Hypoism



Home Page of Hypoism, The Disease of Addictions


Web site advertising


The Overriding Principle


The reason for this web site


IMAGINE


send me a message


Discussion Page

Buy the book



Buy the Book

Hypoism Issues



Role of Dopamine in Addiction Causation


Theory of Addiction - Hypoism Hypothesis


Why drug use is unconscious and against one's willfulness - not volitional


Misuse of the word choice in addictions


THE INESCAPABLE LOGIC OF ANY VALID ADDICTION ETIOLOGICAL PARADIGM


WHAT OTHER DISEASE....?


What Am I Angry About? - Don't Ask Me This Again


Disease Concept - A Perspective


HYPOISM IN A NUT SHELL


Page Directory of this Site with Explanations and Links


The History of the Proof of Hypoism in the Wake of the P/R Paradigm page 1.


History page 2


Why Addiction Experts and Other People Are Ignoring Hypoism


Strange Brew


AIMING AT AN UNDERSTANDING OF ADDICTIONS


The Paradigm Vacuum in Addictions Today


THE ADDICTION PROBLEM AND THE SOLUTION


What Does An Addiction Expert Know?


The Hypoism Addiction Hypothesis - An Evolutionary Psychology Perspective


Addiction Questionnaire


Misconceptions of addictions and addicts


What's Hypoism? What's an Addiction?


WHY WE DON'T NEED HYPOISM.


Why We Need Hypoism: A Comparison of the Principles and Consequences between the two Paradigms


Entitled to Your Opinion? Not Anymore.


HYPOICMAN: A non-recovering, unimpressed Hypoic


The Field of Addictionology: A Golfing Analogy


NEW YEAR PREDICTIONS


Contact Information

Hypoism Treatment Research



The Addiction Treatment Fraud Finally Exposed


Hypoism Treatment Research Proposal

N4A



I KEPT QUIET


The National Association for the Advancement and Advocacy of Addicts


Make A Contribution To The N4A


Addict Discrimination Documentation


Social Innovations Award 2000 for The N4A


Third Millennium N4A Conference Keynote Address on Hypoism - Pathophysiology in Addictions vs. Superstition


N4A Goes on the Offensive - Suggesting Real Action


The Verdict


Blind Faith?

Learn More About the Book



Letters from book readers


Title Page of Book


Book Blurb


Book Cover


Back Cover


Table of Contents


Foreword


Preface


Opening Statement


Chapter 1


Vision For The Future


Outcomes of Hypoic's Handbook


Bibliography


Book Corrections


Harm reduction prototype: Swiss PROVE program

Book Reviews



The Phoenix Magazine

Hypoics Not-Anonymous



Hypoics Not-Anonymous

Things You Can Do



What you can do---


My Kids

Special Links



Special Links to important web sites


Addiction Links on the Web

Addiction Genetics



Recent Genetic Studies on Various Addictions from a Large Twin Registry


Genetic Studies page 2.


Gateway theory finally disproven


Celera Discovers Millions of Tiny Genetic Differences in People

Interesting Addiction Science



Clinically Important Neurotransmitter Deficiencies

Hypoism Magazine-Articles by and for Hypoics



EMBRYONIC HYPOISM CIRCA 1968


#1 Hatred, #2 The Words: Opinion, Belief, and Knowledge, #3 Hate Addiction


#4 The Drug War War, #5 Evolution vs. Creationism Revisited for Addictions


#6 American Society for Addiction Medicine Statement for Recovering Physicians


#7 Issues Peculiar to the Disease of Addictions


#8 Critique of Alan Lechner's (NIH), "The Hijacked Brain Hypothesis."


#8a. Update!! Dr. Leshner recently makes a change


#9 MY STORY - The Doctor Drug War - Wrong and Wasteful p.1, 1/6/00


The Doctor Drug War p.2


Doctor Drug War p.3


Doctor Drug War p.4


Doctor Drug War p.5


Affidavit for judicial review of NYS Dept. of Ed.


#10 The Superstition Instinct 3/1/00


#11-Conflict of Interest in Addiction Research


#12 - Controlled Drinking Lands On Its Ass


#13 - The Kennedy Curse or Kennedy Hypoism?


#14 - The Lord's Prayer for Hypoics


#15 - Replacing Alan Leshner is the only way to end the Drug War


#16 - The Brain Addiction Mechanism and the COGA Study


#17 - Letter to the director of the National Academy of Medicine's Board on Neurobiology and Behavior Health on Addictions


#18 - Is Addiction Voluntary, A Choice, as Leshner and NIDA Insist?


#19 - Bush's Alcoholism and Lies


#20 - A P/R Paradigm Addict - "Cured?"


#21 - Congress Misled and Lied to by NIAAA


#22 - Special Letter to the Times on Addiction Genetics


#23 - JAMA Editor Publishes According to His Beliefs, Not Science


#24 - Smoking as Gateway Drug. I Don't Think So!


#24B - IS COCAINE ADDICTION CAUSED BY COCAINE?


#25 - One Less Heroin Addict. But At What Cost?


#26 - An Open Letter to the Judge who Sentences Robert Downey, Jr.


#27 - Letter To Schools About The Pride Program Against Drugs


#28 - A Letter To Bill Moyers, Close To Home, and PBS


#29 - HYPOISM IS ACTUALLY A DISEASE OF THE "WILL"


#30 - Brookhaven Labs Provide More Evidence For Hypoism


#31 - Addiction Prevention Revisited


#32 - DRUG WAR EVALUATION BY THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCE


#33 - NIDA Is Close But No Cigar


#34 - Bush's Addict Discrimination and Hypocricy Begins


#35 - Maya Angelou's, "Still I Rise."


#36 - Leshner Lies To Congress


#37 - Addiction Combos


#38 Brain tumor proves Hypoism hypothesis


#39: So-called Availability Debunked as Contributor of Addictions


#40 - Hypoism Reproduced By A Pill


PIMMPAL Complex


Cartoons

The Hypoism Blog - The Addiction Blog



The Addiction Blog 4/17/11 -


The Addiction Blog 9/14/10 - 4/16/11


The Addiction Blog 11/12/09 - 9/14/10


The Addiction Blog 7/23/09 - 11/09/09


The Addiction Blog 5/16/09 - 7/22/09


The Addiction Blog 3/3/09 - 5/13/09


The Addiction Blog 8/3/08 - 3/3/09


The Addiction Blog 4/1/07 - 8/3/08

old letters



My NY Times Letters to the Editor page 1.


My NY Times Letters to the Editor page 2.


My NY Times Letters to the Editor page 3.


My NY Times Letters to the Editor page 4.


My NY Times Letters to the Editor page 5.


My New York Times Letters to the Editor page 6.


My Letters to the editor of the NY Times page 7.


My Letters to the Editor of the NY Times page 8.


NY Times Letters Page 9.


New York Times Letters Page 10


My NYT Letters page 11


NY Times Letters page 12.


NY Times letters p. 13


Letters to the NY Times page 14.


Letters to Newsday


Letters To The Los Angeles Times


Creationism/Evolution Letter to BAM 11-25-05

Speeches



Committee for Physician Health Speech
goldbutton.jpg

The Future of Addictions

Addict Discrimination in the News



Mandated Treatment for Welfare Recipients


Anorectic Murdered by Doctors out of Ignorance and "Desperation"(10/20/99)


Six Dead Heroin Addicts-Enough? 10/31/99


American Society of Addiction Medicine Discrimination


Darryl Strawberry Punished Again


South Carolina Forces Pregnant Women to Take Drug Tests


When it comes to drugs, the constitution doesn't apply


Parents of Overweight Girl Will Sue New Mexico


Scrapbook

Downloads



Download Files


huffington post


Custom HTML


Sitemap




Hypoics are born, not made.

Hypoism  
Dan F. Umanoff, M.D.  
941-926-5209  
8779 Misty Creek Dr.  
Sarasota, Florida 34241  

dan.umanoff.md@gmail.com  




Letter To Schools About PRIDE Anti-Drug Program

January 13, 2001

William H. Johnson, Ed.D.
Superintendent of Schools
Administration Building
128 Shephard Street
Rockville Centre, NY 11570

Dear Dr. Johnson:

I just received your letter to parents about the PRIDE meeting on the 25th. I am an alumnus of Rockville Centre schools as well as a parent of a student who currently attends Rockville Centre schools. As a physician, recovering addict, and addiction theorist/activist, I am deeply concerned about the paradoxical negative impact the PRIDE program has on students, society, and addicts alike.

To be sure, this negative impact is not caused by any lack of desire or will on your part to help, but, instead, by the paradoxical effects the incorrect understanding of the origin of drug use and addictions among students and all people has on the outcomes of this kind of program. The lack of correct understanding of the cause of addictions results in perpetuation and exacerbation of the problems rather than solutions to them.

Bottom line: The PRIDE program is based on a moralistic and control paradigm at least 100 years old that is incorrect scientifically and ineffective practically. If this weren't true we wouldn't currently be as impotent against drug addiction as we are. These kinds of moralistic, stigmatizing, and fear inducing "education and prevention" programs not only don't reduce addictions of all kinds, but force underground the people who will inevitably use and get addicted to drugs and other things where they are deeply injured and, additionally, will inevitably cause the social harms they desperately don't want to commit. Thus, the paradoxical negative effects of PRIDE programs and programs like it.

Instead of educating students, parents, and society on the actual science-based neurobiology of addictions and the helpful policies that should be derived from it, PRIDE programs teach an incorrect addiction paradigm that result in policies both ineffective and harmful. This is caused by the current misunderstanding of why people use drugs and why certain people inevitably get addicted. In this respect, addiction is no different from Diabetes, many cancers, and most other science based medical diseases not caused by the victim's consciousness. This last sentence is the crux of the misunderstanding of addictions - "not caused by the victim's consciousness." Another way to say the same thing is, "Against the will of the victim."

I'm certain you wouldn't blame the victims of Diabetes and cancer for causing their disease and wouldn't have "education and prevention" programs designed around their conscious causation either. Can you picture a judge, policeman, social worker, and therapist telling an audience not to get cancer or Diabetes and that if they do they will be prosecuted? In fact, if you did, the victims of these diseases would nonetheless succumb to these diseases and would have to go underground and suffer just as the future addicts of today do under programs like PRIDE. PRIDE programs make no sense for Diabetes, cancer, or any other medical disease, and they make no sense for addictions, symptoms of a medical disease. Why? Because none are caused by conscious decisions or choice. I realize this last statement goes against everything you believe about addictions, but as I said in the beginning of this letter, what you believe you know about addictions is wrong even though it seems so intuitively right. The current addiction paradigm has been wrong for 100 years and will continue to be wrong indefinitely. When the paradigm is wrong, the treatment and policies derived from it are wrong. They don't work to produce the effects we want from them and they paradoxically perpetuate rather than solve the problem they were designed to solve. This is the case with DARE and it is the case with PRIDE and is the case for the drug war and all policies and programs based on the incorrect drug use and addiction paradigm. These programs not only don't do what we say we want them to do but they make the problem worse, as they must. To reiterate: WHEN THE PARADIGM IS WRONG, THE TREATMENTS AND POLICIES BASED ON IT ARE WRONG. These policies hurt our kids rather than help them. I know this all goes against your opinions and intuition, but reputable people like yourself once believed the sun revolved around the earth, the earth was flat, infections were caused by miasma, and other dead paradigms. The current addiction paradigm based on conscious decision and choice is just as intuitive and just as dead. It just doesn't realize it yet.

So, if PRIDE makes things worse, and if we don't want things to continue to get worse, what then is the alternative?

Let's teach the real and actual neurobiological paradigm of addictions and see if this, as it should, leads to diminution of the harm caused by addictions. This is what we want, right? As with other real diseases, the teaching of the actual pathophysiology of the disease leads not only to destigmatization of the disease and its victims, a good thing, and the resultant earlier entry into recovery from the disease, a good thing, but also, by this route, to less severe complications caused by the disease, again, a good thing. In doing so, we are not condoning addiction any more than we condone cancer or Diabetes. We don't want or like cancer, addictions, or Diabetes, but due to our understanding of their causes at this time, we know they occur, that we can't prevent them through our collective will, but we can help their victims deal appropriately with them as soon as is heavenly possible, just the opposite result if these diseases are stigmatized and their victims blamed and ostracized, the only thing PRIDE accomplishes.

The following is what I suggest if you are truly interested in helping students and society with addictions. Let's stop the moralizing, stigmatizing, ostracizing, and scientifically incorrectly based PRIDE program, and start teaching students, teachers, and the public about the actual neurobiology behind addictions and see if this, as it should and will, leads to the positive changes we all want to have come about for addictions. I would be happy and thrilled to volunteer to teach to your school system the most up to date and complete science based addiction paradigm that will lead to the results you all want.

Please let me know if you are interested in my help.

Sincerely Yours,
Dan F. Umanoff, M.D.









You can take the addiction out of the hypoic, but you can't take the Hypoism out of the addict.




Sign In