comprehensive coverage. Dependent health care coverage is
presumed comprehensive if it includes medical and hospital coverage and provides for
preventive, emergency, acute, and chronic care. If both parents have health care coverage that meets
the minimum requirements, the court must determine which health care coverage is more
comprehensive by considering whether the coverage includes:
(i) basic dental coverage;
(ii) orthodontia;
(iii) eyeglasses;
(iv) contact lenses;
(v) mental health services; or
(vi) substance abuse treatment;
affordable coverage. Dependent health care coverage is
affordable if it is reasonable in cost; and
special needs of child. Te court must consider any
special needs of a joint child.
If both parents have health care coverage available for a joint
child, and the
available coverage is comparable based on the factors above, it
shall be presumed that the court require the parent with the least
costly plan to provide coverage.
If a joint child is presently enrolled in health care coverage, the court must order that the parent who currently
has the joint child enrolled to continue that enrollment unless the parents agree otherwise or
the court orders a modification based on the request of a party.
What Happens if Neither Parent has Insurance or Medical Assistance is
provided?
If neither parent has appropriate health care coverage
available through their employment or other means, the court must order
the parents to:
- contribute toward the actual health care costs of the joint
children based on a pro rata share; or
- if the joint child is receiving any form of medical
assistance under chapter 256B or MinnesotaCare under chapter 256L, the parent with whom the joint
child does not reside shall contribute a monthly amount toward the actual cost of medical
assistance under chapter 256B or
MinnesotaCare under chapter 256L. The amount of contribution of the
noncustodial parent is the amount the noncustodial parent would pay for the child's premiums if
the noncustodial parent's PICS income meets the eligibility
requirements for public coverage. The custodial parent's obligation is determined under the
requirements for public coverage as set forth in chapter 256B or 256L. The court may order
the parent with whom the child resides to apply for public coverage for the child.
How are Expenses Divided if a Parent has Insurance for Other
Non-Joint Children?
- Existing Insurance for Other Non-Joint Dependants. If the party ordered to carry health care coverage for the
joint child already carries dependent health care coverage for other dependents and would incur
no additional premium costs to add the joint child to the existing coverage, the court
must not order the other party to contribute to the premium costs for coverage of the joint child.
- No Existing Insurance for Non-Joint Dependents.
If a party ordered to carry health care coverage for the
joint child does not already carry dependent health care coverage but has other dependents who may be
added to the ordered coverage, the full premium costs of the dependent health care
coverage must be allocated between the parties in proportion to
their income unless the parties agree otherwise.
Only Insurance Costs for the Child's Premium Divided.
If a party ordered to carry health care coverage for the
joint child is required to enroll in a health plan so that the joint child can be enrolled under the
plan, only the expenses related to the child's premium are
divided. In other words, the parents divide any expense that is
greater than the cost of individual coverage.
What if an Employer Ignores a Medical Support Order?
Any employer or union that willfully fails to comply with the order or notice
for medical support tat is properly served under Minnesota laws is liable for any uninsured medical
expenses incurred by the dependents while the dependents were eligible to be enrolled in the health plan
and for any other premium costs incurred because the employer or union willfully failed to
comply with the order or notice. The employer or union may
also be subject to a contempt finding, a $250 civil penalty and
an additional civil penalty of $500 to be paid to the
party entitled to reimbursement or the public authority.
How
Long Must a Parent Provide Insurance?
Unless a court order provides otherwise, a child for whom a party is required to
provide health care coverage must be covered as a dependent of the party until
the child is emancipated, until further order of the court, or as consistent with the terms of the
coverage.
The health carrier, employer, or union may not disenroll or
eliminate coverage for the child unless:
- the health carrier, employer, or union is provided
satisfactory written evidence that the court order is no longer in effect;
- the joint child is or will be enrolled in comparable health
care coverage through another health plan that will take effect no later than the effective date
of the disenrollment;
- the employee is no longer eligible for dependent coverage;
or
- the required premium has not been paid by or on behalf of
the joint child.
The health plan must provide 30 days' written notice to the
joint child's parents, and the public authority if the public authority provides support
enforcement services, before the health
plan disenrolls or eliminates the joint child's coverage.
How
Are Costs not Covered by Insurance Divided?
It is presumed under Minnesota law that parents are
required to divide costs related to uninsured medial
expenses or unreimbursed medical expenses proportionate to
their income