
|

Minnesota Lawyers
Ofc. 612.240.8005
Suite 700
5775 Wayzata Boulevard
St. Louis Park, MN 55416

maury@beaulier.com
Sitemap

|

|

-
-
DWI, OWI, DUI, Drunk Driving, Boating while intoxicated (BWI), snowmobiling while intoxicated, theft, fraud, homicide, assault, hit and run, driving after suspension (DAS), drug charges, driving after revocation (DAR), driving after cancellation (DAC)
On this page you may discuss your Wisconsin or Minnesota criminal case with others or ask a legal question. Please remember to identify the state of the violation in your question and the charging statute number if known. For a consultation call or for emergency assistance call 612.240.8005.
-
IMPORTANT: Please remember that the bulletin board is open to the public and answers to questions may include answers by non-attorneys. Any information posted should be considered general in nature and may not apply to your individual circumstances. To respond to a message that has been posted, click on the message and hit "reply". To post a new message simply hit "add message." Please review a full listing of our Rules of Use and Disclaimer before posting.
 |
Subject Clear as Mud

Date
Mon Apr 26 2010 15:09

Author moving_back_where_we_belong

 |
 |
OK, I waded through all of the revisions.
The way this legislation is currently written, a repeat DWI offender must install an interlock on his vehicle. After a period of "sobriety" which is demonstrated through not blowing above a .02, one's full license is restored. The authors of the legislation appear to have been very careful to ensure that the restriction ONLY applied while driving, operating, or in actual control of a motor vehicle. Sounds logical! Gasp, they even propose to raise the allowable alcohol level for these folks to .04 by 2013.
They also, of course, eliminated the B Card, which would then be redundant and more restrictive.
Then, they re-inserted the B Card language, prohibiting any alcohol use at any time whatsoever, whether driving or not.
So, which is it? Just a tad contradictory, no?
|
 |
 |

Click here for this discussion's index
|

|