repercussions on my publisher and my family. But frankly, as I am on the downside to 60, I don’t like to have to watch every word that I write in the off chance of retribution.

As for you progressives, I expect lots of messages. Yuck it up now. You have that right. But if Islam ever achieves its global goal of world domination, free speech will be something your children and grandchildren will not have; and you will have contributed to that end.

Yours in good times and bad,

–John Myers





These 9/11 Questions Remain Unanswered
Can you address the questions in the above article and still undoubtedly believe that what we were told about 9/11 is the truth? Additional questions: Did a pending SEC investigation into top government officials have anything to do with the destruction of WTC Building 7 that contained vital information for that investigation? No airplane flew into that building. Why did all three buildings have traces of thermite explosive around the remains of their steel support columns? Burning jet fuel does not reach a temperature high enough to liquefy steel support columns and all three buildings pancaked down identically as if in controlled explosive demolitions. Was the Pentagon a target because it contained information that needed to be destroyed concerning trillions of dollars of missing government money? The plane just happened to hit the Pentagon in the very area where that information was secured.


These 9/11 Questions Remain Unanswered

These 9/11 Questions Remain Unanswered

September 11, 2014 by Bob Livingston — Personal Liberty Digest

Three years ago, on the 10th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, I posed a series of questions about the official narrative that to this day remain unanswered — and largely unasked — by the propaganda media and the elites walking the halls of power.

Here they are:

• In the months leading up to 9/11, the United States’ vaunted intelligence agencies lost track of 19 foreigners, most of whom had overstayed their visas, and could not catch up to them even though some of them were living with FBI informants and others were enrolling in flight schools where they sought to learn to fly — but not land — airplanes. They were living the high life and not showing any evidence of trying to hide. In July 2001, according to an article in Germany’s daily Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, U.S. and Israeli intelligence agencies received warning signals through the Echelon spy network that Middle Eastern terrorists were planning to hijack commercial aircraft to use as weapons against important symbols of American and Israeli culture. Yet we are told the attacks came as a complete surprise. How could this happen?

• Papers released by WikiLeaks indicate that in the weeks before 9/11, American intelligence services were on the trail of another group of five men with terrorist ties who were staying in California. They slipped away in the days after 9/11. Were they a fifth team of hijackers who did not complete their mission for some reason? How were they able to escape the massive U.S. dragnet?

• Two days before the 9/11 attacks, the "Lion of Panjshir," Ahmad Shah Massoud Khayin, who was the leader of the Northern Alliance in Afghanistan, was assassinated by two suicide bombers posing as journalists. In the early morning hours of Sept. 11, a van occupied by Middle Eastern men pulled up to The Colony Beach and Tennis Resort in Florida, where President George W. Bush was staying. They said they were there to interview the president, but didn’t have an appointment. They were turned away. Are these two incidents related?

• Two hours before the planes slammed into the Twin Towers, two employees of the Israeli instant messaging service Odigo received messages warning of the coming attacks, according to the Israeli publication Haaretz. Who sent the messages and why? Who else was warned ahead of the attacks?

• At 8:44 a.m., during a working breakfast on missile defense with Congressional leaders, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld predicted a terrorist attack would come, saying, "Let me tell you. I’ve been around the block a few times. There will be another event." Did he know about the attack in advance?

• How did that passport of Satam al-Suqami survive the crash? The plane was exploded into a giant fireball upon impact with WTC 1. Yet the passport exited his pocket or luggage and fell unharmed to the ground near the tower, where it was spotted by a passerby and turned over to police despite the bedlam going on all around? How is it that his was the only identification found out of all the passengers on the plane?

• At 8:50 a.m., four minutes after the first plane struck, CIA head George Tenet was made aware of the crash and realized it was no accident. Yet there is no indication he made an effort to stop Bush from making a scheduled appearance at Booker Elementary School in Florida, despite the danger he may have been facing were a highly coordinated attack being carried out. Before entering the classroom, Bush paused to speak with then-National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice. Later, Bush said he learned of the first crash before entering the classroom when he saw the plane crash into the building on television. There was no video of the first crash until much later in the day, and the school principal said there was no television in the area that Bush could have seen anyway. Why this discrepancy? Was Bush lying?

• According to media reports, a number of the passengers on the hijacked airliners supposedly used cellphones to call loved ones and authorities. But cellphone technology in 2001 didn’t allow the use of phones above 10,000 feet. How were the calls possible?

• Witnesses reported seeing a white jet that looked like a fighter plane trailing United Airlines Flight 93, and a sonic boom was reported in the area over Pennsylvania. Was there a second plane? If so, where did it come from?

• Some witnesses also reported seeing Flight 93 on fire before it crashed into the field. Why were these witnesses hushed up and why weren’t they allowed to testify for the 9/11 Commission? What was the plane they saw and did it shoot down Flight 93 upon orders from Vice President Dick Cheney?

• If the plane flew into the ground intact, how did a large portion of the engine fall more than a mile away from the crash site? How did lighter debris wind up as far as eight miles away?

• In the days following the attacks, at least 60 Israeli citizens were arrested and held secretly — some of them with ties to Israeli military and intelligence. Fox News’ Carl Cameron was the first mainstream reporter to break the news. It was weeks later before other mainstream news outlets picked up on it. His four-part series that provided evidence that the Israelis had foreknowledge of the 9/11 attacks has been scrubbed from Fox News. Who were these Israelis, what did they know and what became of them? Why did Fox News scrub the stories?

• The North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) is tasked with protecting American airspace. Yet even though the Federal Aviation Administration notified NORAD of the hijacking of American Airlines Flight 11 at 8:38 a.m. and other flights in the minutes that followed, it wasn’t until long after the last plane hit the ground that NORAD planes showed up. Where were they and why did NORAD sit on news of the hijacked planes for several minutes (which NORAD admits to but won’t explain) before scrambling any fighters?

• When the 9/11 Commission tried to get answers to these questions, NORAD stonewalled and its representatives lied. What were they covering up and why? Why do they continue to stonewall to this day?

• Firefighters and reporters arriving on the scene of the WTC fires claim to have heard numerous explosions before the buildings collapsed. What caused the explosions? Were they deliberately set to bring down the Twin Towers?

• How did fires cause two skyscrapers to fall? It’s the first time fire ever brought down a skyscraper, and it happened to three buildings in one day. Why did they pancake down as if in a controlled demolition? If fire weakened the support beams, as the official stories suggest, why didn’t the towers fall to one side or the other, rather than pancake down as if in a controlled event? Many engineers and architects at AE911Truth.org say it could not have happened as we’re told. Why are they being ignored? Better yet, if these architects and engineers are lying about their theories, ask yourself what they stand to gain from lying and what is their motive.

• Traces of an explosive called thermite were found in the rubble of the WTC, and melted steel was found beneath the columns. What is the source of the thermite and what caused the steel to liquefy? Burning jet fuel does not reach a temperature high enough to liquefy steel.

• What caused WTC Building 7 to fall?

• The maneuver required to fly an airliner at the trajectory of the one that hit the Pentagon would be difficult for an experienced pilot, and some of the air traffic controllers watching the flight believed it to be a military aircraft at the time. How did a terrorist with limited — and by all accounts very poor — flying ability pull off such a maneuver without crashing into the ground prior to reaching the Pentagon?

• Why was the hole in the Pentagon wall too small to accommodate an airliner — both in width and height? Why were no identifiable parts of a Boeing 757 found at the crash site? Why was an engine turbofan from an A3 Skywarrior found at the crash scene? If Flight 77 did not crash into the Pentagon, what happened to it and its passengers and crew?

• In the weeks and months after the attack, men alleged to have been the hijackers and supposed to have died in the attacks began turning up alive. At least seven of them have been seen since 9/11 and one was found to have died prior to 9/11 in an airplane crash. What is the explanation for this?

• Why did Bush begin talking to cabinet members about attacking Iraq while the Afghanistan attack was being formulated?

• If we attacked Afghanistan with the intention of defeating al-Qaida and killing Osama bin Laden, why are we still there? Al-Qaida is no longer in Afghanistan and bin Laden is reportedly dead.

• Why did the Pentagon participate in a cover-up and attempt to mislead the 9/11 Commission?

• Why do members of the 9/11 Commission believe there are still many unanswered questions regarding the events of that day? Why did Commission members say they believed the Commission was set up to fail? Why have there been no charges of obstruction filed against those who stonewalled and lied to the Commission?

• Did someone or someones in government or within some shadowy quasi-governmental agency participate in or facilitate the attacks? Was it a coup against the Bush regime? Could that explain Bush’s seeming confusion and his trips crisscrossing the Southern portion of the U.S. before going back to Washington, D.C.? What other lies are we being told?

• And a new question: What’s on those 28 redacted pages in the 9/11 Commission Report that congressmen have called "shocking?"

Why aren’t you asking some of these same questions?





Parents of SEAL Hero Demand Obama Quit Over ISIS Threat
"As commander-in-chief, your actions, or lack thereof, Mr. President, cost lives," said Billy and Karen Vaughn. As you bumble about in your golf cart, slapping on a happy face and fist-pounding your buddies, your cowardly lack of leadership has left a gaping hole — not only in America’s security but the security of the entire globe. Your message has come across loud and clear, sir: You are not up to this job. You know it. We know it. The world knows it. Please vacate the people’s house and allow a man or woman of courage and substance to seize the reins of this out-of-control thug-fest and regain the balance we, America, have provided throughout our great history. You, sir, are the JV team. It’s time for you to step down and allow a true leader to restore our honor and protect our sons and daughters. America has always been exceptional. And she will be again. You, Mr. President, are a bump in our road.”


Parents of SEAL Hero Demand Obama Quit Over ISIS Threat

Parents of SEAL Hero Demand Obama Quit Over ISIS Threat

Newsmax — Tuesday, September 2, 2014

By: Drew MacKenzie

The parents of a  SEAL Team 6 member who died in Afghanistan have called on President Barack Obama to resign, saying that his "cowardly lack of leadership" in handling the barbaric Islamic State threatens U.S. and global security.

 In an open letter published at WorldTribune.com, Billy and Karen Vaughn, whose son Aaron died in 2011, wrote that they were stunned by Obama’s decision to go golfing directly after giving a somber speech about the beheading of American journalist James Foley by the jihadists, also known as ISIS.



"As commander-in-chief, your actions, or lack thereof, Mr. President, cost lives," said the Vaughns, whose son was killed in action when a Chinook helicopter was shot down over Afghanistan with 30 American soldiers on board.



"As you bumble about in your golf cart, slapping on a happy face and fist-pounding your buddies, your cowardly lack of leadership has left a gaping hole — not only in America’s security but the security of the entire globe. Your message has come across loud and clear, sir: You are not up to this job. You know it. We know it. The world knows it.



"Please vacate the people’s house and allow a man or woman of courage and substance to seize the reins of this out-of-control thug-fest and regain the balance we, America, have provided throughout our great history.

"

The Vaughns, whose son was Special Operations Chief of the SEALs unit that killed al-Qaida terror leader Osama Bin Laden during a Pakistan raid in March 2011, went on to say that Obama’s administration has "lurched from one disaster to another."

 

They wrote, "Never in my lifetime have I witnessed such despair and such growing fear that the world’s last best hope, America, has finally been dismantled.

 

"You spearheaded the ambitious rush to end the wars in both Iraq and Afghanistan, with no plan on how to do so effectively. Also, the release of 'the Taliban five' in exchange for one American, without consulting Congress, is also on your shoulders.

 

"You have been at the helm during unprecedented national security leaks — including, but not limited to the outing of SEAL Team 6 on the bin Laden raid, the outing of the Pakistani doctor who provided the intelligence for that raid, the outing of Afghanistan’s CIA station chief, and the outing of your personal 'kill list' to make you look tough."



The Vaughns said that after Foley’s execution by ISIS savages, they were left with "a level of rage known only to those of us who have sacrificed unspeakable offerings on the altar of world peace."



Noting that their "offering" was their son, they added, "Now we have this recent, heinous event, the beheading of an American citizen by a barbaric organization you foolishly referred to as 'the JV team.'



"You, sir, are the JV team. It’s time for you to step down and allow a true leader to restore our honor and protect our sons and daughters. America has always been exceptional. And she will be again. You, Mr. President, are a bump in our road."



Billy Vaughn, author of "Betrayed: The Shocking True Story of Extortion 17," also told MailOnline that he’s angry at the way Obama conducts his news conferences. 

"I'd like to see him have some passion about anything going on in the world instead of just speaking in a monotone voice like he has a script that has been made up," Vaughn said.





Is President Obama An Agent For Islamists The Way King Edward VIII Was For The Nazis?: “The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.” — Barack Obama
Islam is becoming more extreme with each passing year and with only token impediment from Obama. Is he a Muslim helping Islam achieve global domination? Islam at its marrow is the evildoer. It isn’t because the majority of Muslims are involved in a global jihad; they are a very small minority. It’s because more than 90% of Muslims refuse to speak out against the barbaric goals of the terrorists in their ranks. In many ways radical Islam is no different than Nazism of the 1930s. But rather than a single race following the evil edict of Adolf Hitler, evil & radical Islam is driven by 250 million radical Muslims devoted not to a man & twisted hate & political dogma, but to their god, their prophet and even their imam. To go against them & the Quran does not risk jail or execution but the eternal damnation of hellfire.


Is President Obama An Agent For Islamists The Way King Edward VIII Was For The Nazis?: “The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.” — Barack Obama

Is President Obama An Agent For Islamists The Way King Edward VIII Was For The Nazis?

August 27, 2014 by John Myers — Personal Liberty Digest

"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." — Barack Obama

"The two people who have caused me the most trouble in my life are Wallis Simpson and Hitler." — Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother

Islam is becoming more extreme with each passing year and with only token impediment from President Barack Obama. I believe the president is either naïve or he is purposely helping Islamic aspirations for global domination.

That there is something wrong at the White House is becoming apparent in the wake of the cancer that can be seen in the growing violence in the Middle East by the Islamic State. The terrorist group also known as ISIS or ISIL is a cancer that is a long-term threat to all of us. It is a cancer whose virility can be diagnosed by the gruesome beheading of American photojournalist James Foley, reportedly by a born and bred Englishman who joined ISIS and is now a wanted traitor.

Still, apologists say this and every other terror attack and broadcast execution have nothing to do with Islam. Rather, such acts are the work of terrorists or — as former President George W. Bush called the 9/11 terrorists — "evildoers."

News flash: Islam at its marrow is the evildoer. It isn’t because the majority of Muslims are involved in a global jihad. In truth, they are a very small minority. Instead, it’s because more than 90 percent of Muslims refuse to speak out against the barbaric goals of the terrorists in their ranks.

In many ways radical Islam is no different than Nazism of the 1930s. But rather than a single race following the evil edict of Adolf Hitler, evil and radical Islam is driven by millions of Muslims following the teachings of the Quran.

Liberalism brings with it an army of appeasers. In the late 1930s, British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain and America’s ambassador to Britain, Joseph Kennedy, thought Hitler was a leader they could work with. Certainly, most of the 40 million Germans didn’t want war. When the Nazi leadership pressed it upon them, a small minority protested and many were exterminated.

World War III may have commenced, and the apologists are doing their utmost to deny the fact that radical Islam has its sights set not only on the domination of the Middle East but also on — within the next half century — the world.

In an interview with Mike Huckabee, author Joel Richardson said the number of radical Muslims is as high as 250 million. They are soulless when it comes to murder and mayhem against Western democratic nations. That is a quarter of a billion people spread around the world — some likely living not far from you, some hoping for the death and destruction of "nonbelievers" as is proclaimed in the Quran. This idea that Islam is a peace-loving religion — as expressed by Bush and emphasized by a man I consider to be a Muslim, Obama — puts America in grave jeopardy.

I believe that Islam is as evil and an even greater world threat to free thought than Nazism. Radical Muslims are fighting a guerrilla war in which thousands, and sometimes millions, of Islamic zealots become more radical each year and more willing to take up arms against the very peoples who provide them freedom and comfort.

Two hundred and fifty million Muslims are devoted not to a man and twisted hate and political dogma but to their god, their prophet and even their imam. To go against them and the Quran does not risk jail or even execution but the eternal damnation of hellfire.

The Traitor King

If I ever get to the pearly gates and meet Saint Peter and if I am able to get past all my sins, he might ask me what my area of expertise was. I will not say investing or energy or writing, I will say the era of World War II because I have soaked it in all my life through writings and interviews with men of both sides of the European theater of war. Yet one evening, as I watched a documentary titled "Britain’s Nazi King," I realized how little of that time period I really understood. According to a respected production company, King Edward VIII and his consort, Wallis Simpson, corresponded openly with the Nazi hierarchy and even knew of Hitler’s plan to restore him as the rightful king after the Germans invaded and occupied England. This all happened as Ambassador Kennedy and many others on both sides of the Atlantic believed the defeat of England was fait accompli.

My wife, born in England and a royalist to her core, was out the evening I watched "Britain’s Nazi King." When she returned home, I told her what I had just watched. She looked at me as if I had completely cracked up.

I didn’t raise the subject again but read much more about it, including how Prime Minister Winston Churchill told one confidant that he believed Edward and Simpson should be shot as traitors.

My wife was shocked when a National Geographic program came on TV regarding the traitorous acts of Edward, especially when she realized that it took five decades before this revelation had been revealed by declassified FBI files.

My wife — just as my English mother — had always believed that the king had abdicated the throne simply because he wanted to marry an American divorcee.

That was hardly so, as it turned out. Allied intelligence had a huge case file on Edward and Simpson. Luckily, Edward had only ceremonial powers. He did not in any way direct the government or the political decisions made by Great Britain.

What if Edward had been an imperial king with immense powers? What if he had not only had dictatorial control of the empire but also a group of loyalists in his court that would have done anything to protect him? What if the aristocracy had been fully invested in him? If that had been the case, I dare say I would be writing these words to you in German.

What Did The President Know And When Did He Know It?

What if there is even a small chance that Obama is loyal to the Quran and Islam? Does that sound crazy? It’s no crazier than Edward being the Nazi king. And even if there is one chance in 10 that Obama is loyal to the Quran and Islam, it deserves consideration because Islam may be a nemesis to the West.

Factor in that there is only one chance in 100 that I am correct of the threat of Islam. Do you want to see your nation destroyed, your values upended, over one chance in a 100? Millions of people play the lottery for one chance in a million. And if a doctor said you have a 1 percent chance of having terminal cancer, how upset would you feel?

I feel very upset. Maybe you and I face only a one in 100 chance of Islam obliterating us, our children and our grandchildren. But even at that, I don’t like those odds. I can only hope I am dead wrong and not a dead infidel.

Yours in good times and bad,

–John Myers





Is Barack Obama Purposely Fueling A Race War In America?
It started when Michael Brown [a black] allegedly committed a “strong arm” robbery 10 minutes before his fatal encounter with a police officer [a white]. Are you really going to suggest that if a black cop had shot a white 18-year-old criminal under those exact circumstances there would be a massive media presence, rioting & looting by whites, Holder calling for an independent investigation, and Obama bewailing the loss of a white criminal's life? If you tell me that such is the case, you are either lying to me or lying to yourself. But more importantly, the results of that shooting and the urban violence that has erupted in its wake began with Obama who has concocted his version of social nitroglycerin in the USA — By underscoring racial inequality at every opportunity while failing to create economic opportunities for blacks, and by arming large and small city police forces with military hardware that is the envy of some nations


Is Barack Obama Purposely Fueling A Race War In America?

Is Barack Obama Fueling A Race War?

August 20, 2014 by John Myers — Personal Liberty Digest

Responding to rioting, looting and a police force that at times looked more like U.S. combat forces in Ferguson, Missouri, President Barack Obama said: "[I]t’s important to remember how this started. We lost a young man, Michael Brown, in heartbreaking and tragic circumstances. He was 18 years old, and his family will never hold Michael in their arms again."

It really started when Michael Brown allegedly committed a "strong arm" robbery of a convenience store 10 minutes before his fatal encounter with a police officer. But more importantly, the results of that shooting and the urban violence that has erupted in its wake began with Obama and his bid for the presidency, in which he concocted his version of social nitroglycerin:

1. By underscoring racial inequality at every opportunity while failing to create economic opportunities for blacks,

2. And by arming large and small city police forces with military hardware that is the envy of some nations.

These two ingredients had an explosive and predictable reaction in Ferguson, and some analysts have suggested that other urban areas are a tinderbox for the violence witnessed in Missouri over the past two weeks.

A Time Before Cops Were Wannabe SEALs

In February 1986, my publisher called me up on a Sunday morning telling me he had already rented me a car and that I needed to get to it with my camera and drive hundreds of miles to Hinton, Alberta, where two trains had collided. It was one of those "I can’t stand this job," moments but it became a great experience because I was the first reporter on the scene. Along the highway, just as I saw the police barricade, I pulled over the car and grabbed my Pentax. I worked my way halfway down a mountain and may have "accidentally" crossed the yellow tape the police had set up. I knew I had to quickly take pictures of the locomotives that had collided. They were still spewing smoke and emergency workers were taking body bags off the trains. I knew the opportunity wouldn’t last long because Royal Canadian Mounted Police were milling around the crash. Plus, as it turned out, 23 people were dead.

Halfway through the roll, I decided to take out the film and hide it on my person. As I began my second roll, a Mountie rolled up on me and asked me what I thought I was doing. I showed him my press credentials. He politely asked me for my camera, his gun still tucked safely in its covered leather holster. As he opened up the back of the camera and confiscated my film, he apologized, saying the area was sealed off from reporters. Then he gave me the best directions to get back to my rental car.

It turned out my photos were published nationally because they were the only legitimate ones of frenzied work being carried out hours after the crash. All these years later, I’m left flabbergasted in light of the military muscle of the police in Ferguson during the first stage of unrest, including the detainment of two reporters at a McDonald’s for simply doing their job. Police forces, even in small cities, look and act like combat troops. So much for "preserve and protect." We live in an age where police are on "search and destroy" missions.

To a large extent, the Obama administration has played a large part in the militarization of police forces around the country — a force that, when used, is held to great criticism by the president and his attorney general, Eric Holder.

On Aug. 14, under the headline "The Pentagon gave nearly half a billion dollars of military gear to local law enforcement last year," The Washington Post reported:

The events in Ferguson, Missouri this week are an uncomfortable reminder of the militarization of America’s small town law enforcement agencies. The photos coming out of the town–of heavily armed officers in full combat gear squaring off against unarmed protesters–look like images we’re used to seeing from places like Gaza, Turkey, or Egypt, not from a midwestern suburb of 21,000 people.

One of the ways police departments have armed themselves in recent years is through the Defense Department’s excess property program, known as the 1033 Program. It "permits the Secretary of Defense to transfer, without charge, excess U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) personal property (supplies and equipment) to state and local law enforcement agencies (LEAs)," according to the National Law Enforcement and Corrections Technology Center.

Small-city cops have been given state-of-the-art sniper rifles, machine guns, grenade launchers, helmets, flak jackets and explosive-proof armored tactical vehicles, otherwise known as tanks. Even military helicopters piloted by cops with machine guns pointed at the populace fly above America’s not-so-friendly skies.

I used to go to the boxing gym along with cops. Some of them were great guys. Some of them gave me the willies. All of them stuck together. But there wasn’t one of them that I would want pointing a .50 caliber machine gun at me. And if you are comfortable with local law enforcement aiming such weapons at you, you are probably comfortable with anything.

Arms And Race

That the police feel vulnerable I understand, but that they carry such weapons I cannot understand. I also feel vulnerable in some parts of where I live and in cities I visit. If it were legal, I would still own and, on occasion, carry my Smith & Wesson 10 mm; but I was forced to sell it when I moved to Canada.

But let us be honest with ourselves and ask two important questions:

• Has Barack Obama eased racial tensions or exacerbated them?

• Does the TV news — particularly CNN and MSNBC — over-report the victimization of African-Americans at the hands of whites?

I believe the answer to both of these questions is a resounding "yes." African-Americans are mad as hell. And at least some of that blame must fall on the shoulders of Obama, who promised blacks racial healing along with economic prosperity in his 2008 presidential campaign and then miserably failed at delivering either.

In November, The New York Times published an opinion piece written by Mark Potok of the Southern Poverty Law Center in which he wrote:

Have race relations worsened since Obama was elected? The best data, two polls commissioned by The Associated Press, suggest the answer is yes. The number of Americans with "explicit anti-black attitudes" rose from 48 percent in 2008 to 51 percent in 2012, while implicit racist attitudes went from 49 percent to 56 percent. Another set of A.P. polls showed anti-Latino attitudes had climbed between 2011 and 2012.

The attacks on local law enforcement agencies by Obama for their handling of two particular incidents — the first involving his former professor, Henry Louis Gates Jr., in the summer of 2009 and the second being the death of Trayvon Martin in 2012 ("If I had a son, he would look like Trayvon") — reflect a president who is, at best, reckless in his comments about race and, at worse, intent to divide a nation that is already deeply divided.

This headline by Breitbart News last week blared out an ominous fact: "5 Race Riots in Obama’s Post-Racial America."

The story concluded:

These are incidents of mass violence, not merely individual crime incidents. And such incidents are testimony to the continuing sense of racial injustice purveyed by the media and the Obama administration.

And the beat goes on. Obama instructed the feds to perform an independent autopsy on Brown. (He must think the country simply can’t trust those white folks in Missouri.)

Thus, we get this statement from Justice Department spokesman Brian Fallon:

Due to the extraordinary circumstances involved in this case and at the request of the Brown family, Attorney General Holder has instructed Justice Department officials to arrange for an additional autopsy to be performed by a federal medical examiner.

What is extraordinary is that the Obama administration is becoming directly involved in a police shooting. Then again, it was a white cop who shot a 6-foot-4 black man. (Brown was 18, which means he was eligible to serve the country in combat.) And from the appearances of his alleged robbery, Brown was at least on that day acting like a thug.

Is anybody really going to suggest that if a black cop had shot a white 18-year-old under those exact circumstances there would be a massive media presence, rioting and looting by whites, and Holder calling for an independent investigation?

If you tell me that such is the case, you are either lying to me or lying to yourself.

The fact is Obama is bringing all this hell to fruition. With one hand he is arming local police like they are the Marines, and with the other hand he is wiping the angst off his furrowed brow because of the racial injustice that prevails in his America. Sounds like the perfect combination for a race war and a state of national emergency.

Yours in good times and bad,

–John Myers





Do We Have A Sociopath In The White House Who Doesn’t Like America And Is Purposely Fiddling While The World Burns?
Things aren’t going so well for America. There was major rioting all week in Ferguson, Missouri. There are still no jobs for middle-class Americans. Our southern border is still under siege. Obamacare is a disaster. Our veterans are dying at the hands of the incompetent VA. ISIS threatens to create a radical Muslim empire in the Middle East. And the world (from Israel to Ukraine to Syria to Iraq) is literally on fire. Where is Obama? On vacation!… again! Isn’t his indifference to the problems of America and disconnect from reality, strange? “No!” I believe we have a president who is an arrogant, egomaniacal sociopath. Either Obama just couldn’t care less or he just doesn’t like America very much, so he’s purposely fiddling while Rome burns. Or like O.J. Simpson, maybe he’s searching for the answers to these terrible crises in the holes of America’s greatest golf courses.


Do We Have A Sociopath In The White House Who Doesn’t Like America And Is Purposely Fiddling While The World Burns?

Do We Have A Sociopath In The White House?

August 21, 2014 by Wayne Allyn Root — Personal Liberty Digest

Watch the video here: http://personalliberty.com/sociopath-white-house/ or read the text of it below:

Hi. I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. Things aren’t going so well for America. There was major rioting all week in Ferguson, Missouri. There are still no jobs for middle-class Americans. Our southern border is still under siege. Obamacare is a disaster. Our veterans are dying at the hands of the incompetent VA. ISIS threatens to create a radical Muslim empire in the Middle East. And the world (from Israel to Ukraine to Syria to Iraq) is literally on fire.

Where is our President? On vacation… again. 

This time, even the media are whispering. "Where is Obama? Isn’t his indifference to the problems of America and disconnect from reality, strange?" The simple answer is, "No." This is how he’s been his entire adult life. It all started at Columbia University.

I believe we have a president who is an arrogant, egomaniacal sociopath.

Here is the definition of a "sociopath" from the Urban Dictionary online:

A person with antisocial personality disorder. Probably the most widely recognized personality disorder. A sociopath is often well liked because of their charm and high charisma, but they do not usually care about other people. They think mainly of themselves and often blame others for the things that they do. They have a complete disregard for rules and lie constantly. They seldom feel guilt or learn from punishments.

My new book "The Murder of the Middle Class" presents the story in vivid detail. I was Obama’s college classmate at Columbia University, Class of 1983. I’ve been trying to tell America about Obama’s "problem" for seven long years now.

By college, a person’s personality, attitude and behavior are fairly well set. That’s why Obama’s Columbia days tell us so much about his behavior as president today. Where was he? Why does virtually no one from Columbia remember the future president of the United States? Why did the future president make an impression on none of his classmates?

Things rarely change. Thirty years ago, my classmate was rarely seen. Thirty years later, he rarely is seen conducting the business of the presidency. No one should be surprised.

What do I know about Obama at Columbia? Nothing. I never met him. As I’ve reported countless times to the media, Obama and I shared the same major: political science. We were both pre-law. It was a small class (about 700 students). The political science department was even smaller (maybe 150 students) and was a close-knit group. I thought I knew or had at least met everyone in this department.

But I never met Obama. Never even heard of him. Worse, neither did anyone I knew at Columbia. Think about that. Our classmate is president of the United States. Yet he didn’t leave a footprint.

In all my years of publicly questioning Obama’s absence at Columbia, I know of only two possible sightings. Two people called me claiming to be classmates. One caller claimed that he thinks he saw Obama once in a bar across from Columbia blowing smoke rings. Another called to say he thinks he saw Obama in the cafeteria at Barnard (our sister school for women only).

Two possible Obama sightings in 30 years: one smoking in a bar, the other at a women’s cafeteria. Isn’t that the perfect guy to run your country?

Obama defenders and the media (I know; they’re the same) interpreted what I said wrongly. I never said Obama didn’t attend Columbia. I said he was never in class, perpetually absent, missing in action. Sound familiar?

Obama acts exactly the same today as president as he did as a student at Columbia. Obama has always believed that Obama is brilliant and better than the rest of us. He’s arrogant and detached. He thinks he’s too smart to have to actually do the work the rest of us do. He’s above it all. Why attend class? "What could someone as smart as me possibly learn in class?"

It’s the same story today. Obama rarely attends meetings, even with his cabinet. He’s too busy playing golf, taking vacations or attending fundraisers.

This past February, Obama skipped two national security meetings focused on Russia’s potential invasion of Ukraine. He was too busy to attend a meeting about a crisis that could lead to World War III.

Even if Obama wasn’t concerned about Russia invading Ukraine, certainly he finds America’s jobs crisis important, right? Wrong. Obama never bothered to convene one meeting of his own Jobs Council in a full year, even with unemployment and underemployment at crisis levels.

Even more remarkable, within two weeks of that story, Obama closed down his Jobs Council — with 12 million Americans still counted officially as unemployed.

So what is so important in Obama’s life? Golf and fundraisers. PolitiFact.com, the nonpartisan fact checker, confirmed our President golfed often and attended 106 fundraisers during just a six-month period wherein he could find no time, or interest, to attend even one meeting of his own Jobs Council.

And where was Obama the night of the Benghazi attack? Both Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Martin Dempsey testified Obama was absent that night.

Four brave Americans died while Obama was "absent." What could be so important that Obama never checked in to ask a question or discuss a rescue attempt from 5:30 p.m. until the next morning (when everyone was dead)?

The track record is consistent. Just like his college days, Obama believes he’s too gifted to do the actual work of president. He’s just too busy to have to worry about the plight of unemployed Americans. He’s even too important to worry about young black males killing each other in Chicago, or being shot by police, or serious unrest, rioting and looting in Ferguson, Missouri. He’s got more important things to do than stay in touch as a U.S. embassy is under attack. Hamas is lobbing missiles into Israel. Who cares? "I’ve got a golf game in the morning."

To be exact, Obama has played 186 rounds of golf and counting versus Bush’s 24.

Does Obama ever work? Sure. Every once in a while he throws a "Beer Summit."

Nothing much has changed since Columbia University. Not Obama’s personality, not his attitude, not his behavior. Either Obama is detached and just couldn’t care less or he just doesn’t like America very much, so he’s purposely fiddling while Rome burns. Or like O.J. Simpson, maybe he’s searching for the answers to all of these terrible crises in the holes and sand traps of America’s greatest golf courses.

This is most certainly "The Murder of the Middle Class." And the death of America.

I believe we have a sociopath in the White House.

I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. God bless America.





Obama Is A Radical Islamic Wolf Clothed As A Christian: He is purposely letting Islamic extremists overthrow governments to achieve Islam’s goal of world domination
The most damning evidence against Obama has been his mishandling of ISIS which is engaging in the most powerful war against Christians since the Middle Ages. ISIS stands at the cusp of overrunning and controlling the Mideast and is unlike any threat the USA has faced. ISIS is determined to build a united greater Arabia, ISIS’s violence knows no limits, and even al-Qaida has disavowed ISIS. Most dangerous of all is that as ISIS grows stronger, the USA is defended by the beliefs & actions of Obama, the leader of the free world, who has ushered these shameful utterances to a Christian Nation: Obama recites the Muslim call to prayer in Arabic; Obama praises and glorifies Islam; Obama states “Islam has always been a part of America’s story.”; and Obama bows to the Saudi king, yet does not bow when meeting the queen of England.


Obama Is A Radical Islamic Wolf Clothed As A Christian: He is purposely letting Islamic extremists overthrow governments to achieve Islam’s goal of world domination

Is Barack Obama Aiding And Abetting ISIS?

August 13, 2014 by John Myers

[The Muslim call to prayer is] "one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset." — Barack Obama

To borrow upon the famous quote from one of the world’s greatest leaders, Winston Churchill, during the Battle of Britain and apply it to President Barack Obama’s response to the Islamic threat that is ISIS: Never in the field of human conflict was so much harm done to so many by just one man.

Churchill and Obama: seldom have two names in one sentence been in such contrast. There stood Churchill, a patriot with a distinguished military record who wanted to take part in the invasion task force that hit the beaches of Normandy only to be ordered not to by the King of England. Churchill, was always at the ready to die for his country. Churchill was striving for world democracy and freedom.

Then there is Obama who is, at the very least, sympathetic to Islam and its goal of global domination.

The most damning evidence against Obama has been his mishandling of the Islamic State group: the most powerful jihad against Christians since the Middle Ages. ISIS stands at the cusp of overrunning and controlling the Mideast in a way that has not been seen since the Ottoman Empire ruled the region 400 years ago.

Does Anyone In Government Read History?

ISIS is unlike any threat the United States has faced. It is determined to build a united greater Arabia, and it may have the petro-wealth and determination to do it. The group’s violence knows no limits. Even al-Qaida has disavowed ISIS.

History is filled with revolutions upon which every cycle becomes more extreme, more violent.

During the French Revolution, Maximilien de Robespierre was a prominent leader who was both celebrated for the reforms he brought and despised for the terror that he helped instill — a terror so frightful his own head was taken by the guillotine.

It was the same during the Iranian Revolution 35 years ago. Sadegh Ghotbzadeh, who went on to become Ayatollah Khomeini’s foreign minister, was part of the group of radicals who overthrew the Shah of Iran. Two years later, Ghotbzadeh was executed, ostensibly for not being radical enough. The same fate almost happened to the first president of Iran, Abolhassan Bani-Sadr, who was also not seen as religious or righteous enough and had to flee for his life to France where he is living out his old age today.

Radical Islam is on the same path and the culmination of it to date has been ISIS, which is not a group of fundamentalists whose goal is to punish Westerners because of their presence in the Mideast but rather a religious, political and military powerhouse that has been growing unchecked since Obama’s withdrawal from Iraq at the end of 2011. Given that Obama announced this move when he ran for President in 2008, all ISIS has had to do was be patient. The result is a military force that is overrunning Iraq’s much larger army and now has some of the best U.S. military hardware. Its ultimate goal is not just to drive Westerners from the Mideast, but to have Islam as the dominant religion with sectarian systems of government around the world.

Bush Broke It, Obama Crushed It

Former Secretary of State Colin Powell famously dissuaded President George H.W. Bush from pushing into Iraq after American forces had driven Saddam Hussein from his occupation of Kuwait saying, "If you break it, you own it."

Carry the argument over to a piece of fine bone china and Bush did break it. And as wrongheaded as the invasion and unwanted occupation of Iraq were, George W. Bush was willing to own it and fix it as best he could. In contrast, Obama has walked away from the China shop, swept the shards under the rug as best he could, and posted a neon sign that said: "Please loot at your convenience."

That a fundamentalist group like ISIS is growing in power and prestige must be left at the doorstep of the current occupant of the White House. Some people may say it has happened out of ignorance, while others sympathetic to Obama will say it is because of his background as an anti-colonist. I say it is because he is an Islamist and a radical one at that.

Obama has downplayed the threat of radical Islam inside and outside the Mideast all along. At the Democratic National Convention he declared that al-Qaida is on the path to defeat. How right he was. What we didn’t know was al-Qaida’s defeat was from an almost unopposed ISIS, which was wreaking havoc on Syria. The President had to know this through his daily intelligence briefings. He also had to know ISIS was taking aim at Iraq, a country in which America sacrificed more than 4,000 lives and nearly $2 trillion — a sacrifice made for a country with massive oil reserves lying at the doorstep of even larger oil reserves in Iran and Saudi Arabia.

Of course, Obama has ordered a handful of airstrikes this week as he has hunkered down thinking over this Iraq crisis between golf games during his current vacation at Martha’s Vineyard. And let’s not forget that in June, Obama sent 300 military advisers to Iraq. Three-hundred! That’s a handful more men than George Custer had at Little Big Horn.

Obama: Ignoramus Or Islamist?

I don’t for a moment believe that Obama is stupid, that he doesn’t realize the stakes in the Mideast, including his tepid diplomacy regarding fighting in Gaza. If I am right, and if you agree with me, that only leaves us with one answer: Obama is purposefully letting Islamic extremists overthrow governments that were outlined and established by Western imperialists, regardless of the costs to the world and to the United States.

Forget what the bleeding-heart liberals and the Muslim apologists in the mass media say; growing radical Islamic elements are bent on world domination just as surely as was the Kremlin under Josef Stalin. Their message abounds and volumes have been written about it.

Below is just one example from the Minister of Interior and National Security in the Hamas government in Gaza, Fathi Hammad

"We look forward to future victories, in which, Allah willing, we will liberate our land, our Jerusalem, our Al-Aqsa [Mosque], our cities and our villages, Allah willing, all this in preparation for establishing the next Islamic Caliphate. Therefore, brothers and sisters, we are at the brink of a period of global Islamic culture, whose fuel is Gaza, whose spearhead is Gaza, its Jihad fighters (Mujahideen) and commanders are Gaza, Allah willing."

Today, ISIS with its army could soon earn $100 million per month as it seizes control of captured oil and gas facilities in Syria and Iraq.

Most dangerous of all is that as ISIS garners greater wealth and more territory, the United States is defended by the beliefs and actions of Obama, a man who is the leader of the free world who has ushered these shameful utterances to a Christian Nation:

• Obama recites the Muslim call to prayer in Arabic.

• Obama praises and glorifies Islam: "convey our deep appreciation for the Islamic faith."

• Obama states, "Islam has always been a part of America’s story. There is a mosque in every state in the union."

• Obama bows to the Saudi king, yet does not bow when meeting the queen of England.

Obama’s words and his inaction against radical Islam show him for what he is, an Islamic wolf clothed as a Christian.

A few months ago, I wondered how much worse can things become given Obama has only two and a half more years in the Oval Office. Given his actions as President and as a sympathizer for radical Islam, things could become much worse.

Yours in good times and bad,

–John Myers





The Walls Are Crumbling Down Around 9/11; Why?
An absolutely monumental shift is in process that most have not recognized yet. The truth, or at least some truth, is about to be shown to the American masses about 9/11. Why? The most optimistic theory is that humanity has awoken and is finally driving out the truth that is too big for even the powers that be to hold back now. The most pessimistic theory is that this is all part of a greater script in which certain truths about 9/11 will be revealed. And then, quickly, a massive event will so engulf the world in chaos that it will be wiped down the memory hole. The most logical theory is that Congress will reveal a fake Saudi Arabia connection with a few fall guys in the George W. Bush Administration, orchestrated as a semi-inside job that will so infuriate and obsess the U.S. populace that the more damning evidence that Putin releases about 9/11 will be lost in the noise as the U.S. begins to go on war footing against Saudi Arabia.


The Walls Are Crumbling Down Around 9/11; Why?

Please click here — http://personalliberty.com/walls-crumbling-around-911/ — to read the article — "The Walls Are Crumbling Down Around 9/11; Why?" — and to view its video content.





Shyster Obama Is Purposely Creating A Heartbreaking Illegal Immigrant Crisis: Obama hopes to force our kind Christian Nation to make a dreadfully wrong decision under duress by agreeing not only to help the illegals, but to grant amnesty for 12 million other illegals already here
Obama wants to create catastrophe and force the American people to make a dreadfully wrong decision under duress. Obama wants our good-hearted Christian Nation to see women, children & families begging for help. He wants immigrants to be in the worst possible shape so that our hearts break and we agree to take them all in. He is purposely creating a crisis, hoping to force us to overreact by agreeing not only to help these illegals, but to grant amnesty for 12 million other illegals already here. Obama demands billions of our dollars for his purposely created crisis — not to solve the crisis — but to pay for lawyers for each illegal (to prevent deportation) and to reward them for their "illegal" immigration


Shyster Obama Is Purposely Creating A Heartbreaking Illegal Immigrant Crisis: Obama hopes to force our kind Christian Nation to make a dreadfully wrong decision under duress by agreeing not only to help the illegals, but to grant amnesty for 12 million other illegals already here

Send The Invasion Of Illegals To Beverly Hills And Georgetown

July 24, 2014 by Wayne Allyn Root -- Personal Liberty Digest  

Watch the video here — http://personalliberty.com/send-invasion-illegals-beverly-hills-georgetown/ — or read the text of it below:

Hi! I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. The massive illegal immigrant invasion of our southern border is more than just a national crisis. It’s part of the greatest conspiracy in world history — a purposeful attempt to create catastrophe, overwhelm the system and force the American people to make a dreadfully wrong decision under duress.

Barack Obama wants our good-hearted Christian Nation to see women, children and families begging for help, begging to live the American dream. He wants immigrants to be in the worst possible shape after a long journey from Central America — starving, injured, diseased and in such terrible shape our hearts break and we agree to take them all in.

He is purposely creating a crisis, hoping to force us to overreact by agreeing not only to help these new arrivals, but to grant amnesty for 12 million other illegals already here.

He wants us to approve government expansion and billions of dollars in new spending. Will he use that money to "solve" the crisis? No! He’ll use it to pay for lawyers for each illegal immigrant (to prevent deportation) and to hand them billions of dollars in welfare, food stamps, aid to dependent children, education and, of course, free meals at school — all paid for by the middle class.

It’s a two-for-one. This is how you create a permanent, loyal Democratic voter bloc at the same time you bankrupt the middle class.

As I explain in my new book The Murder of the Middle Class, this is a purposeful plan right out of the Richard Cloward-Frances Fox Piven playbook. How do I know? I was Obama’s college classmate at Columbia University, Class of ’83. We learned this plan at Columbia. My classmates vowed to someday put it into effect to overwhelm the system, collapse capitalism, crash the U.S. economy and force America to its knees.

From that position of crisis, weakness and panic, they vowed to "fundamentally change the country." Recognize the plan? It’s happening right now.

So how do we fight back? Obama and his socialist cabal are liars, frauds and hypocrites. Yes, they want to help the poor and downtrodden — but only with your money.

Yes, they want to house the world’s homeless — but only in your home.

Yes, they want to let in the world’s poverty-stricken immigrants — but only into your backyard.

None of this "dirty work" ever touches their mansions, yachts, private jets, private schools or, God forbid, their precious children.

Last I checked, Sasha and Malia Obama won’t go to school next to shoeless illegal immigrants with lice, scabies and tuberculosis. Last I checked, illegals with gang tattoos from head to toe won’t be mugging old ladies or dealing crack in front of the Georgetown mansions of lobbyists, lawyers and politicians like Hillary Clinton.

Or maybe they will. 

Bringing this flood of illegal children (have you noticed how with liberals it’s always "we’re doing it for the children?") into nice, middle-class communities to destroy their neighborhoods, schools and budgets is all part of Obama’s plan to overwhelm the system and murder the middle class.

It’s time we counter these liberal, elite hypocrites. First, we must stand and fight to the last breath. The answer is so simple: Send them back.

Then take action to secure our border.

The last thing any Republican should do now is support any form of amnesty. Are we that stupid? That message would result in millions more poverty-stricken illegals coming.

But in the meantime, let’s demand these hordes of illegal immigrants — many carry disease; many, if not most, are not "innocent minors" but are tattooed gangbangers, hardened criminals, drug dealers and murderers — be housed in Beverly Hills, or the Upper East Side of Manhattan, or fashionable Georgetown.

Georgetown is the part of Washington, D.C., where all the liberal, elitist hypocrite politicians live. If Obama and his socialist cabal want illegals in this country, let them step over them as they get into their limos or shop for their $2,500 dresses.

But don’t stop there. Let’s send them to Beverly Hills, Brentwood, the Upper East Side of Manhattan, Scarsdale, Great Neck, Malibu, Westwood, Brentwood, Palo Alto, Napa, Atherton, Menlo Park, Carmel –and don’t forget the ritziest neighborhoods in Boston and Chicago.

These rich enclaves have the money and resources, so let Obama’s socialist cabal live among the poor, huddled masses.

Give them jobs at the Ralph Lauren store on Rodeo Drive, or the Armani store on Madison Avenue, or at Saks Fifth Avenue.

Why doesn’t Rachel Maddow hire one of them as the booker for her MSNBC show?

Since Obama is so quick to sue American companies for daring to demand English be spoken at the office, Michelle Obama can hire a few to work in key positions at the White House. Perhaps they can speak Spanish only, while directing national security?

Perhaps Clinton can get one of these illegals a $600,000 minimal-work job at NBC, like she got her daughter Chelsea.

Why are we sending this needy horde of illegal immigrants to struggling middle-class neighborhoods? Why are they being sent only to red States? Because this is all part of Obama’s purposeful plan to destroy America.

Let’s turn the tables. Let’s bus them to the elite, snobby liberal towns. If you liberals like illegals so much, you take care of them.

While we’re at it, let’s demand they go to school at elite private schools. Start with Sidwell Friends School, where Sasha and Malia attend school. Let’s see how Michelle Obama reacts when her precious daughters come home with lice, or cough with TB, or party with tattooed gangbangers from El Salvador.

There’s the ticket. It’s time to turn the tables. Let the wealthy liberals who support Obama and weep for illegal immigrants practice what they preach. It’s time to send the illegal crisis to the doors of Beverly Hills and Georgetown.

That’s how you turn around the murder of the middle class and take back our country.

I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty.  See you next week. God bless America.





Obama Is At The Center Of A Massive Fraud To Ensure That The American Middle-Class Can’t Survive Without Becoming Dependent On Government
Obamacare’s real objective is to make the middle class poor & dependent on government through higher taxes & higher premiums; environmental regulations & green energy’s real objective is bankrupting the middle class by tripling utility bills, gas bills & grocery bills; immigration reform’s real objective is to create 12 million new low-wage employees & Democrat voters and depress middle-class wages for generations to come; higher taxes’ real objective is starving the biggest donors [the middle class] to conservative causes & candidates. Meanwhile, the economy goes to hell as liar Obama says things are getting better: the GDP for the 1st quarter was one of the worst in history, for the 1st time in decades more businesses are closing than starting up, record numbers are not in the workforce & getting entitlement checks — and Obama is loving your misery!


Obama Is At The Center Of A Massive Fraud To Ensure That The American Middle-Class Can’t Survive Without Becoming Dependent On Government

What Is The Murder Of The Middle Class?

July 17, 2014 by Wayne Allyn Root — Personal Liberty Digest

Watch the video here — http://personalliberty.com/murder-middle-class/ — or read the text of it below:

The greatest nation in world history is being destroyed, plundered and looted by the premeditated murder of the middle class. This is no accident, mistake or coincidence. This is a purposeful plan. This is the boldest, grandest criminal conspiracy in world history.

Although the man at the center of this massive world-class fraud is Barack Obama, there are many moving parts and co-conspirators. These include famous billionaire businessmen, corporate CEOs, the Federal Reserve, Wall Street bankers, central bankers, government employee unions, the Internal Revenue Service, the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Security Agency, the Bar Association, assorted communists and America-haters, and even some well-known D.C. establishment Republicans. It’s quite a shocking list of conspirators.

Lies and fraud are at the center of this murder of the middle class. Obama and various big-government politicians need to distract the middle class from their real agenda. Lies are their weapon of mass distraction.

So they claim Obamacare is about "saving the sick and uninsured," when the real objective is income redistribution (through higher taxes and higher premiums) to make the middle class poor and dependent on government.

They claim environmental regulations and green energy will save us from global warming, when the real objective is bankrupting the middle class by tripling utility bills, gas bills and grocery bills.

They claim immigration reform is about "protecting innocent children," when the real objective is to create 12 million new low-wage employees in the labor force, depress middle-class wages for generations to come, create 12 million future Democratic voters and assign all of them lawyers at the expense of middle-class taxpayers to enrich the Bar Association, the biggest donor to the Democratic Party.

They claim higher taxes are to "create equality," when the real objective is income redistribution and starving the biggest donors to conservative causes and candidates: small business and the middle class.

They claim higher education spending is "for the kids," when the real objective is enriching teachers unions so they can funnel hundreds of millions of dollars back to Democratic politicians.

They claim bailing out General Motors was to "save jobs," when the real goal was saving bloated pensions for auto union members, whose unions kicked back hundreds of millions of dollars to Democratic politicians.

The Fed claims quantitative easing is "to save the economy," when the real goal was making crony capitalist Warren Buffett $12.7 billion richer last year — while the children and unborn grandchildren of middle-class taxpayers owe back $17 trillion in debt used to fund a fixed craps game on Wall Street.

It’s always about lying to cover up the real agenda of murdering the middle class; redistributing wealth; making it impossible for small business to compete with big business; rewarding lobbyists, lawyers and crony capitalists; keeping politicians in office for life; and putting big government in control of our every move.

But the biggest lie of all is when politicians like Obama claim: "It’s all OK. Things are getting better. We’re in a recovery. Look away; there’s nothing to see here."

It’s not OK. I was just notified by my health insurance company that my family’s policy has been canceled. When Obama was elected, my bill was $500 per month. Today, it’s $1,700 per month. But now, my family will have no insurance at all because of Obamacare. Tens of millions of middle-class Americans will soon receive the same notice. This is no mistake. This was premeditated fraud upon the middle class.

My grocery bills have skyrocketed. How about yours? My electric bills are at all-time highs. How about yours? Gas prices have doubled since Obama became President. How can middle-class people survive without becoming dependent on government? Ah, that’s the point.

All this occurs while the economy is in crisis and collapse. The gross domestic product for the first quarter was negative 2.9 percent — one of the worst showings in history — six years after Obama’s trillion-dollar stimulus promised to "save" the economy. That stimulus went to Obama’s voters (the poor) and Obama’s donors (the super rich). But the bill (in the form of debt) goes to the middle class for decades to come.

No, things are not all right. Here are just a few of the facts that support that the middle class is being murdered:

• China is set to pass America as the world’s No. 1 economy based on consumer spending this year. It will be the first time since 1872 that America has not been the No. 1 economy in the world.

• For the first time in history, America’s middle class isn’t No. 1 in the world. Canada’s middle class has passed us.

• For the first time in American history, more businesses are closing each day than starting up.

• There are now 70 percent more Americans collecting entitlement checks than working in the private sector (148 million "takers" versus 86 million "makers"), a fact provided by the U.S. Census Bureau.

• The average full-time male employee now earns less (adjusted for inflation) than 40 years ago.

20 percent of U.S. families don’t have a single member who is employed.

• Record numbers of Americans are not in the workforce (more than 92 million).

• The number of working-age Americans without a job increased by about 10 million in Obama’s first five years as President. That means each and every year of Obama’s Presidency, 2 million more Americans disappeared from the workforce.

• America’s second largest employer is a temp agency.

70 percent of Americans believe we are still in the middle of the economic crisis or that the worst is yet to come. And they are correct.

There is no doubt the great American middle class is being murdered. We must have the courage to save the middle class and preserve the American dream. This fight is just getting started. Get informed and join the battle.

See you next week. God bless America and save us from the murder of the middle class.





Obama Flaunts His Abuse Of Power In The Faces Of The American People And Dares Us To Stop Him From Using It To Destroy Our Country: Let's shut-down and shut-up the big mouth bully with one of the most complete, effectual and simple weapons available in our Constitution
For 5 years Obama has used executive action to change & create his own laws, and excuse himself from enforcing statues he is sworn to uphold. All legislation permitting the Federal government to raise taxes or to spend money must originate in the House of Representatives. It's just this simple: If the House won't authorize it, the President can't spend it. The House of Representatives doesn't need a decision by the Supreme Court, or a vote in the U.S. Senate, to bring a halt to Obama's usurpation of power. It can do it by simply refusing to pay for it. The White House is using billions of our tax dollars to carry out Obama's goal to wreck this country. Shut-down and shut-up big mouth bully Obama & the left! — Defund them!


Obama Flaunts His Abuse Of Power In The Faces Of The American People And Dares Us To Stop Him From Using It To Destroy Our Country: Let's shut-down and shut-up the big mouth bully with one of the most complete, effectual and simple weapons available in our Constitution

Stopping This Imperial President

July 10, 2014 by Chip Wood -- Personal Liberty Digest  

Congratulations, liberty lovers! Your efforts to expose the disastrous policies and unConstitutional usurpations of power by the Barack Obama Administration are definitely paying off.

The three key fronts where these battles are being fought are in Congress, in the courts, and in public opinion. And I'm happy to report that in the past couple of weeks, we've scored some significant gains in all three of them.

Let's begin today's analysis with public opinion, which has begun to turn decisively in our favor. The immigration crisis, with tens of thousands of children pouring across our southern border, is just the latest example of the Obama Administration's stunning incompetence¡­ or worse.

Add to that the deceit and cover-up about what happened in Benghazi, Libya; the scandal over National Security Agency spying on its own citizens; and the Internal Revenue Service targeting of conservative groups. It's no wonder more and more Americans are ready to shout: "Enough!"

Of course the public is fed up with this Administration's refusal to protect our borders. What else would you expect? Every night, the TV news programs show more and more children pouring into this country, overflowing what facilities we have, with thousands being transported (at taxpayer expense) to other parts of the country.

If the Obama Administration won't protect our borders, how can we trust it to do anything else right when it comes to stopping this illegal invasion? The answer, of course, is that we cannot.

Obama's reputation is now in such tatters that in the latest Quinnipiac University national poll, he was rated as the worst President since World War II.

That's right. In a survey of registered voters taken during the last week of June, Obama ranked ahead of George W. Bush, Jimmy Carter and Richard Nixon as the worst President in the past 70 years.

A here's a real shocker: 45 percent of the respondents said that the country would have been better off if Mitt Romney had won the Presidency in 2012, while only 38 percent said it would be worse off. It should come as no surprise that Republicans and Democrats were sharply divided here, with Republicans choosing Romney by 84 percent to 5 percent and Democrats endorsing the President 74 percent to 10 percent. The biggest switch came among Independents, who this time around favored Romney by 47 percent to 33 percent. Too bad they didn't do that when they voted two years ago!

Some 54 percent of those polled said that the Obama Administration is not competent to run the government, while just 44 percent said it is. The President's approval rating was stalled at 40 percent in the survey, barely above his all-time low of 38 percent back in December 2013.

But public opinion isn't the only area where Obama has suffered some serious setbacks. He's also lost some decisive contests in the U.S. Supreme Court. In four recent decisions the Obama Administration is 0 for 4. In two of them, the justices voted unanimously against the White House. That means the former professor of Constitutional law is batting 0 for 18. Even the two justices he appointed agreed that his unConstitutional usurpations of power had to be curtailed.

Now it looks as though an even bigger challenge may be mounted to the President's illegal actions. Here's how House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) described the strategy in an article he wrote for CNN:

Every member of Congress swore an oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. So did President Barack Obama.

But too often over the past five years, the President has circumvented the American people and their elected representatives through executive action, changing and creating his own laws, and excusing himself from enforcing statues he is sworn to uphold -- at times even boasting about this willingness to do it, as if daring the American people to stop him.

Who can disagree with Boehner's accusations? Yet as the Speaker pointed out, the President's response was an arrogant, dismissive rejoinder: "So sue me."

Well, actually, Mr. President, that's exactly what Boehner said the House is going to do: "That's why, later this month, we will bring legislation to the House floor that would authorize the House of Representatives to file suit in an effort to compel President Obama to follow his oath of office and faithfully execute the laws of our country."

Frankly, I don't have much hope that such a lawsuit will succeed in forcing the President to change his ways. First of all, with all that Obama and his lawyers can do to challenge and delay such an effort, will it even be decided by the Supreme Court before the President's term of office is over?

And that's even assuming the Nation's highest court would agree with the House position, which I'm not sure is the case. Heck, if Chief Justice John Roberts could twist the Constitution enough to declare that the Affordable Care Act was Constitutional because it was a tax, who knows what he might decide here?

There is a better solution -- one that doesn't depend on a challenge slowly wending its way through the courts. And that is for the House of Representatives to wield what James Madison, the chief architect of the Constitution, called "the most complete and effectual weapon with which any constitution can arm the immediate representatives of the people."

The quotation is from "Federalist No. 58." Madison was referring to the fact that all legislation permitting the Federal government to raise taxes or to spend money must originate in the House of Representatives. It's just this simple: If the House won't authorize it, the President can't spend it.

The House of Representatives doesn't need a decision by the Supreme Court, or a vote in the U.S. Senate, to bring a halt to Obama's usurpation of power. It can do it by simply refusing to pay for it. Or as Madison put it, this is the proper way "for obtaining a redress of every grievance, and for carrying into effect every just and salutary measure."

Every great battle needs a battle cry. I want to propose one here: Defund the left!

Actually, this isn't a new slogan; I heard it for the first time nearly 40 years ago, when conservatives tried to stop the Richard Nixon Administration from paying for leftist agitators to "organize" the poor.

The White House is using billions of our tax dollars to carry out Obama's goal to "transform" this country. One of the best ways to help prevent the Administration's success is to take away its funds.

Defund the left! Let's demand that the House of Representatives start doing it now.

Until next time, keep some powder dry.

--Chip Wood





Obama, The Master Of Shyster-Disaster, “Makes Lies Sound Truthful And Murder Respectable, And Gives An Appearance of Solidity To Pure Wind”
Political speech is deadly & dangerous and is specifically created to be repeated over and over by the elites in order to dumb us down and create a conditioned response. The process of dumbing down and the conditioning of the mind to create a nation of good, obedient subjects loyal and subservient to political authority begins early on. We are now several generations into the plan by the elites to create a Nation of state-worshiping ignoramuses taught pseudo-history and inculcated with a loyalty to and dependence upon big government. An army of journalists is eager to spread Obama’s lies and half-truths because that ensures them their seats inside the Obama Administration’s halls of power. Politicians, like Obama, have learned that the more lies they tell, the more lies we believe. And the more lies we believe, the more dependent we become.


Obama, The Master Of Shyster-Disaster, “Makes Lies Sound Truthful And Murder Respectable, And Gives An Appearance of Solidity To Pure Wind”

The Magical World Of Political Speech

June 2, 2014 by Bob Livingston — Personal Liberty Digest

"Political language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind." – George Orwell

I keep the above George Orwell quote near me at all times. It serves as a reminder to me to decipher political speech whenever I see or hear it.

Political speech contains magical properties. It mesmerizes the masses because it is more illusory than a David Copperfield grand finale.

But political speech is dangerous. While it sounds innocuous, it is as deadly as a bear trap hidden beneath the leaves or a siren singing her song. It can grab you suddenly, or it can ensnare you subtly. Either way, you learn too late that you have been conned and there is no escape.

The magic of political speech is not happenstance. There are change agents at work in the inner sanctums of power whose job it is to create special words and phrases that are used in political speech. Those words and phrases are repeated over and over by the elites in order to dumb us down and create a conditioned response.

The process of dumbing down and the conditioning of the mind to create a nation of good, obedient subjects loyal and subservient to political authority and to the legitimacy of the political order begins early on. We are now several generations into the plan by the elites to create a Nation of state-worshiping ignoramuses taught pseudo-history and inculcated with a loyalty to and dependence upon big government. For many — if not most — of the Nation’s young people below the age of 25, government provided them with most of their meals while the majority of their days were spent submitting to government authority figures (teachers/principals/school officers) in rigid, structured environments that dissuade original thought.

Also aiding the elites and politicians in this effort is an army of "journalists" who never stray far from the official line of the State apparatus. They are eager to spread their lies and half-truths because that ensures them their seats near (or even inside, in the case of the Barack Obama Administration) the halls of power. On that rare occasion one of them strays too far from the party line, retribution is swift and harsh (see Helen Thomas and Sharyl Attkisson). This discourages dissent.

Politicians have learned that the more lies they tell, the more lies we believe. And the more lies we believe, the more dependent we become. Conversely, the fewer myths, lies and deceptions we succumb to, the less dependent we are and, therefore, the more liberty we enjoy.

I long ago learned the power of propaganda. I have watched as otherwise intelligent and thoughtful people have had their minds so manipulated by political speech that they acted contrary to their own best interests without a second thought. It seems that organized and sophisticated propaganda is able to operate outside the threshold of intelligence. In other words, without some imperative to trigger inquiry, very intelligent people buy into lies and myths the same as the general population. The lies and myths then become conventional wisdom. The human mind rarely accepts a challenge to conventional wisdom.

When confronted with a challenge to the established belief system, the mind closes off. When this happens, the individual employs avoidance behavior, writes off the new knowledge as conspiracy theory and labels it as kooky, insane or stupid. The information is then dismissed, never to be considered again, even when the facts support the new knowledge. Psychologists call this quirk of human nature cognitive dissonance. It means the rejection of information not in harmony with previous beliefs.

The esoteric purpose of propaganda is to extract wealth and labor illegally as concealed involuntary servitude or to steal the people’s liberty right out from under them, and even have the populace to thank the thieves for doing so, especially if it is done under the guise of keeping the people "safe" or to "save the children" from some danger, real or imagined. Those who use propaganda to persuade the populace against their best interests create myths and sell them as benefits.

The elites also use distractions for this purpose. These distractions serve to draw the people’s attention away from the important issues and focus it on the mundane and the trivial, much as the illusionist uses sleight of hand. These distractions can be events that occur naturally or by chance, which are then seized upon by the elites. But sometimes the distractions are artificial creations — also called "false flag events" — designed and triggered for the specific purpose of refocusing the attention of the populace. (Bill Clinton’s bombing of a Sudanese aspirin factory at the time of his deposition in the Paula Jones case and at the peak of the Monica Lewinsky scandal is a prime example.)

Often, these distractions serve a dual purpose. For instance, the callous and senseless murder of six people by the mentally depraved Elliot Rodger on May 23 has mesmerized the populace. It has created some distraction away from the burgeoning Veterans Affairs scandal, the Internal Revenue Service scandal, the Benghazi scandal and the ongoing collapse of the economy and Obamacare. But more sinister is its use by the gun controllers and hoplophobes to once again attempt to advance their assault on the 2nd Amendment.

Congressman Steny Hoyer employed classic political speech (or doublethink) in announcing that Democrats will try to steal more 2nd Amendment liberties by expanding background checks on weapons purchases through an amendment to an upcoming bill. While acknowledging that expanded background checks would have made no difference in the Rodger case, Hoyer said Congress must do something. (By the way, half of Rodger’s victims were killed with knives and five of the 13 injured were struck with his car. Curiously, Hoyer did not call for background checks on knife and car purchases.)

There is nothing lawmakers love more than making laws, even when they know their laws won’t accomplish their stated purpose. This is particularly true of those laws that take more authority for the state, or if they enrich the fascist system. For lawmakers, the "unintended consequences" of their laws are just like gravy, because then they get to pass more laws to correct the unintended consequences. This, of course, leads to more "unintended consequences" and the passage of more laws.

Obama is a master of classic political speech. In a political fundraiser in Chicago last week, he moved from blaming George W. Bush for his problems and put the onus on the Founding Fathers.

According to Obama, he is unable to move his agenda forward because the Constitution requires each State be represented by two Senators. "Obviously, the nature of the Senate means that California has the same number of seats as Wyoming. That puts us at a disadvantage."

This, of course, is nonsensical on its face and is pure argle-bargle. Democrats control the Senate 53-45 with one socialist and one independent, both of whom vote with Democrats. However, it reveals something of Obama’s true nature. That is, he wishes to be a dictator and he detests the republican system of government our Founders gave us, but which we have almost totally lost to fascism.

But of course, in the world of political speech, such tommyrot as this is accepted as great political philosophy and applauded by the sychophants and toadies.

Certainly, the current regime has not cornered the market on magical political speech and propaganda; but it has more weapons in its arsenal than any before it.





Is Obama A Muslim Destroying America With Communist Principles?: Obama’s War Against Coal Will Cripple The USA’s Energy Independence, Eliminate More Than 3.5 Million Jobs Through 2030, And Leave America In Critical Need Of Muslim Dirty Oil And Influence
Coal provides America with 70% of its electricity and America has 1,000 years of coal reserves. New Obama rules will suppress average annual coal production by $51 billion and eliminate more than 3.5 million jobs through 2030. Include the jobs that America will lose when Obama says no to the Keystone Pipeline, and America is looking at the loss of 4 million jobs. America will be forced to meet its energy needs from the Persian Gulf, that bleak desert that spawned Islam and, likely, Obama’s prophet, Muhammad. Young Americans will die, not to fight a clear and present danger to the USA but because their war is one fought for a President who is aiming to hamstring America’s future while engineering a renaissance for Islam.


Is Obama A Muslim Destroying America With Communist Principles?: Obama’s War Against Coal Will Cripple The USA’s Energy Independence, Eliminate More Than 3.5 Million Jobs Through 2030, And Leave America In Critical Need Of Muslim Dirty Oil And Influence

Obama’s War On American Coal Reveals Our Manchurian President

June 25, 2014 by John Myers — Personal Liberty Digest

"This isn’t an election; this is a coup." — Ben Marco, as portrayed by Denzel Washington, in "The Manchurian Candidate"

President Barack Obama is with one hand kneecapping domestic coal production and with the other hand forming an alliance with Iran, America’s most dangerous adversary in the Mideast and a country that covets nuclear weapons and Mideast domination. Yet Obama and Iran’s Ayatollah are working together in partnership to stabilize the Shiite government of Iraq, which, if they are successful, will secure crude oil from that region and re-establish Tehran’s dominance.

Presidents have been making deals with Mideast dictators for decades, so in itself there may be nothing wrong with Obama’s actions. It seems so clearly wrong that as Obama orders military advisers back into Iraq and prepares airstrikes, his Administration is issuing proclamations against domestic coal producers, which harvest America’s richest energy resource and provide tens of thousands of jobs that are desperately needed.

If one didn’t know better, one might think this is all part of our President’s plan to cripple U.S. energy independence, a plan to leave America in critical need of Mideast influence and crude.

King Coal Cut Down By Obama

Coal provides America with 70 percent of its electricity. You might think that coal would be valued by Obama because it provides so many well-paying jobs and that it would be the natural energy source for electricity to charge electric cars. (What never seems to compute to so many of the idiot Greens is that there has to be a basis for the charge for the electric car and that electricity, like everything else, isn’t free.)

The United States is the Saudi Arabia of coal, with 1,000 years of coal reserves. Coal can generate the power for all things, even the grand ambition of Obama and the Greens for a million electric cars by the end of the decade. But electric cars need to be charged, and the only energy that is readily available is coal.

I recently watched Bill Maher earlier this month after the Obama Administration’s Environmental Protection Agency announced what it calls the "Clean Power Program," as well as new regulations planned against coal generators. Maher’s guest was EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy.

MAHER: "Last week [the EPA] announced, I think it was called the ‘Clean Power Program.’ Some people called it a war on coal. I hope it is a war on coal. Is it?"

McCARTHY: "Actually, EPA is all about fighting against pollution and fighting for public health. That’s exactly what this is."

So, yes, Team Obama is going to war against American coal, while establishing militarily and diplomatic ties with Iran to combat the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS).

Coal power plants must bend to new rules by the EPA. There is a four-month comment period on the dictates that impact coal, coal jobs and coal States. Of course, the Greens have wasted no time weighing in, telling Obama that slamming dirty coal is something they support.

Not all Americans agree the Obama Administration has tried to tiptoe around the fact McCarthy declared a war on coal for her President. And an op-ed penned by Senators John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) and Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.) and published by The Wall Street Journal pointed out that not all Americans are ready to jump on board with regard to Obama’s war on coal.

The "announcement [about the proposed power plant rules] is a dagger in the heart of the American middle class, and to representative Democracy itself," said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY).

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce also weighed in on coal power plant restrictions, saying, "An avalanche of environmental regulations has made it increasingly difficult to build and develop in the United States."

An independent study by IHS Global concludes the new rules threaten to suppress average annual U.S. gross domestic product by $51 billion and lead to an average of 224,000 fewer U.S. jobs every year through 2030.

Other studies on coal restrictions have predicted that as many as half a million jobs will be lost. Include the tens of thousands of jobs that America will lose when Obama says no to the Keystone Pipeline, and America is looking at the loss of nearly 1 million high-paying jobs, all to prevent what is still a theory of man-made global warming.

America’s Real Enemy

There should be the bigger question: Where is America going to get affordable energy if domestic coal faces restrictions and Alberta oil sands are blocked? The truth is America will be forced to meet its energy needs from the Persian Gulf, that bleak desert that spawned Islam and, likely, Obama’s prophet, Muhammad.

Never mind that it is the worst region in the world to count on for anything other than tribal war and genocide. Remember, in the 1970s the Mideast instituted two oil embargos against the United States. The Mideast founded OPEC to bleed as much money from the West as possible for crude. And the Mideast is and has been for 50 years a breeding ground for terrorists that want desperately to kill Americans, Jews and each other.

Greens, pay attention: If global warming really does exist and if hydrocarbons are part of the reason why it exists, then Mideast crude is also at the heart of your fixation over carbon dioxide. When you get a barrel of oil stamped "Mideast Crude," it doesn’t mean it burns clean.

Factor in all the carbon and other toxic pollutants created by America’s intervention in this region; it is likely they are more harmful to the global environment than coal that is currently burned in North America. Let’s not forget that for nearly a decade the U.S. used depleted uranium in Iraq and Afghanistan both in ammunition and armor. If the environmentalist’s true goal is to protect human and animal life, here is a suggestion: Have your President stop using it in his arsenal.

According to Wikipedia, the chemical toxicity of depleted uranium is a million times greater than its radiological hazard. Other chemicals being used by America’s military are not doing "Mother Earth" any good either.

Yet I expect nary a complaint about depleted uranium or any of the chemical weapons used as more Mideast wars are prosecuted to secure future "dirty" Arab oil. Nor will there be a mention of the lost lives of young Americans who died not to fight a clear and present danger to the United States but because their war is one fought for a Green President who is aiming to hamstring America’s future while engineering a renaissance for Islam. So please tell me: Who is America’s real enemy?

Yours in good times and bad,

–John Myers





King Obama Believes That He Can Do Anything That He Wants To Do And Get Away With It: 5 ISLAMIST mass-murdering terrorists are “illegally” exchanged for one ISLAMIST sympathizing “deserter”, who has an ISLAMIST converted father, by Obama — a probable ISLAMIST himself
The Taliban view the prisoner exchange as a “great victory.” A Taliban leader declared, “We shall thank almighty for this great victory. The sacrifice of our Mujahedin have resulted in the release of our senior leaders from the hand of the enemy.” Obama has emboldened our enemies, discouraged our service members and increased the danger to every American citizen. In saner times, this would be enough to start rumblings about impeachment. But, of course, we aren’t living in sane times. The Federal government has become one vast insane asylum — with the most dangerous inmates running the show. Are there still enough patriots left who want to kick ass? We’ll see this November.


King Obama Believes That He Can Do Anything That He Wants To Do And Get Away With It: 5 ISLAMIST mass-murdering terrorists are “illegally” exchanged for one ISLAMIST sympathizing “deserter”, who has an ISLAMIST converted father, by Obama — a probable ISLAMIST himself

Obama’s Illegal Prisoner Exchange

June 5, 2014 by Chip Wood — Personal Liberty Digest

The prisoner swap Barack Obama just arranged may be the stupidest decision to come out of the White House in the past six years.

But it’s even worse than that. It’s put every member of our armed forces at even greater risk. And by emboldening the terrorists who believe they are waging a holy war against us, it’s increased the danger that every citizen of this country could become the victim of a hijacking, a hostage-taking or another form of terrorist attack.

Brad Thor, a best-selling author with deep ties in military and intelligence circles, didn’t mince words when he described the effects of Obama’s actions. "The President has just put a target on the back of all Americans," he warned in an appearance on Greta van Susteren’s FOX News show. Thor said that our diplomats and American civilians traveling abroad are now in even greater danger of being taken hostage than our military. "Every American should be terrified by that," he said.

Needless to say, the Taliban view what has happened as a "great victory." Taliban leader Mullah Omar declared, "We shall thank almighty for this great victory. The sacrifice of our Mujahedin have resulted in the release of our senior leaders from the hand of the enemy."

In the face of a growing backlash against the prisoner exchange, guess what the Administration did? It sent Susan Rice, of Benghazi talking points fame, back on the Sunday morning talk shows. And once again, the lady told a whopper. Appearing on ABC News’ "This Week," Rice said, "Sgt. Bergdahl wasn’t simply a hostage, he was an American prisoner of war, captured on the battlefield."

Turns out that this is nowhere near the truth. Bergdahl wasn’t captured on the battlefield, he walked away from his post. Several of the men who were stationed with him say he was a deserter. The New York Times reports that he "left behind a note in his tent saying he had become disillusioned with the Army, did not support the American mission in Afghanistan and was leaving to start a new life."

Doesn’t sound much like an American hero, does he? But wait, it gets worse. Prior to leaving his post, Bergdahl sent an email to his parents in which he said, "I am ashamed to be an American. And the title of US soldier is just the lie of fools. … The horror that is America is disgusting."

Wow! Sure doesn’t sound like someone you’d want to risk your life rescuing, does it? But it turns out, that is exactly what our troops in the area were ordered to do. After Bergdahl walked away from his post in June 2009, the Army mounted several operations to try to find him. At least six soldiers were killed during those efforts.

Sgt. Matt Vierkant, one of the soldiers who served in Bergdahl’s platoon, was interviewed by CNN. His disgust and anger were obvious: "I was pissed off then and I am even more so now with everything going on," he said. And he added, "Bowe Bergdahl deserted during a time of war and his fellow Americans lost their lives searching for him." Vierkant says that he wants to see Bergdahl face a military trial for desertion under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

Army 2nd Lt. Darryn Andrews was one of the soldiers killed while hunting for Bergdahl. He was shot to death in an ambush while on patrol in an area near where Bergdahl vanished. When she learned of the exchange that gained Bergdahl’s release, Andrews’ mother told Army Times:

"It gets really hurtful when I think, this guy was worth my son’s life? My son who was patriotic? Who was a true soldier? Who defended his country with his life? That guy was worth that? I don’t think so."

Hard to disagree with her, isn’t it?

Bergdahl was a private first class when he disappeared five years ago. Since then, he was promoted to the rank of staff sergeant, because that is what would have happened had he remained on duty, re-enlisted and continued to serve honorably — three assumptions that now seem to be very questionable. Nevertheless, that is why he is referred to now as Sgt. Bergdahl, not Pfc. Bergdahl.

Faced with questions about Bergdahl’s actions, Gen. Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said that Bergdahl will be disciplined if the Army finds any evidence of misconduct. "Our Army’s leaders will not look away from misconduct if it occurred," Dempsey promised. But he added that Bergdahl must be regarded as innocent until he is proven guilty. And that in any case, the military will continue to care for him and his family, as of course it should.

Make no mistake about it, the five prisoners that Obama released are all serious bad guys. Two years ago, James Clapper, who was the Director of National Intelligence at the time, described all five terrorists as "too dangerous to release." But things are apparently different now.

The United States has had a long-standing policy, respected by both Republican and Democrat Administrations, of never negotiating with terrorists. Obama has tossed that one on the scrap pile.

The President has said for years that he wants to close the U.S. Navy facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and transfer the terrorists who are being held there to prisons in this country. Back in 2009, the Senate voted 90-6 in opposition to the Obama plan.

Last year, Congress passed a law demanding that the White House notify Congress 30 days in advance of any plans to transfer any of the jihadists being held at Guantanamo. Obama signed the measure, but at the same time he issued a signing statement saying that that part of the law was probably unConstitutional and that he didn’t feel obligated to obey it.

This was a 180-degree switch from what candidate Obama said when he was first running for the Presidency. Back in 2007, he was quick to denounce his predecessor, George W. Bush, for issuing such disclaimers. And he promised, "We’re not going to use signing statements as a way of doing an end run around Congress."

But as I said, that was then and this is now. Now, Obama needed to do something to get the Veterans Affairs scandal out of the headlines and off the front page. What better way to do it than to bring home an American prisoner of war?

A year ago, White House press secretary Jay Carney was asked about rumors of a possible prisoner swap using Guantanamo detainees. Here’s what he said on June 21, 2013: "As we have long said, however, we would not make any decisions about transfer of any detainees without consulting with Congress and without doing so in accordance with U.S. law."

Guess what? Turns out that was another White House whopper.

In a classic example of too little, too late, the White House decided to call some key lawmakers this past Monday — two days after announcing the prisoner exchange — to apologize for the "oversight" in not notifying them sooner. Time will tell if this is enough to appease Senators Diane Feinstein (D-Calif.) and Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.), their parties’ leaders on the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence.

By his actions, Obama has emboldened our enemies, discouraged our service members and increased the danger to every American citizen. Thor said he has put a target on the back of every one of us.

In saner times, this would be enough to start rumblings about impeachment. But, of course, we aren’t living in sane times. The Federal government has become one vast insane asylum — with the most dangerous inmates running the show.

Let’s hope there are still enough patriots left who want to make some big changes in this sorry situation. We’ll have a chance to do so this November.

Until next time, keep some powder dry.

–Chip Wood





Obama Conceals His Traitorous Guilt With Yet Another Media-Ignored Scam: Benghazi terrorist mastermind given Miranda rights on American soil to silence him about Obama’s guilt in the Benghazi attack
Benghazi terrorist mastermind Ahmed Abu Khattala — (enjoyed life in plain view of U.S. special forces for “20 months”). Suddenly, Obama ordered his capture at the exact moment he needed to change the headlines to hide that the USA is in disarray & decline. Then Obama ordered him to be put on trial in America — and not imprisoned in Guantanamo — so his Miranda rights could silence his testimony about his knowledge of Obama’s fingerprints being at the scene of the crime in Benghazi — testimony that Benghazi was a terrorist attack from Day One, that no protest of a movie was ever involved, that his terrorists used weapons supplied to Libyan rebels by the Obama Administration to kill our own brave men, and that even the terrorists were shocked that Obama never sent a rescue mission.


Obama Conceals His Traitorous Guilt With Yet Another Media-Ignored Scam: Benghazi terrorist mastermind given Miranda rights on American soil to silence him about Obama’s guilt in the Benghazi attack

The Greatest Scam Artist In History

June 20, 2014 by Wayne Allyn Root — Personal Liberty Digest

Watch the video here — http://personalliberty.com/greatest-scam-artist-history/ — or read the text of it below

I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. The greatest scam artist in history has scammed America — again. A terrorist mastermind gets Miranda rights on American soil, while a U.S. Marine hero has no rights in Mexico. That’s par for the course in Barack Obama’s America.

Look around. America is in free fall. The Internal Revenue Service scandal is exploding: The IRS says "the dog ate Lois Lerner’s emails." The very evidence that could lead to the impeachment of the President has disappeared into cyberspace. At the same moment, Obama is still taking heat for releasing five Jihadist mass murderers in a swap for a deserter. At the same moment, Iraq is crumbling. Everything we fought for, the trillion dollars we spent "liberating" Iraq, the many brave men who died… it’s all being erased as Iraq falls to the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS). Soon, Baghdad will fall; the writing is already on the wall. This is the greatest foreign policy embarrassment in U.S. history. Then there’s the Veterans Affairs scandal. Under Obama’s leadership, the Nation is in crisis and dramatic decline.

So what does the greatest scam artist to ever occupy the White House do? He pulls out the WMD (weapons of mass distraction). He "wags the dog" to distract the masses. He gives permission for U.S. special forces to capture the architect of Benghazi — a terrorist hiding in plain sight for the past 20 months. Presto. The Kool-Aid drinking mainstream media call Obama "a hero." Amazing. No one can be this dumb, can he?

But the scam is much deeper than it appears. The capture of Benghazi terrorist mastermind Ahmed Abu Khattala isn’t just a cover-up for the PR mess Obama is in. The capture itself is the biggest scam of all.

First, we let this Benghazi butcher enjoy life in plain view for 20 months. Suddenly, Obama decides the time is right to capture him — right at the exact moment Obama needed to change the headlines. Pure bread and circuses. I’m surprised he didn’t just call for the start of the "Hunger Games."

But the second part of Obama’s scam is far more dastardly. Obama is sending the terrorist mastermind to the U.S. instead of Guantanamo. He will be read his Miranda rights, like any other American citizen innocent until proven guilty. Why? Guantanamo was built for exactly this kind of unique situation, to house "the worst of the worst" enemy combatants and to interrogate them without the need for Miranda rights.

This scam was all planned out for months — 20 months, to be exact. Obama wanted the perfect timing — to hide a country in disarray and decline. And he wanted the perfect circumstances — the man with the knowledge of what happened at Benghazi protected by Miranda.

Abu Khattala is the definition of a "high-value target." He can put Obama’s fingerprints at the scene of the crime. He can testify that Benghazi was a terrorist attack from Day One, that no protest of a movie was ever involved. He can testify that his terrorists used weapons supplied to Libyan rebels by the Obama Administration to kill our own brave men. He can testify that even the terrorists were shocked that Obama never sent a rescue mission. He can say: "We all expected to die on a suicide mission, but your President was too weak to fight back. Because of Obama, this was a great victory; and we lived to brag about it."

So how do you shut up the terrorist mastermind? You read him his Miranda rights. You tell him he has the right to "lawyer up." You protect him from enhanced interrogation. On American soil we can’t touch him. No Jack Bauer-style creative interrogation. No loud music. No threats to his family. No nothing. Here it’s just nice questions asked by polite FBI agents who could lose their pensions if they don’t mind their manners.

Here in America a high-profile trial like this will take years to happen — two, or three, or four years. Just enough time that Obama is safely out of office. So even if the terrorist talks at trial, which is unlikely, no one will hear about it until Obama is enjoying life as a billionaire author and global speaker at his Hawaii estate.

This is how you silence a dangerous witness for years. This is how you keep him from ever disclosing the secrets that can bring you down. You bring him to America and give him a team of lawyers. You can bet Obama’s top enforcer, Attorney General Eric Holder, will make sure Abu Khattala has an O.J. Simpson-like "dream team." Game, set, match. The terrorist provides cover for Obama. His capture makes Obama look good. But he’s guaranteed to never talk.

Now compare this situation with our hero Marine being tortured in a Mexican prison. Sgt Andrew Tahmoorisi has been given no Miranda rights. He made a wrong turn at the border and wound up shackled at four points to a bed, while Mexican guards kicked him in the ribs. Then he was denied food and water. Our hero Marine has no rights… for the crime of bad driving. Yet a mass-murdering terrorist mastermind is protected by Miranda rights on American soil.

It’s all going bad, folks.

Obama plays chess at a higher level. The GOP is led by weak-willed cowards and idiots. The Republican leadership is playing checkers… without a board. The greatest scam artist in the history of the White House wins another round.

And the death of America continues unabated.

I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. God bless America.





Will We Ever Stand Up To The Likes of Obama? Most Americans are either too cowardly, too stupid or too doped up on society's opiates to comprehend that we are becoming slaves by a power worse than what King George III subjected the colonists to
In France the government fears the people and in America the people fear the government. Few Presidents have been loathed more than Obama. Many Americans are either fearful to challenge Obama, the Orwellian nightmare of our time, or have been co-opted willfully to support a dark government that spies on the people, engages in wanton spending of the peoples's money and prosecutes foreign wars for selfish ends, against the interest of the people. That mindless pursuits are destroying American traditional values is no concern to the depraved people who hold the reins of power; their control is allowed because the populace is either cowardly or complacent. If it isn't cowardice or pleasure-seeking that enslaves us, perhaps it is simple stupidity.


Will We Ever Stand Up To The Likes of Obama? Most Americans are either too cowardly, too stupid or too doped up on society's opiates to comprehend that we are becoming slaves by a power worse than what King George III subjected the colonists to

Will We Ever Stand Up To The Likes Of Obama?

June 18, 2014 by John Myers -- Personal Liberty Digest

"Do you want to know who you are? Don't ask. Act! Action will delineate and define you." -- Witold Gombrowicz's Diary, translated by Lillian Vallee

It's said that in France the government fears the people and that in America the people fear the government. Not once in the past century has this kind of fear been more palpable than it is under the yoke of the Administration of President Barack Obama.

Few Presidents have been loathed more than Obama. A minority of Americans openly and bitterly complain that Obama is stripping away our Constitutional freedoms and demand political change. A courageous few like whistleblower Edward Snowden risk their freedom and perhaps their lives to obstruct that evil that lies within our Federal government.

The vast majority is either too stupid or too doped up on society's opiates to comprehend that we are becoming slaves by a power worse than what King George III subjected the colonists to. And while liberals continuously bemoan the enslavement and brutalization of Africans, which occurred in the distant past, they turn a blind eye to the growing enslavement that exists now. Few notice the irony that some of it is being carried out by a sitting U.S. President with Kenyan roots.

Many Americans are either fearful to challenge the Orwellian nightmare of our time or have been co-opted willfully to support a dark government that spies on the people, engages in wanton spending of the peoples¡¯ money and prosecutes foreign wars for selfish ends, against the interest of the people. It is in these non-declared wars that America's children are cannon fodder with nary a protest and little organized opposition.

Overcoming Fear And Fighting Back

My life's lesson that came late was don't be bullied. I had been bullied as a sickly, asthmatic child. Because of that experience, I pushed my sons into karate, boxing and wrestling. One of them asked why I didn't box if I thought they should. So I became a regular at the gym, training with and sparring younger men and sometimes decorated national champions.

Whether this scintilla of courage was worth it, I will never know. As far as I know, my children were not bullied. But, then again, they grew up in a different world than I did. What I do remember is that I was afraid when I was sparring, and I could overcome that fear only because I didn't want to be taken advantage of again.

But make no mistake; our government is taking advantage of us. It needs us to shut up and take it so it can pursue its global ambitions, including the jump-starting of what clearly was a lost war that cost $1 trillion in Iraq.

Washington recycles wars the way the movie industry recycles movies. So don't be surprised by another combat operation, whose moniker should be "Iraq III: The Quest for Arab Oil." Most will watch it, and hardly a soul will dare question it. They are a fearful, mindless, subservient majority. Many do it because blind trust of government has been programmed into them by an amoral education system, and the propaganda machinery allows the herd to feed on everything from legalized gambling to mind-altering chemicals.

That mindless pursuits are destroying American traditional values is, at best, no concern to the depraved people who hold the reins of power. And their control is allowed because the populace is either cowardly or complacent.

If a foreign power were to persecute us this way, Americans would rise up and take action. Yet we have a 21st century President -- with roots in Kenya or Connecticut it matters not -- who strips away our liberty while sending our young people to die somewhere where American involvement benefits arms contractors. Seldom is it a foreign enemy that is a clear and present danger. Instead, the enemy comprises leaders who have betrayed the Constitution and the foundation of a free America set forth by the Founding Fathers. Why do we allow this to happen? Are we too afraid or just too damned stupid?

Another Obama Argument For The Habitually Stupid

If it isn't cowardice or pleasure-seeking that enslaves us, perhaps it is simple stupidity. There is a good argument to be made for that, especially when you consider the outlandish comments of Secretary of State John Kerry after the Obama Administration released the Taliban Five in exchange for an allegedly deranged American combat deserter, Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl.

Kerry said the United States has ways of keeping tabs on those terrorists who are now in Qatar. According to Kerry, the prisoner swap was a wise decision because if any or all of these terrorists re-entered the battlefield, the United States can take them out.¡¡

"I am not telling you that they don't have some ability at some point to go back and get involved," said Kerry, bragging about the capacity of the Obama Administration to protect Americans. "But they also have an ability to get killed doing that."

Is it just me, or is this the most asinine argument ever made? If we apply Kerry's logic to World War II, the United States should have released the 450,000 German prisoners of war they captured back to the Nazis, knowing that the Allies could kill them next time. "Here, Hitler. Here is an entire army back."

Yet I can't find any criticism of this in the media. Nowhere did the popular press point out the absurdity of what Kerry said. I ask you why you think this is so. Is it because the media are active in selling anything they are asked to sell by the Obama Administration, or is it because they are obtuse?

Either way, it bodes ill, especially with the U.S. preparing airstrikes on populated sections of Iraq. Only a simpleton could believe this is a tactic to bring a tribal civil war to a peaceful conclusion. Yet it is exactly what the President is going to do, even though this entire mess in the Mideast was caused by the previous Administration, which planned to force American democracy upon resistant Arabs.

And consider this brain twister that somebody in the media should -- but will not -- mention. When America carries out air attacks on the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) inside Iraq, Washington will be supporting Iran's strategic goals. That means that America will, under Obama, become a member of the "axis of evil."

But not one in 100 Americans will even consider this, just as almost none considered President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney were lying when both swore Saddam Hussein was stockpiling weapons of mass destruction -- weapons they said could be targeted on the United States. It would hardly be surprising then that most Americans would in short order be convinced wholeheartedly of the necessity of new military engagements inside Iraq.

Yours in good times and bad,

--John Myers





Why America Has Fallen Into The Hands Of Tyrants Like Obama: A Welfare Society That Has Bred An Army Of Self-Righteous Leeches
There are two great enemies of any liberty-based society: the power-mad oligarchy and the idiots who make their conquests more feasible. Sadly, too many useless Americans are willing to give away everything in the name of comfort, fear or narcissism and have embraced the life of bottom-feeders — a collective of parasites who gorge on the arteries of those who actually make an effort to better their own lives. Not long ago, there was an element of shame when someone played the system for too long and siphoned money through dishonesty and misrepresentation. Today, the welfare society has bred an army of self-righteous leeches: a subculture of overgrown brats who are actually proud to live without working, who are proud to steal from others to sustain themselves, and who brag about their ability to grab entitlements through government over-taxation of hard-workers.


Why America Has Fallen Into The Hands Of Tyrants Like Obama: A Welfare Society That Has Bred An Army Of Self-Righteous Leeches

Idiots Like This Are Why America Fell Into The Hands Of Tyrants

April 8, 2014 by Brandon Smith — Personal Liberty Digest 

When faced with the inevitable destabilization and destruction of one’s country and culture, it is only natural to define and expose the culprit behind the chaos. The liberty movement spends an incredible amount of time and energy unmasking the criminality of international financiers and globalists, but it is important to point out that the power of the elites is entirely dependent on the ignorance and stupidity of the masses. Without a majority of thoroughly foolish Americans, there would be no base of support for the actions of tyrants. Without the mind-boggling superficiality and bias of the average citizen, there would be no fertile ground for the schemes of totalitarians to blossom. Truly, there are two great enemies of any liberty-based society: the power-mad oligarchy and the idiots who make their conquests more feasible.

Is our Nation built upon carefully crafted lies? Yes. Is our political establishment a false paradigm? Yes. Is our public school system corrupt and poisonous? Of course. But are elitists the only source of our despair? No. It is vital that we acknowledge the important part played by biased, selfish, cruel and mentally challenged persons in the destruction of all that is good in this world. There is no power over us but that which we give away; and, sadly, too many useless Americans are willing to give away everything in the name of comfort, fear or narcissism.

Do you want to see the face of this Nation’s decline? Check out the video diary of this woman and understand that there are millions more out there like her:

Melissa Melton of The Daily Sheeple posted the video under the headline "’The Fruits of Socialism’: I Can’t Even Stand to Watch the Rest of this Video."

It is almost impossible to sit through the entirety of the above video. Though I laughed hardily, I have to admit as well that this was a simultaneous source of entertainment and emotional torture.

First, during the full nine minutes of the video, I was praying that the camera view would not drop below shoulder level. Who knows if this woman had enough initiative or sense to put on clothes before filming her own welfare confessions? Being forced to witness 300 pounds of stark-naked, socialist-fed cellulite is not my idea of fun. Secondly, I realize that this pink haired EBT-addicted sasquatch represents a considerable portion of the American public. As much as I despise her, I understand that she is a part of a much larger collective of parasites gorging on the arteries of those who actually make an effort to better their own lives.

I have met hundreds of people who have embraced the life of the bottom-feeder. They are everywhere. They are your neighbors, your acquaintances, your friends, your family, etc. In using the term "bottom-feeder," I am not necessarily referring to people who refuse to work within our current economic climate. I have nothing but respect for those who make the effort to break from the system and go their own way, surviving using methods that violate mainstream taboos and functioning without the aid of a bureaucratic machine. No, a bottom-feeder is someone who uses the system as a weapon to take from others while contributing nothing in return.

Keep in mind that there are nearly 50 million people in America today who rely on government-funded food stamps just to eat. That is a bewildering portion of our population, which will defend the socialization of our country no matter what the consequences.

In the view of the common socialist, it is the responsibility of the working class to give shelter to what I call the "disinterested class," the people who have no inclination to invest in their own futures and who feel that they deserve, for whatever insane reason, the forced charity of others. This may be due to delusions of grandeur like those of the woman above, who thinks her "hobbies" give her artistic license to live on the dime of strangers. Or it may be due to a misplaced sense of expectation — a notion that they reserve the right to have their lives capitalized as if they are precious commodities. As if their existence were assured by some kind of legal mandate.

Not long ago, there was an element of shame when someone played the system for too long and siphoned money through dishonesty and misrepresentation. Today, the welfare society has bred an army of self-righteous leeches: people who are actually proud to live without working, who are proud to steal from others to sustain themselves and who brag about their ability to forage for entitlements through the unsecured avenues of government taxation. Here is yet another example of this attitude on display:

Could it be possible that the existence of the welfare class gives strength and locomotion to the machinations of the aristocracy? Could it be possible that for every person who relies on the system for survival the system fuels its continued dominance? And, if that is the case, would it not benefit the state to engineer economic collapse and conditions of poverty in order to accelerate the socialist condition?

Look at it this way: For tyranny to remain energetic, it must have a growing population of dependent citizens and a growing organization of interdependent economies. The fewer independent people there are, the more real estate tyrants have available to maneuver. This is not to say that every welfare leech contributes directly to totalitarianism. Rather, every welfare leech represents one less person who will stand as an obstacle to the formation of despotism.

Tax-dependent people coalesce into a collectivist hive, an easily enslaved piece of leverage used against independent people as a means to manipulate. When corrupt government confronts us with the argument that more power and more centralization are necessary for the "greater good" of the "greater number," these are the people to whom they are referring. So it behooves us to ask whether the "greater number" are actually worth the sacrifice of money and freedom the government demands.

Are the people featured in the videos above really products of the "greater good," or are they something else?

Is it really our job to support with our tax dollars a subculture of overgrown brats, a subculture that will eventually be used as a bartering chip designed to place us in chains further down the road? Should any of us feel compelled to throw money at a problem that will only cause us more pain in the near future? I have to say that I feel no regret in tossing such people to the curb.

In all honesty, most great revelations in human history and most great changes in social environment are triggered by the efforts of dedicated minorities. Why should the liberty movement continue to perpetuate the myth that the "greater good" of the "greater number" really matters? The mainstream is utterly devoid of value or redemption. The vast majority of Americans (and the majority of most people around the world) are waffling simpletons and spectators hiding in the dark recesses of the modern Colosseum. They exist as nothing but cannon fodder for the elites.

This might sound like a harsh judgment, but I suggest you watch the above videos again. The future we are fighting for likely will not include such people. Their survival through the harshest of times is impossible. Their lack of independence makes their demise inevitable. In the grand scheme of things, I see little utility in attempting to save them. This is why I question any liberty movement proponents who claim that our salvation requires the "awakening" of the mainstream. This goal is not only unattainable, but also a distraction.

As much as the globalists have initiated the pain and suffering of our republic, it has been the dull-witted masses that have allowed the horror to endure. Though our primary mission is to inform, it is also important that we recognize that there are limits to the "reach, teach and inspire" methodology. Those who know will always be in a minority. Those who don’t know will always outnumber us. Perhaps it is time that we stop giving the dregs of the mainstream so much support and attention. Perhaps it is time we stop seeking their favor. Perhaps we should build our own culture, separate, free and industrious; and let them wallow in their own self-created misery. Perhaps it is time for a change in the status quo. For if we allow the culture of entitlement to continue as a mainstay of our Nation and a source of pride for acolytes, then are we any better than they are?

Isn’t it our duty to finally say "no" to those who would pick our pockets and trade off our freedoms in the name of equality and charity? Isn’t it better to end this charade now and struggle through the consequences than it is to continue the socialist lie to the benefit of tyrants?

–Brandon Smith





The Case For Obama’s Impeachment: Why It Should Happen, But Won’t Happen
There is clear & convincing evidence that Barack Obama has on numerous occasions willfully committed treason & high crimes & misdemeanors and should be removed from office. The crimes that led to the impeachment of both Andrew Johnson & Bill Clinton and the resignation of Richard Nixon pale in comparison to Obama’s. However, as long as there is no groundswell of opposition to Omama’s actions from the public, there will be no impeachment. As long as there is not a 2/3’s majority of Republicans in the Senate, there will be no impeachment. But even if Republicans were to come up with a 2/3’s majority, the Republicans would not have the stomach to attempt it because the sycophantic media would gin impeachment up as a racial issue and stir up street riots that would make Watts riots look like a park stroll. The ensuing carnage would likely result in the removal of the entire power structure in Washington.


The Case For Obama’s Impeachment: Why It Should Happen, But Won’t Happen

The Case For Obama’s Impeachment

June 9, 2014 Bob LIvingston — Personal Liberty Digest

There is clear and convincing evidence that President Barack Obama has on numerous occasions willfully committed treason and high crimes and misdemeanors and should be removed from office.

The "crimes" that led to the impeachment of both Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton and the resignation of Richard Nixon pale in comparison to Obama’s. Johnson’s "crimes" were purely political. He favored a policy of benevolent reconciliation with the Southern States following the Civil War. He issued a series of proclamations that directed the Southern States to hold conventions and elections to reform their governments; he attempted to veto a number of bills establishing military districts to oversee the new State governments; he vetoed an incumbent protection act called the Tenure of Office Act; and he fired Secretary of War Edwin Stanton, who was working against him at every turn. Those moves were all contrary to the wishes of the Republicans who controlled both houses of Congress in the aftermath of the war. The impeachment vote in the Senate failed by one vote on all three counts to receive the two-thirds majority necessary to remove Johnson from office.

Clinton was impeached for perjury to a grand jury and obstruction of justice in the Paula Jones sexual harassment suit and the related independent counsel’s investigation in the Monica Lewinsky affair and various other Clinton misdeeds. Forty-five Senators—all of them Republican—voted to remove Clinton from office over the perjury charge. Fifty voted to remove him for obstruction of justice. Though Clinton was clearly guilty, not one Democrat in the Senate voted to impeach. And, in fact, the Senate voted 100-0 to not hear any live witnesses in the trial.

Nixon, of course, resigned a couple of weeks after the House opened its impeachment hearings over his role in the cover-up of the Watergate break-in and other allegations of his misuse of office, the facts of which were just coming to light at the time.

The "I-word" hit the mainstream media after war-loving, chicken hawk and John McCain-lapdog Senator Lindsey Graham warned Obama that Republicans would call for his impeachment if he released more prisoners from Guantanamo Bay without Congressional approval. Before that, anyone mentioning impeachment was shouted down and cast by the media and the establishment as nutty, kooky or… wait for it… a conspiracy theorist. Obama responded to Graham’s threat by having his underlings release news that another Gitmo prisoner may soon be sprung.

I am under no illusion that the impeachment proceedings are in the offing, regardless of what Obama does. Neither is Obama. Graham’s threat was as idle as an inattentive parent’s threat to a misbehaving child. When you hear a parent tell his child "No" over and over, and then hear him say, "You do that once more and you’re in trouble," you know that child is never disciplined — and the child knows it, too. This is Congress and Obama.

Neither Republicans nor Democrats in Washington, D.C., are interested in anything other paying lip service to the Constitution while solidifying their respective grips on power and transferring America’s wealth to their favored crony partners. That is all that matters in D.C. Neither party will intentionally do anything to upset their cushy apple cart.

And the MSM, which long ago abandoned any pretense at objective journalism, are beholden to the elites and in the tank for the regime, drunk as they are on being next to the power structure. You can’t expect real journalism with a lineup like this:

• ABC Senior Correspondent Claire Shipman is married to outgoing White House Press Secretary Jay Carney.

• CNN President Virginia Moseley is married to Hillary Clinton’s Deputy Secretary Tom Nides.

• CBS President David Rhodes is the brother of top Obama official Ben Rhodes, who is responsible for rewriting the Benghazi talking points.

• ABC President Ben Sherwood is the brother of Obama special adviser Elizabeth Sherwood.

However, six years of this lawless regime is more than any sane person should be expected to endure. Even leftist legal scholar Jonathan Turley called Obama "the president Richard Nixon always wanted to be."

So here are my articles of impeachment — in no particular order — for the undocumented usurper currently despoiling the People’s House: Barack Hussein Obama.

• He provided aid and comfort to the enemy by releasing five suspected terrorists and former members of the Taliban who participated in or orchestrated attacks against Americans.

• He violated a law he signed six months prior requiring him to notify Congress 30 days before releasing GITMO detainees.

• He has willfully and repeated violated Article I, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution by continuously amending the Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare.

• He knowingly and willfully violated Article I, Section 7 of the U.S. Constitution by signing the ACA, knowing full well it was a bill for raising revenue that had originated in the Senate.

• He engaged in fraud by repeatedly lying to the American people about the effects of the ACA by claiming that Americans could keep their current coverage and physicians if they chose.

• He exercised an abuse of power by instructing, through his proxies, agents of the Internal Revenue Service to target conservative organizations and his critics for extra scrutiny and audits.

• He participated in an obstruction of justice and a criminal conspiracy by hindering a Congressional investigation into the Internal Revenue Service targeting scandal and using Attorney General Eric Holder and the Department of Justice in that obstruction.

• He provided aid and comfort to the enemy by ordering or allowing the sale of arms and ammunition to al-Qaida-linked terrorists in Syria and by dispatching agents of the government to advise and train in the use of the those weapons and in military tactics.

• He failed, despite repeated requests by the U.S. Consulate, to provide the security necessary to ensure the safety of U.S. personnel and the Consulate in Benghazi, Libya.

• He knowingly and willfully denied military assistance to Americans under attack at the Benghazi Consulate, resulting in the trashing of the U.S. Consulate building, the theft of sensitive documents and the deaths of four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens.

• He knowingly and willfully lied and ordered his proxies to lie about the circumstances surrounding the attack on the U.S Consulate in Benghazi, thereby perpetrating a fraud on the American people in order to ensure his re-election and to cover up his illegal gun running operation.

• He violated the War Powers Act by failing to gain Congressional approval for the military attack on Libya that resulted in the overthrow of the Libyan regime.

• He provided aid and comfort to the enemy by using the American military and intelligence organizations and allowing the sale of arms and ammunition to al-Qaida-linked terrorists in order to assist them in overthrowing a legal regime in Libya that Congress had not declared war upon.

• He has repeatedly made war on various Middle Eastern countries with the use of drone attacks without the approval of Congress in violation of the War Powers Act and in violation of Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution.

• He has ordered the murders of at least three American citizens without due process in violation of Amendments 5, 6, 8 and 14.

• He has repeatedly used the Environmental Protection Agency to contravene Congress and pass laws harmful to American businesses and consumers, in violation of Article I, Section 1.

• He has repeatedly violated the 4th Amendment by allowing agencies under his direction to continue to spy upon, wiretap and collect personal information of American citizens who are not criminal suspects.

• He has repeatedly violated Article II, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution by disregarding laws passed by Congress, including, but not limited to, U.S. immigration laws, civil rights laws and the Defense of Marriage Act.

• He knowingly allowed the illegal sale of weapons to Mexican narco-terrorists that were later used to kill Americans, including border agent Brian Terry.

• He obstructed justice by participating with Attorney General Holder in a cover-up of the Fast and Furious gun running scheme.

• He knowingly and willfully violated Article IV, Section 4 by failing to protect the border States against invasion, and in fact encouraged that invasion through his rhetoric and with the use of executive orders that contravened U.S. immigration law.

• He knowingly and willfully violated Article IV, Section 4 (guaranteeing a republican form of government to each State) by strong-arming, intimidating and threatening to withhold funds from the States of Oklahoma, Texas, Montana, Rhode Island and Arizona in order to coerce the people and legislatures of those States and prevent the passage of laws according to the citizen’s wishes.

• He instructed his Interior Secretary to ignore the orders of Federal courts to lift a moratorium on deepwater drilling in the Gulf of Mexico, which denied oil workers an opportunity to earn a living and damaged the U.S. economy.

• He broke established precedent and contravened established bankruptcy law, to the detriment of the bond holders and the advantage of his campaign contributors (auto unions) in the General Motors bailout.

• In the auto bailout, he knowingly and willfully deprived numerous auto dealers of their dealerships for political reasons in violation of Amendments 4 and 14.

• He repeatedly transferred funds from the U.S. Treasury to his cronies and campaign contributors for use in failing green energy schemes.

• He violated Article II, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution by appointing officers without first obtaining the "Advice and Consent of the Senate."

In his book Faithless Execution, Building the Political Case for Obama’s Impeachment, Andrew C. McCarthy notes: "Impeachment is a grave remedy on the order of a nuclear strike." Obama’s lawless Presidency has been nothing less than a nuclear strike on the U.S. Constitution, which now lies in tatters.

"Impeachment is a political remedy: even if palpably guilty of profound transgressions, a president will not be ousted without a groundswell of public ire," McCarthy writes.

In his case for impeachment, McCarthy breaks Obama’s high crimes and misdemeanors into seven articles. They are:

• Article I: The President’s willful refusal to execute the laws faithfully and usurpation of the legislative authority of Congress.

• Article II: Usurping the Constitutional authority and prerogatives of Congress.

• Article III: Dereliction of Duty as President and Commander in Chief of the U.S. Armed Forces.

• Article IV: Fraud on the American People.

• Article V: Failure to execute the Immigration Laws faithfully.

• Article VI: Failure to execute the laws faithfully: Department of Justice.

• Article VII: Willfully undermining the Constitutional rights of the American people that he is sworn to preserve, protect and defend.

Those articles contain many of the charges laid out above. But they also include Obama’s defiance of Congressional law and court orders in obstructing the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste project, his defiance of Federal law requiring him to address Medicare insolvency, his undermining of and contempt for Congress’ duty to conduct oversight of Federal agencies, his dereliction of duty by imposing unconscionable rules of engagement that endanger American troops, lying about Iran negotiations and assisting that country with its nuclear program, politicization of the DoJ, politically motivated selective prosecution by the DoJ, DoJ investigations and other intimidation of journalists in violation of Amendment 1, systematic stonewalling of Congress, abridgement of Amendment 1 in appeasing Islamic supremacists by adopting repressive sharia blasphemy standards, suppression of information about Islamic terrorism, including its occurrence at Ft. Hood, abridgement of Amendment 1 by vindictively targeting and prosecuting high-profile critics, and his abridgement of Amendment 2 by joining an international treaty despite Congressional opposition.

McCarthy notes that since impeachment is a political rather than a legal remedy, the burden of proof is different. But he also states that as long as there is no groundswell of opposition to the President’s actions from the public, there will be no impeachment.

I’ll go one step further: As long as there is not a two-thirds majority of Republicans in the Senate, there will be no impeachment. But even in the off chance that Republicans were to somehow come up with 66 Senators willing to remove the President, the Republicans would not have the stomach to attempt it because the sycophantic media would gin impeachment up as a racial issue and stir up street riots that would make Watts riots look like a park stroll.

The ensuing carnage would likely result in the removal of the entire power structure in Washington. And the establishment — whether it sides with the Democrats or Republicans — will agree it can’t have that.

Update: In the wake of the growing chorus of calls for Obama’s impeachment, the GOP establishment has publicly announced it cares more for power than the Constitution.





Impeach Obama? The Democrats Would Love For Us To Try
Impeachment at this time would give Democrats something that would unite them, while at the same time switching voters’ attention from all of the Administration’s scandals to something that will be presented as a mean-spirited Republican hatchet job. So many scandals have erupted recently that Democrats must feel like they are damned & doomed: Benghazi, Obamacare, IRS persecution of conservatives, the NSA spying on all of us, immigration, Fast & Furious, the VA scandal, and the Bergdahl-for-five-terrorists swap. Having an opponent bring up all of these scandals, night after night and commercial after commercial would be a Democrat’s worst nightmare. That’s why, if I were a Democratic candidate, I would be praying for the Republicans to announce an impeachment campaign against Obama. There is simply no other issue that could distract voters’ attention away from all of these other issues and give me a chance to win.


Impeach Obama? The Democrats Would Love For Us To Try

Impeach Obama? The Democrats Would Love For Us To Try

June 12, 2014 by Chip Wood — Personal Liberty Digest

How much effort should members of the liberty movement devote to the impeachment of Barack Hussein Obama?

I’m going to argue not a minute and not a penny. I am convinced that beating the drums to get the House of Representative to vote on articles of impeachment would be a terrible tactical mistake that would play right into the hands of our enemies.

Now, don’t get me wrong. I’m not saying that there aren’t plenty of grounds for impeachment. Heck, if we had a majority of Constitutionalists in the House and Senate, we wouldn’t even be having this discussion today. If that were the case, Obama would already have been put on trial for his numerous violations of the Constitution. And then found guilty.

In my column last week, I described how the latest disastrous decision of this Administration — the absolutely incredible prisoner exchange that freed five of the most dangerous terrorists from prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba — had led to "rumblings" about impeachment as the one sure way to stop Obama from carrying out any more of his Marxist schemes.

Then, this past Monday, Bob Livingston, the founder of Personal Liberty Digest™, published a column titled The Case For Obama’s Impeachment. Please check it out if you haven’t already read it; it is the most damning list of the reasons Obama should be impeached that I have read anywhere.

Here’s how the very first sentence of that column put it: "There is clear and convincing evidence that President Barack Obama has on numerous occasions willfully committed treason and high crimes and misdemeanors and should be removed from office."

And you know what? I agree. If you read the more than two dozen specific items Livingston offered in his articles of impeachment, I’m sure you will, too. In fact, my only point of disagreement comes at the end of that superb presentation. That is his contention that if it looked like there was the slightest chance that the House of Representatives would seriously consider impeachment charges against the President, "the sycophantic media would gin impeachment up as a racial issue and stir up street riots that would make Watts riots look like a park stroll."

While I certainly don’t doubt that the mainstream media, which have repeatedly demonstrated their slavish devotion to Obama, would do anything they could to protect and defend the President and discredit any effort to impeach him, I don’t believe they could instigate race riots across the country because of it. In fact, I don’t think the most avid racist agitators in the country today, from Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson on down, could do that.

Cutting out welfare could. Or even mounting a threat to substantially reduce it. But I don’t think a movement to impeach this country’s first black President would.

So if there are ample grounds for moving to have Obama impeached (which there are) and if I don’t think we’d see massive race riots as a result (and I don’t), then why am I opposed to working for his impeachment now?

The key word in that last sentence is now. I’m going to argue against trying to impeach Obama at this time for three reasons.

One, we don’t have the votes. While it’s true that there is a Republican majority in the House, I don’t think most of them would support a resolution to impeach Obama at this time. And even if they would (something I seriously doubt), there is absolutely no question what would happen in Harry Reid’s Senate. The effort would be dismissed with the absolute minimum amount of discussion he could allow.

If the evidence against Obama is so overwhelmingly clear, why don’t we have the votes? That brings me to my second reason: We don’t have the public’s support. We don’t have their support because they aren’t informed enough, and they aren’t (yet) angry enough.

Given time, those last two factors could disappear. In fact, the latest Obama Administration scandal at Veterans Affairs could lead to an explosion of anger that could cost the jobs of a bunch of politicians — and some pencil-pushing bureaucrats, too.

And that brings me to my third and most important reason for opposing an impeachment campaign at this time. Right now, the Democrats are in utter disarray. Why would we want to give them something that would unite them, while at the same time switching voters’ attention from all of the Administration’s screwups to something that will be presented as a mean-spirited Republican hatchet job?

So many scandals have erupted recently that Democrats must feel like they’ve been caught in a nightmarish version of Whac-A-Mole: Benghazi, Obamacare, Internal Revenue Service persecution of conservatives, National Security Agency spying on all of us, immigration, Fast and Furious, the Bowe Bergdahl-for-five-terrorists swap.

And now the biggest one of all: the shocking and shameful way this country has been treating its military veterans who need medical care. Just this week, we learned that an audit of the VA found that 57,436 veterans are currently waiting to be scheduled for some kind of care. An additional 63,869 vets had enrolled in the VA healthcare system over the past decade but have never been seen for an appointment. (Aren’t you impressed with the exactness of those government numbers? You’re supposed to be.)

These numbers are not just shocking; they are absolutely criminal. The more we learn about the lies and cover-ups and faked statistics at the VA, the worse it looks. And now we’re supposed to be glad that the government is going to take over the rest of this country’s healthcare system? God help us.

That’s why so many Democrats running for re-election are terrified of what all of these scandals will mean for their chances. And we’re talking some big numbers here: one-third of the Senate, every member of the House of Representatives, and a ton of State legislators and Governors are at stake this November.

Hiding from one or two of these scandals would be tough enough. But having an opponent bring up all of them, night after night and commercial after commercial? It’s a Democrat’s worst nightmare.

That’s why, if I were a Democratic candidate, I would be praying for the Republicans to announce an impeachment campaign against Obama. There is simply no other issue that could distract voters’ attention away from all of these other issues and give me a chance to win.

Don’t blow it, Republicans. You have a golden opportunity to win back the Senate, to increase your majority in the House and to add to the number of Republican State legislators and Governors. Don’t give the Democrats the one issue that could salvage the coming midterm elections for them.

Keep the focus on the scandals that the American public can see and understand. Earn their support because you deserve their support. Do a good enough job, and you’ll see the rewards this November.

Let’s win enough victories this fall, and then let’s talk about the best way to bring Obama to account.

Until next time, keep some powder dry.

–Chip Wood





Huge Election Upset Reveals That Americans Want The GOP To Secure The Mexican Border, Dump The Amnesty Plan and Tell Obama To Go To Hell If He Doesn’t Like It
Who in his right mind would even consider amnesty for millions of people already here illegally? Why would we even think of rewarding a country (Mexico) that is laughing in our face? It is sending its poor, jobless citizens to us — so we can pay the welfare, medical, education & prison bills it should be paying. Mexico is a desperately poor country. They are trying to stick all their bills and responsibilities on American taxpayers. Obama has erased the border. He’s obliterated the law. He’s bankrupting the economy. He’s overwhelming the system with spending and debt. The plan is accelerating.This is the invasion of America. This is the end of the GOP. Cantor, are you blind, deaf and dumb? GOP leaders like Eric Cantor are either complete idiots, cowards afraid of their own shadow or traitors complicit in the destruction of America


Huge Election Upset Reveals That Americans Want The GOP To Secure The Mexican Border, Dump The Amnesty Plan and Tell Obama To Go To Hell If He Doesn’t Like It

How Mexico Defeated GOP Majority Leader Eric Cantor

June 13, 2014 by Wayne Allyn Root — Personal Liberty Digest  

Watch the video here — http://personalliberty.com/mexico-defeated-gop-majority-leader-eric-cantor/ — or read the text of it below:

Hello, I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. U.S. Congress Majority Leader Eric Cantor just lost in perhaps the biggest upset in the history of politics in his country. In D.C. they don’t understand what just happened. Well, I’ll tell you what happened.

I’ve written about the plight of U.S. Marine Sgt. Andrew Tahmooressi. He’s being falsely imprisoned by our "friend" and neighbor, Mexico. He’s been mistreated, beaten and, some would say, tortured. Isn’t it time President Barack Obama did something? Isn’t it time for GOP leaders to demand action?

What does this have to do with Cantor’s stunning defeat? Everything. The people who represent us in Washington, D.C., are off the grid. They are tone-deaf. They don’t care about what "we the people" care about. Cantor probably doesn’t even know about our hero Marine stuck in a Mexican prison. And that’s the problem. Our leaders are out of touch with the people — and with reality.

Separate from the plight of our hero Marine in Mexico, we have an invasion going on right now on the Mexican border.

Our borders are no longer enforced. Thousands of illegals are pouring over the border, and they aren’t even bothering to hide from police or Border Patrol. They are walking into America in plain sight and searching for police. They are thrilled to surrender to authorities because they have all heard the news: Obama has created de facto amnesty.

Obama and Holder are ignoring the law of this country. They have spread the word: "Bring your children, cross the border, we’ll feed you, house you, and we’ll provide you with civil rights lawyers at taxpayer expense. And you can stay indefinitely."

So they’re coming by the thousands — from Mexico and Central America. They are young, poor and uneducated. They will cost billions of dollars to house; to feed; to provide entitlements, healthcare and public education for; and, in many cases, in the cost of police, courts and prison. America is already bankrupt and more than $17 trillion in debt. This is the tipping point.

And it’s no mistake, accident or coincidence. Obama never has to face voters again. He is out of control. He is hell-bent on the destruction of America — and the Republican Party — in his remaining time in office.

Yet moderate, establishment Republicans in Washington, D.C., say nothing. Cantor said nothing. This is a purposeful plan by Obama to overwhelm the system — to flood America with poor, dependent illegal immigrants. This is how you flood the country with future Democratic voters. Keep in mind where the government is dumping them: Arizona and Texas.

This is a purposeful plan to punish GOP Governors and turn red States into blue States.

This is an invasion. This is criminal. The President refuses to secure the border. He refuses to send back criminals. He empties our prisons to purposely dump illegal immigrant felons back on the streets (36,000 last month, to be exact).

He spends your taxpayer money on lawyers for illegals. He gives them sanctuary against the laws of America. He spends your taxpayer money to run advertising campaigns in Mexico to tell illegals in America they should request food stamps.

He orders the Internal Revenue Service to target and persecute GOP donors and conservative critics, but to look the other way while the same IRS pays $4 billion per year in "earned income tax credits" to illegal immigrants who paid no taxes.

This is the final destruction of America. Still, Cantor and his clueless moderate establishment Republican leaders in D.C. said nothing and did nothing.

Now, add in our hero Marine rotting in a Mexican prison for no good reason for two months (and counting). Yet Cantor said nothing and did nothing.

So at this very moment — with our borders under attack, with a wave of illegals invading America to overwhelm the system, with Obama emptying the prisons of foreign felons, with Mexico falsely imprisoning and torturing a hero U.S. Marine — what do Cantor and the GOP do? They say they support immigration reform and want to rush it through Congress before the November election.

Folks, this is insanity: first, because it’s time to stop rushing passage of controversial bills before anyone has read them.

Didn’t we try this with Obamacare? Didn’t we hear that if we liked our insurance we could keep it? Didn’t we hear we could keep our doctors? Didn’t we hear our health insurance premiums would go down? All lies. Complete fraud. Now, Republicans want to rush through a bill their own base does not support before reading the details? Madness.

But worse, any idiot knows that the GOP stands a great chance of winning big in November. Why would a GOP leader want to ruin that by upsetting his base? Why would you thumb your nose at your best customers? Why would you ignore what your most loyal voters are telling you? Madness.

There’s dumb, but then there’s dumber. Cantor was both dumb and dumber. If the GOP wins big in November, it will be in a position to dictate terms of surrender to Obama over the issue of immigration reform. Right now, the GOP is at a big disadvantage. Come next January (only a few months away), the GOP will be sitting pretty. Why would anyone with a brain try to push through an immigration bill now in the waning days of a Congress where you are at a disadvantage? Madness.

No one can be this dumb or tone-deaf.

I haven’t even gotten to the most important point. At this moment in time — with Mexico laughing in our face, imprisoning and torturing our hero Marine, and with our border being overrun — who in his right mind would even consider amnesty for millions of people already here illegally? Why would we even think of rewarding a country (Mexico) that is laughing in our face? It is sending its poor, jobless citizens to us — so we can pay the welfare, medical, education and prison bills it should be paying. Next, like Fidel Castro, Mexico will empty its prisons to send us its worst criminals.

Mexico is a desperately poor country. They are trying to stick all their bills and responsibilities on American taxpayers.

Anyone not blind can see what’s coming. Obama has erased the border. He’s obliterated the law. He’s bankrupting the economy. In the bargain he’s enriching his favorite donors: lawyers. He’s overwhelming the system with spending and debt. The plan is accelerating.

This is the invasion of America. This is the bankruptcy of our economy. This is the end of the GOP. Cantor, are you blind, deaf and dumb? GOP leaders like Cantor are either complete idiots, cowards afraid of their own shadow or traitors complicit in the destruction of America.

So wonder no more about the stunning defeat of Cantor. I say good riddance. Now, it’s time to throw out the rest of the tone-deaf fools in Washington, D.C.

I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. God bless.





America’s Enemies Are Laughing & High-Fiving As Obama Has Found Yet Another Unimaginable Way To Both Damage And Embarrass America At The Same Time: Obama traded one obvious deserter & traitor for 5 of the most cunning, vicious mass murderers and America-haters in history
What did we get? A traitor who purposely walked away from his guard post, searching for the enemy to surrender to. And here’s the most disconcerting thing of all: At the White House ceremony announcing the trade, Bergdahl’s father spoke in Arabic; it is reported his father converted to Islam. Obama broke the law to set them free, to rain hell down on our American hero soldiers and to plot a new 9/11 that could kill thousands or even hundreds of thousands of Americans (think dirty bomb). The world is shocked & horrified. Our military is demoralized. Our economy is in free fall. Our dignity & legacy are in tatters. Our reputation across the globe is shattered. Obama is destroying the once-great America!


America’s Enemies Are Laughing & High-Fiving As Obama Has Found Yet Another Unimaginable Way To Both Damage And Embarrass America At The Same Time: Obama traded one obvious deserter & traitor for 5 of the most cunning, vicious mass murderers and America-haters in history

Obama Makes Worst Trade Since American Indians Sold Manhattan For $24

June 6, 2014 by Wayne Allyn Root — Personal Liberty Digest

Watch the video here — http://personalliberty.com/obama-makes-worst-trade-since-american-indians-sold-manhattan-24/ — or read the text of it below:

Hello, I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. President Barack Obama has done it again! He’s found an unimaginable way to both damage and embarrass America at the same time.

Remember how the American Indians gave up Manhattan? The Indians were robbed. They were conned into selling Manhattan for $24 of trinkets in 1626.

That was the worst trade in history. Until now.

Obama’s trade for Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl now tops the infamous list of "Worst Trades in History."

In the sports world there have been many legendary bad trades. Julius Irving. Kobe Bryant. Nolan Ryan. Hershel Walker to the Minnesota Vikings for an entire team of players and draft picks that led to three Super Bowl victories for the Dallas Cowboys.

But the worst sports trade ever was the Red Sox selling Babe Ruth to the Yankees. The Red Sox didn’t win another title for 86 years. The Yankees became the greatest American sports franchise in history. They won seven World Championships with Babe Ruth.

It was called "The Curse of the Bambino."

Executives got fired for those horrible one-sided trades. Teams were embarrassed. Legends were created. Billions of dollars of franchise value was created (and lost). But none of those trades led to danger, disaster or the potential death of thousands of Americans.

Obama takes the cake. He traded one obvious deserter for five of the most cunning, vicious mass murderers and America-haters in history. Mass murderers and friends of Osama bin Laden were freed by America.

What did we get? A traitor who purposely walked away from his base, searching for the enemy to surrender to:

And here’s the most bizarre and disconcerting thing of all. At the White House ceremony announcing the trade, Bergdahl’s father spoke in Arabic. It is reported the father converted to Islam.

That’s what we traded five mass murderers for? That’s what Obama broke the law for?

The trades of Manhattan and Babe Ruth are both looking pretty good by comparison.

Keep in mind those five sworn enemies of America — mass murderers all — haven’t even gotten back on the battlefield. Yet.

But when they do, remember they were set free by our own President, to rain hell down on our American hero soldiers. Remember they were set free by our own President to plot a new 9/11 that could kill thousands or even hundreds of thousands of Americans (think dirty bomb).

The world is shocked and horrified. America’s enemies are laughing and high-fiving. Our military is demoralized. Our economy is in free fall. Our dignity and legacy are in tatters. Our reputation across the globe is shattered. One man has destroyed the once-great America.

Why did Obama break the law to trade for one deserter? Why would he risk all hell breaking loose for one traitor who cost the lives of as many as 14 military heroes? Two reasons:

• First, Obama was desperate to get the Veterans Affairs scandal out of the headlines. He had to change the topic away from neglect and fraud causing the death and suicide of American military vets under his leadership. How better to change the subject and erase the scandal involving abuse, neglect and even murder of military vets than by appearing to be a Commander in Chief rescuing an American military prisoner of war. Obama had delusions of grandeur, overnight going from bum to hero.

• Second, my sources in military command positions tell me that the CIA reported to Obama that Bergdahl was about to go on global television to denounce America, call our military evil — and do it all in Arabic. Obama would have been humiliated. His narrative of being such a big victor over al-Qaida and the Taliban would have been destroyed in front of the whole world, live on global television.

So here was the perfect way to kill two birds with one stone. But it all backfired as word got out of the betrayal by this American soldier, the deaths of 14 of his military brothers searching for him, his father speaking in Arabic, the danger that the release of those mass murderers presents, Obama claiming we will "keep eyes on them" and then, within minutes, an official in the Mideast counteracting Obama’s words and reporting these mass murderers are free as jaybirds to roam Qatar for the next year — and then free to return to the battlefield.

Obama is either a complete fool; a reckless, naive idiot who doesn’t understand who he is negotiating with; or complicit in a crime against America. You decide. But either way, he broke the law by making the deal without informing Congress.

Forget the humiliation of selling Manhattan for $24. Forget "the Curse of the Bambino." Forget all the humiliating trades in history. This one takes the cake. Babe Ruth is rolling over in his grave.

This curse won’t lose seven World Championships or three Super Bowls. This curse could cost America our international credibility and lead to more kidnappings of American soldiers and the deaths of hundreds or even thousands of deaths to Americans if these mass murderers are emboldened to create a new 9/11.

This is the "Curse of Barack Hussein Obama." America may never recover.

I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. God bless.





Obama’s Anti-America, Anti-Constitutional, Anti-Freedom, Anti-Christian, Anti-Heterosexual, Anti-White Agenda Is Inciting A Revolution
A conflict is coming into play from 2 masses: the liberal lobby for Obama — with his pro-gay, pro-black, pro-socialist agenda, executed by his secret National Security Agency drone army — and freedom-loving, gun-owning Americans who are willing to fight and, if necessary, die for the Constitution. These are the masses headed to battle, to civil war. And I expect it will happen 2 years after the 2016 Presidential election; for the first time in my life I fear blood in the streets. Opposing a panicked crowd is like opposing a cattle stampede. If you stand in its path, you will surely be trampled to death. The problem with crowds is they have no ear for reason. Once a contagious fear grabs hold, a crowd loses all sense of objectivity & all reason. Truth is meaningless. There is no way that you are going to reverse it until the hysteria has run its course.


Obama’s Anti-America, Anti-Constitutional, Anti-Freedom, Anti-Christian, Anti-Heterosexual, Anti-White Agenda Is Inciting A Revolution

Are Americans Ready For A Revolution?

May 28, 2014 by John Meyers — Personal Liberty Digest

"While all our ancient beliefs are tottering and disappearing, while the old pillars of society are giving way one by one, the power of the crowd is the only force that nothing menaces, and of which the prestige is continually on the increase." — From Gustave Le Bon’s 1895 book, The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind

Imagine sitting in a theater watching a movie. Behind you someone jumps to his feet and shouts, "Fire!"

You can’t smell a whiff of smoke, nor can you spot a single spark. The smoke detectors are silent; the automatic sprinklers motionless. Yet none of this matters. Within seconds, The Crowd has been created. People everywhere are screaming out. A mass of people begins to make its way to the fire escape. Assume you know for certain that there is no fire. You face a choice: either plant yourself in the center aisle and oppose The Crowd, or throw yourself into the throng.

If you are a principled man or woman, you might think it’s your duty to oppose The Crowd. Guess what? Fulfilling that duty will be the last thing you ever do. A panicked crowd is not going to listen to what you have to say no matter how well reasoned it is argued. Opposing it is like opposing a cattle stampede. If you stand in its path, you will surely be trampled to death.

The problem with crowds is they have no ear for reason. Once a contagious fear grabs hold, a crowd loses all sense of objectivity and all reason. Truth is meaningless.

There is no way on Earth that you are going to reverse it until the hysteria has run its course.

Crowd Control

The longevity of a government is often dependent on its ability to control and, in some cases, incite a crowd.

Napoleon understood this as well as any leader and used his influence to revitalize France after it had torn itself to shreds during its bloody revolution. The powers that had preceded him — most notably the Jacobins — were able to incite the masses, but thereafter could not control them. A testament to this was the summary execution of Robespierre with the guillotine, the instrument he used so effectively during the Reign of Terror, a 13-month period that claimed the lives of 20,000 Frenchmen.

Crowds are not only pervasive in politics, but are also indigenous to investment markets. As a result, conscientious investors must always be wary of crowds. If one starts to form, markets take on a life of their own, quite apart from reason or reality.

One of the earliest examples of a market gone awry after being besieged by a crowd is the case of the South Sea Bubble.

According to Wikipedia, the South Sea Company "was a British joint-stock company founded in 1711, created as a public–private partnership to consolidate and reduce the cost of national debt." The real objective of the company and its creator, John Blunt, was to bilk the investment public. After British Parliament legalized the sale of stock in 1711, the South Sea Company issued debentures worth 100 pounds a share. Immediately, the stock rose; but not because of any ventures undertaken by the company.

None of the company directors ever traveled to the South Seas; and none of them took seriously any trade with South America, still a protectorate of Spain, which was unwilling to share any of its spoils. For a decade, this inconvenient fact did not matter. Yet Blunt was able to entice the cream of English society into its venture. Royalty, noblemen and even members of Parliament bought into the South Sea promise.

As this new money washed in, it was used to pay off the few that sold out. By 1718, the South Sea Company attracted a much wider audience. Everyone from cobblers to milkmaids learned of this great new venture that promised profit without work.

Propelled by the capital of the masses, the South Sea speculation took off. The price of a single share began to skyrocket: first to 500 pounds, then to 700 pounds and finally to more than 900 pounds. Then in the summer of 1720, the roof craved in. The plague arrived in England, and a sense of foreboding was everywhere. Money became tight, and investors began to sell out.

But when several of them moved to sell, the company was unable to pay off. The South Sea Bubble burst.

Huge fortunes were wiped out, and thousands of speculators were left penniless. By October 1720, the nation was embroiled in a full-scale financial crisis. Bankruptcies swelled, the real estate market collapsed and, in the end, the government itself fell. England was shaken to its core.

Part and parcel of the South Sea Bubble, and typical of all speculative bubbles over the past 300 years, was the participation of The Crowd. Typical to the late stages of a bull market is swelling public interest. This often creates a crowd.

Cautiously at first, and then later with reckless abandon, The Crowd becomes overwrought with greed, propelling it into a feeding frenzy. Thereafter, markets reach unsupportable heights that can no longer be levitated because the universe of new buyers has run dry. The markets collapse underneath their own weight; and another crowd, rank with fear, rushes for the exits. The bullish excesses on the run-up are now exceeded by the bearish impulses of the downside.

This pattern of surge and crash has occurred repeatedly since the South Sea Bubble. To dismiss it now would be like dismissing the ebb and flow of the tides of human behavior.

Nothing Civil About Civil War

For decades, my focus with the masses was which way they would take the markets. The stock market crashes of 1987 and 2008 showed me that is not going to be the total crisis of confidence if markets face big downward swings only to be puffed backed up by imaginary money created by Congress and the Federal Reserve and that real crisis is going to be when the Federal government steps forward and institutes draconian laws upon all Americans.

What the Federal government doesn’t yet realize is the conflict coming into play from two masses: the liberal lobby for President Barack Obama — with his pro-gay, pro-black, pro-socialist agenda, executed by his secret National Security Agency drone army — and freedom-loving, gun-owning Americans who are willing to fight and, if necessary, die for the Constitution. These are the masses headed to battle, to civil war. And I expect it will happen two years after the 2016 Presidential election. For the first time in my life, I fear blood in the streets.

Yours in good times and bad times,

–John Myers





Black And Gay Sycophants Are Deconstructing America: And You’re Being Indoctrinated To Applaud The Wreckage!
Three Things I Hate Most About Liberals: Liberals seem to see only one side of the coin — their side, which is: Pro-Homosexual: I want to vomit every time I hear proud to be gay; when did anyone ever say be proud to be straight? And the more demonstrative gays are (ever notice the overt touching & kissing), the more gay pride they have. Pro-Black: If anyone (especially a straight, white man) ever says anything close to a racist comment, liberals want to hang him in the court of public opinion — so much so that white people are afraid of what they say, while black people can spout off as much as they want. Pro-Islam: This is the most dangerous one because it could tie America into a Hundred Years War. And with liberal leaders like Obama, Islam may win it in 20. Muslims are already the fastest-growing segment of the world’s population & extremism is worse today than it was on 9/11.


Black And Gay Sycophants Are Deconstructing America: And You’re Being Indoctrinated To Applaud The Wreckage!

Black And Gay Sycophants Are Deconstructing America

May 21, 2014 by John Meyers — Personal Liberty Digest 

"We don’t need no education. 
We don’t need no thought control. No dark sarcasm in the classroom
. Teacher, leave them kids alone"
– Pink Floyd, "Another Brick In The Wall"

Liberals are having a difficult time defending Islam. And so they should after a death sentence was imposed on a Christian woman in Sudan for the high crime of not denouncing her personal savior, Jesus Christ.

Meanwhile, the pro-black and pro-homosexual media, such as CNN, focused almost exclusively on NFL wannabe Michael Sam and on the racist of the century, NBA Clippers owner Donald Sterling. There was only a passing mention that a Sudanese court had sentenced a pregnant woman to death.

Meriam Yehya Ibrahim, 27, was convicted of apostasy (the renunciation of Islam) by a Khartoum court, even though she was born and raised a Christian and married a Christian. The court also convicted her of adultery and sentenced her to 100 lashes because her marriage to a Christian man is considered void under Sharia law.

Two thousand years after killing Christians, all that is missing in some Muslim countries are the Romans and the lions. I would tell my liberal friends this, but I no longer have any. I can’t stand their hypocrisy over their pro-rights stance for women along with their defense of Islam, which at its very core robs women of any rights.

And while there is some outrage in America about Ibrahim, so far we haven’t heard a word from President Barack Obama. Obama has plenty of time on his hands when it comes to congratulating NFLer (soon to be ex-NFLer because he is too short and too slow) Sam, who made a spectacle of himself when he was drafted almost dead last by kissing, crying and shoving cake down his male lover’s throat, or when it comes to commenting on a religion near and dear to his heart, Islam. Yet once again, Islam has been revealed for what it is, a werewolf in shepherd’s clothing.

Americans should be shaken that Obama dedicated the National September 11 Memorial Museum in New York last Thursday without one mention of Islam, Muslims or al-Qaida. According to Obama, it is a memorial whose cause was plain-vanilla terrorism, the kind that might spring up in Oklahoma City by homegrown terrorists or in New York City by terrorists from out of the country. I’ve been to the Pearl Harbor Memorial, and I definitely remember the tour guide saying "Japan" and "Japanese" during the tour. But Obama won’t ever make a mention of Islam. He is perhaps too worried about prejudice against his religion or perhaps his Islamic agenda.

Muslims And Their Liberal Supporters Are No Laughing Matter

I suspect Bill Maher is not liked by many of you, but on a typical Friday evening I watch his HBO comedy show so I can see the liberal take on things (best to know one’s opposition) and appreciate his sometimes libertarian views that must make his liberal fans physically sick. Such was the case two weeks ago when Maher and guest Arianna Huffington, the syndicated columnist, got into brouhaha over Islam and its malevolent goals.

Maher was talking to his three panelists about the recent kidnappings of hundreds of Nigerian girls and how little mention there is of the fact that the kidnappers are Islamists. "That (is) the religion at large, (where) women are seen as property, second-class at best, often property," said Maher.

Huffington argued that it is "dangerous for people to stereotype all Muslims as terrorists."

Maher answered back: "Where it becomes dangerous is that liberals like yourself do not stand up for liberalism. Liberalism means, one, mostly, equality of women."

If Maher keeps up this kind of talk, he will be the next Sterling, who is being stripped of his NBA team for sharing his thoughts in what he believed was a private and intimate moment with a parasitic woman who wanted to tape and extort him. Maher doesn’t like Islam, which is mostly black or brown peoples. This must be intolerable to liberals, and even he could be persecuted for sharing his thoughts. But I have a news flash: Millions of minorities don’t like white people either. And I, for one, am not saying they should have to. If you want to hate me, fine. I won’t agree, but I will defend your right with my life to say bad things.

And would someone please stick a secret microphone next to Spike Lee so we can hear what his private conversations are about white people? But do you really think such a recording would ever see the light of day? And if it did, do you think Hollywood would boycott his movies and actors and that set people would refuse to work for him? Do you believe that if he were exposed at his worst, Lee would or even should be washed up? I don’t. I like some of his movies. And even if I didn’t, he should have the right to make them if people are willing to pay to see them. If people don’t like Lee, they shouldn’t pay to see his movies. Regardless, Lee should have his right to privacy. This means that inside his home he should be able to share his worst thoughts on any subject with anyone and not be recorded and then publicly crucified by the media.

Not so, says Kathleen Parker, who makes a living out of writing her opinions for The Washington Post. On April 29 Parker wrote that Sterling had no right to privacy even in his own home:

First the practical: If you don’t want your words broadcast in the public square, don’t say them. The Orwellian taint to this advice is not meant to be harsh but is offered in recognition of the world in which we live. We’re not so much a global village as a small town of gossips.

On a higher note, such potential exposure forces us to more carefully select our words and edit our thoughts. This isn’t only a matter of survival but is essential to civilization. Speaking one’s mind isn’t really all it’s cracked up to be, as any well-balanced person reading the comments section quickly concludes.

Let me get this straight, Kathy. Nobody can speak his mind, especially your readers, and that’s a good thing? So while you get paid big bucks to speak your mind, everyone else should just shut the hell up!

Here is what I want to know: What have you, Ms. Parker, said at your worst private moments when you were tired, drunk or just stupid? Have you never, ever once said the "N" word (isn’t it silly or is it just cowardice on my part that I am intimidated and don’t feel I can actually write that word even though it is on rap radio ad nauseam?)? Or have you never said a derogatory sentence about homosexuals, Mexicans, Republicans, Canadians or the favorite target of the media to which you belong, white, heterosexual men? To prove it, can we implant your body with a recording device. And if you ever once utter such things you consider private, we "judges of society" can have you stripped of your career and property, as is the case with Sterling.

Three Things I Hate Most About Liberals

Liberals seem to see only one side of the coin — their side, which is:

• Pro-homosexual: I want to vomit every time I hear proud to be gay; when did anyone ever say be proud to be straight? And the more demonstrative gays are (ever notice the overt touching and kissing), the more gay pride they have.

• Pro-black: If anyone (especially a straight, white man) ever says anything close to a racist comment, liberals want to hang him in the court of public opinion — so much so that white people are afraid of what they say, while black people can spout off as much as they want.

• Pro-Islam: This is the most dangerous one because it could tie America into a Hundred Years War. And with liberal leaders like Obama, Islam may win it in 20. Muslims are already the fastest-growing segment of the world’s population. And extremism is worse today, according to polls, than it was on 9/11.

All of the above are eating away American values that made this country great. Sorry if liberals think the late 1950s were a terrible period, but I happen to be nostalgic — especially when my feelings are consistent with many positive truths.

Yet Lee told CNN last week that America is never going back to the days of Ozzie and Harriet. I see nothing wrong with the days of Ozzie and Harriet, President Dwight Eisenhower and a dynamo economy. The 1950s were a time when private speech really was private and you could have an opinion and make it public. But that America is being dismantled. And every time the extremists win, the liberals rip away one more brick in our wall.

Yours in good times and bad,

–John Myers





Do You Understand What Obama Has Done To America's Healthcare System? Forget the threat of losing your insurance, or your doctor, or your medicine. The real threat with government in charge is losing your life; government's incompetence or criminal behavior will kill you!
The national scandal & disgrace at the VA (Veterans Affairs) proves what a disaster Obamacare will be. The VA scandal is proof positive that with government in charge of healthcare, it will bankrupt the entire country & countless Americans will die through incompetence, neglect, waiting lists and fraud. Just like our veterans have already experienced; there was outright criminal negligence as government employees kept secret waiting lists to cover up the long delays for patients that had life threatening illnesses. Government screws up everything it touches, while losing billions of dollars of other people's money. Putting government in charge of healthcare for 317 million Americans will definitely up the death toll!


Do You Understand What Obama Has Done To America's Healthcare System? Forget the threat of losing your insurance, or your doctor, or your medicine. The real threat with government in charge is losing your life; government's incompetence or criminal behavior will kill you!

Bad News On Memorial Day: We Are All Veterans Now

May 23, 2014 by Wayne Allyn Root -- Personal Liberty Digest

 

Watch the video here:  http://personalliberty.com/bad-news-memorial-day-veterans -now/ or read the text of it below

Hi, I'm Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. It's Memorial Day weekend and the national scandal and disgrace at the VA (Veterans Affairs) is the perfect example proving once and for all what a disaster Obamacare will be. We're about to find out what it's like to receive healthcare from the government. With Obamacare as the law of the land, we are all veterans now.

The VA scandal is proof positive that with government in charge of healthcare, it will bankrupt the entire country and countless Americans will die through incompetence, neglect, waiting lists and fraud. Just like our veterans have already experienced.

But this VA scandal is nothing new. Conservatives have warned about the dangers of government-run healthcare for many years, often using the VA as Exhibit A. My national bestselling book "The Ultimate Obama Survival Guide" was released in April 2013. Almost everything hitting the news about the VA today was already known way back then. Let me quote from my book:

Take the Veterans Administration. A federal appeals court has ruled the VA suffers from "unchecked incompetence." That incompetence is killing our brave veterans. I bet you didn¡¯t know 18 veterans commit suicide per day. Or that 85,000 vets are on waiting lists for care. Even a severely depressed vet can wait eight weeks to see a psychiatrist. Still want government to run your healthcare?

That's direct from my book ¨C written 18 months ago. So who couldn't see this disaster coming? Government mismanagement. Substandard healthcare. Vets being treated horribly. Vets dying while waiting on long waiting lists. Vets committing suicide. We knew it years ago. This isn't new news.

About the only thing we didn't know back then was that there was outright criminal negligence that could lead to murder charges. We didn't know government employees kept secret waiting lists to cover up the long delays -- even though they knew patients had life threatening illnesses. That sounds like murder to me.

What a surprise! Conservatives like Sarah Palin and I screamed about "death panels" and "death by rationing" years ago. I predicted in the media long before today's VA scandal that sick Americans would be committing suicide after dealing with government bureaucrats. I warned grandma might die if the same government that runs the Postal Service and the VA was put in charge of grandma's cancer surgery.

We told you so -- a long time ago. Government is a walking disaster. Government screws up everything it touches, while losing billions of dollars of other people's money. How could putting government in charge of healthcare for 317 million Americans possibly work out?

Long before this new scandal, many of us pointed to the U.S. Postal Service. By law, there can be no competition, yet our Postal Service still manages to lose about $16 billion every year. No private sector company in history has ever managed a feat like this.

Or look at Amtrak. The government took over about 40 years ago and has lost about $40 billion since then. To this day, the taxpayers lose $32 every time a butt sits in an Amtrak seat.

All the wars in America's history have cost about $7 trillion. Yet the war on poverty has cost $20 trillion and counting (adjusted for inflation). And poverty is still at all-time highs. What a massive failure and waste of taxpayer money.

The Federal Reserve has one main job: to protect the value of our dollar. Yet the dollar has lost 98 percent of its value since the Fed was founded.

The government couldn't even run a whorehouse and make a profit! In my home state of Nevada (where prostitution is legal in some rural counties), the government took over a $100 million brothel and in one year drove it into bankruptcy. How can anyone lose money on sex? I told crowds at Tea Party rallies across the country, "If you can't run a whorehouse and make a profit, get your damn hands off my healthcare!"

In case you think that's an anomaly, look no further than Off Track Betting in New York. Yes, horse track gambling run by government also went bankrupt -- even though the government skims their take off the top, before the bettors are paid. It's impossible to go bankrupt with that scenario. Government found a way!

The same government that brought you failing gambling operations, failing brothels, failing post offices, failing trains and pretty much failing everything else is now in charge of your healthcare (as well as 17 percent of the U.S. economy).

The same government employees that brought us $17 trillion in national debt are in charge of healthcare, yet Obama promised Obamacare would save money and reduce the deficit. He also promised you could keep your health insurance if you liked it. And you could keep your doctor. And your insurance premiums would not go up.

Do you now understand what Obama has done to America's healthcare system? Forget the threat of losing your insurance, or your doctor, or your medicine. The real threat with government in charge is losing your life! Either government's incompetence or criminal behavior will kill you or, after dealing with the idiots that run the government, you'll just kill yourself.

Happy Memorial Day. We're all veterans now. I'm Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. Happy holiday to all our veterans. God bless you. And God bless America.





Glorifying Perversion: It is now established orthodoxy in the USA that not only must the homosexual lifestyle be accepted by all without question, but it must be glorified by all as well
Unleash the hounds with charges of homophobia. I do not care. Nor do I care when I meet someone whether he is homosexual or heterosexual. I never inquire, nor do I expect it to be announced, much less thrown in my face. It is long-established religious orthodoxy that sexual immorality — including homosexuality — is a sin. That is God’s word, not mine. Don’t blame me. Christianity is my lifestyle. I have no desire to preach that truth to you if you don’t want to hear it. Why must you insist on preaching to me that I should embrace your lifestyle? I will not, for I cannot (Romans 1:18-32). We are no longer slouching toward Gomorrah. We have long since arrived. Going contrary to established orthodoxy has become dangerous. Contrary viewpoints are no longer tolerated in America. That is fascist & oppressive


Glorifying Perversion: It is now established orthodoxy in the USA that not only must the homosexual lifestyle be accepted by all without question, but it must be glorified by all as well

Glorifying Perversion

May 14, 2014 by Bob Livingston — Personal Liberty Digest

Former University of Missouri football player Michael Sam was selected by St. Louis in the seventh round of the 2014 NFL Draft. When he found out, he kissed his boyfriend for all the world to see.

It is now established orthodoxy that not only must the homosexual lifestyle be "accepted" by all without question, but it must be glorified by all as well.

The sports and entertainment media jumped the shark with Michael Sam’s celebrated kiss televised for all to see after learning he was drafted by an NFL team. But the kiss was not a one-off event, as it began to be replayed ad nauseam on sports media, particularly ESPN.

Sam was lauded for his courage in "coming out." But what courage is involved in riding the wave of popular culture? When he announced he was gay, he was invited to the White House by President Barack Obama.

Sam had the example of NBA player Jason Collins, who was featured on the cover of Time in its April 2014 issue of the "100 Most Influential People of the World," after he announced he was homosexual, becoming the celebrated "first ever openly gay player in a major U.S professional league."

There is no courage in glorifying perversion, nor in riding the wave of popular culture. The courage is in opposing it, which can cause you to be sent to a re-education camp (NFL player Don Jones) or cost you your livelihood (Brendan Eich, David and Jason Benham and almost Phil Robinson).

In case you haven’t heard, the Benhams had a show canceled that was scheduled to begin on HGTV. That announcement coincided with an announcement by NBC that it was to begin production of a lesbian sitcom produced by Ellen DeGeneres. The establishment culture has been inoculating us to this end for some time with shows featuring homosexual characters.

Michael Sam and Jason Collins are not Jackie Robinson. Robinson’s effort took courage. Sam’s and Collins’ not so much.

Unleash the hounds with charges of homophobia. I do not care. Nor do I care when I meet someone whether he is homosexual or heterosexual. I never inquire, nor do I expect it to be announced, much less thrown in my face.

It is long-established religious orthodoxy that sexual immorality — including homosexuality — is a sin. That is God’s word, not mine. Don’t blame me.

Christianity is my lifestyle. I have no desire to preach that truth to you if you don’t want to hear it. Why must you insist on preaching to me that I should embrace your lifestyle? I will not, for I cannot (Romans 1:18-32).

We are no longer slouching toward Gomorrah. We have long since arrived.

Going contrary to established orthodoxy has become dangerous. Contrary viewpoints are no longer tolerated in America. That is fascist and totalitarian.





The Real Weapon Of Mass Destruction: Climate Change Or Barack Obama? Obama is by far a more dangerous weapon of mass destruction!!
Obama seems only to detest North American hydrocarbons — a proven and affordable energy that provides national security for the USA. He seems perfectly at ease with Saudi Arabian oil; you might think that Obama is an Islamist whose is at odds with a free America and the Constitution. Obama’s goal is to tax and eventually control the fossil fuel industry in North America. He wants oversight of domestic oil exploration (which creates jobs), of the Keystone pipeline (which creates jobs), and of the expansion of America’s vast and clean natural gas reserves (which creates jobs). Meanwhile, he supports expensive and unproven Green technologies that leave the USA in greater debt and with a weakened economy & further suppressive government regulations. Is Obama deliberately undermining the United States and our energy independence?


The Real Weapon Of Mass Destruction: Climate Change Or Barack Obama? Obama is by far a more dangerous weapon of mass destruction!!

The Real Weapon Of Mass Destruction: ‘Climate Change’ Or Barack Obama?

May 14, 2014 by John Meyers — Personal Liberty Digest 

Last week, the White House had a publicity blitz that reminded me of a preview of a 1960s horror movie. This is not the exact wording of it, but it is the gist:

"The Climate Blob," more hideous than zombies, more destructive than an alien invasion and dealing out death like a killer asteroid. Produced by Barack H. Obama, "The Climate Blob" stars John Kerry as Agent Orange and Nancy Pelosi as The Blob.

What happened instead was the world was told of an imminent threat in a newly released study by 300 scientists. Working for the Obama Administration on a project called the National Climate Assessment, the scientists warned immediate action has to be taken by governments acting in concert (sounds like global government) to prevent a global catastrophe. Here’s a propaganda film the White House released:

"Climate change, once considered an issue for a distant future, has moved firmly into the present," the 840-page report concluded.

The report stated that corn producers in Iowa, oyster growers in Washington State and maple syrup producers in Vermont are all observing climate-related changes that are "outside of recent experience." Left out was whether dogs and cats are living together in California, but you get the drift; without the help of Obama and other Democrats, planet Earth faces an environmental Armageddon.

The National Climate Assessment supports the warning given by Kerry in February in Jakarta, Indonesia, where our Secretary of State told members of that government (perhaps in some ways already all members of the same global government): "It’s not an exaggeration to say that your entire way of life here is at risk."

Kerry went on to say: "In a sense, climate change can now be considered the world’s largest weapon of mass destruction, perhaps even, the world’s most fearsome weapon of mass destruction." Yes, Kerry, a former foot soldier and still a liberal activist, is now a scientist and soothsayer.

I remember the Kerry who gave testimony on Capitol Hill in his infantry greens, not the one speaking to foreign governments for the Greens. Of course, that Kerry was around in the 1970s, the decade when scientists were certain that the world was headed for another ice age.

It seems that keeping up with what is going to happen to the planet is much like knowing if milk is good or bad for you. Both are variable. But climate change involves a lot more scientists, a lot more money and a far bigger agenda for those that embrace the idea of a global government — something that is becoming more of a reality when the citizens of the world recognize that only a single world order can truly establish the necessary laws to save humanity. Mao Zedong would have loved it.

More worrisome is our politicians — especially Obama — who embrace the necessity for "unilateral action," which are code words for global government.

The White House website has its own version of the facts. Under "Energy, Climate Change and our Environment" a statement reads: "The President has taken unprecedented action to build the foundation for a clean energy economy, tackle the issue of climate change, and protect our environment."

The website quotes the President: "We can’t have an energy strategy for the last century that traps us in the past. We need an energy strategy for the future — an all-of-the-above strategy for the 21st century that develops every source of American-made energy."

The President is willing to put our money where his mouth is. In fact, as Kerry was warning of world climate change this past winter, the U.S. Department of Agriculture created what it calls "climate hubs." Washington utopians who have planned it say it is for farmers, universities, industry and, of course, government, to better prepare for climate disasters like floods and droughts that have existed only recently.

And it’s not just idle talk. The White House’s plan is to use the National Climate Assessment report to strengthen Obama’s "Climate Action Plan," which will be stocked with $1 billion in taxpayer money for something called the "climate resiliency fund."

Such names are pure Orwellian doublespeak, and that suits Obama because of his goal to tax and eventually control the fossil fuel industry in North America. He wants oversight of domestic oil exploration (which creates jobs), of the Keystone pipeline (which creates jobs), and of the expansion of America’s vast and clean natural gas reserves (which creates jobs). Meanwhile, he supports expensive and unproven Green technologies that leave the United States in greater debt and with a weakened economy and further government regulations.

Obama seems only to detest North American hydrocarbons — a proven and affordable energy that provides national security for the United States. He seems perfectly at ease with Saudi Arabian oil, which explains why he is always eager to make state visits that show his support for the Muslim kingdom that has massive annual oil production and the largest oil reserves in the world. If you didn’t know better, you might think that Obama is the Mecca candidate — an Islamist whose energy policies, economic programs and globalist views are at odds with a free America and the Constitution.

On June 25, Obama said: "[W]hile we may not live to see the full realization of our ambition, we will have the satisfaction of knowing that the world we leave to our children will be better off for what we did."

What exactly is the President’s ambition and how does he intend to achieve it? Is it possible Obama is undermining the United States and our energy independence for sinister global ambition? If that is so, it makes Obama a far more dangerous weapon of mass destruction than changes in the weather.

Yours in good times and bad,

–John Myers





The Obama Regime’s Recovery Con: Can there be any doubt the U.S. is a collapsing fascist [radical authoritarian suppressionist] state as Obama demands "more of yours while you go poor"!!
The Obama message is really quite simple: His Administration will be held accountable for no failure and will answer to no criticism, evidence notwithstanding. And, the government vows consequences for any American who dares challenge its corruption by exercising the very rights put in place to keep the tyranny at bay. In 16 million U.S. homes, not one person is working and there is no income beyond a government check; that’s 20% of all households that are being supported off the backs of a declining number of American workers. Thanks to Obamacare on 1-1-14 the top marginal tax rate went from 35% to 39.6%, the top income payroll tax jumped from 37.4% to 52.2%, capital gains taxes went from 15% to 28%, taxes on dividends leapt from 15% to 39.6%, and estate taxes jumped from zero to 55%.


The Obama Regime’s Recovery Con: Can there be any doubt the U.S. is a collapsing fascist [radical authoritarian suppressionist] state as Obama demands "more of yours while you go poor"!!

The Regime’s Recovery Con

May 5, 2014 by Bob Livingston — Personal Liberty Digest

Ah, the happy glow of phony numbers and a compliant mainstream media.

Following the release of Friday’s jobs report, Bloomberg’s headline simply beamed "Hiring in U.S. Kicks Into Higher Gear as Unemployment Plunges." All is now rosy in the Obama recovery.

"Stocks rose on the improving jobs picture and Treasury yields climbed," Bloomberg proclaimed. Sorry to bear the news, but it’s all as farcical as the phony money the Federal Reserve is pumping out.

Bloomberg highlighted a 288,000 gain in employment. But you have to read way down to see that the labor force shrank by more than 800,000 in April. Funny math Bloomberg is using. 288,000 minus 800,000 equals negative 512,000. Only in the sociopathic world of government doublespeak does such a huge negative equal a positive.

That’s a far cry from a gain in employment, and it’s reflected in the labor force participation rate, which dropped to 62.8 percent. Labor force participation is the share of working-age people in the labor force. It hasn’t been this low since 1978. That means that 92,594,000 "workers" are not workers. That’s an all-time record. What April really saw was 988,000 drop out of the labor force, the second highest total ever.

President Barack Obama and his minions proclaimed recovery summer in 2010. At the time, the labor force participation rate was 65.2 percent.

Blessed recovery. Just imagine if things weren’t going well where we’d be.

Looking deeper in the numbers (thanks to Zerohedge.com for doing the dirty work) we see what a con job the regime is doing with the statistics. The Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Household survey showed an actual decline of 73,000 jobs. All this while the number of people who currently wanted a job remained unchanged at 6,146,000.

And here’s some more depressing news about America’s depression: The average number of jobs added per month since the peak of the depression (February 2010) is 172,000. But the average number of people who have dropped out of the labor force each month since that time is 175,000.

And what’s more, the "recovery" is not translating into more jobs for workers under age 55. Workers aged 16-54 – note this includes the most productive sector, those aged 25-54 – lost 259,000 jobs in April. Only those aged 55 and above showed a net gain, according to the BLS.

For women, things are even worse. The Obama regime’s war on women workers has driven the number of females 16 and older not in the workforce up to a record 55,116,000. That’s an increase of 428,000 over March.

Workers 55-69 gained 174,000, likely indicating two things: older workers are unable to retire because they’ve spent their life savings (what hasn’t been lost to inflation) just surviving the depression, and they’re now forced to work to support their grown children who can’t find work.

In 16 million out of a total of 80 million U.S. homes, not one person is working and there is no income beyond a government check. That’s 20 percent of all households that are being supported off the backs of a declining number of American workers.

But never mind though, Obamaphiles ensure us that all those jobs lost at the opening of the "George Bush recession" have been recovered.

On Obamacare

Obama’s White House told us, "you can keep your health plan if you like your health plan." Further affronting fact, they’ve claimed that Obamacare is not forcing you to pay for other people’s abortions. The law, they continue to insist, is working perfectly for all Americans.

Of course, Jay Carney pointed out last week that  the Administration doesn’t have any real Obamacare numbers; but any numbers that don’t put a positive spin on the healthcare law are wrong.

One in three ACA enrollees had not paid their premium by April 15. But Obama continues to claim the debate on Obamacare is over and the law is working.

If by "working" he means it’s destroying the health insurance industry, doctor-patient relationships and middle class job opportunities, I guess he’s right.

Thanks to Obamacare, on Jan. 1 the top marginal tax rate went from 35 percent to 39.6 percent. The top income payroll tax jumped from 37.4 percent to 52.2 percent. Capital gains taxes – which is money already taxed once – went from 15 percent to 28 percent, taxes on dividends leapt from 15 percent to a whopping 39.6 percent, and estate taxes jumped from zero to 55 percent. And Obama wants more.

On the Bundy Ranch

I’ve documented for you Senator Harry Reid’s criminality. Here are couple more tidbits that have come to light.

Reid’s interest in Bundy’s land goes beyond transnational green energy boondoggles and the Dry Lake Solar Energy Zone. It seems that Reid is in possession of 93 acres of land near the Bundy Ranch that sit on the path of a future development and a freeway interchange.

Also, the BLM may have violated posse comitatus in its standoff with Bundy and his supporters. The website Uncle Sam’s Misguided Children, a site run by Marine veterans with ties to the intelligence community, spotted at least one U.S. Army Special Forces member among the government-backed thugs threatening Bundy and his supporters.

Remember that Reid said in reference to the Bundy standoff: It’s not over. Las Vegas police officers claim they’re doing all they can to identify any of the militia in the crowd that may have pointed a gun at law enforcement.

Demonstrating the double standard that is a police state; LEOs are free to aim guns at civilians without consequence but go all apoplectic when guns are pointed back by free Americans.

The reality you won’t hear from Obama’s media lapdogs

The whole U.S. economy is a stack of cards hanging on lies and money printing. The stock market is an expanding bubble of insolvency. There is still time – though the window is closing — thanks to the manipulators to buy silver. It’s still under $20 an ounce. That’s a bargain. You need it in your possession. Now!

The President can only tout his failing healthcare overhaul as a success by pretending that evidence to the contrary is invalid.

"We dispute their numbers. We don’t have hard, concrete numbers, but we dispute them," Carney said last week.

Besides, Obama likes to say, the Affordable Care Act is the law of the land, so get over it. (Last time I checked, the 2nd Amendment is another, much older, law of the land.)

Meanwhile, The Administration is using the same strategy to deflect an even more transparent failure on the part of his Administration: the terror attacks that led to the loss of American life in Benghazi, Libya.

Last week, former White House National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor responded to Fox News’ questions about newly publicized White House documents that prove a coverup took place, saying, "Dude, this was like two years ago."

Based on statements by these spokespuppets, the Obama message is really quite simple: This Administration will be held accountable for no failure and will answer to no criticism, evidence notwithstanding. And as we’ve witnessed with the events that unfolded at Bundy Ranch, the government vows consequences for any American who dares challenge its corruption by exercising the very rights put in place to keep the tyranny at bay.

Can there be any doubt the U.S. is a collapsing fascist state?





Obama Is Quite Simply A Jinx, Bad News, A Storm Cloud From Hell, And A Walking Disaster. Obama destroys whatever he touches — except for the two evil empires of China and Russia
Under Obama: The American middle class is no longer #1 in the world; American businesses are being destroyed faster than they are being created; there are now more food-stamp recipients than the number of women working full-time in America; the average full-time male employee now earns less than 40 years ago; there are now 70% more Americans collecting entitlement checks than working in the private sector; the number of working-age Americans not in the labor force is at all-time highs; the workplace participation rate of men is the lowest in history; the workforce participation rate of women is the lowest on record; the workforce participation rate for black Americans is the lowest in history; and 800,000 people dropped out of the workforce in just the last month.


Obama Is Quite Simply A Jinx, Bad News, A Storm Cloud From Hell, And A Walking Disaster. Obama destroys whatever he touches — except for the two evil empires of China and Russia.

Is Obama A Jinx Upon America?

May 9, 2014 by Wayne Allyn Root — Personal Liberty Digest  

Watch the video here — http://personalliberty.com/obama-jinx-upon-america/ — or read the text of it below

Have you heard? China is set to pass America as the world’s No. 1 economy — this year.

For many years now, we’ve been told this day of reckoning was years, if not decades, away. We always knew it would come someday. But under the leadership and economic policies of President Barack Obama, it’s suddenly jumped way ahead of all previous projections.

What an embarrassment. The United States has had the unchallenged No. 1 economy in world since 1872 (when we passed the United Kingdom). Since 1872. Eighteen hundred and seventy-two. Let that sink in for a while.

One hundred and forty-two years of world dominance erased in only six years under one man’s leadership.

But wait. As an infomercial pitchman might say, "There’s much more."

The same thing happening to the economy is happening to the American quality of life. Under Obama, for the first time in history our middle class isn’t No. 1 in the world. Canada’s middle class is now No. 1. And the entire rest of the world is catching up fast. Soon we’ll be No. 10, then No. 20. How low can we go?

The same thing is happening to entrepreneurs and small business. For the first time in history, businesses in America are being destroyed faster than they are starting. Amazing.

Under Obama, there are now more food-stamp recipients than the number of women working full-time in America.

Under Obama, the average full-time male employee now earns less (adjusted for inflation) than 40 years ago.

Under Obama, there are now 70 percent more Americans collecting entitlement checks than working in the private sector (148 million "takers" versus 86 million "makers"). This isn’t a conservative opinion. It’s a fact provided by the U.S. Census Bureau.

Under Obama, the number of working-age Americans not in the labor force is at all-time highs.

Under Obama, the workplace participation rate of men is the lowest in history.

Under Obama, the workforce participation rate of women is the lowest on record.

Under Obama, the workforce participation rate for black Americans is the lowest in history.

More than 800,000 people dropped out of the workforce last month. That’s almost 1 million Americans who have given up… in a month.

Because millions of the unemployed have given up looking for work, the unemployment rate has dropped to 6.3 percent. Obama calls that good news. Heck, at this rate the whole nation might give up looking for a job by the time Obama leaves office; and he’ll report we have reached full employment.

One man – Obama — has done that much damage. So forget the debate over whether Obama is a radical Marxist intent on the destruction of capitalism and America or whether he’s an inexperienced, incompetent, economically ignorant megalomaniac.

Does it really matter?

Obama is like the old joke about a dying man lying in the hospital with his wife of 50 years:

Murray is lying on his death bed in a hospital room. His wife Ida sits by his side.

Murray says, "Ida, you’ve always been by my side.

"You were there when I flunked out of college.

"You were there when I was fired from my first job.

"You were there when I opened a business and it failed.

"You were there when I filed for bankruptcy.

"You were there when I was paralyzed in the car crash.

"Now you’re here by my side as I lay dying of cancer.

"I’ve given this a lot of thought.

"Ida, darling, you’re a jinx. Get the hell out of my hospital room!"

At some point, you just have to conclude that Obama is our jinx. It doesn’t matter if it’s on purpose, or by mistake. The man is ruining our lives, our economy, our jobs and, most importantly, our children’s future.

And by the way, it isn’t just America he’s brought bad luck to. Obama hasn’t exactly been a good-luck charm for the people of the EU, Israel, Egypt, Syria, Libya, Iran, Afghanistan, North Korea or Ukraine either.

Obama is quite simply a jinx. Bad news. A storm cloud from hell. A walking disaster. He destroys whatever he touches — except for China and Russia. Those two evil empires suddenly turned best friends forever are thriving. All of our losses appear to be their gains.

Remember when Obama leaned over and whispered to the President of Russia that after his re-election he’d have "more flexibility" to help out Putin? Don’t look now, but it’s happening exactly as Obama whispered. I’m just surprised he didn’t whisper in Russian.

It seems every country in the world has been badly damaged by the policies of Obama — except Russia and China. Our decline is their shining moment. Suddenly, the world is Putin’s oyster. Suddenly, our military is a feckless joke, incapable of stopping Russia’s expansion plans. Suddenly, our obsession with green energy allows Russia’s economy to soar with energy revenues. Suddenly, our economy is stuck in reverse, while China’s economy explodes. Coincidence?

Funny how all this worked out. Makes you think, doesn’t it?

I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. God bless America.





Is The Most Powerful Republican In The United States Congress, John Boehner, Stupid, Bought And Paid For, Or On The Other Side With Obama And The Democrats?: All Three Is The Resoundingly Disgusting Answer!!
Nothing else explains the news that the GOP intends to pass immigration reform (i.e. amnesty for illegal immigrants who will be future Democrat voters). Democrats are on the run. They are about to be destroyed in November. Every poll shows it. There are literally no voters left to support Obama who aren’t being bribed with a government check. Knowing this, why would the leader of Congressional Republicans want to change the conversation? Why would he want to let Obama off the hook? Why would he discuss anything but Obamacare for the next six months? Doesn’t Boehner want to win? When you’ve got the opposition on the run, why would you lift your boot off their neck? Makes me wonder which team he’s playing for? What about you?


Is The Most Powerful Republican In The United States Congress, John Boehner, Stupid, Bought And Paid For, Or On The Other Side With Obama And The Democrats?: All Three Is The Resoundingly Disgusting Answer!!

Is John Boehner Stupid, Bought, Or On The Other Side?

May 2, 2014 by Wayne Allyn Root — Personal Liberty Digest

Watch the video here — http://personalliberty.com/john-boehner-stupid-bought-side/ — or read the text of it below:

Hello, I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty.

Something is wrong with the most powerful Republican in the United States Congress. Speaker of the House John Boehner is either stupid, bought and paid for by crony corporate interests, or he’s on the other side (a Democrat posing as a Republican). Because nothing else explains the news that the GOP intends to pass immigration reform (i.e. amnesty) this year.

You might be wondering how I know it’s "amnesty?" Because to pass it through Harry Reid’s Senate and to avoid a veto from President Obama, it must include some form of amnesty for illegal immigrants (i.e. future Democratic voters). Nothing could ever pass Harry Reid’s Senate that doesn’t include some form of amnesty, allowing Democrats to wear the crown of conquering heroes to the Latino community and therefore garner more votes for Team Obama in November. Democrats are on the run. They are about to be destroyed in November. Every poll shows it. Democrats are on the run. They are about to be destroyed in November. Every poll shows it. 

Democrats are about to be crushed. They are drowning. They are desperate to shuffle the deck. Why would any sane GOP leader throw them a life preserver?

Chuck Schumer — the ultimate liberal — is winking and nodding on Sunday morning TV shows like it’s a done deal. Do you think he’s winking because he’s just agreed in the backroom to a deal that hurts Democratic voters? Do you think the President that has, for all intents and purposes halted deportations, would agree to any bill that sells illegal immigrants down the river? If you believe that, I have a bridge to sell you in… Mexico.

Now let’s examine why even discussing (let alone passing) any immigration bill is self-destructive, stupid and political suicide for Republicans.

First, Democrats are on the run. They are about to be destroyed in November. Every poll shows it. Every bit of common sense tells the same story. Every conversation with average middle class Americans proves it. Obamacare has ruined Obama and the Democratic Party. The latest poll shows Obama at 41 percent approval. There are literally no voters left to support Obama who aren’t being bribed with a government check. Just as I reported earlier this year, Obama’s support among the actual taxpayers, business owners and homeowners of America is darn close to zero.

Knowing this, why would the leader of Congressional Republicans want to change the conversation? Why would he want to let Obama off the hook? Why would he discuss anything but Obamacare for the next six months? Doesn’t Boehner want to win? When you’ve got the opposition on the run, why would you lift your boot off their neck? Makes me wonder which team he’s playing for? What about you?

Why wouldn’t any sane GOP leader keep talking Obamacare 24/7 for six months in a row, until the clock runs out? Millions have lost their coverage; millions more have had premiums raised; millions have lost their doctors; everyone that can think is steaming mad.

The vast majority of people who got free insurance from Obamacare are virtually 100 percent government-addicted, welfare-loving, food stamp-loving, dependent Democratic voters. Obama hasn’t picked up one vote. But he’s gotten millions of independents mad as a hornet’s nest.

To change the conversation now would be dereliction of duty. If this were the military, General Boehner would be relieved of his command and brought up on criminal charges. He is harming his own troops. He is purposely losing the war. He is pulling defeat from the jaws of victory. Who does that?

Secondly, my grandfather taught me about how to treat your loyal customers. He was a successful small business owner. He always said the key to success was "the customer is always right." Why would Boehner poke a stick in the eyes of his best customers? Why would he mock conservatives? Why would he turn off his loyal conservative base now, on the precipice of a landslide in November? It defies logic.

Third and most importantly, if everyone "in the know" believes the GOP is on the verge of a massive landslide victory (and they are), why would you even think of negotiating an immigration reform bill now? Think about it. Now it’s a lose/lose. Obama and Reid hold all the cards. But starting in January of 2015, with a GOP Senate and House; and Obama an embarrassed, emasculated lame duck; the GOP would hold all the cards.

What Republican leader would be dumb enough to pass the bill now? Wait until 2015 and instead of begging for crumbs, the GOP is dictating the terms of Obama’s surrender. What sane leader would trade a win/win for a lose/lose scenario?

Into this situation steps John Boehner, leader of the party that practices shooting itself in the foot. Boehner is theoretically on our side, yet he wants to let Democrats off the hook for Obamacare; change the conversation to something divisive and controversial; demoralize and anger his own best customers; hand a moral victory to Obama; inspire the Democrats’ core voters; and negotiate from the worst possible position, instead of waiting just a few months to negotiate from the best possible position.

Does any of this make sense to you? So I ask you…

Is John Boehner stupid, bought and paid for, or on the other side? He’s either not thinking clearly, or he’s not on our side. No matter your answer, it’s now clear Boehner has to go.

I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. God Bless America and save us from the Marxist in the White House intent on destroying capitalism and wiping out the middle class… and the feckless, floundering, cowardly or traitorous Republicans in Congress who refuse to stand up to him.





This Hush-Hush Interstate Compact Sponsored By George Soros & The Left Could End Any Chance To Ever Again Elect A Republican As President: It will pretty much let the Northeast, the West Coast and Chicago decide who will occupy the White House
The National Popular Vote (NPV) interstate compact says that a State must award “all of its electoral votes" to whichever candidate for president wins the national popular vote — "regardless of how the citizens of that State vote". If it takes effect, it gives an overwhelmingly unfair advantage to the Democrat candidate since the Democrats control the votes in the most populous areas of the country. The NPV has already been approved in 10 Obama voting states and has been approved by at least one legislative body in another 10 states. The total electoral votes of these 20 states is 243. Since it takes 270 electoral votes to select the next President, the NPV could soon be only 27 electoral votes shy of manipulating future presidential elections.


This Hush-Hush Interstate Compact Sponsored By George Soros & The Left Could End Any Chance To Ever Again Elect A Republican As President: It will pretty much let the Northeast, the West Coast and Chicago decide who will occupy the White House

A Stealth Threat To The Constitution

April 24, 2014 by Chip Wood — Personal Liberty Digest

It isn’t often that you’ll see a large majority of Republicans and Democrats in Congress agree on something. But they did last week, when members of the House and Senate tried to ban an Iranian diplomat from entering this country.

In a real "poke us in the eye" move, Iran had announced it was naming Hamid Aboutalebi as its new ambassador to the United Nations. It just so happens that Aboutalebi was one of the leaders of the mob that stormed the U.S. embassy in Tehran back in 1979 and took 52 Americans hostage. As you may recall, they were kept in captivity for 444 days and were released only when Ronald Reagan succeeded Jimmy Carter as President.

When Iran said it was appointing Aboutalebi as its ambassador to the U.N., Tea Party favorite Ted Cruz (R-Texas) immediately introduced a measure in Congress to ban him from stepping on U.S. soil. The measure passed by voice votes in both the House and Senate, without a single dissenting vote.

When the bill got to Barack Obama’s desk, the President signed it — then promptly announced that he wasn’t going to enforce it. He attached a signing statement that said he would treat the bill "as advisory in circumstances."

Of course, this isn’t the first time Obama has decided to pick and choose which laws his Administration will enforce and which ones it will ignore. This is just business as usual for the Obama White House.

One thing that definitely isn’t business as usual is a measure making its way through various State legislatures that will dramatically affect the way this country chooses its President. At least one analyst believes that if enough States pass it, it will mean the end of any chance to ever again elect a Republican as President.

I’m referring to the National Popular Vote (NPV) interstate compact. If you’ve never heard of it, I’m not surprised. The left is keeping this George Soros-sponsored effort very hush-hush. But you need to know about it, since its adoption could render meaningless the votes of you and your friends for a Republican candidate for the Nation’s highest office.

Basically, the NPV says that a State must award all of its electoral votes to whichever candidate for president wins the national popular vote — regardless of how the citizens of that State vote.

In other words, if this measure takes effect and the Republican candidate receives the most votes in your State but his Democrat opponent gets the most votes nationally, then all of your State’s electoral votes will go to the Democrat. How’s that for making your State election meaningless?

Political analyst Dick Morris said, "If this thing passes, Republicans will never again win a presidential race and that’s why all the Democrats are lining up behind it."

Does the NPV really have a chance of becoming the law of the land in this country? I’m sorry to say the answer is an emphatic "yes." Last week, New York became the 10th State to pass it. The measure was approved last month by both branches of New York’s State Legislature and was signed into law last week by Governor Andrew Cuomo.

"With the passage of this legislation," Cuomo declared, "New York is taking a bold step to fundamentally increase the strength and fairness of our nation’s presidential elections."

No, what New York has done is take a bold step toward making sure that the Democrats never relinquish control of the White House.

Harvard Law School professor Alan Dershowitz is one of the few liberals who have spoken out against NVP. He said that it "certainly violates the spirit of the Constitution." And he added, "Plainly, the founders of the Constitution did not intend for there to be a conspiracy among certain states to essentially abolish the Electoral College."

Back in the time when the Founding Fathers created the Electoral College, we didn’t have the instant communications we enjoy today. It took a while to learn what happened in another part of the country.

That is why the framers of our Constitution decided to have representatives from each State gather together once every four years to elect a President and Vice President. They gave the responsibility of deciding who would be an elector to the individual States, because they were avid believers in limiting the power of the new Federal government as much as possible. Check out the Bill of Rights, and especially the 9th and 10th Amendments, to confirm this.

Do we still need an Electoral College to elect the President and Vice President? Maybe not. But if we’re going to change a system that’s worked for more than 200 years, let’s do it the way the Founding Fathers intended, by amending the Constitution. Not by a sneaky end-run around the Constitution.

You can tell a lot about which side wants this measure passed by looking at the States that have already ratified it. In addition to New York, the nine other States are California, Illinois, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington. The District of Columbia has also signed the compact.

All of them voted for Obama in 2008 and 2012. All of them are a deep, deep blue. All of them have a vested interest in keeping the entitlements coming from the Federal government. Altogether, these jurisdictions control 165 electoral votes.

Newsmax reported: "It also has been approved by at least one legislative body in these states: Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, and Oregon."

If all 10 of these States also approve the compact, that will be another 78 electoral votes. Since it takes 270 electoral votes to select the next President, that would leave the measure only 27 electoral votes shy of the number needed to take effect.

If your State is one of the 10 where the compact has already been approved in one branch of the Legislature, you’d better get busy. Contact your State representatives and get them to agree to defeat this end run around the Constitution.

And if your State hasn’t made either list, don’t think for a moment that you don’t have anything to worry about. Chances are that there are people hard at work behind the scenes in your State capital promoting this measure.

If NPV does become the law of the land, it will pretty much let the Northeast, the West Coast and Chicago decide who will occupy the White House. And all the red States will be effectively disenfranchised.

If you don’t want to live in the result, you’d better get busy and stop the NPV.

Until next time, keep some powder dry.

–Chip Wood





Standing Up To Government Is Now Labeled Domestic Terrorism: However, the real domestic terrorists are not the American people; they are Reid, Obama, Boehner and the rest of the political and bureaucratic class who ignore the rule of law and oppress the American people
The U.S. government is a democracy in name only. In truth, it is fascist and ruled by one party with two names under the control of the globalists.The only goal of the globalists and their psychopathic political class stooges is to loot and pillage. They have done so to the point that America is now a giant rock rolling downhill toward collapse. As regimes get closer to collapse, they inflict increasingly greater pain and controls on their people. It is now evident in America for those who would see it. The domestic terrorists in question are not the American people. They are Reid, Obama, Boehner and the rest of the political and bureaucratic class who ignore the rule of law and oppress the American people.


Standing Up To Government Is Now Labeled Domestic Terrorism: However, the real domestic terrorists are not the American people; they are Reid, Obama, Boehner and the rest of the political and bureaucratic class who ignore the rule of law and oppress the American people

Standing Up To Government Is Now Domestic Terrorism

April 21, 2014 by Bob Livingston — Personal Liberty Digest

The political class is now demonstrating a level of hubris rarely, if ever, seen in the American system.

Within just a few hours, three of the top four most post powerful politicians in the country unabashedly revealed the low opinion they have of liberty and the American people and a willingness to persecute, prosecute and lie to those who advocate and fight for Constitutional government. And by their silence, the rest of the political class nodded their agreement.

First, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid called Bunkerville, Nev., rancher Cliven Bundy and the hundreds of Americans who rallied to Bundy’s defense domestic terrorists. Then, President Barack Obama brazenly lied to the American people in claiming that 8 million people had signed up for Obamacare and that the program was a success, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. And early Friday morning, we learned Speaker of the House John Boehner has proclaimed once again to big money donors and crony capitalists that an immigration bill would be passed this year over the wishes of the majority of Americans.

Within hours of reports circulating in alternative media of Reid’s use of the Bureau of Land Management in his land grab on behalf of a Chinese solar energy firm, BLM pulled its goon squad of armed enforcers out of the area. It also scrambled to delete evidence from its own website that the area the Bundy family has used to graze their cattle is needed for "utility-scale solar power generation facilities on public lands" and that need was hindered by "trespass grazing" cattle.

Reid and his son Rory have worked in lockstep with the BLM and transnational green energy firms to wrestle land and use rights from American ranchers for years. Bundy is the last rancher standing in an area that once saw dozens of them.

What few reports on the standoff between Bundy and BLM that have made it into the mainstream media speciously claim the Bundy ranch is some 200 miles from the proposed site of the ENN Energy Group’s solar farm and panel building plant, and that the ENN project was shelved last year. Even the supposedly reliable "right wing" websites Breitbart.com and Glenn Beck’s The Blaze have carried the Federal government’s water on this dispute. The two-faced Beck — who has called for a pitchfork revolution and sells shirts calling for one — even went so far as to call Bundy supporters "frightening" and compared them with Occupy Wall Street, which was a CIA-funded operation designed to foment unrest in America.

Claims have also been made that the Federal government owns the land in question. But the Constitution specifically describes in Article I, Section 8 what land the Federal government can possess, and there are subsequent Supreme Court decisions that lay out the legal framework. (Hint: It does not include protecting tortoises or building solar plants.)

A BLM document discusses the Dry Lake Solar Energy Zone and specifically mentions the Gold Butte area (which includes Bunkerville) and "cattle trespass grazing" as being part of critical concern to future utility-scale solar energy development. In short, Reid is using the BLM (headed by his lackey and former adviser Neil Kornze) to turn all Nevada "Federal lands" into a green energy zone for his and his son’s personal gain and Bundy’s cattle are hindering this effort. This is proven by information on the BLM website (since removed) that states grazing by Bundy’s cattle "impacts" solar development and the construction of solar development on public lands.

Understand the implications of Reid’s claim that those who bravely stood with Bundy, stared into the barrels of heavily armed oppressors who were threatening to shoot them and faced down the BLM’s armed goons are "domestic terrorists."

Thanks to the National Defense Authorization Act, the government can simply designate Americans as terrorists and they can then be disappeared into gulags never to be charged, tried or heard from again. Habeas corpus, in the cases deemed "domestic terrorism," is now nonexistent. Obama has already ordered drone strikes to kill Americans in foreign lands without due process. The step from indiscriminate extrajudicial killings of American "terrorists"  overseas to indiscriminate extrajudicial killings of "domestic terrorists" in America has just been shortened considerably.

This is common knowledge in circles of people who depend upon the alternative media and understand the truth about the Federal police state. Don’t think that Reid is not aware of this. And he understands that those who sided with the Bundys recognize this as well.

Reid is too savvy and too skilled a politician to make a slip of the tongue statement accusing Americans of domestic terrorism.

Obama’s claim that 8 million people have now signed up for Obamacare and the law is working as intended is an incredible stretch even for a man who is such a consummate liar that more than half of Americans know he lies on important issues. The law is working "so well" that even in the face of monetary penalties, tens of millions of people who are eligible to sign up for Obamacare insurance have avoided doing so.

Boehner is said to be "hell-bent" on passing an amnesty bill this year. This has been an important issue for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce for some time and is, therefore, an important issue for the Republican establishment.

Understand that, for the Republican elite, amnesty is not about trying to win over Hispanics in order to bolster chances for carrying national elections. It’s about providing cheap labor for big corporations. The plight of millions of unemployed Americans does not concern the establishment.

I have been writing for many years that the U.S. government is democracy in name only. In truth, it is fascist and ruled by one party with two names under the control of the globalists.

The only goal of the globalists and their psychopathic political class stooges is to loot and pillage. They have done so to the point that America is now a giant rock rolling downhill toward collapse.

As regimes get closer to collapse, they inflict increasingly greater pain and controls on their people. It is now evident in America for those who would see it.

The domestic terrorists in question are not the American people. They are Reid, Obama, Boehner and the rest of the political and bureaucratic class who ignore the rule of law and oppress the American people.





If You Believe Obama’s Lie That Obamacare Is A Success Because of 7.1 Million Enrollees, You’re Probably An Obama Apologist Or A Fool Or Both
Obamacare is a success only because it’s accomplishing exactly what its statist crafters envisioned — it’s locking people into a socialistic redistributionist death-care system controlled by a few elites. Gullible Democrats & Obamaphiles continue to buy the lie that Obamacare is about insuring the uninsured. If you still ride that bandwagon, these facts probably won’t knock you off of it: By the fall of 2014 Obamacare will have caused more than twice as many to lose health insurance than have gotten insurance under the law; Obamacare has resulted in $70 billion a year in lost wages and about 3 million workers losing their jobs; there are premium increases of 200% to 600%; in New York, 44% of doctors have refused to participate in the exchanges; deductibles are ranging between $5,000 and $10,000 on Obamacare plans; and etc..


If You Believe Obama’s Lie That Obamacare Is A Success Because of 7.1 Million Enrollees, You’re Probably An Obama Apologist Or A Fool Or Both

Obamacare Is A Success

April 18, 2014 by Bob Livingston — Personal Liberty Digest

There are only so many ways to call President Barack Obama a liar (and Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid and all the other Obamacare apologists) and describe the evil nature of his signature wealth redistribution and deathcare scheme: Obamacare. The English language, or at least my grasp of it, is wholly inadequate for the task.

It’s become so bad that writing just this short piece on more Obamacare lies was an arduous task that took far longer than it should. Every lede I began sounded trite and clichéd because every one has been written before.

Gullible Democrats and Obamaphiles bought the lie — and in many cases continue to buy the lie — that Obamacare was about insuring the uninsured. If you still ride that bandwagon and what I’m about to tell you doesn’t knock you off it, there is little hope anything will.

According to numbers touted by Obamacare advocates in the run-up to the law’s unConstitutional passage in early 2010 (laws raising revenue must originate in the House and Obamacare — which is a tax, according to the Supreme Court — originated in the Senate), somewhere between 32 million to 47 million Americans were uninsured. That’s not to say they were uninsurable. They were just uninsured.

Whichever number you settled on, that number, of course, was completely contrived. It was a combination of people who were self-insured, those who chose not to buy insurance, those temporarily between jobs, illegal aliens and a group of about 10 million who were truly unable to purchase healthcare insurance because of pre-existing conditions.

Now Obama is touting his 7.1 million Obamacare enrollees as a success.

Let’s look at the real numbers. According to estimates by the RAND Corporation, two-thirds of those Obama claims signed up by the deadline were previously insured. That means only 2 million to 2.4 million were previously uninsured.

Also, those who missed the March 31 enrollment deadline (for whatever reason) are now unable to sign up for insurance until Nov. 15 unless they have a qualifying "life event." A qualifying event includes a marriage, divorce, the birth of a child, a move to another State, lose a job, age out of their parents’ policy, etc. Without a qualifying event, they will remain uninsured.

According to insurance companies, somewhere between 10 percent and 20 percent of those who did sign up through Healthcare.gov and other exchanges have not paid their first premium. The law requires anyone who has not paid after three months to be kicked off the rolls. Once they are kicked off the rolls for nonpayment, they won’t be eligible for insurance without a qualifying event. They will remain uninsured.

If 10 percent of those previously uninsured who have signed up for health insurance are kicked off the rolls, then only 1.8 million people who were previously uninsured can credit Obamacare  for their insurance. That’s only 5.6 percent.

Obama has a pretty low bar by which he measures success.

And here are some more numbers to consider:

• 4.5 million policies were canceled because they didn’t meet Obamacare standards. It didn’t matter whether the holders of those policies were satisfied or not.

• 16 million more policies are expected to be canceled at the next renewal because they won’t comply with Obamacare standards. It doesn’t matter whether the policyholders are satisfied or not. That means that by this fall, Obamacare will have caused more than twice as many to lose health insurance than have gotten insurance under the law.

• Obamacare has resulted in $70 billion a year in lost wages and about 3 million workers losing their jobs.

• Deductibles are ranging between $5,000 and $10,000 on Obamacare plans.

• We are seeing premium increases of 200 percent to 600 percent.

• In New York, 44 percent of doctors have refused to participate in the exchanges.

• Getting a small raise in salary can cost thousands of dollars in "subsidies."

• It’s added and adding information into the dossier the government has on all Americans.

But don’t say Obamacare is a failure. It’s accomplishing exactly what its statist crafters envisioned. It’s locking people into a socialistic redistributionist deathcare system controlled by a few elites.





Will Women Voters Be Gullible Enough To Yet Again Buy This Obama Lie and Keep His America Destroying Agenda Empowered Via The November Elections?
Yet another desperate effort by the Democrats to come up with something that will distract voters from Obamacare, an incredibly unpopular piece of legislation, so it is not the No. 1 issue in the November elections. Once again that distraction is a promise to end the gender wage gap & to blame Republicans for hating women. All of this is a huge lie of course. It’s true that women, on average, earn less than men. But this is almost always because of career & life choices, not because of sexual discrimination. Equal pay for equal work has been the law in this country for years. For Democrats desperate for a way to divert attention from their disastrous healthcare plan & the sad state of the economy, it’s a simple choice. Which will get them the most publicity and the most votes? Tell the truth or fudge the facts? Will women buy this Obama lie?


Will Women Voters Be Gullible Enough To Yet Again Buy This Obama Lie and Keep His America Destroying Agenda Empowered Via The November Elections?

Will Women Buy This Obama Lie?

April 17, 2014 by Chip Wood — Personal Liberty Digest

Welcome to yet another desperate effort by the Democrats to come up with something — anything — that will distract voters from Obamacare.

Forget the absurdity Nancy Pelosi is trying to peddle, that the Senators and Representatives who shoved this monstrosity down our throats should be proud to embrace it. Too many Democratic candidates running for re-election know how unpopular Obamacare is with their constituents. Embracing it would be the kiss of death.

So it’s no surprise that they will try anything to keep this incredibly unpopular piece of legislation from being the No. 1 issue in the November elections. What can they do to energize their base and get voters eager to support them again? How about going back to the well for an issue that worked very well the last time out: accusing the Republicans of conducting a "war on women"?

Yes, that’s the ticket. What better way to get the troops ready for battle than to trumpet a promise to end the gender wage gap? The President repeated a line from his State of the Union address in January, that women earn only 77 cents for every dollar that a man does. That should get the feminine blood boiling.

"Equal pay for equal work — it’s not that complicated," the President declared. He promised to push for passage of something called the Paycheck Fairness Act. And he said he would immediately sign two executive orders related to the issue. After all, why wait for those old fuddy-duddies in Congress to act? He had warned us that he has "a phone and a pen." And by golly, he’d use them both.

All of this is a bunch of utter baloney, of course. It’s true that women, on average, earn less than men. But this is almost always because of career and life choices, not because of sexual discrimination. Equal pay for equal work has been the law in this country for several years.

There are several reasons for the pay disparity. For one, "full time" does not mean the same thing for women as it does for men. The Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that men are almost twice as likely as women to work more than 40 hours a week. Women, on the other hand, are almost twice as likely to work 35 to 39 hours a week.

Risk is also an important factor. By and large, men are far more likely to seek out positions that carry physical risk. The BLS reports that 92 percent of work-related deaths in 2012 happened to men. Dangerous jobs tend to pay higher salaries, to attract the workers they need.

Education is another significant factor. Men are more likely to major in such higher-paying areas as finance, accounting or engineering, while women often chose fields of study, such as liberal arts or sociology, that command smaller salaries.

But by far the biggest discrepancies occur when marriage and children are taken into consideration. Mark J. Perry and Andrew G. Biggs, two scholars with the American Enterprise Institute, addressed this topic in a column in The Wall Street Journal:

Child care takes mothers out of the labor market, so when they return they have less work experience than similarly-aged males. Many working mothers seek jobs that provide greater flexibility, such as telecommuting or flexible hours. Not all jobs can be flexible, and all other things being equal, those which are will pay less than those that do not.

That just makes sense, doesn’t it? Perry and Biggs say that once these variables are taken into consideration, the so-called gender pay gap virtually disappears. They cite a 2012 study by June and Dave O’Neill, two economists with the American Enterprise Institute, that found "nearly all of the 23% raw gender pay gap cited by Mr. Obama can be attributed to factors other than discrimination."

Oh, and let me add one more argument against the Democrats’ contention that pay differences are because of anti-female discrimination, and that only the Federal government can make things right.

Consider this: What if it were true that businesses frequently had a choice between two different potential employees, a male and a female? Both are equally capable. But the woman is willing to do the work for 23 percent less money than the male.

C’mon, how many businesses would agree to hire the male at the higher salary, just because they didn’t want a woman in the job? Why would any business needlessly give a man more money, rather than add it to their own bottom line? Let’s give some credit to the profit motive here, folks.

The latest poll results show why the Democrats are so eager to start beating on the "war on women" drum. In the 2012 Presidential election, Obama received 67 percent of the votes of single women. Clearly, their multimillion-dollar advertising campaign against Mitt Romney and the Republican "war on women" worked.

But now, according to the latest NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll, Obama’s support among single women has dropped to just 48 percent. Better do something to shore up that base! And what better way than to promise to take action to end all that horrible pay inequality in the marketplace?

This is a classic case of "do as we say, not as we do." No sooner had Obama huffed and puffed about the terrible disparity between what women earn in America versus male employees than someone compared salaries among male and female employees in the White House.

Guess what? It turns out that women in the West Wing earn significantly less money than men. Yep, the average female employee in the Obama White House earns just 88 percent as much as the average man.

When asked about this, Obama press secretary Jay Carney could only mumble something about how the White House record is "better than the national average" — and that female staffers tend to earn less than men because they occupy more of the jobs at the lower end of the pay scale.

Yep. And are you surprised to learn that the same thing happens in the rest of the country, Mr. Carney?

It turns out that the so-called gender pay gap has almost nothing to do with the sex of an employee and almost everything to do with career and life choices. But, of course, acknowledging these facts would mean that the Democrats could no longer beat Republicans over the head with all those "war on women" accusations.

For Democrats desperate for a way to divert attention from their disastrous healthcare plan and the sad state of the economy, it’s a simple choice. Which will get them the most publicity and the most votes? Tell the truth or fudge the facts?

Will women buy this Obama lie? Or will a majority see through this effort to enlist them in another phony war? Let’s do our part to make sure it’s the latter.

Until next time, keep some powder dry.

–Chip Wood





The Liberal Bigots Strike Again: The Gay and Lesbian Brigade Want Scalps Of Those Who Dare To Disagree With Homosexual Marriage
The most open and blatant example of the left's new fascism, which says, if you don't agree with us 100%, we have the right to punish you unless you're like Hillary and Obama and you recant. The gay-rights organization GLAAD's President & CEO said: "Mozilla's strong statement in favor of equality today reflects where corporate America is: inclusive, safe and welcoming to all. What she meant, of course, was welcoming to everyone who will march in lockstep with the gay rights brigade; if not, they'll go after you, your family, your job and your employer. If you're a Christian photographer or baker who'd prefer to not cover or bake for a gay wedding, they'll go to court and force you to do so. It seems that it is only traditionalists who must demonstrate "tolerance" these days. Apparently, the gay-rights activists can be as bigoted and intolerant as they want.


The Liberal Bigots Strike Again: The Gay and Lesbian Brigade Want Scalps Of Those Who Dare To Disagree With Homosexual Marriage

The Liberal Bigots Strike Again

April 11, 2014 by Chip Wood -- Personal Liberty Digest 

If you support the traditional view that marriage should be between a man and a woman, could that cost you your job? The intolerant left says the answer to that question is a loud and emphatic "Yes!"

Their latest victim is Brendan Eich, an inventor of JavaScript and the co-founder of the Web browser Firefox. Back in 2008, Eich donated $1,000 to the campaign for Proposition 8 in California, a ballot measure that said, "Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California."

Recently, when Eich was named CEO of Mozilla, the company that oversees Firefox, that 6-year-old contribution cost him his job. We're told that half of Mozilla's board of directors resigned to protest Eich's appointment. But that leads to a question: If half the board opposed him, how the heck did he get the job?

The wireless company Credo Mobile launched an online petition demanding that Eich either renounce his beliefs or resign. The petition quickly acquired nearly 75,000 signatures.

OKCupid, a popular online dating service, urged its followers to boycott Firefox to protest Eich's selection. The company posted a letter denouncing the CEO, stating: "Those who seek to deny love and instead enforce misery, shame and frustration are our enemies and we wish them nothing but failure."

Those are pretty harsh words against a person who, in 15 years at Mozilla, had never been accused of demonstrating any prejudice against gay employees -- or anyone, for that matter. In one of his few statements on the subject, Eich said: "I don't want to talk about my personal beliefs because I kept them out of Mozilla all these 15 years we've been going. I don't believe they're relevant."

How he performed on the job didn't matter to the gay and lesbian brigade. They wanted his scalp. And they got it.

After Eich agreed to resign, Mozilla Executive Chairwoman Mitchell Baker issued a statement that said in part, "We know why people are hurt and angry, and they are right: it's because we haven't stayed true to ourselves."

So forcing someone to resign because of a private donation made more than six years ago is how you demonstrate that you've "stayed true to" yourself? Remember, not a single person claims that Eich did anything on the job to demonstrate any kind of anti-gay bias. By all accounts, he was scrupulously fair to everyone.

And bear in mind that, at the time, most of the public said they agreed with him that marriage should be between a man and a woman. Proposition 8 passed easily in California, one of the most liberal States in the Nation, although it was later overturned by the courts. It won the support of a substantial majority of blacks and Hispanics.

In fact, let me mention two prominent Americans who also opposed same-sex marriage back in 2008: Hillary Clinton and President Barack Obama. Of course, both now claim that they've had a change of heart.

More than 35,000 people donated to the campaign for Proposition 8. Thanks to a court ruling, the names of all the contributors -- and in some cases, their addresses and the name of their employers -- have been made public. I wonder how many more will become targets of angry and intolerant gays.

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas warned of this possibility four years ago. In a 2010 dissent to a court decision requiring such disclosure, he wrote:

I cannot endorse a view of the First Amendment that subjects citizens of this Nation to death threats, ruined careers, damaged or defaced property, or pre-emptive and threatening warning letters as the price for engaging in "core political speech," the "primary object of First Amendment protection."

Not every gay person agrees with the angry intolerance Eich witnessed. Andrew Sullivan, a well-known gay-rights activist, wrote:

If we cannot live and work alongside people with whom we deeply disagree, we are finished as a liberal society.

What we have here is a social pressure to keep your beliefs deeply private for fear of retribution. We are enforcing another sort of closet on others. I can't believe the fanaticism.

Just how bad will could this latest form of bigotry get? On Sunday, during an appearance on ABC News -- "This Week," former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said what we're witnessing is the left's "new fascism." He warned:

This is just the most open and blatant example of the new fascism, which says, "If you don't agree with us 100 percent, we have the right to punish you unless you're like Hillary and Barack Obama and you recant.

I think the question I'd ask yourself is: Are you willing to live in an open and tolerant society, or do you have to impose your views at the cost of people's jobs?

One of the most ironic statements on the controversy came from the gay-rights organization GLAAD. President and CEO Sarah Kate Ellis said: "Mozilla's strong statement in favor of equality today reflects where corporate America is: inclusive, safe and welcoming to all."

Yes, the GLAAD's leader actually said "welcoming to all." What she meant, of course, was welcoming to everyone who will march in lockstep with GLAAD. If you dare to disagree with the gay rights brigade and they find out about it, watch out. They'll go after you, your family, your job and your employer.

If you're a Christian photographer who'd prefer to not to cover a gay wedding, they'll go to court and force you to do so. If you're a baker who has religious objections to a gay marriage, you'd better not decline to bake a wedding cake for a gay couple or you might get sued.

It seems that it is only traditionalists who must demonstrate "tolerance" these days. Apparently, the gay-rights activists can be as bigoted and intolerant as they want.

Welcome to the Brave New World of America in 2014. If you don't like it, you'd better do something about it.

Until next time, keep some powder dry.

--Chip Wood





Obama’s Blind Believers: Liberal Ignorance Is Our Damnation As Most Liberals Are Too Stupid To Argue With
Despite abysmal poll ratings, millions of Americans still trust Obama and believe he is doing a fine job as President. It is tantamount to believing the Titanic was on course even after her bow tipped forward into the icy-cold North Atlantic. So it is for liberals vested in Obama: the healthcare President whose signature Obamacare is collapsing, the bipartisan President who has yet to reach across the aisle except to pick up his golf clubs, the healing President who has widened the divide between blacks and whites. Yet loyal Democrats continue to believe utter foolishness: that Obama is a good President and that the Republicans, the Tea Party, Rush Limbaugh, Sarah Palin and perhaps even Elvis’ evil twin are the reason Obama’s Presidency has failed. The one question that is never asked in liberal corners is whether Obama was ever competent to be President of the United States?


Obama’s Blind Believers: Liberal Ignorance Is Our Damnation As Most Liberals Are Too Stupid To Argue With

April Fooled? You Must Be A Liberal

April 2, 2014 by John Meyers — Personal Liberty Digest

When I was in South Africa with my uncle, Dick, we were part of a travel group from the United States. On our manifest was a diamond mine tour in Gauteng. We walked about where the Great Star of Africa, a pear-shaped diamond weighing 530.20 carats, had been discovered.

Dick and I were more interested in the labor situation than we were in stumbling over a diamond. Just as well, because it turned out to be a dreadfully boring tour; that is, until it was over. That’s when our group was directed towards the mine’s exit. We all lined up like schoolchildren behind what looked like a customs booth that had crashed smack onto the desert.

I nudged Dick in the ribs when I noticed why it was taking us so long to get to our air-conditioned bus. It was a scene right out of a Monty Python sketch. An interrogator — in a uniform replete with a Gestapo-type cap — sat inside a Plexiglas cubicle, and each of us had to pass by him.

When it was my turn, he instructed me to raise my left hand, palm facing out. It was then that a large and flat aluminum square was hand-cranked toward me, waist high. I stood, staring at it.

"Are you ready to give your sworn statement?" asked my adjudicator.

"Sure, why not?"

"Keep your left hand raised and place your right hand squarely on the ‘truth-plate,’ fingers spread. Look at me, and then answer my question: Do you have any diamonds on your person or have you seen anyone on site pick up a diamond today?"

I started laughing. This was no lie detector. I had been around lie detectors, and this was a gag show for the terminally stupid. Dick kicked me sharp in the ankle and leaned into my ear, saying: "Cut it out!"

I kept myself together and declared that, no, I was not carrying any diamonds on me and, no, I had not seen anyone in the group pick any up.

A green light that looked like an old traffic light came on. The makeshift door to my right opened, and I walked through it and toward our bus, laughing like hell.

When all of us were back on board, a married couple from Vermont tore into me about how I could have gotten the tour group into trouble. They were diehard Democrats and took authority most seriously. In fact, they actually believed that what we had been questioned on was a real lie detector.

I said something to them that probably wasn’t all that polite, and my uncle settled me down with a sip from his gin mickey tucked into his sports jacket. He shared with me an important truth that day: Some people are simply too stupid to argue with.

Obama’s Blind Believers

Despite abysmal poll ratings, millions of Americans still trust Barack Obama and believe he is doing a fine job as President.

It is tantamount to believing the Titanic was on course even after her bow tipped forward into the icy-cold North Atlantic. Yet we know that a few minutes before that moment, many on board still believed the Titanic would right herself. What else could they believe? Everything for those on board was vested in the Titanic being what everyone had claimed it was: unsinkable.

So it is for liberals vested in Obama: the healthcare President whose signature Obamacare is collapsing, the bipartisan President who has yet to reach across the aisle except to pick up his golf clubs, the healing President whose five years in office have seen a spike in racial tensions and whose personal utterances from the Oval Office have only widened the divide between blacks and whites.

Yet loyal Democrats continue to believe utter foolishness: that Obama is a good President and that the Republicans, the Tea Party, Rush Limbaugh, Sarah Palin and perhaps even Elvis’ evil twin are the reason Obama’s Presidency has failed. The one question that is never asked in liberal corners is whether Obama was ever competent to be President of the United States?

Liberal Ignorance Is Our Damnation       

After I graduated university, I spent a year in journalism school. That education paid off handsomely. I was taught to assume I’m being lied to when tracking down a story because I probably am.

Questioning everything is hard work. Since people tend to be lazy, this gives liberals a big advantage over libertarians. By the millions, liberals assume a litany of stupid ideas, including:

• Man-made climate change is an absolute fact.

• "Stand your ground" laws are racist and only serve to endanger African-Americans.

• Unless shown the righteous path, white people are — and will always remain — racists.

• Obama is the one person most qualified to show white people the evil of their racist past.

• Black people are hardly ever racist toward whites.

• Gay people are kind and progressive. Only people that oppose gay marriage are ignorant.

• Obama cares deeply about America and preserving the U.S. Constitution.

• The Federal government, led by Obama, wants to help all Americans.

• Obama knows better than we do as to what must be done to help America.

Don’t take my word for it. Just watch CNN. It’s running ads that actually say: "Watch Don Lemon tonight.  He will tell you what stories really matter."

My problem is I don’t want an openly gay civil rights activist telling me what is important. I want to figure that out for myself. That in itself is the difference between a libertarian and a liberal.

Yours in good times and bad,

–John Myers





Obama’s USA Is Starting To Look Like The Grim Early Days Of Mao’s Communist China
The Similarities — Land Reform: the government takes land from landowners & gives it to large corporations through a blend of fascism & socialism. Suicide Epidemic: among young people in the USA, suicide is the 3rd most common cause of death; among all Americans, suicide claims more lives than car accidents which were previously the leading cause of death. Media Suppression & Targeting: groups are targeted by the IRS for having opposing views & in the mainstream media you cannot speak out against the Obama regime. Only Those In Government Prosper: government workers get paid 45% more than workers in the private market; the Washington, DC area has 6 of the 10 most affluent counties in the USA. Lies & Statistics: all government statistics are heavily manipulated -- 23% is the real unemployment figure. Famine & Starvation: 1 in 6 Americans & 1 in 4 children are on food stamps.


Obama’s USA Is Starting To Look Like The Grim Early Days Of Mao’s Communist China

Obama’s U.S. Is Starting To Look Like The Early Days Of Mao’s Communist China

March 21, 2014 by The Dollar Vigilante —Personal Liberty Digest

Many people like to watch movies or read novels as a way to relax and get away from work and other stresses of day-to-day life. I, on the other hand, find nonfiction to be much more interesting than almost anything dreamed up by a fiction writer. So when I want to relax and get away from things, I like to read nonfiction books and documentaries.

Given what is going on in China lately, I have been nearly obsessed with learning about China’s history. It is easily one of the most interesting cultures on Earth, with thousands of years of dynasties, warlords, communism, capitalism, wars and atrocities.

Of all the atrocities, the worst by far was committed during Mao Zedong’s Communist China revolution and the typically Orwellian-named, "The Great Leap Forward."

That leap eventually ended up with the deaths and starvation of somewhere between 20 million and 45 million people. Despite this devastation, American oligarch David Rockefeller said this of the period: "Whatever the price of the Chinese revolution, it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also in fostering high morale and community of purpose. The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao’s leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history."

As I watched a recent documentary on this period, it struck me how eerily similar the early years of Mao, leading to those deaths, were to today’s United States and Obama.

The Similarities

Hope and change: As with Obama, Mao was swept into power under great fanfare as a savior by a society of people who had been so impoverished and war-torn that they put their faith in this man with his ideas. As with Obama, the first few years didn’t go too terribly, giving some people hope. But soon after taking power in 1950, Mao quickly got China involved in the Korean War.

Land reform: During that same period, Mao went to work on taking land away from landowners and giving it to the people. Done differently, but with the same end goal, the U.S. has been decimating small-farm owners through regulations, taxes and even armed raids, ending up with large corporations owning more and more of the productive land. The large corporations, through the U.S. blend of fascism and socialism, end up owning more and more of the land. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the number of farms in the United States has fallen from about 6.8 million in 1935 to only about 2 million today. According to Farm Aid, every week some 330 farmers leave their land for good. This isn’t done as overtly as it was during Mao’s time of just killing landowners, as the U.S. government has perfected propaganda; but the end result is essentially the same.

Suicides: In Shanghai during that time, suicide by jumping from tall buildings became so commonplace that residents avoided walking on the pavement near skyscrapers for fear that suicides might land on them. In the U.S. today, even The New Yorker writes about the "suicide epidemic." Between 1999 and 2010, the number of Americans between the ages of 35 and 64 who took their own lives rose by almost 30 percent. Among young people in the United States, suicide is the third most common cause of death; among all Americans, suicide claims more lives than car accidents, which were previously the leading cause of injury-related death.

Media suppression and targeting: Mao launched the "Hundred Flowers Campaign" urging all those with different opinions to express themselves. It was a ruse, however; and he used this to target opponents, eventually killing 500,000 landowners. In the United States it is done differently; but groups, like the Tea Party, have been targeted by the Internal Revenue Service for having opposing views. And it is well known in the mainstream media that you cannot speak out against the current regime. Journalist Abdulelah Haider Shaye was imprisoned under Obama’s orders for speaking out about U.S. involvement in the Mideast. And, currently, according to Reporters Without Borders, the U.S. stands at No. 46 on the World Press Freedom Index, just after Romania and one ahead of Haiti.

Only those in government prospered: During Mao’s time, it was said that only those in government and those in the capital cities connected to the government prospered. This is very similar to what is happening today in the United States. Government workers currently get paid 45 percent more than their counterparts in the private market. And while most of the country languishes in depression-level conditions, Washington, D.C., is flourishing. The Washington metro area includes a whopping six of the 10 most affluent counties in the Nation.

Lies and statistics: As things got worse in Mao’s China, the government took to overtly lying about nearly every statistic. It lied egregiously about crop production and the number of deaths due to starvation. Doctors were not allowed to list "starvation" as a cause of death. In the United States it is similar in that nearly all government statistics are heavily manipulated to paint a better picture of what is really going on. Unemployment figures, for one, are adjusted so that if people give up looking for work they are not counted as being "unemployed" anymore. The U.S. government currently says that the rate of unemployment is 7.3 percent. However, the percentage of the population that is employed is at lows not seen in 40 years. And computing the unemployment numbers the way they were computed prior to 1994 (before they took out "long-term discouraged workers" from the figures), as computed by Shadowstats.com, shows an unemployment rate of 23 percent.

Famine and starvation: As things got worse, by the end of the 1950s, tens of millions of Chinese died of starvation. The United States has much more past wealth to live upon and still has the printing of the U.S. dollar to keep things more afloat temporarily; but even with these advantages, one in six Americans is on food stamps. And 1 in 4 children in the United States is on food stamps. In other words, already, a very large percentage of the population cannot even afford food to eat without assistance. Without government assistance, they would starve.

The Differences

It should be said that China in the mid-20th century and the United States in the early 21st century are two very different places. China, at that time, was a very poor and backward place, whereas the United States — due to semi-free markets for centuries — is incredibly advanced and has built up a lot of wealth.

As well, communication technologies such as the Internet do not allow most government’s today to wholesale slaughter people. In the United States today, these same goals are undertaken through fines, taxation, regulation, inflation and criminalizing nearly every human activity. Nearly half of all people under the age of 23 in the United States today have been arrested, and the U.S. has the world’s largest prison population (25 percent of the prisoners, yet only 5 percent of the world population). Through these means, the U.S. government can look to be less heinous than it would by outright murdering thousands or millions of people but essentially with the same results.

Because of these differences, we should not expect to see the United States follow the exact same path of Mao’s China. But the similarities of the two times are striking.

Spend! Spend! Spend!: The U.S. government has been spending and going into deficits at rates that would have shocked people even 15 years ago. The debt of the U.S. government has increased $6.666 trillion since Obama took office. When Obama was first inaugurated on Jan. 20, 2009, the debt of the U.S. government was $10,626,877,048,913.08, according to the Treasury Department’s Bureau of the Public Debt. As of Jan. 31, the latest day reported, the debt was $17,293,019,654,983.61 — an increase of $6,666,142,606,070.53. The total debt of the United States did not exceed $6.666 trillion until July 2003. In the little more than five years of the Obama Presidency, the U.S. has accumulated as much new debt as it did in its first 227 years.

Blame the capitalists: Fomenting a class war, the heavily socialist-indoctrinated youth and poor are constantly told "greedy corporations" are causing their problems. This can be seen clearly in all the recent minimum wage rhetoric.

Junk the constitution: The Constitution and the Bill of Rights have been all but ransacked in recent years — specifically since 9/11 and the Patriot Act. People collecting rainwater or building a pond on their own property or living sustainably off the grid have been deluged by Federal agencies threatening them with massive fines or jail time. And the rising police state and the endless accounts of police brutality are just other examples of this.

Declare a dictatorship: Obama continues to wage wars without approval from Congress, issue executive order edicts and create kill lists. And in his most recent State of the Union address, he even went so far as to say that he was going to go around Congress to get things done… all to wild applause. That is a dictatorship.

The Fall Of America

Those plans, as laid out in the Chicago Tribune cartoon from 1934 are falling exactly into place. That, combined with the fact that Obama’s U.S. is following a very similar path to Mao’s China should be enough to make the hairs on the back of your neck stand up.

Unfortunately, it only keeps getting worse. Capital controls are coming into effect in July under the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA); so if you don’t have yourself or your wealth well outside of the United States by this point, your time is running out.

For this reason, The Dollar Vigilante has set up an urgent conference called the Crisis Conference, scheduled for April 30  to May 4 in Cabo San Lucas, Mexico. If you still have significant assets inside the United States, I urge you to seriously considering attending.

The U.S. is currently similar to the early days of Mao. How it ends up is anyone’s guess, but it isn’t going to be pretty.

– Jeff Berwick





Obama Is Creating A Communist Social State and Destroying America By Implementing A Radical 8 Step Plan
1) Healthcare [the most important]– Control healthcare & you control the people. 2) Poverty– Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control & will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live. 3) Debt – Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, & this will produce more poverty. 4) Gun Control – Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state. 5) Welfare – Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, & Income). 6) Education – Take control of what people read & listen to – take control of what children learn in school. 7) Religion – Remove the belief in God from the Government & schools. 8) Class Warfare – Divide the people into the wealthy & the poor. This will cause more discontent & it will be easier to take (Tax)


Obama Is Creating A Communist Social State and Destroying America By Implementing A Radical 8 Step Plan

How To Create A Social State By Saul Alinsky:

Obama writes about Salinsky in his books and Hillary Clinton did her college thesis on his writings.

Saul Alinsky merely simplified Vladimir Lenin's original scheme for world conquest by Communism under Russian rule. Stalin described his Communist converts as "Useful Idiots". The Useful Idiots have destroyed every nation in which they have seized power and control; now the Useful Idiots -- led by "An Useful Idiot's Idiot" known as Barack Obama -- have seized power and control in the USA and are systematically destroying America along with the American Dream.

Alinsky says that there are Eight Levels Of Control [listed below] that must be attained before you are able to create a communist social state and that the first [healthcare] is the most important.

All eight of these are presently being implemented at an "alarming pace" in the USA.

1) Healthcare – [the most important] - Control healthcare and you control the people.

2) Poverty – Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live.

3) Debt – Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty.

4) Gun Control – Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state.

5) Welfare – Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income).

6) Education – Take control of what people read and listen to – take control of what children learn in school.

7) Religion – Remove the belief in God from the Government and schools.

8) Class Warfare – Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor.





White Voters Are Abandoning Obama In Droves: Not because of the color of his skin but because the color of his incompetent, fraudulent, lying policies is red — communist red
Are all white voters who don’t support Obama racists? The very definition of racism is voting for a black candidate because he’s black; that’s racism. The fact that 92% of black voters voted for Obama & 96% of black women voted for Obama is racism. White voters are not abandoning Obama in droves because of the color of Obama’s skin but because the color of his policies is red - as in communist red. I hate the policies of Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Clinton & Harry Reid; that does not mean that I hate women or Mormons. White, middle-class Americans are suffering because Obama’s policies are those of of an incompetent, fraudulent, lying Marxist; we don’t care about the color of his skin. That’s why among Americans who are not Kool-Aid drinkers blinded by the color of his skin, Obama’s poll numbers are the lowest in history.


White Voters Are Abandoning Obama In Droves: Not because of the color of his skin but because the color of his incompetent, fraudulent, lying policies is red — communist red

White Voters Abandon Obama In Droves

March 13, 2014 by Wayne Allyn Root —Personal Liberty Digest

Watch the video here — http://personalliberty.com/2014/03/13/white-voters-abandon-obama-in-droves/ — or read the text of it below:

Hello, I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. Have you seen Barack Obama’s poll numbers? They are among the lowest in history. As of last week, Obama’s approval rating is at 38 percent. That’s just barely above Richard Nixon. But that’s not the big story here.

Keep in mind that Obama has the support of about 35 percent to 40 percent of the population that will never abandon him — no matter what he does, no matter how bad the jobs numbers look, no matter how low the economy goes, no matter how much scandal and corruption are exposed, no matter how strong the facts are against him. Nothing will ever change their minds. These are the "low-information voters" of the Democratic Party.

In many cases, they love Obama because of the color of his skin — and nothing else. They will never abandon a black President — even though black unemployment is at record levels; even though black youth unemployment is at record levels; even though black poverty is at record levels; even though Obama’s exact policies have been in place for more than 50 years in Detroit (a majority black city run by black Democrat politicians) and the black population has been devastated, destroyed and discarded, left for dead in an abandoned, bankrupt city with very few streetlights operating and the police leaving residents in many areas to fend for themselves.

So just think about those poll numbers for a moment. Let those numbers sink in. If 35 percent to 40 percent of the population would support a Democrat for President if he ran from a prison cell, if 35 percent to 40 percent would support Obama no matter what he does, no matter how far America sinks under his leadership (even if they have no jobs and their own lives are in total misery), how could Obama’s approval rating be at only 38 percent?

That means that among the rest of America, outside of loyal, lifelong, Kool-Aid-drinking Democrats, Obama’s ratings are nil. Among voters who don’t identify as Democrat, he is the lowest-rated President in history. No numbers like this have ever been recorded, if you filter out the Kool-Aid-drinking low-information and partisan voters.

Obama’s approval among the heartland of America (middle-class Americans) is lower than Nixon’s, lower than George W. Bush’s, lower than Lyndon Johnson’s at the height of the Vietnam War, lower than Jimmy Carter’s at the height of the Iranian hostage crisis with the added burden of an economy in misery and malaise.

I’m betting that outside of lifelong Democrats and welfare recipients (I know; I repeat myself), Obama’s ratings are in the unimaginable range of single digits.

I’m betting that outside of food stamp recipients, Obama’s ratings are in the single digits.

Among the white middle class, I’m betting Obama’s ratings are in the single digits… or lower.

Keep in mind many of the white middle class originally voted for Obama. He could not have been elected without white support.

Among those who actually own small businesses, pay most of the taxes and create most of the jobs, I’m betting Obama’s ratings are in the vicinity of zero.

Actually, if you take the white middle class and subtract out a few Ivy League intellectuals, Hollywood liberals and pathetic Upper West Side of Manhattan Democratic zombies, there are few Obama supporters left to be found anywhere in America.

Remember that about 47 percent of Americans get entitlement checks from government. Obama is paying for their support and he still has only 38 percent approval. You know you’re unpopular when even bribes don’t work anymore!

This man has managed to pull off something remarkable and historical: He has alienated almost every single American who actually works for a living and pays taxes, outside of Chicago, Manhattan, Hollywood and Detroit. He has virtually zero support among the 53 percent who aren’t getting a check from government. You can’t find another instance of that in the history of American politics.

Obama is amazing!

Now… one last bit of housekeeping. I do want to answer my critics whose only response will be: "All of these white voters who don’t support Obama are racists. It’s all about race."

First of all, the very definition of racism is voting for a black candidate because… he’s black. That’s racism. The fact that 92 percent of black voters voted for Obama and 96 percent of black women voted for Obama is nothing but voting based on race.

As far as white voters abandoning Obama in droves, I’ve yet to meet one white voter who bases it on the color of Obama’s skin. We all base it on the color of his policies. The color of his policies is red — as in communist red. We hate his policies, not the man and not the color of his skin.

We hate the record-setting $12 trillion in debt he’ll have piled up by the time his second term is finished, because Obama has ruined the future of America with that debt. And he’s ruined our children’s future quality of life with that debt. We hate Obama’s big tax increases for the middle class and small business, and the fact that those tax increases haven’t helped the economy or created new jobs because the money was handed to Obama’s voters and donors — for more entitlements, more welfare, more food stamps, bailouts, stimulus and wasted failing green energy "investments."

We hate the fact that Obama has killed millions of jobs. We hate the fact that the economy is in ruins under his leadership, except for Wall Street. Of course, Wall Street goes up because Obama has directed the Fed to print trillions in fake dollars to make his biggest donors richer than they ever imagined.

We hate the fact that Obama ruined the finest healthcare system in the world, which about 80 percent of Americans were happy with in the first place. We hate the fact that he is a liar and fraud who promised "if you like your health insurance, you can keep it." Now we either don’t have insurance, or our prices have been raised through the roof. He has damaged our lives beyond belief. The color of his skin has nothing to do with it. But the facts have everything to do with it.

Over the years, I hated the policies of George McGovern and Jimmy Carter. They were both white. So did that mean I hated whites? Today, I hate the policies of Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid. Does that mean I hate Italians and Mormons? I hate the policies of Hillary Clinton. Does that mean I hate women? I hate the policies of Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Shultz and Senator Chuck Schumer. Does that mean I hate Jews? Well guess what? I’m Jewish. There goes that argument.

And I hate the policies of Joe Biden. Does that mean I hate idiots? I’m just kidding… kind of.

The point is in every case, it’s the politics and policies that we hate — not the person or the race. So the argument is just plain misleading, fraudulent and stupid.

It all comes down to common sense. White, middle-class Americans are suffering because of the policies of an incompetent, fraudulent, lying Marxist. And we’re not in delusion and denial, simply because we’re not blinded by the color of his skin. The fact is we don’t care about the color of his skin. So we can see the plain truth.

That’s why Obama’s poll numbers are amazing. That’s why among Americans who are not Kool-Aid drinkers blinded by the color of his skin, Obama’s poll numbers are the lowest in history.

I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. God bless America.





Obama Is Arrogant & Egotistical: He is a President who thinks of himself as too smart, too gifted, too important and too busy to give a damn about his job, or the economy, or the American people. Those are all things only "the little people" have to do
As President Obama has played 163 rounds of golf and rarely attends vital meetings, while America is at war, while Russia threatens World War III, while the economy is in shambles, while millions of people have given up hope of ever working again, while record numbers of Americans are living in poverty, while black unemployment is double that of white, and while food stamps, welfare, disability and all entitlements soar to record levels. We have a President who thinks of himself as too smart, too gifted, too important and too busy to give a damn about his job, or the economy, or the American people. He's even too important to have to bother to check in every night. Those are all things only "the little people" have to do.


Obama Is Arrogant & Egotistical: He is a President who thinks of himself as too smart, too gifted, too important and too busy to give a damn about his job, or the economy, or the American people. Those are all things only "the little people" have to do

Obama At Columbia Story Explains Arrogant Attitude

March 20, 2014 by Wayne Allyn Root -- Personal Liberty Digest

 

Watch the video here -- http://personalliberty.com/2014/03/20/obama-at-columbia-story-explains-arrogant-attitude/ -- or read the text of it below:

Hello, I'm Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty.

I told you so.

Thirty years ago, Barack Obama, my Columbia University Class of 1983 classmate, was rarely seen. Thirty years later, he can't be bothered to attend national security meetings about a crisis that could lead to World War III.

Some things never change.

You might ask, "What do Obama's college days have to do with his Presidency today?" The answer is everything.

By college, a person's personality, attitude and behavior is usually fairly well set. That's why Obama's Columbia days tell us so much about his behavior as President today.

What do I know about Obama at Columbia? Nothing. I never met him. As I've reported countless times, I was a political science major and pre-law at Columbia from 1979-1983. Even though I thought I knew everyone in the political science department, neither I nor any of my friends at Columbia ever met or saw Obama there.

At the 30th class reunion last May, I tracked down legendary Columbia history professor and Presidential historian Henry Graff. For 46 years, all the American political leaders who attended Columbia were in Professor Graff's classes. Not Obama. Graff never met him, never saw him, never heard of him.

The problem is Obama defenders and the media (I know, they're the same) interpreted what I said wrongly. I never said Obama didn't attend Columbia. I said he was never in class. I said while it was strange only one or two students, one professor and one foreign exchange student (who was his roommate off campus) claim to have ever seen him at Columbia, they prove he most probably attended the university. I'm sure he wouldn¡¯t be the first college student to rarely, if ever, attend classes. I said he was like "the ghost of Columbia."

What it means is simple. Obama is exactly the same today as he was as a student at Columbia thirty years ago: arrogant and egotistical. He's either too lazy, or he thinks he's too smart, to have to actually do the work expected of him. Nothing has changed in 30 years.

I'm sure he was rarely ever in class at Columbia because he had more important things to do. Besides, he already knew everything. Obama has always believed Obama is brilliant and better than the rest of us. What more could Columbia teach him?

It's the same today. He rarely attends important meetings. In the past two weeks, he's skipped two national security meetings focused on Russia's invasion of Ukraine, a crisis that could lead to World War III. Yet our President chose not to attend.

Do you think this is conservative propaganda or exaggeration? Hardly. Obama's absence from both national security meetings was reported by many media, including Reuters.

Why did Obama skip the first meeting? He chose to attend a White House Film Festival. Just like during his days at Columbia University, Obama had more important things to do.

Even if Obama isn't impressed by Russia's invading Ukraine, certainly he finds America's jobs crisis important, right? Wrong. Obama could find no time to meet about the sky-high unemployment in America either. Even leftist Huffington Post reported in July 2012 that Obama had not convened a meeting of his jobs council in six months.

POLITICO updated the report in January 2013: Obama never bothered to convene one meeting of his own jobs council in a full year, even with unemployment and underemployment at crisis levels.

Even more remarkable, within two weeks of that story, Obama closed down his jobs council -- with 12 million Americans still counted officially as unemployed.

With more than 92 million working-age Americans not working, and men suffering the lowest workforce participation rate since record-keeping began, Obama thought it unimportant to even continue having a jobs council.

So what was important in Obama's life? Golf and fundraisers. PolitiFact.com, the nonpartisan fact checker, confirmed our President golfed 10 times and attended 106 fundraisers during just the original six-month period when he could find no time, or interest, to attend even one meeting of his own jobs council. Can you imagine the updated numbers for the full year?

And where was he the night of the Benghazi attack? Both Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Martin Dempsey testified Obama was absent that night.

Four brave Americans died while Obama was "absent." What could be more important than a U.S. consulate under attack with American lives at stake? What could be so important that Obama never checked in to ask a question or discuss a rescue attempt from 5:30 p.m. Eastern time until the next morning (when everyone was dead)?

Just like his college days, Obama believes he's too gifted to do the actual work of President. He's just too busy to have to worry about unemployed Americans. He's just too important to have to bother to check in every night. Those are all things only "the little people" have to do.

History will show that George W. Bush, the man the leftist media painted as "arrogant, elitist and out of touch," played 29 rounds of golf as President, until quitting in August of 2003 out of respect for the troops in harm's way.

Meanwhile, Obama, "the man of the people," has played 163 rounds of golf and counting, while America is at war, while Russia threatens World War III, while the economy is in shambles, while millions of people have given up hope of ever working again, while record numbers of Americans are living in poverty, while black unemployment is double that of white and while food stamps, welfare, disability and all entitlements soar to record levels.

Nothing has changed since Columbia University -- not Obama's personality, not his attitude, not his behavior.

We have a President who thinks of himself as too smart, too gifted, too important and too busy to give a damn about his job, or the economy, or the American people -- either that or he does care. And he's not in our corner. I'll let you decide.

I'm Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. God bless America.





Treacherous Obama Is Rushing To Accelerate The Destruction Of America: Obama is no longer hiding the fact that he is a tyrant, dictator, communist and hater of America, capitalism and Judeo-Christian values
Obama is no longer hiding his plans to destroy America. Why the sudden rush for Obama to accelerate the destruction of America? His internal polls show Democrats are headed for a landslide defeat in November now that the disastrous effects of Obamacare are clear for the voters to see. Knowing Democrats can no longer get elected, or re-elected, Obama has decided to go it alone. Without regard for the law, the Constitution or the American people, he obviously has decided to do the most damage possible to America during his final 3 years. The evil and terrible news is coming in waves. And it’s all coming from Obama — a man no longer hiding the fact that he is a tyrant, dictator, communist and hater of America, capitalism and Judeo-Christian values. The question is: Who will stop him?


Treacherous Obama Is Rushing To Accelerate The Destruction Of America: Obama is no longer hiding the fact that he is a tyrant, dictator, communist and hater of America, capitalism and Judeo-Christian values

Is Obama Accelerating The Collapse Of America?

February 20, 2014 by Wayne Allyn Root  — Personal Liberty Digest

Watch the video here — http://personalliberty.com/2014/02/20/is-obama-accelerating-the-collapse-of-america/ — or read the text of it below:

Hi, I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. In my latest book, The Ultimate Obama Survival Guide, released in spring 2013, I called Barack Obama a "stealth Marxist" out to destroy capitalism and make Americans dependent on government. This wasn’t just guesswork. Obama and I were classmates at Columbia University, where we were taught how to overwhelm the system until the economy collapses with spending, debt and entitlements. In my book, I called Obamacare the perfect "Trojan Horse" that would make it all happen.

Have you paid attention to the Obama news of the past week? It’s amazing. It’s mind-boggling. It’s unimaginable. It was a week of unimaginable destruction.

The cloak is off. Obama is no longer hiding his plans to destroy America. For anyone who isn’t blind, deaf or very dumb, it’s now all out in the open.

The news of this past week proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that Obama is accelerating the destruction of America. Why the sudden rush? Obama and his Marxist cabal see the writing on the wall. Their internal polls show they are headed for a landslide defeat in November. Now that the disastrous effects of Obamacare are clear for the voters to see, they know Democrats are about to be destroyed at the polls.

Knowing Democrats can no longer get elected, or re-elected, Obama has decided to go it alone. Without regard for the law, the Constitution or the American people, he and those pulling his strings behind the scenes have obviously decided to do the most damage possible to America during his final three years. He’s finally taken off the mask and shown himself to be the true communist tyrant he is.

Look At The Facts

This week the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office finally reported the truth: Obamacare is the perfect job-killing machine. Millions of people have already been downsized from full-time to part-time work, and now we know from the CBO that an additional 2.3 million jobs will be eliminated. As I predicted from Day One, this is exactly what Obamacare was intended to do: destroy the middle class and make us all dependent on government checks to survive.

Obama’s Kool-Aid-drinking supporters are so far in the tank that when the CBO courageously pointed out that Obamacare makes it less likely millions of Americans will want to work, they called it "choice." Obama’s propagandists painted it a wonderful development. But letting middle-class wage earners and small businesses pay for all those who want to be freed from the need to work, so they can enjoy their free time and pursue their hobbies isn’t "choice." It’s theft.

Folks, it is time to stop treading lightly and being politically correct. Let’s call it what it is. This is communism, pure and simple. Anyone who thinks the American dream is to choose to stay home, not work and collect a government check is reading directly from Karl Marx. Anyone who thinks some people (who vote 100 percent Democrat) should have a "choice" not to work, by stealing the money of others, is reading directly from The Communist Manifesto.

Personally, I think "choice" is great. You can choose to not work anytime you want. But if you need to steal my money to do it, that’s called theft, not choice. Middle-class wage-earners are being ripped off to pay for freeloaders. That means middle-class people are having their "choices" taken away from them. I guess in Obama’s playbook one man’s choice is another man’s slavery.

But that was only the start of the week. Next, Obama illegally rewrote his own Obamacare lawagain. Mimicking the traits of communist dictators and tin pot tyrants, Obama obviously believes he can change any law he wants, at any given hour, of any given day. One of the main chapters of my book was titled: "America the Banana Republic." Just this week, Charles Krauthammer said what’s happening under Obama "is the stuff you do in a banana republic." Welcome to the club, Charles. It’s nice to see D.C. establishment Republicans are finally seeing the light.

In America it’s a violation of the Constitution for the President to wake up on the wrong side of the bed and decide to make, arbitrarily change or break laws. This is the behavior of Fidel Castro, or the late tyrant Hugo Chavez.

But wait; it gets far worse. As part of the new illegal Obamacare directive to postpone the law for businesses with 50 to 99 employees, Obama put the Internal Revenue Service in direct control of critical U.S. business decisions. He demanded that businesses must "justify" hiring and firing decisions to the IRS to qualify for the exemption. Plain and simple, putting government in charge of the decisions of a private business is the very foundation of communism. It is how communist economies like North Korea, Cuba, the old Soviet Union and East Germany have always been run.

Still, Obama wasn’t done. To show his total distain for Congress and the American people, he unilaterally loosened the rules for citizenship to allow foreigners with only a "minor" connection to terrorism to become citizens. Dennis Miller once said on "Monday Night Football," "There is no such thing as a minor groin injury." Well there is no such thing as a "minor" terrorist either.

Why is our President desperate to open the borders and let in "minor" terrorists? It’s not like we have a surplus of jobs. What is the pressing need in a country with 92 million unemployed working-age Americans? Has corporate America put out an emergency request for "minor" terrorist employees? Or is this how Obama creates instant Democratic voters?

Much along the same lines, Obama’s Attorney General Eric Holder announced this week how "unjust" it is to not allow felons to vote.

No, Mr. Attorney General, the only thing "unjust" was the crimes these felons committed. What’s the emergency here? Is there a shortage of Democratic voters? Obama’s game plan is clearly to combine felons with radical Muslim terrorists in order to guarantee Democrat dominance for years to come.

This was just one week in America. The evil and terrible news is coming in waves. And it’s all coming from one man — a man no longer hiding the fact that he is a tyrant, dictator, communist and hater of America, capitalism and Judeo-Christian values.

Obama no longer cares to hide his radical Marxist ideology. It’s now clear it’s "pedal to the metal" toward the destruction of America.

The question is: Who will stop him?





Obama And America’s Other Black Leaders Are Race-Baiting, Guilt-Mongering, Lying Liberals
When are we there yet with the collective white guilt over the treatment of African-Americans for the past 300 years? When can we stop harping about it in everything? There really is not much hope for a deadline, especially when the sins of the father seem to stretch to perpetuity & when the non-solutions provided by some of the influential voices in black America sound a lot more like Joseph Goebbels than Mahatma Gandhi. What about blacks who are racists; is it OK for them to hate whites forever. So many race-baiting, muck-raking, money-making ways in which blacks have been let down by their self-appointed leaders & have not had to face up to their own responsibilities. Race relations are worse now than when Obama was first elected. Meanwhile, white resentment grows along with black anger. That sets the stage for race tensions & even race riots.


Obama And America’s Other Black Leaders Are Race-Baiting, Guilt-Mongering, Lying Liberals

America’s Black Leaders Are Race-Baiting, Guilt-Mongering, Lying Liberals

March 5, 2014 by John Meyers — Personal Liberty Digest

Last week, President Barack Obama announced the "My Brother's Keeper" initiative.

And the LORD said unto Cain, Where is Abel your brother? And he said, I know not: Am I my brother’s keeper? — Genesis 4:9

"I’m not my brother’s keeper," my mother used to say. She and my father survived the Great Depression. Through decades of hard work, they made themselves a comfortable life. But a higher authority than my late mother, President Barack Obama, believes we are our brother’s keeper.

Last week, Obama launched his initiative that will create opportunities for young black and Hispanic men. His explanation is that this is a way he is going to help those two minorities in an economy racked by civil discord. And his program is being hailed as the "My Brother’s Keeper" initiative. The Obama Administration will partner with foundations, nonprofit groups and businesses to equal the playing field for blacks and Hispanics.

The program should be called Big Brother because it focuses on a single leader, who happens to be black, who has decided by himself that young black and Hispanic youths are going to be given special advantages. If you are white, Native American or Asian, tough luck. In true Muslim tradition, Obama is not giving a hand up to young women of any race.

According to the President, groups have already invested $150 million into the program and will invest another $200 million over the next five years. And there is no stopping it; Obama has already signed an order to establish the My Brother’s Keeper Task Force, which will determine how to help black kids help themselves. It sounds discriminatory and self-aggrandizing for the President, who was shameless while presenting it.

"Fifty years after Dr. [Martin Luther] King [Jr.] talked about his dream for America’s children, the stubborn fact is that the life chances for the average black or brown child in this country lags behind by almost every measure and is worse for boys and young men," said the President.

This is just the latest publicity stunt by Obama so that he can, with a wave of a wand and a few hundred million dollars, change black fortunes. Until now, he has been remiss in doing so, unless it added to his legacy.

Obama’s Sermon On The Mount

TIME reported:

Last February, Obama met with a group of young men at Hyde Park Academy on Chicago’s South Side, who were a part of the Becoming a Man program within the school. He spoke candidly with the group about his experiences, acknowledging the fact that as a man of color who was raised by a single mother, their lives were inherently similar. The only difference, he said, was the fact that he grew up in an environment that was more forgiving.

When I went to high school, I must have missed Becoming a Man Day. I got those lessons from my father when I was young enough that discipline still mattered, before age 12 and not 17. During his long business trips for his magazine, my mother was his XO, always at the ready with the big, old, sterling-silver brush. I must have gotten 30 spankings growing up, but I earned them all. More importantly, they stopped when I was 11 after I had begun to associate my bratty behavior with a sore butt.

Every good parent knows that how his kids turn out depends on how they are raised as little children — not because of some feel-good Presidential plan set up for young men who are way too old to now learn values such as hard work, respect and personal integrity.

Furthermore, is Obama omnipotent? How does he know which environment is the most forgiving? I think black kids are taking hardly any of the blame these days, and it’s being pushed on to the whites. Lately, everything is Whitey’s fault. If some white man killed some poor, innocent black kid, it will be plastered all over the TV media for months, maybe years. And on it goes the direct and indirect message that the laws are written and the police are there to protect Whitey. Therefore, Whitey is at the root of every social injustice. America’s black leaders bang that war drum louder each day.

America could have better race relations without black leaders like Obama, Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and Oprah Winfrey forever mucking in the past and making white people feel guilty, while black people feel victimized.

Are We There Yet?

If you have children, you must have heard a thousand times on any trip, "Are we there yet?!" One of my first memories dates back to when I was 3 and I was sitting in the middle seat between my older brother and sister flying two hours from Calgary to Vancouver, Canada, to meet our parents. The last hour I wanted a minute by minute update: "Are we there yet?!"

What I want to know is when we are there yet with the collective white guilt over the treatment of African-Americans for the past 300 years? When can we stop harping about it in everything from the NFL to the Academy Awards, to the policies cooked up by the Oval Office? Can just somebody give us a date that we can put this in our past? After all, the whites who committed those crimes are either dead or soon will be. And if we cannot ever put it into our past, how were we so able to forget the genocide we did to Native Americans?

The truth is I don’t hold out much hope for a deadline, especially when the sins of the father seem to stretch to perpetuity and when the non-solutions provided by some of the influential voices in black America sound a lot more like Joseph Goebbels than Mahatma Gandhi.

Just read what Winfrey had to say regarding the racism "problem" when interviewed by the BBC in November shorty before she received the Medal of Freedom from Obama:

Of course, problem is not solved. You know, as long as people can be judged by the color of their skin, the problem’s not solved. As long as there are people who still — and there’s a whole generation; I say this, you know, I said this, you know, for Apartheid South Africa; I said this for my own, you know, community in the South — there are still generations of people, older people, who were born and bred and marinated in it, in that prejudice and racism, and they just have to die.

Sins Of The Father, You Know?

Oprah, who do you want to see die? Just old people? What about younger people whose parents may have had them "bred and marinated in it (racism)." Do they have to die, too? And who gets to decide who is a racist and who is not? What if we find out, Oprah, that you are a racist? Is it possible you hate the Swiss because they treated you shabbily in that Zurich shop when you just had to have that $38,000 handbag last summer? If so, do we have to wait for you to die before racism is gone?

And then there is the question of blacks who are racists. Is it OK for them to hate whites, given decades of discrimination and centuries of slavery, which, by the way, ended 148 years ago?

It doesn’t seem productive when black leaders like the President and Winfrey make excuses about male black youths and do not hold them to the same accountability as white youths. Yet there are other black leaders just as bad as Obama and Winfrey.

Blacks are still being treated so poorly, said Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan to a crowd of 18,000 in Detroit last month, that African-Americans should have their own court system.

"Our people can’t take much more. We have to have our own courts. You failed us," Farrakhan said.

"How long must we let people stand their ground, shooting us and getting away with it while we don’t get justice?" added Farrakhan. "We want justice. Equal justice under the law. We want the federal government to intercede to see that black people get justice in accordance with the law. Otherwise, I’m going on record with this today… we have to have our own courts."

What’s next? Separate courts for Hispanics? How about for Asians? I am a Canadian-American. Do I get to go trot off to my own courthouse if I get in trouble?

These are all race-baiting, muck-raking, money-making ways in which blacks have been let down by their self-appointed leaders and have not had to face up to their own responsibilities. The result is that race relations are worse now than when Obama was first elected. He bears responsibility in this, but he has had plenty of help from the likes of Winfrey, Farrakhan and many others — all of them spreading the message of irreversible shame against white America as a weapon to press their liberal agenda.

Meanwhile, white resentment grows along with black anger. That sets the stage for race tensions and even race riots. Maybe that was the intention from the start.

Yours in good times and bad,

–John Myers





An Expanded Investigation Of The Real IRS Scandal Will Lead To The Impeachment Of Obama: Obama’s IRS scandal makes Nixon look like a minor league rookie
The 2nd of Richard Nixon’s Articles of Impeachment was for the crime of using the IRS to punish his political opponents. The difference is that Obama’s IRS scandal makes Nixon look like a minor league rookie. Congress needs to expand this investigation since the real scandal is that this was a widespread criminal conspiracy by the Obama White House to use the IRS to target, persecute, intimidate and silence Obama’s critics and political opposition — good Americans with names and faces and families — whom they tried to destroy and intimidate. That’s why Obama doesn’t want that story in the news. He wants this to be about only Tea Party groups that have been made so unpopular. But this “IRS Targets The Tea Party” story is a distraction from a much bigger and more dangerous scandal. The real scandal will lead to the impeachment of Obama.


An Expanded Investigation Of The Real IRS Scandal Will Lead To The Impeachment Of Obama: Obama’s IRS scandal makes Nixon look like a minor league rookie

I Have The Smoking Gun In The IRS Scandal

March 6, 2014 by Wayne Allyn Root — Personal Liberty Digest

Watch the video here —http://personalliberty.com/2014/03/06/i-have-the-smoking-gun-in-the-irs-scandal/— or read the text of it below

Hello, I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. Internal Revenue Service official Lois Lerner finally agreed to testify in front of Congress. (Lerner invoked her 5th amendment right and refused to testify.) Still, the media and Republicans in Congress are missing the larger picture. They keep thinking this scandal involves the nameless, faceless Tea Party groups that have been demonized by President Barack Obama and his allies. That’s why Congress needs to expand this investigation.

The real scandal is that this was a widespread criminal conspiracy by the Obama White House to use the IRS to target, persecute, intimidate and silence Obama’s critics and political opposition.

And I believe I personally have the smoking gun to tie the Obama White House to this scandal.

Congress needs to ask Lerner and other IRS officials about the targeting of individual critics of Obama — good Americans with names and faces and families — whom they tried to destroy and intimidate… people like me. That story will resonate with the American people.

That’s why Obama doesn’t want that story in the news. He wants this to be about only Tea Party groups that are so unpopular. But this "IRS targets the Tea Party" story is a distraction from a much bigger and more dangerous scandal. The real scandal will lead to the impeachment of Obama.

The second of Richard Nixon’s Articles of Impeachment was for the crime of using the IRS to punish his political opponents. Don’t look now, but we’ve got another Nixon in the White House. The difference is that Obama’s IRS scandal makes Nixon look like a minor league rookie.

Tea Party groups are just one part of this widespread conspiracy. I was personally targeted along with many others, including Dr. Benjamin Carson; former GOP Senate candidate Christine O’Donnell; a stage 4 terminal cancer victim (after appearing on FOX News); conservative filmmakers like Jerry Mullen (Dinesh D’Souza’s partner) and Joel Gilbert; Christian ministers like Billy Graham; Catherine Engelbrecht, who was targeted more than 15 times by the IRS and other government agencies after founding her Tea Party group; and numerous prominent GOP donors. The list goes on and on.

There is a clear pattern of a criminal conspiracy here. This was an organized crime conspiracy that would make Al Capone and the Gambino crime family proud. The only question is: Can Obama be connected? If he can, this becomes the biggest scandal in modern U.S. political history.

Let me tell you about my personal situation. I spent three years (2011-2013) under nonstop attack by the IRS. I first wrote about it last spring.

I may not be the most high-profile Obama critic in the country, but my opinions are read by millions at many of the most popular news, business and political websites in the country, like Personal Liberty. Last year, my book The Ultimate Obama Survival Guide became a national bestseller.

The result of all of this nonstop media exposure? An unprecedented IRS attack starting in January 2011. This IRS attack was so overzealous and out of bounds, I was forced to hire one of the Nation’s top tax law firms. My legal team took the case to tax court, where we won a complete victory. Five days later, the IRS announced a new tax audit. I’m not a billionaire or a wheeling, dealing hedge fund CEO. I’m just a small businessman, but someone in the Obama Administration thought I needed to be silenced.

Multiple legal and tax experts confirmed they had never heard of an American taxpayer being attacked by the IRS in such a manner only five days after winning in tax court. Furthermore, they all agreed this could happen only if I was on Obama’s "enemies list."

The attack was chilling, intimidating and very expensive. It was meant to bleed me dry and teach me a lesson: If you dare to criticize Obama, get ready to lose everything.

Here is where my case may differ from others. Obama and the IRS left a trail. I may have the smoking gun to connect Obama to the scandal.

Smoking Gun No. 1

Unlike any other IRS targets, I was Obama’s classmate at Columbia University. And I never hesitated to express my theories about Obama’s scandals at Columbia. My commentaries and theories were widely covered by conservative media like Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, Mike Huckabee, Bill Cunningham and even Geraldo Rivera.

I’ll leave it for you to decide, but is it possible that my criticisms of the President hit too close to home. And as his college classmate appeared all over the media hitting him hard, he noticed. I got under his skin. And Obama or his top aides (see Valerie Jarrett or David Axelrod) ordered the IRS to make my life miserable. I think it’s not only possible, I think it’s probable.

Don’t forget; this Obama socialist cabal plays by Chicago rules of dirty assignation politics. Also never forget they sent the IRS to attack a stage 4 terminal cancer patient who appeared once on FOX News to criticize the President. I made thousands of appearances in the media, including dozens per year at FOX News.

Regardless of how you feel about my criticisms of the President, even if you hate me and even if you think all of my opinions are wrong, a President can’t order the IRS to target a citizen for his political beliefs. If either Obama or his top aides gave the orders, a crime was committed. Nixon’s Articles of Impeachment make that clear.

Smoking Gun No. 2

As my second IRS attack was winding down and I was winning once again, the IRS auditor handling my case in California received a very unusual phone call. On the other end of the call was one of the most important IRS officials in the country. He called to demand the IRS auditor wrap up my case immediately.

Why was one of the top officials in the IRS interested in closing my case? Why would a top IRS official intervene in an "unimportant" local audit? How would a top IRS official even know about my case? What would make him take an interest? If he never saw the details of my case, why would he be interested in closing it as quickly as possible?

I consulted several tax experts again. They all concluded that top IRS officials never intervene in local cases unless a call is made by someone at the very top of the food chain — either the White House or a U.S. Senator.

Interestingly, this happened two weeks before the IRS scandal broke all over the national news.

Did whoever was giving the IRS its marching orders panic and decide to bury my case before the national media started snooping around? Did someone in the White House make that call?

Smoking Gun No. 3

Since then, Judicial Watch, the leading government watchdog organization in the country, jumped on board my case. Judicial Watch agreed my case looked suspiciously like a classic case of IRS persecution and intimidation ordered by highest levels of government. It partnered with me to find out the truth, including whether the IRS trail leads directly to the Obama White House.

Judicial Watch requested all files, records, correspondence, phone calls, etc. relating to my case on Aug. 7, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act.

By law, the IRS had 30 days to comply. That was well more than half a year ago. It’s been more than half a year of silence.

The IRS is refusing to cooperate with the law of the United States of America.

Why would the IRS risk breaking the law rather than releasing my files? Something smells rotten in D.C.

It’s not difficult to find out where this trail leads. Ask any prosecutor what comes next. Squeeze the people at the bottom to give up the names at the top. Put them in front of Congress and under oath and ask: "Who gave the orders and why?" Then, move up the chain of command. I’m betting this case leads to the White House.

Oh, and be sure to ask IRS officials what about my case is so important that they’d be willing to break the law by refusing to respond to our Freedom of Information Act request.

After all that, I don’t place the blame on the IRS. Obama has used them as scapegoats. He threw the IRS under the bus. He blamed "rogue agents" out of the Cincinnati, Ohio, office. He’s lying through his teeth. My case involved the Las Vegas office of the IRS.

And there are no "rogue agents." Most government employees are good people. Career bureaucrats would never risk their pensions to harass or persecute taxpayers without orders from above.

The IRS employees who handled my appeals in California and at U.S. Tax Court were honest, fair and professional. I have nothing but good things to say about them.

The other IRS agents who tried to destroy me were undoubtedly ordered to do so. I’m sure they felt that their careers were at risk if they didn’t follow orders from the top levels of government.

The buck stops with the Obama White House. It had all the power and the motive. That’s where the criminal act occurred. I believe the Obama White House directed this widespread witch hunt — not just of me, but of hundreds of other critics of the President and major GOP donors.

Then, when it got caught in a criminal conspiracy, it tried to distract the media with the Tea Party story… and blame the little guys at the IRS. Suddenly, lower-level employees just following orders were "rogue agents." How low can you go? The IRS was used by Obama and then thrown under the bus. These agents are victims, too, of an out-of-control tyrant as President.

Watergate proved even the President isn’t above the law. This IRS scandal may yet prove Obama isn’t too big to jail.

I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. God bless America, a country where no one is too big to jail, not even the President.





Do Equal Rights Really Exist For The “Majority” In PC America?: Where the "majority" must tolerate and teach the beliefs of the minority or be punished and labeled bigots by the government and the media, but where the "minority" need not tolerate nor teach the beliefs of the majority and are rewarded and acclaimed heroes by the government and the media
Believe that equal rights do exist for the “majority” in PC America? Try getting official approval for a large group to march in a major American parade bearing a prominent banner declaring We’re Proud To Be White, We’re Proud To Be Heterosexual, We’re Proud To Be Males, We’re Proud To Be Christians, We’re Proud To Be Gun Owners, or We’re Proud To Work For A Living. We have come full circle in this country, with the "minority" demanding “tolerance” and becoming absolutely intolerant of anyone who disagrees with them. Welcome to the new tyranny of the minority!


Do Equal Rights Really Exist For The “Majority” In PC America?: Where the "majority" must tolerate and teach the beliefs of the minority or be punished and labeled bigots by the government and the media, but where the "minority" need not tolerate nor teach the beliefs of the majority and are rewarded and acclaimed heroes by the government and the media.

The Tyranny Of The Minority

February 28, 2014 by Chip Wood — Personal Liberty Digest

Chalk up another victory for the gay and lesbian lobby. They managed to stir up so much of a ruckus that Arizona Governor Jan Brewer vetoed a measure the State Legislature passed to safeguard the religious liberty of its citizens.

Senate Bill 1062 was designed to protect Christian business owners from being forced to provide goods or services when to do so would violate their religious beliefs. Such a measure became necessary, its supporters said, because Christian photographers, bakers and florists had been punished for declining to provide services for gay weddings.

State Senator Steve Yarborough, one of the sponsors of the bill, said: "This bill is not about allowing discrimination. This bill is about preventing discrimination against people who are clearly living out their faith."

In cases in Oregon, Washington and New Mexico, business owners were found guilty of violating the civil rights of gays for refusing to provide their services for a gay wedding. In some cases, they were fined thousands of dollars for discriminating against gay customers.

And it isn’t just private businesses that are under the gun of the homosexual lobby. So are many public charities. Catholic Charities came under attack when it said it would not violate the teachings of its faith by placing children in the homes of same-sex couples. When it was ordered to do so, it chose instead to shut down its foster care and adoption services in several States. When the charity closed its doors in Illinois, Bishop Thomas Paprocki said, "In the name of tolerance, we’re not being tolerated."

Indeed, that is precisely what increasingly is happening all across this county.

Once the State Legislature in Arizona passed SB 1062, the floodgates opened against Governor Jan Brewer, demanding that she veto the bill. John McCain and Jeff Flake, the two Arizona Senators, denounced the measure. So did Mitt Romney, the 2012 Republican nominee for President. Newt Gingrich, another prominent Republican politician, said the same thing.

Three Republican legislators in Arizona who had voted for the measure said they had changed their minds. In a letter to the Governor, they said that their intent had been "to create a shield for all citizens’ religious liberties." Instead, they noted, "[T]he bill has been mischaracterized by its opponents as a sword for religious intolerance."

Many businesses, including Apple and American Airlines, joined the chorus urging Brewer to veto the measure. Even the National Football League got involved, threatening to move the 2015 Super Bowl from Phoenix to some other, more gay-friendly State unless she vetoed the bill.

Faced with all of these strident demands, it isn’t surprising that Brewer buckled. Very few politicians could have withstood the pressure she faced.

In announcing her decision, the Governor said, "My agenda is to sign into law legislation that advances Arizona." While she believes strongly that "religious liberty is a core American and Arizona value," she added, "So is non-discrimination."

Here is how she explained her decision to veto: "To the supporters of the legislation, I want you to know that I understand the long-held norms about marriage and family that are being challenged as never before." She recognized that "Our society is undergoing many dramatic changes."

But then she added, "However, I sincerely believe that Senate Bill 1062 has the potential to create more problems than it purports to solve. It could divide Arizona in ways we cannot even imagine and no one would ever want."

Demonstrators outside the State capitol building in Phoenix erupted in cheers when Brewer’s decision was announced.

We have come full circle in this country, with the people demanding "tolerance" becoming absolutely intolerant of anyone who disagrees with them. If, because of your religious convictions, you decline to participate in a gay wedding, it’s not enough to insist you violate your conscience. No, these new forces of intolerance say you must be punished.

Welcome to the new tyranny of the minority.

Until next time, keep some powder dry.

–Chip Wood





Obama, The Media, Congress, John Boehner, The Establishment GOP And The Debt Ceiling Itself Are Full Of Crap: If we don’t act fast, they will all soon flush America and the American dream forever down the crapper
Have you ever had a sewage pipe break? If the raw sewage kept pouring out and piling up to your ceiling, would you hire contractors to raise your ceiling or would you ask them to correct the problem: to fix the broken pipe and clean the piles of crap out of your home? Raising the ceiling of your home would be incredibly stupid; it would cost hundreds of thousands of dollars. It would change the entire construction of your home. Most importantly, it wouldn’t solve your problem. If you raised the ceiling but didn’t fix the broken pipe, you’d spend $100,000 on the higher ceiling. But two weeks later, they’d have to raise it again. They would have to raise it again and again, until you’d spent more than $1 million on ceiling raises on a $100,000 home that is still full of crap.


Obama, The Media, Congress, John Boehner, The Establishment GOP And The Debt Ceiling Itself Are Full Of Crap: If we don’t act fast, they will all soon flush America and the American dream forever down the crapper

Obama And The Debt Ceiling Are Both Full Of Crap

February 13, 2014 by Wayne Allyn Root — Personal Liberty Digest 

Watch the video here — http://personalliberty.com/2014/02/13/obama-and-the-debt-ceiling-are-both-full-of-crap/ — or read the text of it below:

I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. The debt ceiling debate is upon us again. And once again you are being fed a line of crap. Barack Obama is full of crap. The media are full of crap. Congress is full of crap. John Boehner and the establishment GOP are full of crap. And the debt ceiling itself is one big load of crap. It’s all a big lie. Let me explain in simple terms anyone can understand.

Have you ever had a sewage pipe break? If the raw sewage kept pouring out and piling up to your ceiling, would you hire contractors to raise your ceiling or would you ask them to correct the problem: to fix the broken pipe and clean the piles of crap out of your home?

Raising the ceiling of your home would be incredibly stupid; it would cost hundreds of thousands of dollars. It would change the entire construction of your home. Most importantly, it wouldn’t solve your problem. If you raised the ceiling but didn’t fix the broken pipe, you’d spend $100,000 on the higher ceiling. But two weeks later, they’d have to raise it again. They would have to raise it again and again, until you’d spent more than $1 million on ceiling raises on a $100,000 home that is still full of crap.

Right now, I’m sad to say, America is full of crap.

The Republican chief coward, House Speaker John Boehner, just gave in to Obama again (as he always does) and got nothing in return (as he always does). It’s as if this debate is actually a choreographed acting performance. The loser is America. You’ve been fed a load of crap.

They’re all lying to you, trying to distract you from the truth. The issue isn’t the debt ceiling. That’s only the result. The actual problem is out-of-control government spending. In only five years, Obama has added $6.6 trillion to the national debt. Debt is like sewage. It is bad stuff. It carries disease. It stinks. It’s a cancer or a curse upon whoever touches it.

Here’s what this so-called debt ceiling fight is about. Government has a sewage leak. Raising the ceiling is a big mistake, because no one is fixing the problem. The problem is stopping the raw sewage before it spreads fatal disease and causes a catastrophic epidemic that brings about an economic collapse. Debt has already destroyed the so-called PIIGS of Europe: countries like Greece, Italy, Spain and Portugal. They are drowning in debt. By raising our debt ceiling, we are making the exact same mistake, heading in the exact same direction. We are Greece, except much bigger. Debt will destroy us too, but our collapse will take the entire world down with us. The debt ceiling is a ticking time bomb. Each time we raise the debt ceiling, we are closer to the implosion.

Raising the ceiling again proves that Obama is a failure. It proves that Obama is reckless and irresponsible. It proves that Obama is spending us into bankruptcy. It proves that Obama is once again (what a surprise) a liar. He claims to have cut spending. But the fact we are at the debt ceiling again proves we raised spending. It proves that even the infamous "sequester," which Obama claimed cut too much spending, actually never cut enough. If we actually cut any substantial spending, why would we need to raise the debt ceiling? Obama and the media don’t want you to ask that question. They need to distract you.

No one cut spending. If anyone had actually cut spending, then why are we out of money again? The politicians called a cut in the increase in spending "a cut in spending." But it’s not actually a cut in anything. It’s just more spending.

Or in this analogy of a house with a broken sewer pipe, it’s just more sewage. What if your plumber allowed 50 percent more sewage to pour out of the pipe into your house, but he told you that’s better than 100 percent more sewage? What if he bragged that he’d slowed the sewage leak into your house? Would that work? Or would your home still be destroyed by sewage — just a little slower. Would you want to sleep in a bedroom covered in 2 feet of raw sewage, instead of 4 feet? Would you sleep soundly? Of course not, because that didn’t solve the problem.

That’s what is happening to America. We are overloaded with crap. And our ceiling is going to soon explode and take the economy — and your job — with it. The very act of raising the debt ceiling means you’re spending and printing too much money. You’re in debt. And in a matter of months, you’ll need to raise the roof again.

The politicians tell us about all the threats to our country if we don’t raise the ceiling. But the reality is the ultimate national security threat is out-of-control debt. Raising the ceiling doesn’t solve the problem; it allows the problem to get worse. It encourages more spending. It delays the inevitable: a massive debt crisis that causes the collapse of America.

Obama, his socialist cabal, big-government proponents and the media (I know I repeat myself) all have a vested interest in lying to you. They desperately need the reckless spending to continue to bribe their voters. That’s how they stay in office, by perpetuating a massive Ponzi scheme. They desperately need more fake money printing to keep the Ponzi scheme going. They desperately need to distract you from seeing the truth: that government spending is the problem, and the way to solve the problem isn’t raising the ceiling; it’s fixing the pipe.

How do we fix the pipe? We slow the spending. We cut government. We actually — get ready for this — must spend less than we take in. No one in the hysterical media has ever mentioned this simple, alternative solution.

Raising the ceiling is one way to go; fixing the pipe is the other. Which one would you go with in your own home?

Yes, folks, the debt ceiling is a pile of crap. And so is the entire Obama agenda. And if we don’t act fast, so is the American dream.

I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. God bless us and save us from the communists, socialists, liars, con men and idiots running America into the ground.





PC America: Where unfair is fair, immoral is moral, dumbed-down is educated, dictatorial is democratic, male is female, female is male, un-Christian is Christian, un-biased criticism of non-whites by whites is racism, bigotry by non-whites is not bigotry, homosexuality indoctrination is not indoctrination, and the minority is the majority
Companies are forced to hire unqualified people & ignore highly qualified people who have lighter skin. Boys are told that they are stunted for acting out their natural male impulses & girls are told that true femininity is weakness & that they should act more masculine. Young adults who are coddled & infantilized, young girls who think promiscuity is the key to womanhood & motherhood is disgusting, & young men who have no testicular fortitude with no clue how to take charge of their own lives. The American family unit has been destroyed with women who are ashamed to set aside careers to raise children & with men who abandon their children. And a weak-


PC America: Where unfair is fair, immoral is moral, dumbed-down is educated, dictatorial is democratic, male is female, female is male, un-Christian is Christian, un-biased criticism of non-whites by whites is racism, bigotry by non-whites is not bigotry, homosexuality indoctrination is not indoctrination, and the minority is the majority

The Twisted Motives Behind Political Correctness

February 18, 2014 by Brandon Smith —Personal Liberty Digest

As I have confessed in the past, in my early years I found myself active in the Democratic Party and the general liberal methodology. I had no understanding of the concept of the false left/right paradigm. I had no inkling of the dangers of globalism and central banking. I had no concept of decentralization or non-participation. I had never even heard of libertarianism. I knew only that George W. Bush was a criminal (and I was right), but the problem went far deeper than the GOP. I was astoundingly ignorant of the bigger picture.

However, what I did have going for me was an almost violent sense of nonconformity. I hated collectivists, yet I found myself surrounded by them while working within the leftist culture. It was the insanity of self-proclaimed "liberals" that taught me the true nature of the facade of politics. When I realized that the Democrats were essentially the same corrupt entity as the neoconservatives, everything in my life changed.

One aspect of liberalism with which I am now very familiar is political correctness. I didn’t understand it at the time, not until I stepped outside the cultism of it and looked in from a wiser place. It always bothered me, but I couldn’t quite grasp why until later. Then, it hit me like a revelation. Political correctness was not a political ideology. No, it was a religion, a full-fledged spiritual con, a New Age ghetto of frothing mishmash that is sociological voodoo. And the leftists were eating it up like steak night at an all-you-can-eat buffet.

These people were rationally retarded. Every idea they proposed they merely parroted from books and articles they had read. They were like malfunctioning automatons trapped in a cycle of discontented social criticism. Their desperation to invent meaning in the midst of their irrelevant lives made me feel ill. If they could not find a legitimate cause to champion, they would create one out of thin air and defend it relentlessly, regardless of how shallow it truly was.

When I outline my analysis of economic destabilization within the United States or I write about the rise of the police state, I am driven by a fundamental sense of concrete concern. There are indeed real problems in the world, swirling in a storm of obvious factual conflicts. But the warriors of the PC culture don’t see any of it. Rather, they fantasize about injustices that don’t exist, trespasses that are ultimately fictional. They imagine themselves champions of some greater purpose that, in the end, doesn’t matter.

Recently, I read a news story about a "transgendered teen" in Maine. When the boy was in the fifth grade, he decided to dress as a girl and demanded to use the girl’s bathroom at his public school, despite having the biological apparatus of a male. This story was international news, folks! Why? I can’t say, except that the mainstream media have made a point to focus on "gender optional" issues as if they represent some kind of civil rights uprising.

The issue perfectly illustrates the disturbing nature of politically correct culture.

Teachers at the school did not deny the student the use of restroom facilities. In fact, they allowed him to use the teacher’s bathrooms to avoid any confusion. The Maine Supreme Judicial Court, on the other hand, had other ideas. It ruled that the school’s refusal to allow the boy to use the girl’s facilities constituted a violation of the State’s anti-discrimination law. The ruling has been heralded as a massive victory for the politically correct narrative.

Now, let me make one thing clear: I could not care less about this boy’s sexual orientation (if he even has one). I do think the very idea that a fifth-grader at about the age of 10 is sexually conscious enough to develop a sense of gender dissuasion is absurd. Children who haven’t even experienced puberty yet, proclaiming they are transgendered? Utter nonsense. I find it far more likely that the student’s PC-obsessed parents influenced him to come to such a decision despite his naivety.

That said, a person’s sexual proclivities are not my concern. In fact, I have no interest whatsoever in the infatuations of any individual. That is a personal matter. I do not judge such people on their attractions. I do, though, judge people on how they handle their infatuations. What happens when someone wears his sexuality on his shoulder like a fashion accessory? Why is that even necessary? Is it not rather mentally backward for any person to base his public persona solely on his carnal compulsions? Do I dance around on the sidewalk bellowing to strangers how much I love the curves of women? Do I require a sociopolitical legal apparatus to vindicate my existence? Do I feel the need to shame gay people into publicly embracing my straight man’s libido? No, I do not.

The PC culture demands that we, as individuals, openly accept the sexual orientations of anyone and everyone; otherwise, we are labeled prejudiced monsters. It is not enough that we object in a logical manner. No, we must fall to our knees and thank the stars for the very existence of gender chameleons.

In the end, the psychological gender position of any particular person does not overrule his biological features. A child with a penis is a boy. Period. He will never be a girl. Ever. Not without surgical aid. And even then, he will never have the ability to give birth, which is the very hallmark of femininity. (Sorry, feminists, but that’s how it goes.) A boy, no matter his mental orientation, does not belong in a girl’s lavatory. The privacy rights of the girls outweigh the gender confusion of the boy. If I were a girl (why not play some gender games since everyone else is), I would beat the living hell out of any boy gallivanting in a dress in a bathroom I was using and make sure he never dared come back. And, by extension, if I were a rather mischievous boy with an aptitude as a peeping tom, why not dress up in a tutu in the hopes of getting a glimpse of the forbidden while being legally protected by the State?

The warped conflicts that arise, though, are not the creation of the child in question. A fifth-grader has no concept of gender rights or political correctness. This issue was a creation of the PC cult and its acolytes. These people don’t actually care about the children they involve in their legal dramas. They exploit them, with every intent to abandon them once they have chiseled their agenda into the gray matter of every American.

What truly motivates these people? Why do they do what they do? I think my experience with leftists makes me a well-positioned observer of the psychology of the culture. Here are the hidden thought processes I have witnessed while dealing directly with the PC army.

PC Elitism

One of the unfortunate side effects of religion is that proponents often use it as a means to feel superior to others. I have seen it in Christianity as much as I have seen it in any other belief system. It is the primary reason why I refuse to subscribe to organized and establishment-sanctioned spiritualism. Religion should be a personal experience first and foremost, not an easy way to fit in with the collective. Communing with others who share one’s beliefs should be secondary. Hypocritically, politically correct adherents often criticize Christians for their collectivist elitism while suffering from the same problem themselves.

PC culture allows participants to pretend as though they have some greater understanding of the world, an elevated knowledge of life that makes them superior to the uninitiated. It is important to understand that when a person pursues the methodology of zealotry, he doesn’t do it to make the world a better place; he does it to feel better about his place in the world.

The politically correct are so violent in the assertion of their ideals because they crave the subjugation of the mainstream and a recognition of their "rightness." They don’t want people to "accept" their beliefs as tolerable. They want people to adore their beliefs as supreme. They want every man, woman and child to reinforce their ideals without question.

The malfunction of this philosophy is that zealots are never satisfied. They must always find new ways to feel superior to others. So they continuously engineer new taboos and new sins, no matter how ridiculous, so that they can forever look down upon the laymen. Because of this, there will never be an end to PC law. It will go on forever, labeling numerous social interactions and stances as "aberrant" — never satiated and never satisfied.

PC Futurism

The young are always searching for ways to feel wiser than the old. This is just the natural way of things, at least in America. Now, I know from ample experience that age does not necessarily denote intelligence. I’ve met plenty of idiotic people who had decades of time to learn from their mistakes but didn’t. But the young, many of whom lack time and struggle, have a terrible tendency to either pretend that they have "seen it all." Or they pretend that the very atmosphere of the day somehow gives them a greater insight than generations past. The reality is that most of them know very little of import. This attitude comes from a philosophy called "futurism" (popular with the Nazis and the Soviets), which holds that all the beliefs and discoveries of the past mean nothing compared to the beliefs and discoveries of the present. This ideology is alluring to the young, because it gives them a way to feel intellectually dominant over older and more "ignorant" people who are "behind the times."

Political correctness is basically an appendage of futurism. By labeling elders as social bigots and products of a barbaric era who don’t understand the "lingo" of the PC elite, liberalism draws in and collectivizes the fledgling left. Younger generations are given a cultural avenue toward high priesthood, a right of passage usually reserved for the aged. They get to skip ahead past all the trials and tribulations of life and announce their deep awareness of the so-called greater good.

The values of forefathers past become archaic scrawlings of racist and prejudiced cavemen who could never appreciate the "brilliance" of today’s academia. The inherent freedoms of natural law that have existed since time began are nothing more than obstacles to them, standing in the way of a new and better world where they have somehow outsmarted human instinct and centuries of history.

PC Collectivism

The very foundation of political correctness is solidified in a desire for the perpetual reinforcement of one’s worldview. PC people need every other person around them to sing the praises of their pure virtues. If I happen to disagree with the idea of gender bending, for instance, as some kind of socially persecuted subculture that needs overt government protection, then I am, of course, labeled a hateful Neanderthal. If I stand in opposition to the concept of victim group status in general, in which the state demands that designated "minorities" be given special treatment regardless of the status of the individual, then I become a racist political fossil ignorant of the bigger picture. You see, if you disagree with PC culture in any way (even if that way is rational), you cannot win. To refute political correctness is to refute the god of the New Age; and to refute their god, even with concrete logic, is blasphemy.

This kind of blind faith in political correctness lends itself entirely to collectivism. The average person begins to think that without a viable appreciation of the philosophy, he may be left out or cast aside. Most people do not know how to function without the approval of others. Therefore, even if a father happens to have a healthy skepticism over the idea of a make-up wearing fifth-grade boy waltzing into his daughter’s school bathroom, he is likely to keep his mouth shut, because to speak out would be a risk to his position within the group, or the community.

PC Control

The prevalence of PC philosophy is not subtle. I have always found it interesting that political correctness seems to consistently support the demands of the state. Our system smothers children with it in public school, our workplaces are rife with the propaganda for fear of lawsuits and colleges are veritable breeding grounds for the PC oligarchy. Politically correct culture goes out of its way to constantly test others to make sure they are also true believers.

The truth is some discrimination is healthy, and some discord is needed for a society to remain balanced. As long as we don’t allow our disagreements to end in the physical harm of others, then those disagreements are our natural-born right. If you are a racist (this goes for non-whites as well), that’s fine. Just don’t act out your racism in a violent way around me, or I will have to put you down permanently. If you have a distaste of homosexuality (or asexuality, as seems popular nowadays), then whatever, I don’t care. You shouldn’t have to have organizations like GLAAD (formerly the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation) in your face attempting to force you to put on a smile for gaydom, coordinate man-on-man heavy-petting protests in your favorite restaurant (Chick-fil-A) while you’re trying to eat a damn sandwich, push boys into the girl’s bathroom, or trying to shut down your favorite TV shows because the stars happen to share your views ("Duck Dynasty").

Now, PC proponents will argue that the very existence of bigotry does harm to society as a whole, and it must be educated out of individuals. Frankly, I see that kind of utopian fascism as a far greater threat to society as a whole than bigotry ever will be.

Look at where we are today because of the PC nightmare! We have a Nation on the verge of industrial and economic collapse, partly because companies are forced by law or persuaded by government subsidies to hire people with victim group status, even if they are unqualified, while ignoring highly qualified people who just happen to have lighter skin. We have children not even old enough to discover their own inherent character being clinically diagnosed with "gender dysphoria" by a psychiatric community of quacks, which conjured most PC terminology out of thin air. We have boys who are told that they are stunted for acting out their natural male impulses and girls who are told that true femininity is weakness and that they should act more masculine. We have a mainstream culture that coddles and infantilizes young adults, young girls who think promiscuity is the key to womanhood and that motherhood is disgusting (which I find rather ironic), and young men who have no testicular fortitude and no clue how to take charge of their own lives.

The American family unit has been completely destroyed. We have women who are ashamed to set aside careers to raise children because feminism frowns upon "breeders" who bring down the whole gender. We have men who abandon their children and refuse to take responsibility. And we have a weak-minded population addicted to collective affirmation and unwilling to think outside the box for fear of being shunned and shamed. Honestly, I can’t see a single redeeming quality to political correctness other than the fact that those people who espouse it do so loudly and obnoxiously, making it easier for me to identify and avoid them or to take special note of them as an obvious zombie threat in an America swiftly declining into mundane oblivion.

–Brandon Smith





Obamacare Is A “Poverty Trap”: For millions of Americans it will make unemployment and government welfare more attractive than working
Obamacare will make unemployment more attractive than working for more than 2.3 million Americans in coming years given the new taxes and other incentives they will face and the financial benefits some will receive. For some the incentive to not climb the economic ladder will be especially strong, as earning just $1 more than 400% of the Federal poverty line could drive their insurance costs up by as much as $20,000 a year. Individuals earning less than 400% of the Federal poverty line are eligible for healthcare premium subsidies, but those subsidies taper dramatically if earnings rise above that threshold. People whose income exceeds 400% of the FPL are ineligible for premium subsidies, and for some people those subsidies will drop abruptly to zero when income crosses that threshold.


Obamacare Is A “Poverty Trap”: For millions of Americans it will make unemployment and government welfare more attractive than working

Poverty Trap Or Job-Lock: Obamacare Will Be Costly For Those Ineligible For Subsidies

February 7, 2014 by Sam Rolley -- Personal Liberty Digest  

The Congressional Budget Office revealed this week that Obamacare is expected to make unemployment more attractive than working for more than 2.3 million Americans in coming years. For some Americans the incentive to not climb the economic ladder will be especially strong, as earning just $1 more than 400 percent of the Federal poverty line could drive their insurance costs up by as much as $20,000 a year.

The nonpartisan budget watchdog reported that Obamacare "will raise effective tax rates on earnings from labor," while also creating incentive for some Americans to sign up for government benefits instead of seeking employment.

"CBO estimates that the ACA will reduce the total number of hours worked, on net, by about 1.5 to 2 percent during the period from 2017 to 2024, almost entirely because workers will choose to supply less labor — given the new taxes and other incentives they will face and the financial benefits some will receive," CBO analysts said in their economic outlook.

The CBO noted in its report that individuals earning less than 400 percent of the Federal poverty line are eligible for healthcare premium subsidies, but those subsidies taper dramatically if earnings rise above that threshold: "People whose income exceeds 400 percent of the FPL are ineligible for premium subsidies, and for some people those subsidies will drop abruptly to zero when income crosses that threshold."

A recent analysis by The Weekly Standard explored one extreme example of how Obamacare could disincentive gainful employment when subsidies disappear:

Take the case of a couple of 55-year-olds living in St. Croix County, Wisconsin, where the median household income is a little over $68,000.

Let’s say that they earn $62,040 in 2014. They would pay $211 per month for the cheapest Obamacare plan available on healthcare.gov. …

But if they earn $62,041–just one dollar more–they would pay $1,342 per month. That’s an extra $13,572 per year for the same bare-bones insurance plan. …

The cost of crossing the threshold of subsidy eligibility will vary based on age. For a couple in their 30s, according to healthcare.gov, it might only cost you a little over $4,000. For a couple of 64-year-olds, who are a year away from qualifying for Medicare, falling over the subsidy cliff could cost more than $20,000.

The CBO’s most recent Obama revelations are expected to take center stage in the run-up to the 2014 midterm elections.

Republicans like House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan said the CBO report shows that Obamacare is a "poverty trap."

"I guess I understand ‘better off’ in the context of healthcare. But ‘better off’ in inducing a person not to work who is on the low-income scale, not to get on the ladder of life, to begin working, getting the dignity of work, getting more opportunities, rising their income, joining the middle class, this means fewer people will do that," he said during a Wednesday hearing.

Meanwhile, Congressional Democrats have championed the report, saying that it will eliminate so-called job-lock and give Americans the freedom to follow their dreams.

**Comment on the last paragraph: Either following their dreams or just sitting on their butts, it is going to be paid for by hard-working taxpayers who get rewarded for doing something rather than doing nothing.





Obama’s Delusional And Fraudulent State of The Union Speech Was Disgusting, Embarrassing, Plagiarized and Overflowing With Lies
The biggest outrage of the night was Obama’s getting a standing ovation from Democrats for promising to violate the Constitution; ignore checks & balances; and bypass the people, Congress & the law of the land to pass radical & extreme parts of his agenda by executive orders. Some of the facts that Obama’s nonstop lies and fraud ignored: food stamp rolls are growing 75 times faster than the job rolls; the number of working-age Americans without a job has increased by 10 million under Obama; inflation is running rampant; gas bills have doubled; electricity is at all-time highs; Obamacare causes people to lose their policies, doctors & lifesaving drugs, or to have their insurance cost doubled or tripled; military vets’ pensions are being cut; green energy bankrupted Spain; and Obama’s critics are either persecuted, intimidated or indicted.


Obama’s Delusional And Fraudulent State of The Union Speech Was Disgusting, Embarrassing, Plagiarized and Overflowing With Lies

Obama’s State Of The Union: Lies And Theft

January 30, 2014 by Wayne Allyn Root  

Watch the video here — http://personalliberty.com/2014/01/30/obamas-state-of-the-union-lies-and-theft/ — or read the text of it below:

I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. My, how the mighty have fallen. I was going to report on all the lies in Barack Obama’s State of the Union speech. But it appears he’s more than a pathetic liar; he’s actually a thief, too. Obama started out his career at the Brandenburg Gate in Germany with thousands watching. Now, he plagiarizes George W. Bush’s speeches? That’s a pretty long fall.

Large swaths of this speech appear to have been lifted directly from Bush’s 2007 State of the Union. So says Bush’s speechwriter — and he should know his own words.

Now from plagiarism, we move to the original lies of Obama. The question is: Does he believe this stuff? Obama actually reported the U.S. economy is in "recovery." Bernie Madoff has nothing on this guy. In Obama’s economy the food stamp rolls are growing 75 times faster than the job rolls!

Obama said there are 8 million new jobs. Maybe he’s counting people who have stopped looking for work forever, as "getting a job."

I have news for you, Mr. President: They didn’t get a job. They went on disability, food stamps or welfare… probably all three. There are almost 100 million working-age Americans not working. That’s almost exactly how many Americans are on entitlements. Coincidence?

Obama said the unemployment is the lowest in five years. Another whopper. The fact is the number of working-age Americans without a job has increased by almost 10 million in Obama’s first five years as President. That means each and every year of Obama’s Presidency, 2 million more Americans just disappear from the workforce. That’s a neat trick. I’m sure David Copperfield is impressed.

Obama says every business owner should give a big raise to our employees. With what? The economy is in free-fall. Business is dramatically down for every business owner I know. We can’t make payroll. We can no longer afford health insurance. Inflation is running rampant. Our gas bills have doubled. Electricity is at all-time highs.

Because of you, Mr. President, our health insurance bills have doubled or tripled.

And he wants us to give our employees a raise? We’re lucky if we can keep the doors open.

Obama introduced some pizza parlor owner who gave his employees a raise.

I don’t know where you found him. Perhaps he’s an actor you rented for the day. But I know a pizza parlor owner, too. His four sons work for him. He paid $800 per month for health insurance for his family until Obamacare came along. His new bill? $2,400 per month. He’s dropping all his insurance. I guess he didn’t make the cut to be introduced at the State of the Union.

Of course, your Obamacare law helped a few people that you introduced in the audience. It wasn’t easy finding them, was it? But for each person your healthcare law has helped, thousands have been hurt or ruined. They’ve lost their policies, doctors, lifesaving drugs, or had their cost raised to unaffordable levels, or had their deductibles raised dramatically. It wouldn’t have been hard to find one of those victims. Senator Tom Coburn was sitting in the audience. He has cancer. He just lost his doctor because of Obamacare.

You said you "saved" the auto industry. Another whopper. You stole tens of billions of taxpayer dollars to save auto union pensions. It was pure theft. Anyone could "save" any industry by stealing billions of dollars from taxpayers and handing the money to your biggest campaign donors.

Obama said he is ordering Treasury to create some new savings bond IRA for working-class people. Great. Where will they get the money? Will they cash in their food stamps for the savings? Even if working class Americans did have any extra money, this is just a new scheme to steal their retirement money. Now instead of throwing your Social Security money away to a program going broke, working people can give the government even more retirement money to steal. Obama will "borrow" it to pay more food stamps and welfare bills and leave you with another worthless IOU.

Obama said that the National Security Agency is not violating the privacy of ordinary Americans. Of course not, the NSA is only violating the rights of Republicans and leading critics of the President. The rest of you can go about your business.

Obama says we support Ukrainian citizens’ fight for free speech. Unfortunately, he doesn’t support Dinesh D’Souza’s right to free speech here in America. He’s the conservative filmmaker who created the documentary "2016: Obama’s America." He was just indicted.

In Obama’s America, critics are either persecuted, intimidated or indicted.

But perhaps the biggest lie of all was Obama’s crooning about solar power. Spain is the green energy capital of Europe. Their whole economy is based on green energy. The result is more than 27 percent unemployment and more than 56 percent youth unemployment. I can’t wait to replicate the Spanish economy!

Finally, Obama ended with a sweet tribute to an injured war vet. Obama loves and honors our vets while he purges the military of any officer who disagrees with him. And he cuts pensions for military vets so he can spend more on food stamps, disability, welfare and, of course, give a billion dollars to foreign companies to build and fix the defective Obamacare website.

But the highlight of the night was Obama’s getting a standing ovation from Democrats for promising to violate the Constitution; ignore checks and balances; and bypass the people, Congress and the law of the land to pass radical and extreme parts of his agenda by executive orders. Save that video of Democrats cheering wildly for Obama to break the law; it will make for one heck of a GOP television advertising campaign this fall. I’d be sure to show them cheering in slow motion.

This, folks, is the state of our union… and the state of delusion and deception in Obama’s America. Disgusting. Embarrassing. Misleading. Criminal. And even a little plagiarism thrown in for good measure.

I guess outside of the nonstop lies and fraud, Obama just didn’t have any original material.

I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. Same time, same place. God bless America.





Racial Divider Obama Thinks We’re Stupid Enough To Believe That His Approval Rating Has Hit A Record Low Because Of His Skin Color
Think about it. What if Obama had been white? Do you think there’s any chance that an obscure white politician from Illinois would have been elected President? If Obama had been white, do you believe the media would have ignored his very dubious associations or his lack of any real accomplishments? Do you think he would have been given a pass on such mysteries as the grades he got in college or why he can’t produce an authentic birth certificate? No, Obama’s skin color has nothing to do with his plunging popularity. On the contrary, Obama was elected President precisely because he was black. Had voters known about his far-left policies and what he actually believed, there’s not a chance he would have been elected. Only because he was able to hide his Marxist associations and his far-left agenda is he sitting in the White House today.


Racial Divider Obama Thinks We’re Stupid Enough To Believe That His Approval Rating Has Hit A Record Low Because Of His Skin Color

Conservative? You Must Be Racist, Extremist

January 24, 2014 by Chip Wood  

Why has Barack Obama’s popularity come crashing down? In a recent Gallup poll, the President’s approval rating hit a record low — below anything that either George W. Bush or his father experienced. The only President in modern times to get a lower rating was Richard Nixon, shortly before he resigned.

Why such abysmal ratings? Do you think it might have anything to do with the far-left policies Obama has pursued? His disastrous healthcare program? The National Security Agency spying scandal? Or maybe the use of the Internal Revenue Service to intimidate conservatives?

No, according to the man himself, none of those are the reason why his approval ratings have plummeted. When asked by New Yorker editor David Remnick to explain his dismal approval, Obama reached into his bag of tricks and played the race card again:

"There’s no doubt that there’s some folks who just really dislike me because they don’t like the idea of a black President," Obama said.

Well, sure, in a country of more than 300 million people, no doubt there are some people who are prejudiced. Just ask any Muslim you know. But the truth is Obama’s color isn’t the reason his popularity has plummeted. On the contrary, it’s the reason he was elected President in the first place, to which Obama alluded in the New Yorker article:

"Now, the flip side of it is there are some black folks and maybe some white folks who really like me and give me the benefit of the doubt precisely because I’m a black President."

Think about it. What if Obama had been white? Do you think there’s any chance that an obscure white politician from Illinois who hadn’t even completed a single, undistinguished term in the Senate would have been elected President? Heck, if Obama had been white, do you really believe he would have defeated Hillary Clinton for the Democratic nomination?

Not a chance.

If Obama had been white, do you believe the media would have ignored his very dubious associations or his lack of any real accomplishments as a U.S. Senator, an Illinois State Senator or a community organizer? Do you he would have been given a pass on such mysteries as the grades he got in college or why he can’t produce an authentic birth certificate?

No, Obama’s skin color has nothing to do with his plunging popularity. On the contrary, Obama was elected President in 2008 precisely because he was black, not in spite of it. He won because there was a vast reservoir of good will in this country toward him from whites who genuinely wanted him to succeed.

Had they known what he actually believed and the kind of far-left policies he would try to implement, there’s not a chance he would have been elected. It was precisely because he was able to hide his Marxist associations and his far-left agenda that he is sitting in the White House today.

Despite the fact that a majority of Americans say he’s taking the country in the wrong direction, Obama says he is more determined than ever to implement his radical agenda. And if he can’t get Congress to pass the legislation he wants, then he’ll do it without their approval.

He said so himself. As he convened his first cabinet meeting of the new year, Obama said: "We’re not just going to be waiting for legislation in order to make sure that we’re providing Americans the kind of help they need. I’ve got a pen and I’ve got a phone."

He then rattled off a long list of issues that he says Federal bureaucrats will begin implementing, regardless of what Congress does.

For a man who once taught Constitutional law, Obama sure doesn’t think much of the system our Founding Fathers created. Forget about checks and balances between three branches of government. Creating the laws under which we must live is supposed to be the responsibility of the legislative branch, the Senate and the House of Representatives. Obama’s job, as the head of the executive branch, is to implement the laws Congress passes.

Of course, Obama knows that is how the system is supposed to work. He just doesn’t like it. He doesn’t want to be bound down by the chains of a Constitution.

And he isn’t. Last year, for every law that Congress approved, the executive branch created hundreds of new rules and regulations. In 2013, the Federal Register, where such new dictates must be published, was more than 80,000 pages long.

Obama is sounding more like the dictator of a banana republic than the President of the American republic. He and his staff have repeatedly changed the rules for Obamacare in an effort to keep the program from totally collapsing. The Environmental Protection Agency is doing the same to destroy the coal industry in this country, as well as to implement the Administration’s agenda on "climate change." (Remember, we’re no longer calling this trumped-up crisis "global warming." In the wake of the winter storms that have been paralyzing much of the country, the environmental extremists needed a phrase that didn’t make them look totally ridiculous.)

Disturbing as his comments may have been, Obama hasn’t gone as far as Andrew Cuomo. During a radio interview last week, the New York Governor actually wondered out loud if conservatives should even be allowed to live in the State.

Here’s what he said: "Who are they? Are they these extreme conservatives who are right-to-life, pro-assault-weapon, anti-gay? Is that who they are? Because if that’s who they are and if they are the extreme conservatives, they have no place in the state of New York, because that’s not who New Yorkers are."

Be sure to note how Cuomo twists things to portray honest conservatives as extremists. If you believe that marriage should be between a man and a woman, that somehow makes you an anti-gay extremist. If you support the right to "keep and bear arms," as the 2nd Amendment promises, then you must be a "pro-assault weapon" extremist.

If other words, if you disagree with the liberal agenda, you are an extremist. And not only does the Governor of New York want to exclude you from the political debate, but he doesn’t even want you to live in his State.

The bad news is that the left is getting even more open and arrogant about their intentions.

The good news is that more and more Americans don’t like it. A majority of our fellow countrymen now agree that the country is heading in the wrong direction.

How do we turn it in the right one? One way is to nominate, and then elect, politicians who will stick to their principles after they are elected. Pay attention to what they say now. And even more important, hold their feet to the fire once they get to Washington.

Nobody said it would be easy defending our liberties. But somebody’s got to do it. So it better be us.

Until next time, keep some powder dry.

–Chip Wood





The GOP Elite Aren’t Really Interested In Winning The Presidency, And They Certainly Aren’t Interested In Shrinking Government: Their main aim is to run a crony protection racket and maintain America’s fascist system of governance for as long as the money holds out; all other goals are secondary
No group knows better how to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory than the Republican establishment; now they are pushing for an amnesty bill backed by Obama, Senate Democrats and corporatist handlers. America currently has the lowest labor participation rate in 35 years; yet the GOP establishment is advocating for a bill to bring millions of new workers into the country. GOP elites and party bosses claim an amnesty bill will make the Republican Party more attractive to Hispanics. Here’s what it will really do and why they really support it: It will provide corporations with a cheap labor pool, drive down wages, and send more young people to the unemployment line and onto the government dole.


The GOP Elite Aren’t Really Interested In Winning The Presidency, And They Certainly Aren’t Interested In Shrinking Government: Their main aim is to run a crony protection racket and maintain America’s fascist system of governance for as long as the money holds out; all other goals are secondary.

The GOP’s Losing Strategy

January 13, 2014 by Bob Livingston — Personal Liberty Digest 

No group knows better how to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory than the Republican establishment. But this election cycle it seems they want to establish their losing strategy early so as to avoid any late-season drama.

Last Presidential cycle, the GOP ensured its defeat by abandoning conservatives. It followed its old script of nominating a milquetoast, faux-conservative warmonger in Mitt Romney, who was campaigning on attacking Iran and Syria and growing government. If that weren’t enough, it engaged in dirty tricks during the primary to defeat Ron Paul, the only conservative in the race.

The GOP’s actions during the primaries discouraged Paul supporters — composed of a mostly younger crowd just cutting their teeth in politics, civil libertarians and doves of a more leftist bent — from participating in an obviously rigged system. And if that weren’t enough to turn off the Paul supporters, the elites humiliated them on the convention floor in Tampa, Fla. Then, when Romney fell short on election night to a Barack Obama who received 3.6 million few votes than he did in 2008, the GOP establishment blamed Paul supporters and the conservative Tea Party for not turning out.

Since then, rather than court them, the GOP has done nothing but antagonize conservatives, libertarians and Tea Party adherents. Establishment Republicans have spit in the faces of rank-and-file conservatives. The establishment has ridiculed and slandered those on the right who have advocated for smaller government, an end to wars, defunding Obamacare, an end to drone attacks, the repeal of National Defense Authorization Act unlawful detention and the Patriot Act, and the cessation of National Security Agency spying. Among the invectives they’ve used: whacko birds, crazy, unpatriotic, ridiculous and bullies who need their noses punched.

Establishment Republicans abandoned Senator Rand Paul during his filibuster over drone attacks in the United States. As evidenced by the popular reaction Paul received both from people who traditionally vote Republican and the Ron Paul crowd who tend to vote libertarian if they vote at all, the elites were on the wrong side of the debate.

The old guard abandoned Senator Ted Cruz during his "filibuster" over Obamacare funding, choosing instead to give only lip service to opposing the law. And given the popular support Cruz received, the elites again opposed what they claim is their base.

During the government shutdown, Weeper of the House John Boehner made a tepid effort to appear conservative and allowed the House to make a few efforts at repealing Obamacare. But he caved and capitulated without getting a single concession from Obama and the Senate Democrats — again to the chagrin of true conservatives who wanted to see government spending reined in.

Karl Rove — author of George W. Bush’s leftist social and neocon war agenda and the losing strategy of the last two elections — has declared war on the Tea Party and is combining with crony capitalists to create a big money political machine to swamp any conservative opposition to conservative-in-name-only incumbents. Not only that, his group is going after conservative incumbents like Representative Steve King, who have stood up to the establishment Republican agenda.

And it’s not just Rove targeting the conservative base and the Tea Party. Republican Representative Steven LaTourette’s Main Street Partnership has two satellite groups — The Main Street Advocacy Fund and the Defending Main Street SuperPAC — planning to spend $8 million to back establishment Republicans who are facing Tea Party challenges in the upcoming election. The Main Street Partnership is funded by corporations and K-Street lobbyists. Its chief operating officer is Sarah Chamberlain Resnick, who also runs a spinoff group called the Main Street Individual Fund that received $50,000 from George Soros in 2002, and again in 2004.

The Defending Main Street SuperPAC received $400,000 from two unions in September and October: the International Union of Operating Engineers and Laborer’s International Union of North America.

I have told you before there is little difference between the two parties in Washington, D.C. They receive their funding from the same sources, and they are beholden to the same puppet masters. They are sociopaths whose sole job is to maintain the perks and privilege of office.

The scowling visage of the surly, tyrannical Representative Peter King is all over the media these days. He’s been appointed attack dog for the establishment. His mission is to paint everyone opposed to the surveillance state and neocon war machine as unpatriotic America-hating cranks set out for the Nation’s destruction. He and the establishment are trying to cover the fact that their military adventurism, cronyism/fascism and money printing are the cause of the economic malaise in this country.

Republican Representative Paul Ryan — another establishment "yes man" and darling — teamed with Democrat Senator Patty Murray in a budget deal that rolled back miniscule "sequester" cuts and added to the budget deficit. When conservatives cried "foul," the House weeper — who owes his speakership to Tea Party efforts in 2010 and 2012 — said Tea Party and conservative groups had lost credibility and were using Congress and the American people for their own goals.

Now Boehner and the House leadership are pushing for an amnesty bill backed by President Barack Obama, Senate Democrats and, more importantly, Boehner’s U.S. Chamber of Commerce and corporatist handlers. The country currently has the lowest labor participation rate in 35 years. There are 1.5 million fewer Americans working today than in 2006, despite a population increase of 16 million people.

Yet the GOP establishment is advocating for a bill to bring millions of new workers into the country. GOP elites and party bosses claim an amnesty bill will make the Republican Party more attractive to Hispanics. Here’s what it will do (and the real reason they support it): It will provide corporations with a cheap labor pool, drive down wages and send more young people to the unemployment line and onto the government dole.

The GOP elite aren’t really interested in winning the Presidency, and they certainly aren’t interested in shrinking government. Their main aim is to run a crony protection racket and maintaining the fascist system of governance for as long as the money holds out. All other goals are secondary.





Just Who Are The Big Liars That Are Killing America?
First, it’s Obama and his socialist/Marxist cabal. Second, it’s the lying politicians of both parties. Third, it’s the lying media, up to their necks in a cover-up to support Obama and his destruction of the middle class and small business. Lastly, it’s the moderate GOP establishment in Washington, D.C. None of them care about us. They’re all good buddies in D.C. in bed together with a common cause: getting re-elected, guaranteeing their own golden parachute and setting their kids up for life at our expense. Lies are killing America. Everyone in D.C. lies to trick us, distract us and confuse us. Pretty soon, no one even knows what the truth is anymore. The biggest lie comes from Obama, moderate Republicans and the media elite, who are all in bed together, trying to convince us that only “moderation, cooperation and compromise” can save the GOP… and America. This is one of the greatest lies ever told.


Just Who Are The Big Liars That Are Killing America?

Moderate Establishment Republicans Are Killing The GOP… And America

January 9, 2014 by Wayne Allyn Root —Personal Liberty Digest

Watch the video here — http://personalliberty.com/2014/01/09/moderate-establishment-republicans-are-killing-the-gop-and-america/ — or read the text of it below:

I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. I’m very clear on what’s killing America. First, it’s Barack Obama and his socialist cabal. Even worse than socialist, most of them are Marxist. Second, it’s the lying politicians of both parties. They lie to cover up their true agenda, and they lie to cover up their incompetence. Third, it’s the lying media, up to their necks in a cover-up to support Obama and his destruction of the middle class and small business. Lastly, it’s the moderate GOP establishment in Washington, D.C. They are fraternizing with the enemy. They don’t care about us. They’re all good buddies in D.C. (BFFs, "best friends forever"), in bed together with a common cause: getting re-elected, guaranteeing their own golden parachute and setting their kids up for life, all at the expense of the rest of us.

Lies are killing America. Everyone in D.C. lies to trick us, distract us and confuse us. Pretty soon, no one even knows what the truth is anymore. The biggest lie comes from Obama, moderate Republicans and the media elite, who are all in bed together, trying to convince us that only "moderation, cooperation and compromise" can save the GOP… and America. This is one of the greatest lies ever told.

First of all, moderation won’t save the GOP. Nothing could be further from the truth. The fact is the GOP has had a long list of moderate "saviors":

• Gerald Ford: loser

• Bob Dole: loser

• George H.W. Bush: loser (to Bill Clinton)

• John McCain: loser

• Mitt Romney: loser

So much for "moderation" winning elections for the GOP. The reality is the Republican Party has elected only one true conservative as President. Ever. His name was Ronald Reagan. I was there when my liberal friends at Columbia University called Reagan "loony," "nutty," "extreme," "radical, right-wing nutcase" and "out of touch with average Americans." Well, that "radical, right-wing nutcase" won in two massive Presidential landslides. And how about the results? This one true conservative President brought America back from the brink of total economic collapse, decline, malaise and misery. Reagan turned the worst economy since 1929 into the greatest economic expansion in world history. Reagan created 20 million jobs in just a few years. Then the 20 uninterrupted years of economic expansion that Reagan started created 40 million jobs and trillions in wealth. The mainstream media is desperate to make us forget all that.

You know what else the media doesn’t want us to remember? That Reagan wanted massive cuts to spending, but in the end he listened to the media and "compromised." He agreed to increase spending to get his tax cuts that saved the U.S. economy. Now, Democrats and the media use that "compromise" to destroy Reagan’s legacy by claiming "Reagan raised spending and built huge deficits." Well then, I guess "compromise" is bad for Republicans, isn’t it?

You know what else the media don’t want us to remember? Reagan cut income taxes from 70 percent to 28 percent, but then once again he listened to the media and "compromised." He allowed a few small tax increases in order to get Democrats to agree to future spending cuts. Now, the media accuses Reagan of "raising taxes multiple times." And, of course, the Democrats lied and never cut any of the spending they agreed to. So I guess "compromise" is bad for Republicans, isn’t it?

You know what else the media don’t want us to remember? That George H.W. Bush compromised on his promise: "Read my lips, no new taxes." Once again, in order to get Democrats to rein in spending, Bush compromised. Once again, Democrats lied and cheated. No spending was cut, but Bush got the blame for raising taxes. So I guess "compromise" is bad for Republicans, isn’t it?

And when George W. Bush "compromised" by letting spending grow unchecked and never vetoing a single spending bill, we got an economic crisis, the banking system almost collapsed, the debt plunged us into a depression and Obama was elected. Gee, "compromise" really works out well for Republicans, doesn’t it?

But wait, there’s more proof that this idea of "moderation" is a stone-cold failure. The GOP ran nothing but "moderates" for Congress throughout the 50s, 60s, 70s and even the 80s. The result was a permanent Democratic majority in Congress from 1954 through 1994. Moderation resulted in 40 years of unchallenged domination for Democrats.

The facts are in: When Republicans compromise their principles, allow bigger spending, agree to tax increases, support bigger government, and become nothing more than "Democrat-lite," they lose.

Then, of course, there’s the most powerful proof of all: the 2010 election. Led by the energy and passion of the Tea Party, Republicans achieved the most smashing victory in political history. They not only won Congress in the biggest landslide since 1938 — and took a majority of Governorships — but also won the most State Legislature seats since 1928. The media seems to have overlooked or forgotten about this, even though it happened only three short years ago.

After that record-setting Tea Party victory — with polls showing the Tea Party more popular (by far) than the actual Republican Party itself — politicians of both parties in D.C. panicked. They couldn’t allow the country to be dominated by this idea of smaller government. Everyone in D.C. gets rich off big government. They couldn’t afford to let the gravy train slow down.

So Obama and his socialist cabal, with an assist from big-government RINO Republicans, set about to destroy the Tea Party. The plan was to slander them, distract them, intimidate them and destroy them. It took a coordinated criminal conspiracy (some might call it "racketeering" or organized crime) by Obama, Democrats, big-government politicians of both parties, the mainstream media and, most importantly, the Internal Revenue Service.

Democrats called conservative patriots "terrorists," "arsonists," "radical," "extreme" and worse. The media quoted them all day and night, 24/7. And the IRS set out to intimidate, harass and persecute Tea Party groups and conservative critics of the President, until their energy was killed, their passion erased, their views silenced and their fundraising starved.

Suddenly, with true conservatives distracted, persecuted and on the defensive — and with a wonderful "moderate" like Mitt Romney at the top of the ticket — it was back to mediocrity and the loser’s club for the GOP.

This is what Democrats and the media (I know, I repeat myself) want to convince us to go back to. Could it be that the media desperately want to convince us that a "moderate" will save the GOP, simply because they know a "moderate" will guarantee a Democratic Party victory?

But moderation, cooperation and "compromise" don’t just lead to GOP mediocrity and defeat. They also lead to ruination for the United States of America. The proof is in the pudding. We’ve had decades of cooperation and compromise on Capitol Hill. The result? Seventeen trillion dollars in debt. And when you add in unfunded liabilities, well over $115 trillion in debt. All that cooperation and "business as usual" has produced a bankrupt Nation; the death of full-time, good-paying jobs; and the extinction of the middle class. Moderation, cooperation and compromise have killed the greatest Nation and economic juggernaut in world history.

If all that hasn’t convinced you, how about some eye-opening facts provided by the Congressional Effect Fund. In the past half-century (since 1964), when Congress was in session, the U.S. stock market has been up 1 percent. During that same period, when Congress was on vacation, the stock market was up 17 percent.

So tell me what the benefit is of moderation and cooperation? The reality is no matter who is sitting in those seats on Capitol Hill, politicians are doing damage to our economy each time they compromise and agree to pass a bill.

Still not convinced? How about over a 100-year timeline (again courtesy of the Congressional Effect Fund). If you had invested $1 in the stock market starting in 1899, only when the Congress was in session, today you’d have $2. If you had invested the same $1 only when Congress was on vacation, today you’d have $300.

More proof that moderation, cooperation and compromise are greatly overrated. We don’t need a moderate GOP to save the Republican Party or America. History actually proves that compromise leads to deficit, debt and economic decline.

The solution? We need to throw all the bums out. Every single one of them. Clean house. Then start over with Tea Party conservatives, with the same limited government principles as our Founding Fathers. They should be "citizen politicians" willing to make government smaller, make themselves less powerful and restore power to the people. They should all agree that government feels our pain only because government causes it. Government can’t run the post office without losing $16 billion per year — and that’s with no competition (by law). Government runs Amtrak; it’s lost $40 billion and counting — and still we lose more than $30 every time a butt sits down on an Amtrak train. Government runs the $16 trillion war on poverty that wasted and lost $16 trillion. Government runs our failing public schools. From now on, if a politician thinks "government knows best" or "government has the answer," he must be defeated, no matter what party he represents.

Oh, and one other thing: From this day forward, we must term-limit the politicians. Limit them all to two terms: one term in office and one term in prison. I call it "the Chicago Rule."

I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. Same time, same place. God bless America.





Obama: The Bullying, Lying, Spying Tyrant In The White House Who Has America Living In Decline, Crisis and Fear
You’ve got to hear the truth if you want to save America, save your job or business, save your civil rights and freedoms, and save your children’s or grandchildren’s future. The shocking and disturbing truth is we have a tyrant in the White House. His level of bullying, lying, spying, distorting, manipulating, intimidating, demonizing and using propaganda to cram his policies down our throats is unlike any President in history. His name is Barack Obama. But it might as well be some Marxist thug like Fidel Castro or Hugo Chavez. The result is something none of us ever imagined: America living in decline, crisis and fear. An even better analogy is to compare Obama to Chicago’s own Al Capone. We have an organized crime gangster living in the White House who believes the ends justify the means. He’s playing the meanest, dirtiest game that has ever been played in D.C.


Obama: The Bullying, Lying, Spying Tyrant In The White House Who Has America Living In Decline, Crisis and Fear

The web page is too large to displayOK

OK

An error has occurred.