Home Page of Hypoism, The Disease of Addictions

Web site advertising

The Overriding Principle

The reason for this web site


send me a message

Discussion Page

Buy the book

Buy the Book

Hypoism Issues

Role of Dopamine in Addiction Causation

Theory of Addiction - Hypoism Hypothesis

Why drug use is unconscious and against one's willfulness - not volitional

Misuse of the word choice in addictions



What Am I Angry About? - Don't Ask Me This Again

Disease Concept - A Perspective


Page Directory of this Site with Explanations and Links

The History of the Proof of Hypoism in the Wake of the P/R Paradigm page 1.

History page 2

Why Addiction Experts and Other People Are Ignoring Hypoism

Strange Brew


The Paradigm Vacuum in Addictions Today


What Does An Addiction Expert Know?

The Hypoism Addiction Hypothesis - An Evolutionary Psychology Perspective

Addiction Questionnaire

Misconceptions of addictions and addicts

What's Hypoism? What's an Addiction?


Why We Need Hypoism: A Comparison of the Principles and Consequences between the two Paradigms

Entitled to Your Opinion? Not Anymore.

HYPOICMAN: A non-recovering, unimpressed Hypoic

The Field of Addictionology: A Golfing Analogy


Contact Information

Hypoism Treatment Research

The Addiction Treatment Fraud Finally Exposed

Hypoism Treatment Research Proposal



The National Association for the Advancement and Advocacy of Addicts

Make A Contribution To The N4A

Addict Discrimination Documentation

Social Innovations Award 2000 for The N4A

Third Millennium N4A Conference Keynote Address on Hypoism - Pathophysiology in Addictions vs. Superstition

N4A Goes on the Offensive - Suggesting Real Action

The Verdict

Blind Faith?

Learn More About the Book

Letters from book readers

Title Page of Book

Book Blurb

Book Cover

Back Cover

Table of Contents



Opening Statement

Chapter 1

Vision For The Future

Outcomes of Hypoic's Handbook


Book Corrections

Harm reduction prototype: Swiss PROVE program

Book Reviews

The Phoenix Magazine

Hypoics Not-Anonymous

Hypoics Not-Anonymous

Things You Can Do

What you can do---

My Kids

Special Links

Special Links to important web sites

Addiction Links on the Web

Addiction Genetics

Recent Genetic Studies on Various Addictions from a Large Twin Registry

Genetic Studies page 2.

Gateway theory finally disproven

Celera Discovers Millions of Tiny Genetic Differences in People

Interesting Addiction Science

Clinically Important Neurotransmitter Deficiencies

Hypoism Magazine-Articles by and for Hypoics


#1 Hatred, #2 The Words: Opinion, Belief, and Knowledge, #3 Hate Addiction

#4 The Drug War War, #5 Evolution vs. Creationism Revisited for Addictions

#6 American Society for Addiction Medicine Statement for Recovering Physicians

#7 Issues Peculiar to the Disease of Addictions

#8 Critique of Alan Lechner's (NIH), "The Hijacked Brain Hypothesis."

#8a. Update!! Dr. Leshner recently makes a change

#9 MY STORY - The Doctor Drug War - Wrong and Wasteful p.1, 1/6/00

The Doctor Drug War p.2

Doctor Drug War p.3

Doctor Drug War p.4

Doctor Drug War p.5

Affidavit for judicial review of NYS Dept. of Ed.

#10 The Superstition Instinct 3/1/00

#11-Conflict of Interest in Addiction Research

#12 - Controlled Drinking Lands On Its Ass

#13 - The Kennedy Curse or Kennedy Hypoism?

#14 - The Lord's Prayer for Hypoics

#15 - Replacing Alan Leshner is the only way to end the Drug War

#16 - The Brain Addiction Mechanism and the COGA Study

#17 - Letter to the director of the National Academy of Medicine's Board on Neurobiology and Behavior Health on Addictions

#18 - Is Addiction Voluntary, A Choice, as Leshner and NIDA Insist?

#19 - Bush's Alcoholism and Lies

#20 - A P/R Paradigm Addict - "Cured?"

#21 - Congress Misled and Lied to by NIAAA

#22 - Special Letter to the Times on Addiction Genetics

#23 - JAMA Editor Publishes According to His Beliefs, Not Science

#24 - Smoking as Gateway Drug. I Don't Think So!


#25 - One Less Heroin Addict. But At What Cost?

#26 - An Open Letter to the Judge who Sentences Robert Downey, Jr.

#27 - Letter To Schools About The Pride Program Against Drugs

#28 - A Letter To Bill Moyers, Close To Home, and PBS


#30 - Brookhaven Labs Provide More Evidence For Hypoism

#31 - Addiction Prevention Revisited


#33 - NIDA Is Close But No Cigar

#34 - Bush's Addict Discrimination and Hypocricy Begins

#35 - Maya Angelou's, "Still I Rise."

#36 - Leshner Lies To Congress

#37 - Addiction Combos

#38 Brain tumor proves Hypoism hypothesis

#39: So-called Availability Debunked as Contributor of Addictions

#40 - Hypoism Reproduced By A Pill



The Hypoism Blog - The Addiction Blog

The Addiction Blog 4/17/11 -

The Addiction Blog 9/14/10 - 4/16/11

The Addiction Blog 11/12/09 - 9/14/10

The Addiction Blog 7/23/09 - 11/09/09

The Addiction Blog 5/16/09 - 7/22/09

The Addiction Blog 3/3/09 - 5/13/09

The Addiction Blog 8/3/08 - 3/3/09

The Addiction Blog 4/1/07 - 8/3/08

old letters

My NY Times Letters to the Editor page 1.

My NY Times Letters to the Editor page 2.

My NY Times Letters to the Editor page 3.

My NY Times Letters to the Editor page 4.

My NY Times Letters to the Editor page 5.

My New York Times Letters to the Editor page 6.

My Letters to the editor of the NY Times page 7.

My Letters to the Editor of the NY Times page 8.

NY Times Letters Page 9.

New York Times Letters Page 10

My NYT Letters page 11

NY Times Letters page 12.

NY Times letters p. 13

Letters to the NY Times page 14.

Letters to Newsday

Letters To The Los Angeles Times

Creationism/Evolution Letter to BAM 11-25-05


Committee for Physician Health Speech

The Future of Addictions

Addict Discrimination in the News

Mandated Treatment for Welfare Recipients

Anorectic Murdered by Doctors out of Ignorance and "Desperation"(10/20/99)

Six Dead Heroin Addicts-Enough? 10/31/99

American Society of Addiction Medicine Discrimination

Darryl Strawberry Punished Again

South Carolina Forces Pregnant Women to Take Drug Tests

When it comes to drugs, the constitution doesn't apply

Parents of Overweight Girl Will Sue New Mexico



Download Files

huffington post

Custom HTML


Hypoics are born, not made.

Dan F. Umanoff, M.D.  
8779 Misty Creek Dr.  
Sarasota, Florida 34241  


Six Dead Heroin Addicts - Is That Enough? 


Detoxification is an integral part of heroin addiction treatment and necessary for the overall recovery process to begin.

State Knew of Risky Heroin Treatment Before Patient Deaths By PAUL ZIELBAUER, NY Times, (10/31/99)

[COMMENT-INTRO.: The doctor discussed below says we need more options, not less. Obviously, six dead is not enough. Besides the fact that rapid detox is stupid, expensive, useless, unphysiological, inappropriate, meaningless, and harmful, I bet it will be continued. These people see detox as something to get over rather than the beginning of a life-long recovery process which necessitates gentle, loving care. It takes several months to years for an opiate addict to fully recover physiologically from the addiction and an entire lifetime to recover from the disease that got him addicted, Hypoism. In general, doctors don't know about this unless they've gone through detox themselves. I experienced several ineffective and abusive detoxes from opiates and they all led to relapses when rushed and not seen as part of the loving process of recovery. I was blamed for each of those relapses by the NYS Health Dept. in my medical license revocation hearing and they were used as evidense against me for not being sincere about my efforts to get clean. Many detoxes (usually run by addict-haters) use detox as a way to "break denial" of the addict, in other words, to make sure he sees what a bad boy he is. Abuse in detox and rehab of addicts is the rule rather than the exception. All this is part of the damaging P/R paradigm of addictions because the addict is seen as at fault and deserves whatever happens to him. "We will show him who's boss," is the prevailing attitude. "If he didn't get addicted, he wouldn't be in this mess to begin with," they say. "We tried to help, but he went out and killed himself. What can we do?" All these attitudes will change under Hypoism.]

TRENTON -- When New Jersey investigators filed a lawsuit against Dr. Lance L. Gooberman earlier this month that linked his unusual heroin detoxification treatment to six patient deaths, officials in the State Attorney General's office proclaimed they had stopped an "unlawful" treatment that put addicts' lives in danger.
But the state board responsible for regulating medical procedures knew of Dr. Gooberman's treatment well before the first patient death in 1995, records show, and though it determined the heroin treatment to be "potentially life threatening" [of course, why stop it then? This is typical addict-hater policy. "Let's see how many more he can kill."] in 1997, several months before three more patients died, it did not intervene until earlier this month.
Even though Dr. Gooberman disclosed to the state in July 1998 that one of his patients died shortly after a treatment, investigators did not begin an inquiry until a year later, when he told them another patient had died.
There were other public warnings about Dr. Gooberman's treatment. In July 1997, he acknowledged after a speech to doctors at the University of Pennsylvania that three or four of his patients had died, said doctors who attended. More recently, on Aug. 2, the American Medical News published an article in which Dr. Gooberman revealed that within 48 hours of his treatment, five of his patients died, three apparently due to subsequent drug use. State officials defend the timing of their investigation by pointing out that patients die every day, and regulators need firm legal reasons to bar questionable or unsavory treatments. In this case, one death was not enough to force the state to block Dr. Gooberman's unorthodox treatments, said Mark S. Herr, the director of the State Division of Consumer Affairs, which oversees the state medical board.
"The knowledge of the deaths transformed this from something that needed to be examined to something that needed a more urgent response," Herr said in a recent interview. During the state's investigation of Dr. Gooberman, who insists he has been singled out unfairly, a sixth patient of the doctor's died. Now, investigators are discreetly looking into the possibility of more deaths related to Dr. Gooberman's treatment, a four- to six-hour outpatient heroin treatment called ultra-rapid opiate detoxification.
Dr. Gooberman's current troubles offer a glimpse into the controversy surrounding the growing business of rapid detoxification, an unorthodox treatment for addiction that, in the last five years, has spawned a rush among a handful of doctors to patent -- and profit from -- their own versions of a procedure that many doctors believe is unproven and needlessly risky.
"We have concerns about its safety," said Dr. Alan Trachtenberg of the Federal Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, in Bethesda, Md. "What is actually being accomplished by pushing someone through detox rapidly?"
What makes ultra-rapid opiate detoxification a subject of debate is its speed -- it can be done in as few as four hours, with no required after care -- and its use of anesthesia to knock patients out while doctors feed them a series of intravenous drugs that remove the opiates in the brain that cause physical addictions. [This oversimplification of the detox process is ridiculous. The process of opiate addiction takes weeks to years and involves neurobiological changes that likewise take weeks to years to readjust to. The rapid detox gets the addict over the acute withdrawl, but he is still in long-term withdrawl that the brain neurotransmitters and opiate receptors must adapt to through a biological rebuilding and repair process that goes on over the next several months to years. While this is happening the addict is quite uncomfortable and at high risk of relapse and overdose. Thus, the frequent overdoses when these addicts walk out of the detox clinic. When they relapse, they have no idea how much of the drug will get them high versus kill them. No after care? That's why they died!]
But there is a significant downside to the treatment, which costs up to $8,000. Patients awaken cleansed of opiates, but they are not cured of addiction and still face a punishing psychological need for heroin. The drastic chemical changes the patient undergoes can also cause heart and respiratory problems, addiction specialists say. And once the patients leave the clinic or hospital, relapse is a constant threat.
To help prevent addicts from relapsing after the treatment, Dr. Gooberman surgically inserts a pellet of a heroin-blocking drug, naltrexone, into their abdomens.
The pellet, which the doctor has patented along with his detoxification procedure, is meant to dissolve over 60 days to block further cravings for narcotics. [It doesn't block the cravings, it blocks the opiate receptors so that using heroin at this point will not have as much effect as it would without the naltrexone. Obviously, this is not foolproof.]
As a result of the state's lawsuit, Dr. Gooberman and his partner, Dr. David Bradway, signed a legal agreement two weeks ago not to perform any more detoxifications without the state's permission. They are still allowed to insert new naltrexone pellets in their patients, who include state prisoners.
In July, even as the State Attorney General was investigating Dr. Gooberman, the state's Administrative Office of the Courts contracted with him to treat heroin-addicted convicts enrolled in a work-release program, according to documents provided by Dr. Gooberman's lawyer, Alma L. Saravia.
Experts estimate that about 10,000 heroin users worldwide have undergone anesthetized detoxification since ultra-rapid opiate detoxification was invented in the late 1980's by an Austrian physician. The treatment has been associated with at least 10 deaths, including six of Dr. Gooberman's patients.
Even the doctors who advocate the treatment acknowledge a dearth of research proving that it works. Many doctors say ultra-rapid detoxification will never take the place of a complete withdrawal program like methadone.
Dr. Jim Callahan, the executive vice president of the American Society of Addiction Medicine, equated anesthetized detox to a quick fix. "It runs counter to what we have seen work with people who have chronic histories of opiate addiction," he said.
A federally funded [Sure, let's have the feds get into the act of killing more heroin addicts too. Why should New Jersey have all the fun?] study of ultra-rapid opiate detoxification may soon shed more light on the treatment. The study, started on Sept. 5 by Dr. Herbert Kleber, the medical director of the National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University, will track the treatment's effectiveness on 60 heroin addicts over three months.
Dr. Kleber, 65, is an outspoken opponent of commercial one-day detoxification treatments like Dr. Gooberman's.
He will soon give his views directly to New Jersey's medical board, known as the Board of Medical Examiners, which has hired him as an expert witness in Dr. Gooberman's case, Ms. Saravia said.
The board passed up several opportunities to halt Dr. Gooberman's procedure. In an interview on Oct. 19, Herr said the board first heard of Dr. Gooberman and his treatment "sometime in the last two years." Three days later, Herr amended that, saying the board first learned of Dr. Gooberman in December 1996 or January 1997.
But in a letter to Dr. Gooberman dated April 19, 1995, and supplied to The New York Times by Ms. Saravia, the board said that it was aware of his detoxification procedure and requested more information about it.
In November 1997, the board published a set of proposals to strictly regulate anesthesia detoxification, but a year later chose to enact a lesser measure governing the use of anesthesia in all outpatient treatments.
By then, five of Dr. Gooberman's patients had died.
Dr. Gooberman, a short, stout man with a red beard and pale blue eyes, says he has been unfairly pursued by state officials. "The whole time I was doing it," he said last week in an interview, "I knew I was doing what's right for the patient."
Proponents say the treatment holds out new promise for the nation's estimated 810,000 heroin users, especially those for whom methadone has failed. [Addicts need gradual inpatient methadone detox, walk out drug free into rehab where they can begin a slow and gradual recovery with proper Hypoism 12 Step support, guidance, and care, not the hit or miss superstitious recovery we have today. After leaving rehab, recovery should be based on Hypoism, however, which will, in my opinion, reduce future relapses and not require long-term methadone maintenance which is not a treatment but a long-term addiction to a drug 100 times harder to get off than heroin. Methadone maintenance, although better than street heroin addiction under the present laws and expense, should in no way be seen as treatment or recovery of any kind, except as being in jail while walking the streets. We need to advocate recovery, not continued addiction. The atmosphere of opiate addiction treatment today is draconian and a big lie that controls addicts rather than freeing them. Hypoism will free these addicts sucked into the methadone trap by methadone experts (pushers) who claim, "There are addicts who can't recover. They need methadone." Under the P/R paradigm and the war on drugs, that may be true, but not under the Hypoism paradigm. Methadone pushers don't have a clue about what real recovery is or what it has to offer addicts. That's one of the pitfalls of the P/R paradigm. It has no idea what recovery really is.]
Many American physicians believe the treatment has spawned a gold-rush mentality among a coterie of doctor-entrepreneurs. Instead of sharing their breakthroughs with their peers, their critics say, the doctors have used patents and trademarks to make money on them. They point to a growing list of physician-owned businesses with names like U.S. Detox, which Dr. Gooberman controls, and Intensive Narcotic Detoxification Centers of America, of Tolland, Conn., a company founded by Dr. David L. Simon, an anesthesiologist who recently trademarked the phrases "intensive narcotic detoxification" and the more catchy "kick in your sleep."
Of course, the business of heroin detoxification would be nothing without a steady supply of customers. Driving the demand for the anesthetized detox treatment is an emerging kind of heroin addict: middle-class suburban youth.
"What I'm seeing now is kids and parents that are desperate [The old, "Desperate patients need desperate measures," excuse.] ," said Dr. Gooberman, 48, of Haddonfield, N.J., near Philadelphia. Since 1994, he has detoxified 2,150 patients, he said, many of whom are teen-agers who arrive at his clinic with a parent in tow.
With Dr. Gooberman's treatment on hold pending a ruling from the state's Board of Medical Examiners, the rapid detoxification market in the metropolitan region is left to two others: Dr. Simon in Connecticut and Bennett L. Oppenheim, a clinical psychologist who runs UltraMed International of Fort Lee, N.J.
Oppenheim began his business last year, after a clinic he ran at Metropolitan Hospital Center in Harlem with the help of two Israeli partners was closed by New York City's Health and Hospitals Corporation when its contract expired in August 1998.
The Israelis, David Yerushalmi and his brother-in-law, Dr. Andre Waismann, are notable because they were the first to trademark the phrase "ultra-rapid opiate detoxification" and, through their now defunct company, CITA Americas, performed the $7,000 procedure on addicts in prestigious hospitals in Chicago, Los Angeles and Miami, Oppenheim said. Each man has since struck out on his own. Oppenheim is now paired with a different physician, a different name for his treatment and a new venue, at Pascack Valley Hospital in Westwood, N.J.
All this medical entrepreneurship worries some doctors.
"The chance to make a profit has stimulated its growth more than its effectiveness," said Dr. Joseph R. Volpicelli, a psychiatrist in the University of Pennsylvania's medical school who has studied anesthetized detox treatments.
"It may be the wave of the future and that's how medical companies will make their profits," he said, reflecting on the wave of patents in recent years. "But that would be a shame." The American Medical Association strongly advises its members not to patent medical procedures, saying patents represent "substantial risks to the effective practice of medicine." Furthermore, Federal law forbids doctors to enforce patents on medical procedures, said Dr. Nancy Dickey, a former A.M.A. president.
But doctors like Dr. Simon in Connecticut, who recently sued another heroin detox concern for using his treatment method, dismiss such criticism as babbittry from doctors wedded to methadone treatments.
"The psychiatrists don't want to replace five days of inpatient detox [A good opiate detox should take 10-14 days, otherwise they walk out still in withdrawl.], which they manage, with one day of outpatient detox" performed by anesthesiologists like him, Dr. Simon said. Dr. Gooberman's formal response to the New Jersey medical board is due Nov. 10, Ms. Saravia said. After that, the board has 30 days to decide whether to revoke his medical license or refer the matter to a state judge, she said.
Dr. Gooberman hopes to be back in the rapid-detox business soon. "We have to offer drug addicts more options," he said, "not less."


Dear letters,

The article, State Knew of Risky Heroin Treatment Before Patient Deaths, shows one more time the rationalized and deadly justification of our right to kill addicts. This time by a "doctor" who says he wants to help them. We are very sick, sick, sick to believe any of this. Rapid detox is not only unnecessary and dangerous (obviously) but does absolutely nothing for the addict except set him up for a big disaster -complications and relapse when and if he walks out of the clinic alive. Detox from drugs is only the very initial step in an addict's recovery and must be part of a life-long recovery process. It is not a quick fix for anything. And, it needs to be accomplished slowly and gently so the addict's addicted brain has time to readjust. Addiction is not caused by drugs but by an underlying neurobiological disease that clearly isn't presently understood. Detox and recovery must be seen a part of life-long continuous process of recovery from that disease, not as isolated and individual elements, and not at all just about getting the drugs out of the addict's system. Because of our fear and hate for addicts we allow this barbaric and negligent practice to continue, not unlike the leukotomy performed in England recently on an anorectic resulting in her death. This rapid detox "treatment" needs to be seen for what it is, torture, medically sanctioned human damage, and ignorant negligence. It is murder, not just malpractice. The final sentence, "Dr. Gooberman hopes to be back in the rapid-detox business soon. 'We have to offer drug addicts more options,' he said, 'not less,'" shows just how deep his disdain is for addicts. I'm appalled and furious that this technique could have ever been allowed to begin with.




You can take the addiction out of the hypoic, but you can't take the Hypoism out of the addict.

Sign In